Mitchell, a Discussion

I had originally planned this as the next post in the Everything You Think You Know About the Wolves Is Wrong series but in between putting on a new roof, installing 1/2 of a new furnace pipe system, having my eldest daughter's swim club change up her training hours (which provide the vast majority of my internets time), and finding out that I will be a father for the third time (which has vastly expanded my Honey-Do list) I haven't had much time of late to put in the type of research that a post in that series deserves. Plus, it's looking more and more like the Wolves will simply roll with Kevin McHale at the head of the bench so this may be a moot debate from the get-go.
Opening up the discussion, I would first like to offer a sincere apology to Darren Wolfson for his inclusion in a post about the local media meme of the need for David Kahn to fire McHale and bring in Sam Mitchell. Mr. Wolfson is not in the league of villains that I lumped him in with and I was reminded/reprimanded by several readers that he did not deserve such crass treatment from yours truly. Agreed. I will offer no justifications or qualifiers for my take. It was an unclassy and uncalled attack on Mr. Wolfson and I thank those of you who called me on the BS. This site does not have any editors and, outside of our own judgment, we depend on your input to keep things on the level. Thank you for that.
Getting back to Mitchell, let me also say that my opposition to him being hired as a coach comes at a considerable cost to my Wolves fandom, as he is my all-time favorite Wolf, bar-none. There are also some solid non-homerish reasons for wanting him to come back to the Target Center. Darren lays them out in a post that you can read here.
Realizing full-well that the following argument should have a lot more attached to it in terms of back-up, here are the four main reasons why I think Mitchell would work out for the Wolves about as well as a painting with an incorrectly spelled jersey:
- The Raptors really did not improve under his watch. His tenure is marked by ups and downs in both record and OE/DE. He may have been partially done in by bad front office shopping, but that was the case throughout his time with the team. Go take a look at the Rob Babcock-aided rosters during each of his years in Toronto. The bad shopping was always there. Guess what, the shopping here has been even worse! With McHale, I think there is something approaching cosmic justice to having the guy who brought the bacon home for so long having to put on an apron in order to prove that it's not just the cooking that was wrong. I think it is even more interesting that he may be saddled down with his very own head-coach-in-waiting a'la Witt to his Casey.
- Having a poor (and young) team led him to make some pretty short-term decisions about his squad. For instance, Mitchell clearly equated good play with solid jump shooting and this led the Raptors, under his watch, to have a substantial decline in FTAs during each consecutive season (2101 in his 1st season, 1658 in his last full year) as well as seeing a large decrease in the number of three point attempts. In other words, safe mid-range jump shots became preferable to threes and forays into the lane because those shots have much more potential to bring down your shooting percentage. This is not a winning recipe for the modern NBA. It is also not a good fit for the Wolves' roster, both in its current form and the Orlando-esque inside/out model that Kahn has hinted at. 3s and getting to the line are 2 of the most important parts of the modern NBA game and Mitchell has shown that he can deliver neither.
- His in-game management is not better than Kevin McHale's. This is where I wish I had more time to flesh out my argument. You can take this point with a grain of salt as it is pretty subjective. Keeping this ball rolling, I know there is more to being an NBA coach than this (media, community relations, lots and lots of time) and that you can hire assistants to help with the in-game stuff, but I think McHale has one thing Mitchell does not: the potential to be an upper-level ego manager, which is hopefully something that a Minnesota basketball team will have to worry about somewhere down the line. This brings us to point #4:
- His players may not have liked/trusted him. Former #1 pick Andrea Bargnani took a swipe at Mitchell earlier this year and his comments are probably analogous to what Wolves players felt about Randy Wittman during the dark days of early December. In terms of temperament, wouldn't Mitchell be more along the lines of Witt than any other coaching prospect out there? Even if you don't buy the players-not-liking-him bit, the Raptors signed his replacement to a 3 year deal and players were saying things about him that Wolves players are saying about McHale (i.e. keep him). Darren mentions that Mitchell had a better record than Jay Triano but the Raptors finished the season with a 9-4 run (their very own January) and some encouraging signs from their core players. The guy didn't get a 3 year deal for nothing.
Is Mitchell a solid option for the Wolves? He was a wonderful player for the squad and he apparently was a good quote for the local media. The question here is this: Does he fit the Wolves vision and does he do so better than Kevin McHale? I say absolutely not. What say you?
0 recs |
39 comments
|
Comments
I have no real interest in Sam Mitchell either
though ultimately, whether McHale is any better is debatable. Frankly, my main concern with McHale is that I don’t think he really has a passion to be a coach.
I dunno. How do we even evaluate coaches? It isn’t an easy thing to do, except at the extremes. There are a few guys who consistently get a lot out of their teams: Jackson, Sloan, Popovich. There are probably guys who consistently do less with more, though they don’t stay around long. Other than that, what can you say?
Most guys aren’t probably going to do a lot one way or another to drive their teams to winning or losing. The choice seems to me to get a guy who isn’t going to actively hurt your chances, and maybe helps develop some players, or roll the dice on a young coach who maybe you get lucky with and he’s the next really good one.
Here’s what I don’t get. I’ve lived in a bunch of different places in this country in my years. The mania in the upper midwest, especially Minnesota, for the local is unbelievable. (I’m in WI now, and it’s here too, though not as extreme).
I mean, really. Gotta have McHale—he’s a Gopher! He’s an iron ranger! Sam Mitchell—he was a Wolf, get him back! Get Bobby Jackson! What about Rick Rickert!?
The Twins just got done with their draft; it was incredible how many fans were screaming for them to draft Gophers, And the did, as well as a couple of other yokels.
Local ties are always a story anywhere in the country, but I’ve never seen it like it is in Minnesota. It’s so freaking parochial. Newsflash: people from Minnesota, and people with Minnesota ties, aren’t any better than people without.
Except Joe Mauer.
by Eric in Madison on Jun 15, 2009 9:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed..
….on the clamoring for yokels. Most of my adult life has been out of the state and in places like Texas, Oklahoma, California, and Nebraska. I can’t remember ever seeing the “he’s one of us” angle as much as it is pronounced here. I also think Minny sports fans get too hung up on guys who “play the right way” or “are good in the locker room”. Too often, this are code words for bad players.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow...
…i broke out the “this are” for that last comment. awesome. stupid no-coffee mornings.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the "play the game the right way" thing
is bizarre. It almost seems like it’s become a moral thing among a certain segment of the MN sports fan base. I see it with Twins fans all the time—there’s something “better” about being a scrappy (white?) team that hustles and gets down the sac bunt then, you know, actually being talented.
Ultimately, part of me wants McHale gone for exactly the local reason. Can we please expand our horizons a bit? I know this isn’t the most attractive landing spot (see the GM search), but really…maybe someone from a different state would be a possibility?
by Eric in Madison on Jun 15, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chalk it up to
The scandinavian roots of a lot of the culture here—work hard, keep your mouth shut, don’t complain, help others when they need it b/c it’s the right thing to do. Those are the classic old school MN values, and while I think you see less of them today (unless you’re more outstate), they still form the predominant meme that most of the sports guys (writers and coaches) frame all their opinions in.
What’s funny to me is that the dominant franchise in town (the Vikes) take the token Gopher every few years and put them on the practice squad, but otherwise is always bringing in outside talent. Purple Jesus? People love him. The Williams Wall and JA? Same thing. Or look at the Twins. They do take some local guys, but that’s easier when you have a 50 round draft every year (or whatever it is). A lot of their guys aren’t from here either—Cuddyer’s from the east coast, but he might as well be from Bloomington. Morneau’s from Canada, which I suppose is close enough, but Baker, Liriano, Gomez, and names people know aren’t from here. And you can’t really argue with the Twin’s success for wanting to stay in-house. To end this long ramble, I’ll just say that my theory is that MN sports fans favor and support guys that go out and play hard and keep trying, no matter what. That’s been a hallmark of the Twins the last 8-10 years and is why people still cheer Punto “doing the little things” at the Dome (and why people can be so negative about Delmon). It’s why (despite what you initially might think) people loved (and still love) Randy Moss and now AD and JA, because they kept trying (Moss maybe not on every play, but those that he did were spectacular and more frequent than the ones he took off). It’s why people here love KG, Love, Big Al, and Gomes, and why they love Sam Mitchell. In those bleak years and the early KG years, Sam Mitchell and Terry Porter where the attitude and glue that helped shape KG in the player he is, and every Wolves fan knew it and loved watching those two vets compete. I’m sure that’s what everyone has in mind now that Sam is an HC candidate.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 15, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Three Kids?!!!!!
There goes the blog… Congrats, SNP!
by BDavige on Jun 15, 2009 10:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
There will definitely have to be some changes made on the site. I’m also plotting a career change that will involve going back to school for something a bit less soul sucking than what I have been trained to do. That being said, it will all depend on my daughter’s swim club times. Early morning practice with wi-fi = lots of internets time. That’s where I get all my posting done. The rest is just checking up on comments in between whatever. We’ll see what happens.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Breakfast with Kahn this morning
Hi everyone….I appreciate Nate’s love with the links to my blog….and thoroughly enjoy the passion on this site….so will start posting with some regularity….was fortunate enough to have breakfast with Kahn this morning….came up with these conclusions….some may be a repeat of previous season-ticket holder gatherings.
1) There will be a significant roster overhaul by the start of the ‘10-’11 season…I would guess at least 7 new players, if not more, so any talk of the current bunch liking McHale is a waste, considering many of these guys won’t be here soon enough…and any talk of the current roster set-up not being favorable for Mitchell is a stretch as well.
2) There is not a full-fledged coaching search….he will decide on McHale first without talking to other candidates, and if in the end, he decides McHale isn’t the right fit, then will go about with a coaching search….says he has no one in mind at this time.
3) He likes Thabeet, but said on the record to me, he has not talked to Memphis at all….but, with 7 media people in the room, hard to know if that’s really the case.
4) Curry is a PG, Evans, he’s not sure on….there is debate in the front office over Evans’ future, is it at the 1 or the 2? and if it’s at the 2, does he shoot it well enough to merit a high pick (likely not)? As of today, Curry is out for Friday’s workout.
5) Thinks there are 7 legit draft prospects, so believes at 6, if they stay there, that he will end up with an impactful player
6) if at 6 they get a PG, say Curry, at 18 they won’t draft, say Maynor, even if Maynor is higher on their board than someone else…could draft same position at 6 an 18 at a different spot, but specifically with PGs, won’t take two at 6 & 18.
7) made mention of needing to upgrade the facilities…a more team-centric environment, more photos of the guys, etc….
8) Jefferson has lost weight, will be ready to go by Day 1 of camp…might be limited in two-a-days, but when opening night comes, he most definitely will be good to go
That is what I remember off the top of my head….will add to later if I missed something from my notes.
by DarrenDoogie on Jun 15, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent..
…thank you very much for the info. I think the facility upgrade is a must. Stuff like that matters when building a winning franchise. Look at what Cleveland did with their new facility. The Wolves are very outdated on this front.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post
It gets me wondering if the Hoopus community should be more focused on who’ll be dealt and who’ll be kept than trying to necessarily figure out the best starting rotations, draft picks, etc.
Here’s my very quick first take over who will be here in 16 months time.
(For reference, the Wolves have 11 players—including Brown—under contract for next year):
Probably kept (4-5):
Draft picks from this year (1-2)
Big Al
Sheldon
Brewer
Bassy
Probably dealt (8):
Mike Miller
Brian Cardinal
Pekovic
Maddog
Rhino
Foye
Brown
a draft pick
Not resigned this year (2):
Jason Collins
Carney (although he might be kept for another season)
Just don’t know (2):
Love
Gomes
The two toughest are Love and Gomes, as both are young, productive and reasonably priced, but both might also be used as the final sweeteners needed to pull off a big deal. I’d hate to lose both, but especially Love. I think Foye has a decent chance to last through this year and be traded during the next season. Brewer will be given a chance to generate a track record with his biggest assets being that he’s still young, reasonably priced, and plays perimeter defense on a team without good perimeter d. I think Bassy stays as capable, steady backup PG but Rhino leaves/is dealt. I think Miller is gone unless he shows up as the scorer he used to be. Still, though, his contract is just too valuable in this economy and is a major bargaining chip for getting more talent. Somebody will look at the Magic this year and say “That could be us and Pekovic” and offer a future first rounder. I think Sheldon is like Carney in that, in lieu of somebody else, if the asking price is right they’ll be back for another year as roster filler, although they could just as easily be let loose.
Agreements? Other takes?
Discuss.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 15, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love...
….is certainly the best player that has redundancy on the roster in a traditional sense and would be of great value to another team. As much as I really, really like the guy and think they would be stupid to move him because I love the idea of completing the small ball vision with Curry, but I get how he could be moved for someone like Thabeet while still maintaining the #6 pick for a point….or even a broader deal that moved him for a “real” center + a real 3 along with the 6th pick. Right now, Love and the 6th pick are their most valuable assets. After the draft, and during the season, the 20+ mil in expiring contracts + Pekovic are the most valuable assets.
What do you guys think about something like this?
To Memphis:
- Love
- #6
- possible inclusion of #18
To Minnesota:
- Gay
- #2 pick
They then wait until the season to use the expiring contracts with a team like Charlotte (Felton), Utah (Kirilenko), New Jersey (Carter), or…well, you get the picture. They bring in higher priced talent that will hopefully be for sale at that point.
I just think that Love and the 6th pick are going to be asked for and needed if they want to move up. Personally, I’d be upset if this happen but I get the reasoning. It would definitely be a swing for the fences with a guy like Thabeet.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabeet = no
I don’t think they move Love or the #6 for Thabeet. In fact, I don’t see them moving up in the draft at all unless they get blown away by the offer, or if there’s two guys they want and they get Washington’s or Sacto’s pick without losing #6.
My guess is that enough of the holdover FO guys are high enough on Love that he’ll make it through this draft without getting traded, unless the Wolves are blown away. While he may have some redundant skills, he’s also the proto-type player Kahn has said that he’s looking for—a cheap young player under team control for a number of years who produces beyond what they’re paid. In terms of drafting Thabeet, I just don’t think anyone’s convinced that Thabeet will be as good a rebounder as Love, or as good of a scorer. Who do you think posts a higher +/- next year?
In regards to the proposed Memphis trade, unless they’re drafting Harden I don’t think they’re high enough on any one player to make the swap. The most I could see them doing is offering Love and 18 for Gay (or someone else), but not swapping 2 and 6. I don’t know, Kahn just strikes me as the kind of guy who’s more likely to trade down and accumulate players or future picks than he is to trade up. I do think your analysis of which assets have the most value when is spot on, though.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 15, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not crazy about the deal...
Because of Rudy Gay. He’s good, but it’s not clear whether he’s good because he plays on a bad team or because he’s really talented.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 15, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is insanely talented – absolutely prototypical freakish physical stats: 6’8, 7’+ wingspan, 40 inch vert etc. but apparently very frustrating as well. I haven’t done too much research on the guy, but I distinctly remember there being a very negative tenor regarding Gay on Grizzle forums I’ve read in the past. I think the same issues that surrounded him pre-draft are rearing their ugly heads: lack of committment to D, poor shot selection, on/off motor etc. The only things that can kill a guy with that type of talent, basically. He’s young enough to improve, but could there be anything more frustrating to watch than a guy with those abilities who doesn’t commit himself defensively or posses the BBIQ to be more than a 1 on 1 scorer? He’s got the talent to be a top 5 defensive wing in the league if he wanted, but I’ve never heard anyone mention him in a positive light on that side of the floor, which is very worrisome.
by Xand1 on Jun 15, 2009 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and I remember the Grizz fans seemed to be much more enthusiastic about the prospects of moving Gay than they should have been. I think they see Mayo as the future leader of the team and have been fairly underwhelmed with Rudy.
by Xand1 on Jun 15, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been out of town
But this suggestion calls for a response. I’d make this trade the day after never. Why do I want Rudy Gay’s overpaid mid-range game for the next several years- even if he leaves after this season. He’s an average NBA 3 at best for the reasons that were mentioned by Xand. So I would never trade 6 and 18 for him. As far as Kevin Love for Thabeet (This is even more of a stretch). To trade an elite NBA Rebounder who gets to the line at a awesome rate at his age seems like a huge stretch. People always complain- He gets shots blocked (Well this is what happens when you attack the rim) would they rather he just make 2 out of 5 jumpers.
As far as Thabeet- On the Offensive End- he’d just crowd Jefferson in the post. On the Defense end- he’s long but for reasons mentioned on this site numerous times- their are still questions about how elite he’ll be on this side of the ball on the NBA level.
by Jose Cordoba on Jun 15, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm like Stop-n-pop: Mitchell is my fave wolf...but...
I also think he’d be a bad fit for this organization. I’d much rather keep McHale than go that route.
Whats making me say “Hmmmm” a bit is the recent talk about Lambeer. He’s had a ton of sucess in the WNBA. Not the NBA, I know, but I think if your a good coach your a good coach. He might be worth a look.
by kingsxman on Jun 15, 2009 12:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the Lambeer idea.
If we hire Lambeer, somebody’s gotta dig up the old clip from Cheers where Gary tricks the gang into thinking they’re responsible for breaking Kevin McHale’s ankle, and they see the X-rays of the break and everything. (I’ll paraphrase the dialogue)
All is revealed when McHale walks into Cheers and is walking just fine. “But what about this X-ray?” they ask.
McHale looks at it and reads the label. “Adult male gorilla. It’s not my foot. Maybe Lambeer?”
by princelyfrank on Jun 15, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We had it here on the site..
….a while back. I’ll try to find it. Sam brought McHale in for the bar league team.
I also like the Laimbeer idea. The guy has been a good coach in the NBA and the thought of him and McHale working together really adds to the karmic payback this team needs to make. If only there were a way to get Rambis on the bench too.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if that last post was sufficiently...
…dry enough. ;) BTW: Does anyone know if McHale and Laimbeer are friendly enough to do something like this? I came of age basketball-wise during the late 80s and the thought of this kind of blows my mind.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think McHale would refuse...
Because of his Celtic pride. There was an incident in the ‘87 playoffs where Laimbeer got away with a cheap shot and then Parish hit him in the next game. If McHale wouldn’t trade Gugliotta/Peeler to the Lakers for Elden Campbell/Eddie Jones, it’s hard to see him working with any rival.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 15, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Congrats, SnP!
Way to go, Big Daddy!
I’m certainly on board for Laimbeer (who, incidently, resigned from the Detroit Shock today. Wonder who’s looking at him?). He has 3 titles in the WNBA and kingsxman stated, if you can coach, you can coach – the league shouldn’t matter.
On that note, I’m still waging my campaign to get Dave Joerger an NBA HC post. This guy has five minor league championships (including the 2007 D-League title) and had a career record of 232-117, a .665 winning %. That’s quite a feat in a tough gig, fellow posters – constantly adjusting to roster changes, mind-numbing travel, and having to deal with the full spectrum of players and their egos (especially those whose only goal is to pump up their own stats to the detrement of the team). Hey, It was a good enough learning experience for Phil Jackson, George Karl and Flip Saunders! (And, since he’s a graduate of Moorhead State, he qualifies as a “homer” – everybody’s happy!)
by SoDakHmr on Jun 15, 2009 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks...
…I’m destined for another girl. When my wife was expecting our first child, I bragged that “I don’t make girls” to all of my friends. She found out what the sex of the baby was and told all of said friends who proceeded to set me up with one of the greatest practical jokes in modern human history (worth a post by itself someday). I have since had another girl and I fully expect this one to be a lady as well. Hopefully, Mankato West girl’s basketball will have a point guard, a small forward, and a center in a few year’s time. Although, daughter #1 has really, really, really taken to swimming and we may have lost our center…which is too bad because there are big girl genes in the pool and her cousins both played women’s college ball as 6-4 centers.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
GRATZ! to SnP!
Enjoy it man!
Beater of the early Thabeet drum ... but not so much of the late one
by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 15, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laimbeer Rumors
Good write up SnP.
There has been some buzz on Laimbeer dropping his WNBA position todday to pursue an NBA opportunity. I have a tough time believing he would fill our head coaching position, but maybe he will be a lead assitant for us? That may not be such a bad idea.
by WallyW0rld on Jun 15, 2009 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding?
McHale and a former Piston Bad Boy teaming up together!? NEVER! Although McHale never came to blows with Laimbeer, both Robert “the Chief” Parish and Larry Bird decked him after getting fed up with his antics. Instead of a suspension being handed down, they got congratulatory notes from the Commissioner’s office…..
by Rascal Flatts on Jun 15, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya know…I honestly didnt even think about the McHale/Laimbeer rivalry!! That would be pretty entertaining.
Coaching wise though, as an assistant its hard to argue his candidacy other than the player rivalry. I wonder if they have made amends.
by WallyW0rld on Jun 15, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Congratulations, man
and pass the Mazel Tov along to your wife, as well.
Uhh, she is the mother, right?
by PoorDick on Jun 15, 2009 5:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Danke
And yes, she is the baby mama.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 15, 2009 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if we trade love i'm done
officially mayn. i couldnt forgive somethin like that. i thin he has potential ta be a pau gasol type player. DO NOT FUCKING TRAD HIM KHAN OR IS PLEX AN U ALREDDDY KNO I DONE ALREDDY PUT DE CLIP IN MAYN
MAYN HOL UP!
by MAYNHOLUP on Jun 16, 2009 12:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with MAYNHOLUP on this...
…not that my opinion means anything, but trading Love is the kind of move that could push me to following the Warriors. OK, maybe not. Instead, I’ll follow the Blazers, now there is management we can respect.
by timmuggs on Jun 16, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
congrats SnP too mayn
we lead different lifestyles playa but mayn iss all about de Wolves so iss nuttin but respect mayn, congratulations trilla
MAYN HOL UP!
by MAYNHOLUP on Jun 16, 2009 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thank you
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 16, 2009 6:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And congrats to Stop-n-pop...
Way to go on the family side, and the blog is terrific, it has become a habit for me.
by timmuggs on Jun 16, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks...
…for both comments.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 17, 2009 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mitchell, McHale, Laimbeer...meh.
Lots of names being batted about here. I was initially all for Sam Mitchell as head coach, but I have since cooled on him a little. It’s tough, however, to know who to turn to instead. While McHale might be a good ego manager, is that enough to win in this league? Might there be others out there who deserve the chance to coach in this league who would be committed to player development and a style that might fit this team.
Is McHale the kind of basketball mind that can put together an up-tempo offensive system (as it seems to be the concensus that a faster pace fits this team the best)? Would bringing Laimbeer in as a top assistant be a good move in that direction?
Mitchell is the biggest name being bandied about because he’s a former T-Wolf and has experience as a coach and in that time as a coach he didn’t fall flat on his face, at the very least. While that might not be the best resume for a coach in this league, I’d have to wonder if McHale’s resume is that much better.
I’d prefer an experienced assistant from a playoff team to either McHale or Mitchell. What about Lakers assistants like Kurt Rambis or Brian Shaw? Or perhaps an assistant from the Magic, since that’s the team everyone seems to feel this team might one day develop into?
It’s nice that the current players on this roster like McHale. They should – he’s the one who gave them their jobs. But, David Kahn can’t worry too much about that. Depending on the moves he’s planning, a lot of those guys that love McHale might not be wearing Wolves unis in the near future anyway.
Oh, and I am new here, but congrats S-n-P.
by BLayne23 on Jun 16, 2009 11:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks...
…and thanks for reading/contributing.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 16, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












