Mike Miller Trade Watch
I predict it's going to get hot and heavy over the next few weeks with teams clamoring to acquire Miller. Seems the first team interested is Jersey and that we want no less than a pick and a young player (source: nj.com). I say forget hardball. If you can get Sean Williams straight up for Miller, who cares about getting a pick. I've wanted Williams all season. Exactly the kind of player we need. Long and athletic interior player. Wonder who else will come a callin'.....
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed
Sean Williams is the guy I would want but who else needs to be involved to make the the numbers work?
Not sure but
any number of players could be thrown in. Bigs – rhino, Booth, Cardinal, Collins. Would love to unload McCants but I fear that nobody wants him. I recall Shaddy himself saying that Mike Brown (Cavs coach) had basketball hardwood for him earlier this year, but there is no good young post players on that team that interest me at all. Back to Miller, I’m not sure how the numbers would work trading for Williams. Maybe somebody could do a realGM query for us….
nah mayn....
i mean besides de fact dat we shuddint trad de boy Mike Miller mayn Sean Williams aint de answer mayn der’s a reason he in de doghouse mayn he stay cheifin on de haze mayn remeba mayn dat kill mayn nah mean.
if we cud git him fo Rhino or a contract doe i wud be like aight mayn less do dat im trynna git summa dat piff anyways mayn
MAYN HOL UP!
I wit you Mayn
Hollinger on Williams – “Most similar player at age….Jackie Butler”
umm..we aleady tried that.
by highpockets on Jan 22, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions
It would have to be
Miller + either Madson or McCants (who can be jettisoned after this year) for Williams and Bobby Simmons or Williams and Stromile Swift and Trenton Hassel (which would be better for the Wolves because Swift is expiring; Simmons has one more year—just like Miller.
I don’t particularly love Williams, but I’d make that deal if that was the best I could get for Miller. Williams has some value.
by Eric in Madison on Jan 22, 2009 11:35 AM CST reply actions
Nets trade
Any trade with NJ involving Mike Miller will probably net the Wolves Stro Swift + etc because their salaries most closely match.
Swift + Williams for Miller works.
Other “etc” pieces from NJ that might be added: Maurice Ager, Jarvis Hayes
Swift, Ager, and Hayes are all expiring contracts.
Draft picks –
Nets 1st rounder this year is probably mid/upper teens
Nets 1st’s in 2010 are their own + unprotected 1st from Dallas (JKidd trade)
What they need to do is pry Lopez from the Nets using Miller/McCants or Miller/Smith, i would even be willing to part with a late first rounder. I know the salaries don’t match the Nets would have to throw in some garbage to make it work.
If i was the Nets i would seriously consider a Miller/Smith/draft pick deal for Lopez.
Agreed, I think they see Lopez as their big man of the future.
by plinytheelder on Jan 22, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
I’d consider it with the pick attached. Definitly not straight up. Don’t go overboard on Mike. He might be struggeling that doesn’t mean he’s written of just yet.
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
I agree, Miller is in a shooting slump he will pull out of it. I think with a pick and maybe change Smith with Carney or Brewer the Nets need to look at that.
by LV on Jan 22, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
an alternative take on Miller
I’m pretty dumb with contracts, but Eric in Madison noted that Miller has one year left on his. Therefore, I wonder if trading him is such a good idea? Here’s my rationale. The guy is to my mind a pretty damn good player. He’s basically a very good shooter – the best on the team to my mind – who’s in a horrible slump. That’s what happens to shooters, especially shooters on new teams, who have had nagging injuries all year, and with undefined roles/varying playing time. Anyways I know I’m not saying anything most people don’t know, but my point is that he’s going to break out of the slump. The maddening thing is one never knows when…but it will happen. I mean this guy averaged, what, 18/5/4 or something ridiculous like that one year with Memphis? The guy is really good.
One key thing about Miller is that he was ecstatic about coming here. Said he wanted to finish his career here. He’s what, 28 or 29? So let’s say the Wolves keep him, and he finishes his contract. That puts him at around 30. Now the Wolves are in the interesting position of signing him for a lower number, given that he’s in his 30s and really wants to be here. So what do we have? An instant-offense type 6th or 7th man who can hit the 3 as well as anyone and isn’t very expensive. What team wouldn’t want that…even a team like the Wolves, if as they are hoping they hit their stride in 3 or 4 years?
Don’t get me wrong, I’d deal him too if the right deal came up. But I think the best possible approach to any trade involving Miller is patience, patience, patience. I don’t know anything about Williams, but from some of the comments here I wonder if we can do better. At some point – whether this year or next, or the offseason – I’d say chances are a really good team in need of a shooter is going to come calling, at which point we might get a very attractive package in return for Miller. If not, we get one of the best shooters in the game coming off the bench for potentially the next 4-5 years – sounds good to me.
I wouldn’t want Williams he’s another Shaddy attitude character. I wouldn’t do the deal with the Nets unless it involved Lopez period. If the Nets are not willing to part with Lopez then keep Miller or find a new team.
by LV on Jan 22, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
You could be right on that
But for the tiny amount of money on Williams’s contract, it’s worth the risk to try putting a swatter next to Kevin “White Castle” Love and “Scowlin’ Al”. Lopez created a new, welcomed set of problems for the Nets long-term, as he looks like a franchise center (and will expect to get paid like one).
I think the Wolves don’t make any of these deals with the Nets—yet. New Jersey is looking at getting squeezed out of the playoffs, and will get more desperate as the trading deadline nears. If the Wolves don’t move Miller, they’ll just have an even more attractive asset a year from now. But if they do wait on the Nets, they may be able to pry Boone or Najera and a pick out of New Jersey.
Boy do none of those guys excite me. I used to like the idea of Sean Williams but I tend to agree with the sentiment above that he is a bad seed.
Point taken.
But Mike Miller ain’t exactly LeBron. Besides, since the Wolves OBVIOUSLY won the Love-for-Mayo trade straight up, anything extra we get for Miller is icing on the cake (heh heh).
more attractive asset
there you’ve hit it. next year, he’s got an expiring deal. next year, the wolves will have a different look to the roster by virtue of having practically half of the first round picks in the draft. someone will need to move. you could deal miller and one of those two dozen first rounders for a respectable piece to fit in wherever the roster seems to need it most. miller’s contract will only be more appealling next year, why rush it when the team’s in the middle of a makeover?
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
Millers "slump"
I have run some numbers on this slump of Millers and it has been noted @ Twolves Central that Miller isn’t in a slump, he’s just not shooting the ball. This year he is shooting 3’s at a clip of .106 attempts per minute played. The last 5 years (including the trade from Orl to Mem) his WORST shooting clip was .122 and his “average” attempts are .144, not counting this year. He is not in a slump, he is just flat out not shooting the ball. If he picks up the pace, maybe his shooting percentage goes up and he becomes the player we thought we traded for.
Sometimes the obvious is hidden.
by frankenhoops on Jan 27, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions
He...
…still is averaging career or 5 year lows in win shares, ortg, usg, efg, ts, per, fg, 3p%, fta, and points.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I think there are 2 issues...
…with Mike Miller: performance and value. You can measure performance with whatever metric you want but I think value goes something like this: performance/salary. Miller could get his shot back and play solid ball but that doesn’t change what his value should be to the Wolves based on how he has played in the past and what his season averages typically are.
For everyone wanting to keep him around, are 2 more years of $9-10 mil for Miller’s numbers going to get the Wolves to where you want them to go? If he does stick around, what do you think he will resign for?
My personal thought on this is that I hope the Wolves are bluffing and trying to stir up additional teams to get in on the action because if the Nets had a toaster with a $10 mil expiring salary the Wolves should be begging that they trade it for Mike Miller. The only other caveat is that if they think he is a legit part of a viable sign-and-trade during the off-season. Otherwise, his salary keeps them from doing what they need to do: become players in the 09/10 free agency market. I’d much rather see them take a run at Marvin Williams with some of their draft assets than I would see them bring aboard another guaranteed salary (Nets’ 1st rounder) on an improving team + a replacement value player in Williams. Miller’s biggest worth is if his value (performance/salary) can be converted into a superior ratio….whether that be for a young player worth something (who the Nets won’t part with) or a 09 free agent.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Well said...
There should be several options at SF potentially available to the Wolves if they can position themselves correctly: Ariza, Marvin Williams, Josh Childress… If they can get a large expiring deal for Miller they would essentially be the sole high roller this offseason. They could do whatever they wanted. (Just don’t max out Ben Gordon or something…)
Incidentally, Swift’s expiring deal of $6 million + Josh Boone works. Boone isn’t chopped liver by any means (he’s been much better than Williams, for instance), and he’s still 24. He’d be more than servicable as the athletic yin to Al and Love’s wide-bodied yang up front. He’d also rival Sam Cassell and Ervin Johnson for “ugliest Wolves player of all time,” which is sort of cool.
PLINEYDELEADER
“hits the hammer on the nail!!!!!”
mayn you sed it wut i been trynna say fo a long time righ der mayn!! MIKE MILLER IS DE ANSWER TO OUR PROBLEMS. why dont yall see dis. I’m not trynna sound like J Pete, but he MUCH more den a shooter on de offensive end. He loves Minny. We’ll trade him and he will break out uv his slump and we’ll be stuck wit…Maurice Ager and Sean Cheifein on de haze Williams?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? NAH MAYN!!!!
MAYN HOL UP!
Miller should be the answer
but it’s just not working right now. Outside of his shooting, he’s probably having the best year of his career (of course, there is a big despite/because of question with that). While I like Miller a lot, if trading him would net Marvin Williams or Josh Childress in the offseason, I’m not sure the Wolves can pass it up, especially if they could get a future first rounder in the deal
Hell...
…they should try and sign him back with an MLE in 2 years when he hits the free agency market if they really want him that bad.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I love it
McCants for a bag of balls and Miller for a toaster. Now if we could get a coffee pot for Collins, we would be all set.
There is no market for Miller. 2 more years, $9M each for a slow, 6’8" shooting guard who has lost all confidence in his shot. Be honest. Could you even get a toaster?
Let’s turn our focus to Smith. His recently improved play (offensive) still gives me hope that we could trade him to someone who needs post scoring and can afford to give up post defense. I still like Noah and with Paxson’s strange press conference yesterday, maybe, just maybe, we could pull it off (with appropriate filler – ie McCants)
Weird press conference yesterday? Could I get a link (yes you can call me lazy ;) ).
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
by Wim (Belgium) on Jan 23, 2009 4:16 AM CST up reply actions
Miller doesn't seem to worried about the rumors...
… but of course, what’s he supposed to say?
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_11530954?source=rss
www.canishoopus.com
What's he supposed to say?
“It’s basketball. It was invented by James Naismith.” ;)
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Context...
….here:
Not anymore. Now you can add “Miller can’t shoot” to the complaint of “Miller won’t shoot.” In the eight games (7 of them Wolves’ wins) of 2009, Miller is a wretched 31.3% from the field (15 for 48) and 15.4% from long range (4 for 26). Asked about his inability to score just before getting on the plane to Phoenix last week, Miller’s response to the young Strib writer Brian Stensaas reeked of condescension: “I take what’s there. It’s called basketball; James Naismith invented it a long time ago.”
Well, that’s some haughty bullshit.
Well called by Britt.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
A few more points about Miller...
First, I don’t think he’s as unathletic as people say. If he’s slower than, say, OJ Mayo and Brandon Roy (to use 2 MN bĂŞtes noires), it’s not by much. I know he gets blown by once in a while, but here are a couple of counter-examples: first, remember the play on which he got his last injury? He got that injury while guarding a supposedly more athletic guy (unfortunately I can’t remember who – anyone remember?) – he forced him to the baseline, got his body low and his hands up, and forced the guy to take a low-pct shot from behind the backboard. In fact Miller’s good D contributed directly to his injury: the guy he was guarding landed in a weird place precisely because Miller made him do something he didn’t want to do, and then Miller came down on his foot. Second example: how easily has Miller been getting to the basket the last few games? And making plays (scoring or assists) at the basket? You don’t do this without at least a modicum of quickness.
Second, and regarding the Robson article: I agree that Miller’s quote is, as Robson called it, haughty. Then again, put yourself in his shoes: you’re on an exhausting road trip, you’ve had nagging injuries all year long, and you’re going through the worst shooting slump of your career (as everyone who’s had one – i.e., everyone – knows, slumps are absolute hell)…and some kid asks you why you can’t shoot straight? Look, I know the quote was out of line…I just sometimes wonder how these guys don’t blow their top every 5 minutes.
Third, re: Robson’s point about Miller being reluctant to shoot – I have to admit, I haven’t really seen this. Maybe it’s because I watch many games on a crappy little window on my computer screen. But the only shots I’ve seen him pass up are really bad shots. When he’s open and he’s in rhythm, it seems to me that he shoots the ball. Am I missing something?
Fourth, the slump has been going on for long enough that I’m beginning to wonder if something else is going on – i.e., if, as Robson asks, he’s got an injury that either he or the team isn’t admitting. If so, then I think Robson’s right: he needs to rest until he’s better.
Last point: I’m not completely opposed to a trade. I would love to get Childress if, as McCleak suggested, that might be possible. But I don’t want to trade him just because somebody’s “more athletic.” Williams, for example…I haven’t been all that impressed by what I’ve seen of him. Miller, when he’s at his best, is just a hair below all-star level. I’d really like to see him play that way for the Wolves.
The guy is making $9 million dollars a year
and part of that is having the media around all the time. Deal with it. Stensaas’ question was completely appropriate. Miller is playing like shit, and he wanted to know why.
I guess you want him to get interviewd by Sid Hartman, so he can tell him how great of an addition to the team he is and how great he has been playing and throw him some nice softball questions and we can all live happily ever after.
noooo...
I don’t know why you bring Hartman in? Anyways don’t get me wrong, I know Miller’s making lots of money, and I have nothing against Stensaas. I weighed my words when I used the term “some kid” in my comment – I was exaggerating a bit to emphasize the point – but I have read and like Stensaas, he often fills in on Zgoda’s blog and I think he’s great, he works hard and has tons of energy. All I’m saying is this: I can see how once in a while people get frustrated. This doesn’t excuse the behaviour, but I do think it provides a bit of context for it. If you’re really frustrated (say, by a shooting slump) and you get interviewed 200 times, chances are that 1 time in 200 you’re going to say something out of frustration.
I’m not sure “playing like shit” is entirely accurate either – his outside shooting has indeed been terrible, as were his FT misses the other day, but Miller isn’t Steve Kerr, i.e. a guy who is useless if his shot isn’t falling – on the contrary, he does other things that make him valuable even when his shots aren’t falling.
by plinytheelder on Jan 23, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions
He has been their best playmaker in the last few games...
….he was even running point for a few possessions in the loss in Utah. His trade value to the team is separate from his play. That much off the cap = a lot of flexibility regardless of how he’s playing.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
mayn hol up
aight mayn i really juss st8 up dont understand dis mayn. Miller’s contract isnt ridiculous mayn, so u sayin we shud trade him so we can sign sum1 dis offseason? Who mayn? i’m not trynna overpay Trevor Ariza although dat boy thowed. i’d rather have Miller mayn! so who wud we sign dis free agent class not dat thowed mayn
LESS GIT DIS W TONIGHT MAYN
MAYN HOL UP!
I like Miller,
but I can understand S/P’s point too – it’s a question of what kind of future one envisions for the Wolves, I think. I personally tend toward keeping him, but I think S/P’s point is a good one – i.e. that “trade value is separate from play,” and that even though losing him might be tough, it might be worth it down the line.
by plinytheelder on Jan 23, 2009 5:46 PM CST up reply actions
What can Miller help this team do over the next 2 years?
Win 5 more games per year if he’s playing well? Then what after 2010? How much do you pay him then? Moving him gives this team a ton of cap space this year. Enough to make a run at Marvin Williams or Ariza. Add in a point with the draft and I think they have to feel good about their chances going forward.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
i juss dont think either uv dem
are remotely close to Mike Miller. In de next two years he can help dis team grow and make de playoffs, which wud be a HUGE thing for de wolves confidence and der fan base mayn…maybe if we got potential he’ll sgn a reasonable deal since he trynna stay in MN right?
i honestly think trading him would be a basketball and cultural disaster mayn.
MAYN HOL UP!
also i wud rather keep Carney
den give Ariza ridiculous amounts of money. Much more dne it’ll cost for carney
MAYN HOL UP!
this is an interesting point...
I don’t see Ariza play enough, pretty much all I know about him is that he’s an outstanding athlete…but is he really more valuable than Carney right now? Honest question – I just don’t know.
by plinytheelder on Jan 23, 2009 10:52 PM CST up reply actions
I don’t think NJ have enough trade assets to acquire Mike Miller. They won’t part with Vince/Harris/Lopez/Yi nor should they, and I wouldn’t be that interested in the rest of their youth, not at the cost of Mike Miller.
If they’d include a first round draft pick and expiring contracts it may be worthwhile (which someone will offer the Wolves). Hard to see other offers making sense.
http://nbaroundtable.wordpress.com/
Solid take..
…they really don’t have a lot to give up other than expirings and picks. It will be interesting to see if someone offers them a decent 1st rounder + an expiring.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I think that type of offer will make great sense for teams looking to make a playoff push …. but not below that level.
Teams ranging from San Antonio to Miami Heat – both of whom went after Mike hard last year while he was in Memphis. Teams that need that final piece to solidify their squad and playoff chances.
http://nbaroundtable.wordpress.com/
ITS OFFICIAL MAYN WE ARE NOT TRADING MILLER
well maybe not official. but der is literally a 0% chance dat we move him. I highly doubt we make any trade de way we playin righ now. u dont mess wit dis kinda chemistry, dat would be a FINANCIAL AND CULTURAL disaster. McHale dosent give up on his decisions (see: Randy Foye) and will undoubtedly give miller a full year at the very least in Minny mayn. Dis trade talk all eculation an IT ONT HAPPEN YESSSSSSSS!!
MAYN HOL UP!

by 




















