Really?
OK, let me begin by saying that there are no two teams in the entire NBA that I like more than the Wolves and Spurs. I spent a fair amount of time in West Central Texas (hooray San Angelo) as well as the San Antonio area (hooray USAF) and I think there are very few teams in professional sports who do their thang better than the Spurs. All of that being said, last night's tilt was a brutal, brutal spectacle. First of all, Al Jefferson, Corey Brewer, Tim Duncan, and Manu Ginobili did not play. Secondly, the game was on League Pass Broadband and I had to listen to Sean Elliot. Can't we all just pass a law which states that all former Arizona Wildcats have to withdrawal from the public eye as a gesture of shame for their alma mater making the field of 64? It's about as maddening as the AIG bonuses. Anywho...
The Spurs did their typical thing last night: they came out with a clear game plan, executed it, kept the Wolves from driving to the hoop, hit the boards, and walked away with a victory sealed on the backs of free throws and offensive rebounding.
Normally, after a Spurs game I'd go on and on about the importance of possessions and how beautiful it is to watch a team go about its business in such a professional and relentless manner so that one minute they are up by 2 and then before you know it they have a 10 point lead in the 3rd. This is pretty much what happened last night. The Spurs packed it in, didn't send the Wolves to the line, and forced a poor shooting club to go over the top.
While the Wolves actually finished ahead of the Spurs on eFG%, the Spurs made a solid bet that they could make it up on the boards (Kevin Love was the only Wolf who gave a damn on the glass) and the line (without Big Al, they simply played back off of any T-Wolf who has something approaching a dribble-drive game).
Did I mention how much it sucks to have to listen to Sean Elliot call a game? Why couldn't this LPB game have happened against Eddie Johnson and the Suns? Hell, I'd take Tommy Points over Mr. Elliot.
Let's finish this thing up with a return of the bullet points:
- Ryan Gomes started the game like gangbusters. He was active, he had some nice hustle plays, and then, for the first time in quite a while, he disappeared behind poor shooting. Now, I'm not the type of guy to encourage poor shooting players to jack it up, but I was really hoping that Gomes would force up 15-20 shots. When he shoots the ball this means the Wolves are moving the ball well and that even on his misses, he is big enough to draw contact. Plus, it's not like any other T-Wolf can force it with as much (relative) effectiveness as Gomes.
- Mike Miller = 8 shots. Seriously, it's called basketball. James Naismith invented it a long time ago and the Spurs happen to play it very well. They came out with an obvious game plan (and pecking order) and as the single offensively capable veteran on a young squad, one would think that a player like Miller would have a bit more situational awareness. Hell, this sort of thing wasn't exactly a problem on the night before for the Thunder. Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, and Jeff Green know where their bread is buttered. Craig Smith had 1 less shot in nearly 20 fewer minutes than Miller. I don't normally complain about Miller's lack of shooting; he did have a team high +6 and he brings a relative wealth of extras to the squad, but come on. This was a game where the team needed him to jack up some shots more than they needed him to run the offense. Miller was also the recipient of one of the worst technical calls I've seen in a long while. His offense? He tossed a ball to an official who wasn't looking after an offensive foul call. Oh, the humanity!!!
- If Randy Foye isn't going to run the point or make shots, he needs to bring more than 0 rebounds and 1 assist.
- I know the Spurs didn't exactly field a full squad, but you can really tell the years are adding up with the players they do have. Yes, Greg Popovich didn't have to dig into his bag of tricks to pull this one out against a bad Wolves team but at this point in the season I just don't think there is a switch they can turn on against a superior squad.
- Kevin Love is going to be a very, very good player. In many ways, he already is. 7-11 with 17 points and 19 boards in just over 31 minutes is pretty good. He also got to the line a team high 5 times. One of his misses was a late-game three attempt. 70% shooting with boards and free throws = awesome. He did have some issues with help defending Tony Parker off the dribble. When Love went to the bench, the Wolves had huge problems on the defensive glass. It will be interesting to look through the Game Flow to see just how much they gave up on the boards without Love on the floor. Love now has a 17.97 PER. He gets to the line, doesn't turn the ball over, and he rebounds like a fiend. He shot over 50% in January and February and his mid range game will come (along with additional passing).
- Love's Basketball Reference page now has a sponsor:
Devilzsidewalk sponsor(s) this page.
Kevin Love > Brook Lopez and OJ Mayo - AND THAT'S A SCIENTIFIC FACT!!! Now I don't want to hear anymore about how McHale screwed up the pick, this bus is HOF bound. So no more about MayoTheGreat or Brook Olajuwon (I'm looking at you Jonathan Watters!)
- Rodney Carney had a weird play in the 2nd. He made a dunk that hit the bottom of the net (which was closed shut by Roger Mason) and popped out. It was called as a blocked/missed shot. It should have been a goal tend.
- The Wolves had an unfortunate stretch of possessions near the end of the 4th where Sebastian Telfair was clearly fouled on a drive to the hoop. It went uncalled and the next trip down the court Tony Parker was "fouled" by Kevin Love. Parker made the first free throw, missed the 2nd, and the Spurs got the rebound and made a bucket. On the next time down the court Bassy forced the action again and got the call he should have received a possession earlier.
Well, that about does it. It wasn't exactly a beautiful game to watch but at least both teams had the good sense not to wear any silly green uniforms.
Until later.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kevin Love
Player A, rookie, age 20, per36 minutes – 15pts, 13reb (5 OReb) on 46% shooting, 78% free throw
Player B, rookie, age 21, per36 minutes – 18pts, 11reb (4 OReb) on 55% shooting, 73% free throw
Player A is Kevin Love, player B is Charles Barkley. Take from that what you will.
the shooting will come...
…he’s going to be very, very good.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
On his basketball-reference page
Love has a 4.2 WinShare… on a 20-win team. That’s sick.
www.canishoopus.com
Heard an interview with Love recently
Can’t remember where or when (KFAN Post-game?) but, he was asked if he would eventually develop out from his mid-range game to a legitimate NBA 3-point threat.
His answer?
“I guarantee it!”
yeah I agree with you all
that the shooting will come, one nice thing to see is that he’s really learning to finish better at the rim, I know Duncan wasn’t playing but still, it’s clear he’s using his body a lot better close to the basket.
By the way how crappy must the Wolves feel when the opposing team basically decides it can rest its best player against you…and still wins relatively easily. This season needs to end.
by plinytheelder on Mar 18, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Sean Elliot is the greatest UA player
And a pretty awful announcer. Steve Kerr? Eh. Can you imagine Gilbert Arenas doing color, though? That would be solid. As a UA alum, I won’t get into whether or not they deserve to be in the tourney until after Friday when they play. Ok, honestly? They didn’t, but I could give two bits, because no matter what, it’s 25 YEARS in a row!!! Kentucky can suck it.
What...
Brief comments on tonight’s game:
What a ridiculous goon Kurt Thomas is? Or Bruce Bowen? Or George Hill? Or Fab Oberto? Wait a minute David Stern…you mean you’re actually allowed to beat the crap out of the other team and not get called? Funny how teams like the Wolves and Suns never seem to enjoy that benefit. If I treated Steve Nash like you instructed your refs, I’d be in jail right now…
Sorry, but the Spurs titles are the ugliest, most unexplainable thing I have ever seen. Tim Duncan is a great player. Besides that, what did Bruce Bowen ever do to earn the respect of refs that allows him to physically assault other players? Why is Tony Parker allowed to carry the ball every time on his way to the hoop? Why is a douche like Manu Ginobili continually allowed to hack and flop like the annoying sh!t that he is?
Bottom line: It’s all about rep in the NBA. When we had KG, we had a little bit. Now we don’t. We need to get it back…
"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"
There was one play...
…I didn’t write about where Cardinal was undercut by Hill. No call. An advantage was clearly gained and there was no call. They also missed some fairly obvious calls going the Wolves way. The one where Cardinal lost the ball without being touched by a Spur and it went out of bounds in front of a ref and they still gave it to the good guys was pretty bad. I think there was a rookie ref in the game. Whatever it is, it was an ugly performance by the zebras.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
actually
on the replay of the Cardinal out of bounds play, I thought I saw a Spurs guy hit the ball out of BC’s hands. I thought it was a good call. I was watching the league pass feed (but it sounds like you were as well, so maybe I’m wrong).
Roger Mason Jr
bess role playa in de NBA. by far. if you cud even call him dat de bou is THOWED mayn in de 3rd ECERYTIME he had de rock i wuz terrified an he sank it AYTIME mayn! ah mayn!
Kevin Love is a fuckin FIEND mayn! yea SnP!!! too bad fiendish foye been missin uv late.
i miss Dat Boi Al. Bassy iz a KEEPER too.
MAYN HOL UP!
“He tossed a ball to an official who wasn’t looking after an offensive foul call.”
Like toss it to hurt him? Or just give a pass because the ball needs to go to the ref after a foul call but the ref wasn’t looking?
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
it was a harmless....
….toss back to the ref after a call. The ball landed in Miller’s hands and he tossed it to the ref so he could take it out of bounds. It wasn’t hard at all. Miller was frustrated for sure, but the toss itself was completely benign.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
awtch…
Beater of the early Thabeet drum
by Wim (Belgium) on Mar 18, 2009 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah it was bullshit
and then to top it off Bowen rakes him across the face a few seconds later and no call. I don’t mind the Spurs, and I disagree with mutleyil about them not deserving their titles, but to my mind Bowen is a dirty player. Completely disrespects the game. In a different sport there would have been repercussions by now, I imagine: in football he would have been chopblocked, in cycling he’d have been run into a gutter.
by plinytheelder on Mar 18, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Bowen...
…should have met an enforcer a long time ago were there such things in basketball. I’m glad there aren’t, but he does seem to write more checks than he should be able to cash in terms of questionable play. Glen Davis is my favorite example of this sort of player. He’s straight-up cheap.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I haven't seen Davis enough to comment,
but yeah, there’s a whole legion of guys (Carter, R. Allen, A. Stoudemire, hopefully now Mike Miller) who have called out Bowen for his dirty play in the past. People argue (in the case of Carter and Allen) that they’re just angry because Bowen shuts them down, but I don’t think that comes anywhere close to telling the whole story. I agree with you, I’m glad the NBA doesn’t really have enforcers…but you have to wonder sometimes.
by plinytheelder on Mar 18, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I have a love/hate thing...
Or maybe more of a like/dislike thing with the Spurs. I admire their systemic approach to personnel moves, but watching them on the court, I just want to scream “shut the f*ck up!” They constantly work the refs about calls that shouldn’t go their way and are allowed to get away with things defensively that shouldn’t be allowed. Some of my favorite Wolves games came during the KG era when they won in SA despite those types of things. Last night’s game wasn’t as bad because The Flopper and Ol’ Bug Eyes weren’t playing, but they make it really hard for true fans of the game to root for them in the playoffs because of that other crap.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Mar 18, 2009 12:00 PM CDT reply actions
they definitely work...
..every available angle.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
the thing I kept wondering down the stretch
was this: why all the Gomes iso plays? I don’t mind him taking as many shots as he wants…but to have the offence entirely set up to get him the ball, several straight times down the floor? I just don’t get it. Telfair missed a 3 down the stretch and it wasn’t even his fault, he got the ball to Gomes like it seemed he was supposed to and then Gomes fired a desperation pass back out to him when help came from the weakside and he didn’t see it. To my mind he can be a finisher in the Wolves’ offence but he shouldn’t really be an instigator, pretty much everyone else on the court is more creative than him.
He's the best option we've got at times....
We are seriously lacking guys that can breakdown their man and put the ball in the hoop or get to the line, so he’s the least bad option in a lot of cases. And Gomes isn’t a good finisher either in that he doesn’t have elite slashing skills nor the hops to receive passes over the top of the defense.
Foye, Gomes, and Carney are all fairly useless if their shots aren’t falling. Granted, Gomes and Carney can play a some solid D too, but overall these guys are all just blah to me. Good enough to hang around the NBA for the next 8 years and earn some minutes, but not good enough to be big difference makers.
by Rascal Flatts on Mar 18, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
I see your point, but I disagree slightly.
First, let me say that I agree with you about Gomes not being a great finisher, and I should have used a different word above, since finisher connotes a guy getting the ball at the rim and dunking it or laying it in. What I meant is more this: I find that Gomes is quite effective at times at hitting shots that others have set up for him, whether they’re around the elbow or (at times) at the 3-pt line. So when I say finisher, it’s more in the sense of ending plays that other guys have started – e.g. hitting open shots. My bad.
I do think you’re selling Foye a bit short though. Basically what I mean is this. To my mind there have been 3 above-average performances by Wolves players this year. The first was Jefferson’s overall offensive play before he got hurt. The second has been Love’s rebounding (especially offensive) and interior passing, especially during the team’s best streak (Jan. and a bit of Feb. if I have the dates right). The third was Foye’s play during said streak. Basically everyone else on the team, be it Miller, Telfair, Carney, etc., has played well at times…but it’s never (with the exception of single games or halves or quarters here and there) been at an elite level – when they’ve played well they’ve simply been performing their roles at an adequate NBA level.
Foye (as well as Love, I’d argue) has obviously suffered from not having Jefferson to occupy defenders, and his play has fallen off. But I think he proved during that streak not only that he was a pretty good 2nd option (on a team that was winning no less), not to mention a very good passer and good, at times very good, defender.
I don’t know exactly what his role will be as the team evolves. But I do disagree with your point about him not being a big difference maker. There are some obvious problems – his weird “tweener” size for one. But I’m not as concerned by this as some others. Someone on this site, actually I’m pretty sure it was S/P but don’t quote me on that, mentioned Vinny Johnson as a possible best-case scenario for Foye. I’d be fine with that…I guess the point I’m making is just that I think he can be a pretty big difference maker (not unlike Vinny Johnson for that matter) on a very good team.
by plinytheelder on Mar 18, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions
January 2009
He needs to return to that version of Randy Foye, because in 4 years at ‘Nova and all of his other time at Minnesota, he’s been a streaky volume shooter that uses a lot of possessions to get his points……with the exception of that one month. Until he can give me more than one month in a 7 year time span, I’m a skeptic. I had hope in January, but he quickly stamped it out with a return to the old Randy Foye soon thereafter. Hopefully his efficiency improves once he takes his rightful place on the bench and we replace him with a real shooting guard. I still can’t believe after 4 years of barely cracking 40% shooting in college, that somehow McHale thought he’d transform into a top notch guard in the pros.
by Rascal Flatts on Mar 18, 2009 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions
fair enough
and to a certain extent I agree. As far as this year goes, it seems he’s been hurt by the loss of Jefferson more than some others…then again he had further to drop.
I wouldn’t totally agree with “one month in a 7 year time span” – no doubt the guy is streaky, but you don’t get to be player of the year in arguably the best league in the country by being nothing more than a streaky volume shooter. I think the guy can do quite a lot on the court.
I agree with the main thrust of your point however, and I think you have good grounds for your skepticism – there has to be more consistent play from him. I think next year, with Jefferson back in the lineup, is going to be the key.
by plinytheelder on Mar 19, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions

by 
















