Buck Stoppers

Photo credit: David Sherman/NBAE/Getty Images
The Wolves rebounded from a listless performance against Chicago with a 95-76 win over the Bucks last night, closing out their preseason with a 6-2 record. News of the three roster cuts and speculation about further moves overshadowed a sub par game, but as with last year, the decisive win over Milwaukee gives the club some momentum heading into the regular season. We can only hope, pray, beg, plead, petition, demand, cajole, insist, ask or request that the Wolves season start out better than last year. Whatever works.
Positives and Negatives:
Positives:
Big Al. Once again, he's the most consistent offensive threat on the club. Against the Bucks he went for 19 points, 5 rebounds, and a +9 for the night. One problem with the Wolves presently is that all the other roster "weapons" are going for long dry spells. While the regular season will bring hopefully a more balanced rotation and substitution scheme, those folks might want to shake off whatever first half shooting issues they have and help Al out.
Kevin Love. I've often thought that Jim Petersen and Tom Hanneman would make an excellent political rapid response media team. (They can't be any worse than Michelle Bachmann) Given Reusse's recent article torching Love, the spin on K-Love was in full force last night on FSN North. Of course, the REAL way an athlete can prove a scribe wrong is to perform, and to his credit Love did, with a 14 point, 10 rebound, +11 night. It doesn't negate the things Reusse said, but goodness, let's at least give the lad half a season before we mercilessly rip into him and scald McHale again for his personnel evaluation ineptitude.
Mike Miller. He stunk offensively in the first half, but got his shooting touch back a bit in the second, scoring 12 points, with 8 rebounds, 4 assists and a +7 for the evening. Here's what savvy veterans do; when they don't have it going shot-wise, they contribute the other little things to make their team better.Miller gets this, and his all-around game should be an example for people like McCants who still is at a "me-first" stage of his career.
Kevin Ollie. A + 14 for the night, one could debate at this point why on a team that probably won't make the playoffs do the Wolves need a veteran like Ollie at the third guard. I know Ahearn shot well, but I'm happy Ollie stuck. He's not spectacular, but the Wolves core players still need a little quality veteran mojo, and this guy seems to have it. Ahearn isn't really a point guard, and if you DO want to get the season off to better start than last year, given that Telfair is sitting out the first few games, having Ollie come off the bench gives you a better chance at success.
Ball Movement. The Wolves had 23 assists last night. Good for them, because in order to get "anyone but Al" off, the ball should be flying around the court to get folks open looks.
Negatives:
Perimeter Defense. Yeah, Milwaukee only shot 36 percent for the night, but the way Luke Ridnour started out, it looked like it was going to be a long night--again--on the perimeter for the Wolves. Given that it looks like the club is going to go with a small frontcourt for starters, there's going to be a lot of double teaming down low, which will naturally prompt teams to swing the ball around to someone open on the perimeter. Foye hasn't demonstrated much ability to guard anyone, and no one seems to want to pressure the ball coming up the court on a consistent basis. How many years have we seen that?
Corey Brewer. It looks like he's going to make the starting five. Okay, given the defensive issues on this club, I kind of get it, but it still looking like he's hurting the club more than helping at this point. He's losing his shooting touch, so his defense better be mighty good, because there are other starting configurations on the roster that would be more successful, especially when Collins gets healthy.
Anyone but Al. I've mentioned it throughout this post, but again, what about all these other weapons we were supposed to have? Can't more players start out a little better? Please?
Summary:
As I mentioned last post, the Wolves have a ton of stuff to work on. It looks like they're going to start the season with a small front court, they can't guard anyone on the perimeter, and they need more balance and consistency from their offense. Still, there's a little buzz about this motley crew that could keep us interested and engaged for the entire season. Hopefully, this will be the year where we can finally find out whether Foye can handle the point guard position, and Wittman can coach without excuses. They have a great chance to start the season with a win, and if they can pull an upset or two against some initially tough competition (Mavs, Spurs, Blazers), breaking even in November would represent real progress. I'm a die-hard cynic, but I'm ready to be proven wrong.
Comments
This is a very obvious and simple point, but I think we need to run everything through Jefferson. Like—there shouldn’t be a single half-court set with him on the floor when he doesn’t touch the ball on either the high or low post. He’s good enough to carry a team to a respectable season. There are plenty of flaws on the roster, but when you have a guy like Al, you shouldn’t be winning less than 30 games.
by Andy G on
Oct 24, 2008 9:03 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was there until mid-third quarter
A few observations before we took control of the game -
Bassy was a disassy. The offense was in disarray with Sebastian at the point. In ten minutes he attempted three long jumpers. That’s not as bad as Maddog launching, but on a 3-2 bet I might take Madsen vs Telfair in a game of H-O-R-S-E.
McCants is not a sixth man. He’s like a fish out of water when he is teamed with other real scoring threats – he just doesn’t integrate himself well into the offense. Where he shines is as the primary offensive option on the second team. He’s a JV Kobe.
My seats are within pretty easy shouting distance of the Wolves bench. I was tempted to yell shortly before half: “Childress – is this your idea of a kickass offense?” I wish I had.
by A.K. Agikamik on
Oct 24, 2008 10:34 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
hehe that's funny
I hope they don’t start out 1-11, but the Brewster joke possibilities will be funny if they do.
by plinytheelder on
Oct 24, 2008 12:19 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice point about Love (though I’ve always considered him anti-American ;)…by the way I know this isn’t a political blog but what the hell was Bachmann thinking?), I can’t for the life of me understand why Reusse would want to be so quick to call him a bust. Because that’s essentially what he did. I mean, I guess I understand perfectly why he did it: he’s a sportswriter, he wants to create a buzz, start a controversy, etc. And to be honest I usually like Reusse, though I know I’m in the minority on that one. But I think he’s making a mistake here. Everyone knows Love can’t jump as high as Joakim Noah, but that’s not the point…and I guess that’s my problem with the article: Reusse doesn’t bring anything new to the table. If he’s just going to rehash old arguments, you’d think he’d give Love until at least mid-season.
The other thing I found strange about Reusse’s article was the counter argument he used: Mayo’s apparently gaudy pre-season numbers. If I remember right doesn’t he cite a 12-28 and a 3-9 shooting night? First, that’s not very good; second, what the hell is Mayo doing jacking up 28 shots? 28 shots! Third, why does someone like Reusse, who should know better, think this is impressive?
by plinytheelder on
Oct 24, 2008 12:32 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If the Mayo numbers....
where being put up on the Wolves Reusse would be horrified by them.
by Pants_ on
Oct 24, 2008 2:37 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs









