Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



Your thoughts about the front court?

When reports came out that Love was McHale's man, I was surprised. He's an unathletic, undersized, power forward, I really didn't see that as a good compliment to Al Jefferson (another power forward). I mean if anything it's a little redundant, they aren't radically different in their skilset. Jefferson is the better back to the basket player and Love is by far the better passer, but he (Love) still operates most effectively in the post.  Exacerbating this issue is that both players are below average defensively. I thought logically the Wolves would want to pair Jefferson with an athletic defensive minded center to help anchor the defense, a player like Dalembert, or even Brenden Haywood. I do really like a lot of the things Love brings to the offensive end,  but I'm not sure both he and Jefferson can realize all of their potential paired together.

If Love proves to be the more well rounded player (and I think he is) does this mean that Jefferson will be traded?

I really did like the trade that McHale pulled off though. You managed to get rid of most of a lot of terrible contracts (Antoine Walker?) got Mike Miller (who will really help your outside shooting). I still think Mayo will end up a better player than Love or Miller, but I expect you guys will get another good draft pick this year, maybe get Jennings or Ricky Rubio.

0 recs | Comment 106 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is...

...as stupid an analysis as I have read in a good long while.

by kurosawa on Jul 19, 2008 8:07 PM CDT   0 recs

"does this mean that Jefferson will be traded?"

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah…..heh

Bayless4Ever

by Sabonis4Ever on Jul 20, 2008 12:47 AM CDT   0 recs

Heeeey

That’s my graphic.

Pay Up

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 20, 2008 2:00 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh yeah I'm with you on the pick on Mayo

He was undoubtedly the 3rd pick, no matter what your needs are, he was the BPA. It’s really hard to tell just how good he will be, but he has the potential to be a franchise caliber guard. Whenever you get the chance to snag that player you have to go for it. I thought people had a very negative opinion of him without much to back it up. I thought he was a well spoken and very intelligent person, who is focused on improving his game. Plus he’s shown to be a play maker and intense defender. The fact that Mayo had to play on a team that didn’t have much talent meant that he was viewed by a lot of people as selfish, but I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. Either way, Memphis is really going to be a fun team, Conely, Mayo, and Gay, nice young group there.

I really like the Mike Miller acquisition too, he’s one of those great glue guys. He’s not an allstar but he could be a very important piece on a championship contender. His outside shooting is also top notch, so it will help space the floor (now if Al can make passes to Miller on a consistent basis it will help out the offense tremendously).

You are right about defense being a team concept. But there is always an anchor, on the Celtics it was KG, on the Pistons it was Sheed and TPrince, etc. Although Love may develop into at least an average defender, he won’t be great. Players like him, who lack height, lateral quickness, and athletic ability, are increasingly rare in the NBA. Even if he has good BBIQ, I don’t see him be effective guarding the new 4s of the league. Players like Amare, Aldridge, Bosh, these guys are all 2-3inches taller, really get up down the court, and also possess a great face up game. He may be able to body them up in the paint but a lot of these players now can just shoot over the top. Another thing to consider is that Love will really have to work hard on offense to be effective. Half the reason why Jefferson preforms so poorly on defense is because he has to work so hard on offense. It’s give and take. That’s why you’ll often see defensive specialists on teams, like a Bowen or a Battier. They allow your best players to have the energy to score points and make that critical play, instead of having to be dead tired from guarding the opponents best player. This is even more important in the post season, where everyone is tired.

You are also right about not drafting Lopez. If at all possible, avoid drafting white centers in the lottery. It usually ends up bad. But it couldn’t hurt to pick up a project like DeAndre Jordan, or someone like that in the second round/late first round. Jordan has the length and athletic ability to really be something on defense. Even if he never amounts to anything on offense, look how valuable Tyson Chandler is proving to be on the Hornets.

On offense, I’m just thinking that the combination may just crowd the paint too much. Especially since last year the Wolves offense looked to me like, dump the ball into Al. We had something similar in 2005, it was called dump the ball to Zbo. There wasn’t too much ball movement in either case. Right now, on the Wolves the big problem is that there isn’t a player than can facilitate for others very well (like us in 2005). Maybe Randy Foye, but to me he better as an off guard slasher than a point guard. If Al could could pass well, he could fulfill that role but right now he doesn’t have the court vision or skill to do so. Is the new offense going to be centered around having Love be the primary play maker? If he is, it’ll be really interesting to watch. We had a guy named Sabonis that did the same thing.

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 20, 2008 3:30 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh yea and..

Miller said he want’s to close his career here. If you think about it, we’re building a core here. It’s gonna be about 4 to 5 more years till Jefferson, Foye, ... reach their prime. So if it’s true, everything goes right, than Miller can still be here in that time. He’ll have 4-5 years to gell with everyone else and he’ll still only be 32-33 by then. Especially for his skill set that works out fine.

So my objection to the trade was that we didn’t get assets for down the road but I got it wrong. We got a sharpshooting player who’s gonna be our veteran down the road PLUS he’ll have time to gell with other pieces

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 20, 2008 1:18 AM CDT   0 recs

mayo-love

personally, i liked Love better since about half way through the college season. however, a big 2-guard that can defend and has some playmaking skills would be good next to foye. if the o gameplan is good, they will put up some big points running the o through love, plus he is a solid rebounder. Shot-blocking could be fixed with athletic 3.

by tkired on Jul 20, 2008 12:40 PM CDT   0 recs

Isn't Turbo supposed to be our anchor on defense?

Isn’t the FO plan and the fans’ hope is that Brewer (who is certainly athletic-if scrawny-and can play the 3) develops into the defensive touchstone of the franchise? As a rookie, he was by far the best defender on the team. He sometimes seemed like the only one :).

At this point he’s not a Bowen or a Battier, obviously, because he still can’t shoot very well (even in the limited way that Battier and especially Bowen are asked to do) and he doesn’t seem to have the high basketball IQ of either of those guys. I think he’s more athletic than either though, he’s incredibly tenacious and certainly he has instincts on defense that seem to be non-existent as far as his offense.

I am excited for the Big Al-Love combo. I think some of the concerns in this post were those voiced when the trade first went down. Namely that Love and Jefferson are too similar. That line of analysis has been dissected and proven wrong (I think) by other who did so more articulately than I could. I do think if at some point the team acquires/develops a great “athletic center”-possibly Pekovic or someone else-it might make the decision to trade Al or Love for another player(s) that would better complete the picture, but we’re a long ways off from that at this point.

by PDGirl on Jul 21, 2008 9:32 AM CDT   0 recs

Here's hoping...

...that Brewer has put on enough weight to guard some of the 3s that gave him problems last year. With Love and Jefferson at the heart of this team, they need athletic defensive wonders at the 2/3 and 4/5 to clean up any problematic matchups.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 21, 2008 9:56 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

That's the thing

When I saw him at summer league he looked as skinny as last year. That’s pretty troubling, a big thing with young players is losing their confidence and drive. He obviously knows he needs strength to be a factor in this league, but judging from his frame, he decided not to hit the weights in the off-season. He also looked really lost on offense for a second year player, jump shots are one thing, but missing layups? It looks like he’s a couple years off from becoming a good piece. But at least you have Miller right now at the 3.

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 21, 2008 6:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't think even the best defensive wing

Could overcome the seriously undersized defensive shortcomings of Love and Jefferson in the post, unless you had 3 complete LOCKDOWN perimeter defenders, which I’ve never seen on a team.

The players who can ANCHOR a team’s defense and cover up for other’s mistakes are those who ‘guard’ the basket, i.e. big men. Garnett, Hakeem, Duncan, etc. They guard guys who aren’t that mobile, stay close to the basket, which enables them to help out their teammates and react to the enemy attacking the basket. A perimeter defender can only be in one place and has to stick to their man completely; sure, they can help out but they are not in a position to anchor a defense.

Strong perimeter defense will definitely help, but no defender can routinely stop the Kobes, Lebrons, Pauls of the world—but a defensive big man CAN routinely challenge ANYONE’s shot and force them to keep the ball outside of the key, thereby forcing lower percentage shots.

There’s just so much room to cover around the perimeter, and so little in the big men area around the basket, that you can’t rely on even a hall-of-fame worthy perimeter defender to help an ENTIRE defense. Bowen’s great, but Duncan is the anchor.

The Love/Jefferson duo will be very intriguing offensively, but will flat out get DOMINATED by any big front line. They are both small for the PF position even, let alone one playing center. Shaq and Amare? Uh oh. LMA and Oden? Goodnight. Bosh and O’Neal? Bogut and Charlie? Howard and Hedo? Horford and Smith? Chandler and West? Curry and Z-Bo? Kaman and Camby? Wilcox and Swift? Yao and Scola? Brand and Dalembert? Haywood and Jamison? Duncan and Rotating Euro Big? Okur and Boozer? Diop and Nowitzki? Beasley and Haslem? Ilgauskus and uhhh… someone else? Gasol and Bynum? Hell, even Brad Miller and Spencer Hawes?

Can Love and Jefferson match up defensively to any of those guys? Obviously those aren’t all great combos (but many are), but that’s the point. Love and Al will get theirs on offense, but what they let up defensively will more than negate their offensive play—if they can get theirs on offense, since they are so much smaller than anyone else.

In a vacuum this could be a good trade for Minnesota to get Kevin Love, but when you combine him defensively with Al Jefferson you are looking at getting steamrolled down low.

I know I’ll be watching to see what happens. This team figures to be a halfcourt team, so the lack of size won’t help in a running game ala the undersized Warriors—Love and Jefferson aren’t transition players (though Love definitely can start the transition basketball).

They both could be great on their own, but they each need a big defensive center to play alongside them. From this outsider’s perspective, it spells big trouble this upcoming season.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:00 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree...

I can’t figure out for the life of me why most fans are either ignoring or lying to themselves about how Al & Love are going to get destroyed on defense.

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:15 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'd disagree...

...about them trying to be a 1/2 court team. I think they’re going to go up and down like crazy. Defense will definitely be one of the big questions heading into the season, but with players like Brewer, Carney, Miller, McCants, and Foye, I think they’re going to run and take a lot of 3s.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 9:28 AM CDT   0 recs

Run n' gunners need rebounders, so you got that

But 2 our of the 5 guys in the main lineup CAN’T play a running game. If Love was the main rebounder and outlet passer, ala Bill Walton or Kareem, that would probably work. You got good athletes around Al and Love, but they aren’t dominant athletes who can ram it down your throat with a running game, and to make up for the fact only 3 out of 5 of the players will be running.

Your best scorer will still be Al Jefferson, and that suggests you’ll be dumping the ball into him, or into Love at the high post to see what he can create.

I’m not AS worried about your offense—Foye, Love, Al, Mike Miller, Telfair, all of them can score, even if all are very undersized for their position (except for Mike Miller of course). So, instincts say run, but even though Al and Love are undersized they are not more MOBILE than other bigs to be able to beat them down court.

I agree they’ll take a lot of threes; Jefferson will demand double teams like normal and you hope he can make teams pay by swinging the ball out. You know Love will be able to handle that. I think halfcourt might be safer for your guys though (even if it’s a lot less fun to watch) because you don’t got the defenders or playmakers to win while running. Ya need turnovers, defenders, or a stellar playmaker to lead the break.

What does your coach prefer? You were more halfcourt this recent season, right?

Like I said, I’ll be very interested to see how it works. Maybe everyone can run and gun better than I am expecting. I hope that’s the case. Since your defense is soooooo small, I worry about how many stops you’re going to get so you CAN run. Hard to run after a made basket, after all.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 2:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I have to say...

...I don’t really understand these posts. This is not a team that’s out to win a championship – they’ll be happy to win 35-40 games and keep improving from there. No, we don’t have great size or dominant athletes; yes, we’ll probably struggle to defend. But, and no offense, is this really news?

by plinytheelder on Jul 25, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

And you don't want to get there...?

Yeah, I know we all can agree the Wolves are bad, that’s not my point and it wouldn’t be very chivalrous of me to come over here and do so.

I am questioning the wisdom of a Love and Al frontcourt, and wondering how it will work. You guys should know better than me, as I am an outsider.

Because the Wolves aren’t supposed to be good, any questions pertaining to the holes in the team’s key players isn’t worthwhile to discuss? What’s the point of ANYTHING related to a rebuilding team then?

Al and Love are supposed to be the core. They won’t likely go well together, so changes have to be made. You guys got a lot of talent; I’m just wondering how it fits together and what sort of team you envision. If you choose Jefferson over Love, if Foye isn’t a PG, many changes are afoot and I’m more sensing that most T-Wolves fans envision a future where Love, Jefferson, and Foye are all a part of it together.

I apologize if it seemed like I was trying to tear your team down, because I wasn’t. I’m just very curious with what’s going to happen over there in Minny-sota.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A few things:

1- It remains to be seen what type of system Witt will run.

2- Maybe “up and down” was the wrong choice of words for this club. I think they’ll have a quicker pace with more 3s and a lot of quick entries to the post.

3- I really think they are banking on Love’s outlet passing to get Brewer, Carney, McCants, and Foye out and running. At first I thought the damn thing was a gimmicky joke but after seeing it in action during the summer league, it’s an honest to god weapon that no other team in the league has. On damn near every possession he got it to a wing past 1/2 court or to the PG in full stride while 3/5 of the other team had their backs turned.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 4:45 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

His outlets impressed me as well

That really looks like a skill that will translate very well to the NBA. His passing was awesome. I watched most of his summer league games, and he really impressed me with that part of his game (and if you can’t tell, I’m sorta a Love-skeptic). The rest of what he did made me worry for the Wolves more, because he wasn’t physically superior to what most would describe to be extremely weak summer league big men.

His passing was AMAZING, so don’t get me wrong there. I just feel like the rest won’t translate to the NBA against good big men who also know how to rebound and where to position their body like Love naturally does. It’ll work well against so-so big men, even if those so-so big men can run laps around Love athletically, but I dunno about the big men you face in the playoffs someday…

Only time will tell of course, and I wish him and you guys the best of luck.

Like I said before, my worry is the nearly everyone in the starting lineup has to be compensated for in SERIOUS ways, which will inhibit everyone from playing their own game. Either too short, too slow, and no one to compensate for it.

I wish you guys had a serious athlete like a Gerald Wallace (just an example) to receive those outlets from Love, someone no one could stop and would just take it hard at the enemy defense once receiving Love’s touchdown pass. Or if you had drafted Thornton, or Julian Wright, or Thaddeus Young, an elite athlete to gallop downcourt… Brewer still has value of course, and he could definitely become up there with them. I hope he does.

This isn’t a race-based comparison, but I’ve seen a lot of people say Love’s outlet passes were Bill Walton-esque. Just two dudes who can pass well who happen to be white is all, so no one get upset I’m comparing him to a white guy…

You know, this might be idiotic, but let’s say Kevin Love becomes the great passing/rebounding PF you hope he can be—wouldn’t you be more willing to trade Al Jefferson for hopefully a fellow decent defensive big man and other parts, even though Jefferson’s fantasy numbers will always be much higher than Love?

Jefferson, to me, is a more athletic, dunking, Rich Man’s Zach Randolph. TERRIFIC scorer and rebounder, shoddy defender and passer. Forces shots. Luckily, Al Jefferson has a much, much better reputation than Randolph does, and has good to great league wide value.

Just theoritically, if Love becomes what you hope he will be, would you be more willing to move Al because he is more likely to get more in return?

SOMEONE has to be moved to fill in the massive holes.

Or, perhaps the draft will solve the problem. I know that’s how the Blazers did their rebuilding… now we hope they can get over the hump and make the playoffs this year.

I guess my main point is: who do you guys envision being the player to get traded? Even if they try as hard as they can defensively, Al and Love are just too small. I know it’s early, but the mismatched talent seems soooo evident that it’s not too early to plan for the eventual trade.

How attached is everyone here to Al Jefferson? Or Foye, for that matter?

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

boards

love will have no big problem rebounding, he’s got strength, plus will and good positioning, only a few will get away because of athleticism. he can also man up ok, but will not be great on help D.

by tkired on Jul 26, 2008 11:29 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Mortimer is the man. Finally someone that knows what they’re talking about.

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hey, thanks Roundhouse...

...I’m just trying to learn a bit more about the Wolves from their hardcore fans, and I hope I’m not being too off-base with my point of view of the team from afar.

Rebuilding is a bitch, and my Blazers were the worst team in the league just a few years ago. It’s tough, but youth and the draft is the best way to go in my opinion—especially for a fellow small market city like Minnesota.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Jefferson aint...

...going anywhere. They’ve gone all in with Jefferson and Love and there’s no walking it back at this point. The only way he moves is if Love blows up and Foye turns into an upper level point. Even then, he played the 5 last year and held his own for the most part…it was the rest of the team that sucked. Besides, 1/2 of the time, he’ll draw the other team’s center anyway (he’ll almost always get the big defender).

I’m not so much worried about defense as I am adjusted /- and Ortg/Drtg. The Wolves were horrible on both sides of the ball last year. They trotted out a lineup with Jefferson and Gomes at the 5/4. Love should make this squad a better defensive team from the get-to and there should be marginal improvement from Foye now that he has his legs fully back under him after the injury. If they can get their Drtg in the 108-109 range, they should be alright…especially if they can boost their Ortg with a young team into the same range. They’re building a team based on two main things: post play and wings who can either get up and down or hit the 3. I think that they have the potential to be an upper-level 112 Ortg kind of team. Foye, McCants, Miller, Love, and Jefferson gives them 3 guys who can shoot over 40% from 3 with a high/low post game. While they may have some issues on the defensive side of the court, I think once Love gets a year or two under his belt, they’ll cause a hell of a lot more problems on the offensive end than they’ll give up on the defensive end. Ultimately, it would be nice to see them upgrade McCants or Foye, but we’ll have to wait and see.

As for the Wallace comment: Carney is supposed to be a nice athlete. Brewer can get up and down the court and he has tremendous length. There’s no doubt about it: they blew a draft or two but they do have some athletes. Foye, McCants, Brewer, and Carney aren’t athletic chumps.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 7:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Point taken, I just think that at this point there are going to be some holes – they won’t be plugged all at once. I know you’re probably referring to the drafting of Love, but I think the FO rationale was this: we’re going to gamble that Mayo, while he might be a good player, isn’t going to be a superstar; and we’re going to take the best player available (Love) along with Miller; finally, we’re going to address the size problem – not immediately, but hopefully a few years down the road – by drafting Pekovic with the 1st pick of the 2nd round. From this perspective – and as long as Mayo doesn’t become Kobe Bryant – I think the draft makes sense, as I’m a big proponent of taking the best player available, regardless of the position (obviously Portland knows about this all too well…).

Maybe, as you say in your next post, this will mean trades have to be made down the line, but I think the FO probably thinks that this way – with a bunch of good players – they’ll be playing from a position of strength.

oh ps it’s cool in my book if you come over from another site, I think it’s good to get outside perspectives, often fans from other teams see things the home fans don’t.

by plinytheelder on Jul 25, 2008 7:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Wittman doesn’t even know how to run an uptempo team

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:17 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Don’t forget we also drafted Pekovic. From what we know he really seems like the real deal and a true first round talent.

The thing about rebuilding is that you don’t have to do it overnight. There’s still plenty of time to add a defensive minded Center. Maybe Chandler in 2010, maybe Thabeet if he develops (we got lots of picks next year), maybe Pekovic, who knows.. We’ll got plenty more chances to see who fits there. There was no one in the current draft to fit there so good thing they don’t force the issue by trying to get (either) Lopez. Getting Love in this draft does create a bit of a weakness on defense (at least on first sight) but if you can get the best big man in the draft + a veteran shooter who wants to be here + get rid of bad contracts, you do it and worry about fitting later.

So anyway, I still think Love is a better defender than people think. He does work hard, tries not to give up position and all kinds of stuff like that .. off course, he’s not Mutombu, true.

Regulars here know I love to use rotation minutes to show what I mean. Already posted it before in this topic: http://www.canishoopus.com/2008/7/3/564420/getting-to-the-bottom-of-4#comments a must read if you want to know more about our opinion of the front court.
So say we get a guy who looks like an “anchor” as you say, here’s how my rotation would look like (I’m just gonna use Pekovic’s name here)

PF: Jefferson(18mins), Love (30mins)
C: Pekovic (28mins), Jefferson(20mins)

This way you’ll have 20 minutes a game that Jefferson and Love are together on the court. The other 28 minutes you have a combination of Love+Big defensive anchor or Jefferson+Big defensive anchor.

28 minutes for Pekovic or a player who’s sole purpose is defense, that looks okay to me. Love only gets 30 minutes, maybe a little low but since the front office sees Jefferson as a combo piece, I don’t see how else they think they’re gonna do it.

This off course leaves out Craig Smith and forces Gomes to fulltime SF with Miller already there, which would make Carney/Brewer/Mccants all fully spending time at SG. So we kinda got too many players but that’s been documentend in some other posts as well.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 26, 2008 2:21 AM CDT   0 recs

Again I forget to mention something: from what I read on Timberwolves.com (and hear/saw) the Wolves are going to run, you might call it a, “opportunistic” system. If the fast break is there, we’re gonna take it and make sure we finish it. Love will outlet and the other guys will know how to finish it. Jefferson will have some time to recuperate :D.

If it’s not, we’re bringing it up to half court.

I think the first book in McHale’s dictionary is (and has been, but now he seems to be doing it more the right way:) FLEXIBILITY

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 26, 2008 2:24 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

That’s not an “opportunistic” system. It’s simply called the fastbreak and every other team in the league does it.

by roundhouse on Jul 26, 2008 8:45 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Haha

Yeah, every team tries for that. The better teams do it as often as possible… getting the easy buckets but also being able to play the halfcourt game is what championships are made of.

And strong defense is what creates those opportunities. You don’t get opportunistic/fastbreak buckets when the enemy made their basket.

This team won’t struggle to score, I’m sure. They just won’t stop the enemy from doing the same.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 4:16 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LoL

I didn’t mean opportunistic in a negative way. Anyway, just saying what I got from listening to McHale.

So to put it in other ways: he wants to get maximum amount of fastbreaks as possible…

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 10:37 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

other words

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 10:37 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh and to make my triple post complete; I agree that you need strong defense (not just good outlet passing, quick runners/athletic finishers) to create sufficient fast break points.
If McHale wants a good pace with no run and gun, just a healthy mix of guys that can shoot + a double team machine for the half court sets and on the other hand some guys that can bring it up fast (Love+Telfair, he’s quick, don’t forget that) and some guys that can finish (that’s why I hate seeing Brewer miss so many layups in the Summer League) than I’m all in for that .. He just needs to remember there’s 2 sides to the game. I’m sure he hasn’t forgotten though ^^.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 10:48 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

did you drive yourself crazy looking for this one?

by plinytheelder on Jul 31, 2008 2:20 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think that's just about right with the minutes

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 26, 2008 8:51 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm getting ya

So, Love isn’t a starter then? He comes off the bench?

That means the 3rd pick in a very strong draft was used on a 6th man?

And do you know Pekovic is starter quality? I honestly don’t know, as I haven’t heard much about him, and I ain’t totally clueless about the Euros… who does he play for?

I totally agree you need a defensive center to go around… who? Jefferson or Love? If you keep both, then one isn’t starting, which seems like bad value for where you were picking or a misuse of talent in Jefferson. That’s why I think one has to be traded some-year soon; each are starter quality bigs for someone in the NBA, but do not go well together.

I want you guys to have that anchor next to either Jefferson or Love, which is why I wonder how in the meantime Jefferson and Love are gonna fit—and since I can’t see how it could POSSIBLY work on defense against quality bigs, that duo has to be broken up in favor of a defensive post player someday soon, or forever be sorta bad.

And you’re definitely right—the draft will be a great way to fix the problem. Just seems like you gave yourself a problem by getting a guy who doesn’t fit, but if he is BPA then I definitely can’t argue. BPA will never get you in trouble like drafting for need will.

I just wondered if most Wolves fans felt like either Love or Jefferson would eventually soon be moved, because it seemed like most felt they were the core and would play together as the Wolves become great again. We haven’t seen Love in the NBA yet of course, but even best case scenario they aren’t a good match as (like we’ve agreed on) they need a defensive player aside them to compensate for their defensive weaknesses and undersized bodies.

Jefferson doesn’t seem to try on defense, but any problems Love has on defense won’t be for a lack of trying. It’s out of his control; he’s 6’8” and not very quick. As a PF, he’s gonna have a hell of a time matching up with Aldridge, West, AMARE, Duncan, KG, etc. It’s a very athletic position these days, and often guys who would play SF before (like Travis Outlaw, Josh Smith, Shawn Marion) play most of their minutes as a PF to take advantage of mismatches. Love will simply not be able to keep up with those guys, and it won’t be his fault—he’ll try as hard as he can, I’m sure.

Since you got Telfair, Foye, McCants, etc, I do not think the trade of Mayo for Love and Miller was a bad trade at all—even if Mayo turns into a star. You got the guy your front office seemed to want, plus a terrific and BIG shooter in Mike Miller. I just seriously question how Love fits on a team where Al Jefferson is the best player, since they have many of the same weaknesses, so basically I do agree it’s a problem to fix later—but it has to be fixed, and that means one will likely be traded.

Since Jefferson will put up bigger numbers, I vote it will be Jefferson who has more value and will get traded (provided Love is good of course). Making Love the 6th man doesn’t seem like a good use of his value, but I could be wrong.

I’m sure things will get fixed over time. The next lottery pick could be the one that puts you guys over the top and back on the playoff train in no time. I like what you guys got going on, but like I said (probably too many times) I’m just curious about how it’ll fit from a T-Wolves fan’s perspective.

Like the post you directed me to showed, Al Jefferson did do well as a center, but you’d HAVE to think with his size and athleticism he’d do even better as a PF. He can definitely get by as a center, though…

Love and Al will someday soon be good enough to get to the playoffs, but it’s too small and weak defensively to win a championship. I know you guys want a title, not just playoffs. That’s the context of my questions and comments, just for clarification.

Why doesn’t the season just start so we can just SEE how it works? It’d make things a lot easier.

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it! Educate me!

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 4:10 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It's sad

that the Blazers young players/front office/owner are all so good that they’re wishing us the best of luck with our team…

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 6:27 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It ain't THAT sad

The Blazers made the playoffs 20+ years in a row, last time in 2003. Traditionally the Blazers have been pretty good. They aren’t the CLIPPERS or sumthin’!

You guys are doing what Portland did, which in my opinion is the best way to go: draft the best players you can, get rid of the dead weight contracts to whomever will take them, accrue draft picks in the 2nd round (or 1st round if you can, of course), and play the young kids while setting yourself up for caproom in a few years.

That’s how the Blazers got Roy, LMA, Rudy Fernandez, Frye, Jerryd Bayless, etc. They got lucky with Oden, but the rest was just following the plan. Now Martell and Outlaw are paying off as well, which took some time (especially in Outlaw’s case—he’s still pretty raw, and he’s entering his 6th season!).

This next summer the Blazers are also looking at around 20 million in cap space to add someone else to the Roy/Oden/LMA/Rudy/Bayless/Martell/Outlaw core.

Do you guys got cap space coming up? Adding some key free agents who want to win once Love, Foye, Brewer, Jefferson gel could speed up the process obviously.

Besides the losers who preceded Kevin Pritchard as GM and Team President, the Blazers have usually had good front office people, and were either a good or near-championship level team. So, unless I’m misinterpreting you, it isn’t THAT sad to be wished good luck by a Blazer fan!

I do apologize if I came across as condescending, of course. The Wolves will do just fine, in time.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 7:03 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Who's Pekovic?

He dominated the Serbian league the last 3 years, won last 2 Adriatic league titles with Partizan, this year is moving to Panathinaikos (winner of 10 of last 11 Greek championships and the Euroleague 2 years ago), some scouts say he’d start for all but 3 NBA teams (Phx Orlando Houston).

by plinytheelder on Jul 27, 2008 1:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh forgot to mention...

...I very much like Wim’s minutes scenarios. People were talking about Ginóbili as a possible mvp candidate last year before he got hurt, and he comes of the bench.

by plinytheelder on Jul 27, 2008 1:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Forget to mention it here (thing I did somewhere else though). Jefferson always starts, between Love and Pekovic, it depends on other teams’ starters and probably first people of the bench.

Like if their best player is an offensive powerhouse, use Pekovic. If the guy seems to be cold or he’s been playing for a while, sub in Love.

There are a multitude of scenario’s so I’m not gonna go over all of them, you get the picture.

I’m no coach but I think what any coach wants is to have as many tools as possible in his toolbox. This is why I think San Antonio is so succesfull and I’ve had the feeling that I’ve recognized some things before about what Mchale is trying to put together. I’m not sure but I think he might be thinking he wants to build a Spurs-type team. If you look at the Euro Bigs, Finley/Manu, .... whoever is subbed in or out the team never seems to be much weaker and they can change pace so quickly. Use Parker and Ginobili. You want more outside shooting (though Manu has a nice 3pt too), use Udrih (yea he’s gone now) and Finley … you can play any way you want.

Anyway, Love wouldn’t be a starter, he would still get starter minutes, that’s what (should) matters. Look at Manu (again). I know he’s a pretty isolated case but still. That team is so balanced, whenever the other team starts to go to it’s, mostly lesser defending, bench Manu is put in and he can so single handled force the opposing team’s coach to go back to his starters or at least some of them. Whenever you can mess with the opposing teams’ game plan. that’s good.

Love could be similar. You start out with Telfair as the guy who organises the offense, dumps it to big Al. Then when the other team will start to go to their bench you can put in Love, sub out Telfair and use Randy at the point. You can organise your offense through the High post with Love their and use Foye more as a combo (since that’s what he is, that sounds good, right?).

On the defensive end; if you can somehow match the 20 minutes of bad defense (Love + Jefferson together on the field) with the 10-18 minutes of resting time of the other team’s best offensive player.

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end so that would force them to get down on the minutes of the opposing team’s best offensive player and still have the upper hand (because when the other team’s best player is on the floor, it’s not really a problem that our defense isn’t that bad).

WOAH, anyone still following? I know this is AWFULLY theoritical and hypothetical BUT you the point remains, if you’ve got players that can do a multitude of things and you have different types of play you can use AND you’ve got a coach who knows how to use them then I’m sure you have a good chance of winning games .. ESPECIALLY in the playoffs, that’s where the strategy things comes to it’s peak.

On Love being a 6th man and it being low value of a 5th pick I’ve only got this: if a 5th pick is the 6th man and helps his team win a championship, that’s plenty of value to me. As long as his contribution is big enough (read: minutes are important, not starting/bench).

At first I wasn’t all to happy with Love because I also tought he duplicated so much of Jefferson and he was also undersized (McHale said he things the league is getting smaller so that Love isn’t undersized, we all know, to say it in a cool way “he’ trippin’”).

BUT, the more you look at it, the more you realize a team is too complicated to just say that there’s no way that two players that aren’t perfectly compatible couldn’t be together on a succesfull team.

Off course, once the season starts I could look like a total idiot when we get dunked on 33 times a night, after all, what do I know (still nice to pretend though :D)

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:23 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ok that part was hard I'll try it again

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end so that would force them to get down on the minutes of the opposing team’s best offensive player and still have the upper hand (because when the other team’s best player is on the floor, it’s not really a problem that our defense isn’t that bad).

This again

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end.

If the other team’s coach has to bring back their best defender this could mean that the other team’s offensive player will get less minutes because he has to go out.

Since Jefferson is a guy that can get his shot of against anyone, he would still be good defensively (not as good as without the other team’s best defender but still pretty good) + we would have not that much trouble at the defensive end because the other team’s best offensive guy has been subbed out… = We force them to do stuff = always good.

Hope that’s any more clear

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:30 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Damn I'm embarrased, that's 5 points in a row

Also would like to add, Jefferson is seen by a Combo guy by the FO. He is really a guy that has his uses at both position. If you’re gonna use combo guys you’ll always have weird things with starting <> bench positions, always, because that’s what combo guys do, they try to change the makeup of a team so if they’re switching according to whats happening in the game you’re always gonna have players that play less or more minutes according to mathups.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

No I'm not offended or anything...

just thinking that the Blazers will probably stomp all over us as they win the division for the next 10 years.

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 8:30 AM CDT   0 recs

I don't see it...

...I’ll have a post on it a bit later, but I don’t see the Blazers being an upper level team. I think injuries and too many shooters will eventually do them in. There’s more to it but I think they’ll top out at the same level as the Wolves: right below the top 2 teams in the WC.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 10:09 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Greg Oden?

LMA? Roy?

Rudy?

Outlaw? Bayless?

Too many shooters? You can’t have too many around LMA and Oden. Roy, Bayless, Rudy are all SLASHERS who can shoot. That’s the perfect combo.

If Oden is Oden, Portland is a top level team. No way around it. They are too good at a very young age, with a very rich owner to pay everyone, to not become a top team. 3rd youngest team of all time won 41 games, no Oden, no Rudy. It’s just gonna get better. I could see your point if we didn’t have Oden—but we do. He’s very good. He’s going to be a tippity top center.

He’s also in very good health right now.

If you’re expecting injuries to do us in, well, that’s not something to hang your hat on. That’s why McHale didn’t draft Roy after all, and trying to predict who is going to be injury prone and basing decisions off of that is foolhardy at best. The less-injury prone Foye has spent most of his time hurt—not his fault, but kinda ironic considering why they took him over Roy.

If you want the Wolves to be good (and I swear this is coming from the least homery-side of me I can muster up), you must have a team that can deal with the Lakers and Portland. Otherwise, they’re just a playoff team who either gets destroyed by Bynum/Gasol/Kobe or Oden/LMA/Roy.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 5:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I get...

...that you like the team, but Oden and Roy have played exactly 0 injury free seasons. Bayless had a SL performance right up there with Randy Foye. I’ll believe it when I see it.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 5:53 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Wow S-n-P...

you’re crazy if you don’t think the Blazers can be a top 2 team and also if you think the wolves are going to be anywhere near that level.

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 6:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Come on now...

...they’ve won 41 games and they have a core that I’d trade in a second for, but it’s not crazy to think that they can’t get by NOLA, the Lakers, and Utah (if they keep it together) in the next 5 years. I think both the Blazers and the Wolves will be around 55 win teams in 3 years. That’s a pretty damn good record but it is in no way, shape, or form crazy to think that they may not win it all or get to the finals. Nobody has seen Oden play in the NBA. They’ll eventually have to start paying these guys and I don’t care how rich Allen is, the NBA has a restrictive CBA in terms of locking up a bunch of high end talent. You can get 3, maybe 4 top end guys and that’s it. Let’s say that Oden works out; he’s a max type guy, right? What about Roy? LMA is going to get 10-12 at some point in his career. My point is that I don’t think Roy and Oden will ever be more than Paul and Chandler or, to borrow from another pair that hasn’t been tested yet: Kobe and Bynum.

How is that crazy?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 6:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Plus...

...the next time I read the words “Pritch Slapped” I’m forgetting all of my previous nice thoughts towards that franchise.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 6:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

You can pay a whole team max money

We’ll just have to continue the conversation about how good Portland will be in a year, after they had a good season. I think you’re selling the team a bit short.

There is a salary cap and a luxury tax. Paul Allen, before, has paid 50+ million in the luxury tax for a mediocre team. He is the richest owner in sports. There is nothing in the CBA about restricting what you can pay a player aside from the max.

So if Roy/LMA/Oden/Rudy/Martell/Outlaw/Bayless/etc become very good players, he can pay them whatever their fair market value is or more.

If Bayless is as good as Foye, I’m happy! He used his sheer quickness and athleticism to score 29 ppg in the summer. That won’t happen in the real NBA. But, he’s a good compliment to Roy, who is the real PG. Foye would be nice next to Roy as well, but Bayless projects to be a better defender against PGs because of his good size and extreme quickness. I like Foye though, so I take that comparison well.

Let’s say Oden only has the offensive skills of Chandler (which he doesn’t, Oden is much much much more skilled—AND a lot more athletic and big) and Roy is “only” Paul. Don’t forget about LMA, Rudy, Outlaw, Martell, Bayless, and who knows if Frye and Diogu or Sergio can become good as well. Hell, Batum is a great defender already!

I’m sorry man, I’m being as fair as I can be: you’re going to have to match up with Portland to get anywhere in the west, along with the Lakers… however, the Blazers are all in their teens or early 20s, where Kobe has 3, 4 more good years. The Blazers have 10 to 12.

The Blazers already won most of their games against NOLA, LA, and Utah. We match up with them very well.

No one in recent history have had such a collection of talent, the attitudes that want to be in a small market (Portland), and a owner who won’t blink an eye at paying them. There’s a reason the youngest and 2nd youngest teams ever won a combined 31 games, and the Blazers won 41 in a historically tough western conference.

Unless you think Oden is a bust (and true, we gotta just let him play and see) or Roy and LMA won’t improve (or Bayless or Rudy or blah blah), then only time and experience is holding the team back.

The Wolves have to get the roster to face that team, and I’m not trying to be an unrealistic homer about it. Oden is very, very good. He’s huge n’ buff yet still has low body fat and is quick, and has worked on his offense all year. He’s got the hook, the bank shot, the 18 footer, plus has retained his power.

I shouldn’t promise things for him, and I know we gotta just let him play, but my zealous fan side gets the best of me sometimes.

That’s part of where my worries about the Wolves frontline stems from. You’ll definitely, DEFINITELY make the playoffs with your current squad.

I think we can both agree we just want the damn season to start. Arguing over how good a team WILL be is silly I know, but no one is better situated with GREAT young talent and cap room. Not just good talent, GREAT talent.

I promise I will never say Pritch Slapped around here. I want you guys to match up well with us, so the small markets can take over the league.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 9:04 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs