Catching Up

I hope you all have had a wonderful Thanksgiving weekend. Yours truly had a fantastic time with some old friends coming up from Omaha to join us with my parents, sister, and her boyfriend. We ate way too much food and we tore apart and remodeled our basement bathroom. We also watched some hoops.
You really have to love the NBA sometimes. Having paid for the League Pass Broadband package, I have been able to watch exactly zero of the past three games without having to resort to live streams from overseas sources. Why pay for something I can get for free...especially if it doesn't contain all of the games? I've written the folks at League Pass about this and I have received no response. I live in a household that doesn't have cable, is in radio no-mans land, and is out of range of the team's local TV broadcast network. How am I supposed to legally watch the games? Having illegally watched the games, let me now demonstrate the ridiculousness of the NBA's broadband policy by giving what I should not have seen some free pub.
With three games over the Thanksgiving break there certainly isn't a shortage of things to talk about with this squad. Let's ignore the games for a second to talk about the two big elephants in the room: Randy Wittman and Rashad McCants.
During the team's trip to OKC, Jerry Zgoda (and the radio crew) made note of the fact that Kevin McHale had made a rare road trip, presumably because some sort of move would be made if the team did not pull out a miraculous last-second victory. I, for one, do not believe that the team would have fired Witt had the team failed to win against OKC. First off, it's a ridiculous premise; this team is supposed to be all about long-term development and when they pull off a win on a shot with 0.1 seconds remaining, the long-term issues do what exactly? Do they disappear? Witt suddenly becomes a better coach for said development? The team magically has better talent? Sorry, I'm not buying it. Changing coaches does nothing to make this a better team in the long run. In order to do that, you need some front office dominoes to fall.
I think it's much more plausible that the team is doing whatever it can to make a deal that involves a certain born-to-be-hated-dying-to-be-loved off-guard that has completely fallen off the radar in the past few games.
Against Denver Shaddy had 2 stints; the first one was 2.9 minutes with one three point shot and nothing else, and the second one was 3 minutes with three three point shots and not much else. Against OKC he was a DNP-CD. Against Phoenix he had three stints; 2 unproductive runs of less than 5 minutes and one game-ending garbage timer with a few threes when they meant absolutely nothing.
At this point in the season, Shaddy seems to have simply decided that he will get in the game and jack up whatever he can before he is trotted back to the bench. He's barely in the rotation anymore, with Ryan Gomes cementing himself at the starting 3 and Corey Brewer being the primary sub at both the 2 and 3. I don't write much about chemistry because I obviously have zero access to the locker room, but something appears to be amiss. I don't know what it is but my best guess is that Shaddy is not long for the Wolves' world.
Getting around to the games, the Wolves did not deserve to win any of the three contests. Against OKC, the Wolves allowed the league's worst shooting team to shoot 50% from the field (42.8% from beyond the arc). Against Phoenix they were never in the game, and against Denver they got smacked around a'la Boston by an obscene 3rd quarter. I eagerly await Papa Glen's next newspaper interview about how this team just doesn't know how to play 4th 3rd quarters.
That's about all I'm going to write about the actual on-court product of which I paid for but I couldn't actually legally watch. Instead, let me finish with a broad point and a re-hash of one of last season's most loved/hated (in honor of Shaddy) features: Mega-Deal Monday.
Here's the kicker with the Wolves: they are not a 4-11 team but they are not better than a 4-11 team...if that makes any sense at all. With reasonable rotations and a more clearly defined pecking order (to say nothing of taking too long to adhere to winning zombie ball by simplifying the offense for the non-point point guard) Our Beloved Puppies Zombies should probably have wins against San Antonio, Golden State, and maybe one of the Portland games. However, they are clearly still in the bottom third of the NBA. 4-11, 5-10...so what? This team is simply not cutting it in several key areas, namely player development, OE/DE neutrality, and FG% consistency. Despite the Iron Ranger's insistence that this was going to be a winning year, it was, is, and will not be, and anyone with a passing interest in the game can, could have, and will tell you this. This year should have been all about giving young guys like Brewer, Randy Foye, and Kevin Love as many minutes as possible, as well as seeing if Big Al Jefferson has enough two-way juice to be a true cornerstone player. With that last little ditty in mind, and with growing frustration concerning the product that is being trotted out on the court (which I pay for but cannot legally watch), let me present to you the year's first Mega-Deal Monday, the blow-it-up edition:
To the Bulls:
- Al Jefferson
- Channing Frye
To the Blazers:
- Mike Miller
- Conditional pick from Wolves
To the Wolves:
- Kirk Hinrich
- Travis Outlaw
- Joakim Noah
Rotation:
- Hinrich/Sebastian Telfair
- Foye/Brewer
- Outlaw/Ryan Gomes
- Love/Craig Smith
- Noah/Jason Collins
Option #2:
To the Cavs:
- Al Jefferson
- Rashad McCants
To the Blazers:
- Mike Miller
To the Wolves:
- Rudy Fernandez
- Wally Szczerbiak
- Raef Lafrenz
- Cleveland #1
- Portland conditional #1 (not necessary)
Rotation:
- Foye/Telfair
- Fernandez/Foye/Brewer
- Gomes/Brewer
- Love/Smith
- Collins/Mark Madsen
The Wolves would then enter next season with barely anything on the books (seriously, it would be something in the $25-30 million range) and a ton of picks. They draft the BPA available with the top pick (ideally a true point or combo guard) and then get (at least) the best center they can with the remaining picks.
To tell you the truth, if option #2 were on the table, I'd take it in a heart beat...no additional thought required. And yes, I get that Big Al is packaged in the trade...which should tell you a lot about my faith in this team to a) get it right with him on the squad and b) for him to be a legit cornerstone.
What say you?
Comments
I say we give up WAY too much in the first deal.
Al’s value is high (regardless of anything we don’t like about his game) and Miller’s is still above average, despite not shooting the lights out right now. Kirk Hinrich’s injured and his trade value doesn’t seem terribly high to me. He’s hasn’t proven he’s the point guard in Chicago over the last few years, with ample opportunity to do so, and the Bulls just drafted Derrick Rose. Plus, Hinrich’s contract runs for another 3 seasons. That being said, I like Hinrich as a player.
Outlaw and Noah’s values wouldn’t seem high to me either. Noah can do some good things, but if we don’t have Al anymore, why bother with Noah (i.e. I think he’s more valuable to the Wolves as a complement to Al than on his own). Outlaw’s been mentioned in rumors for Mike Conley, but Portland seems to be the team needing to give up more in the deal.
The second deal looks like overpayment to me too, because although Wally and LaFrentz are expiring, they don’t as much value in exchange for Al since Al’s not overpaid in the least. If anything, his long-term deal looks like a steal given his production and room for growth.
Anyway, going the expiring route in general will never make sense to me for the Wolves as a maximizing cap-space strategy. Signing marquee free agents should not be in their personnel strategy at all. I still don’t think it’s a good way to build a team in general, but specifically, who wants to sign with the Wolves?
by wyn on
Nov 30, 2008 5:43 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry, should've offered some alternatives...
… I think we have enough valuable assets to package together for a star or near star player on someone else’s squad. That would seem to give the best immediate improvement, while investing future cap space in a reasonable contract.
Guys like Josh Howard, Joe Johnson, Gerald Wallace (to a lesser extent), Andrei Kirilenko (I’ve been a proponent previously), Michael Redd (don’t really think he’ll be traded), Shawn Marion (just kind of throwing stuff out now) and Lamar come to mind. Granted, I don’t necessarily think all these guys are really available.
I think a player of those calibers can be acquired for some combo of picks, Craig, Randy, Shad, Brewer, Carney, Collins, and/or Telfair (depending on the positions of players we’d get in return). These are all low-cost assets with varying value. If another rebuilding team needs to unload a talented, but expensive, player that would fit with Al, Love and Miller, I think we could take a jump forward in our own rebuilding, presuming we could hold onto the player we acquire.
by wyn on
Nov 30, 2008 5:52 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't like the 1st idea either.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 7:29 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we all agree....
That it was a mistake to trade away Mayo? Also I don’t really feel like Minnesota is a realistic player in the Free agent bonanza in the next couple of years. I think it would be foolish to get rid of Jefferson and in my mind the Wolves should dump as many players as possible to pick up draft picks. I think they could still get some value for Brewer (I realize that people like his D, but I say try to pick up some future 2nd rounders for him) and dump Love because we don’t need him at the PF position anyways.
by Laughing Stock on
Nov 30, 2008 6:04 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Also
Just go ahead and get rid of Miller and Telfair while they’re at it.
by Laughing Stock on
Nov 30, 2008 6:05 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It will depend..
…on what they do in the next draft as far as Love is concerned. He’s going to be good and I think people overlook that he is a year removed from high school and is putting up a PER around 15 with 13.5 and 9.8 reb per 36 minutes. I think he’s well on his way to being a better 2 way player than Jefferson.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 7:29 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OJ Mayo (17 games) 18.0 PER, 108 Orate, 110 Drate, 5.8 WS per 40
Kevin Love (15 games) 15.5 PER, 108 Orate, 106 Drate, 9.0 WS per 40
As for the Jefferson ideas, I’m in the camp that believes he can’t be a legit contender’s best player, but he’s still a bad, bad man, and I don’t think I’d trade him for space or picks. I think if they could find an athletic, long flyswatter to work in a rotation with Jefferson and Love, they’d be in good shape up front.
If I am going to trade an Al Jefferson, I ideally land an underrated type player along with a promising young guy and/or picks. I said it before, but I’d have half a mind to call up Chris Mullin and see if that Biedrins/Wright offer that was supposedly there for KG might be there for Al. Something like that.
But in the meantime, even if one of Al or Love is destined to be dealt, there’s time to wait.
What will be interesting is if it’s their turn to pick in the 2009 draft and Blake Griffen’s the BPA.
by jianfu on
Nov 30, 2008 8:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed about Griffen...
…he’s on his way to having a monster season and if he falls into the Wolves laps as the BPA, they’ll have switched from undersized combo guards to undersized 4s as their player of choice….with the best one being available when they can least afford to take him a’la Mayo.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 9:10 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also...
…I guess I should have made it clearer in the post that this isn’t a call for a trade. It’s just something for conversation during a long year. I am becoming more of the opinion that Al isn’t a cornerstone type of guy a’la KG (most guys aren’t) and that this particular FO is incapable of putting the right personnel and system around him in order to make up for his deficiencies.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 9:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I Understood
Just a what if scenario. What if we just blew up the Minnesota T-wolves?
by Laughing Stock on
Nov 30, 2008 10:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I actually think
that they have 90% of the right personnel around Jefferson, which is what makes this season so infuriating. I’ve also started thinking they need to throw a pile of money at Jeff Van Gundy to come out of retirement and coach the team.
by McCleak on
Nov 30, 2008 10:47 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed...
…I’ve used this analogy before, but it’s almost like if Ron Gardenhire told his guys to swing for the fences…that’s how this team is playing right now.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:05 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Open to trades except for Al, Love, Brewer and Foye
Al Jefferson is an absolute stud and the proposed trades by SNP are pretty ugly. At this point Al is already a top 5 big man in the league. Do not trade Al, I think he can be the franchise cornerstone. Foye is starting to get it. He’s not ever going to be a pass first point guard, but he’s beginning to look like a 20-5-5 guy, poor man’s D-wade. I don’t know if he’ll ever be better than Roy, but he’s starting to show me something after the slow start. Same with Love, he will be very good, possibly even as a small forward. I don’t think it was a mistake to trade for Love, especially considering we got Miller and got rid of Marko’s albatross of a contract. With Al, Love, Foye, as pieces, wolves need to acquire a point guard and a center. I like the idea of trotting out a big line-up with Love at the 3. Granted he might have trouble with quick small forwards. Also, I’m seeing good things from Brewer, he’s so quick and long. His shooting has improved, I’d like to see him get more burn along with Love.
Here is the trade I’d like to see:
Mike Miller, McCants, Cardinal, Madsen to Cleveland for Wally and Snows’ expiring contracts, maybe first round pick…
Wolves then have great flexibility going forward and keep their nucleus intact.
by DR_JPK on
Nov 30, 2008 7:07 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
He's definitely a top 5 offensive big man...
…but the defense…wow. That OKC game was brutal. Check out the highlight package on the post below this one. He was failing to rotate all night (and season) long. Also, I didn’t make mention of it here but Foye is starting the “we need to stop bickering at each other” chant. This is probably directed at one player and one player only. I agree that the Bulls trade is especially ugly but I’d still do the 2nd one in a heartbeat.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 7:23 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A view from Portland
I think you can scratch any trade idea that includes Fernandez. He’s cooled off the last few games, but our tv guys say it’s because other teams are scouting him better and they fully expect him to adjust. But no way are the Blazers letting go of him this soon.
As much as we love Frye & Outlaw I think the fans realize one or the other is probably expendable.. If Martell Webster comes back with a bang (he’s expected to play in the next week) then Travis could be traded. Batum has developed so much faster than anyone expected (the original thought was D-League this season and now it’s going to be hard to take him out of the starting lineup to make room for Webster). Travis runs hot and cold. When he’s good he’s very good, but when he’s bad it’s hard to remember the good. Some fans still think he’ll keep improving (he’s better this year than he was last) but it would take more consistency to convince me he’s a keeper. Batum’s growth has been exponentially faster than Outlaw’s.
A few days ago there was a wild rumor floating around that included Outlaw to Memphis. Before the game that night Kevin Pritchard took Travis aside and told him he was not being traded and was quoted in the Oregonian, ""I like the team I have and really, right now is the quietest it has been (on the trade front) that I can remember." So Pritchard isn’t seeking a trade and any that came to him would have to be pretty special to be considered.
It is almost a month old, but Dave posted a story about what Blazers might be available for a trade. It’s a good read and would give you an idea of what players you might be able to pry lose from us for future trade suggestions.
by jorga on
Nov 30, 2008 7:15 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I had another one...
…that included Outlaw w/o Fernandez. I read that post and it was a good one. I just think that Miller is custom built for your squad and the Wolves would need a starter in return. Ideally, it’s a 2 because the Wolves have Gomes and Brewer at the 3 and Gomes is turning into a very nice 2 way player.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 7:26 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would think Travis is the most available player on the Blazers
But I remember reading somewhere that Kevin Pritchard was not interested in Mike Miller at all. I actually think Travis would be a good fit on the Wolves, but it would suck to trade him within the division, would rather send him to the eastern conference like we did Jarrett Jack.
by Sabonis4Ever on
Nov 30, 2008 10:47 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Normally...
…I would completely agree with the not-trading-in-the-division thing, but this is the Wolves we’re talking about ;)
Outlaw would be a very nice fit for the Wolves. They had the right idea with Corey Brewer but he’s still developing.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:06 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah no thanks
i gather that he would just be an expiring contract amid a much more complicated trade package, but…
no thanks
by secretarykissinger on
Nov 30, 2008 9:22 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He could pair up...
…with the Wally look-alike at the home games for some ridiculous contests.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:07 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Value
Hmmm….While Al’s defense has been pretty bad, I still can’t agree that the second trade would get us anything close to value for Al. As a matter of fact, I’m really not sure where Al’s value is (considering his potential and cap friendly contract). That being said what about this deal
New Orleans Receives:
1. Big Al
2. McCants
3. Cardinal’s bad contract
Minnesota Receives:
1. D. West
2. Julian Wright
3. Mike James’ Expiring Contract (with no chance of us not buying him out)
I have to imagine New Orleans would immediately jump at this. Hornets don’t seem to have it this year, and they may be looking to shake things up anyway. If they had the opportunity to pair Paul and Al for the next however many years with Chandler to make up for Al’s defensive inefficiencies…wow.
I’m still not that excited about what the Wolves would get back though. A D. West and Love front court would still be (at best) average defensively, but I guess that is still way better than what we’re putting out right now. I also think Julian Wright is quite a player, although that would just add to our glut at the SF position. Another trade would have to follow this up.
by Blakeley on
Nov 30, 2008 8:20 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the problem...
…with Al is that his value is higher amongst us fans than it is among league execs. He’s a fantastic post scorer and that’s about it. He’s committed to the community and he appears to be well liked by the organization so I don’t see them moving him, but…well, it’s fun to speculate and we’re in for a long year.
I’m not sure about getting another 4 back in the deal. West is nice but I think you run into the same issues you have with the style of play this team runs around Love/Jefferson. I still think that pairing could work but the FO will need to change or they will have to luck themselves into Basketball Jesus.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Nov 30, 2008 9:08 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
curious, to SnP:
that tile looks dope, but how are you draining the shower stall?
sounds like a great weekend out there. if you feel abject about your clandestine basketball watching, let me share that the international streams i use were apparently all down and i only got the games on audio. for the record, the thunder radio network announcers are incredible. incredibly bad, that is — reminded me of listening to high school ball back in my dakota childhood.
by secretarykissinger on
Nov 30, 2008 9:27 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Welcome to the wonderful world of Oklahoma sports...
…I get to listen in a couple of times a year when we visit the in-laws. They have the worst sports talk radio in the world too. Something called the Sports Animal.
As for the tile, I didn’t notice it in the picture, but we hadn’t yet cut the drain hole. Those 4 inner tiles have no mortar on the bottom and are just there because we worked inside/out.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:12 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A little OT: I laughed about your new blog subtitle SnP
And I feel your pain. Last year I had to do the same thing, since I’m often working abroad and the NBA didn’t even offer league pass broadband internationally last year (independent of a US cable contract). So I had to make do with a number of crude P2P apps and Flash streaming sites while also paying for an expensive local pay tv channel who carried exactly two games per week (three during playoffs). Great. This year they at least do offer league pass broadband internationally at a fair price, and while I’m thankful for that and not blacked out the quality is often underwhelming and very blocky / choppy. I emailed them with a request for an improvement since I know it’s not on my side (more than T1 speed with a cable modem) – so far only silence. Last year I had complained all the way up to a director of international relations and marketing, but she also was not really helpful. She did reveal though that my pay tv channel sometimes had just a few thousand viewers in the middle of the night but they made the deal anyway.
The NBA – where not allowing loyal customers to view our product in good quality or at all happens.
by Norsktroll on
Nov 30, 2008 9:33 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
A little more OT
I loled at that last line. They shouldv known that thing was gonna backfire every times something bad happens (though the commercials on itself are pretty inspiring).
by Wim (Belgium) on
Dec 1, 2008 3:52 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Last year...
…they hooked me up with a non-blocked out plan so I know it can be done. It was a code that allowed for all games. This year the website is being run by TNT, not the NBA so that may have something to do with them being a bit less responsive.
That last line is spot on. I may simply not pay next year and watch the free streams if I have a few more blackouts.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:16 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What I say...
About Big AL
Define cornerstone player. I think Al is somewhere between Melo and Bosh. Melo won’t ever win a championship as long as he’s the best player on a team and Bosh might, but he’ll need more than one “semi-star”. I don’t even think that any one player is good enough to make it without having at least 1 other semi-start on the roster. Even Kobe and Lebron couldn’t do that. I think the problem with this organisation is not with it’s star player(s).
I feel defense is all about the team concept. I feel it’s the coaches responsability to make sure the defense runs at least acceptable. Don’t tell me Jefferson is unwilling to work on that end of the floor, so sure, he will never be a star at that end of the floor, but, our defense seems to be just not clicking, not just with Jefferson, this is something that should and could be fixed by coaching.
That’s why I disagree that a coaching change would not affect the long term future. I do think it shouldn’t be based on the outcome of one game but I do believe a coach makes all the difference in the world for a long term future. A lot of it is psychological: installing a good work ethic, chemistry, etc, another bit is the development. Or are we just having the bad luck that we always make the consensus pick for the position we’re drafting at but always seem to get the guy everyone misjudged… come on.
Not that a coaching change would miraculously fix things up but I just can’t see the problem being with the players.
I can even see a lot of Spurrishness in our lineup, check this out:
A big man in the middle, not really THE best defender but very solid fundamentals, more of a skill type of player but not a pushover either. Draws double teams
— Duncan/AL —
The difference: Al needs to improve some aspects of his game, namely passing and defense
A mostly defensive role player that has only one weapon on offense, can sometimes completely shut down the other team’s best perimeter guy.
— Brewer/Bowen —
The difference: Brewer seems like the Tazmanian Devil while Bowen is the classic English gentleman. Brewer’s weapon is his speed while Bowen’s only weapon is a 3pt shot.
A starting 2-guard who’s primary weapon is jump shooting. Can do some other things as well. Offers some veteran xp.
— Miller/Finley —
The difference: Miller’s defense is not as good as Finley’s?
A 6th man that can completely change the makeup of the team by changing the tempo because he plays a lot faster that the starting 2-guard. Also has a good shot but has some other qualities as well, namely driving to the basket, getting fouls.
— Ginobili/FoyeAndMccants —
The difference: will Foye ever play like (a poor man’s) D-Wade? Will Shaddy ever fit his talents into a team concept?
Obviously at C we don’t have the putback/energy guy .. bring in Noah!
Obviously at PG we don’t have that penetrator/distributor/floor general .. bring in Rubio!
For the rest, I think our roster is definitly deeper than the Spurs’ was when they won the championships. They had Elson, Barry, Udrih on their bench, we have Love, Gomes, Carney and Telfair. That’s a no brainer.
So the difference? Popovich/Wittman + years worth of experience off course.
For the people who don’t think coaching makes that much of a difference, I say to thee: january 23, 2007.
Trade Proposal #1: Not completely botched but just not enough valueback. I agree with wyn that there’s not much use for Noah if Jefferson isn’t here.
Trade Proposal #2: It feels to early to blow up the team just for a chance to start over on a weak draft/free agency. We’d end up back to this exact square in 2-3 years as long as Wittman is here. Especially since it relies on free agency to get us some new players, which won’t work.
Thanks again for the good stuff, I’ve really had some nasty side effects from not being able to read something new here every day. I actually had to go out of the home and get me a new girlfriend, thanks a lot SnP, now how am I gonna find enough time to keep reading this? ;).
by Wim (Belgium) on
Dec 1, 2008 3:50 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree...
…with the idea that Al needs someone else of comparative ability to make this work. I also like the in-between-Melo-and-Bosh comparison. Very nice.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:19 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Proposal #2
looks like something Bill Simmons would come up with – one to liberate decent players from their MN purgatory!
Anything in the McCants rumors?
by Auswolf on
Dec 1, 2008 5:41 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
As for McCants...
…there has been some rumbling about a Charlotte trade but that’s about it for team specifics. Here’s my best trade machine attempt for the two teams:
To the Bobcats:
- Shaddy
- Collins
- Brewer
- Booth
To the Wolves:
- Gerald Wallace
- Ray Felton
- Alexis Ajinca
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:34 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And where IS the drain?
On that tilework alone, I may hire you to come out and do mine.
by Auswolf on
Dec 1, 2008 5:42 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I assure you...
…the drain is there ;)
That picture was taken before we cut and set the middle tiles. We worked inside/out and those 4 were simply placeholders.
PS: My tilework services will see a significant upgrade in price for work down under. It’s a bit of a trip. BTW: I’ve always wondered if “down under” is a term that actual Australians use or if it is just something dopey non-Australians use that makes them sound dorky.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 1, 2008 7:21 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What about Men at work?
mmm vegemite! ;)
by plinytheelder on
Dec 1, 2008 7:51 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Down Under"
de facto national anthem.
And Vegemite is the business although I haven’t met an American who will actually eat it (I feel the same about Hershey chocolate). And I believe it can’t be imported into the US.
by Auswolf on
Dec 2, 2008 1:25 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've never actually seen vegemite...
…nor have I met an American who has tried it.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 3, 2008 10:09 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just thought of the irony
of you posting pictures of your basement after Wittman’s comments – dude you’re just giving him ammunition! ;)
by plinytheelder on
Dec 1, 2008 4:46 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
the most obvious trade
We send the wolves to seattle for another starbucks.
I’m pretty worried about the future of this franchise when the best that the most obsessed fans can hope for is blowing up the team again, and leaving ourselves another tier down talentwise and again hoping for what, exactly. A top star moving to a small market in an ice cold town with a front office that shipped out then flamed the best nba player (by a long long ways) to ever grace this franchise. Or are we hoping that Ricky Rubio will have a bigger impact than Lebron James.
by midlife crisis on
Dec 2, 2008 12:21 AM CST
reply
actions
1 recs
You know,
I think this is one of the best comments that’s ever been posted here. Maybe I’m just still depressed about last night’s pathetic game – worst game of the year? maybe I’m exaggerating. But I think we forget too often that not only did Taylor trade KG – which is understandable in some way, or can at least be explained – but then, as midlife crisis says, he flamed him after he left. This to me is what is inexcusable, and what makes me so damn pessimistic – not for this year or next but for the franchise itself. Here’s a guy who left everything he had on the court for a decade…and then as soon as he leaves Taylor trashes him? Which makes me respond to all those “fire McHale” posts: I agree, but how can McHale be viewed without Taylor? They have an absolutely symbiotic relationship. And Taylor obviously is the one guy who can’t go anywhere.
How can there be any hope for this franchise when this is the mindset from the very top of the franchise?
I wonder if Taylor’s post-trade anti-KG comments, more than anything else, are what makes this franchise seem, to the rest of the league, like an absolute joke.
by plinytheelder on
Dec 2, 2008 10:02 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed.
I read it after making a fire McHale/blow it up post which made it even better.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on
Dec 3, 2008 9:44 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs











