Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Manny Knocks In Five, D'Backs Drop To Second Bar-right-arrows



Why They Lost

Category In Wins In Losses % Difference
FG% 48.1 44.1 -8%
FGA 84.6 82.3 -2.7%
FGM 40.7 36.3 -10.8%

3P%

38.8 33.5 -13.7%
3PM 5.8 5.2 -10.3%
3PA 14.9 15.4 +3.2%
EFG 51.5 47.3 -8.2%
FTM 19.3 13.7 -29%
FTA 25.1 18.9 -24.7%
OREB 12.1 11.3 -12.4%
TREB 44.9 40.1 -10.7%
AST 21.9 19.1 -12.8%
TO 12.2 14.7 +17%
BLK 3.6 3.7 +2.7%
PTS 106.5 91.3 -14.3%
POSS 93.94 93.26 -0.1%

NOTE: Stats are through 80 games.  I left out the last 2 games to allow for even stat keeping, prohibit garbage time in the last 2 games, and to cut the season into 4 even 20 game blocks. 

Top 3 problem areas (largest loss differentials excluding points):

  1. FTM (-29%)
  2. FTA (-24.7%)
  3. TO (+17%)

Insignificant differences:

  1. Poss/Pace (0.7%)
  2. Blocks (+2.7%)
  3. 3PA (+3.2)
  4. FGA (-2.7)

Secondary problem areas:

  1. eFG% (-8.2%)
  2. OREB (-12.8%)

Overall, the Wolves' biggest, most glaring issue in their losses is free throw shooting, and it's not even close.  The Timberwolves are the worst free throw shooting team in the league; averaging 0.9 fewer FTM/game than the 28th place team (7.9 fewer than 1st) and 6.6 fewer than their combined opponenets. To put it quite simply, when the Wolves shoot well at the line, they are a functional and competitive team.  In their wins, they averaged 25.1 FTA and 19.3 FTM.  If these numbers were their season averages, they would be the 11th best free throw shooting team in the league with roughly a -1.7 point differential compared to their current -6.6 deficit.  For a team with a -7 point differential, there is no single bigger way they can improve their game.  It's that cut and dry. 

Four Factors:

  1. eFG% (-8.2%)
  2. FTM/A (-29%/-24.7%)
  3. TO (+17%)
  4. OREB (-12.4%)

Surprisingly, pace and FGA have very little to do with whether or not the Wolves win games.  The Wovles have a nearly equal amount of shots and possessions in their wins and losses.  Their eFG is affected equally by 3 pointers and 2 point field goals (-10.3/-10.8% respectively).  In other words: it's all about whether or not they make their shots. Simple and cliched? Yes.  True? Si. Turnovers and offensive rebounds are self-explanatory. 

Cutting to the chase, the Wolves lose because they are an inconsistent shooting ball club that turns the ball over while racking up a massive free throw discrepancy.  When they lose, they average 4.4 fewer FGM/game, 0.6 fewer 3pm/game,  5.6 fewer FTM/game, and 1.6 OREB/game while committing 2.5 more turnovers/contest.  All in all, this works out to nearly 5 lost possessions/game (including the disparity in FTA) and 10.6 ppg. 

0 recs | Comment 2 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thanks. Happy to be on the network. I can’t wait until we have a team to talk about as good as the one you write about, but I guess we’ll just have to wait.

by Stop-n-Pop on Apr 17, 2008 5:18 PM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight Timberwolves straight from Minnesota.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Edward_small_small
Rookies getting burn(ed)?
001234202_small
Olympic Quarterfinals
Small
Nets trade idea.
001234202_small
harsh words for Love
Edward_small_small
Toughts on game vs Bucks
1311_small
Your thoughts about the front court?
Edward_small_small
My thoughts on the game vs Portland
Img_2487_small
It's Only Practice, but...
001234202_small
the Jim Stack letter
001234202_small
Sign Chris Richard!

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Next Game

Sacramento Kings
@ Minnesota Timberwolves

Wednesday, Oct 29, 2008, 7:00 PM CDT
Target Center

Complete Coverage >


Managers

Dr wyn

ad

Site Meter