Ladies and Gents, the winner of the Shaddy/Foye Death Match!!!
OK, OK, I know that Foye was blocked on this dunk attempt, but the photo is too good to pass up.
Last night's game against the Hornets was almost like a contest against the Super Clippers. Do you remember when OBZs went out to LA and barely beat a scrappy squad without Baron Davis, Marcus Camby, and Chris Kaman? The Hornets showed up to the Target Center without an active Tyson Chandler, Hilton Armstrong, and David West. They were the Super Clips because Chris Paul > Eric Gordon and they shot the lights out from beyond the arc while the Clips couldn't hit the broad side of a barn.
Because their opponent was missing a fair chunk of its regular rotation, it wasn't one of those games you can point to as a "holy crap" moment against an upper-level NBA squad. However, they still did what they had to do and that by itself is a significant departure from what we Zombie fans have had to deal with for the past...oh, 4-5 years.
It almost wasn't the case. Perhaps knowing that they were short handed (especially in the front court) against an up-and-coming team on the road, the Hornets seemed perfectly content with going over the top of the Wolves defense; going 13-22 from beyond the arc and running up an impressive collection of long shots from just inside the line.
The problem early on was that Sean Marks was actually making shots and that the Hornets came out of the gate with a 70% eFG in the 1st quarter. At the half, NOLA still posted a 62% eFG. Out of the 17 total shots they missed from the field in the 1st 1/2, only 3 were collected by the Hornets while the rest went out of bounds or were rebounded by the Wolves. NOLA also went to the line 7 times while drawing only 4 fouls in the first 24 minutes of action. Quite simply, the Hornets didn't seem like they wanted to get their hands dirty and they seemed perfectly comfortable taking long shots, not fighting for rebounds, and avoiding mucking it up with Minny's considerable muckers.
Despite being 8-2 in January I still think fans are sleeping on what the Wolves have going on up here in the frozen tundra. At the 20 game mark (1 game after the end of Randy Wittman ball) the Wolves featured the league's 25th ranked offense with 102.8 points/100 possessions. A little over a month later, they now feature an offense that is putting up OE numbers between 112-116/game. Their season average, even after all the Witt-ball, is 106.2/100 possessions. They're outscoring opponents by 7.8 ppg in January. They're shooting significantly better, collecting a hefty chunk of their own misses while limiting their opponents from collecting theirs, and allowing their opponents to take fewer free throws. For opposing fans and teams, the Wolves you saw in December are no longer the folks you once knew and could depend on to roll over with only 1 quarter of effort required. Take a look at the game preview from Hornets 24/7:
PG: Sebastian Telfair v Chris Paul
Advantage: Hornets
If you can get past Telfair's 34% shooting, 1.02 points per shot, 2 rebounds per game, and pretty poor assist to turnover ratio en route to 4 assists per game - you have a pretty good player - who can't rebound, shoot, pass or . . who am I kidding? Have fun with Paul, Telfair.
SG: Randy Foye v Rasual Butler
Advantage: Even
After years of being injured or played out of position at point guard, Foye is finally being used at his natural shooting guard spot. His shooting percentages have climbed as a result, and in January he's cranking it at 50% from the floor for twenty points per game. He is becoming, essentially, Ben Gordon of the Bulls. Rasual's offense is as good, but I give him the edge on defense, evening this bracket.
While the author is clear that the Wolves must be taken seriously because they are playing better of late, he still sees the Wolves' starting back court with Witt-colored glasses. We all know that Sebastian Telfair is no Chris Paul but the player described above is just as foreign to us Bassy fans as is someone with the game of Mr. Paul. Back at the 20 game mark, SeBass was averaging 14 FT/FG with a 4.1 PPR and a 31.5 ast-r. Since the advent of Kevin McHale ball he has cut down the outside shots, increased his PER by nearly 2 points, increased his trips to the line to 24 FT/FG while retaining more than adequate PPR and ast-r numbers. He's an amazingly quick guard who isn't that bad of a defender and who has done the Wolves a world of good by being able to control the tempo and keep things brisk. Does he need to shoot better? Of course. Does he not grab a lot of rebounds? Sure. But he has considerably more worth than what the rest of the league and its fans may realize.
As for the Foye/Butler comparison...well, at the 20 game mark the Wolves' featured a -4.3 PER and -3.2 point deficit at the off guard spot. They now feature a +0.5 PER and +1.3 ppg at the position; a direct reflection of moving Foye off the ball and his superior play since Christmas. I know Rasul Butler and Randy Foye is no Rasul Butler. At the 20 game mark, Foye had a 11.7 PER and a 42.6% eFG. 20 games later he's at 14.6 with an eFG of 48.1%. In other words, over the last month or so he's well, well, well beyond Rasul Butler.
I don't point these things out to pick on the excellent blogger over at Hornets 24/7. I point them out to show how even though the Wolves are playing solid, confident ball and are 8-2 this month with across-the-board improvement, most fans and teams still seem to have an outdated view of what this club is bringing to the table on a night-in/night-out basis. Bassy is not a do-nothing push-over. Foye is...well, Ben Gordon with a bit more juice on situational defense (and a better handle) is much closer than Rasul Butler. Again, I'm not picking on anyone here; just pointing out that the Wolves...well, OK, I am picking on the Butler/Foye draw. Foye went for 24/5/8 with a +13 and no turnovers against Butler's 12/3/1 with a -15 and no turnovers. Foye is morphing into a poor-man's D-Wade (which was literally unthinkable earlier this year; it shocks even me; especially after watching the Wolves back court perform at historically awful levels early on) while Butler is Butler.
Getting back around to last night's tilt, it was a pretty good example of the Mike Miller "problem". On one hand the guy is in the middle of an epic cold spell. On the other hand, he really is pulling his weight on the boards while being the only other guy on the roster outside of Bassy and Foye who can be a play maker off the dribble. In fact, he's probably a better play maker than Foye. Last night Miller held his own off the bench with 9 rebounds, 5 assists and 12 points. He was 0-2 from 3 but he got his points by getting into the lane and creating havoc. For us fans, the big question about Miller and the Wolves is this: What if he gets his stroke back? What if the Wolves trot out Big Al Jefferson's nightly double-double down low, Randy Foye's dribble drive game with its lethal long range capability, and Miller's marksman shooting? If they're performing at an upper offensive level without Miller's outside shooting, what happens if and when the bombs start falling? With a team that has averaged a 114 OE in January, the immediate response to such a scenario is "holy crap". 3 capable offensive threats with guys like Kevin Love, Craig Smith, Ryan Gomes, Rodney Carney, and Bassy filling in the gaps....that sounds like the makings of something. And so goes the big question: Does the team wait on Miller or do they move him for an expiring deal and (hopefully) a younger player/pick?
As you can see in the Mike Miller Trade Watch FanPost, this is the hot issue with the squad right now. My 2 cents on the matter are that Miller's performance and value are two separate subjects. He could be performing at his career averages and that wouldn't change the amount of cap space he could move off the books should he be traded. The trade talk should be in the context of what his trading could bring to the table in terms of free agency and the trade market, not in the context of him not being able to hit shots like he has in the past. Let's end this with a few bullet points:
- Rodney Carney!!! At this point in the season I'm having a pretty hard time believing that Corey Brewer could bring anything extra to the table than what Carney is doing right now. The Carney v. Brewer talk is also a FanPost favorite. Personally, I'd like to see the Wolves use their picks to land a point, a big/athletic front court player and to use in a sign-and-trade for a starting level 3. I'd then like to see them bring back Carney on a cost-effective deal and let them loose together for 15-20 mpg. Jrue Holiday, Jerome Jordan, and Marvin Williams....come on down!!!
- J-Pete is on quite a run lately. The guy has always had the basketball smarts to make a fantastic, fantastic color commentary guy. The problem was that the homerism sometimes got in the way. I blame this on Hanny. Hanny is seemingly a very nice guy but he's an amazing homer. Amazing. That being said, Pete is dropping OE, DE, eFG, points/possession, and last night he even brought extending and ending possessions. I love listening to other color commentary crews on League Pass because I enjoy hearing what other folks have to say about the Wolves but I really think that Pete has upped his game this year and I no longer complain about having to listen to Hanny's homerism when League Pass goes with the home town crew. Actually, with Pooh Richardson in the building last night it was nice to hear Hanny talk about the team's past. Look at me. I gave Hanny a compliment.
- How about Big Al kicking it out to Foye for the dagger 3 near the end of the game. Big Al waited for the double team, calmly kicked it out, and then put his hands in the air in celebration as the ball was on its way to the hoop. Awesome. Big Al's reaction was every bit as excellent as the shot. Complete faith in Foye that he would make the shot. Jim Souhan has more on the shot (and Foye/Jefferson) here.
Finally, it was brought up in the comments last night that I should once and for all wrap up the Shaddy/Foye Death Match. It hadn't occurred to me that I hadn't done this yet. However, after checking the archive, it appears that we really haven't declared a winner. That being written, let's do it: Foye wins. He wins big. He wins more than big.
I'd like to hear about what y'all think about Foye going forward. Can he keep it up? Is this who he really is? Can you think of another player who has transformed himself to the effect of what Foye has done during a single season? What say you?
Until later.
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think this is who Foye is. I saw him do it right before he went down with the injury (summer league) and from that moment on I was a believer. It’s also flagrant how spot on Draftexpress was on his profile predicting the troubles if he was going to be forced to the one and the D-wade comparisons were also accurate.
The emergency of Foye is really a good thing for Brewer. I’m staying on his bandwagon for at least 2 more years after this season and am sticking to my view that we don’t need a starting caliber 3 because Corey is going to prove his worth there.
If he declares we absolutely need to trade away all our picks that we now have to get Rubio and then get Thabeet in a trade with Bulls exchanging Smith for Noah + Bulls pick.
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
the death match
Yes, Foye has won. You can see the increased confidence. I think fans are finally seeing what the front office saw when he was drafted. McHale is simply allowing him to play his game, not shoehorning him into a particular role. The same goes for other players like Love and Carney. Carney has found a very nice niche. The whole arena almost erupted BEFORE Carney threw down his breakaway dunk because they knew what was coming. A great NBA fan moment. Love didn’t have a particularly good game, but he, too is showing so much more comfort playing now. And Miller is showing what a smart player he is, too.
Several posters have pointed out who the Hornets were missing in their lineup. Still, you must play the team that shows up, whatever the composition. Paul is their key, regardless. Witness all the nice scoring opportunities that the wooden Sean Marks and Ryan Bowen got due to Paul. They ran three consecutive pick-&-roll plays with Bowen early in the second half that made the Wolves look bad. It was a great Wolves win & one that will hopefully help fans rediscover the Wolves.
Wittman
Foye has emerged because Wittman is gone. What an incredibly bad coach!
It certainly...
…doesn’t look like he’ll ever be at the head of a bench again.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
NOLA game
That was a helluva game last night. Miller’s ankles must be feeling better, because he was running around like the energizer bunny.
At some point...
The naysayers have to give the team’s current form props. I know people have been burned by the Wolves before, but this squad is soooo young and you can see the improvement via winning, which, in turn, leads to confidence. I completely agree that the players gave up on Wittman and he refused to adjust (“it’s not me, it’s them”), but I remember him saying, “We have to learn to win.” Hence all those 4th quarter collapses the last year or so. They’ve finally “learned to win” and it doesn’t matter who the opposition puts out there. How many games in the beg. of this season SHOULD the Wolves have won? Maybe 5? That OT loss to the Spurs comes to mind. Take those 5 out of the loss column and into the win and you’re close to .500.
And I agree with you, Wim, I think with Foye the injury really set him back and then it became a confidence issue. Take away the time he lost to injury and now he’s played 2 full seasons and this is the start of his 3rd, and we’re reaping the benefits of him being more seasoned.
With the way the Wolves are playing, I feel like they hold onto Miller because he’s not Shaddy, he’s doing other things out there and that instantly endears him to me. He’s not jacking up his shot until it falls, he’s driving and dishing. One of these nights that three he rimmed last night is going to fall and all of a sudden, it’ll click. Again, confidence. I sorta of think at this point the meal has already been cooked, so why not eat it? Obviously if there’s a one-sided deal out there to be had for the Wolves, then take it, but why not wait until around the draft to make a deal if you’re going to? Right now Miller is only improving his worth because he’s showing he’s a team guy and multi-faceted.
I'm still a little worried....
…that they’ll pull the football out from under me again. I’ve been conditioned to think this way as a Wolves fan I guess.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Well
Young teams that start winning will occasionally start falling back on bad habits. I fully expect to see a 20-30 point loss or two before the season is out, and I full expect the games in LA, Boston, and Cleveland to be no hope affairs. But we passed the Lucy stage the day Wittman was fired.
I hope so....
….this change was largely brought about by a change of attitude. That’s a pretty fragile line and we were talking about how they had one of the worst back courts in the league just over a month ago (they did).
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Well...
Young teams that start winning will occasionally start falling back on bad habits. I fully expect to see a 20-30 point loss or two before the season is out, and I full expect the games in LA, Boston, and Cleveland to be no hope affairs. But we passed the Lucy stage the day Wittman was fired.
Ouch, tough one for us to lose
Good recap. I’ve only seen maybe 5 or 6 Wolves’ games this year, but I’m gonna brashly give my take on Foye anyway : )
My feeling is that this is definitely who he is. In fact, statistically there are a lot of signs that this is simply a stepping stone to becoming an even better basketball player. The first year of his career, he was right around an average NBA player. However, he was kind of unfairly smashed because he didn’t have the type of year Brandon Roy had. Then when he only played 39 games last year, everyone forgot about him. Right now, the stat I find most impressive from Foye is his turnover rate. 12.4% from on off guard is frankly very, very good. It also looks sustainable if you consider his rates from the last two years were 13.9% and 16.4%. Not many young guards in the NBA can cut down their turnover rates that much, so early in their careers. It will be interesting to see if he can keep that up the rest of the year.
The stat that caused me some pause is the assist rate- pretty low for a combo guard. But then I saw you guys play last night and realized just how much Telfair handles it. Foye’s assist rates are artificially being somewhat lowered by the fact that Telfair is out there also. Which brings me to my main question: why exactly do Telfair and Foye play so well on the floor together? I agree with your assessment of Telfair in the post (better than people give him credit for), but he seems to make Foye significantly better and Foye returns the favor. +/- stats say that Foye plays his best basketball when Sebastien is out with him.
Extending that thought out a little bit, there might be somewhat of a Catch-22 here. When Kevin Ollie returns, Randy’s best chance to improve as a combo guard would be to have a Foye/Ollie backcourt and Telfair on the bench. This would allow him to test out his lowered turnover rates with the pressure of added possessions. I think he’s definitely found his comfort level in terms of possessions used (and his efficiency in those possessions). But he hasn’t yet reached the point where each marginal possession used offers a smaller ratio of output. An Ollie/Foye backcourt would allow Foye to improve his individual play, which could benefit the team in the long run. On the other hand, again, the Foye/Telfair backcourt has been incredibly efficient. Do you break that up in favor of Foye’s development? Or do you stick with this alignment, until potentially 2011 and see how it can develop?
Thanks for the take...
…much appreciated and I enjoy your site, especially the Stats 101/102 posts. We use them here when people have questions about starting out with beyond-the-boxscore stats. While the experiment didn’t exactly work out, Foye-at-point did give the guy a lot of time with his hands on the ball and he has a pretty nice handle for an off-guard. If he can continue to shoot 40% from beyond the arc (and he has done this throughout his career) his dribble-drive game will be all the better for it and thanks to the point experiment, he can spot an open man every now and then.
As for Ollie, check out his stats over at Knickerblogger. Before the injury he was performing as something of a Super Bassy: not shooting a lot, getting into the lane, and drawing fouls. Regardless of what happens with Ollie, most people around here expect their top draft pick to be a point and Foye and Bassy will have to adjust accordingly to whoever they bring in (hopefully Jrue Holiday). I think this current alignment lasts until their draft pick earns his keep.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
If Holiday...
…can continue to improve and his size is legit, he’d be tough to pass on. I’d like to see them get some size at the other guard position.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Ricky Rubio
is de clear choice. I fee like we get lucky in de lotto mayn. numba 3 wit RUBIO!
MAYN HOL UP!
My bet is that when Ollie comes back
They’re going to pretty much eliminate Foye’s PG duties (say 28 mpg Telfair, 20 Ollie), and next year have Foye do some PG while the new guy gets up to speed.
No More Ollie
I think Foye needs to keep his toe in the PG pool. He’s not big enough to be a 2 guard in the league.
by WinTheLottery on Jan 25, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions
Foye's development since Witt's departure
……. has been outstanding. Watching the clip last night on ESPN I was taken with the fact that on the three shot AL dished to him, the arms went up to celebrate with the ball in the air and Al’s back to the hoop. That speaks volumes regarding the trust key Wolves have in each other.
As far as this season goes, I think we only have what we thought we had at the start of the season – a 30 win squad. Nonetheless, the development is gratifying.
If Carney’s comparison is to Brewer, then Carney will likely be suiting up somewhere else next season if only because of the contract commitment, which is an enormous shame. I wonder if a better comparison is to McCants. Carney seems to me to be outside scoring dynamo that McCants can’t manage to be consistently.
Solid point..
….on Carney being Shaddy’s replacement, not Brewer’s. I guess it could work in that light. I just like the idea of having 2 relatively tall athletes out there running around at the 2 and 3 with the reserve unit.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I really hope Carney is back next year
I would love to see a 10 minute stretch of the game (when Foye is resting/playing PG) where Carney and Brewer are on the court together. Stick one of them on the opponent’s point guard and the other on their best wing and watch the madness.
Yep...
…it would be a nice thing to see off the bench with those two running around.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
with telfair
telfair, carney, Brewer , ?, ?
by WinTheLottery on Jan 25, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
That would work for 10 mpg
….as a change of pace off the bench. They’d need to have Jefferson in there with them and you really wouldn’t want to go with it for too long, but it would work in limited minutes. I think a Foye, Brewer, Carney, Love, Jefferson grouping would be interesting. Here’s hoping they can land a better 3 in the draft and make that a really interesting lineup.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
that is an interesting lineup...
especially on D – the length of that group on the perimeter could make for some real havoc and go some way toward negating, or at least neutralizing, the lack of a shotblocker at the back.
by plinytheelder on Jan 25, 2009 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
I think the idea is
that you can have and use Brewer and Carney effectively. This needn’t be an either/or situation.
I think your point...
…about him replacing McCants is the best way to state the case that they both could be here. It really depends on what they do in the draft and how much they can sign him for.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Hope I’m not reitering this too much but ….
As of now I really don’t see anyone in the draft that could be BETTER than Carney. Except MAYBE Earl Clark. What other good Mccants/Carney replacements are there? Keep in mind these guys were both lottery picks so Tyler Smith and others like that are not a valable answer, I need at least lottery picks, at the very least. Especially since this draft is just as weak as the 2006 draft where Carney was a lottery pick. Count the fact that Carney has an age closer to our average age than anyone who we can get in the draft … I just don’t see who could be better.
Free agency and trading, that’s a whole other thing!
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
by Wim (Belgium) on Jan 26, 2009 5:23 AM CST up reply actions
And on McCants....
His card is clearly stamped “done”. Is that 7 DNP-CD’s now?
If he can’t be moved by the trade deadline, what on earth are they going to do with him?
Let him live...
…with the Kardashians full time.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
In the interest of fairness...
I was (rightfully) hesitant to proclaim Mayo as a future superstar early on because of his absurd field goal percentage for long 2’s and 3 pointers. I think it’s only fair that we remind ourselves that while Foye is a completely changed player…he’s also shooting 49% from 3 point land in January. I have no doubt that 2 guard is his rightful spot, but you gotta wonder if the production we’re seeing now is his ceiling until he proves he can get to the line more consistently.
So to answer your question SnP about what the Wolves would look like with a sharp-shooting Mike Miller. My prediction would be that if Mike Miller ever finds his shooting stroke, then it would probably only amount to the negation of Randy Foye’s inevitable dropoff. With the end result being our current production…but considering what we’ve been through the last 20 years, that’s production we’ll take!
Yeah...
….he can’t maintain the 3 point shooting. I do hope that he’s developed enough of a dribble-drive game to make up for the downturn at the line. He can also rebound fairly well so that is an area he can make it up in. He has shot over 40% from 3 in the past so I’m hoping he can keep the percentage up above a normal player, but he’s shooting light’s out right now from beyond the arc and that part of it isn’t sustainable….and if it is, holy crap.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
You're far too pessimistic about Foye's longball
He’s not going to shoot 50% for the season, but he might have solid enough shooting to hit 40% for the season. Remember, season percentages are made of peaks and valleys. To use baseball as an example, Joe Mauer can hit .320 for a season, but that’s probably going to include a month of .400 and a month of .230.
I just hope he can...
..maintain his confidence through the inevitable downturn.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I think one thing working in his favour
is his stroke – his form is absolutely beautiful. To me he’s a natural for the longball.
by plinytheelder on Jan 25, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
SWEET!!!!
Foye has officially made McCants his little BIOTCH!!!!!! McCants is such a waste of skin….
i tell U what mayn...
RM has a boatload of talent and is wasting it. He must have some disorder that forces him to be a complete idiot. That being said, since McHale became coach, RM has not gotten zero burn. Maybe he would surprise us all if given the chance. Ain’t gonna happen with the big Frankenstein as coach. You Hol’n up what I’m sayin Mayn???
Not gloating here...
But dang, right around the first of the year I wrote a lengthy post in defensive of Foye and he goes on an absolute tear. He’s been playing great as of late, but i’m still of the mind set that Foye still hasn’t played enough games where we can make a declarative judgement about Randy Foye. Now if Foye puts together another 40 games like he’s played this past January, we’re going to have a good idea about what kind of player we have.
A side note, i’ve been reading the draft observations posted on this blog; Harden over Griffin? If that happens, the entire front office should be sacked. I’m of the opinion that a team’s best player can’t be its worst defender and he absolutely as to be able to make the players around him better. Moreover, he can’t be a poor leader. I haven’t seen anything from Jefferson that would indicate that he’s the type of cornerstone player that can lead a team to a title. Now if the Wolves have a shot at Griffin, who combines Boozer like strength with Stoudamire explosiveness, they’d be crazy to pass on him. Furthermore, Griffin always runs to get back on defense and plays the game with a childlike enthusiasm. If we can get Griffin we’d be able to move Jefferson and he’d command a nice ransom on the trade market. A young 22 and 11 guy would surely net some nice players and draft picks. We’d likely be able to get a shot blocking center to play alongside Griffin, allowing Love to come off the bench and be a perennial sixth man of the year candidate.
Imagine moving Jefferson and Shaddy to the Clippers in return for the first round pick we owe them, Chris Kaman(not that he’s a stellar post defender, but he brings SIZE) , DeAndre Jordan, and Al Thornton. We could look to the free agent market to pick up a point guard. Hell, maybe we get luck in the 2010 lottery and get John Wall. (Wall, in my opinion, is probably the best point guard on the planet not playing in the NBA. He’s going to be in the Derrick Rose/Chris Paul model of franchise transforming point guards)
And I still love the idea using one of our later 2009 first rounders on Duke’s Gerald Henderson an athletic guard, who is a hound on defense, a decent shooter, and an excellent finisher. He’s the type of young player a winning team wants on its bench.
Next year we could be looking at…
Kaman/Jordon
Griffin/Love
Carney/Brewer
Foye/Henderson
Telfair/?
Through Wall into the mix you’ve got a young athletic team that can shoot, pass, and defend.
If the Wolves somehow land Griffin, they should just run a front court of Jefferson/Love/Griffin and just murder their opponents in the high and low post.
Just to be clear...
….I have a caveat for Griffin:
I still have Harden at the top of the list because I believe he offers exactly the type of impact in the back court as Griffin does in the front court. Obviously, if the Wolves have the 1st pick they have to consider trade value (esp with Griffin and 2 other PFs on the roster), but Harden should be at the top of his list as he is clearly the best guard in the draft (again, I don’t know how to rank internationals so you need to account for Rubio and Jennings).
If they land the #1 pick their first call should be to OKC. Westbrook for Griffin. I can’t think of a better PG mate for Foye than Westbrook. Although, it would be kind of intriguing to see Griffin, Love, and Jefferson on the same team. The rebounding would be insane.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
The rebounding would be insane...
It would also be insane to keep Jefferson. He’s not the cornerstone of a contending team. Ultimately isn’t that what the team should be trying to build, a team that can contend for titles? A title team’s best player can’t be a disastrous defensive player. Moreover, the best player on a contending team needs to be a leader and be able to make his teammates better players; Big Al is neither. We shouldn’t settle for mediocrity. If we’ve got a shot at Griffin… why not move Big Al for Westbrook and a draft pick? (maybe a three way deal so the contracts can match up?)
According to ESPN.com’s lotto generator, if the season ended today the Wolves would have a 4.3% chance of winning the top pick (i.e., Blake Griffen). Granted we have a long way to go (too long if you ask me), and they could easily move one way or the other in the standings, but in all likelihood, such a dramatic facelift won’t be needed.
But I agree that if Fortune smiles upon them this summer, you take Griffen and sort out the messy details later…

by 















