Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Shrink's Mailbag

  Money Talks  with shrink

First, would Rudy Gay's qualifying offer carry over to us if we were to trade for him midseason?

Second, if so, would that technically count him as a member of our team over the summer, meaning we could use our cap space to sign a free agent, THEN sign Gay afterwords because we can go over the salary cap to resign our own players?

Brian

Hey Brian!  I share your interest in Rudy Gay, particularly after he and Memphis were unable to come to an agreement on a contract extension a few weeks ago.  While I am concerned about a number of his statistics, I suspect his situation in Memphis leaves him unhappy and artificially lowers his production.  If he reaches free agency, these concerns may push other teams to gamble longterm money on more reliable free agents ahead of Gay, and I suspect that a lot of the NBA's cap space will be gone by the time Gay gets a contract.  With less buyers, I think his final contract may be less than we expect, and his physical tools give him the uncommon opportunity to sign a fairly large free agent deal, and still get upside on that money.  There are a lot of scenarios for Rudy Gay, and he's an interesting player to follow.

Star-divide

In 2010, Rudy Gay is still a restricted free agent on his rookie scale contract, and Memphis' inability to sign him to an extension does not mean that they lose their ability to make him a qualifying offer of $4,422,784 next summer, which they will.  If he's traded to us, we retain that right as well. 

Also, whoever has him will have the right to match offers from other teams.  In my view, if things don't improve with the relationship between OJ Mayo and Rudy Gay, and Gay and the rest of the team, small-market Memphis would be unlikely to use their right to match an expensive offer.  Next season they will be paying Zach Randolph and Marko Jaric a combined $25 million, and they would struggle to pay for Gay's deal until 2011.  This may encourage them to try to trade Rudy Gay, rather than lose him for nothing.

If Minnesota acquires Rudy Gay, he will indeed carry a cap hold for 2010.  Here's the skinny:

For first rounders like Gay, if the player's salary from last year is greater than the average salary of all the league’s players, his cap hold is 2.5 times his salary. If his salary is less than the average league salary, then his hold is 3 times his salary.

For non-first round free agents, they have a cap hold equivalent to 1.5 times their last years salary if that salary is above the league average and 2 times their last year's salary if its below.

Finally, the hold cannot be larger than the player’s maximum first-year salary on their new contract.  For example, 3x the #1 pick's last year would be greater than a max deal.

For Rudy Gay, his  will likely be less than the average salary, which should come in near $5 mil.  As a first rounder, his cap hold would be $3,280,997 x 3.0 = $9,842,991.

Cap holds are in place at the beginning of free agency, and are designed specifically to prevent teams from creating artificial cap space by delaying contracts to players they have the rights to.  If we traded for Gay before the deadline, his cap hold would prevent us from using our cap space elsewhere unless he was dealt to another team.  Notice that Randy Foye would have put us in the same situation if he had not been traded.

Got Questions?  EMail shrink at nba_economist@yahoo.com and you may find yourself in a future mailbag!

0 recs  |  Comment 22 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

so explain this so even us who don't understand the CBA can get this

If we were to trade for Rudy Gay…We would not be able to use the other money we have coming off the books to sign other free agents?

by TonyO on Nov 19, 2009 2:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Or at least we can't

use the amount that his hold is. Anything in excess of that up to the salary cap is fair game. So basically it would be Gay and filler in the offseason.

by TheEvilProfessor on Nov 19, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It seems to me

that the cap hold is a fairly stupid rule. Why should Rudy Gay count as an 11 million dollar player when he’s worth 4 million? I don’t understand the logic behind that at all.

by TimAllen on Nov 19, 2009 3:11 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The $4 mil is just the opening offer

Let me use Portland as an example.

If Brandon Roy hadn’t signed an extension, his qualifying offer would still be around $4 mil because he’s still on rookie scale, but we all know he’s worth more than that,. However, the NBA doesn’t know how much, so they err on the side of caution.

Without the 3x or 2.5x rule, POR would have a big advantage. If Roy’s cap hold was only $4 mil, perhaps they’d have the cap space to grab a max deal player like LeBron for $16 mil, then the next day, replace their $4 mil cap hold with Roy for a $13 mil contract.

Since I mentioned Roy, let me talk about Foye. Suppose we still had him, and he had the same $4 mil qo, $11 mil cap hold. If we wanted to give him a new contract starting at $5 mil, we’d want to do that immediately, replace his cap hold with a true salary, and reclaim the real cap space.

Rudy Gay is a question mark. I personally don’t think he’s going to get $11 mil in the 2010 economy unless things change drasticly for Gay or for the NBA market. Trading for him before the deadline would reduce our flexibility with other free agents and may hurt our 2010 pick, but it would give us a preview of how he’d look on the team before committing longterm money, and it would also give us the ability to match a contract if he accepted a low offer.

by shrink on Nov 19, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If the “preview” of Gay didn’t go well, couldn’t we renounce his rights on Day 1 of free agency, which would eliminate the problem of reduced flexibility in free agency next year? Which would make the only real downside to a mid-season trade the potential hurting of our draft pick (which is not something to consider when making personnel decisions, if you ask me)?

by LoveTo on Nov 19, 2009 9:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus whatever assets we’d have to give up for him in trade.

by shrink on Nov 19, 2009 10:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The reason for the rule is to avoid cap cicumvention

It applies to all players—not just guys with a qualifying offer, and if memory serves was the result of a sleight of hand Pat Riley attempted with the Heat years ago. Juwon Howard had played the best basketball he ever would play, conveniently for about 2 months before he became a free agent. He was with Washington at the time. The Heat wanted to sign him to a massive contract, and had Zo Mourning coming off a contract themselves, but obviously wanted to keep him.

So they signed Howard first, with the “cap space” created by Mourning’s ending contract, THEN they used their Bird rights to resign Mourning over the cap. The league voided the Howard deal as an attempted circumvention, and to avoid this sort of thing in the future, they came up with the system of cap holds.

by Eric in Madison on Nov 19, 2009 3:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the replies, shrink and Eric

That actually does make more sense now.

by TimAllen on Nov 19, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for writing

One of the reasons I wanted to post here was to explain things like this, so let me simplify:

FREE AGENCY:

1. Every team can offer MLE deals to free agents, which should be about $5 mil next year.

2. If your team’s total payroll is under the salary cap (which may be around $52 mil), you can offer up to that amount under the cap. ( If we’re $10 mil under the cap, we can offer $10 mil, while most teams could only offer $5). No team can exceed a max deal.

3. MIN wants to clear as much payroll as possible for next season, to be able to offer bigger deals, or trade the cap space.

CAP HOLDS

4. To prevent teams from cheating the system on “when” they are under the salary cap, the NBA applies “cap holds” to players that a team has the rights to sign later.

5. If we owned Rudy Gay in 2009-10, we’d have his rights in 2010-11, so we’d carry a cap hold for him.

Example:

Suppose MIN’s Total salary with 8 players was $37 mil, which means they would have $15 mil of “cap space” under the $52 salary cap. Without Gay on the roster, we could offer $15 mil to a promising free agent.. With Gay on the roster, his $11 mil cap hold would only leave us $4 mil to offer a free agent. The cap hold only disappears if we either sign Gay to a real contract (which may be lower or higher), or move his rights to another team.

by shrink on Nov 19, 2009 3:17 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

or renounce his rights, making him a UFA.

by John Doe on Nov 19, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Edit

Strangely, I recited the rules, then failed to apply them correctly.

I’ve edited the post to reflect Gay’s true cap hold, $9,842,991

by shrink on Nov 19, 2009 3:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Big Al - Gay - Love - Sessions

Don’t forget the big guy.

by Menyun on Nov 20, 2009 7:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If only we could afford to add both Gay and Johnson

Big Al – Gay – Johnson – Love – Sessions.

Alright, it’s a reach, but it’s making me smile.

by John Doe on Nov 20, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Your Gay Johnson reach is making you smile? That’s just too good man.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Nov 20, 2009 3:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If the qualifying offer transfers to us, then I'm all for trading for Gay ASAP

Say what you want about his shortcomings….he’s exponentially better than anyone we have on the wings right now.

We can get him right now, test drive him for the season, and win a lot more games than we’re projected to right now. If we like him, we guarantee ourselves the ability to retain him. If we don’t like him, we won’t waste the summer chasing him and won’t have to deal with a disappointment next year.

by Oceanary on Nov 19, 2009 7:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

How much?

How much do you give up to have the right to match an overpriced deal on Gay? After NY strikes out on LeBron and the rest, who do you think they’re going after? And, what will Memphis accept in trade?

by Blond Ricky on Nov 20, 2009 6:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What indeed...

I’d start with trying to get a steal. Ryan Gomes and our second or third draft pick maybe (that’d save us having a cap hold because of the rookie contract). Then go from there.

It’s hard to know what the Grizz would want. Are they looking of requal value on his contract or his talent? No one really knows.

by Oceanary on Nov 20, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s hard to know what the Grizz would want .. indeed

That’s one franchise I can’t figure out. Were they so desperate for ticket sales/wins that they were willing to ignore their rebuild, endangering developing young talent with guys like Zach Randolph, Allen Iverson, and Jamaal Tinsley?

Maybe this is a team that wants to bring in Mark Blount, not for financial reasons, but for his stabilizing clubhouse presence?

Love the updates – nice job Oceanary

by shrink on Nov 21, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We could trade Rudy ourselves later.

One point that’s been left out in all this discussion of cap space is that Rudy is an asset. If we traded for him at the deadline, nothing prevents us from trading him again this summer.

A sign-and-trade limits us if we want to take back raw cap space, because there will be few buyers. However, while there’s risk, he could be a value play. I think its very possible his trade value would rise if he moved from MEM to MIN.

by shrink on Nov 20, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I want to know...

It is not even Thanksgiving yet and all of this speculation is killing me. I know a lot will change between now and July but I really wish Kahn would give us a hint to who he is going to pursue. Of course in the end there is so much more involved in the decision process than just talent alone.

by Far East on Nov 20, 2009 7:19 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Comparison of PER's for draftees for 2010 and 2009 (top 25 for each yr)
Small
Wolves Draft History: Stats people please help?
Small
An Attempt to Clarify the Argument
Small
Are argument to get Rubio here next season! the new CBA could reduce salaries and guaranteed money for rookies.
3358_small
Vote Corey over MJ NOW!!!!
Wolfen_small
The Point Guard Conundrum
Dsc00186_small
Kahn: Kevin Martin NOT coming to Wolves, in so many words!
Wolveslogo_small
Prowling the NBA: Feb 7 - BOOM SHAKALAKA
Small
Rookie Comparison
Small
I've got to know

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!

    Misc:

     

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop