Extension for the Young, Black and Gifted One?
As the summer of money for the Draft Class of 2004 winds down, only three members of the 2005 class have received extensions so far:
- #1 pick Andrew Bogut got $60 million over 5 years from the Bucks (plus $12 million in potential incentives)
- Deron Williams and Chris Paul both got max deals for 4yrs with player options for both (about $64 million right now, but could change with annual cap calculations).
As other members of the class get some extension buzz (Danny Granger and Andrew Bynum to be specific), our very own Rashad McCants hasn't been mentioned at all.
McHale and Co. have until October 31st (essentially two months from now) to sign Shad, or else he'll become a restricted free agent after this season. Until that date, the Wolves can add up to 5 years onto his deal and up to the max in amount (about $15.4 million for Shad next year). As always, see Larry Coon's FAQ for more detail.
Shad's obviously not a max player and the extensions given thus far don't provide a basis for comparison with what Shad could reasonably expect. He's in the same position most 1st round picks find themselves in at the end of their scale contract: cash in early for security, or hold off and bet you're market rate will go up.
While his perimeter scoring is something the Wolves have needed the past few seasons, with Mike Miller on board and a presumably healthy Foye in the backcourt, McCants may find his scoring role diminished in comparison to last year. Given his high self-confidence, however, I fully expect Shad to hold off for free agency next year.
But what does that mean for the team's overall cap situation? If McCants got a deal slightly above the MLE at about ~$6 million per year, that would put a noticeable crimp in any free agency plans being laid out for '09 or '10. Not to mention that Randy Foye will be up for a pay raise for 2010.
The Wolves may end up having to choose between Shad or a free agent. Shad's a quality player, but my gut (been wrong before) tells me that the Wolves would rather get a shot at a free agent than sinking $6 to 8 million per year into Shad.
0 recs |
8
comments
Read Related
Comments
I think they will choose cap flexibility.....
particularly as Shaddy is no one’s idea of a lock for a starting role. $8 mill per is a lot for a bench player and makes him impossible to move on should it all go pear shaped down the track.
by Auswolf on Sep 2, 2008 5:34 AM CDT 0 recs
Don’t like him. He doesn’t seem smart enough to be able to grasp anything Defense. Though I might be proven wrong during this season, I hope he’s outta here.
by Wim (Belgium) on Sep 2, 2008 6:26 AM CDT 0 recs
As much as I am not a big McCants fan...
I think it would be hard for McHale to admit another one of his top draft picks didn’t quite pan out. They re-signed Smith after all, and THAT didn’t make much sense either. The smart thing to do, however, would be to try and deal him, much like Davis/Blount during last preseason.
by Peter W on Sep 2, 2008 6:32 AM CDT 0 recs
good point
No sense doing anything just yet. But if it turns out that Foye is healthy and deserving of 35 minutes a night (and all the shots that he thinks he will deserve) and Miller is your designated long-range threat, then Shaddy becomes expendable. Especially if Brewer has shown any offensive improvement at all.
Of course, you have to be intrigued by the thought of Telfair, Brewer, Love and Shaddy playing together — brewer creating havoc, Bassy pushing the tempo, Love chucking 60-foot outlet passes — all of those would help Shaddy get out on the break (he seemed to be one of the few guys inclined last year to do that on a consistent basis other than Brewer).
Also, Miller is only under contract through 09, and the team option is a significant bump in 2010. So you have to decide what the relative value is between Shaddy and Miller, most likely. Because keeping Miller is going to have a significant impact on your cap in 2010 as well.
by Sterno on Sep 2, 2008 7:23 AM CDT 0 recs
He’s a solid player. They need to get rid of Brewer and Telfar.
NBA Gauntlet for team and player analysis
by mindfeck on Sep 2, 2008 10:39 AM CDT 0 recs
Very little downside...
…to the wait and see. They will still have RFA right to him so IF a lightbulb come on and he is fantastic they could still keep him. Given the injury in year two he is still a bit of a unknown.
by Pants_ on Sep 2, 2008 3:28 PM CDT 0 recs
Generally the guy gives me a stomach ache
I can’t see resigning him at $6M per given what he has shown. Generally if he has 30 minutes on the floor, 3-6 of them are really good minutes. Once a month he blows up. I remember a report from the visitors’ locker room early last season where some Wizards players were openly laughing about Shaddy having the biggest ego in the league for never having done anything. Given his three year body of work, I couldn’t agree more.
by A.K. Agikamik on Sep 9, 2008 2:10 PM CDT 0 recs














