Multiple front-office sources said late Monday that the Sixers are closing in on a deal with the Timberwolves in which the Wolves would absorb the contracts of both Carney and Booth with a $5.2 million trade exception created by Minnesota's trade with Miami last October which included Mark Blount. It was not immediately known what financial and/or draft considerations might be included in the trade from either side.
over 3 years ago
wyn
24 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Looks like a good trade for the Wolves...
...but I’m not sure about the trade exception. From what I understand, we only have part of it left. But I’ll try to get to the bottom of it today.
As for the trade itself, it looks a little too good to be true, but if the Sixers really think they have Brand, they’ll want all the cap space they can get.
Update...
...I swear this won’t turn into 50 comments from me.
But, after a little digging, it looks like the total of Booth and Carney’s contracts comes to $2,803,283. The Blount trade exception less the Beno Udrih and Kirk Snyder trades comes to $2,797,711. When it comes to trades involving trade exceptions though, there’s a $100,000 buffer. Bottom line, it’s doable money-wise.
Memphis, the town where Carney played college ball, is also an apparent destination.
It's done...
Philadelphia 76ers forwards Rodney Carney, Calvin Booth and a future No. 1 pick have been traded to the Minnesota Timberwolves to free as much as $2 million in additional salary cap space for the Sixers to offer Elton Brand or Josh Smith, multiple league sources said.Minnesota sends Philadelphia its $2.8 million trade exception from a 2007 deal of Mark Blount to the Miami Heat.
"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us."
by Twins Territory on Jul 8, 2008 10:14 AM CDT reply actions
Lol, if the previous trade wasn’t a highway robbery, this one sure as hell is. We get a look at Carney (which feels a lot like CDR to me, think he can get us some free throws), get an extra temp Center that can block shots (and about nothing else) AND if we get a future first round, that would be completely crazy … cuz we’re giving up NOTHING…
Both players are off the books in the summer of 2010 so it doesn’t hurt our plans one bit (Carney can be restricted with a QO of 3,5 mil in that summer). If McHale pulls this off he’s officially redeemed himself as much as he possibly could have.
Only problem could be it’s getting a bit packed. Below is how I would rotate. You could off course do as Witt has done before and give brewer all 23 minutes at SG at one game and give them to Carney the next. Don’t really like that for growing consistency but it is probably better to see how a player performs when give enough minutes to get into the game…
PG: Foye (34), Telfair/someone else (14)
SG: McCants(25), Brewer (13), Carney (10)
SF: Miller (28), Gomes(15), Brewer (5)
Or would you guys do it any different?
Salary source:
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/philadelphia.htm
I don’t really understand the mechanics of this – we get these guys for nothing? There is no catch anywhere…?
I don’t know about Booth, but I remember seeing Carney at Memphis and thinking that he might be a pretty nice pro – long, smooth perimeter player who is very good in transition, nice shot, etc. This creates a bit of a logjam at that spot, but if nothing else gives the Wolves a tradeable asset, or makes McCants more expendable (I hate talking about these guys as “assets,” but I guess that’s how it’s done).
Well, we don’t get em for nothing, we have to give a “trade expception”. Which you could kinda see as a “get out of jail free card” only that it allows you to kinda like use it in a trade as if you were putting a player with that contract in the trade.
So since salaries have to match withing 25% in a trade, this trade would work:
Team A trades Player A (3mil contract) + Player B (2mil contract) to team B for Player C (5 mil contract)
Say Team A has a trade excpetion of 2 mil, how to get a trade exception, I don’t really get either, maybe someone else can enlighten us. But if Team A has that excpetion they can do this instead
Team A trades Player A (3mil contract) + trade Exception (2mil contract) to Team B for PLayer C (5mil contract)
The neat thing is that our trade exception alone is big enough to trade it to Philadelphia for Rodney Carney and Booth … plus to sweeten the deal Phil. throws in a future first rounder.
So the catch is kinda we give away that “get out of jail free card”, but in my view, we sold that card for more than what it was worth to us.
Hope this kinda explains that there’s actually no cash… How trade exceptions come to existance..
by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 8, 2008 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Where...
...are they going to put all of these guys? I don’t think they’re done trading yet. If they re-sign Gomes and a PG…well, I just don’t get where you put these guys. I wonder what sort of trade is in the works.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I have to agree,
I mean I guess you can throw a guy on the bench, but especially with Gomes still there… Wim has a nice idea for a perimeter rotation (above), but I’m not sure I agree, I really think an 8-man rotation (5 on the perimeter) is ideal for keeping people happy. My optimal situation for the perimeter would be to start Telfair (hopefully he’s here), Foye and Miller, and bring in McCants and Brewer off the bench (hence Foye plays both 1 and 2). But this leaves Gomes as odd man out – and now you throw Carney in there?
Hey, it’s a nice worry to have, and NBA seasons are full of injuries. Still, I have to agree, sounds like there are more moves to be made. Carney to Memphis for Lowry would sure be nice…
Oh Wim has just posted again. I just don’t think there are enough minutes to go around in that schema: I’d want Telfair (especially while Foye is learning the pg position) and Brewer in for longer. I don’t think 10 minutes for Carney works either, he’s not an “instant offense” guy, this isn’t enough time to get any kind of flow going – they cut his time in Philly last year and his shooting pct went way down.
by plinytheelder on Jul 8, 2008 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions
I could go with a Foye (30) and Telfair (18) but as you say, it’s probably getting just a tad too crowded there. And yea I’m a mass poster, guilty as charged. Anyway, Carney (or even rather Mccants in my view, if at all possible not that Carney is that much better but I just don’t like the persona Mccants) for Lowrey sounds great in my book.
That’d make about this I think (the ones on in front are the regular starters), with Foye pretty quickly shifting over to PG
PG: Lowrey (20), Foye (20)
SG: Foye (10), Brewer (18), Carney/Mccants (20)
SF: Miller (28), Gomes (15), Brewer (5)
On thing is clear, if you put Foye, if only parttime, at SG, there’s no way it works if we don’t have another trade.
This work better? Or would you do it differently (taking that extra trade you suggest)?
by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 8, 2008 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
The Wolves
are almost certainly looking at another trade. But even if they don’t pull something off, I think the problem how much time to give Carney and Miller is a lot better than the problem of how much time to give Jaric and Davis (which we were facing last year). And an expiring contract, a flier on a young(ish) guy, and a #1 isn’t a bad haul. It’s not two #1s for Kurt Thomas, but it ’s nothing to sneer at.
Random question for the crowd: Chicago is reportedly looking to trade Hinrich. If he’s still available on September 8 (when all the new guys can be traded with other players), is he and his $40 million/4 year contract worth some expiring contracts, and one or two picks/prospects?
you just
put em like this. That works doesn’t it? To little minutes for Carney? Brew gets 18, Gomes 15, Carney 10 … not good enough?
PG: Foye (34), Telfair/someone else (14)
SG: McCants(25), Brewer (13), Carney (10)
SF: Miller (28), Gomes(15), Brewer (5)
I wonder...
...how future and how protected that future #1 pick is.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Couple things
I’m not convinced that it’s completely done yet, but it certainly looks to be only a matter of time.
Wim, I’m hurt you’re not using our cap info and I’ll keep plugging it until you do. Besides, Hoopshype blows for contract info.
Also, the 25% + $100k buffer for trades only applies to simultaneous trades (ie those not involving trade exceptions). Non-simultaneous trades (ie those involving trade exceptions) only have $100k as a buffer.
Check out parts 67, 68 and 69 of Larry Coon’s NBA CBA FAQ for details on how trade exceptions work.
As a recent and easy example, last year Charlotte had a ton of cap room. So much so, in fact that they were able to absorb Jason Richardson’s entire salary from Golden State and still be under the cap. Therefore, they didn’t have to apply the salary matching rules. That transaction creates a trade exception for the Warriors in the amount of Richardson’s contract.
There are much more complicated situations, but the above is the gist. Someone’s able to absorb salary without giving it away, so the other team instead gets an exception that can be used later to “complete” the trade.
Wyn...
...I put the confirmation article up at the top of the main page. I’ll put something up about both players stats later this afternoon when I get some time.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I’d think the Wolves would have more moves coming too. A move with a big man or two going somewhere for a point guard.
"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us."
by Twins Territory on Jul 8, 2008 12:26 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks for correcting my trade mistake (most I know is from playing NBA Live :p and a bit from reading that CBA thing, but haven’t got around to fully reading it through) and for explaining how a trade exception comes up. I totally understand now.
Your cap info is excellent and I’ve looked at it a few times when we were talking about the Memphis trade. I used them to see that indeed we have a very good chance at landing a star in the summer of 2010. As far as I can see though, the contracts of other teams (i.e. those two from Philly) aren’t in there, so there was no other way of knowing if those two contracts were gonna be done by the summer of 2010 ^^. So since they are …
I agree SnP that the details of that pick are gonna be important to evaluate the trade .. but I don’t think he could have done anything better with it than this > get a young guy, who we might trade further, NOT give away anything we want and getting a pick in the process..
If I’m right those exceptions expire in time so good thing they used it now to get a pick.
Fair enough
Yeah, no info no other teams, but this is a Wolves site dangit! :) I’d recommend ShamSports.com for other teams, but sometimes he’s a bit behind in updating. I tend to find him the most accurate though.
I’ll update the Wolves contract info with Carney and Booth once the deal’s official.
Here’s the info on Philly’s future picks: http://prosportstransactions.com/basketball/DraftTrades/Future/76ers.htm
Looks like they have one from the Jazz from the Korver trade and then their own.
And yes, the roster is getting crowded, but if you ask me, we appear to be doing the Boston/Portland strategy of stockpiling youth and picks, then either building our own contender or trading the youth for stars. In one case it definitely worked and the other looks to be working better every day.
I agree...
about Shamsports.com. Definitely the most accurate salary information out there. But as you said, he does get behind a bit, I don’t think he’ll update his info until free agency is over.
Looks like I'm eating a little crow...
...Sham updated today! Also, my doubt on the trade actually happening has dwindled. However, it ain’t over till it’s over. We’ll see tomorrow.
But, since I did put Kevin Love’s salary in before he’s actually signed, I decided to reflect this trade in the info to be consistent.
by wyn on Jul 8, 2008 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Good problem
I agree that the backcourt is once again getting crowded. The good thing about believing you have assets that deserve playing time is that you can actually make them earn it. And while I like Carney’s potential, I don’t think he’s lived up to it yet, so its not a given that its going to be a concern.
Back to SnP’s original point—at the very least we actually used this chit (see Ratliff, Theo for the way NOT to do it). Even if Booth is inactive the entire season (or for every game except for Shaq and the Suns), and Carney is gone in 2 years, the Wolves will have the 1st round pick, which will be worth something.
And since we’re worrying about the rotation already, if Wit does his job, he’ll communicate his vision of a rotation and everyone’s roles in it, and stick with it for at least a little while. Brewer in particular needs to know he’s going to get consistent minutes (even if it’s only 18-24 a game), his role (defensive specialist and layup shooter) and (hopefully) his position (guarding the other team’s best 2 or 3, depending on the night. My preference (with today’s roster) would be to start AJ, Love, Gomes, Miller & Foye (that’s pretty good size) with McCants, Telfair and Brewer making a pretty active 2nd unit. If you leave Love/Gomes on the floor with those three, you can minimize the fact that Brewer and Telfair can’t shoot, and Love’s outlet passing can hopefully lead to more fast breaks and layups for Brewer and Telfair.
Brewer and Telfair
OK this is totally off-topic and I’m sure it has been debated on this site. But allow me to say that I think Brewer and Telfair will both become good shooters. On Brewer: do people remember the final four where he was mvp? All he did was hit spot-up 3s all tournament long. I think most of his difficulties last year were 1. yes, he needs more practice – i.e. he needs to put the work in to become a better shooter (which he seems to be doing); 2. not having a really well-defined role on the team (guard? forward? perimeter? midrange? green or yellow light to shoot?); 3. adjusting to the speed of the NBA game. If you watch him shoot, his mechanics are really nice. I’m not saying he’ll turn into Dale Ellis, but I think he can be a guy who can consistently knock down mid-range pull up jumpers (he’ll get plenty of these given his game and his size), and the occasional spot-up long one.
I basically think the same of Telfair – he needs work but the mechanics are fine, no reason he shouldn’t be able to use his quickness to become a Tony Parker-type shooter, i.e. a guy who consistently gets and makes mid-range jumpers because defenses are scared he’ll blow by them.
Note about the site
To Pliny and all of you who start excellent new conversations in post comments, I’d encourage you to write up a FanPost. You’re more than welcome to raise this stuff in the comments, of course, but your topics are often so good that they deserve their own space. You can create a FanPost by clicking “New FanPost”
There’s a community of regulars forming at Hoopus, and I really appreciate the depth of thought that comes from it. Just make sure your thoughts and comments get their due!
On the question at hand, I think you’ve got a really good point about Brewer and Telfair. The key to them becoming good shooters is practice (duh) and finding their spots on the floor. While Brewer won’t be Dale Ellis (excellent throwback, btw) he could easily be a Bruce Bowen type, where he parks in the corner on some sets and waits for the kick-out.
by wyn on Jul 8, 2008 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks,
ps love the Bowen comparison, wouldn’t that be great?
by plinytheelder on Jul 8, 2008 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions




















