Al Jefferson for Noah and Deng?
The Wolves need a small forward/wing who can both defend and score. Options discussed included adding Rudy Gay via trade or free agency, drafting Evan Turner, or hanging on until the trade deadline/offseason to see if a starter cn be had from teams cutting salary or in need of a point guard.
I'd like to revisit a potential trade that was kicked around last year: Al Jeff for Luol Deng and Joakim Noah.
The Bulls are thiiiissss close to dumping Vinny Del Negro. But the problem with that is they also envision themselves as big potential players in the Free Agent Frenzy next summer. Trying to woo certain stars next summer will be more difficult if the coaching position is up in the air. Plus, Derrick Rose is telling the team that Del Negro has made him a better player, and apparently wants to keep VDN around.
Adding AlJeff would improve their low-post scoring, might open up the perimeter for Hinrich and Salmons, and give the less-offensively-minded-but more-physical 3-4s (Gibson, Johnson, Ty Thomas) more room to move. The Bulls would also still have plenty of cap room left over to dangle in front of DWade.
For the Wolves, Deng is just a year older than Gay, a better player, and makes less than AlJeff (and about what Gay thinks he should be paid). Noah is a better defender than AlJeff, still signed for $2m or so into next year, and could provide some comfort for the enigma that is Corey Brewer. Yes, the Wolves would have to pay to keep Noah after 2010, but they should still have cap and money left over to pay a 2-guard in a trade or free agency pick up.
This is a decent young (and more balanced) roster:
Sessions/Flynn
Brewer/Ellington
Deng/Gomes/Brewer
Love/Gomes
Noah/Hollins/Jawai
And still leaves lots of room to add an FA at the 2, and/or room for draft picks to play at the 3-4-5.
The questions:
- Would it improve the Wolves?
- Would the Bulls go for it?
- Is it a fair enough deal for the Wolves?
- If not, what pieces can the Wolves/Bulls add into the trade that would still work, but make it more palatable to both teams?
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I do not like this trade.
I know people might argue with me, but I just think that Al Jefferson is going to be much better than either of these players right now and in the future. Besides that, Luol’s 6-year, $71 million deal isn’t worth taking. Big Al’s actually worth it.
I justhate Joakim Noah, I have no idea why, but I do and I wouldn’t want him to play on our team and it would be a huge step down from Al Jefferson at Center.
Would rather have a Big Al for Dalembert, Young base deal.
Or Biedrins and Azubuike, or Kaman and Thornton (very unlikely), or Hawes and Kevin Martin (once again, unlikely), or Boozer and Brewer base-deals.
oooo
Kaman and Love playing 4 and 5, I’m blinded! White dudes everywhere!
I like it though, but it is unlikely. Doesn’t look like Kaman’s going anywhere. Not sure I like Bledrins/Azubuike unless that’s a lot of cash off the cap, which I doubt. Dalembert and Young would be amazing I think. Those guys would fit pretty well. Defensive help from Dalembert would be huge and both of them can move, fitting the up tempo stuff.
Still at this point, the wolves are not gunna trade Al Jefferson. They can’t trade away the only real value they got from the KG trade (unless you count Ryan Gomes WHICH YOU SHOULDN’T). I think we build around Big Al and K-Love. But it would be nice to have a center that could play some D-fence on the Pau Gasol’s of the league, but that’ll come. I’m patient. Ryan Hollins has super potential. . .
That’s all I got. . .
by 123farve567-612 on Dec 31, 2009 1:28 AM CST up reply actions
You would think they would be better off
trying to sign Brendan Haywood as a defensive rotation big instead. He is a FA this offseason and we can offer him a decent deal and then use the draft to stock our wings with talent.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 31, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
Interesting tidbit
he was actually positive in about 25mpg in the last two games in +/- when the rest of the team was negative (or most of the team at least).
he has the best +/-
on that team. I want to say that when arenas is on the floor without Foye they are +3, with Foye and its like -13. They found out that when Foye is with Haywood, they are like +8 or something. My take was that Foye can’t stay in front of his man and needs a shotblocker behind him to cover that up. Kind of sounds like the rotation C that the wolves could really use. After the other teams sign up the top FA, the wolves may have the most space to offer him a decent contract.
by TheEvilProfessor on Jan 2, 2010 10:07 AM CST up reply actions
Seems like a guy
who really enjoys winning though. I bet if he goes to a losing team it will be staying with Washington. I’d definitely love to have him though. He would compliment Love perfectly and Jefferson slightly less so, but still well. I’m going to stop typing now so I don’t salivate all over my keyboard though.
I liked the question sequence at the end
I would have to say:
1. Yes it would, drastically
2. Hihgly doubt it
3. Wolves would be running away with it in this deal. Especially with how well Deng and Noah have played this year.
4. I would assume we would have to add a young piece like Ellington or take back a contract for an expiring. I have a feeling Salmons for Cardinal might push them over the top. They get rid of a year of contract for a guy they probably really won’t want a year from now anyways. The only reason I think they would do this as is is because they save almost $1M for next years signings and they get rid of Deng’s slightly longer deal and don’t have to worry about resigning Noah (which I’m sure is a problem they don’t mind though).
Side notes:
Our defense would drastically improve
We would have a more dependable 3. We would have a defensive minded 5, who can still do decently on offense.
Brewer, as you mentioned, might become a little more comfortable.
We would lose a lot of post scoring… so Favors might become a top target in the draft
Love might not be happy? I don’t know how he feels about Jefferson, but I don’t know if he has liked too many of Kahn’s massive roster turnover moves so far.
I should have asked you to write the post instead
Well said across the board. Low post scoring would suddenly be an issue, but you’re right—Favors moves to the top of the draft wish list if this move is made. I don’t think Kevin Love is the kind of guy to whine. And as you mentioned, the defensive burden would be lifted off of Love’s shoulders, both down low and on the perimeter. Which may then free Love up for more scoring opportunities that disappear (for better or worse) once AlJeff gets the ball.
Good points
also, you just made me think of how well Brewer might look in a system that can play some D. It’s not like Deng is a D-Allstar, but he is no scrub. Noah can definitely hold his own. Love can hold his own (for the most part) and Flynn…well… we could do worse. Brewer might suddenly start to look like he belongs in the NBA. If we got Salmons, he would give us some added scoring (granted he isn’t very efficient and seems like he needs a nice kick in the pants to learn to be) and wouldn’t hinder us past 2011 (and would be a nice asset this offseason or next trade deadline). I like the post and there are definitely some opportunities to be had. I think we need more trade posts after Just A Fan gave us that nice insight that we might be looking to people less expected. Bosh and Wade are both “unhappy” with the current situations. And not that we would be a primary destination for Wade, but Bosh might not be too upset about being here. He’s cold as it is and we have a nice future with some cap room. I doubt this happens, but everything has to be explored when Kahn is steering the ship.
Unless Wade complains enough
and we can send Big Al plus expirings to Toronto for Bosh and Wade we can get for expirings and maybe this years picks and Sessions (since they lack a great starting PG).
Haha, pipe dream.
Great Question
This is a tough one.
On one hand, Noah + Deng > Al Jeff. However, Big Al is significantly better than either one of these guys. Furthermore, Al could be an All-Star for years to come and neither of these guys will be. NBA championships are typically built around 2 All-Stars and while I’m a big KLove fan I’m not sure he is one. So a starting frontcourt of Noah, Love and Deng is very solid, but not special. I also think Gay (who we may or may not get) is a future All-Star.
Also, Deng’s contract is pretty onerous and would eventually re-signing Noah and Love leave us the cap room for a long term deal for an All-Star level SG? I think that level of SG is necessary if we envision an NBA championship run. A starting line-up of Noah, Love, Deng, a solid, but not special SG, and Flynn/Sessions or Rubio is getting to the playoffs, but not the finals.
I don’t think adding Noah just for Brewer’s sake makes much sense. Remember his best friend from those Florida teams, Chris Richard, was here and it didn’t help.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Dec 12, 2009 12:22 PM CST reply actions
That said...
I voted for the trade b/c my sense is we’ll eventually have to make a Big Al vs KLove decision and I doubt we’d ever get more than Noah & Deng.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Dec 12, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions
Good point
but you also have to think a) what can these guys do with a pass-first PG instead of a scoring PG (Rubio v Rose) b) Detroit didn’t have a superstar, they just had good defense and team chemistry and everyone did their part and c) Assets are assets are assets. If we are willing to trade Al Jefferson for these guys, what else are teams willing to trade for them? Just because we trade for them doesn’t mean we have to keep them for more than a year.
Also, what types of 3team deals could we pull off to avoid Deng’s 6 years?
True, but
Detroit is the only team in almost 30 years to win a championship that didn’t have 2 All-Stars on their team.
Again, I’d probably do this trade and address SG via draft (Evan Turner, Xavier Henry) or trade (Rubio’s rights plus XXX for Iguodala or straight-up for Mayo).
It is amazing how many assets we have (3 upcoming picks, Rubio’s rights, probably trading Big Al or Love, and solid role players Gomes, Sessions etc).
by TWolvesFanInLA on Dec 12, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions
BTW, not that I think we could get Iguodala for Rubio when Sixers probably think Jru Holiday could be their PG of future…just dreaming.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Dec 12, 2009 1:16 PM CST up reply actions
Wouldn't be a fan
of Rubio for Mayo.
And yes, teams usually do have multiple allstars if they hope to win it all. But think of how many teams have 2 allstars and don’t win every single year. I don’t know the answer to that, but the formula is something like this:
if X = number of teams with 2+ allstars
Y = X-1
Now, how many teams are built like the Pistons of the early 2000s? I’m really drawing a blank. And how many teams with 2+ allstars did the Pistons beat on their way? So as a percentage, the Pistons definitely chose the right model to follow.
I was going to ask you to help me out to compare our current roster to the Pistons to see what we need, but I think I am just gonna go make a new post on that. I’d love the input!
I would do this in a heartbeat
But I doubt that Chicago would. It’s a lot for them to give up. I think the Wolves would have to be willing to take Hinrich back for expirings in order for them to do this. That’s something I don’t think I could stomach.
by Eric in Madison on Dec 12, 2009 12:39 PM CST reply actions
You have to think though
after this year, the teams who lost out on their big signings (cough NY cough cough) will be looking to add some players and we will have the assets to trade them. Heinrich is still an asset to a good team. So is Deng if we decide not to keep him (if we are worried about his long-term contract). We could make Deng look good in our system for a couple months and then ship him off during the offseason, hopefully before he gets hurt. Or use him for a sign and trade. There are options out there, we just have to guage who would be willing to take those contracts (which really aren’t terrible contracts by any means, yet).
Yeah, thats about right
I imagine any deal like this might involve taking Tyrus Thomas off the Bulls hands. Seems he may have run his race as a Bull.
Judd: "...I've since watched some Steven Seagal movies and I realise that pressure points are no laughing matter.".
No thanks
Mainly because of Deng’s contract relative to his ability. I think Noah would be a great fit, though. I also agree that the original deal might not be something the Bulls would do (unless they think they can get Bosh next summer to replace Noah and want to move Deng’s deal).
by pagingstanleyroberts on Dec 12, 2009 1:59 PM CST reply actions
I haven't heard anything about this
Any links for us?
From SBNation:
His offensive repertoire is limited, including his free-throw shooting. Sometimes his intensity overflows into cockiness.
I like the idea, but hate the idea of having Joakim and his bad attitude.
Sounds like the type of guy
who would benefit from having Shaq scream into his face. Or maybe Bill Laimbeer and Kurt Rambis?
Deng is just so uninspiring
I mean I guess he’s an above average SF. That’s what everyone says. But what does he really give you? 18 points per game on a passable true shooting percentage. some rebounds, and sound defense. That’s all great, but it’s just so boring. He can’t shoot threes. He doesn’t force a lot of turnovers. He’s not a freak athlete. He doesn’t make plays for others.
This trade is stellar value, and I’d almost reject it anyway just because it’s so soul crushing. Where’s the source of upside with Deng and Noah? Both appear to have maxed out their abilities. At least with Al we can dream about what he’ll become when he heals, surrounded by shooters, if he can pass better, etc, etc.
Hodeonasec, here
First, props for copping to the notion that Deng isn’t flashy, and that that’s one of the reasons you don’t like him (I’d guess that attribute is one that Glen Taylor, POBO, and any body else who lived through the J.R. Rider Experience would consider a “positive,” but I’m not about to argue that people in say, Atlanta circle their schedules when Luol Deng’s coming to town).
Plus, although Deng doesn’t shoot a lot of threes (that used to be Ben Gordon’s job), he is hitting at about a 40% clip over the last three years.
But who the hell gets excited about Al Jefferson, much less the upside of Al Jefferson? He’s played 10,000 NBA minutes—we know who and what he is. He doesn’t pass or defend well. Yes, he can create his own shot and rebound. And now he’s been slowed by an injury from which he may or may not completely recover before old age sets in.
Some arguments in your favor: Noah turns 25 in 2 months. He’s not a fresh young kid any more. Deng’s contract is a year longer than Al’s. Also, my hope is that this trade would make both teams better, but could just make them both bad in a new and different way. So beyond your gut reaction to disliking the trade, the oncourt results could be equally disappointing.
As a wolves fan, I would make this trade. Taking back Deng’s contract is not awesome, but, on the whole, I think it makes our team better. I have never been a huge fan of Jefferson’s game. It seems to me that his skillset is similar to Zach Randolph’s, without the outside shooting: a ball-dominant post that puts up numbers on a bad team. And how many playoff series have his teams won?
That being said, I would not rush to trade him as many others seem intent on in boards here and elsewhere. Right now, Jefferson is the best player on our team, the one player that other teams have to account for and that keeps us in games.
There have been quite a few trades posted that I wouldn’t want to do, but this one I would, as it gives us a long, defensive-minded center that Hollins may not become, clears up some of the logjam at the 4 without too significant of a downgrade from Jeff to Love, and gives us an above average scorer at the 3 who can also defend. In this sense, the wolves may be able to replicate the success had by the pistons, though without significant upgrades at the 2 and off the bench I don’t know that this team would become a true contender and have the ceiling of those pistons teams. But are we going to become a contender with holes at the 3 and 5 with a post player who demands the ball, stifles the flow of the offense and doesn’t play defense anyway?
What's Noah's offensive game like? Can he function in the post at all?
If Noah is passable offensively in the paint, then I think I do this trade. Having two scrappers and dirty-work guys who can score at reasonable levels as your big men works, if you have perimeter scorers.
I think we've seen the past two games that Love can't carry the scoring load for us in the post
So unless we’re getting a player who can at least partially make up for Al’s post scoring back, we don’t trade him.
good point...
If Al is our power forward of the future, you can have a Noah or Tyson Chandler type as your center. Protect the rim, rebound, block shots. Doesn’t need to be a threat to score on post as much.
While Love spreads the floor better and passes significantly better, we might need a center that can do it all (defensive skills above) and a low post scorer. Not many of these guys in the league (Howard, Bynum, Brook Lopez, Gasol (sort of), Kaman (sort of), Horford (sort of).
Obviously, it’s easier to get a Noah/Chandler type than a Howard/Lopez type. Does it influence our thought process on the Love/Jefferson priority list? There seemed to be a growing consensus on this blog that folks were leaning towards picking Love over Jefferson if it came to that.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Dec 13, 2009 2:10 AM CST up reply actions
this is an interesting trade. i’m on board for the wolves, less so for the bulls, but i guess here’s the long and short of it:
-al to noah is not a massive downgrade for the wolves (see my extended debate with John Doe for details), but adding deng to a hodgepodge of ineffective wing players seems like a huge improvement.
-noah is a comparable rebounder to jefferson with nearly identical per 36 rebounding numbers for their careers, and noah improved substantially from his rookie year. noah outrebounded al last year and is doing the same this year. he’s a much better defender and last year was very efficient from the floor. that hasn’t been the case this year, and he’s hardly someone you can count on for volume scoring, but he should continue to improve his offensive game. if you value the option to toss the ball into the post for jefferson enough to call him the better player, i won’t necessarily argue, but noah is no slouch.
-deng’s contract is bad. he’s an inefficient scorer and a subpar passer. he is however, a good rebounder for a wing player and a pretty good defender too. he’s also someone that defenses would pay attention to on the wing, something that can’t be said for any of the wolves current swingmen outside of gomes. but again, his contract is awful for a player of his caliber. so unless he becomes the luol deng of ‘06/’07, it has to make you think twice about the deal. it wouldn’t cripple the wolves after losing jefferson’s deal, so there’s still hope of acquiring more talent at the 2/3 slots, but don’t lose sight of that contract in discussing a deal like this.
in the end, i’d pull the trigger if i were the wolves and considering the bulls ditch the worst contract in the deal, i can see them doing it too. the wolves would be building a collection of good players who can’t be The Man on a great team, but who could be excellent role players if the right star player comes along. this sort of deal is definitely worth looking into.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
Interesting thought came to mind while reading this
Try to swing a 3 team deal with the Wizards. They have had plenty of time to realize that their current lineup of Arenas, Butler, and Jamison aren’t working. So we send Jefferson to Chicago for Noah, they send Deng to Washington and Washington sends us Butler. To make the deal more attractive, we also send Flynn to Washington to make them ok adding on the years. We net Butler and Noah, fix 2 main concerns for us, while making Sessions our new starting PG with Rubio in the wings. We even cut a few years off by not getting Deng. We still end up with a top 5 pick this year to net ourselves Turner/Henry/etc. I don’t know what I even think of this, so please everyone, feel free to rip it apart. And I don’t know if Chicago would go for it still. Interesting point, trade machine gives the Wizards a 5 win improvement without Flynn involved and a 7 win with him. Don’t understand trade machine sometimes… unless I am just really overvaluing Butler and undervaluing Deng (Chicago loses 4 and we lose 4without/5with Flynn).
without flynn, i can’t see washington essentially flipping butler for deng, but that is a much better deal for the wolves (though butler hasn’t been himself so far this year).
if i’m the bulls, i’d want a sweetner of some sort thrown in, something like one of the wolves many, many picks. maybe that’s just me, since we’ve already established that i think less of jefferson than most people seem to.
and i pay no mind to the trade machine’s win/loss calculator. if PER is the main judge of how teams will fare, i have trouble taking it seriously.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
That's the thing though
I thought it used PER, but Deng’s PER is lower than Butler’s by almost 4 points and it still had them winning more with Deng than Butler… And like I said we lost 5 games by flipping Jefferson and Flynn for Noah, Butler, and Crittenton. I guess it’s obvious that PER is not the only stat though otherwise the teams would always lose/gain the same amount…
Do you think Deng/Flynn is enough to get Washington to provide that sweetner? They have a pretty high salary maybe a trade exception could convince them to provide that. They have a lot of guys to evaluate by next year. I count 9 guys on a 1yr contract, but that includes a few guys they will probably want back. Speaking of which, how much would we pay for Mike Miller’s services next year? Say 3 years at 3M/per? I’d take that.
yeah, if the wolves took on more salary, the wizards might be willing to toss something in for the bulls. the deal is getting more and more complicated now though, which means that it’s more and more likely that one of those little additions is a dealbreaker for someone.
hmmm, i have no idea what the trade machine uses if not PER, but i can see hollinger predicting more losses for the wolves no matter what for giving of jefferson. the hollinger numbers love big al.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
I think you might be on to something here...
This feels like a great deal for the Wolves. I’ve had vague, fleeting thoughts of Butler as the wing we could target, but never really worked through them. It makes worlds of sense, doesn’t it? Kind of surprising we haven’t talked about it more, because it really wouldn’t surprise me at all if Kahn made a move for him.
Sessions/Crittenton
Brewer/Ellington
Butler/Gomes
Love/Hollins
Noah/Jawai
With probably a rookie or two added to the line-up and Rubio coming soon, I like that line-up. Good idea. What does this do to our offseason cap space?
That's the great part
we don’t actually add more than a couple mil to our cap space and we even cut some length off. Not sure how their contracts change next year though (maybe they are even front loaded! Nah, but that would be nice) Of course Noah will have to be resigned in a year so that part kinda hurts. But Butler is on a 2 year contract. Supposedly he really likes Washington though, so it might be a tough sell for him.
What is people's faschination with Caron Butler?
The dude turns 29 this season and appears to have peaked two years ago. Clearly there is some great appeal to acquiring a guy who wasn’t even really a star at his best and watching him begin to deteriorate as soon as he gets here, because I’ve seen his name thrown around on every Wolves board I visit. Does he come with a time machine?
I agree that Butler > Deng right now. But for how much longer will that be the case? As lukewarm as I am toward Deng, Butler is even less appealing. He would have looked great alongside KG. Now… not so much.
Absolutely.
Until this team gets to 45 wins (in one season, versus collectively over two or three years), there is no reason to add a highly-paid player whose better days are behind him—unless taking on the contract brings a better additional asset as well.
Well
it’s nice that he will be out of a contract by the time he turns 31. So really we aren’t going to be plagued with his deteriorating years if he doesn’t work out. He is going to be a very valuable expiring contract next year or for sign and trade whereas Deng would not be. He’s a good defender and pretty athletic. He seems to have more injuries than Deng, but less worrisome ones. Mostly for me, the contract on Deng scares me away.
Fair points.
I guess I prefer the romantic notion of acquiring all the pieces all at once, signing our Rudy Gay to add to the team, and then watching everyone enter their primes together.
It’s not really that Butler has a bad contract, it’s that I’m not sold on the idea that we could flip his expiring for a new, younger SF. It’s no sure thing.
I’m going to stop commenting in this thread though, I’m being too negative. I really just want to keep Big Al.
I like the Noah idea
always felt the Wolves should have taken him over Corey. Not sure I would make this deal though. Deng seems like kind of an enigma to me.
That being said, I think Noah would be a great compliment to Love.
Can you imagine those two
with LeBron at the 3?
LeBron gets his ultimate stretch 4 and his ultimate garbage bucket 5, plus both will crash the boards like crazy men any time one of his drives pulls extra defenders away from being able to box them out.
Kind of what I was thinking
although assuming LeBron is out of reach I think some other dynamic wings would work. Having these two and Pekovic really would free up the assets to get the wing players the Wolves need.
What this trade comes down to for me is this
Pekovic.
Giving up Al reduces our low post scoring significantly, but adding Noah upgrades or maintains everything else. Pekovic is EuroAl, so if we were to do this trade I would hope every effort would be made to bring Pekovic over.
And for what it’s worth, I don’t think Pekovic needs to score 25 points a night in the low post either. I think somewhere in the 14-20 point range between Noah and Pek combined would be enough to keep space for our wings.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
I agree completely
we lose a lot of scoring with Al gone, but I think it’s worth it if we can find an ok replacement for it. I also said that Favors moves up our draft board if we go this route.
By the way,
I cross-posted this question at the Bulls SB site, and they are split evenly between liking it alone or with additions, and not liking it.
One kind soul over there has offered up Ty Thomas, Salmons, and Jerome James for AlJeff and Damien Wilkins.
Who are the Bulls fans trying harder to keep
Deng or Noah?
I just saw the future. The Wolves get Wall next summer, then move Al and Utah 1st rounder for Noah and Deng. Then move Deng and Flynn for an All-Star SG. You have:
PG – Wall and Sessions
SG – All-Star to be traded for later – Backup is Brewer
SF – Trade involving Rubio and cap space – Backup is Brewer
PF – Love and Noah
C – Noah and Aldrich perhaps (trading up with Pekovic and Charlotte picks)
They love Noah
and like Deng (but hate his contract). So we’ve all got those things in common, which is nice . . .
I read the Bulls thread
seemed like a lot of opinion and not much evidence. Too many responses like, “No, because Noah is our building block.” Also, my personal favorite, “We can’t trade 2 starters for 1.” Haha, should we offer them Brewer and Hollins for Rose?
Thanks for the info
I stated earlier I am a Noah fan. Ever since college, he just seems to be a guy that knows how to win and does things that help teams win. I know it would be crazy, but I think the Wolves would be better with Love/Noah than Love/Al., even without Deng.
With dynamic wings and competent PG play, I really see a Love/Noah front court working on a contending team.
Won't win much
Deng and Noah can’t even win in the east, why would they be able to win out here, neither is a 1 or 2 so why trade for them, though Deng is nice his contract is a little too much for my liking. If Anything we should ship Love and find someone to Compliment Al.
If Anything we should ship Love and find someone to Compliment Al.
be careful what you wish for…
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
From an offensive standpoint
which is harder to find? A rebounding PF with shooting range? Or a rebounding PF with good offensive moves inside 15’? What are the chances of getting a 7’ C with range to pair with Al? Or is it easier to find a 7’ C with decent post moves to complement Love? Neither is easy to find.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 14, 2009 9:23 PM CST up reply actions
Which is harder to find
A guy who can average 15 points and 8 boards a night on the low block by himself, or a guy who can give you a double double every night and allows the previous guy to become a 20-11 guy every night?
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Dec 15, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions
Wow you need a reality check
So now you’re claiming love makes Al a 20-10 guy? Al in his first season here with out Love was getting 21-11 every night. The only reason he struggled at the begging of this season was due to him being out of shape due to the ACL injury. I can’t believe you just posted that nonsense, Al comming into this season had been averaging 11 boards a night in his 3 previous seasons. Al is starting to get his step back, which is why he is playing better.
For the record
Al himself said some of his improved performance was due to the return on Love and his ability to hit the 3 and space the floor. But he also said that he is feeling a little better too (unless that last part I just mentally added…can’t remember).
Fact is that Love and Al’s offensive games complement each other’s style of play. Love can stretch the field but isn’t very good in interior post moves (except for gabage putbacks), while the reverse is true for Al. Having Love just enables Al to focus on what he does better. What biggity said isn’t untrue, but it also isn’t the case that Love magically makes Al better as if Al wasn’t capable of putting down 20-10 by himself. He can just do it with better efficiency with Love out there.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 15, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions
Perhaps
You may be right, the Wolves are a better team with BOTH Al and love out there, but alot of guys who simply think Love magically makes Al a 20-10 guy while ignoring the fact that he was getting 21-11 a night here before love came, and Ignoring the ACL injury which set Al back.
Al always has had the ability
to be the 20-10 guy. In my mind the difference has to do with how efficiently he can get his 20 points. When his teammates can’t space the floor, he has to chuck up alot more shots. But with the right personnel (love being one option), Al has a lot more room to operate and get much easier buckets and giving his teammates more chances to contribute without them all going to Al.
I think most people have this same basic dicotomy as Al’s best and worst case scenario for the future. I hope he can continue to be the Al that can play off of Love and his teammates. It will be better for the wolves and Al’s career. No one wants to be Zack Randolph 2.0.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 15, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
true
but he is exepted…b/c he is already 1.0.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 15, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions
There's more to the game than stats.
Fact is without Love the team was 2-16, with him we are 5-10.
Besides low post scoring (which Love is improving at) Al Jefferson does nothing better than Love. You have to watch Love to see his true value but look at last night’s game, we were down 17 with under 5 min left. We climbed back to within 3. Now it isn’t a win but it’s still pretty impressive. If you watched that game you would know that it wasn’t Jefferson who put the team on his back, but Love. He single handedly brought the team back.
by Bad News Wolves on Dec 31, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions
Don't like the trade...
I don’t think it’s a terrible deal, since Noah is playing well and Deng is a legitimate starting player at the 3. I just wouldn’t give up Al, since when healthy he is an All-Star caliber player.
Aside from the injury last year, Al has improved steadily since he entered the league. He was dropping 21 & 11 before Love joined the Wolves, 23 & 11 with Love, and now we just need him to get fully healthy so he can continue the upward trend as he enters his athletic prime in a couple years.
The idea that Favors could replace Al’s production down low (which assumes we’re getting a Top-2 pick—which has NEVER happened to MN) is realistic to an extent, but also risky. There are a lot of freakish athlete types that never become low-block scoring options. If you build a team without low block scoring, you had better have LeBron James or something not far behind in the backcourt. I don’t think Flynn-Deng is enough firepower to carry a team.
Oh, and the comments that Al refuses to pass or can’t pass can probably stop — anyone who has been watching this year can see that he passes a lot. He’s the main option on offense, so he gets the ball a lot and shoots a lot. But he’s been passing it out more than he used to, and occasionally dropping dimes to cutters. Still has a ways to go to become a good or great passer, but it’s no longer a noticeable weakness.
agreed
Big props to Al for hitting the open man. My favorite pass this year was from the last utah game (I think) where Love passed around the post defender from under the basket to Al who slammed it home.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 15, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions
True
he’s playing the same amount of minutes as he has the past four years, and his assist total is up (albeit to a whopping two per game, but still). And part of that low number is due to both the people to whom he is passing, and the likelihood that he doesn’t pass as often because he doesn’t have confidence in the CoBrew’s of the team being able to finish. Finally, his multiple offensive moves require some concentration from start to finish, and that doesn’t allow for a lot of quick dishing out of the double team.
But assuming that a year from now this team has better offensive options at the 2 and 3, he’s going to have to get better at finding them when they’re open. He’s improved, but it’s still not a strength.
Right...
He’s not a great passer, but he’s also not a black hole. That’s all I’m saying. He kicks it back out, repositions himself and sometimes hits a cutting player. It’s not a strength, but it also doesn’t seem like a weakness, the way it used to.

by 















