Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

PANIC: Mayo IS better than Love (but there's nothing we can do about it anyway so don't really panic)

Over at The Daily Gopher we get annoyed by people who consistently come on harping about the same negative point over and over, but that's what I seem to be here at CH (I'm sorry) as I am perpetually frustrated with the trade for Love and the insistence by Wolves fans that Love will have a better career than Mayo.  I wanted to offer a counter post to McCleak's post where he believes Love will have a better career than Mayo. I really can move on and I'm not anti-Love, just anti-McHale for making this trade that actually made this team worse.

Of course the trade DID happen and we have no choice but to support Love and hope for the best.  I realize harping on it does no good, but neither does doing our best Ostrich impersonation and ignoring the facts.

Here is the ultimate problem with this whole trade. We had the #3 pick in the draft, with that high of a pick you absolutely should be landing an impact player and someone who has the skills and potential to be one of your two or three best players.  Someone capable of carrying your team, creating his shot in crunch time and/or locking down on defense when you absolutely need a stop.  Kevin Love is a good player but on this nor on any other team does he have the skills or potential to be a top 2 player.  Maybe a #3 option on an average team, but if the Wolves are trying to craft a championship caliber team then you used your #3 overall pick on a role player. 

OJ Mayo on the other hand has the skills and potential to be a star.  He has the skills to be a dynamic offensive player that other teams have to gameplan for and comes in as a rookie with NBA ready perimeter defensive skills. 

Below is Draft Express listed strength/weaknesses for both players coming into the draft.

Strengths
• Size • Productivity
• Strength • Strength
• Versatility • Hands
• Body control • Fundamentals
• Scoring instincts • Intensity
• Shot-creating ability w/either hand • Ability to score in the paint
• NBA 3-point range • Excellent Touch
• Catch and shoot off screens • Versatile post game
• Mid-range game • Range out to 3-point line
• Ability to pull-up sharply off the dribble • Free throw shooting
• Basketball IQ • Ball-handling skills
• Court vision • Basketball IQ
• Confidence/Swagger • Passing skills
• Ability to play multiple positions • Ability to ignite fast-breaks with outlet passes
• Perimeter defense • Rebounding instincts
• Hands in passing lanes • Winning attitude
• Work ethic • Incredibly productive
• Coachable • Very little downside
• Very productive
Weaknesses:
• Stuck between 1 and 2 • Size
• Poor shot-selection • 15-20 pounds overweight
• Low shooting percentages • Explosiveness
• Turnovers • Plays below the rim
• Reliance on outside shot • Lateral quickness
• Does not get to free throw line enough • Defensive potential
• Struggles to get by defenders • Ability to defend perimeter
• Finishing ability at rim • Upside?
• Average wingspan
• Decision making poor at times
• Year older than class

I don't even have to label the columns.  The one that lists weaknesses as lacking explosiveness, playing below the rim, lacking lateral quickness, poor defensive portentail and questions upside.  That is the guy we have on our roster.  Sure he has great passing skills and a whole list of intangibles (fundamentals, basketball IQ, winning attitude), but that takes you a lot further in NCAA than it does in the NBA.

What bothers me is that we drafted then traded a guy who has NBA ready shooting ability, perimeter defense and versatility to go along with his own list of impressive intangibles (basketball IQ, work ethic, coachable). 

A guy like Love is great to have on your team and will do a lot for the Wolves over his career.  What he will not be is someone other teams fear or gameplan for.  He will make a living off teams focusing on Jefferson and finding holes in the defense.  There is nothing wrong with this and it is useful to have on your team but WE HAD THE #3 PICK and we got a freaking role player.  Mayo on the other hand would right now be the best perimeter offensive player we have and teams would have to account for Jefferson first and Mayo second as the Wolves would have a young and dangerous 1-2 punch.  Along with the now injured Brewer that would give us two legitimate defensive players on the perimeter and two legit 20 pnt scorers.  Imagine what Foye could do as a third scoring option when teams forget about him.

The use of touches is a specious argument at best.  Mayo is getting those touches because he is capable of playing that many minutes as a rookie and has produced.  Love is also on a terrible team, why is he not getting significant minutes?  Because he isn't capable of handling them and journeymen are more reliable to Wittman (in his infinite wisdome) and are out producing him at this point.

I fail to see why being trusted with the ball, scoring 20 ppg and being compared to Allen Iverson is a bad thing.  When you have the third overall pick in the draft I'd take a rookie who has earned playing time because he CAN score and CAN play defense over a rookie who just isn't ready yet any day of the week.

Before the draft Mayo appeared to be the better player, during summer league Mayo appeared to be the better player, a month into the actual season Mayo appears to be the better player and there is no logical reason to believe that barring injuries Mayo will not have the better career.

I'm not trying to say we traded away Michael Jordan for Mark Madsen, I agree with McCleak that Love is underrated, but until actually proven otherwise I will always believe that we traded away a potential perrennial all-star for a very good role player.

I fully realize that none of this is Love's fault and I want as badly as you all do to see him succeed and be far greater than I envision he will ever be.  We all know what the problem really is (great post by the way).  Lets not try to find a specious stat to prove something that just isn't true.  Mayo is and will be the better player, it is what it is and we can move on.  Love will be fine, but next time we have a #3 pick I just hope we get a true impact player.

4 recs  |  Comment 44 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Canis Hoopus

Bench buddies

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 82 comments

Lessons from Mark

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 276 comments

Hoopus lessons from the past

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 73 comments

Hoops for St. Jude Week: March 1-7

Mar 2010 by wyn - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Here here...

And a lot of the perceived weaknesses on the draft gurus list turned out to be vital. For OJ, I think the “struggles to get by defenders” and “struggles to finish” have been prooven false even at this point. His shot selection isn’t great, but it’s pretty damn good for a rookie with all the weight on his shoulders. He’ll get better in that area. For Love, some of his weaknesses can never be improved. Explosiveness, lateral quickness, below the rim. The are all true and really cannot be changed much.

by wolfen on Dec 4, 2008 12:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

A few things...

…they’re 18 games into their rookie seasons. They play different positions and in vastly different systems. I’ve watched a few Memphis games this year and Mayo isn’t an explosive athlete who plays above the rim. He’s a jump shooter who is off to a very nice start on his career. If you break down their games, Mayo has a superior eFG, pts/36, PER, and % of Tmpos. Love has more oreb/36, a better eff/40, a higher ws/40, more pts/pos, more ft/fg, a higher % of team rebounds and oreb, a better ppr, a better a/to rate, a better to-r, and a better reb-r. Mayo has the ball a ton and shoots a lot. Love is finding ways to win the battle in terms of oreb, to, and free throw shooting. My guess is that by the end of the year he’ll be within 3-4 points of Mayo on eFG, effectively handing Love an overwhelming four factor victory. You can see these trends in on/off numbers as well.

http://www.82games.com/0809/08MEM4.HTM#onoff

Mayo’s only net positive is with eFG%. Love carries a net gain in FT, TO, points, and total rebounds.

My argument here is that Mayo is not the impact player we all were looking for. He’d have close to the same numbers here on the Wolves and they’d still have 4 wins…just like Memphis. Ultimately, he’s a 2nd tier player masquerading as a first option. He’s Joe Johnson and Gilbert Arenas. Love is something else all together. He’s an upper, upper level role player; the type of guy that really brings a team together. Already you can see how he has adjusted his game. Check out his last 5 game hotspots:

http://www.nba.com/hotspots/

He’s become a scrapper down low and a guy who can finish the pick and pop near the top of the key. He can make a looooonnnnnnngggg and very effective career out of this blueprint. He gets to the line and keeps a ton of possessions alive. He’s a gamer and while he may never make an All Star game, my bet would be that in 2 years if an upper level team had a spot to fill on their squad they’d come running for Love over Mayo. He fills more needs than Mayo: offensive rebounding, doesn’t turn the ball over a lot, and gets to the line. I think he’ll eventually catch up to Mayo with shooting percentages. Maybe not this year but within a short time.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 4, 2008 12:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

PS:

I should have first said thanks for the excellent fan shot. Much appreciated. I’ll rec it so it can be up by the pro-Love post. I’ve been thinking of a way to keep track of the Mayo/Love debate. Maybe we can agree on a series of stats we can keep track of throughout the year. How do you think they should be measured?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 4, 2008 12:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

PPS:

I also should ask how the unathletic, below the rim talk doesn’t apply to Big Al. I’ve been down court side with this team and they’re the same size. They run at about the same speed. I think they can jump just as high.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 4, 2008 1:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Al

has offensive quickness that Love doesn’t. That is the main difference. He is not a great leaper, I agree. But he’s a quicker leaper and has quicker offensive moves. Other than that, ya, you’re right, they are very similar physically, can’t argue with that. But that is Al’s bread and butter, his offensive quickness and craftiness. Love simply doesn’t have the quickness, both jumping quickness and moving lateral quickness, to do the types of things that Al does offensively. Never will. That is why I hope he develops his outside game like Brad Miller.

by wolfen on Dec 4, 2008 1:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"he’s a quicker leaper "

exactly, same as what I said in the other thread. Love had high jump on the combine result but had time to gather there. Though his getting offensive rebounds shows his making up for it on with positioning and probably excellent timing and insight.

by Wim (Belgium) on Dec 5, 2008 9:32 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My suggstion:

would take a bit of work, but I think we can put together reasonable. I say we take the major categories (PTS, AST, RB, FTA, TO) on a /48 basis. We take those numbers and put them as percentage of the average for the position (for example, if the average SG has 4 rebounds/48 and Mayo has 8, he has a 200). We do the same for the four factors, using eFG, FT/FGA, Orb/48, and TO% as the guideposts. That’s not exactly the FF, but it works well for what we need without having to do crazy maths to get it done.

by McCleak on Dec 4, 2008 7:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that's fair...

…I’m a big stickler for also measuring the percentage of team possessions and how many points the player scores per possession but I could go with a basic four factor comparison related to the league average at the position. How about on/off? Should we work that in there somehow?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 4, 2008 8:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

On/Off should definitely be in there

since it’s a direct, simple comparison. Points per possession is another on that should be added (I’m a big believer in it as well, my mind just blanked on it). I’ve never thought percentage of team possessions as being as that useful (I think PPS and the four factors cover the matter just as well), but it would provide a very good context for how much Mayo is involved on his team, especially compared to Love.

by McCleak on Dec 4, 2008 8:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Big Al isn

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Dec 4, 2008 1:10 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

oops :)

Big Al isn’t all that athletic either but he does have an explosive first step AND an inch or two on Love (I’ve stood next to him in the locker room, he is NOT 6-10). Watch AJ on this pump-fake-drive to hoop, that is a quick first step. In some ways though AJ has the same problems. He’s a post in a PF body. His lack of athleticism hurts him as well on the defensive end. Love will be the same thing except not nearly the same post scorer and a better passer.

To what you said above, I’m not sure any stats are good for comparing as they obviously play different positions and roles. Mayo is going to carry the load and be asked to be a #1 or #2 option on his team. Love may be, like you say, a sought after commodity by a championship caliber team but it will be as a role guy (read 4th option). Which would be perfect for him. I completely agree that is a great spot for him. But we had the #3 pick and we are years from championship level, that is the problem with this trade.

With Mayo we obviously lose Love and we replace Miller with Mayo who is right now a better scorer and gives us someone who can actually play defense. Here again I agree that we would still be terrible but the Wolves can market a 1-2 punch of Mayo-Jefferson who combine for 35 ppg. Or a 1-2-3 with Foye in there. That is marketable, that gives me even a little optimism for the future (I only need a little). You can’t market a role player to go along with your other undersized C/PF.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Dec 4, 2008 1:33 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good post.

I like to read anything that bashes the trade, while giving Love his due as a pretty good ballplayer. Imagine a team with Mayo, Jefferson, and one of the big centers in next year’s draft (Thabeet or Mullens). Damn. That might challenge Portland’s 2-4-5 trio of Roy-Aldridge-Oden.

by Andy G on Dec 4, 2008 3:52 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to pretend . . .

. . . that I didn’t read that last sentence.

by PoorDick on Dec 4, 2008 6:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha.

The Oden vs Thabeet/Mullens is a stretch. But Mayo could easily become as good as Roy, and Jefferson is already about the same as Aldridge.

by Andy G on Dec 4, 2008 8:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to pound my head against a brick wall

until I can’t feel pain anymore if we draft Mullens. What is actually more likely to happen is that we’ll draft Jennings, DeRozen, or Thabeet and trade them for Mullens. YAY i’m so excited.

by roundhouse on Dec 5, 2008 1:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's beginning to look...

…like Mullins may not be good enough to declare after his freshman year.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 7:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't Mullens supposed to be a stud?

I thought I’ve seen him rated near the top of next year’s class…but I only saw about two minutes of his game vs Miami, the other night—he never touched the ball, except when he rebounded it.

by Andy G on Dec 5, 2008 8:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He was supposed to be...

…but has severely underperformed so far. He’s very, very raw.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 8:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So was Bynum...

and the athletic 7-footers that aren’t raw, are ALWAYS the number 1 pick…

I’m sort of thinking about this in two different ways. First, I would really like the Wolves to look better on offense, and guys like Mullens or Thabeet are not going to make that happen. Second, (or, HOWEVER) even if we draft DeRozan or Jennings, I don’t think Wittman would have a clue how to use them, and they would look just as average as Foye has. Watching JJ Barea light it up last night for Rick Carlisle (who also has gotten production from Cupcake Green) made me realize that the good coaches get more out of their players than people would expect and the bad coaches get less. Very simple concept, but it hasn’t hit home like this for me until a runt like Barea was looking better than a much-more gifted Randy Foye.

So, unless we get a good coach, I don’t think Rubio/Jennings/etc will help much…there won’t be an offensive identity, so we might as well take Thabeet and try to get as many offensive rebounds as possible.

by Andy G on Dec 5, 2008 9:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

so true

Wittman thinks he is Bobby Knight because he acts like a tough guy and grits his teeth a lot. But Bobby was a teacher, Wittman has no clue how to teach, just yell.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Dec 5, 2008 9:19 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

From the 4 letter:
B.J. Mullens, C, Ohio State
On potential, Mullens might have been the most intriguing name in the draft coming into the season. However, after his first three games at Ohio State, you wonder whether he has what it takes to deliver in a big way as a freshman. Mullens has great athletic ability, but it’s clear he’s still learning the game and not ready to be playing 30-40 minutes a night.

Thad Motta seems to be willing to be patient with Mullens. It looks as though NBA scouts will have to be, too. By September, some scouts were projecting him as a potential No. 1 pick. Right now, it looks as though the best-case scenario would be his returning for his sophomore season.

He doesn’t even appear to be at the Javelle McGee level yet.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, if he’s 7’1" and athletic (no clue if he’s athletic, but I think I’ve read that he is) he’ll be a Top 10, and probably Top 5 pick. Big guys take a while to develop. That’s nothing new.

by Andy G on Dec 5, 2008 1:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't seen one thing...

in Thabeets game that says he’ll be any good in the NBA. He’s a good college shot blocker but guys who are super tall get theirs in college…. guys who are tall and leapers get their in the pros. I can’t imagine a world where he is a good offensive player.

If the wolves pick a defensive center he better be able to fly up and down the court.

On top of all that Thabeet is worthy of the all-time ugly team. This squad already had Mike Miller and Calvin Booth… do we really need to be subjected to Thabeet.

by Pants_ on Dec 5, 2008 8:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The guy scares me...

…as a top pick, and for all the reasons you cite. He plays in the middle of a zone and he has hands of stone. I worry that they’ll pick him with the top pick.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 8:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Closer to DeSagna Diop than Mutombo?

http://nbaroundtable.wordpress.com/

by NBR on Dec 5, 2008 9:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yes

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 12:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

when you have AJ you don't need a scorer in the post

You need someone to make up for AJ’s lack of defensive and rebounding skills. Thabeet is raw but he will be ready to play D and is a much improved rebounder (21 pts, 18 boards last night). The problem is that this team needs a Center and a scoring perimeter player (probably PG). We didn’t address that a year ago so this year we still sit with two primary needs.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Dec 5, 2008 9:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd argue...

…soon to be three, as Foye won’t last at the 2 spot. He’s a 6th man. Has been since the day he was drafted. He may as well have come with a sign around his neck: “Hello, I’m Randy Foye, a NBA 6th man.” This draft is pretty thin at the center spot. Thabeet may be the closest pick available.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 12:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just to be clear...

…they certainly could do a lot worse than Thabeet with the Heat pick but I just worry they use the big one on him. That one needs to be for a true point or perimeter scorer. Hell, maybe the top 2 picks need to be on guys who can play outside. Curry and Evans as next year’s starting backcourt.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If the first pick is in the Top 5 (which is a big assumption, given that we SHOULD improve our record to get to a 30-32 win pace) we can’t take Curry, with it. I like Curry a lot, but you just don’t take scrawny little guards, with sweet jumpers, in the Top 5. Nobody else will, either, though so maybe we can grab him with the Heat pick or our first pick, if it’s more like 8 or 9.

by Andy G on Dec 5, 2008 1:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Jackson (at the time)....

…and AI were both scrawny. I think this draft is thin enough were you could see him go top 5. It all depends on who comes out.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Iverson was an athletic freak of nature—but Abdul-Rauf might be a pretty good comparison, actually.

by Andy G on Dec 5, 2008 2:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m slightly surprised by the fact that everyone already thinks Love won’t be an “all-star”. I think a lot of people are to quick here categorizing a player who’s main strength isn’t scoring as a role player. A lot of Love’s strengths are the same as KG’s … making others better, passing but still dangerous enough to score too, rebounding, etc… those kind of things can make you an all-start too, it isn’t about the scoring only…

I don’t think the 3rd pick immediately means you have to get an all-star. It was clear-cut the 2 first picks were can’t miss. But who was the 3rd BPA changed all year. Mayo started as the consensus 1st pick and then dropped and rised all over the top10. It was only in the last few weeks he was declared bpa for nr3. Yes, he had a chance to be an all-star but so does Love in my opinion.

As an all time Kobe-hater I’m not crazy about guys who can get points but don’t per sé make the team better; mayo has that same thing in him. If he can’t hit his shots, there’s not much else he brings to your team.

For the once who haven’t read it elsewhere, even though I’m the Thabeet drummer I agree with the fact that it’s scary that Thabeet only stands in the middle of a zone on defense. Out of all college players I watched him the most last year and it’s true. Just standing there makes everybody think twice about trying anything .. and if they do, he’s ready but yes, it is absolutely scary to think you’d pick him with a high pick and then notice he can’t transition to the NBA .. but it’s also soooo intriguing that you’d pick him with a slightly less high pick and it turns out his game translate perfectly. It could instantly heal our perimeter D (guards being able to tighten up a lot).

by Wim (Belgium) on Dec 5, 2008 9:55 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

lol what a funny typo “once > ones”

by Wim (Belgium) on Dec 5, 2008 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice points...

…and I think it’s good to remember: Steve Francis (pseudostar if there ever was one) was an all-star. Antonio Davis was an all-star. Wally was an all-star. Joe Johnson, sh*t you could go back to World B. Free. (I get a t-shirt for mentioning him.) Now how about some non-all-stars: has Mike Bibby ever been an all-star? Bibby is 5x the player Francis ever was. Must be a bunch of cases like this but I’m too lazy or ignorant to think of them.

by plinytheelder on Dec 5, 2008 12:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Brad Miller = All Star

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 12:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Toine...

…and Sharif Abdur Rahim are two others that come to mind.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 5, 2008 1:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ugh...

…those are indeed good examples. ;)

I actually feel guilty for throwing Davis in there because the year he made it he was putting up great meat-and-potatoes numbers, and he actually replaced somebody who couldn’t go. Plus I always really liked him. Oh well.

by plinytheelder on Dec 5, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

KG and LOVE???? really?

Maybe they had some similarities but KG also had what Love is missing. Size, athletic ability, explosiveness.

The point isn’t making All-Star games, the point is being one of the best two or three players on your own team. Which is exactly what you need from a #3 overall pick. Mayo instantly gives the Wolves a 1-2, inside – out threat. Today we have a 1 man show.

I too am not a fan of Kobe, but he does make players better and his team better. When he is not scoring his defense is still top notch.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Dec 5, 2008 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t really follow the semantics here. I thought a “superstar” was defined as someone who plays in the all-star game. How do you define superstar then and what’s the difference with a role players. Because in my view, every player fills certain roles on a team, for instance, kobe’s role is getting points and playing good d. It’s how good you are at it that makes the difference between a superstar and a role player … if that’s the definition, Love will be a superstar, hands down.

If the definition is being the best 1-2 player on your team, he’ll be a superstar by the end of the year, if not now.

Good point on Kobe.

Beater of the early Thabeet drum

by Wim (Belgium) on Dec 6, 2008 12:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AL gets his

but doesn’t really make the team any better.

by roundhouse on Dec 7, 2008 11:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

20/10 with nothing else

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 8, 2008 7:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Mayo will be a Nba superstar in the following days…what a player!

by Mirk on Dec 6, 2008 12:00 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Casper's 2010 Big Board and Mock Draft 3-08-2010
No-seagulls_small
Fake Wolves Team Recap from the Future
Small
Defensive player of the year
Twolves_small
A conversation between Kahn and Rambis

Recent FanPosts

Small
a rare optimistic take on the Wolves, courtesy of TrueHoop
Small
The votes are in!
Rickyrubio_small
Two Lists of Players, Free Agents, and Prospects we should look at in filling our two biggest needs, an Athletic, Shot Blocking Big Man, and an Athletic, Scoring, Wing.
Small
The Charlotte Pick (dun dun dun)
Wolveslogo_small
Prowling the NBA: March 7 - How did you get so many Q's?
Small
Darko warming to the Wolves?
Small
Game Recap: Houston please don't laugh at our problem.
Flyingpig_small
2010 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
N1533160639_3437_small
Well, this is really embarrasing but it's the right thing to do

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko

    Misc:

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop