Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

If I Ruled the World

 

20071001-pinky_20brain_medium

It is an interesting time for the sport of basketball.  The Olympics are in full swing, Euro League teams are grabbing decent NBA talent, there are rumors that some EL team may offer Wade, Kobe, or Lebron $50 million to bolt the Association in 2 years, and US nationals are lacing em' up for foreign countries.  If you want to get NBA-centric, the league is coming off a year that highlighted the best (KG, top flight play in the WC, young superstars) and worst (gambling, poor refereeing, aloofness of league leadership) of what the world's premier league has to offer.  Oh, and the NBA stars are still the most popular players in the world.

Cutting to the chase, basketball is the only other thing in the world outside of soccer that has the opportunity to be a truly massive global sport.  While there will always be a sense of pride for us Americans that we invented the damn game, it's time to do what we have done with blue jeans and rock and roll: embrace the global appeal and realize that it's a game that transcends borders and nationality.  In short: it's time to rethink the game in terms of international appeal and play. The NBA is not the be-all/end-all of the international game, nor should it be, and if basketball is going to make its next big jump, the NBA is going to have to give a little.

What does 'giving a little' mean fro the Association?  Here is what I would do to change the league to improve basketball and make it the soccer-challenging global sport that it deserves to be:

1- Shorten the NBA season: the Boston Celtics played 108 games this year.  The NBA season ran from late October to early June.  There were times in March and April where I literally wanted to throw my TV through the window while watching a meaningless game between the Wolves and Grizz.  There is no damn reason for 82 regular season games.  In place of the current regular schedule, I would institute a 52 game schedule: 8 games against each division rival (32), 1 game against every other team in your conference (10), and 1 game against each team in 2 divisions of the rival conference (10).  Games would be played on Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturday/Sundays (Sundays after football is over).  Teams would have 2 2-game homestands against their in-division rivals.  These would be on back-to-back nights (or Friday/Sunday after football).  The point here is that NBA games would be associated with a specific day and a greater importance would be placed on division play. This would require some realignment.  Here is how I would break it  down (UPDATED):

City Great Lake South NW Sun Mid-American
Boston Toronto Atlanta Utah LAL Indiana
Philly Cleveland Charlotte Denver LAC OKC
Nets Detroit Miami Portland Phoenix Memphis
Knicks Chicago Orlando Golden State
San Antonio
Dallas
DC Milwaukee NOLA Sacramento Houston Minny

This schedule would standardize back-to-backs and off days so no team would get burned by having 11 b2b games (see the Wolves this year) while others get 5 or 6.  It would also reduce the number of cross country road trips a team would have to take.  Home series within the division would be weekend affairs with games on Friday and Sunday or Friday and Saturday. 

2- Tourney Time: Not only is the NBA's season ridiculously long, its playoffs go on forever too.  Instead of having 16 teams play in separate 7 game series all the way up to a championship series, the top 16 teams would be divided into 4 round robin pools that would be staged on the courts of the top teams from the top 4 ranked divisions.  Ties would be broken in a single game playoff.  If 3 are tied, the team with the top record would receive a bye and would then play the winner of the play-in game.  If 4 teams are tied, the teams are seeded one through four and there will be a 2 game playoff.   The winners of the play-in pools will square off at a neutral site that will be selected on a rotating basis from each division.  For instance, year 1 will be Boston, year 2 will be Detroit, year 3 will be Memphis, year 4 will be Seattle, year 6 will be Utah, and year 7 will be Minny...before it rotates back to the City Division.  The Finals will be a Final Four tourney and will be held on Friday and Sunday in conjunction with the NCAA's Final Four (which will be held in the same city with games on the same days).  This entire process would take 3 weeks and the final four teams would be entered into a true World Championship (more on this later).

3- Clubin' It: I make no bones about it: I hate the f'ing NCAA.  The NCAA is one of the most high-and-mighty organizations around; it makes millions of dollars off of student athletes that can't get paid and who can't advance into their profession until they play at least one year for free for an organization that pretends to be about nothing more than student athletics.  That being said, there is definitely something to be said about college tradition, campus environments, and...well, the best basketball experience in the Twin Cities is over at the Barn when the Gophers have a good squad on the floor.  The problem with the NCAA is that they pretend money and pro ball aren't the engines that drive their supposedly pure product.  My solution for this would be to allow each NBA team to adopt up to 2 NCAA squads that would function as something of a club team for the pro squad.  The draft would be expanded to include high school players and incoming players would agree to play for up to 3 years at the pro team's school or schools.  For instance, the Wolves would select the U of M and Iowa and they would draft a number of high school kids that would be funneled into one of the two programs.  The colleges would get a steady stream of top notch talent as well as being able to adopt a system that would bring players up in the type of ball the pro club would play.  This would guarantee that there would be between 30-60 college programs with blue chip talent....which is pretty much what they are running now.  It would also guarantee more regional allegiance as well as expanding the fan base into the college ranks.  A team like the Wolves could draft 4-5 kids from the midwest each year and fans could follow them through their college years and hopefully every now and then one or two of them could make it to the pro squad. 

4- Standardize the rules and dimensions: an international game needs standardized rules.  A high school court in Mankato should have the same dimensions as an Olympic gym in Beijing. From goal tending to the width of the lane, basketball's rules and dimensions need to be standardized.  I find it amazing that a game with its sites on global domination can have different rules and dimensions in different places.  The NBA needs to adopt FIBA rules.  With the league getting smaller and more athletic, it's not like there are too many Al Jeffersons running around to keep the lane the way it is.  Moving the 3 point line in would also help scoring.  There is no sense in having different sets of rules and dimensions for different leagues.

5- A true world club championship: this one is simple.  After the NBA Final Four, the top teams would participate in a true world club championship with the best teams from the world's best leagues.  Right now this probably means the Euro League and Spain.  With the shortened schedule (reg season ends in mid-Feb, NBA tourney runs in March and NBA and NCAA Final Fours are held together on the same weekend in April), the World Club Championship could be held in late April/early May. 

There are a few other things that I think would work well for the NBA, but these are the five biggies.  What say you?  

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

A well thought out post..

SnP, but in regards to the pathway to pro ball and alignment of colleges, where do you see the D League? I wonder whether the problem lies in the transition from college to the pros.

And how about an outdoor game or two?

by Auswolf on Aug 11, 2008 7:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The NBA needs a feeder league

For the longest time this has been the NCAA. Once players started coming straight out of HS, the NCAA and NBA put in the ridiculous 1-and-done rule and the NCAA wants to increase that to 2 (they will eventually ask for more). The NCAA is making an insane amount of money off of college basketball. We’re literally talking billions of dollars. They’re making this money off of players that don’t get paid.

Getting around to your question, there is a place for the D League. It can exist as a league for 4 year players that don’t get into the league. It can exist for players who are trying to come back from Europe. It can’t exist as a transitional league for High Schoolers. The NCAA has everything the NBA needs as far as teaching and infrastructure goes and the only thing holding this relationship back is the NCAA’s insane notion that their game is somehow pure by them not paying their players. Everybody knows money is all over that game but there are a small group of completely detached NCAA leadership that insists otherwise. The answer here is to allow NBA to partner with NCAA teams to fill 30 or more programs with top-notch talent that a) would be paid by the pro club a’la a sort of minor league system, b) would require players to sign up for at least 3 years (the very good players could get called up at any time…this is just the base commitment for any player to be a part of pay and play), and c) would do a large part in removing some of the shady money from agents and hangers on. This would also allow the pro club to instruct the college/club players on how to deal with the issues of pro life. Perhaps the pro team could dress something like 18 players and 5 of these guys could be college kids who just come along and learn from guys already on the team. The bottom line here is that the pro team would have their eyes on their draft picks for a lot longer time and they could work with the college coaches to really develop the talent the way it should be developed. They would also get free college. The NCAA would maintain a system with 30 excellent teams. Hell, it may even bring some more parity among the upper-tier squads. In a lot of markets, it simply makes a lot of sense. Milwaukee has Marquette and UW; Chicago has DePaul and Illinois; Detroit has U fo M and MSU…and so on and so forth.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 11, 2008 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well done

This was a great follow up to a long twolvesblog post you had on this. I love the first two ideas on how to handle the NBA playoffs.

The NCAA idea is an interesting one….. I can’t envision the NCAA ever making that visible an association with the NBA. Even if the NCAA isn’t innocent they like the idea that they are.

by Pants_ on Aug 11, 2008 10:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really like your post on the whole, I agree especially that the season is way too long, 50 games or so is plenty in my mind – hell I’d even bring it down to around 40 like the college game but that’s probably asking too much. Not sure I like the round-robin playoff idea, but I agree with the principle of shortening it.

Re: the club system: I like it on the whole as well, but I would have one concern. One thing I like about the draft system in general (vs. the Euro soccer or basketball leagues) is that it would seem to bring about parity (though LA and Boston have won half the championships anyways I think?). In Europe, the same teams are good every year. I know you’re suggesting a draft system for the colleges… But my question is this: can you really tell 17-year-old kids where they have to go to college? What if I’m really interested in a certain academic program, and the college to which I’m “drafted” doesn’t offer it? If I grow up dreaming of going to Harvard (or Minnesota or UCLA or Duke for that matter) I’m going to be pretty pissed if a draft deters me. But if you let the kids choose, the very principle of the draft disappears, and the same NBA teams will be good all the time – the ones associated with UNC, UCLA, etc. Also, what about the unaffiliated college teams? Are you telling them that they will never be allowed to have NBA-caliber talent?

Oh one more thing: “there will always be a sense of pride for us Americans that we invented the damn game” – um, I hate to be the one to point this out, but…

by plinytheelder on Aug 11, 2008 11:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The inventor was Canadian.

Naismith was in Massachusetts at the time, but he is in fact a Canadian.

Unless I’m missing your nationality or a subtle joke, I don’t get what you’re saying.

by wyn on Aug 11, 2008 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it either...

...it took shape in the US and his time at Kansas set it all in motion.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 11, 2008 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh sorry...

...should have been clearer, yeah just pointing out that the inventor was Canadian.

by plinytheelder on Aug 11, 2008 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Q: "Can you really tell 17-year-old kids where they have to go to college?"

A: In order to be a part of the yearly HS draft, and to enter into a college where he would be paid and receive a free education, player x would agree to give up his choice in order to be placed on the pro track. Keep in mind that not all players would enter the draft and that if you wanted to go to Harvard, you simply wouldn’t enter the draft. However, if you choose to enter the draft, and receive a signing bonus, and receive a salary, and be placed in a coaching system that is coordinated with a pro team, this system does little more than move up the draft a few years while explicitly recognizing that the NCAA is a feeder system and addressing it as such.

As for the unaffiliated teams, how will a system where 30 teams have funneled talent be any different from what is currently in place? I’m assuming most teams will choose teams from major conferences. We’re talking about a handful of teams that are competetive anyway.

The bottom line here is that if a player wants to circumnavigate the system and go to a college of his own choice, he will then be entered back in the draft whenever he chooses to come out. He will not receive a signing bonus at the beginning of college and he will not receive a salary from the team while at school. He will, in effect, be in the old system. However, if he wants a signing bonus, and he wants to get paid…well, then he enters the HS draft.

This system would also place a tremendous focus on player development. Let’s say that the Wolves draft BJ Mullens and Jrue Holiday. It is in their best interest that both of these players devlop both physically and mentally while at the U of M. If it doesn’t work out, they still get paid while getting a degree and they can then be released and try their luck in Europe. It’s better for the NBA, it’s better for the players, and….well, the only ones who don’t make out like complete bandits are the idiots at the NCAA…and I’d even argue that they make out well enough in terms of overall competition, regional affiliation, etc, to make it worthwhile.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 11, 2008 12:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s an interesting idea, I just wonder if the potential problems don’t outweigh it. What about the Stephen Currys, Jameer Nelsons and Delonte Wests of the world – i.e. excellent players who go to non-major-conference schools? (It’s true that Curry wasn’t heavily recruited by the ACC schools, e.g. Virginia Tech, but as one of the best players in NC in high school he could definitely have played for a bigger school if he hadn’t wanted to stay close to home.) I think there are always very talented players who, for one reason or another, want to go to smaller schools, and the NCAA game is better for it.

More importantly, what happens to the “teams” in college basketball when 1 or 2 guys on the team are getting paid and the rest aren’t? This is how it would have been e.g. for Ohio State a few years ago with Oden and Conley…but this is how it would be almost everywhere. Frankly I couldn’t see NCAA basketball surviving in such a scenario – the coaches would hate it, and all the players except the 1 or 2 being paid would hate it. I just think it’s problematic to pay a couple of guys (who are going to be making pro $ soon anyways), while the other guys on the team, who are doing just as much to make insane profits for their schools and for the NCAA in general, get nothing.

I think a more realistic proposal would be for the NCAA to quit hypocritically asserting that it is an “amateur” league, and pay all the players, at least in the revenue sports like football and basketball. There are obviously problems with this too – e.g. the risk that the non-revenue sports cease to be funded. The NCAA is plenty rich without needing any help from the NBA…and let’s face it, they’re making tons of cash, in football and basketball at least, from often economically-disadvantaged kids the vast majority of whom won’t be going pro. To my mind there’s no reason that all those kids shouldn’t get paid.

by plinytheelder on Aug 11, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that some of the problems...

...with the NCAA result from pretending that things are other than what they are. I think guys like Oden and Conley do live a different style of life than “normal” players and as we saw from Mayo, this sort of thing happens whether it is sanctioned or not.

Players like Curry, Nelson and West would simply go to the school they wanted, play their best, and get drafted like they are now. The NBA would still take post 3 year players from any school in a college draft. College coaches would like it if the money fits. I guess another way around it would be to have a HS draft and take players and place them on D League teams and then pay for college while they are in the D League.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 11, 2008 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you just contract Indiana...

... and give Utah two franchises? :)

by wyn on Aug 11, 2008 1:47 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Doh!

Stupid brain. I made the change. Minny and Indy are the two most problematic teams as far as realignment goes.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 11, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One other thing...

... with the talk about realignment a month or so ago, I was toying with a Google Map. Thought I’d share it:

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=0&msid=116747914750178675688.000453cbff38bed10fe42

by wyn on Aug 11, 2008 1:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

wow that is sweet

I started working on a purely geographical breakdown and it gets tough.

Here are the main clumps… not easy shuffle to get everyone in their nearest possible division. It’d be interesting to run a computer app over the distances between arenas to create 6 divisions of 5 teams purely by analyzing the least possible travel distance.

Celtics, 76ers, Knicks, Nets, Wizards
Wolves, Bucks, Bulls, Raptors, Cavs,Pacers, Pistons
Lakers, Blazers, Kings, Jazz, Nuggets, Suns, Warriors, Clippers
OKC, Rockets, Grizz, Mavs, Spurs
Heat, Magic, Hawks, Bobcats

by Pants_ on Aug 11, 2008 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Minny, Indy, and Denver

Cause the biggest problems with making 6 divisions work for everybody.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 12, 2008 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see the divisions like this

North east – Boston, Philly, Nets, Knicks, Raptors
Mid West – Indiana, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee, Minnesota
South east – Atlanta, Charlotte, DC, Miami, Orlando
South – Dallas, Indiana, OKC, New Orleans, Memphis
North West – Utah, Portland, Denver, Golden State, Sacramento
Desert (?) – L.A., L.A., Phoenix, San Antonio, Houston

by The Inevitable Muck-up on Aug 11, 2008 4:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Casper's 2010 Big Board and Mock Draft 3-08-2010
No-seagulls_small
Fake Wolves Team Recap from the Future
Small
Defensive player of the year

Recent FanPosts

No-seagulls_small
Quick thoughts on Wall, Turner, and Cousins
Franklin2_small
In Which Half are the Wolves?
Small
a rare optimistic take on the Wolves, courtesy of TrueHoop
Small
The votes are in!
Rickyrubio_small
Two Lists of Players, Free Agents, and Prospects we should look at in filling our two biggest needs, an Athletic, Shot Blocking Big Man, and an Athletic, Scoring, Wing.
Small
The Charlotte Pick (dun dun dun)
Wolveslogo_small
Prowling the NBA: March 7 - How did you get so many Q's?
Small
Darko warming to the Wolves?
Small
Game Recap: Houston please don't laugh at our problem.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko

    Misc:

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS

    SBNation.com Recent Stories

    Los Angeles Lakers' Kobe Bryant passes against the Phoenix Suns during the second half of an NBA basketball game Friday, March 12, 2010, in Phoenix. The Lakers won 102-96. (AP Photo/Matt York)

    Kobe's Near Triple Double Helps Lakers Eclipse Suns

    Oklahoma City rookie guard James Harden dunks the ball over San Antonio guard Manu Ginobili of Argentina during the third quarter of an NBA basketball game at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009. (AP Photo/ Bahram Mark Sobhani)

    James Harden Out 2-4 Weeks With Hamstring Injury

    WASHINGTON - MARCH 11: Jamal Crawford #11 of the Atlanta Hawks shoots against James Singleton #22 of the Washington Wizards at the Verizon Center on March 11, 2010 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Ned Dishman/NBAE via Getty Images) link

    Hawks Hold Off Wizards 105-99

    More from SBNation.com >


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop