Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


Your thoughts about the front court?

When reports came out that Love was McHale's man, I was surprised. He's an unathletic, undersized, power forward, I really didn't see that as a good compliment to Al Jefferson (another power forward). I mean if anything it's a little redundant, they aren't radically different in their skilset. Jefferson is the better back to the basket player and Love is by far the better passer, but he (Love) still operates most effectively in the post.  Exacerbating this issue is that both players are below average defensively. I thought logically the Wolves would want to pair Jefferson with an athletic defensive minded center to help anchor the defense, a player like Dalembert, or even Brenden Haywood. I do really like a lot of the things Love brings to the offensive end,  but I'm not sure both he and Jefferson can realize all of their potential paired together.

If Love proves to be the more well rounded player (and I think he is) does this mean that Jefferson will be traded?

I really did like the trade that McHale pulled off though. You managed to get rid of most of a lot of terrible contracts (Antoine Walker?) got Mike Miller (who will really help your outside shooting). I still think Mayo will end up a better player than Love or Miller, but I expect you guys will get another good draft pick this year, maybe get Jennings or Ricky Rubio.

0 recs | Comment 106 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is...

...as stupid an analysis as I have read in a good long while.

by kurosawa on Jul 19, 2008 8:07 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"does this mean that Jefferson will be traded?"

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah…..heh

Bayless4Ever

by Sabonis4Ever on Jul 20, 2008 12:47 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heeeey

That’s my graphic.

Pay Up

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 20, 2008 2:00 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At first getting a big center that can play defense was my first tought too. The thing is that there weren’t any in this draft. Not where we were picking. Pekovic, whom we got in the second round might have a bit of that in him. We’ll see in two years.

We could have reached for Lopez somehow, but be honest, Brook isn’t all that fantastic defensively and I’m not so sure he’s that great offensively if you look at the numbers. Love is by far gonna be the bitter big man.

I do agree that size can be an important factor, especially on defense.

Like you said, we got rid of the last remaining bad contracts and we’re now to the point were we have no one except Jefferson and Love under a guaranteed contract for the summer of 2010. This means if we still feel we need a defensive minded center we might be able to sign someone like Chandler in that summer.

So we didn’t get a big defensive center because there weren’t just any this year, especially where we were picking.
BUT we got ourselves in a position to get one down the road if we feel it’s necessary (either through free agency in 2010 or through next years draft (maybe Thabeet if he develops), where we’ve got quite a lot of picks that are protected.

Off course, the way the roster now is, if we have a top 10 my first option would be a PG alla Rubio, but there’s so much that can happen in one year.. We’ll see whatever happens. It’s gonna be an interesting year.

Love and Jefferson’s games might completement each other more than you’d think. Jefferson is more of a 4-5 where as Love is more of 4-3. I’m not saying Love could play any kind of minutes at the 3. By saying 4-3 I mean he’s got some skills that are mostly typical for a 4, not a 3. Especially the passing and the range on his shot.

So on the offensive end they’ll probably be great together. Teams will have to pick their poison and I’m pretty sure Love will have some great feeds to Jefferson from the start on.
You’re right that on the defensive end they’re a bit of a liability. I’m pretty sure though that Love still has time to develop there. In my mind there are two ways to play good defense. Smart and athletic. If you’re long and got pogo sticks for legs (and you look scary) than you can just make point guards think twice beforing waltzing into the paint by blocking 1 or 2 shots.
On the other hand, Love has a very high basketball IQ so I think if the perimeter defense can improve Love will surely be able to defend position in the paint and just make it hard on opposing big men, wear them out by constatly battling over position and stuff like that.
If you look at the Celtics and last years Nuggets, defense is a team concept, one shot blocking center isn’t gonna cut it.

One more thing on the trade: I really believe they picked Mayo, not as bluff, but just though of him as the pick for that spot. If Memphis hadn’t come with a deal that got them outside shooting, the best big man in the draft and cap space in 2010 I’m very sure they would just kept Mayo.
I’m kinda warm and cold on Mayo. Really didn’t like how he fit in with our team, really didn’t like what I saw from him in the NCAA games (I feel he looks like Kobe, I hate Kobe, doesn’t make others better, it’s a team game Kobe) BUT I turned around on him a bit because he seemed such a nice personality and seemed to really said the right things and wants to work.

Oh yea, Love also REALLY wanted to be in Minnesota, not a feat to be undervalued with the weather and the small market and all. We’re building a core here, can’t do that with players that’ll bail out the first chance they get (cough Marbury cough)

Sorry I’m putting in such a text, still in my bed without all four of my wisdom teeth so I’ve really got nothing better to do :D

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 20, 2008 1:14 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Oh yeah I'm with you on the pick on Mayo

He was undoubtedly the 3rd pick, no matter what your needs are, he was the BPA. It’s really hard to tell just how good he will be, but he has the potential to be a franchise caliber guard. Whenever you get the chance to snag that player you have to go for it. I thought people had a very negative opinion of him without much to back it up. I thought he was a well spoken and very intelligent person, who is focused on improving his game. Plus he’s shown to be a play maker and intense defender. The fact that Mayo had to play on a team that didn’t have much talent meant that he was viewed by a lot of people as selfish, but I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. Either way, Memphis is really going to be a fun team, Conely, Mayo, and Gay, nice young group there.

I really like the Mike Miller acquisition too, he’s one of those great glue guys. He’s not an allstar but he could be a very important piece on a championship contender. His outside shooting is also top notch, so it will help space the floor (now if Al can make passes to Miller on a consistent basis it will help out the offense tremendously).

You are right about defense being a team concept. But there is always an anchor, on the Celtics it was KG, on the Pistons it was Sheed and TPrince, etc. Although Love may develop into at least an average defender, he won’t be great. Players like him, who lack height, lateral quickness, and athletic ability, are increasingly rare in the NBA. Even if he has good BBIQ, I don’t see him be effective guarding the new 4s of the league. Players like Amare, Aldridge, Bosh, these guys are all 2-3inches taller, really get up down the court, and also possess a great face up game. He may be able to body them up in the paint but a lot of these players now can just shoot over the top. Another thing to consider is that Love will really have to work hard on offense to be effective. Half the reason why Jefferson preforms so poorly on defense is because he has to work so hard on offense. It’s give and take. That’s why you’ll often see defensive specialists on teams, like a Bowen or a Battier. They allow your best players to have the energy to score points and make that critical play, instead of having to be dead tired from guarding the opponents best player. This is even more important in the post season, where everyone is tired.

You are also right about not drafting Lopez. If at all possible, avoid drafting white centers in the lottery. It usually ends up bad. But it couldn’t hurt to pick up a project like DeAndre Jordan, or someone like that in the second round/late first round. Jordan has the length and athletic ability to really be something on defense. Even if he never amounts to anything on offense, look how valuable Tyson Chandler is proving to be on the Hornets.

On offense, I’m just thinking that the combination may just crowd the paint too much. Especially since last year the Wolves offense looked to me like, dump the ball into Al. We had something similar in 2005, it was called dump the ball to Zbo. There wasn’t too much ball movement in either case. Right now, on the Wolves the big problem is that there isn’t a player than can facilitate for others very well (like us in 2005). Maybe Randy Foye, but to me he better as an off guard slasher than a point guard. If Al could could pass well, he could fulfill that role but right now he doesn’t have the court vision or skill to do so. Is the new offense going to be centered around having Love be the primary play maker? If he is, it’ll be really interesting to watch. We had a guy named Sabonis that did the same thing.

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 20, 2008 3:30 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh yea and..

Miller said he want’s to close his career here. If you think about it, we’re building a core here. It’s gonna be about 4 to 5 more years till Jefferson, Foye, ... reach their prime. So if it’s true, everything goes right, than Miller can still be here in that time. He’ll have 4-5 years to gell with everyone else and he’ll still only be 32-33 by then. Especially for his skill set that works out fine.

So my objection to the trade was that we didn’t get assets for down the road but I got it wrong. We got a sharpshooting player who’s gonna be our veteran down the road PLUS he’ll have time to gell with other pieces

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 20, 2008 1:18 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

mayo-love

personally, i liked Love better since about half way through the college season. however, a big 2-guard that can defend and has some playmaking skills would be good next to foye. if the o gameplan is good, they will put up some big points running the o through love, plus he is a solid rebounder. Shot-blocking could be fixed with athletic 3.

by tkired on Jul 20, 2008 12:40 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Isn't Turbo supposed to be our anchor on defense?

Isn’t the FO plan and the fans’ hope is that Brewer (who is certainly athletic-if scrawny-and can play the 3) develops into the defensive touchstone of the franchise? As a rookie, he was by far the best defender on the team. He sometimes seemed like the only one :).

At this point he’s not a Bowen or a Battier, obviously, because he still can’t shoot very well (even in the limited way that Battier and especially Bowen are asked to do) and he doesn’t seem to have the high basketball IQ of either of those guys. I think he’s more athletic than either though, he’s incredibly tenacious and certainly he has instincts on defense that seem to be non-existent as far as his offense.

I am excited for the Big Al-Love combo. I think some of the concerns in this post were those voiced when the trade first went down. Namely that Love and Jefferson are too similar. That line of analysis has been dissected and proven wrong (I think) by other who did so more articulately than I could. I do think if at some point the team acquires/develops a great “athletic center”-possibly Pekovic or someone else-it might make the decision to trade Al or Love for another player(s) that would better complete the picture, but we’re a long ways off from that at this point.

by PDGirl on Jul 21, 2008 9:32 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here's hoping...

...that Brewer has put on enough weight to guard some of the 3s that gave him problems last year. With Love and Jefferson at the heart of this team, they need athletic defensive wonders at the 2/3 and 4/5 to clean up any problematic matchups.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 21, 2008 9:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's the thing

When I saw him at summer league he looked as skinny as last year. That’s pretty troubling, a big thing with young players is losing their confidence and drive. He obviously knows he needs strength to be a factor in this league, but judging from his frame, he decided not to hit the weights in the off-season. He also looked really lost on offense for a second year player, jump shots are one thing, but missing layups? It looks like he’s a couple years off from becoming a good piece. But at least you have Miller right now at the 3.

A Time For Heroes,
It's not right for young lungs to be coughing up blood
And it's all
It's all in my hands
And its all up the walls
Well the stale chips were up and the hopes stakes were down
Until Kp came into Town!
'Sing it Petey!

by Dheepan on Jul 21, 2008 6:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think even the best defensive wing

Could overcome the seriously undersized defensive shortcomings of Love and Jefferson in the post, unless you had 3 complete LOCKDOWN perimeter defenders, which I’ve never seen on a team.

The players who can ANCHOR a team’s defense and cover up for other’s mistakes are those who ‘guard’ the basket, i.e. big men. Garnett, Hakeem, Duncan, etc. They guard guys who aren’t that mobile, stay close to the basket, which enables them to help out their teammates and react to the enemy attacking the basket. A perimeter defender can only be in one place and has to stick to their man completely; sure, they can help out but they are not in a position to anchor a defense.

Strong perimeter defense will definitely help, but no defender can routinely stop the Kobes, Lebrons, Pauls of the world—but a defensive big man CAN routinely challenge ANYONE’s shot and force them to keep the ball outside of the key, thereby forcing lower percentage shots.

There’s just so much room to cover around the perimeter, and so little in the big men area around the basket, that you can’t rely on even a hall-of-fame worthy perimeter defender to help an ENTIRE defense. Bowen’s great, but Duncan is the anchor.

The Love/Jefferson duo will be very intriguing offensively, but will flat out get DOMINATED by any big front line. They are both small for the PF position even, let alone one playing center. Shaq and Amare? Uh oh. LMA and Oden? Goodnight. Bosh and O’Neal? Bogut and Charlie? Howard and Hedo? Horford and Smith? Chandler and West? Curry and Z-Bo? Kaman and Camby? Wilcox and Swift? Yao and Scola? Brand and Dalembert? Haywood and Jamison? Duncan and Rotating Euro Big? Okur and Boozer? Diop and Nowitzki? Beasley and Haslem? Ilgauskus and uhhh… someone else? Gasol and Bynum? Hell, even Brad Miller and Spencer Hawes?

Can Love and Jefferson match up defensively to any of those guys? Obviously those aren’t all great combos (but many are), but that’s the point. Love and Al will get theirs on offense, but what they let up defensively will more than negate their offensive play—if they can get theirs on offense, since they are so much smaller than anyone else.

In a vacuum this could be a good trade for Minnesota to get Kevin Love, but when you combine him defensively with Al Jefferson you are looking at getting steamrolled down low.

I know I’ll be watching to see what happens. This team figures to be a halfcourt team, so the lack of size won’t help in a running game ala the undersized Warriors—Love and Jefferson aren’t transition players (though Love definitely can start the transition basketball).

They both could be great on their own, but they each need a big defensive center to play alongside them. From this outsider’s perspective, it spells big trouble this upcoming season.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:00 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree...

I can’t figure out for the life of me why most fans are either ignoring or lying to themselves about how Al & Love are going to get destroyed on defense.

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:15 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd disagree...

...about them trying to be a 1/2 court team. I think they’re going to go up and down like crazy. Defense will definitely be one of the big questions heading into the season, but with players like Brewer, Carney, Miller, McCants, and Foye, I think they’re going to run and take a lot of 3s.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 9:28 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Run n' gunners need rebounders, so you got that

But 2 our of the 5 guys in the main lineup CAN’T play a running game. If Love was the main rebounder and outlet passer, ala Bill Walton or Kareem, that would probably work. You got good athletes around Al and Love, but they aren’t dominant athletes who can ram it down your throat with a running game, and to make up for the fact only 3 out of 5 of the players will be running.

Your best scorer will still be Al Jefferson, and that suggests you’ll be dumping the ball into him, or into Love at the high post to see what he can create.

I’m not AS worried about your offense—Foye, Love, Al, Mike Miller, Telfair, all of them can score, even if all are very undersized for their position (except for Mike Miller of course). So, instincts say run, but even though Al and Love are undersized they are not more MOBILE than other bigs to be able to beat them down court.

I agree they’ll take a lot of threes; Jefferson will demand double teams like normal and you hope he can make teams pay by swinging the ball out. You know Love will be able to handle that. I think halfcourt might be safer for your guys though (even if it’s a lot less fun to watch) because you don’t got the defenders or playmakers to win while running. Ya need turnovers, defenders, or a stellar playmaker to lead the break.

What does your coach prefer? You were more halfcourt this recent season, right?

Like I said, I’ll be very interested to see how it works. Maybe everyone can run and gun better than I am expecting. I hope that’s the case. Since your defense is soooooo small, I worry about how many stops you’re going to get so you CAN run. Hard to run after a made basket, after all.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 2:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have to say...

...I don’t really understand these posts. This is not a team that’s out to win a championship – they’ll be happy to win 35-40 games and keep improving from there. No, we don’t have great size or dominant athletes; yes, we’ll probably struggle to defend. But, and no offense, is this really news?

by plinytheelder on Jul 25, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And you don't want to get there...?

Yeah, I know we all can agree the Wolves are bad, that’s not my point and it wouldn’t be very chivalrous of me to come over here and do so.

I am questioning the wisdom of a Love and Al frontcourt, and wondering how it will work. You guys should know better than me, as I am an outsider.

Because the Wolves aren’t supposed to be good, any questions pertaining to the holes in the team’s key players isn’t worthwhile to discuss? What’s the point of ANYTHING related to a rebuilding team then?

Al and Love are supposed to be the core. They won’t likely go well together, so changes have to be made. You guys got a lot of talent; I’m just wondering how it fits together and what sort of team you envision. If you choose Jefferson over Love, if Foye isn’t a PG, many changes are afoot and I’m more sensing that most T-Wolves fans envision a future where Love, Jefferson, and Foye are all a part of it together.

I apologize if it seemed like I was trying to tear your team down, because I wasn’t. I’m just very curious with what’s going to happen over there in Minny-sota.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A few things:

1- It remains to be seen what type of system Witt will run.

2- Maybe “up and down” was the wrong choice of words for this club. I think they’ll have a quicker pace with more 3s and a lot of quick entries to the post.

3- I really think they are banking on Love’s outlet passing to get Brewer, Carney, McCants, and Foye out and running. At first I thought the damn thing was a gimmicky joke but after seeing it in action during the summer league, it’s an honest to god weapon that no other team in the league has. On damn near every possession he got it to a wing past 1/2 court or to the PG in full stride while 3/5 of the other team had their backs turned.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 4:45 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

His outlets impressed me as well

That really looks like a skill that will translate very well to the NBA. His passing was awesome. I watched most of his summer league games, and he really impressed me with that part of his game (and if you can’t tell, I’m sorta a Love-skeptic). The rest of what he did made me worry for the Wolves more, because he wasn’t physically superior to what most would describe to be extremely weak summer league big men.

His passing was AMAZING, so don’t get me wrong there. I just feel like the rest won’t translate to the NBA against good big men who also know how to rebound and where to position their body like Love naturally does. It’ll work well against so-so big men, even if those so-so big men can run laps around Love athletically, but I dunno about the big men you face in the playoffs someday…

Only time will tell of course, and I wish him and you guys the best of luck.

Like I said before, my worry is the nearly everyone in the starting lineup has to be compensated for in SERIOUS ways, which will inhibit everyone from playing their own game. Either too short, too slow, and no one to compensate for it.

I wish you guys had a serious athlete like a Gerald Wallace (just an example) to receive those outlets from Love, someone no one could stop and would just take it hard at the enemy defense once receiving Love’s touchdown pass. Or if you had drafted Thornton, or Julian Wright, or Thaddeus Young, an elite athlete to gallop downcourt… Brewer still has value of course, and he could definitely become up there with them. I hope he does.

This isn’t a race-based comparison, but I’ve seen a lot of people say Love’s outlet passes were Bill Walton-esque. Just two dudes who can pass well who happen to be white is all, so no one get upset I’m comparing him to a white guy…

You know, this might be idiotic, but let’s say Kevin Love becomes the great passing/rebounding PF you hope he can be—wouldn’t you be more willing to trade Al Jefferson for hopefully a fellow decent defensive big man and other parts, even though Jefferson’s fantasy numbers will always be much higher than Love?

Jefferson, to me, is a more athletic, dunking, Rich Man’s Zach Randolph. TERRIFIC scorer and rebounder, shoddy defender and passer. Forces shots. Luckily, Al Jefferson has a much, much better reputation than Randolph does, and has good to great league wide value.

Just theoritically, if Love becomes what you hope he will be, would you be more willing to move Al because he is more likely to get more in return?

SOMEONE has to be moved to fill in the massive holes.

Or, perhaps the draft will solve the problem. I know that’s how the Blazers did their rebuilding… now we hope they can get over the hump and make the playoffs this year.

I guess my main point is: who do you guys envision being the player to get traded? Even if they try as hard as they can defensively, Al and Love are just too small. I know it’s early, but the mismatched talent seems soooo evident that it’s not too early to plan for the eventual trade.

How attached is everyone here to Al Jefferson? Or Foye, for that matter?

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:34 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

boards

love will have no big problem rebounding, he’s got strength, plus will and good positioning, only a few will get away because of athleticism. he can also man up ok, but will not be great on help D.

by tkired on Jul 26, 2008 11:29 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mortimer is the man. Finally someone that knows what they’re talking about.

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:22 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, thanks Roundhouse...

...I’m just trying to learn a bit more about the Wolves from their hardcore fans, and I hope I’m not being too off-base with my point of view of the team from afar.

Rebuilding is a bitch, and my Blazers were the worst team in the league just a few years ago. It’s tough, but youth and the draft is the best way to go in my opinion—especially for a fellow small market city like Minnesota.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 25, 2008 6:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jefferson aint...

...going anywhere. They’ve gone all in with Jefferson and Love and there’s no walking it back at this point. The only way he moves is if Love blows up and Foye turns into an upper level point. Even then, he played the 5 last year and held his own for the most part…it was the rest of the team that sucked. Besides, 1/2 of the time, he’ll draw the other team’s center anyway (he’ll almost always get the big defender).

I’m not so much worried about defense as I am adjusted /- and Ortg/Drtg. The Wolves were horrible on both sides of the ball last year. They trotted out a lineup with Jefferson and Gomes at the 5/4. Love should make this squad a better defensive team from the get-to and there should be marginal improvement from Foye now that he has his legs fully back under him after the injury. If they can get their Drtg in the 108-109 range, they should be alright…especially if they can boost their Ortg with a young team into the same range. They’re building a team based on two main things: post play and wings who can either get up and down or hit the 3. I think that they have the potential to be an upper-level 112 Ortg kind of team. Foye, McCants, Miller, Love, and Jefferson gives them 3 guys who can shoot over 40% from 3 with a high/low post game. While they may have some issues on the defensive side of the court, I think once Love gets a year or two under his belt, they’ll cause a hell of a lot more problems on the offensive end than they’ll give up on the defensive end. Ultimately, it would be nice to see them upgrade McCants or Foye, but we’ll have to wait and see.

As for the Wallace comment: Carney is supposed to be a nice athlete. Brewer can get up and down the court and he has tremendous length. There’s no doubt about it: they blew a draft or two but they do have some athletes. Foye, McCants, Brewer, and Carney aren’t athletic chumps.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 25, 2008 7:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Point taken, I just think that at this point there are going to be some holes – they won’t be plugged all at once. I know you’re probably referring to the drafting of Love, but I think the FO rationale was this: we’re going to gamble that Mayo, while he might be a good player, isn’t going to be a superstar; and we’re going to take the best player available (Love) along with Miller; finally, we’re going to address the size problem – not immediately, but hopefully a few years down the road – by drafting Pekovic with the 1st pick of the 2nd round. From this perspective – and as long as Mayo doesn’t become Kobe Bryant – I think the draft makes sense, as I’m a big proponent of taking the best player available, regardless of the position (obviously Portland knows about this all too well…).

Maybe, as you say in your next post, this will mean trades have to be made down the line, but I think the FO probably thinks that this way – with a bunch of good players – they’ll be playing from a position of strength.

oh ps it’s cool in my book if you come over from another site, I think it’s good to get outside perspectives, often fans from other teams see things the home fans don’t.

by plinytheelder on Jul 25, 2008 7:13 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wittman doesn’t even know how to run an uptempo team

by roundhouse on Jul 25, 2008 6:17 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don’t forget we also drafted Pekovic. From what we know he really seems like the real deal and a true first round talent.

The thing about rebuilding is that you don’t have to do it overnight. There’s still plenty of time to add a defensive minded Center. Maybe Chandler in 2010, maybe Thabeet if he develops (we got lots of picks next year), maybe Pekovic, who knows.. We’ll got plenty more chances to see who fits there. There was no one in the current draft to fit there so good thing they don’t force the issue by trying to get (either) Lopez. Getting Love in this draft does create a bit of a weakness on defense (at least on first sight) but if you can get the best big man in the draft + a veteran shooter who wants to be here + get rid of bad contracts, you do it and worry about fitting later.

So anyway, I still think Love is a better defender than people think. He does work hard, tries not to give up position and all kinds of stuff like that .. off course, he’s not Mutombu, true.

Regulars here know I love to use rotation minutes to show what I mean. Already posted it before in this topic: http://www.canishoopus.com/2008/7/3/564420/getting-to-the-bottom-of-4#comments a must read if you want to know more about our opinion of the front court.
So say we get a guy who looks like an “anchor” as you say, here’s how my rotation would look like (I’m just gonna use Pekovic’s name here)

PF: Jefferson(18mins), Love (30mins)
C: Pekovic (28mins), Jefferson(20mins)

This way you’ll have 20 minutes a game that Jefferson and Love are together on the court. The other 28 minutes you have a combination of Love+Big defensive anchor or Jefferson+Big defensive anchor.

28 minutes for Pekovic or a player who’s sole purpose is defense, that looks okay to me. Love only gets 30 minutes, maybe a little low but since the front office sees Jefferson as a combo piece, I don’t see how else they think they’re gonna do it.

This off course leaves out Craig Smith and forces Gomes to fulltime SF with Miller already there, which would make Carney/Brewer/Mccants all fully spending time at SG. So we kinda got too many players but that’s been documentend in some other posts as well.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 26, 2008 2:21 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Again I forget to mention something: from what I read on Timberwolves.com (and hear/saw) the Wolves are going to run, you might call it a, “opportunistic” system. If the fast break is there, we’re gonna take it and make sure we finish it. Love will outlet and the other guys will know how to finish it. Jefferson will have some time to recuperate :D.

If it’s not, we’re bringing it up to half court.

I think the first book in McHale’s dictionary is (and has been, but now he seems to be doing it more the right way:) FLEXIBILITY

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 26, 2008 2:24 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That’s not an “opportunistic” system. It’s simply called the fastbreak and every other team in the league does it.

by roundhouse on Jul 26, 2008 8:45 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Haha

Yeah, every team tries for that. The better teams do it as often as possible… getting the easy buckets but also being able to play the halfcourt game is what championships are made of.

And strong defense is what creates those opportunities. You don’t get opportunistic/fastbreak buckets when the enemy made their basket.

This team won’t struggle to score, I’m sure. They just won’t stop the enemy from doing the same.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 4:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LoL

I didn’t mean opportunistic in a negative way. Anyway, just saying what I got from listening to McHale.

So to put it in other ways: he wants to get maximum amount of fastbreaks as possible…

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 10:37 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh and to make my triple post complete; I agree that you need strong defense (not just good outlet passing, quick runners/athletic finishers) to create sufficient fast break points.
If McHale wants a good pace with no run and gun, just a healthy mix of guys that can shoot + a double team machine for the half court sets and on the other hand some guys that can bring it up fast (Love+Telfair, he’s quick, don’t forget that) and some guys that can finish (that’s why I hate seeing Brewer miss so many layups in the Summer League) than I’m all in for that .. He just needs to remember there’s 2 sides to the game. I’m sure he hasn’t forgotten though ^^.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 10:48 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

did you drive yourself crazy looking for this one?

by plinytheelder on Jul 31, 2008 2:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think that's just about right with the minutes

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 26, 2008 8:51 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm getting ya

So, Love isn’t a starter then? He comes off the bench?

That means the 3rd pick in a very strong draft was used on a 6th man?

And do you know Pekovic is starter quality? I honestly don’t know, as I haven’t heard much about him, and I ain’t totally clueless about the Euros… who does he play for?

I totally agree you need a defensive center to go around… who? Jefferson or Love? If you keep both, then one isn’t starting, which seems like bad value for where you were picking or a misuse of talent in Jefferson. That’s why I think one has to be traded some-year soon; each are starter quality bigs for someone in the NBA, but do not go well together.

I want you guys to have that anchor next to either Jefferson or Love, which is why I wonder how in the meantime Jefferson and Love are gonna fit—and since I can’t see how it could POSSIBLY work on defense against quality bigs, that duo has to be broken up in favor of a defensive post player someday soon, or forever be sorta bad.

And you’re definitely right—the draft will be a great way to fix the problem. Just seems like you gave yourself a problem by getting a guy who doesn’t fit, but if he is BPA then I definitely can’t argue. BPA will never get you in trouble like drafting for need will.

I just wondered if most Wolves fans felt like either Love or Jefferson would eventually soon be moved, because it seemed like most felt they were the core and would play together as the Wolves become great again. We haven’t seen Love in the NBA yet of course, but even best case scenario they aren’t a good match as (like we’ve agreed on) they need a defensive player aside them to compensate for their defensive weaknesses and undersized bodies.

Jefferson doesn’t seem to try on defense, but any problems Love has on defense won’t be for a lack of trying. It’s out of his control; he’s 6’8” and not very quick. As a PF, he’s gonna have a hell of a time matching up with Aldridge, West, AMARE, Duncan, KG, etc. It’s a very athletic position these days, and often guys who would play SF before (like Travis Outlaw, Josh Smith, Shawn Marion) play most of their minutes as a PF to take advantage of mismatches. Love will simply not be able to keep up with those guys, and it won’t be his fault—he’ll try as hard as he can, I’m sure.

Since you got Telfair, Foye, McCants, etc, I do not think the trade of Mayo for Love and Miller was a bad trade at all—even if Mayo turns into a star. You got the guy your front office seemed to want, plus a terrific and BIG shooter in Mike Miller. I just seriously question how Love fits on a team where Al Jefferson is the best player, since they have many of the same weaknesses, so basically I do agree it’s a problem to fix later—but it has to be fixed, and that means one will likely be traded.

Since Jefferson will put up bigger numbers, I vote it will be Jefferson who has more value and will get traded (provided Love is good of course). Making Love the 6th man doesn’t seem like a good use of his value, but I could be wrong.

I’m sure things will get fixed over time. The next lottery pick could be the one that puts you guys over the top and back on the playoff train in no time. I like what you guys got going on, but like I said (probably too many times) I’m just curious about how it’ll fit from a T-Wolves fan’s perspective.

Like the post you directed me to showed, Al Jefferson did do well as a center, but you’d HAVE to think with his size and athleticism he’d do even better as a PF. He can definitely get by as a center, though…

Love and Al will someday soon be good enough to get to the playoffs, but it’s too small and weak defensively to win a championship. I know you guys want a title, not just playoffs. That’s the context of my questions and comments, just for clarification.

Why doesn’t the season just start so we can just SEE how it works? It’d make things a lot easier.

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it! Educate me!

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 4:10 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's sad

that the Blazers young players/front office/owner are all so good that they’re wishing us the best of luck with our team…

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 6:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It ain't THAT sad

The Blazers made the playoffs 20+ years in a row, last time in 2003. Traditionally the Blazers have been pretty good. They aren’t the CLIPPERS or sumthin’!

You guys are doing what Portland did, which in my opinion is the best way to go: draft the best players you can, get rid of the dead weight contracts to whomever will take them, accrue draft picks in the 2nd round (or 1st round if you can, of course), and play the young kids while setting yourself up for caproom in a few years.

That’s how the Blazers got Roy, LMA, Rudy Fernandez, Frye, Jerryd Bayless, etc. They got lucky with Oden, but the rest was just following the plan. Now Martell and Outlaw are paying off as well, which took some time (especially in Outlaw’s case—he’s still pretty raw, and he’s entering his 6th season!).

This next summer the Blazers are also looking at around 20 million in cap space to add someone else to the Roy/Oden/LMA/Rudy/Bayless/Martell/Outlaw core.

Do you guys got cap space coming up? Adding some key free agents who want to win once Love, Foye, Brewer, Jefferson gel could speed up the process obviously.

Besides the losers who preceded Kevin Pritchard as GM and Team President, the Blazers have usually had good front office people, and were either a good or near-championship level team. So, unless I’m misinterpreting you, it isn’t THAT sad to be wished good luck by a Blazer fan!

I do apologize if I came across as condescending, of course. The Wolves will do just fine, in time.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 7:03 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who's Pekovic?

He dominated the Serbian league the last 3 years, won last 2 Adriatic league titles with Partizan, this year is moving to Panathinaikos (winner of 10 of last 11 Greek championships and the Euroleague 2 years ago), some scouts say he’d start for all but 3 NBA teams (Phx Orlando Houston).

by plinytheelder on Jul 27, 2008 1:16 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh forgot to mention...

...I very much like Wim’s minutes scenarios. People were talking about Ginóbili as a possible mvp candidate last year before he got hurt, and he comes of the bench.

by plinytheelder on Jul 27, 2008 1:24 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Forget to mention it here (thing I did somewhere else though). Jefferson always starts, between Love and Pekovic, it depends on other teams’ starters and probably first people of the bench.

Like if their best player is an offensive powerhouse, use Pekovic. If the guy seems to be cold or he’s been playing for a while, sub in Love.

There are a multitude of scenario’s so I’m not gonna go over all of them, you get the picture.

I’m no coach but I think what any coach wants is to have as many tools as possible in his toolbox. This is why I think San Antonio is so succesfull and I’ve had the feeling that I’ve recognized some things before about what Mchale is trying to put together. I’m not sure but I think he might be thinking he wants to build a Spurs-type team. If you look at the Euro Bigs, Finley/Manu, .... whoever is subbed in or out the team never seems to be much weaker and they can change pace so quickly. Use Parker and Ginobili. You want more outside shooting (though Manu has a nice 3pt too), use Udrih (yea he’s gone now) and Finley … you can play any way you want.

Anyway, Love wouldn’t be a starter, he would still get starter minutes, that’s what (should) matters. Look at Manu (again). I know he’s a pretty isolated case but still. That team is so balanced, whenever the other team starts to go to it’s, mostly lesser defending, bench Manu is put in and he can so single handled force the opposing team’s coach to go back to his starters or at least some of them. Whenever you can mess with the opposing teams’ game plan. that’s good.

Love could be similar. You start out with Telfair as the guy who organises the offense, dumps it to big Al. Then when the other team will start to go to their bench you can put in Love, sub out Telfair and use Randy at the point. You can organise your offense through the High post with Love their and use Foye more as a combo (since that’s what he is, that sounds good, right?).

On the defensive end; if you can somehow match the 20 minutes of bad defense (Love + Jefferson together on the field) with the 10-18 minutes of resting time of the other team’s best offensive player.

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end so that would force them to get down on the minutes of the opposing team’s best offensive player and still have the upper hand (because when the other team’s best player is on the floor, it’s not really a problem that our defense isn’t that bad).

WOAH, anyone still following? I know this is AWFULLY theoritical and hypothetical BUT you the point remains, if you’ve got players that can do a multitude of things and you have different types of play you can use AND you’ve got a coach who knows how to use them then I’m sure you have a good chance of winning games .. ESPECIALLY in the playoffs, that’s where the strategy things comes to it’s peak.

On Love being a 6th man and it being low value of a 5th pick I’ve only got this: if a 5th pick is the 6th man and helps his team win a championship, that’s plenty of value to me. As long as his contribution is big enough (read: minutes are important, not starting/bench).

At first I wasn’t all to happy with Love because I also tought he duplicated so much of Jefferson and he was also undersized (McHale said he things the league is getting smaller so that Love isn’t undersized, we all know, to say it in a cool way “he’ trippin’”).

BUT, the more you look at it, the more you realize a team is too complicated to just say that there’s no way that two players that aren’t perfectly compatible couldn’t be together on a succesfull team.

Off course, once the season starts I could look like a total idiot when we get dunked on 33 times a night, after all, what do I know (still nice to pretend though :D)

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:23 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ok that part was hard I'll try it again

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end so that would force them to get down on the minutes of the opposing team’s best offensive player and still have the upper hand (because when the other team’s best player is on the floor, it’s not really a problem that our defense isn’t that bad).

This again

OR if you could like put some of those minutes while their best defensive center goes to the bench, you could force them to shorten his rest because they’re so tearing them up on the offensive end.

If the other team’s coach has to bring back their best defender this could mean that the other team’s offensive player will get less minutes because he has to go out.

Since Jefferson is a guy that can get his shot of against anyone, he would still be good defensively (not as good as without the other team’s best defender but still pretty good) + we would have not that much trouble at the defensive end because the other team’s best offensive guy has been subbed out… = We force them to do stuff = always good.

Hope that’s any more clear

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:30 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Damn I'm embarrased, that's 5 points in a row

Also would like to add, Jefferson is seen by a Combo guy by the FO. He is really a guy that has his uses at both position. If you’re gonna use combo guys you’ll always have weird things with starting <> bench positions, always, because that’s what combo guys do, they try to change the makeup of a team so if they’re switching according to whats happening in the game you’re always gonna have players that play less or more minutes according to mathups.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 27, 2008 11:32 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No I'm not offended or anything...

just thinking that the Blazers will probably stomp all over us as they win the division for the next 10 years.

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 8:30 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't see it...

...I’ll have a post on it a bit later, but I don’t see the Blazers being an upper level team. I think injuries and too many shooters will eventually do them in. There’s more to it but I think they’ll top out at the same level as the Wolves: right below the top 2 teams in the WC.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 10:09 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Greg Oden?

LMA? Roy?

Rudy?

Outlaw? Bayless?

Too many shooters? You can’t have too many around LMA and Oden. Roy, Bayless, Rudy are all SLASHERS who can shoot. That’s the perfect combo.

If Oden is Oden, Portland is a top level team. No way around it. They are too good at a very young age, with a very rich owner to pay everyone, to not become a top team. 3rd youngest team of all time won 41 games, no Oden, no Rudy. It’s just gonna get better. I could see your point if we didn’t have Oden—but we do. He’s very good. He’s going to be a tippity top center.

He’s also in very good health right now.

If you’re expecting injuries to do us in, well, that’s not something to hang your hat on. That’s why McHale didn’t draft Roy after all, and trying to predict who is going to be injury prone and basing decisions off of that is foolhardy at best. The less-injury prone Foye has spent most of his time hurt—not his fault, but kinda ironic considering why they took him over Roy.

If you want the Wolves to be good (and I swear this is coming from the least homery-side of me I can muster up), you must have a team that can deal with the Lakers and Portland. Otherwise, they’re just a playoff team who either gets destroyed by Bynum/Gasol/Kobe or Oden/LMA/Roy.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 5:13 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get...

...that you like the team, but Oden and Roy have played exactly 0 injury free seasons. Bayless had a SL performance right up there with Randy Foye. I’ll believe it when I see it.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 5:53 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow S-n-P...

you’re crazy if you don’t think the Blazers can be a top 2 team and also if you think the wolves are going to be anywhere near that level.

by roundhouse on Jul 27, 2008 6:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Come on now...

...they’ve won 41 games and they have a core that I’d trade in a second for, but it’s not crazy to think that they can’t get by NOLA, the Lakers, and Utah (if they keep it together) in the next 5 years. I think both the Blazers and the Wolves will be around 55 win teams in 3 years. That’s a pretty damn good record but it is in no way, shape, or form crazy to think that they may not win it all or get to the finals. Nobody has seen Oden play in the NBA. They’ll eventually have to start paying these guys and I don’t care how rich Allen is, the NBA has a restrictive CBA in terms of locking up a bunch of high end talent. You can get 3, maybe 4 top end guys and that’s it. Let’s say that Oden works out; he’s a max type guy, right? What about Roy? LMA is going to get 10-12 at some point in his career. My point is that I don’t think Roy and Oden will ever be more than Paul and Chandler or, to borrow from another pair that hasn’t been tested yet: Kobe and Bynum.

How is that crazy?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 6:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Plus...

...the next time I read the words “Pritch Slapped” I’m forgetting all of my previous nice thoughts towards that franchise.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 6:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can pay a whole team max money

We’ll just have to continue the conversation about how good Portland will be in a year, after they had a good season. I think you’re selling the team a bit short.

There is a salary cap and a luxury tax. Paul Allen, before, has paid 50+ million in the luxury tax for a mediocre team. He is the richest owner in sports. There is nothing in the CBA about restricting what you can pay a player aside from the max.

So if Roy/LMA/Oden/Rudy/Martell/Outlaw/Bayless/etc become very good players, he can pay them whatever their fair market value is or more.

If Bayless is as good as Foye, I’m happy! He used his sheer quickness and athleticism to score 29 ppg in the summer. That won’t happen in the real NBA. But, he’s a good compliment to Roy, who is the real PG. Foye would be nice next to Roy as well, but Bayless projects to be a better defender against PGs because of his good size and extreme quickness. I like Foye though, so I take that comparison well.

Let’s say Oden only has the offensive skills of Chandler (which he doesn’t, Oden is much much much more skilled—AND a lot more athletic and big) and Roy is “only” Paul. Don’t forget about LMA, Rudy, Outlaw, Martell, Bayless, and who knows if Frye and Diogu or Sergio can become good as well. Hell, Batum is a great defender already!

I’m sorry man, I’m being as fair as I can be: you’re going to have to match up with Portland to get anywhere in the west, along with the Lakers… however, the Blazers are all in their teens or early 20s, where Kobe has 3, 4 more good years. The Blazers have 10 to 12.

The Blazers already won most of their games against NOLA, LA, and Utah. We match up with them very well.

No one in recent history have had such a collection of talent, the attitudes that want to be in a small market (Portland), and a owner who won’t blink an eye at paying them. There’s a reason the youngest and 2nd youngest teams ever won a combined 31 games, and the Blazers won 41 in a historically tough western conference.

Unless you think Oden is a bust (and true, we gotta just let him play and see) or Roy and LMA won’t improve (or Bayless or Rudy or blah blah), then only time and experience is holding the team back.

The Wolves have to get the roster to face that team, and I’m not trying to be an unrealistic homer about it. Oden is very, very good. He’s huge n’ buff yet still has low body fat and is quick, and has worked on his offense all year. He’s got the hook, the bank shot, the 18 footer, plus has retained his power.

I shouldn’t promise things for him, and I know we gotta just let him play, but my zealous fan side gets the best of me sometimes.

That’s part of where my worries about the Wolves frontline stems from. You’ll definitely, DEFINITELY make the playoffs with your current squad.

I think we can both agree we just want the damn season to start. Arguing over how good a team WILL be is silly I know, but no one is better situated with GREAT young talent and cap room. Not just good talent, GREAT talent.

I promise I will never say Pritch Slapped around here. I want you guys to match up well with us, so the small markets can take over the league.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 9:04 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"I think you’re selling the team a bit short."

A 55 win squad in the Western Conference is selling someone short?

I think the main problem that teams like the Wolves and Blazers will have is that their top end talent will never be up to par with the top end talent on NOLA, the Lakers, and the Jazz. Yes, the Celts won with the Big Three but as someone who watched KG over the span of 12 years, I think it’s easy for folks to forget just how high end of a talent he is. KG and Pierce trumps a lot of other combos.

As for the payment stuff, the CBA, mainly by way of restricted free agency, has created a situation where it’s very hard to pay more than 3 studs. Let’s say that Roy restructures around 12 mil going forward. I’d guess that the rest of the core would be LMA (another 10-12 mil), and Oden (rookie rates for at least another 2 years), with guys like Bayless and Outlaw getting by on rookie slotted salaries and MLEs. There is a lot of talent there and it’s all developing at the same time. I guess I just can’t remember a team being brought along like that developing all at once. It’s one of the big things that worries me about the Wolves; there’s simply too many young guys and by the time they develop, they may have just primed them for another team to come in and pay some of the players more than what they can be offered by the home team. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see how some of these salaries play out.

I think the best shot the Blazers have at really getting over the NOLA/LAL/Jazz hump is for LMA to improve. It will also be interesting to see how Fernandez adjusts to the NBA.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 9:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think you're mistaken with one detail

Every player you draft, you own the Bird rights to. You don’t use MLEs on players you draft. You use the Bird rights you own.

If you are willing to pay the luxury tax, you can pay your players whatever they are worth. I’d say RFA makes it much, much more easier to keep your good young players. You can match what anyone else wants to pay them, and be allowed to go over the cap to pay them what you want otherwise.

We handled those teams very well without Oden. Oden is the premier talent you’re talking about. There’s a reason everyone has known who Greg Oden was since he was 12.

We need everyone to improve as well, but they all work hard. You take a smart kid who works hard and is already athletically gifted, they’re gonna improve.

No one can pay one of your young guys more than you can because of restricted free agency. It is a godsend for us small market teams.

I would be extremely disappointed if my team topped out at 55 wins. This is gonna be a better team than the Sheed years, the Clyde years. It’s gonna be suh-weet!

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 27, 2008 9:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get that Allen is rich...

...and that he’ll spend luxury dollars, but there has to be a tipping point somewhere if some of these guys develop and get $10 mil offers. I don’t think you can keep them all. Also, I’m talking about MLEs to fill out the roster a’la San Antonio, which I assume Prichard will eventually do.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 27, 2008 9:38 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

S/P, I'll be interested

to read your eventual post on Portland, I for one think they’ll be very good, I think they have two very special players in Roy and Oden. I don’t know enough about Aldridge, and I don’t think Bayless will be as good as people seem to think. But Roy is great. Obviously we’ll have to see with Oden, but I saw him a few times at Ohio State, including the national championship game, when he was, in my opinion, the best player on the court. In fact not only the best player, but literally playing at another level compared to Horford, Brewer, Noah and Conley. (I remember thinking before that game: OSU needs spectacular performances from both Conley and Oden to win. Oden was spectacular, Conley merely very good.) Barring injury I think Oden has a chance to be great. I think that between Oden and Roy they have potentially the best 2-man combo in the league – well in a few years that is – better than Kobe/whoever, Williams/Boozer, West/Paul. Oh and by the way why has no one made any good Sam Bowie jokes?

by plinytheelder on Jul 28, 2008 12:14 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This would be why

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Timberwolves_draft_history

Blazer’s have made some bad moves too, but their record isn’t exactly impressive.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 4:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some bad moves?

Hey come on, I like the Blazers and all, root for them as a fellow small-market team; by my count, 9 of the 10 sentences in my post are about how good/great they’re going to be. But we’re talking about the single worst draft pick in history – surely we can make a joke or 2 about that once in a while?...

by plinytheelder on Jul 28, 2008 6:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

haha

no we have about 5 or 6 terrible draft picks. Plus there’s that whole cutting Moses Malone thing.

And I’m not sure he was the absolute worst, probably just the most infamous. Heck, Bowie wasn’t so bad before he broke his leg and all

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 10:20 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If the Blazers lose one of those guys

It won’t be for money reasons.

If, say, Bayless or Rudy are WORTH 10 million, and they want to play in Portland and be a co-star with Roy/LMA/Oden, then they’ll be paid what they’re worth, no problem.

If they are good enough to do the Joe Johnson thing and leave to take over a whole franchise, and want to leave so they can be THE MAN somewhere, then that’s the only way we wouldn’t keep them.

Also, obviously, if they turn out to have a bad attitude or are an obviously bad fit; in those cases they’ll be traded, not lost to free agency.

Payment will be no problem. Nothing in the CBA or salary cap prevents paying your players what they are worth, and Paul Allen has always gone deep into the luxury tax in his quest for a championship.

I’m sure Roy/LMA/Oden will be worth the big bucks. We hope Martell, Trout, Rudy, and Bayless become worth the big bucks as well; we can only be so lucky. As long as they want to stay in Portland and win, they’ll get paid.

It’s kinda unfair since Paul Allen is so much richer than any other owner in sports, but for some reason it doesn’t bother me as much.

I agree with you though; we got the Big 3 of our core, once we figure out which of the co-stars are the right players for us, the rest of the roster will be filled with economical MLE role players who just want to win and help out the stars of the team.

No matter what, the Blazers are headed back to luxury tax land after this next summer’s cap space spending spree. As long as the players we pay big money too are the RIGHT players (and at least with the Big 3, I think they are), I don’t care how much they get paid and I doubt Paul Allen does either. Just lock ‘em up.

Once the Blazers’ payroll is back over 100 million and they’re winning a bunch, I’m fully prepared for everyone to hate the team and its vocal fans. I apologize in advance, and hope to become friends now so you’ll hate me less later!

Mortimer!

by Mortimer on Jul 29, 2008 3:14 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m also on the Portland band wagon BUT SnP had some controversial (at least in my view) points before and he’s been able to underbuild those opinions with strong arguments so I’ll be reading that post :).

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 28, 2008 4:30 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

high five

If Portland stays in the Northwest division, maybe you will be our new divisional rivals.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 5:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hopefully...

Portland goes to a far away division. I’m definitely in the camp that believes the best the wolves will ever do in the near future is 3rd in our division behind Portland and Utah. One of those 2 teams will always win the division, Denver is still better than us right now, and Seattle IMO has a better core of young players than us.

by roundhouse on Jul 28, 2008 8:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think....

...people overlook Denver this year and that they will still make the playoffs. They still have a nice young core and they brought in 2 nice bench players. I completely disagree about OKC having a better core. I think Durrant is Keith Van Horn part ii and Green is a putrid player. I’d much rather have Jefferson, Love, and McCants/Foye than Durrant, Green, and Westbrook. Green had a Brewer-esque bad year as a rookie and then some. At least Brewer looks like he may be able to guard someone at some point in his career. He also appears to have some sort of value above and beyond his poor scoring. Durrant and Green both appear to be scorers who can’t score efficiently. That being said, I may have to warm up to them as I have lots of family in Oklahoma and we may move back there at some point…they may become my 2nd favorite team.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 28, 2008 9:05 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol

Kevin Durant is Keith Van Horn? Wow. How did you come up with that? He averaged 20ppg as a skinny 19 year old rookie! I don’t care if he wasn’t that efficient, that level of production at that age is very rare. He’s athletic, he’s quick, he can handle the ball, he can shoot 3s, has a mid range game, and once he gets stronger he’ll post up on guards and average some good rebounding numbers. With his length and speed he can develop into a superb defender as well. He might just end up being the most versatile player in the NBA. How many players can be as effective as a 2,3, and 4? He had a solid rookie year on a poor team. If anything his first year showed as the signs of a perennial all star in the making. If you even watched him play near the end of the year you would have noticed how much more efficient he was becoming on the offensive end. With his work ethic and intensity he has the potential to be a Lebron-caliber player.

I don’t like Jeff Green too much but he’s better than Brewer. He actually has a body that can compete in the NBA. Secondly, he’s a far superior offensive player than Brewer, who flat out sucked on the offensive side of the ball last year. Not saying that he’s above average or anything but he’s not horrible for a rookie. It’s way too soon to be making such heavy handed judgments about a player entering his second year. Right now, it looks like the Sonics should have gone for Thad Young or Stuckey but who knows. Saying that Jeff Green is never going to be a good defender shows that you probably haven’t seen the guy play, he’s a pretty good defender. He was drafted on being a good defender, much like Brewer.

Westbrook seems to be a project imo, so we’ll have to wait and see how well he can play in 2 or even 3 years. He has a lot of potential with his great length, quickness, and athleticism. In college he showed that he could be a great defender so he already has that going for him. He could either become the next Antonio Daniels or Devin Harris, depending on his point guard development and work on his jump shot.

McCants looks like a classic case, of a player who looks good on a bad team. I mean he didn’t even look great, just seemed like a chucker.

And even if the Love/Jefferson combo works on offensive, I’m not convinced at all it will work on offense. They are just too short, and slow.

Durant will be the primary scorer and Green and Westbrook will be the defensive glue guys. Say Green turns out to be a player like Tayshaun Prince and Westbrook is Devin Harris that’s a decent team. Especially if KD turns out as good as he projects to be. That seems like a sensible and logical lineup. Will it be better than Minny’s lineup as of now? Hard to say, but I would think probably. Durant might be a superstar, a one of a kind player. Minny doesn’t have anyone with that sort of potential. It depends on how well Presti drafts next year and how his picks develop but Durant alone could skew the balance completely.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 11:23 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And there's no way the Nuggets are making the playoffs

They traded their best defensive player for salary room, and let Najera go for the same reason. Balkman is a decent defender who isn’t going to minutes over Carmelo.

They still don’t have a point guard, they don’t have a center and they are going to let Jr Smith walk in free agency for salary. The Nuggets have zero team chemistry and no leadership on that team. I think 40 games is their potential this year.

Unless the entire team turns around and actually starts to play defense they will fall on their face next year.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 11:46 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I also wouldn't be surprised

If they deal AI midway through the season.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 28, 2008 11:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is there something in the water in Portland...

...that makes people write 2,000 words instead of the 20 that are necessary?

by plinytheelder on Jul 29, 2008 1:59 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

LoL

Though I would say he makes some points.

I’m not so sure about OKC. I agree that you can’t judge a rookie, especially since he had to be top dog in that first year.
There’s a good chance in a year or 5 it’s going to be the best division in the NBA.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 29, 2008 2:25 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

Presti seems like he’s great with trades (using Kurt Thomas to get like 4 first round picks) but I’m still iffy about his draft picks. Bayless is a better player right now. I think most places had him going at #4 for the longest time. Mayo or maybe even Beasley seemed within their grasp, so Westbrook was a bit of a weird choice.

I also said I didn’t like Green at #5 in 2007 either. Never got that one.

I get that they think that Durant is their super star, but the draft is still a crap shoot sometimes. Why not go for the higher potential all star caliber players at such high picks? Westbrook and Green seem like good role players to me.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 3:23 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rajon’s D + Monta’s O = Westbrook

Gilbert minus the Agent Zero = Bayless

I’ll take Westbrook.

by roundhouse on Jul 29, 2008 4:18 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Westbrook is no where near Monta Ellis' Offense

Dude doesn’t have a proper jump shot yet.

From DXpress
Weaknesses:
• Not a true point guard
• Undersized for SG position
• Struggles in half-court
• Average ball-handler
• Average shooter
• Ability to create own shot
• Mid-range game
• A starter at PG or SG?
• Needs time to develop

Comparisons:
Best Case: Leandro Barbosa
Worst Case: Shannon Brown

Bayless for comparison
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jerryd-Bayless-1067/

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 2:26 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ok...

I wasn’t listing what they are right now, but what they could be. You really think Bayless is a lesser Arenas right now? LOL

Also very nice to only give Westbrook’s weaknesses but then link to Bayless’ full profile. That’s pretty subjective don’t you think?

by roundhouse on Jul 29, 2008 9:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Huh?

How is it subjective? Obviously it’s not too much of a hassle to go look at WB page at Draft express. WB is not very developed offensively. Bayless is much farther along. Westbrook got pumped up because of the tournament and workouts, before that he was looking at being drafted 10-13th. Westbrook didn’t even play point guard for most of the year (like Bayless), averaged less points per game (i think around 12 or 13), and is pretty raw offensively. Bayless is just as athletic and quick but is stronger and is a much better shooter.

And yeah Bayless is a lesser Arenas right now. He’s a short shooting guard who plays point guard because of his size. That’s what Arenas is.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 10:18 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Helps spark discussion!

Plus I haven’t lived in the Portland area for almost 4 years now.

No other thread has this many replies in the side bar.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 3:18 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Where you be livin' at, Dheepan?

Something isn’t worth following if the general thoughts on the topic can be expressed in one sentence.

The NBA, the Blazers, the Timberwolves, deserve more than 1 sentence discussions. The more discussion, the more words, the more thought that goes into making the words, the better.

Are you away from Portland on a schooling mission? Educating yourself somehow? Did your family steal you away from the best city in the world?

I think Jeff Green will be good. He had some pretty good games his rookie year, and will be a good to really good all-round player. He’s unselfish, good defender for a young guy, great body, athletic, can do it all.

He’s just young, like Durant.

Durant had a worse season than I was expecting, but being on a team that tells him to shoot whenever he wants and not play the right way isn’t the best way to bring along such an offensively talented young player.

Saying he is the next Keith Van Horn is insane and makes me wonder. At LEAST say the next Glenn Robinson or sumthin’, right? Durant had some very good games and is simply too skinny and too young, yet still was a great player some nights.

If Durant is Keith Van Horn, then Corey Brewer should be in the WNBA. Young players, especially out of high school or 1 year in college, should not be judged by their 1st year in the NBA. Or their 2nd. Or even their 3rd. Tall people’s bodies can sometimes take longer to fill out and some people take longer to adjust to the NBA than others.

To state as if it was a FACT that so n’ so is “BLANK” after 1 or 2 seasons is flat out silly.

I look forward to the Portland rundown S n’ P is gonna do, but all of his predictions will be based off of 1 year of play by the core, or NO years of play. I don’t expect many assumptions that won’t be premature (and if “injuries” is one of the reasons Portland won’t be very good, I guess he’s using the same crystal ball that McHale used to predict Foye would be healthier than Roy).

So take that, Dheepan. That’ll show you for not living in Portland for the last 4 years.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 29, 2008 6:58 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I live close to DC, in Northern Virginia

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 10:19 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Durrant is a tall chucker...

...just like Van Horn. Congratulations, you’re 6’10” and can shoot.

I know it’s nice to project what players like Durrant, Westbrook, and Green could be, but the fact is that they aren’t, haven’t, and have shown zero signs of being able to yet. Green is simply terrible:

http://www.82games.com/0708/07SEA14D.HTM
http://www.knickerblogger.net/stats/2008/SuperSonics.htm
http://basketballvalue.com/player.php?year=2007-2008&id=715

Green carried a net 4 pts on his +/ compared to his own crappy team. I wouldn’t even go so far as to say that he’s better than Brewer. At least Brewer was able to contribute to his team in other ways than was Green and keep his +/- numbers a bit more effective.

Getting back to Durrant, there are two ways to score: efficiently or by way of taking a ton of shots. Durrant simply took a ton of shots. He had the 12th highest usage rate in the entire frickin’ league. He did so with the 94th best PER, 47th best free throw rate, 132nd best rebound rate, and 178th best PPR. In other words, outside of the fact that he took a ridiculous number of shots, he was either very average or downright crappy considering the amount of time he had his mitts on the ball.

He’s a one of a kind player all right. No other coach in his right mind would let something like that happen on their team. I’d bet dollars to donuts that Shaddy would put up a better year than Durrant if he were given permission to go hog wild like Durrant was.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 7:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

for some reason...

...that post didn’t format correctly….green had a negative 4 on his +/-.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 7:58 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and...

...it should read “at a bit more effective level.”

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 7:59 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also...

...while we’re at it, here are some numbers from KVH and KD’s rookie seasons:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/v/vanhoke01.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/d/duranke01.html

KD:

FGA/game: 17.1
FG%: 43
eFG: 45
PER: 15.8
Usg: 28.1
ORtg: 100
Drtg: 110

KVH:

FGA: 16.9
FG: 42.6
eFG: 45.9
PER: 15.7
Usg: 25.2
Ortg: 106
Drtg: 108

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 8:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Damn you always find some numbers to back up what you said.
I’m holding on to we’ll see mode but you already got bragging rights if his effectiveness doesn’t improve.

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 29, 2008 10:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It will all depend...

...on whether or not OKC’s coaches continue to allow Durrant to chuck it like he did last year. KVH had some pretty ridiculous usage rates for his 1st 3 years. Once he dipped below 25% he became more of an asset to his team (New Jersey) and his efficiency rates ended up in the positive and his team did a whole lot better. Part of this has to do with swapping out Starbury for Kidd, but Van Horn had to ease up on the trigger a bit in order to become a decent player.

KD shoots a lot and is an inefficient scorer. He’s not even that good of an offensive player in a team setting as his 100 Ortg can attest to. Yet, he has a massive top-15 usage rate. Here’s hoping Westbrook pans out at the point because KD isn’t going to be the player a lot of people thought he would be if he keeps chucking like he did last year.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 11:18 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you thought Green was bad, we might as well just cut Brewer right now.

by roundhouse on Jul 29, 2008 9:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But Brewer...

...at least showed signs of being able to be of value off the ball. He carried an adj +/- of 0.41 with a much more positive ratio compared to his team’s play than Green. Green racked up a 6.56 individual adj +/ while being 4.07 below his team’s number (compared to negative 1.72 for Brewer). Brewer needs help on the offensive end. There is no doubt about it. But Seattle played just as well with or without Green on the offensive end while being 3.8 pts worse per 100 possessions on the defensive end with him on the court. The Wolves were 1.9 pts/100 better on defense when Brewer was out there.

Brewer showed signs of being an effective team playerr last year. Green showed signs of being an ineffective scorer.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 11:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i guess...

....the minus sign doesn’t work in these posts. green had a negative 6.56 adj plus/minus

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 29, 2008 11:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

haha

Ok so what? They are both crappy teams, Green played more, Brewer played less.

Stats like these are significantly skewed by blowouts. If Brewer played in more blowouts it would seem like the team did better on the court because they went from being down 20 to being down 14. Great. The fact remains he started only 34 games compared to Green’s 52. This would definitely point to the idea that Brewer played more in garbage time.

82 games supports this notion as well.
Seattle’s best unit statistically is Watson-Durant-Green-Collison-Petro. This lineup resulted in a win 56.5% of the time. This unit was on the court 204 minutes.

Minnesota’s best unit did not include Brewer. He was on the 3rd best lineup. Foye-Jaric-Brewer-Gomes-Jefferson played 111 minutes together and only won 26.6% of the time.

Now put that together with the physical and basketball differences of the two players and Green is far superior at this point. Just look at the weight difference. Green outweighs Brewer by nearly 40 pounds! Against bigger and stronger NBA competition Green is by far the better defender just because of this difference. He’s far more NBA ready than Brewer is just by that metric. And as I mentioned before Brewer is dismal on offense. Heck, Brewer looked out of place against Summer League competition.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 11:33 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nothing you wrote here...

...has anything to do with anything. Green is heavier and he played with 4 guys who played well? You need to look at stats per 100 possessions if you’re going to use plus/minus stats. 82 games does not support this notion. You can take any single 5 man unit and point to it as success or failure of a given player who happens to be included in the lineup. However, if you take his entire body of work and then spread it out as an average over 100 possessions, Green is significantly less effective on the court

The unit you cite for the Sonics actually had a negative efficiency rating:

http://basketballvalue.com/teamunits.php?year=2007-2008&team=SEA

It’s the top one on the list. That unit gave up over 9 points per 100 possessions. There’s no way in hell they win 56.5% of the time. That’s the problem with raw plus/minus data with 5 man units. You have to average it (a’la baseball batting average) over a certain number of possessions.

Green’s stats are here:

http://basketballvalue.com/player.php?year=2007-2008&id=715

All in all, he gave up over 10 points per 100 possessions. His on/off numbers also tell us that Seattle was just as good on the offensive end with him on the court as it is with him off. Sooooo…it follows that he’s losing his points at the other end of the court.

Brewer’s stats are here:

http://basketballvalue.com/player.php?year=2007-2008&id=712

He gives up just over 8 points per 100 possessions. While carrying a closer ratio to his team’s numbers than Green. If you want simple plus/minus stats, Brewer actually had a 0.41 while Green was negative 6.56.

I can see that one player is bigger than the other. Anybody can see that. But that size has nothing to do with the fact that Brewer was able to do things on the court that made him a more effective player in a team setting than Green. Despite him having some pretty severe offensive issues, he still had a better ORtg than Green: 101.71 to 100.34. Green is awful.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 8:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Too small to fit over there, but a reply to S&P

How are you going to justify such disparate comparison with 1 year of data and completely different players. Sure statistically it looks like they are similar but..

KVH as rookie, 22
KD, as a rook, 19

KVH played as an SF
KD played as an SG last year

KD’s athleticism, length (7’4” wingspan), ball handling skill, > KVH

Then you take into consideration Durant’s insane drive to be the best at basketball, they are really completely different players. Stats may show that they were similar (in their first year) but there is a planetary magnitude in difference in their physical abilities. Durant’s potential is hall of famer, Van Horn had no where near that amount of potential. They are completely different players.

When you consider all of that, a line of 19.5 points, 4.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists nightly seems pretty surreal. Those are incredible numbers for a teenager to post at the highest level of competition in the world. For comparison’s sake, and please bare with me because I’m not suggesting Durant is going to be on par with him, but LeBron James posted a rookie line of 20.9 ppg, 5.5 rpg and 5.9 apg, while shooting 41.7% overall and just 29% from downtown.

Yes, James’ numbers, especially assists, are better, but his first year was considered by many, one of the best rookie seasons of the modern era. James also had a much better supporting cast – Carlos Boozer and Zydraunas Ilgauskas cleared a lot of room for him and finished most of his passes with baskets. On a team where only one other player scores in double figures (Wilcox) and only two players shoot above 45% (Wilcox and Nick Collison), an assist, or help in general, is hard to come by.

You can force the argument here that Durant’s numbers are inflated because of this, but that only extends as far as points per game and Durant’s usage rate is not extraordinarily high for a top player at 28.9% (it is in the league’s top 10, but again, look to his supporting cast). His player efficiency rating is also right at the league average of 14.9, a number miles above anyone else on the team except for Wilcox and Collison, so the evidence shows that Durant is the best suited on this team to use the lion’s share of the possessions.


Link

Lebron’s rookie year

Durant’s rookie year

Wow they look pretty similar don’t they? I wonder if Kevin Durant is the next Lebron James?

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 29, 2008 11:07 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There is no next Lebron

Did you know that Lebron now has his weight up to 260 lbs. with 5% body fat. Factor in that he’s stronger than any other wing player in the league, quicker than most point guards, and has godly athleticism. Then add in that he’s the best player in the league. There will not be another Lebron.

I agree with everything else you wrote though.

by roundhouse on Jul 30, 2008 1:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Supposedly

Oden has kept his remarkable body fat down to 6% or so as well, plus added the 20-30LBS of muscle.

They’re gonna keep toning him down like they say they want to (less weight on the knee the better), but he seemed to do a good job at not getting tubby when he couldn’t move around much.

Lebron James and Greg Oden are just freaks of nature physically. They never lifted weights, never worked out beyond basketball before the NBA, and still were naturally complete beasts and had the 5% body fat. It’s insane. Once you put them on a NBA diet and weight training regimen, the results are astounding.

Oh, and you probably got it, but Dheepan wasn’t saying Durant is the next Lebron, just pointing out the illogical assumption S n’ P was making just by comparing Durant’s raw stats next to a so-so player’s rookie year. You could just as easily say Durant is the next Lebron by looking at the similar numbers and percentages; it’s shortsighted in both cases, which is Dheepan’s point.

Judging 19 year olds as a finished product is silly no matter who they are, or how ballyhooed they came into the league.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 30, 2008 2:51 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yep

I was about to type it out. Then you did.

And you’re telling me they never lifted? What are you serious? Jesus.

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 30, 2008 2:53 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Genetics Genetics Genetics

They’re just naturally gifted with muscle and bulk and have the frames (and body types) that just get stronger and bigger. They are truly freaks of nature, physically.

They both also look much older than they really are, and even share the EXACT same nose.

Are they related? I say, scientifically, yes.

They both had no reason to lift and get strong before the NBA, and neither do most 19 year old NBA prospects. Plus, you take their first regimen of weight training (where you always get amazing results, the 1st time), add in diet and smart exercise, and you get monsters like Lebron and Oden.

Someone like Durant will get BIGGER than he is, but never as big and strong as a Lebron because of his genetics (most likely). His natural muscle mass just ain’t gonna be big.

I still say he’ll be pretty dang good, and he works too hard to not be good, but that’s aside the point right this minute.

So, Oden was naturally very strong, now he’s even stronger and just needs to keep up the pilates, get that core STRONG, stay super flexible, and me n’ you start scheduling flights to the championship parade!

Mortimer!

by Mortimer on Jul 30, 2008 1:06 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Come on guys...

...first of all, they weren’t net stats. Secondly, the stats tell a story and the story they tell is that both KVH and KD in their rookie year shot the ball a ton while doing very little else to make themselves worthwhile to their team. Dheepan would have a point if he were pointing out an assumption that was based on the point I was making in the first place. I’m not saying in any way, shape, or form that KD is a finished product. What I am saying is that he’s a tall chucker who doesn’t look like he’ll be able to do anything beyond shoot a lot in order to provide value to his team. He will score 20 but he’ll take and miss a ton of shots while doing very little to share the ball or rebound. They’re both tall shooters who have to shoot a lot to score and that appears to be their biggest value.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 8:34 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're using net stats...

...KVH and KD are similar because they are long shooters with high usage rates and relatively low efficiency numbers for the amount of time they had the ball in their hands. KVH was a damn good player coming out of college and he was given the opportunity to jack it up as much as was KD and they ended up with high usage rates accompanied by less-than-stellar eff numbers. LBJ filled out his high usage rate with better efficiency numbers and he did a hell of a lot more than simply shoot the ball a ton. I couldn’t give less of a shit about drive. None of these guys get to this point in their career without having a large drive to succeed.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 8:28 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

“Dheepan would have a point if he were pointing out an assumption that was based on the point I was making in the first place”

try saying that 5 times out loud =D

Sorry for the off topic but since we’ve come this far the topic has to at least reach 100 comemnts

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 30, 2008 10:34 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True.

And in any case I’ve been thinking: what this thread needs is a couple of 8-10,000 word responses from Dheepan and Mortimer.

by plinytheelder on Jul 30, 2008 12:30 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

we are...

...almost at a hundred. It would be a shame to fall short at this point.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 1:14 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We have a tradition here in Belgium that the one who scores the 100th point (keep in mind we play 40 minute games here) has to pay a round for the team … you guys got that same tradition (if you don’t, now you do :p)

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 30, 2008 2:55 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We do our drinking...

...before the game :)

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 2:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here the tradition is: whoever can get 7 fouls by early in the third quarter of a summer league game has to buy the team a round. In other news, Chris Richard is broke.

by plinytheelder on Jul 30, 2008 3:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We'll have to come up with a good...

...J-Pete/K-Love drinking game. Maybe whenever J-Pete talks about Love’s outlet passing ability, a shot has to be taken. I’m pretty sure that’s good for a 5th of Jim Beam per game.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 3:05 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Whenever J-Pete...

rips KG or refers to Al as a future hall of famer you have to take a shot. So that’s probably about 5 shots per game.

For the hardcore alcoholics, whenever J-Pete acts if he’s infinitely smarter than the fans and as if he’s God’s gift to the planet, you have to take a shot. That’s about 80 shots per game.

by roundhouse on Jul 30, 2008 10:51 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yep...

...”what fans don’t understand” is a favorite of mine.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 31, 2008 7:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Whenever they show the photo...

...of JPete dunking on Bird I’ll buy the damn round, that picture is hot.

by plinytheelder on Jul 31, 2008 8:36 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I win

hahah!

Dead Finks Don't Talk
But dead finks don't talk too well
They've got a shaky sense of diction
It's not so much a living hell
It's just a dying fiction

WORD UP. STAY. FRESCO.

by Dheepan on Jul 30, 2008 4:10 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rounds are on Dheepan!!!

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jul 30, 2008 8:51 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Banana Milkshake for me!

by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 31, 2008 2:38 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Why Media Market Size Does Not Correlate to Endorsements
Small
Rudy Fernandez is the Solution...
Small
Why the Wolves hold the power in the Rubio situation
Small
The Wolves and the Salary Cap
Muttley_small
If we end up having to trade Ricky Rubio

Recent FanPosts

Cudder_small
Stop thinking of Flynn trades.
Small
Shawn Marion?
Small
3-Way Holiday Trade!
Small
Comparing Ricky ACB stats with other Spanish ACB phenoms
Images_small
Ed Weiland's Draft Grades
Avatar-murakami-1_small
Carmelo expects Ricky go to the NBA
Gophs_small
Rubio to stay in spain for the next 2 years??????
Avatar-murakami-1_small
Ricky, el primer paso - Ricky, the first step
Franklin2_small
Trading with the Atlanta Hawks

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop

    Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports