Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Lesson Learned

Parish_mcbird_medium

 

McHale to his starters: "Your efforts have landed you on the bench."

McHale to the fans: "My efforts have filled an entire team with bench players."

Papa Glen to McHale: "You're fired.

OK, I made up that last one but what more do fans need to see that McHale and this franchise can no longer co-exist?  Where else did people see this thing ending with McHale?  Let me go back to something I wrote on December 11th (highlights are new this time around):

Moving forward, this team is still run by the Country Club.  Toronto Rob and Freddie Iowa are still there waiting in the wings to do what exactly?  Wait until the end of the year and bring in Sam Mitchell?  Go check out some Raptors' sites and see what their fans think of Smitch.  Let's imagine the unthinkable and think about what would happen if McHale turns out to be the business as a NBA coach?  What then?

What if the Wolves play .400 ball down the stretch?  If they played that well from the get-go we're talking about a 32-33 win club.  Is .360 ball enough?  That's a 31 win pace over 82 games.  How about .340?  That's still a big improvement over last year and it would be right in line with what historical averages suggest as an improvement for a team as bad as what the Wolves were last year.  Ultimately, this nasty little possibility raises some fairly uncomfortable questions for those fans who believe Papa Glen pulled a Godfather and placed a horse's head at the end of McHale's bed by moving him out of the front office.  The Godfather option depends on the Wolves achieving the worst possible options both on the court and in the front office.  In order for it to work, McHale has to be bad enough as coach that he will simply walk away at the end of the year.  More troublesome is the fact that it also means that the Wolves are so bad that they can't even win/improve in the style of play that they were built for.  Like it or not, McHale has these guys playing like we thought they would from the beginning of the year.  We all know he was a failure as a GM, but now the owner has a large chunk of his fans rooting for him to be a failure as a coach as well.  That's bad juju.  It's f-ing with basketball karma every bit as much as is trading Brandon Roy for cash.  Perhaps it's simply a solid reminder that the big problem with this team all along has been the owner.  A culture of boobery abounds at 600 First Avenue.

He has to go now just as much as he had to go when Witt was fired.  Papa Glen cannot continue to kick the basketball karma gods in the teeth; this has to end. 

The second I turned on the game, the first thing that came to my head was not "Gee, McHale is going old school by benching his starters to get them play harder."  Nope, it was "Gee, I wonder what sort of old school move fans could pull to get Papa Glen to yank his coach and front office?"  Consistent standards?  On the Wolves? 

During my time in the military I was in charge of a small peace time flight (USAF unit) that developed domestic range targets to help fighter pilots train as they fight.  One of the guys in my group wasn't too hot at his job but he was a hard worker and everyone really liked him so we moved him into training.  It worked out well for a while but eventually the baggage associated with his sub-par performance in the real world caught up to him in the class room and it spiraled downward from there.

It isn't a perfect analogy but when the guy who put the damn team together is demoted to coach and then has to bench his starters in favor of players who are well below replacement value, perhaps the irony of quality control isn't lost on the high draft picks who started the game in the cushy seats. 

Of course, as is the case with a franchise that pretty much tells karma to go F herself, there is an ugly side to even the events that should be considered as necessary goods.  Should McHale get fired (or walk away) what does it say about the players who remain and whom he collected?  Epic. Fail.  Either way it's messy.  I'm not going to say that firing McHale and the entire front office is less messy than keeping them around, but it is the first step in mending the cosmic fence with sweet lady karma.

As for the game, this marks the third game in a row where I'll give the actual game the time it deserves: zip. For a game wrap from the perspective of the fans who have a team that hasn't quit, please head on over to our excellent sister site Liberty Ballers. While you're over there, check out their excellent Blueprint for Success post, which was based on our very own Building a Winner writeup.   Very good stuff.

BTW: Final lesson for the Wovles...when you hand out a commerative poster:

612_1238008489_medium

Please tell the artist that they can add an "L" to the original:

2069953_medium

It's called "artistic license".  For the folks who signed off on the poster, it's called "quality con...never mind.

Until later.

0 recs  |  Comment 67 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Canis Hoopus

Wrap up of McHale

Jun 2009 by Stop-n-Pop - 62 comments

McHale fires the first shot

Jun 2009 by Stop-n-Pop - 52 comments

What the Tweet?!

Jun 2009 by Stop-n-Pop - 64 comments

Initial Reaction Thread

May 2009 by Stop-n-Pop - 56 comments

Glen Taylor for Sameness

May 2009 by Stop-n-Pop - 40 comments

Comments

Display:

BTW: Final lesson for the Wovles...when you hand out a commerative poster:

Don’t Come to Canis Hoopus for Ideas when you hand out a commerative poster either :D Jk Man…

by Tony_O on Mar 25, 2009 9:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

we will at least make sure....

….the team’s logo and name are in full view ;)

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sticking with my theory...

That McHale is just stupid. He’s a moron. I’m dont trying to rationalize what he’s doing. You can’t rationalize the mind of a moron.

Also…

I don’t know what’s 6 steps beyond “getting old”, but whatever it is, I’d use it to describe Miller’s “I just suffered a debilitating injury but I’m going to valiantly fight through it” shtick.

by Blakeley on Mar 25, 2009 10:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Is it irony...

That I mistakenly typed “dont” and not “done” when describing McHale’s idiocy.

by Blakeley on Mar 25, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hear what you're saying....

…i don’t think these guys can see the forest through the trees at this point. when the guy who put the team together has them quit on him and he can’t even use his own draft picks and personal choices as starters, those of us left around don’t view it as a motivational tactic. it’s a failure, plain and simple. can we mercy rule this thing with 10 to go?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 25, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh heh.

We would have also accepted “LOLves.”

by PoorDick on Mar 25, 2009 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few thoughts

1. It’s funny that Rodney Carney can go 7-8 from 3 and post a -9 in 32 minutes. This has to be a rather rare for an NBA player especially one in a reasonably low-scoring game.

2. Some might think this will be the stupidest point ever made on this blog which is fine. I do think McHale gets a bad rap as a GM to a degree. Since he traded KG he has generally made positive moves. He was also pretty highly thought of until the Western Conference finals team fell apart. . It’s funny to think how different his rep might look if Cassell never gets hurt in 2004 or Marbury doesn’t bolt town.

 The majority of his really poor moves occured in trying to make a run when the pieces weren’t going to be in place (Foye as a 1, Marko trade, Ricky Avis/Wally trade).

It’s also generally unfair to evaluate draft picks against the best possible pick in a spot. For example in looking at the 2005- the Three players picked right before McCants have little to no NBA value along with 4 of the 6 picked right after him with Joey Graham a mediocre entity.

While Foye isn’t great-the 3,4,5 picks were all major busts along with the 9-12 picks. Also say what you will about Craig Smith-he’s one the better number 2 picks from the second round in 2006. I think Smith’s a decent backup 4 if you surround him with a 5 that can actually control the paint somewhat. The player I described though currently doesn’t exist on the Wolves roster.

I’m not trying to argue that I’m a fan of McHale’s draft record only that often expectations are somewhat unrealistic in this area.

3. The point is often made and rightly so that the Wolves lack talent out there. The starting lineup tonight I question “if it could win a D-League title?” It’s also true that McHale put this team together- while most acknowledge he’s done a solid job since the KG trade in collecting pieces, draft picks and contracts. I do wonder how much blame can go to McHale for Injuries, Inconstiency (Foye), Implosions (McCants) and the bizzare( Mike Miller)?

The basic plan for this team that inspired hope in people like Hollinger before the season was strong rebounding combined with good outside shooting. When these things worked in January the Wolves looked like a .500 team. When the shooting has been awful and the rebounding mediocre they look like a .150 team.

I would never argue for McHale being a great NBA coach at this point in time. I just figure take a 30-35 win team to begin with and lose the pieces he has during the season- how successful any coach would be?

  A better question to ask is “What would be the upside with great coaching for the team they’re currently putting out there?”

  Considering they’re an awful defensive team that’s undersized with no one better than a number 3 scoring option on the team. On a Championship team you have 1 starter and he played 22 minutes tonight.

A different question is if McHale were to be gone- “What direction should the team go in it’s coaching search?”

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 25, 2009 11:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The team definitely lacks talent

and badly needs this next season’s infusion of draft picks, as well as the return of Al and Brewer. The NEED to hit on these draft picks, and at least get contributors. No Ebis or Will Averys, please.

Really, the T-Wolves have always lacked for talent, even when we had KG and were good. KG mostly covered up that we never had a second star of any kind, a second big man worth a fig, and never more then three (maybe four) above-average players. The one year we did (Sam Cassell), we were suddenly unstoppable, and Sam Cassell was never a world-beater at any of his other stops, just a good offensive playerr.

by princelyfrank on Mar 26, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Solid point....

…..they had KG at the height of his basketball powers and he made a huge difference.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

mchale is a saint mayn

compared to his fellow mn coach de fukface brad childrss. i cant believe he nixxed de cutler trade. i feel so angry and betrayed by de franchise i luv mo den anythang. i want to punch childress wit brass knuckles den….anh yall ont want me to go on myn…

as fo de wolves i think mchale shud come back. yall seem to forget january…no? we wuz CLICKIN mayn it wuz all comin in to place Al was playin betta den anywun in de league pretty much mayn.

dass de main reason we need mchale back: Al Jefferson. mayn iss no coincidence Al went from 20-10 under witt to sumthin like 24 12 unda mchale…i think mchale can tap into als potential de bes righ now mayn

MAYN HOL UP!

by MAYNHOLUP on Mar 26, 2009 1:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

did chilly really do that?

i don’t follow football at all and I turn the channel nowadays when it comes on kfan. isn’t cutler supposed to be really good?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This Cutler thing is strange

Denver would have to absolutely insane to trade him, unless it was for the grandest ransom of all time. I’m not sure the Vikes ever really had a chance to trade for him. And yes, he is very, very good, albeit not necessarily the ideal personality for your best player. But not the worst, either. Cocky, kind of a primadonna – could be the next Favre, basically.

But the story comes from a fight between Cutler and Broncos management stemming from rumors they were looking to trade him, which they have denied (while, possibly, simultaneously trying to trade him). It’s really unlikely to happen, though, especially not a team like the Vikes that have no decent QB to give in return.

by princelyfrank on Mar 26, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea it happened mayn

dey wanted to move him in a 3 way dat wudda sent Matt Cassell To Denver, Vikings draft picks to NE, an Cutler to MN. dis wudda happeend about 3 weeks ago. Childress nixed it. ima go slit mah wrists on sum jared leto shit now.

MAYN HOL UP!

by MAYNHOLUP on Mar 26, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so juss rememba, while iss frustratin what de wolves do

iss not like Mchale veto’d a trade fo Dwight Howard in exchang fo draft picks

MAYN HOL UP!

by MAYNHOLUP on Mar 26, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this is true, Chili needs that punch in the face.

All NE ended up getting for Cassell was a second rounder from KC. Could we have only given up one draft pick in this trade? If so, Chili – well, I would have said I’ve lost all faith in him but that actually happened years ago. He does seem determined to prove he can win without a quarterback or any kind of functioning offense. Sigh.

by princelyfrank on Mar 26, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What a completely random, disjointed, barely intelligible post

What exactly was the point of this nonsense?

"He has to go now just as much as he had to go when Witt was fired. Papa Glen cannot continue to kick the basketball karma gods in the teeth; this has to end. "

But the team was starting to show a lot of promise under McHale before Jefferson’s knee injury….. Was that “karma” too?

“The second I turned on the game, the first thing that came to my head was not "Gee, McHale is going old school by benching his starters to get them play harder.” Nope, it was “Gee, I wonder what sort of old school move fans could pull to get Papa Glen to yank his coach and front office?” Consistent standards? On the Wolves? "

WTF does this even mean? These two thoughts aren’t connected and don’t make any sense.

"It isn’t a perfect analogy but when the guy who put the damn team together is demoted to coach and then has to bench his starters in favor of players who are well below replacement value, perhaps the irony of quality control isn’t lost on the high draft picks who started the game in the cushy seats. "

Two of the team’s best players are out for the season with knee injuries! What are you expecting? Do you think Spurs fans were apoplectic when Robinson was out for the year?

"Of course, as is the case with a franchise that pretty much tells karma to go F herself, there is an ugly side to even the events that should be considered as necessary goods. Should McHale get fired (or walk away) what does it say about the players who remain and whom he collected? Epic. Fail. "

Except Jefferson and Love both look great… Does McHale not get credit for Love at all?

The Timberwolves have been positioned to have cap room in 2010 and amass young talent. Their best player went down with a knee injury. This is not a situation in which fans should expect a winning season The rebuilding of the Timberwolves began less than two years ago, and it shouldn’t be judged by a 20 game stretch in which the best player is sidelined.

But I guess that’s how it is with some fans when it comes to McHale. I remember when Dan Barreiro said McHale should have been fired because we didn’t draft Chris Porter.

by Rakocevicftw on Mar 26, 2009 3:16 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What a wonderful conversation with yourself

I didn’t like the post.

You didn’t?

No, not at all.

It didn’t have a point.

I see.

First of all, I see that you have recently started commenting here at the site and welcome aboard. Secondly, the cut and paste call and response is a no go here on Hoopus. If you want to argue about something, please argue rather than repeat and comment. I’ll give this one a pass but normally I cut these sorts of things.

In response to some of your points I will say a few things:

First, the Spurs book-ended their 20 win Duncan-getting season with a 59 win season and a 56 win season, both of which landed them in the Western Conference semifinals. I can tell you that Spurs fans were completely understanding as I was one in central Texas at the time. It was a pretty fun time. I can also tell you that the lest of the league was upset about the whole thing. The Wolves are going to bookend their injury season with 22 wins and…can we at least agree that 56 next year is out of the question? This example doesn’t even begin to compare to what the Wolves are going through.

McHale does indeed get credit for Love. This site has never claimed otherwise; nor have we claimed that the front office has largely done the right things since the KG trade. What we have argued is that their method is not reliable nor easily reproducible and that any success they come across owes a lot to luck (mistakenly aligning itself with a favorable probability; i.e. taking a player because he caught someone’s eye rather than said player meeting anything approaching an internal metric), rather than process. We have also argued that they have a long history of overvaluing assets and that a winning month against mostly sub-par (and injured) competition is a nice thing, but hardly something that you can bank on (i.e. they over valued it).

In January they won against the 10 win GSW without Maggette and Ellis. They beat the 14-20 Bulls, 11 win Griz, 5 win Thunder (Krstic’s 1st game and pre-Thabo), 9 win Clips with no Camby, Davis, or Kaman, NOLA without West or Chandler, the 18 win Bucks w a hurt Sessions and Bogut, a 22 win Bucks team w/o Redd and Bogut, an 18 win Bulls squad, and the 22-15 Suns straight up.

In the 20 game stretch between games 20-40, which goes from pretty much the end of Witt (19) and almost to the end of the Jan streak (1-20-09), the Wolves showed fair improvement in OE, eFG, defG, FT Diff, pts for, and pt diff. They also played at a higher pace in January than they did in the preceding month. Despite these gains, only OReb% was in the top 1/3 of league rankings. Almost all of their other indicators landed them in the bottom 1/3 of the league; hardly above last season’s rankings and even behind them in a few (eFG being one big one). It was hardly the Big Bang of a reborn franchise. It was nice to watch and really, really fun to see, but this team has exactly 1 month with more than 3 wins this season.

I think your argument also overstates the dip that the team took against serious competition beginning with Detroit on the 28th. In the 6 games before Jefferson got hurt, the Wolves went 1-5 with the lone win against a 19 win Pacer club. They were taken apart by LA, Boston, Atlanta, and Houston during this stretch. Granted, 3 of those teams are upper-level squads but it was their first real competition in a month and they reverted to what their averages would suggest…they just weren’t doing it against dinged up bottom dwellers.

Throwing out January, McHale is 6-35. Throwing out the 3-18 record since Big Al was hurt along with January and he’s 3-16. The team played March like they did December, going back to roughly 94 ppg, 80 fga/game, etc. The Wolves do have bad luck (injuries) but it is almost always accompanied by outright boobery, mismanagement, and the overvaluing of assets.

This team does have some significant assets moving forward. We have talked about them on this site many, many, many times. During our Building a Winner post we talked about how the team should probably stay the course and let this particular front office deal with the off season because it would be too hard to make a change between the end of the season and the draft. We also said that McHale should probably get an entire season behind the bench of a healthy team. After thinking about it for a while, I decided this was the wrong position to take and I wrote about it here.

Finally, this site prides itself on having discourse as far removed from some of the crasser elements of board posting as possible. Disagreement is welcome but dickishness is not, especially if you are going to accuse people of not making sense right before using an example that doesn’t make sense (see Spurs, San Antonio). A simple “I don’t agree,” “I didn’t get what you were saying,” or “I think this is the correct opinion” will suffice. This site is for solid give and take between solid fans, not cut and paste Gollum-esque soliloquies.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

whoops..

….this:

“I think your argument also overstates the dip”

should read this:

“I think your argument also underestimates the dip.”

I changed the sentence midway through and missed the most important word of the change. My apologies.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

More Points

A few general comments

1. The Front Office has seemed to do a better job of properly valuing assests since the KG blow-up. They let the market set contract rates from Telfair, Gomes, and Smith who while none of them proeject as long- term starters seem to have reasonable contracts for their skill set. They also didn’t give in to temptation and go overboard in moving expirings for Kirk Hinrich. There was no overvaluing OJ Mayo as an asset right after introducing him as a pick to the fans and the press. They saw a better trade and went with it. It seems the really terrible asset management (Hassell, Hudson, Davis, James, Jaric, Blount) all occured when they were unrealistically trying to rebuild a team without any assets or under pressure to keep a championship team in place.
It seems the front-office has improved in this regard to placing these things in proper context.

2. The most disappointing aspect of this season for me has been the overall shooting of the team. This figured to maybe be a strength with the possibility of 3-40% percent 3 pts shooters opening the floor for Al Jefferson (McCants, Foye, and Miller). All three have been disappointments in this area and I wonder how much of this can be traced to coaching?

3. I do wonder how much room for player development can really take place with the current roster. Players like Gomes, Smith, Carney, and Miller are probably going to be what they are? Telfair has improved but still faces limitations on D and with his shooting. Cardinal and Ollie aren’t going to develop at all. Love has clearly improved under McHale’s leadership though this could also be traced to experience. I don’t even want to begin to comment on Foye. My main point is that “Shouldn’t the OKC roster with its youth and talent develop better as the season goes along?” Whether McHale is going to be a good NBA coach long-term I don’t know. I’m just unsure about making declarative judgements with the situation at hand.

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 26, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree....

…about the shooting. It just has never made sense.

My response about the front office would be this: they chose Mayo and we have no idea why they graded Love so high. Was it just because he was McHale’s guy and he “scouted” him a’la Smith, Foye, Brewer, and McCants? Is it because if there’s one thing this club can do well is judge power forward talent (Smith, Love, and Jefferson are all good selections based on how they were acquired)? I don’t know but I also don’t trust.

The thing that worries me most is that they have a large amount of draft picks and assets but have never shown either creativity with acquiring assets (they’ve been ok at getting rid of them) or competency with getting the BPA in the draft. Roy was the clear pick. Brewer had significant red flags and wasn’t even the right pick on his own college team. They fubar’d the Chalmers pick. In a weak draft with lots of picks, I just think it’s time for something new.

I think the last sentence you wrote is probably the most realistic and useful argument against changing things. This season had injuries, coaching changes, and a nice month when everyone was together. It also had 1 month over 3 wins, very little non-Love improvement, and a front office that continues to simply do more of the same. They aren’t going to get another shot like this to rebuild for a long, long time. They have an All Star type player, a top 3 rookie, 4 possible 1st rounders and over $15 mil in expiring 09/10 contracts.

New eyes, new ideas.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Front Office/Coaching

1. I do question how the Wolves haven’t acquired assets as draft picks would be considered assets along with cap space. I’m guessing you meant this to mean specific players. My basic point in defending the front office is "Why clean an front office if people think they’ve done a solid job putting the team in place for 2 years (KG trade, Love trade, Davis/Heat trade, Carney trade)

2. I know I’m a bigger Brewer fan than you. He had a pretty nice college record with room to improve if he could get his shooting and handle better. He also projected with the possibility to be a unique defender at the next level due to quickness and hops. I do question the love for Joakim Noah considering that earlier this year- everyone was ready to run out of Chicago. We’re not sure if Brewer would have developed like Noah this year. I do know for sure his skillset was greatly missed during some of the layup drills- we’ve seen. A second problem with this love of Noah is that it probably means we’re looking at Jefferson, Noah, and Mayo vs Jefferson, Love, and Brewer. I realize some maybe like the first combo better- I don’t. I’m just nowhere near ready to write off Brewer yet as a NBA starting wing.

3. I’m not going to recap the Foye/McCants picks only to go back to my earlier point that it’s often unfair to compare the soundness of every draft pick to the absolute best option a couple years later.

4. As far as Coaching I’ve hashed out my point that they’re seemed to be development until AL was injured. This wasn’t upper level development as evidenced in the 1st Laker home game but rather nice progress. When Al got injured you feared they would only win a game or two due to lack of talent? With this in-mind I’m just not quite sure how to best evaluate the situation.

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 26, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder how much of the change...

…was attitude vs coaching. I’m not discounting that, but it’s more temporary than is solid coaching.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you can just throw January out

(Just as an intro, don’t take any anti-stat stuff I say personally, it’s just a difference in philosophy. Thought it should be said, internet communication can be misunderstood so easily.)

That stuff does not just happen. You can talk about their vitals placing them in the bottom third of the league during that month, but to me (a guy who has serious doubts about all the new stats in basketball) that means there might be something wrong with those numbers. At the very least it’s a pretty strong argument that they’re less than perfect. And I’m absolutely positive that “W-L” trumps them all in a month long sample size. The teams they played had a lot of problems, without question. But even with those issues we’re still talking about beating teams we never would’ve been beating before. This is absolutely not a case where we were a bad team that finally ran into some games it could win. Despite what the numbers may say, we were playing COMPLETELY differently. That was not the same team by any means, and I have no doubts McHale’s looser style had a lot to do with it.

So, I have no problem bringing McHale back for another year as coach only to see where this goes. The dip that happened before Al got hurt (in a game at N.O. that was down to the wire) was bound to happen, who knows what would’ve happened if he stayed healthy. McHale coming back is far more attractive than hiring Mitchell or most anyone else that we’re likely to be able to bring in. If we could convince Flip to come back that would be cool, but I have a hard time believing that’s possible.

As for Foye, let’s not forget he’s probably hitting some sort of wall, he still hasn’t had a chance to play a full season. I have faith. Possibly because he is on my fantasy team and I traded some good talent to get him.

by museum on Mar 26, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not really sure....

….I’m making that big of a numbers argument with this one. They won games against weak competition, most of whom were significantly depleted. They also benefited from a career month from one of their top 3 players. Here is where I would differ from you in terms of philosophy: In order for them to really account for what went right and what went wrong, they need to remove as many situational differences as possible. This doesn’t necessarily have to be with stats. I’ve run performance reviews in the business and military world where we talked about environmental factors (bad economy), personal factors (illness), and so on and so forth and then made decisions to weigh employee performance by 5, 10, or whatever percent. It’s sort of the counterbalance to the “all-things-being-equal” approach. All things aren’t equal and there were quite a few stars aligning in favor of the Wolves at the same time they changed the type of their play.

In this sense, stats are very useful. The Wolves played relatively good ball in January and they did so against a specific type of opponent. Does their January play translate to other months against superior opponents? How sustainable were individual efforts?

I won’t argue that they were playing a different type of ball than they were earlier in the year. What I will argue is that the quality of that ball is easy to overvalue, especially when only looking at wins and loses. They were a better team, but the question then becomes this: By how much and why? They have to take into account situational differences, and statistical analysis is a good way of doing this. It’’s not the entire answer (nor should it be) but it is a key part of any sort of performance review.

Getting back to the karma thing for a second, it’s just their luck that a single month of good ball will likely put them above the bottom 3 teams in the league. If they had simply had another one of their 2-3 win months, we wouldn’t be having this discussion and we would be talking about the high chances of a #1 pick and who will coach/GM next season. Here is the key question for those people not wanting a change: Is 1 month of moderately good ball against poor and depleted opponents enough for you to bridge the gap between a season where outside of that 1 month they were on pace for a 15-win season and whatever it is that they have now? Even before Big Al went down they were on a downturn. Before January, they still were losing games (although I think we can probably trace that streak to Dec 26th). Is 1 month of decent ball against sub par competition without their best players enough to confidently say that they can repeat that performance with everyone back? What if Big Al and Brewer play between 75-90% all next year? Does that count for another mulligan? I want change. I want it because I’ve had enough. I want it for change’s own sake. I want it simply to have a detached set of eyes come in and look at this roster and its assets. I want it because whoever will come in will be able to look at what happened in that one month and not be attached to the notion that it was a magical glimpse of the future…which is exactly what the current regime has at stake.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wanted to take the guitar in front of the Hard Rock...

and smash the Target Center with it for a long while, so I feel you on wanting change, I definitely understand. Growing up in Des Moines when Hoiberg was a star, it’s hard to say we should ditch him. I’m biased, what can I say? But a fresh set of eyes in the front office would probably be for the best. It’s a pretty simple decision, really.

As for coaching, yes, I did see enough in that one month to be OK with bringing McHale back. That has to do with January, but also because I don’t believe anyone with solid experience wanting to come here, so the alternative to McHale doesn’t strike me as appealing. Yes, clearly all things aren’t equal, but I liked what was happening enough to overcome all that. I believe the results had more to do with our play then what was going on with the other teams. That’s not to say that their troubles were irrelevant, I’m just putting our January wins on one side of a scale, and all the counterpoints to the wins on the other side. To me, the wins outweigh all that can be said to discredit them. I think McHale had something to do with those wins. I think that another year together and healthy (knock on wood) could be a great thing. I think we’d have significant improvement, and that’s coming from someone who’s been a huge pessimist on the Wolves since ‘05. Now, if we can get D’Antoni or Phil Jackson, it’s a different story.

As far as the draft, we’re not in terrible shape to get the top pick. Best odds don’t win out a whole lot in the lottery. I’m not enamored with anyone in the draft though aside from Rubio, so unless we get him, I’m not too concerned with it.

by museum on Mar 26, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough...

…i think you make some solid points.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

….you just gained a lot of points by being from Iowa. ;) I was born in Ames.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get that it’s getting hard to have the Draft as the most important (only) topic for a while now. It’s the 3rd year in a row now that we have to swallow that. I’ve ordered League Pass and really enjoyed it but when Jefferson went down … I haven’t watched a lot since.

I do still agree we need a new set of eyes in the Front Office. I do like what they have done post-kg. I was a big fan of Brewer, liked how he would makes us bigger and give us some D and I wasn’t a big fan of the K-Love trade but after a little while it opened by eyes and I’m sticking with the Highway Robbery take.

I get that it’s so frustrating to watch a team that has stinked for such a long while. Jaric, James, Davis, they have all been such disappointments.

There just isn’t any denying that there has been so much bad luck. The injuries, the Roy-Foye thing (most experts had them pegged as equals!) … the coin flip… I have to agree with Jose .. they have done a pretty good job and it just s*cks that we’re stinking it up right now but we can’t forget that we just had a boatload of bad luck…

Beater of the early Thabeet drum

by Wim (Belgium) on Mar 26, 2009 6:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

January

was fool’s gold. It was one month of good basketball against a schedule of horrible teams and some good teams with injured stars. It also featured probably the best Month of Randy Foye’s career.

The wolves have at least two options
1. Accept January as the proof that a solid plan is in place and stick with the status quo
2. Fire McHale, hire a new GM from outside the organization and let this person run the entire organization.

I think option #1 is more risky than option #2. What is Glen Taylor going to do if McHale and everyone else is back next year and this team still sucks? Taylor is literally buying at least a few more years of mild-relevance if he hires someone outside the organization. I mean, some of the people on this blog are taking about ditching this team if the status quo remains the screw up the draft and free agency next year.

At least if he makes a major move (like Donnie Walsh being brought in to the Knicks) the fans have a reason to be excited.

This situation is very much (but not exactly, of course) like the Knicks with isaiah thomas. Now, at least McHale seems to have had some clue about managing the salary cap, but it’s not like Isaiah made uniformly bad draft picks, etc.
I’m sure Zeke’s Knicks had a good month or two as well. And poor Zeke had to deal with Eddy Curry being injured, a rising star in the low post. But, finally after years of torturing their fans, Knicks ownership hired a real GM.

I hope Glen Taylor realizes that he is losing money by sticking with this group.

by littleboxes on Mar 26, 2009 9:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It will be interesting to see...

…just how much of an outlier Foye’s month was.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of Zeke...

….http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/58111/20090326/isiah_meets_with_clippers_owner_about_gm/

Isiah Thomas is actively looking for a new job and met with Clippers’ owner Donald Sterling about a front office position. The meeting was arranged by Mike Dunleavy.

Several NBA sources confirmed the February meeting to ESPN.com.

The talks were informal but substantive and there have been follow-up discussions.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hiring Isaiah Thomas...

is probably the one thing Glen Taylor could do to drive away more fans than he will be by bringing back McHale and the rest of the front office.

It’s not that the current FO isn’t capable of making some good decisions. Heck, it’s possible they are a solid group. But they have made mistakes and do continue to make mistakes. And yes, all organizations make mistakes, the the big issue for Glen Taylor has to be ticket sales. Bottom line: as much as bringing in a new front office is a basketball decision, it’s even more of a marketing decision.

He better really believe in McHale, Stack, and Hoiberg because if they come back and this team still sucks, this franchise is cooked. This isn’t the Knicks, folks, who can suck for years and ain’t moving. And I don’t mean to be dramatic, it’s just that another year of this incessant losing with the same leadership next year is just too much to take, even for diehard fans. Sure, the Wolves could bring back the same Front Office and maybe the hit a home run and all is well. But is that really that likely?

Glen can buy himself some time and some new fans by bringing in someone from the outside. Not just a coach, in fact, not a coach, but a new front office leader who hires the coach. I would think a solid front office hire in the middle of the playoffs would increase season tickets sales and provide some hope. C’mon Glen, conjure up the sound of green backs rustling in your hands…

I mean, I’d prefer they go with a real basketball mind, but at this point, hiring Barack Obama’s brother in law (I forget where he coaches) would generate some frickin’ interest in the squad.

I checked on the Knicks analogies. In 2007-2008 and 2006-2007 the Knicks never had a winning month. Not once. But they did go 7 and 8 once. It doesn’t seem straightforward to compare strength of schedule given all the injuries on the Twolves’ opponents, etc.

by littleboxes on Mar 26, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Craig Robinson...

…coaches at Oregon State. I think you make a good point about the possibility of this being the last best chance this team has in this market…or at least with this owner. The die-hards are the only ones left and I think if they fubar this go-a-round, it’s done. Outside eyes at least give him another chance.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry..

…i was going to link to that and I completely spaced it. My bad. Ball Don’t Lie got to it though.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey...

Not a problem, don’t worry about it.

And yeah, I just saw the BDL link this morning.

Thanks.

by College Wolf on Mar 26, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

also,

the single biggest desaster to befall the t-wolves was not McHails fault, but rests soley on the shoulders of papa Glenn.

As for last nights game/recent play, what really did you expect, we are missing, once again, key players due to injury, for most of the season. almost every starter has missed time due to injury this year. Miller, Big Al, and Brewer. Also, absolutely no one could have seen Miller turn himself into a poor mans lesser Magic Johnson, like he has recently. the K-Love trade, was absolutely the best trade of McHales tenure.

McHale has made good draft decisions in the past, KG, Starbury, and K-Love. Papa Glen gave away 3 first rounders for nothing. This compleatly hamstrung McHale, who was in a Win Now situation with little way of actually improving the Team.

Once the decision was made to switch to a rebuilding faze, he has made several good moves, getting Big Al, Draft-trading for K-Love (the better player), while exchanging bad long-term contracts for expireing contracts and draft picks.

The Roy-Foy deal was not in our favor, but at the time the 2 players were seen as being equally good prospects coming out of college, and there were (false) injury concerns about Roy. the biggest mistake was not in trading the pick, but in trading it for cash instead of picks, or players. this mistake was not made in the Mayo-love deal.

how much better would we be right now if 1. Miller would shoot the ball instead of pretending he has eyes on the back of his head. 2. Brewer had a full season to show that he was making legitemit improvement. 3. Big Al was still in the starting line up?

I don’t think that 30+ wins would be out of the question.

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Mar 26, 2009 9:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I also disagree

There have been some terrific posts to this point, and I don’t want to tread on them, but I feel I have to keep pointing out that this is a rebuilding team. We removed Garnett and the older veterans on this team to bring in youth, picks and cap space .. and we haven’t used the second two yet. On top of that, the most solid asset we got from the KG trade, Al Jefferson, is out.

January demonstrates that there is enough talent on the team to be competitive, and McHale deserves credit for turning these guys around under wittman, and being able to get them to stop playing with their tail between their legs. Now though, wins don’t help us, and we just need to finish the season, and after a month like this, January’s forgotten because the players can’t stay motivated?

This team was intentionally rebuilt for the future. Scapegoating because they aren’t winning now is short-sighted and unfair.

by shrink on Mar 26, 2009 12:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No way

You strike me as someone that doesn’t mind the status quo and happily gobbles up Papa Glen’s continuous BS. I, for one, am sick of it.

by College Wolf on Mar 26, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

These are all good points

Those posting above in support of the current front office make some good points.

The FO has made some good moves in the last two years.
January was a good month for the team and provides some hope.
It’s not clear how many good coaches are out there (to replace McHale).

These are things I tell myself so that I remain a Wolves fan.

But, I would be really excited if a front office change was made. And I think a lot of other fans would be pretty excited.

If a front office change was made
we would still have january
the new GM could make the decision about what coaches are out there
the wolves still have the results of all these good trades and draft picks.

There isn’t much downside to bringing someone new in. Even if they suck, it buys the franchise two to three years of renewed interest and loyalty (provided fans think the new FO is capable, i.e., imported from San Antonio or Houston, etc.).

There is tremendous downside to keeping the status quo. For example, whose decision was it to bring back Wittman this year? For everyone who backs McHale as coach, Wittman was a complete disaster. Do we trust the FO that brought back Wittman to steer this organization. Sure, you can argue that Wittman was all McHale, but are we sure?

The massive failure to show any improvement the first two months of the year generated much revulsion among the fans. This will happen to an even greater degree if the Wolves suck next year and bring all the leadership back.

by littleboxes on Mar 26, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

solid summary of all the points...

….there are some decent ones all around.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree on this...

and have intentionally stayed away from games this season because the status quo is still there. To me, a new VP of BB Ops is a minimum requirement. I like Stack and think he’d be good to keep in the organization, but beyond that, I could care less what happens to the rest. They’ll find jobs. McHale doesn’t need the $ or the stress; his presence with the team just adds a level of aggravation. Plus, hiring a guy like him in place of a guy like Wittman is replacing one polar opposite with another when what’s needed is someone more in the middle: a guy who can strategize and motivate. Even though Sam Mitchell or Flip Saunders wouldn’t be huge upgrades, I just get the sense that McHale would get lunched even by guys like Rick Adelman or Mike Brown come playoff time. I’m wary of a Vinny Del Negro situation, but as long as they hire a guy who’s at least been an assistant coach (like Ty Corbin or Brian Shaw), something like that could be averted. Plus, the players make the coach more than the other way around; McHale is just too much of a negative symbol for intelligent fans who want to support the team. Even bringing in a couple of respected veterans (a redux of the Mitchell/Porter deals in ’95) would help lend some credibility.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Mar 26, 2009 3:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This argument isn't even worth getting involved in...

because the people supporting McHale and bashing S-n-P either don’t watch wolves games, don’t understand the NBA, or both.

by roundhouse on Mar 26, 2009 4:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

January

ahh, January.

It was fun while it lasted. The Wolves were actually relevant for a short while. I won’t deprive anyone of their desire for starting over and getting rid of McHale.

If all we have is January for an argument to keep him, well, I’d have to say we don’t have much. I have always hoped McHale could redeem himself. I saw him play high school Basketball in the state tournament with my father when he was an assistant coach at Anoka HS and was scouting Hibbing for the State Tournament. I followed him all the way through his pro career, just as I did Randy Brewer, Jack Morris (He played HS basketball, too for Highland Park) and others through the years. I got a soft spot for him. I can’t hate him. Damn, I wish he could suceed. But, I have to admit, the case is strong for firing him once again and I’m not foolish enough to put January up against all the evidence others offer for getting rid of him.

But, I still think he could have coached the Wolves back to respectability this year if not for Big Al’s injury. It all came apart at the seams. I also don’t find much optimism in Papa Glen finding a replacement FO and Coach for next year. Here is what I see. Papa Glenn calls in McHale after the season ends and they have a little talk. He tells McHale its time and asks him to resign. McHale says no problem. The announcement is made the day after the season is over.

I don’t think Glenn fires Stack and Freddy, though. Sam Mitchell is a phone call away.

Papa G. strikes me as a small town guy who does business with people he can trust. Who he has had face to face conversations with. Duane Casey never got a chance becaue Papa G. never had a chance to get to know him. I don’t see Papa G. Doing interviews for G.M.‘s with guys from other organizations to take over. Papa G. still reembers what he inherited with Trader Jack. He’s go a working relationship with the Mayor and Stack and he’s loyal to those who are loyal to him. Mchale will go quietly away and Papa G.. will make small incremental changes. There will be no large scale overhauls of the FO and a new coach this off season, in my opinion. If you want wholesale changes, you gotta get rid of Papa G.

by Andy B on Mar 26, 2009 4:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That is the scariest

part of the whole “let’s get a new FO” proposition. But if James Dolan can do it, Glen Taylor can do it! I mean, James Dolan hired Isaiah Thomas and was insanely loyal to him for how many years (4)?

I feel like David Stern may have had an intervention with Dolan because the New York franchise is important to the league. Apparently, Stern does not feel the need to intervene in Minnesota.

All he has to do is look at Portland, Houston, San Antonio and pay someone a ton of money and give them a ton of authority. It shouldn’t be that difficult.

But, it is scary that Taylor could go out and steal Chris Wallace from the Grizzlies. Oh my god.

by littleboxes on Mar 26, 2009 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are a lot of points to respond here-

1. The argument was made that McHale never put talent around Garnett. I would disagree with this statement. The 1996-1997 Wolves had KG, Steph, and Guggs had similar ages to the OKC core this year- people go nuts about- only they won twice as many games. The 2003-2004 Wolves had Spree, Cassell, and Wally along with solid role players. If not for circumstances such as injury (Cassell-2004) or Marbury who knows what happens.

It should be noted that the expiring contract of the Original Stop N Pop was the tool used to bring Latrell Sprewell to the Wolves.

The point isn’t that McHale is Red Auerbach it is rather that he has shown in the past an ability to put capable even potentially championship level teams together.

2. The issue with McHale isn’t that he’s a proven great coach. The best possible coach we could get is probably Flip and he couldn’t do anything with the current roster. The issue is I’m not sure about making definitive judgements regarding McHale. It should be stated that before the KG trade fans had been calling for Doc Rivers head- then he gets players and turns it around. It should also be noted that D’ Antoni got fired from the Nuggets after one 14-36 season. I’m sure many people around here question the way the Wolves treated Dwane Casey.

 I wonder if McHale does show something with an offseason, training camp, and possibly 4/5 additions to the rotation (Al, Brewer, High Draft Pick, Expiring Contracts- (Collins/Williams) and other draft picks).

The other concern is that implementing new systems which players on the roster may or may not fit sets back the rebuilding again.

3. The question with the Front Office is if they have done a competent job for the last 2 years in d getting in place for this/next off-season should they be cleaned out just for the sake of it? I think it would have been more fair to clean out the front office- 2 years ago. I do question the fairness of it now if people agree the plan has been executed well.

4. As far as January goes- Stop N Pop makes points I can’t disagree with in regards to schedule. I don’t think anyone can deny their was clear improvement during this time. The big problem with the loss of Al is that it took away their by far best and most reliable offensive player. Al’s loss also took away their only real strength in rebounding advantage. Stop N Pop makes a valid point as to how much of this was attitude as opposed to coaching. I’ll just go back to my previous point in regard to if the talent at hand gives us the best opportunity to make these definitive judgements?

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 26, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

^^^ is whack

Are you Glen Taylor?

by roundhouse on Mar 26, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

now, now

We do ask that if you disagree with someone that there is something a bit more than “whack”. Jose took the time to put up a solid post and there’s plenty there to talk about.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 26, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright that's fair

He is just so extremely apologetic to McHale it weirds me out.

by roundhouse on Mar 26, 2009 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be honest...

I’d agree more with Roundhouse’s response than Jose’s post.

It was pretty “whack”, so to say.

by College Wolf on Mar 27, 2009 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's fine...

….but we frown on name calling and single word dismissals. Disagree all you want but if it’s a valid opinion (and it is) then it deserves more than a single word if you are going to disagree. If it’s way out there, offensive, or crazy, then I’ll flag it as a troll and everyone can go nuts on it. We haven’t had too many of those. They only really popped up when the Wolves played the Blazers. Jose takes the time to put in well thought out posts and he deserves more than a single word response if someone is going to disagree. That’s all we ask. Civil and respectful. One word responses start to cross the respect line unless the initial post is beyond the pale, which Jose’s is not.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 27, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough...

That’s certainly an acceptable way to do things.

by College Wolf on Mar 27, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Issue

Thier are solid points all around in this dicussion. I should clarify that my point is that I’ll be heartbroken if McHale or the Front-Office isn’t retained.

I just wish to evaluate the issues at hand in the fairest way possible. I think McHale’s track record is more difficult to evaluate than just simple platitudes as offered on Talk Radio. I also think it’s easy to dismiss the coach with the personnel shortfalls in place. The issue can easily be brought up well McHale brought in these pieces onto the team. This is true as opposed to the Dwane Casey situation. At the same time- he’s basically had to do a 180 switch of roster objectives from the KG trade- reloading (best term to us) to rebuilding. When the KG trade occured you were probably looking at a 3-4 year time frame to rebuild the roster for playoff contention barring exceptional luck (Franchise Players). I do wonder about blowing up the objective two years into with the injury circumstances that have occured. Right before there is a honest to goodness chance to actually rebuild.

As a fan seeing what has happened this year has been frustrating. I could never blame anyone for wanting to see this thing blown-up.

I think Taylor might need to make serious changes just for the sake of getting more than 4,000 people in there a night. Although I doubt hiring Ty Corbin or Dennis Lindsay is going to generate a ton of fan interest. The only way this occurs is by winning games. The only way we win games is by improving the roster. When the Front Office has generally made decent moves since the roster objective shifted I’ll ask “Is it fair to abandon their plan now?”

The issue isn’t being apologetic to Mchale when in the grand scheme of things I’ve haven’t defended every transaction or stated’ he’s for sure a “Great Coach”“. I will say he’s got a more mixed record as GM than some have you believe. I will also say that as a "Coach” I’m unsure how to judge the situation at hand. I’m also unsure if upheaval just for the sake of upheavel is the best course of action.

As far as this being “Whack” in seeking to defend McHale’s judgement would you have been calling for his head in the Springs of 1997 or 2004 if he’s incapable of building a team?
 
If this is “Whack” would you have been calling for D’Antoni’s head his year in Denver or Doc Rivers head Pre KG-Trade?
 
The issue we need to consider is that circumstances are more complicated than “McHale’s a Idiot” or “The Wolves Suck”?

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 27, 2009 9:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not Whacked

Solid points. Thanks for contributing.

I also won’t be heartbroken if McHale is not retained, but I agree it is much more complicated than the catcalls for fire Mchale. You pointing out that it is not that simple is going against the mob and that’s never easy to do. Being called whacked for defending McHale isn’t much different than being called whacked for asking why we need to invade Iraq in 2003. The mob has decided with a little encouragement from talk radio (Barriero). You can’t ask the mob to be reasonable

by Andy B on Mar 27, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not implying

that a reasonable argument cannot be made for firing Mchale S&P makes a very reasonable argument for it. He almost convinces me (perhaps he does). Just saying that responding to those who make reasonable counter arguments with “whacked” is the justification of the mob.

by Andy B on Mar 27, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the point about attendance....

…is the one that should put the most fear into PG for making a change. Keep in mind that we, the die hard fans, are the only people debating on whether or not McHale should come back or not. Everyone else probably doesn’t care or thinks he should go. Will fans come back for a winning squad? Of course, but I think they’d also give the team a quicker look without the current front office.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 27, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

With the main reason being history. Would people have been as interested in the Wolves in ‘95 if McCloskey had drafted KG and they hadn’t dealt Donyell Marshall for Googs? Part of the reason people started getting excited was because McHale was a new guy in charge and Flip was now a part of the organization.

Also, would Terry Porter and Sam Mitchell have signed as FAs with them without new leadership in place? They weren’t great free agents, yet their signings represented something new: decent free agents who wanted to come here. Even though they won 26 games that year, the scene was similar to the one in OKC now. As I’ve written before, McHale’s record is below-average by any measure, but it’s not terrible. Jack McCloskey’s was terrible. Isiah Thomas’ was terrible. With that said, he represents too many negative things with me and probably a lot of other people.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Mar 27, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the thing that really, really...

…bugs me about the entire McHale situation is that he has been the one to choose his path at the end of every year. I admire Glen’s loyalty, but that’s crazy.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 27, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point...

And, honestly, how far should loyalty carry a person? It’s not like McHale needed either of these jobs. If Taylor wanted to be loyal to him, he could put him on the broadcast team. That’s what teams like the Celtics do. If McHale is in his 70s making homerish comments like Tommy Heinsohn, I can live with that.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Mar 27, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

“If McHale is in his 70s making homerish comments like Tommy Heinsohn, I can live with that.”

- That would be awesome.

by College Wolf on Mar 27, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

PS:

Excellent talk radio reference. I always cringe when something I write aligns with something that comes out of talk radio. I know I shouldn’t, but it…well, I don’t like it. I think the change, for me, came after watching the Thunder do their thing this year. Between the Building a Winner post and this past week, I think I’ve watched more of the Thunder than the Wolves. They are going to lap this franchise because of their front office.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Mar 27, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Misspoke

My second sentence should read “that I won’t be heartbroken if McHale or the Front-Office isn’t retained.”

by Jose Cordoba on Mar 27, 2009 9:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

First, Jose Cordoba is my new favorite poster.

Second, I understand that there are people that are bitter about the past, but some of them can’t get over the past. I hear, “we’ll never go anywhere with the same front office — nothing ever changes.” That’s completely untrue.

In the past two years, the front office has changed almost our entire roster (Only Foye, Craig Smith, and Madsen have been here two years). The front office changed our direction. the front office changed the way decisions were made, to a more collective procedure. The front office changed our VP of Basketball Operations, and the front office changed our coach.

Arguments that start, “we’ll never be any good until we start to change,” go nowhere with me. I think there are people who feel very strongly about the past, and want a pound of flesh from everyone who’s ever made a move they didn’t like, and will say trumped up things like “the front office never put anyone around KG” because even if its untrue, it gets a nod from most fans. I’m more optimistic about the team’s future now than in the previous four years, and it was the front office that changed things.

by shrink on Mar 29, 2009 11:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Potential Off-season Trade Partners
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Small
All that has Kahn Before
Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Casper's 2010 Big Board and Mock Draft 3-08-2010

Recent FanPosts

Small
David Kahn v. Canis Hoopus: Open Game Thread
Small
Darko will remain a Timberwolf if...
Wolveslogo_small
Prowling the NBA - March Madness: Breaking Bracketology
Small
A Real Statistical Comparison for Jonny Flynn
Small
Omar Samhan
Small
Stumbling on Wins
Small
Because I have a half hour until my fantasy baseball draft...
Images_small
We Were Merely Freshmen

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko

    Misc:

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS

    SBNation.com Recent Stories

    San Antonio Spurs guard George Hill (3) is embraced by teammate Keith Bogans at the end of the first quarter of an NBA basketball game against the Golden State Warriors at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Friday, March 19, 2010. (AP Photo/ Bahram Mark Sobhani)

    Spurs Torch Warriors, 147-116, In Highest Scoring Game Since 1991

    ATLANTA - MARCH 19: Joe Johnson #2 of the Atlanta Hawks is congratulated by teammates after hitting the winning shot against the Charlotte Bobcats on March 19, 2010 at Philips Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Scott Cunningham/NBAE via Getty Images) +2 updates

    Hawks' Johnson Hits Game-Winning Shot Vs. Spurs, Atlanta Clinches Playoff Spot

    New Orleans Hornets forward James Posey, left, reaches in for the ball as Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony looks for a shot in the fourth quarter of the Nuggets' 93-80 victory in an NBA basketball game in Denver on Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) link

    Nuggets Rout Hornets 93-80

    More from SBNation.com >


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop