Brandon Jennings and Nikola Pekovic
With all of the hype surrounding Ricky Rubio, it's easy to forget that another trend-setting Euro League point guard has also entered his name in the 2009 NBA Draft.
As a longtime hater of the NCAA, I have a special place in my heart for the first player who bucked the system, got paid for his basketball development, and likely learned a great deal about professional ball in the process.
Unfortunately, and despite his wonderful accomplishment of challenging the NCAA status quo, Brandon Jennings has flown under the radar in terms of NBA fans in general and Wolves fans, more specifically.
If you haven't been following Jennings, you really should. He runs one of the best athlete blogs out there called When In Rome. You can read about his trips to famous tourist sites, all-time favorite point guards, earthquake relief donations, and so on and so forth. You can check out his Draft Express page here and his EuroLeague stats here.
The primary reason why Jennings has seemingly flown under the radar in the US is that his playing time and numbers haven't matched what some of his accomplished peers put up in college. The reason for this is that the EL is a different league than the NCAA and the NBA. Scoring rates, rebound rates, shooting percentages, and assist rates have a different relationship between the EL and the NBA than they do between college and the NBA. Since Jennings is the first player to come from high school to the EL, we don't exactly have a large sample size of data that would allow us to make an informed judgment about just how well the 19 year old point guard is playing in the 2nd best professional league on the planet.
Despite all of this, there have been some attempts to draw a comparison between the EL and the NBA. John Hollinger gives it a go here:
• Scoring rate decreases 25 percent
• Rebound rate increases by 18 percent (there are more missed shots in NBA play)
• Assist rate increases by 31 percent (Euro scorers are tightwads with assists)
• Shooting percentage drops by 12 percent
• Overall, PER drops by 30 percent.
Plugging Jennings' EL numbers into this formula, we get a line of 11.6 points/40 minutes, an assist rate of 27.5, a shooting percentage of 34.1, and a 9.1 PER. Again, keep in mind that we're talking about a 19 year old player in the 2nd toughest professional league on the planet.
This site has never made an attempt to rate EL prospects because we have neither the time nor resources to do so, but there are a few things we can determine about Jennings' game. First, he doesn't shoot the three well at all. He has a 26.8% fg% from beyond the arc in the EL while taking 5.2 attempts per 40 minutes. 37% of his shots are from beyond the arc. Scoring wise, he posts 0.99 points/possession while turning the ball over 0.16/possession. He has a 1.37 a/to rate with a -0.59 PPR. The problem here is that while I have a pretty good idea of what these numbers would mean in the NCAA, I have zero clue what they mean in the EL. My gut tells me the shooting numbers are worrisome. He does shoot 45.7% from 2, but the outside shooting is problematic. The Wolves already have an undersized guard with amazing quickness who can't shoot from outside.
Where Jennings may have a hand up on Bassy is that he appears to have something of a mid-range game and/or an ability to score close to the hoop. My guess is that his assist/play making numbers are pretty solid considering where he plays and the amount of time he receives on the court. That being said, I don't know and I wish I had a better way of letting you know more about his game via the stat sheet.
What I do know is that the thing that has impressed me the most about Jennings is that he has handled the entire situation with class and professionalism. Check out this passage from an ESPN article earlier this year:
"If he had gone to college, they would've babied him," says one NBA scout. "This will make him mentally tougher. And after playing for this coach, he'll know how to play the game."
Getting booted from practice proved to be a blessing for Jennings. Not only did it get his attention, his reaction won him respect in the locker room. Repesa forced him to apologize to the entire team the next morning. By the time the club returned to Rome to prep for preseason games, Jennings was diving for loose balls, pestering his man on D, fighting through screens and moving without the ball. He started pushing the rock upcourt with passes instead of fancy dribbling, nixing the urge to add to his highlight collection.
His foreign teammates started to see a player they liked on the court and enjoyed being around off of it. One day in the weight room, Jennings, not exactly a strongman on the iron, donned a wifebeater and went to work on the bench press. After completing a tough four-set session with 110 pounds, the slight 180-pounder stood tall in the middle of the room, banged his fist to his chest repeatedly and let out a primal scream: "With the heart! With the heart!"
Glancing at one another, his teammates smiled knowingly. "That meant a lot to us," said Rodrigo De La Fuente, Jennings' roommate in Folgaria. "Because he's the point guard, if he leads us by playing with heart, guys will follow that."
And this little ditty from a recent NY Times article:
“I have definitely improved as a player and a person,” Jennings said. “My family and I have had a really unique experience because of this decision, and I do believe it will advance my career in professional basketball.”
Two N.B.A. executives, who could not speak on the record because they would be fined by the N.B.A., said Jennings’s stock had not been hurt by the move.
One executive said many of the challenges Jennings faced — not being a star, riding the bench, dealing with older teammates — made him better prepared for his rookie year than if he had starred in college.
“You put a kid in a different culture and country, he has no choice but to grow up,” the executive said. “I like that. It shocks the system when you don’t get spoiled or coddled, and it’s humbling.”
Indeed. The young man deserves nothing but respect for the way he has handled this entire situation. Respect.
Getting around to the Wolves and Jennings, I wish I had a way to place him on our draft board. I simply don't know enough about the EL to have an idea about where to put him. That being said, I'm pretty sure the Wolves could do a lot worse. The guy appears to be a very hard worker with solid point skills, leadership qualities, and game to boot. Here's hoping the Wolves have a solid European scouting operation. Here's hoping that Jennings inspires more and more high school students to get paid becoming professional ballers rather than get used lining the pockets of hypocritical NCAA leaders.
Moving along to the Wolves' other EL interest, check out this post from The Painted Area that prominently mentions Nikola Pekovic:
Pekovic, a rugged 6-11 F/C, was considered to be a mid-first round talent, but fell to Minnesota at #31 (the first pick of the second round) due to contract issues - he is not expected to make his way to the NBA until 2010-11. Considering the relative strengths of the 2008 and 2009 drafts, it's not a stretch to say that Pekovic could be a top 5 pick in this year's draft, though his upside is reduced now that he is 23 years old.
We've caught Pekovic a couple times on the Euroleague Game of the Week on NBA TV and have been impressed. It's a little jarring at first because he sort of resembles a guy like Peja Drobnjak physically, but he is really quite mobile and skilled, with good hands, touch and length, even if he is not the most athletic guy, per se.
...
Pekovic has averaged 13 points and 3.9 rebounds on .636 FG% in just 18.2 minutes per game in Euroleague play, impressive per-36 minute numbers of about 26 and 8.
...
Using [Hollinger's formula], Pekovic's per-40 minute numbers for the NBA look like this: 21.5 pts, 10.1 reb, .560 FG%
His 2007-08 stats translated to this: 18.3 pts, 12.0 reb, .514 FG%. Not bad.
All in all, Pekovic looks like a guy who's a pretty skilled and efficient scorer and rebounder, but not terribly strong on the defensive end. Potentially good news and bad news for Wolves fans, as you can never have enough skilled bigs, but those strengths and weaknesses sound an awful lot like those of Mssrs. Jefferson and Love - Minny could potentially be looking at a lot of 120-115 games in its 2010s.
It will be very interesting to see how Pekovic plays into the Wolves' future plans. If they do plan on keeping him, I think you can pencil in a guard with this year's top pick....a guard like Brandon Jennings.
Until later.
BTW: Pekovic is playing in the EL Final Four. You can click here for the schedule. You can buy a Final Four pass for just over 25 Euro. I highly recommend the EL's pay-for-view product. It's fantastic. It's everything NBA League Pass should be but isn't.
0 recs |
44 comments
|
Comments
Interesting post..
If we end up with #5 or 6, Jennings might be the guy. Like most of the guys after #2, I’d guess it’ll depend heavily on the pre-draft workouts. I think BJ was the #1 rated high schooler in 2008.
by Andy G on May 1, 2009 7:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I love that...
take on the experience he’s gained. He really gets off the ground when jumps. It seems like the guys who do something first tend to be the real deal. KG skipping college, and I believe Barry Sanders was one of the first to skip senior year in college.
by Pants_ on May 1, 2009 8:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jennings
Kudos for consistently coming up with interesting notes during such a dry time for us Wolves fans.
Re: Jennings, this kid has to be the biggest enigma in the draft. On one hand you’ve got a slight PG with streetball skills and some red flags in the way of questionable shot selection and a low bball IQ (from what I’ve read/heard from those who watch a lot of Euro ball), but on the other hand you’ve got a kid who apparently has a great attitude and work ethic, unquestionable skills and serious athleticism. Just like you mentioned SnP, I’ve been seriously impressed with what I’ve read from and about him, especially his recent $50,000 donation to the earthquake relief fund (big change for a 19 year old!).
I do have to say that if his biggest issues really are shot selection, and fundamental issues like how to run/defend ball screen plays and when to make the simple play vs. the flashy one, then having a great work ethic and attitude can go a long way towards improving those weaknesses. One thing to note, as well, when looking at his Euro stats is that he apparently spends a lot of time playing off the ball on Roma because he’s not great at running their system and they have more experienced vets. I’ve only seen him in one game on NBATV, but this was very noticeable, and might contribute to his shooting percentages. In the NBA he’s not likely to be spotting up from deep and playing off the ball.. So yeah, I agree 100% with the hope that the Wolves take their Euro scouting seriously. I know we’re all probalby a bit leery of blazing fast, slight-framed PG’s, but if Jennings can finish at the rim and appears to be better suited to running an NBA offense than one in Europe (which is very likely), he could be seriously good.
Oh, and Pek is a tank. In the game I caught on NBATV (the fact that they play Euro league games is sweet, btw.) he single-handedly demolished the opposing team. It seemed like he scored 18-20 pts in about as many minutes. He’s pretty much a bull in a china shop in the paint, always rolling to the hoop HARD and looking to score. Looks a solid 6’11 (or so) with muscles to spare.
by Xand1 on May 1, 2009 8:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
solid stuff..
…i also found a quote from his old oak hill academy coach who said that his team was better without jennings than with him. it was said in kind of a condescending way. i’ll try to find it. that being said, i think jennings has really shown that he is willing to be a professional and that deserves recognition and respect.
i think the big question with him is can he get by people in the nba, run the pick and roll, and finish from mid-range in? he looks like he’d be pretty tough to keep in front of and if that’s the case, then he’ll have a nice run in the nba.
i also caught 2 games with pekovic and second everything written about him. he is most definitely a tank. he looks like he wants to bang heads at all times.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be fun to pair Pekovic on the floor
with James Johnson. I’m guessing if the Wolves made the playoffs with those two, other teams would be a wee bit hesitant to get into a battle of “hard fouls.”
by PoorDick on May 1, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is just secondhand info from guys over on RealGM who watch a lot more Eurob all than I do, but I read quite a bit about how Jennings’ minutes were limited ealry on because he had no clue how to run or defend the pick and roll. It sounds like his game had very much of a flashy, drive and dish streetball type of quality to it, which really doesn’t fly in Europe, hence his being relegated to playing a lot of his minutes off the ball. Those are definitely big issues, and would probably explain his coach’s comment. That said, like I mention above, he seems to have a good head on his shoulders and all the stuff about his team loving him bodes well for his prospects in my eyes. If there was a place to learn discipline, fundamentals and how to fit into a team, a competitive European team is the place to do it.
I really wish we had something translateable to go off of as far as his play goes, but I can’t help but wonder if he’ll surprise people next year. Definitely a gamble and a dark horse that could make a team look either very stupid of very smart on draft night. From what I’ve seen of his handle and speed I have no doubts he’ll be able to get by his man in the NBA. The question is if he’ll know what to do once he does. Still, we could do worse and I won’t be too disappointed if he winds up a Wolf.
by Xand1 on May 1, 2009 9:49 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Risky
1. No one can deny Jennings is talented especially when it comes to Speed and Handle.
2. It should be noted that Tony Parker and Rajon Rondo have both greatly improved thier shooting since they came into the league. The differences being Rondo had other strengths that augmented him being on the floor (D/Rebounding/PG Skills) and Parker wasn’t stepping onto a Lottery Team.
I imagine next year- he probably wouldn’t see a lot of minutes for this reason. Thieris also the troubling issue of his last two-levels of play expressing concern with how he ran the offense. This is saying nothing about defensive skills. So you have three concerns right there to invest in Jennings at 5-6. Xand1 is right in picking him at 5 could make you a genius. I just see his skill-set as more of a risk than even than Derozan or Evans at this point in time.
3. If the Wolves claim to be on a three year plan as has been stated- this doesn’t seem like the type of pick to make. I think the time-frame that is probably more realisitic to compete in the playoffs at 5 years using the time frame established by the Trail Blazers from the time of the Rasheed Trade until this season.
by Jose Cordoba on May 1, 2009 10:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rondo also has the advantage...
…in hip checking, body tossing, and face raking. I wonder how far he can go before a suspension. My guess is that he could murder a ball boy at this point and still be allowed to play in game 7. Not that I’m complaining. I like the guy and think he’s a fantastic player but at some point, you have to say enough’s enough.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually dislike Jennings a bit, but an important thing to note when considering chemistry. He was an AAU teammate of Kevin Love.
by revprodeji on May 1, 2009 12:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i think he also played some high school ball..
…with derozan. i wonder if love and jennings’ aau team played against the one with eric gordon and derrick rose in the back court.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thoughts...
I see that you’re a big fan of Brandon Jennings going to Europe and skipping the NCAA’s altogether, but I’m wondering what you think his draft status would be if he had instead stayed in the USA and played in the D-League?
Blogging at RidiculousUpside
by Scott Schroeder on May 1, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know. On one hand, I think it would be lower...
…because of the reasons cited in the ESPN article. If you go back and read some of the things he was saying about his decision between Tim Floyd and USC and Lute Olsen and Arizona, it was clear that Lute told him that he could “be himself” at Arizona while Floyd probably told him he would have to d it up, muck it up, and slow it down. I imagine he would have gone to Arizona, saw the program and season start to fall apart and would have gone for his own.
On the other hand, how far off is he from Jerryd Bayless? Bayless got his at Arizona in pretty much the same way I’d imagine Bayless doing it. He followed it up with a year on the bench in the NBA. In a draft this weak, someone would have bit on this type of player regardless of any coaching/professional issues.
I think it could go either way. If I had to pick, I’d say he is simply better off having gone to Europe while showing NBA teams in a weak draft that he can be a professional, malleable in terms of what system he plays in, and someone open to coaching. Without it, I think he walks the Bayless dandy route.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
whoops..
….that second sentence in the second paragraph should read "Bayless got his at Arizona in pretty much the same way I’d imagine Jennings doing it (sans Europe).
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FTA's
Shooting is shooting, so to me there is no Euro premium or discount that can be applied. He can’t shoot the long-range ball. What’s even more concerning is the fact he kept taking those shots despite proving he can’t make them. No player in their right mind should shoot three pointers at a regular pace if they are that poor at it. So that’s one red flag. The other is the lack of FTA’s. For a guy with such quicks and handles, I would have expected him to get to the line more. So I am definitely a big no on Brandon Jennings.
It’s all good with Pekovic. Whether he plays for us or not, his value continues to increase as an asset. Hopefully he has another great year next season and then commits to coming over, either to play for us or to be traded by us to another team in exchange for a more complimentary player (Pekovic for Noah anyone?).
by Rascal Flatts on May 1, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jennings
I think at the very least it probably points to poor shot-selection. Although it should be noted that Josh Childress’s shooting PCT has taken a drop in Euro League from 57 to 46 percent. So part of this has to be related to Defensive style over their also.
This blog entry from Basketball-Statistics.com sheds further light into the difference between the Two Leagues.
http://basketball-statistics.com/howdoeuroleaguestatisticstranslatetothenba.html
Here he notes the difference between the two-leagues in Free Throw Attempts for a given player has a pretty wide variance. This could be the case with Jennings.
Although I do agree with your conclusion as to whether we should draft him.
by Jose Cordoba on May 1, 2009 1:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
All Right, hes on the radar
but, still, we are sitting at five and Rubio and Griffine are off the board. Who do the Wolves take if they want to fill a guard spot?
Curry, Harden, Evans or Jennings. Gawd I hate the draft position the Wolves always find themselves in. I’ll tell you what. It don’t matter if it is McHale making the pick Stack, Hoiberg or any new GM Taylor decides to hand the team over, too, if the WOlves are stuck at 5 and cannot manage to move up to one or two, then the curse is still on. If they pick Curry, then Harden, Evans or Jennings turns into a star and while Curry tantalizes but never quite pans out. If they pick Jennings, then Curry turns into a star while Jennings kind of slowly rots away in the northern hinterlands. Regradless, whomever the Wolves pick will sit out the second year with a season long injury. Hate to say it, but KLove’s got to take his turn in 09-10. Same thing if we pick Harden or Evans. We are damned either way.
The only way out is a GM who figures out a trade that moves up to get Rubio at 2 or else to bring in some veterans, so we don’t have to rely on the lott pick at 5. That’s the only way to break the curse.
by Andy B on May 1, 2009 1:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
not the only way out...
If we select a GM who knows how to scout or run a scouting division then presumably you can sit at #5 and get the right guy.
I would be shocked if out of Evans/Curry/Harden/DeRozan/Jennings there isn’t a star guard.
by Pants_ on May 1, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s funny that this such a foreign concept to us that most of us won’t believe it until we see it happen.
by Xand1 on May 1, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely, one of them will be a star gaurd
Just no the one the Wolves pick.
That is the curse. There is no scouting that can tell you who the star will be. At this point it is drawing straws and the WOlves will inevitably draw the short one.
by Andy B on May 1, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want them...
…to trade up for Rubio. I don’t think he’ll ever live up to what a lot of people think of him. I think they can get the same thing with Calathes at 18. Rubio worries me more than Evans. He’s an absolute NBA unknown.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ugh...
There is no sure thing, then. The Wolves have to rely on luck and if Hoiberg’s Teddy Bear isn’t going to do it, then what will?
I know nothing about Rubio, but aren’t they all “NBA unknowns” at this point.
Even Griffin. Doesn’t he sound an awful lot like Beasley last year. He made the 1st team all rookie team, but we all know that was a gift. Griffin, like Oden, will probably never live up to what people think of him either.
by Andy B on May 1, 2009 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they are all unknowns...
….in the sense that nobody has played in the league, but at least with the college players you have years and years of similar performances you can look back on and have a more educated guess about how a player’s game will transfer to the next level. With Rubio, that’s simply not there. I’m working on a post about Calathes. I think I’ll call it The American Rubio.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps,
And, don’t get me wrong, I love the speculation and the analysis during the offseason and for the upcoming draft. For a Wolve’s fan, you have to pretty much accept that this is the True high point of the year based on past experiences. From the beginning of the season and on, its downhill and it doesn’t start coming back around until we start speculating on the draft and how the roster will look for the upcoming year.
But, still, regardless of the years and years, I still think its pretty much a crap shoot. whether you rely on statistics and draft based on needs or BPA, it don’t matter. What you need is luck on your side. Great college players are not always great NBA players and good players in college with obvious weaknesses, sometimes end up being damn good NBA players. And then there are the unknowns like injuries.
either way, I can’t wait to read the post on “the American Rubio,” since I know so little about him either. My gut, and anyone who would trust my gut for making a draft pick might wish for a severe case of the swine flu, tells me that we should take Curry with the 5th pick. But, given the amount of time I have put into evaluations (basically, I just read Canis), I’d say I have as much expertise on the draft pick as I do on who will win the Kentucky Derby.
by Andy B on May 1, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a stretch
There is a reason Rubio has been the automatic #1 or #2 guy on DX’s mock since last season (when he was 17!). I highly respect Givony and the work he does. These guys are about as money as you can get in the fickle world of predicting prospects’ careers. I’d be willing to go all in for Rubio. The guy is already a world class passer and ball hawk. Instincts like the ones he has translate.
by Rascal Flatts on May 1, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
do they?
and when was the last time someone like that translated? non-athletic, poor shooting teenage point guard. that’s the other side of the rubio coin. i want to believe but he’s still pretty unknown and for every givony, i’ve read gm quotes about him being a euro bassy or a slow white guy. i just think he’s more of a risk than people are giving him credit for…especially with the #2 pick.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically
Chad Ford was saying the other day that a few NBA GMs are concerned that Griffin is closer to 6-6 than 6-10.
Ladies and Gentlemen—Your 2009 NBA Rookie Class!
by PoorDick on May 1, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
god these heights are hilarious
So Griffin is probably similar in size to Beasley. JVG was saying Paul Millsap is 6’6’’ (listed at 6’8’’).
by Pants_ on May 2, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pekovic is playing right now 3PM ET/12 PT
You can also get the game on ESPN360.com if you have access there for free.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
here:
http://atdhe.net/6676/watch-olympiacos-vs-panathinaikos
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strong game for Pekovic
He and Batiste dominate the boards but give up easy baskets to driving players for Olympiakos (vet Lynn Greer).
Pekovic fights, but his opponent Vujacic plays horrible tonight. I still think you got yourself a Darko Milicic clone :)
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least..
….Darko can play D. Pekovic seems to be just rebounding and putbacks. I’d take Darko at this point just for the defense at the 4/5 (compared to Pekovic).
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I think Darko is better and Pekovic is not young enough to massively improve. It's just a comparison of style and origin
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW:
Welcome to the off season ;)
I’d be willing to bet that even with the new GM on the Wolves, your favorite squad will have a more active off season than mine.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your off-season will still be very interesting to see if the organization sets things in the right direction and brings fresh ideas
I feared you might take away our assistant GM Tom Penn who is very good managing the cap (Pritchard has said it’s one of his goals to spin out his guys similar to what he got from the Spurs). But apparently there are no talks in this direction.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very nice game, although your guy doesn't get much burn in the second half
Jasikevicius is a nice player and a real character. Too bad he didn’t stick in the NBA.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 3:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it was an excellent game..
….Pekovic came on in the end.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW:
I’m not sure how it happened, but I think Oden fouled Pekovic late in the 3rd. ;)
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 1, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lol, I'm a bit disappointed "Baby Shaq" Shortsanitis didn't play
My announcers commented he showed up for the last training camp 50 pounds overweight :)
Pekovic made a big FT and score in the end, even though his last try rolled out. We will see if the Wolves try to bring him over.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jennings
it would have been nice if he went to college to make comparing him easier. i havent been able to watch any games of him in europe but from what ive seen from high school videos hes probably the most creative player ive seen. i wouldnt mind the wolves drafting him because it doesnt seems like many/any of these guys are proven and the wolves are just gonna have to draft on mostly potential more than the actual best player the one advantage with jennings is he has played pro so maybe he would be able to adjust to the NBA sooner. i just hope when he comes here he doesnt play like a euro
by Gophers12 on May 2, 2009 6:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
NIce write up SnP
Surely gives some extra things to roll about in the noodle if the Kings don’t end up getting a top 2 spot. (And, everything you say makes me wonder how Rubio came about his assists so easily. Is his passing that great, or is he simply the beneficiary of nice scorekeepers?)
I do find it interesting that there is a slight discrepancy between Jennings numbers on DX and through the EuroLeague. I wonder why.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on May 3, 2009 9:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know why there would be a difference...
…I’ll email to see if I can get an answer.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on May 3, 2009 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be appreciated
Because somebody’s numbers are wrong.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on May 5, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Very good reading, SnP…despite having zero rooting interest in the Wolves I always enjoy the work you and Wyn do over here.
I’m similarly intrigued by Jennings but I really have no idea what to make of him…I’m just hoping the Bucks’ scouting staff does :)
by Frank Madden on May 7, 2009 12:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














