Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Josh Wilson's Annotated Hit Parade Bar-right-arrows



Golden

Img214582206_medium

(Photo Credit: Getty Images)

Finally, a competitive men's basketball game. If anyone doubted the need for three point or outside shooting acumen during this Olympic tournament, please replay the fourth quarter of the US-Spain gold medal contest. Having been blown out by the USA'ers just last week in pool play, Spain played like defending World Champs, losing only by 11, 118-107. The game was much closer than the score indicated; Spain employed a zone defense, limiting USA's decided edge in points off of turnovers, and getting some inspired point guard play from Juan Carlos Navarro.

With Jose Calderon on the shelf due to a groin injury, Navarro ran the team effectively, hitting shots off of curls and runners. The Spainards were actually able to cut the score to within two mid-fourth quarter with a 9-0 run, but clutch play and outside shooting from Kobe Bryant and Dwayne Wade sealed the deal for the USA'ers. Bryant in particular finally played big time in the fourth, coaxing Rudy Fernandez into his fifth foul and a resulting four point play opportunity. The bonded relationship between Coach K and Bryant was never more evident than it was today, with Krzyzewski seemingly handing the keys (and often the ball) to Bryant after Spain repeatedly cut the score to within one or two possessions throughout the final quarter. 

Although shooting a respectable 51 percent for the game (47 percent from three point range), Spain missed numerous chances to score with point blank misses, or open looks from the outside. At times when offensive discipline and ball movement was needed, Spain looked instead for alley oops, and spectacular baskets. For the game, Spain actually won the "points in the paint" war 56-50, but at key times it's front court--particularly anyone else not named Pau Gasol--couldn't convert an easy look. USA's athleticism was on display, blocking and stripping shots, but I have to believe Spain will look back on this game and kick themselves over their lost opportunities. With a few more breaks and some luck, they might have been able to strike real fear in the hearts of the USA contingent.

The Redeemers, having their points off of turnovers edge effectively reduced to only six points for the entire game, played more in the half court. USA shot an excellent 60 percent overall, but more importantly hit 46 percent on 13 of 28 shooting from the three point line. Unlike Athens in 2004, they were able to make their opposition pay just enough for employing it's zone, although it was only needed for this one game. Of all the head scratching that's been done regarding why the USA shot so much from the outside--given their obvious athletic edge--this game explains it. Could they have won otherwise? Maybe. But, anything less than USA gold would have again sent reverberations around the world.  The fact they outscored Spain today 39-24 from three point range, as well as a 16-2 edge in fast break points tells anyone wanting to listen that not only did this team play to its strength, they also improved on their weaknesses.

USA's depth had it's impact in this tournament, but the fact that so many international stars play in the NBA these days, and basketball is so global represents a shift in how teams are playing. I didn't see as much the ball movement and team play as in years past, I saw teams wanting to play more like the NBA'ers. The world wide melding of hoops play has truly begun; I'm not sure what that means for the future of USA men's basketball.

It's been advocated here by my colleague SnP for the NBA to adopt FIBA rules. I think rules unification makes a lot of sense. In the women's game, for example, since the ladies already make a majority of their money playing internationally, there isn't as much of an issue, but everyone should be playing the same game, period. Economics plays a much bigger role on the men's side, given the steep disparity of men's salaries to women's. However, since Stern and the Gang want to globalize the NBA, and we've seen already the exodus of mid level talent like Childress and Boykins to the Euroleagues, either the global economic market will naturally force change, or folks will decide to change the market themselves. Either way, the 2008 USA Olympic Gold Medal win may be the last time we see basketball exactly like this again.

0 recs | Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I like your point about offensive discipline, I think it really highlights how much Spain missed Calderón. As well as Rubio and Navarro played, I think the single biggest factor in the U.S.‘s win was tempo – they absolutely controlled it. Doug Collins made a good point in the second quarter, saying that while Spain is keeping it close, the closeness is artificial, because they are playing exactly the kind of game the U.S. wants – the halftime score needed to be something like 48-40 instead of 69-61 for Spain to have a chance. Again, as well as he played, I think much of the fault here lies with Rubio, if only because he’s a 17-year-old kid, and 17-year-olds like to run. (Navarro as well, who took over a lot of the ball handling in the second half, but he’s a scorer, not a point guard.) The tempo of the game would have been completely different with Calderón leading the show. Don’t get me wrong, I love Rubio and think he’ll be a good NBA player (better than Calderón in fact, which for me is saying a lot), but this was just way too fast for Spain to have a chance.

Nice to see the U.S. play so well though – nice because they played so well as a team compared to the last several editions of U.S. teams. I suppose most of these guys will remain with the USA basketball program? That bodes well for the world championships 2 years from now.

by plinytheelder on Aug 24, 2008 5:10 PM CDT   0 recs

I think it should be noted...

…that this is as close of an NBA game that a non-NBA team has ever played in international competition. I will disagree a bit with plinytheelder about the pace of the game; this is how Spain plays. They are an up-tempo NBA-style team that is known for its uptempo play and they showed that they are clearly the 2nd best team in the world.

If D-Wade is healthy and Lebron signs up in 4 years, the next version of Team USA could be even better than this squad. Guys like Howard, Paul, and Bosh will be firmly in their prime and hopefully some younger guys like Kevin Martin and Greg Oden can develop into the outside shooter and big man that this squad needs.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 24, 2008 7:24 PM CDT   0 recs

Good point.

I should nuance my comments. As you say, Spain does indeed play like this, and they looked mighty comfortable throwing lobs and getting out on the break. I just think Calderón is the perfect example of the settling influence of a PG; Rubio, while fantastic, isn’t as good in this regard. Not that Calderón isn’t comfortable playing at a fast pace, but his decision making is impeccable, whether in half court or on the break; and given the way Spain played – fast, yes, but also ragged at times (not to suggest the excellent D played by the Americans didn’t have something to do with that) – I think he would have helped enormously.

by plinytheelder on Aug 24, 2008 7:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Given the multi-year committment that USA basketball wants..

I’m not sure who’s going to be on the club. Some of these guys already have two Olympics and four years of time under their belt. I’m just not sure we’ll see the same commitment in two or four years. Here’s something totally off the wall though; wouldn’t it be something if they did truly internationalize the game and eventually hold championships that every fourth year could be brought under the Olympic umbrella? I realize it would damage the whole “nation-state” competition concept, but with all the changing allegiances, maybe the Olympics should be should simply about the world’s best athletes getting together. They can save the national pride for sports like track and field and swimming. Our top players wouldn’t be risking as much wear and tear as they do now.

by Peter W on Aug 24, 2008 7:48 PM CDT   0 recs

I was thinking about something like this...

…with the recent post on what I would do to change the game. I’m of two minds about this. On one hand you have soccer with the World Cup. I’ve heard many soccer fans say that the Olympics are meaningless for soccer because the real championship is the World Cup and that soccer shouldn’t even be in the Olympics because the WC is just as big as the Olympics. On the other hand, basketball isn’t there yet and it might be a way to really open up the game to new audiences by tying it to the Olympics. I’m not sure how you’d work out the club v. country angle, but maybe every 4 years you do the country championship while the other 3 get world club championships. I think soccer should be the model and there should be a champions league tourney and a world country championship every 4 years.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Aug 25, 2008 9:28 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The European Champions League (soccer) works...

because there is TV rights revenue, prizemoney and prestige (in that order) available to qualifying clubs. The World Club Championship is a poor second cousin.

Soccer should be taken out of the Olympics; it is an underage competition (with an allowance for three over age players). It is a distant second to the World Cup.

I think a World Club Championship in basketball is of dubious worth. Difficult to fill a tourney with teams that could run with an NBA or Euro League champion. You would just end up with another Olympic tournament where there is one standout team that wins it unless it shoots itself in the foot or an opponent plays out of it’s skin.

by Auswolf on Aug 26, 2008 4:51 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's where the difference would lie...

 the globalized game would be less of a nation-state affair, allowing professional athletes to compete on their teams, not having to submit to extra duty for their country. I think it actually would tend to balance things out after awhile, because people would go where the money is, given the shift in economies. You could still go the national route for sports that aren’t consumer driven—like track and field, swimming, archery, but this acknowledges a certain sort of economic pragmatism, and hopefully you would see many more of the hoopsters able to compete.

by Peter W on Aug 26, 2008 6:13 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What a great game. Enjoyed it!

Agree on unification of the rules. I think everyone agrees and they’re already doing it. You just have to give it some time. Remember what a problem it was the ball changed? Imagine what problems it would give if suddenly the rules completely changed overnight. Give it some time, I’m sure we’re going the right direction.

by Wim (Belgium) on Aug 25, 2008 3:39 AM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Fab_five_small
2009 Draft
Small
The Ultimate Trade
Small
DON'T PANIC
Mn_basketball_small
Which Trio would you rather have?
Wolfen_small
Why doesn't McCants get a CHANCE to start??
Wolfen_small
Point Guard & The Timberwolves...
001234202_small
outlet passes
Mn_basketball_small
Why not make a trade...
Gophs_small
Pink Slips have been given
Me_small
Should Mike Miller get a haircut?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Next Game

Minnesota Timberwolves
@ Detroit Pistons

Sunday, Nov 23, 2008, 5:00 PM CST
The Palace of Auburn Hills

Complete Coverage >

Self-Promotion

BallHype Sports Blog Rankings


Managers

Dr wyn

ad

Site Meter