9 months ago
Stop-n-Pop
21 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I'm confused by the reasoning here
Is it just to show how big of a mockery the selection process is?
New Process
Let the sports writers pick the starting 5. The writers are watching the stars night in and night out. I guarantee this is the way to get the most justice out of the starting lineups.
Let the coaches select 5 players. Coaches are most likely to vote based on slightly different criteria than the writers or fans. I’ll call this the Al Jefferson vote. Last year any coach in the league who had faced both Shaq and Al know that Jefferson was having a break-out season, while Shaq was playing mediocre, at best.
Let the fans pick the last 5. That way if people are so desperate to see their favorite player, that player will get a few minutes here and there.
Voting from the writers would conclude a month before the the All Star break. Coaches would have two days after the returns from the writers to pick the next available 5 players. These processes would not take as long as the normal voting process, because we’re talking about 30 writers and 30 coaches. Lastly, the fans would have about two weeks to vote, which doesn’t seem like much, but here’s why:
1.) Fans would be forced to actually wait almost half the season before submitting a vote.
2.) The smaller time frame would make it more likely that less fair-weather fans would participate in the voting, thus hopefully eliminating the likes of this years’ TMac votes.
I would like to officially submit this to the league. David Stern, it’s your move.
Yuk
The writers? Yikes. Take a look at some of the baseball awards votes over the past years. They get it wrong plenty.
Second, let’s consider the question of who should be in the all star game. Is it for guys who have a great 2 months at the beginning of the year, or should previous performance be taken into account? I don’t think McGrady should be an all-star, but I’m a believer that guys who are on a small sample size run shouldn’t necessarily get in either.
Finally, presumably the game exists to entice fans. Why disenfranchise them in the way you suggest?
I’m not particularly interested in the all-star game, but I don’t support your system.
by Eric in Madison on Dec 11, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
This is the successful version of trying to send ’Toine to the ’08 All-Star Game. I really wanted that to happen.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Dec 11, 2009 10:20 AM CST reply actions
I know I'm in the minority
but I really couldn’t care less about McGrady getting in. It’s the All Star Game, it’s never been the guys who had the best couple of months leading up to the game. Not in my lifetime. If people want to see him, fine. It’s an exhibition game, and a bunch of guys who deserve to be rewarded will get in will the coach’s selections. Also, it’s kinda funny.
I don't care if he does or not..
….I’m in the funny camp. Plus, I’m hoping it inspires him to get “Made in China” tattooed somewhere on his body.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
Made in China?
Because of his shoddy construction that’s prone to breaking down, or because Yao Ming fans are propelling him into the All Star Game?
I don't care what anybody says
Sanjaya’s PonyHawk was a great look. I mean, it was a contest to find a new pop star and people are gonna make fun of the kid for wearing his hair all crazy? Busting out crazy fashions and hairdos is what being a pop star is all about.
by Princely Frank on Dec 11, 2009 12:21 PM CST reply actions
I guy in the picture is hilarious. I don’t think anyone would try that even if it’s the Eurosong contest .. and we’ve seen a LOT there…
from
[img]http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/488/nicolehugogifcv9.gif[/img]
up to
[img]http://tiny.abstractdynamics.org/archives/lordi.jpg[/img]
Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009
Eurovision rules
One of my favorite youtube hobbies. I think Sanjaya would fit in quite nicely, personally.
How great would it be...
IF McGrady made his season debut during the All-Star Game. It’s becoming pretty evident that Houston doesn’t want to play him, but it sounds like he may be healthy enough to play now. That would be pretty interesting if it did happen.
It'll be especially interesting if he actually plays well.
In a way, it would really stick it Rocket management by showing them up. But at the same time, they’d love it because it might raise his trade value from whatever low point it’s currently at.
by Princely Frank on Dec 11, 2009 6:44 PM CST up reply actions
I think it's pretty funny...
…that it also begs the question of how much of a diseased player he must be for Houston to pay him $20 mil just to stay away from the club. That’s Starbury level disease.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
I don't really see him as much a team cancer
Especially not on the level of Starbury. I see him as an on-court problem, likely in the same way that Q-Rich would have been for us but to a greater degree. As presently constructed on the court, the Rockets don’t have use for a former All-NBA talent (whom still thinks he has that in him) dragging his one good leg up the floor up until the point where his back begins to spasm. They’re all about grit and team play and defense, things he can’ do much of, especially at this point in his career.
Just as an asset, too, I can see why they’re keeping him away. What good does he do them returning back from injuries when he says he’s ready and their doctor’s don’t? I don’t blame them for protecting their 20 million dollar expiring contract for trade purposes. I don’t think much more would be made of this if T-Mac wasn’t making so much noise about wanting to return before the doctors said he was ready.

You were a daydreamer, a sass-mouth, and, not infrequently, a bit of a gigglepuss. Somehow I doubt twenty years of amphetamines and failure have done anything to improve that.
by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Dec 12, 2009 12:34 PM CST reply actions














