This is who you are
The running joke here at Hoopus is that Our Beloved Puppies are actually Our Beloved Zombies. They are who they are and it isn't in their nature to be a defensively-minded squad that slogs their way through slow tempo games with lots of crawling 1/2 court sets. They have one of the quickest and poorest shooting point guards in the league. They have a bowling ball of a combo guard. They have a combo forward who can hit mid-range jumpers and the occasional 3. They have a certain 6'4" 6th man with one of the sweetest spot-up jumpers in the game. They seem to thrive when then tempo is ratcheted up and chaos reigns supreme. Even their best player seems to be more effective in this sort of setting, but we'll get to that later.
Last night at halftime, just after the Gimmie a Minute segment with Ron Howard, the Knicks broadcast team wondered out loud what was wrong with their club, and why they were losing to the lowly Zombies. Was it defense? A lack luster approach to the game? Too much time off during the holidays? Why was this 11-win team getting hammered by a squad that had not yet won in December?
Unfortunately for Al Trautwig and his crew, they weren't able to come to the obvious conclusion: the Knicks are every bit as bad as, if not worse than, OBZs. They simply have a really, really good coach with a system that not only keeps their sub-par talent in a fair amount of games, but also should put smiles on the faces of the players' agents. Injuries or not, there is no way on God's green earth that a team with a starting 5 of Nate Robinson, Chris Duhon, David Lee, Wilson Chandler, and Al Harrington has more talent than the previously 0-for-December Zombies.
Like OBZs, the Knicks have a roster filled with below-average players. They have only 3 guys with above-average PER. They don't seem all that interested in playing defense. They take a lot of 3s but they don't even have a single player who shoots above 40% from beyond the arc. Were Hoopus to have more access to the squad we could probably make a determination that the Knicks have a superior culture thanks to their excellent coach and GM, but with the way Starbury has been/is being handled, I'm not so sure that would turn out to be a winning assumption.
Basketball is not rocket science. You don't go to war with the players you want; you go to war with the players you have. The Knicks have been fighting all year with Rummy's philosophy firmly in mind. It may not work on the battlefield, but it sure as hell works for under-manned clubs on the basketball court.
Getting back to the game, the Wolves are now shooting 50.1% from the field in their wins and 41.5% in their losses. This isn't that far removed from the Knicks' 49.3% in their wins and 40.1% in their losses. The main difference between these two teams is that one franchise understands that volume is its friend and the other does not. Right now that's the primary difference between 5 and 11 wins. Shoot, shoot, shoot. 3, 3, 3. Drive, drive, drive, and play as much situational defense as you can along the way.
OBZs are now 5-0 in games where they shoot over 47% from the floor. I'll say it until I'm blue in the face: volume is their friend.
Last night's game also showed what up-tempo can do for a set of guards with some fairly obvious weaknesses. It turns them into functional NBA players. At the 1/2 the Wolves had a pace of 104, an eFG of 57.5%, a FT/FG of 42.5, a TOr of 15.4, and an ORebr of 10.5. While we have been singling out ORebr as the lone bright spot of this club, perhaps it's time to take yet another lesson from the D'Antoni Knicks and send more men back in transition once a shot goes up early in the possession. The Knicks are 28th in the league in OReb%. They also collect the 8th most defensive rebounds in the league. If there was a complaint about last night's game, it was that the Wolves allowed the Knicks to crash the offensive boards to the tune of 18 Orebs. The Wolves had 4. That, by itself, is not a problem (even if the shots are not falling) as long as they pull a Knicks (or a Spurs) and collect as many defensive rebounds as possible. OBZs currently collect the 24th fewest defensive rebounds in the league. If they are going to play zombie ball, they need to address this problem immediately.
Getting back to the guard play, last night at the 1/2 the Zombies had 3 functional guards on the court. Bassy played to the hometown crowd by going for 6 and 5, Randy Foye had 15 and 2, and Shaddy came off the bench to do what he does best: catch and shoot, getting 11 points on 3-4 from beyond the arc. Gentlemen, this is who you are. Bassy, you drive and kick or get to the line. Foye, you be a bowling ball to the rim and spot up for as many 3s as possible. Shaddy, you camp out beyond the arc and put that sweet stroke to good use. I'm not sure why it took so long for a game to play out like this, but perhaps it was simply a matter of the Zombies looking in the New York Knickerbocker mirror and realizing that while they may not be the prettiest team in the league, they sure aren't 4-win ugly.
This sort of guard play also has tremendous benefits for the head zombie, Big Al Jefferson. Ever since his big dunk against Yao Ming Al has begun to realize that he needs to add a little more brute to his low post dipsy-doo. Al may have access to all sorts of nifty finesse moves, but he is also a destroyer of men in the paint. Once it became obvious that Minny was fielding a squad with 3 guards who were doing what they were meant to do (and doing it well), Al was able to go full-on brute in the 3rd quarter, with 9 points, 5 boards, 2 assists, and a +13. To use a football analogy, Al is your late-game bruiser running back. He's the guy you give the ball to after the other team is stretched out and tired of running after an effective 3 guard rotation. Now that, my friends, is a kick ass offense. On a quick side note to all of our Vikings fans in the audience, don't you feel much better knowing that the Williams Wall simply cheated for money rather than cheating for additional muscle mass? Is steroid use one of the 7 Deadly Sins? I'm pretty sure greed is. Anywho...
I'd like to point out two specific plays that I believe speak well to the future of this club if they prove to be the beginning of a trend rather than a collection of outliers, and they both involve Mr. Telfair. Early on in the 4th, Bassy received the ball beyond the arc with an open look at a 3. He lined up his shot and instead of pulling the trigger he waited for his defender to move towards him before turning on the jets, getting into the lane, and kicking it out to a wide open Shaddy for a beautiful 3 point shot. With about 2:20 to go in the quarter he received the ball in a similar situation; instead of taking the shot, he waited for the defender to move his balance towards the perimeter before making a herky-jerky drive to the rim for a layup. While I'm not sure that Bassy will ever develop a mid-range game to go with the game of the name I'm about to drop, these two moves were taken directly out of the Tony Parker Play Book for Point Guards Who Can't Shoot 3s Well. Bassy ended the game with a single 3 point attempt. He had 8 assists and 13 trips to the line. Bassy, this is who you are. No floaters, no threes, no mid-range jumpers. Get to the rim or kick it out. If he could only learn to use the baseline a bit more, we'd be on to something. (BTW: Bassy also had a beautiful wrap-around no-look pass in the 4th that eclipsed Al's dunk over Yao and Miller's game winner against the Thunder as the Zombie play of the year.)
Wrapping this thing up, during the game we learned that Nate Robinson will once again be in the NBA All Star Dunk Contest. Really? Have we all forgotten about all the misses during his last go around? I get that he's really short and can jump out of the gym, but come on. The guy is also one of those players who really makes me dream of the days where enforcers once roamed the NBA paint. Last night he put a hard foul on Rodney Carney (who had a nice game BTW) and he then stared down Carney. I don't know about you, but were I coaching the Zombies this would be the point in the game where I call Brian Cardinal's name and tell him that the little guy doesn't enter the lane without an elbow to the chest for the rest of the game. It's not about being dirty; it's about restoring the balance of nature, or, as Ian MacKaye would say, small man, big mouth. Last night the small man with a big mouth tried to make a Knicks v. Wolves game a Robinson v. Bassy contest and his team lost. That tells you all you need to know about Nate Robinson. I'll let Ian end the post:
Compete, compete, do it for the boys
Empty barrels make the most noise
You're always on the move
You've always got something to prove
What the (censored) are you fighting for?
Is it because you're five foot four?
You better be happy with what you've got
You'll never get any more
You laugh at a man when he tries
You're trying to make up for your size
To you life is a rivalry
Keep a step ahead of me
SMALL MAN, BIG MOUTH
Knicks fans should be ticked that their point guard wasn't about the team last night.
BTW: Take a look at the Four Factors from last night's game. We may not see something like this again for quite a while:
| Pace | Eff | eFG | FT/FG | OREB% | TOr | |
| MIN | 99.0 | 121.2 | 60.1% | 41.9 | 11.8 | 14.1 |
| NYK | 108.1 | 45.0% | 28.9 | 36.0 | 16.2 |
Congrats to the team for getting the December monkey off its back and let's see more like this please. 25 threes/game, a pace above 95, 25+ FTAs, and as few 3s from Bassy as possible. If you do this, it's almost enough to make me forget that Kevin Love played 8 minutes. I'll save that for another post.
PS: Why would LeBron want to play for the Knicks in 2010?
PPS: Thanks to Tony O for keeping the game thread going last night.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
"OBZs currently collect the 24th fewest defensive rebounds in the league. If they are going to play zombie ball, they need to address this problem immediately."
***coughcoughKevinLovecoughcough***
by McCleak on Dec 27, 2008 10:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Kevin Love had 8 Minutes and 13 seconds total played....
Brian Cardinal had 9 more seconds played…9!….I Know Hes a Rookie but damn Mchale.
by Tony_O on Dec 27, 2008 11:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Love sucks...
… he’s played himself out of the rotation. We’d all like to see him getting more time because it’d be smart for a rebuilding team to be developing its young players, but the blame has to rest with Love. This pick was a bust.
by Shogun on Dec 27, 2008 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if I'd go that far...
…we obviously can’t see what is going on behind the scenes, but I do think we can say it’s a bad situation for any rookie. He’s also not being utilized in anything approaching a useful manner. I’m not comparing the two, but go back and look at how the Lakers used Pau Gasol in the Celtics game. They actually set him up at the high post and let him operate in the lane. Instead of running out to set screens on the wing, he sits at the foul line and is a kickout option along with the guys beyond the line. The guy will need to be a high post forward. The guy’s confidence has to be through the floor at this point. They need to get him some shots from around the free throw line (not on the wing) and actually run a play or two for the guy. Get him 20-25 every night no matter how he plays and give him the green light within a set space near the FT line. There is zero sense in not getting this guy that much burn right now in that type of role. I don’t care what the hell he’s doing in practice or what point they’re trying to prove to him. This isn’t high school ball; he’s an investment and they need to make the most of it.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 27, 2008 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
PS:
By setting him up like that on offense, you let him be the only rebounder on a guard drive to the hoop. The other 3 get back. On a jumper, he and Al go for the offensive board and the other 3 get back. They’re giving him the Ron Gardenhire Jason Bartlett/Kubel treatment; jerking him around for no other reason but control…and unlike the Twinkies, they aren’t winning.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 27, 2008 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously
I didn’t watch the game, but was eating at Champs in Richfield (in MN for the holidays) and they didn’t even have it on any of their TVs (was it not on?). Anyway, I was following the score on espnews and waiting for that 4th quarter collapse to come and yet it didn’t, so kudos to the Zoms. With regards to Love, I don’t get it either. They did this was Foye, too, initially, limiting his minutes because he was a rookie, but I say, hey, if you suck as a team why not play your future and build their confidence through playing? I thought this would change when McHale came in, but he seems to be in love with Smith right now. Again, who has a bigger future on your team, a guy you barely re-signed in the off-season or your first round draft pick? Can’t Love give you what Smith’s giving? Maybe not the sweet runner, but for sure the points and definitely more pop on the glass (offensive esp).
p.s. Can we petition the NBA to have the team name officially changed to Zombies? I would definitely buy some merchandise. We’ll get Rob Zombie to be our mascot. We can turn into the Washington Generals meets WWF meets slasher flick NBA team. It’s better than Overbeck.
by BDavige on Dec 27, 2008 12:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a model for the Zombie mascot

by PoorDick on Dec 27, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's kind of hard to believe...
… that that Zombie is a top 50 NBA player of all time.
by Shogun on Dec 27, 2008 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Love
SnP: We disagree about Love’s ceiling and long-term value, but we’re in full agreement that he is being misused when he’s out there. I think putting him in the high post, a la Gasol, would be a good experiment. Playing him on the wing in a pick-and-roll game hasn’t worked, nor has putting him on the block (in the limited number of times he’s gotten, at least). Really, the only thing we haven’t tried is putting him in the high post. For some reason, Rhino gets lots of opportunities there but Love doesn’t. That’s where Rhino gets the ball to face up and set up his dribble drive/floater move. But Love could potentially be a nice playmaker from the same spot. Hopefully that would work out, because if it wouldn’t, we’d be out of options with him, at least as far as finding a spot on the floor where he can be an effective offensive weapon.
by Shogun on Dec 27, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also...
… you’re right about Love’s confidence having dropped through the floor. He looks like someone killed his puppy. It’s a far cry from the brazen statements he was making in the pre-season when he told Big Al, “you’re going to love playing with me” and his early season Christian Laettner-esque statements (albeit in MUCH less condescending way) about how each loss was hard, “because he’s never lost this much.”
In addition to his on-court struggles, part of the reason I’m so down on Love is that I feel like McHale and Love’s reps pulled a major dupe job (see SnP’s Charlie Brown having the football pulled away references) in selling the draft pick to the fans (and probably to his colleagues and boss). For all the pre-draft worry that Mayo was all hype, there was a RIDICULOUS amount of unwarranted Love hype prior to the draft, much of which now appears to have been false advertising. Overblown reports about his ‘well-rounded game’, his weight loss, his outlet passing, his full-court shooting ability, his ‘basketball IQ,’ his vertical jump, just about everything. All of this obscured the fact that in recent memory there’s never been a player who at all resembled Love who was a star in the NBA. Then Love reported to training camp overweight, out of shape, and started getting dominated by his role player teammates. The lackluster conditioning and performances have obviously carried over into the regular season. I’d say that fans were more misled about Love than about Mayo, the latter of whom has pretty much played exactly to his pre-draft scouting report. Again, this can’t all be pinned on Love, and I know that he hasn’t been put in the optimal situation, but I think in two years we’ll look back on this draft and all feel gullible because of how McHale and Love’s representatives pulled one over on us.
by Shogun on Dec 27, 2008 1:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A couple things to wait on before judging the trade and Love a failure
1.2-guards excel sooner than PFs in the NBA game.
2. See what the inevitable Mike Miller trade brings
3. Mayo’s a year older than Love
4. Mayo’s playing twice as many minutes lately as Love
5. Mayo’s the offensive focus of his team, while Love rarely starts
6. A double-double big man is harder to find than a jump-shooting 2-guard
7. Do you think Mayo will be a Memphis Grizzlie for life?
by PoorDick on Dec 27, 2008 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more
with this and SnP’s earlier post re Love. He’s young and there is time. As discussed the other day, perhaps he ends up a SF if he can defend the position (and gets lighter and fitter). And he would benefit from better guard play and a legit C who is a scoring threat.
While OJ Mayo is hitting some great shots from all accounts, there are plenty of nights where he uses the “Volume is my Friend” maxim. And Memphis still suck (even of their squad is better overall).
by Auswolf on Dec 27, 2008 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Many who follow it want to declare the Mayo for Love/Miller deal a slam dunk for Memphis because O.J. can score the ball, but I am not close to being ready to do that.
Fairness in I Was Wrong Act: I waited too long to declare Portland victorious in the Brandon Roy for Randy Foye Trade. bit. And O.J. Mayo is more of a pure scorer than Roy, but O.J.‘s overall game is not as good as Brandon’s and we haven’t seen anything yet from our guys.
For sure it looks like we screwed up but I will not concede that until we settle in to a coach who will be here for more than and minute and figures out how to make Mike Miller a factor. He’s injured now but at no time did I ever feel Miller properly was being used. Love has not been consistent and lacks identity. Yeah, he can rebound a little but that’s it. Thing is he’s rarely put in position to receive opportunities in a lost season where cultivating should be more important than coaching to win every game.
O.J. is given many a chance in Memphis and that’s the right thing to do. Rudy Gay’s game suffered a bit when Mayo would ball-hog but they have been more in tune of late. O.J.’s defense is middle-of-the-road and his passing/rebounding never has made me say “Wow!” and I have watched him play in patches at least 12 times.
by Tony_O on Dec 27, 2008 4:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think PoorDick and Tony_O hit all the points I would have made about Love...
…he’s in a bad spot early in his career and it’s far too early to panic.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 27, 2008 4:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lolMcHale
Who would have thought that McHale would be the one holding Love back???
by WhaHuh on Dec 27, 2008 5:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
1. While the Knicks don't have anyone even close to as talented as AL (who is overrated also),
but when you look at their complete starting 5 vs. our starting 5, their’s is still more talented.
2. Love is a BUST. Myself as well as tens of millions of other people knew this before the draft.
3. Lebron isn’t going to the Knicks, he’ll either re-sign in Cleveland or go to the Brooklyn Nets. My money is on the Nets.
by roundhouse on Dec 28, 2008 5:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















