Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Chauncey Billups Injures Achilles Tendon

The Washington Wizards have acquired Minnesota Timberwolves guards Randy Foye(notes) and Mike Miller(notes) for Etan Thomas(notes), Oleksiy Pecherov(notes) and Darius Songaila and the fifth pick in Thursday’s NBA draft, a league executive with knowledge of the deal told Yahoo! Sports.

over 2 years ago Dr wyn 266 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Wow!

That’s a lot to give up for the 5th pick in this draft, but I think I like it.

Now, do we sit tight, and draft a Curry-Harden backcourt, or make another move, perhaps #5 and #18 for #2, and try to get Rubio or Thabeet?

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 6:33 PM CDT reply actions  

hmmm

If this is true, Minnesota controls the 2009 draft…

by DR_JPK on Jun 23, 2009 6:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Wholy shit...

This mean…that We will take #6 and #18 for #2 to get Rubio, and then take thabeet @ #5…..GOD I Love this deal!

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 6:34 PM CDT reply actions  

I hope you're right

Because those two chumps coming over with Songalia sure don’t look like much help.

by TMiss on Jun 23, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

David Kahn

Early candidate for NBA Executive of the Year.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 6:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Holy crap.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Jun 23, 2009 6:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Possible New Lineup with this trade..and with what I think how the draft will go...

PG Rubio-Telfair
SG – Carney..2nd round pick or Lesser known Free agent.
SF- Gomes- Brewer
PF- Jefferson- Love
C- Thabeet – Songaila- Pecherov.

I’m thinking Etan Thomas will be Bought out… but my god i love this deal!

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 6:44 PM CDT reply actions  

yup. Probably comparable to Hansbrough in style.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Jun 23, 2009 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just curious

if you take Rubio #2, Thabeet goes #3 to OKC, no? So how do you land him at #5?

True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Jun 23, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised if they kept Thomas...

He’s a backup C and supposedly a good defender. Plus, his expiring can be flipped in another deal if necessary.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

One potential fly in the ointment

All those big men in return may not be just cap filler—they could be replacements if Love gets moved.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 6:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Concering Thabeet and heres how i think it will go..

Minnesota Will package #6 and # 18 and a player..maybe Cardinal..to OKC for #3…just maybe..

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 6:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Cool . . .

Column A
Thabeet
Harden
Evans
DeRozan

Column B
Curry
Flynn
Lawson
Holiday

One from Column A, one from Column B, please. Oh, can you sprinkle in some Austin Daye, as well, and heck, toss on Nick Calathes while you’re at it.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

God, I'd love it

but this trade is satisfying enough, and I’m not ready to reach for Rubio plus one.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

This trade..

is not making me any less optimistic about Kahny Boy.

I’m still feeling good about the draft, but he still has a long way to go.

Passing grade from me on the first personnel move though.

by mnjayhawk on Jun 24, 2009 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

They're reading the Wolves' collective mind, are they?

I’m pretty sure if you were wanting to move up, you would say exactly the opposite so as not to compromise your bargaining position.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Draft haiku

Kerplunk, the sound of Kahn making a splash.

Two picks in the top 6! Thursday will be interesting. Can’t wait.

by uncle rico on Jun 23, 2009 6:49 PM CDT reply actions  

This just made the NW division a little more interesting...

If Kahn doesn’t screw this up and if he lands a couple of good players, the Wolves could actually become a pretty good team in a few years.

by lrh86 on Jun 23, 2009 6:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Please

don’t speak for me.

June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."

by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jun 23, 2009 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd say that

Kahn just lived up to that promis :)

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Jun 23, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Keep the 5 & 6

Let’s rebuild that back-court right here right now. Harden, Evans, Curry, Jennings I don’t really care which two you get but get two of these guys and let’s play.

Now we’ve got close to a million 6-9/10 guys to throw down at the block and we can just play up-tempo all season long.

by Drakesax on Jun 23, 2009 6:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Hmm..If the Wolves intend to keep Both Picks hmm

well okay if they keep the 2 picks heres how the lineup could shake out in my hopes with Thabeet and Rubio going before #5

PG Stephen Curry- Bassy
SG Tyreke Evans- Rodney Carney
SF Ryan Gomes – Corey Brewer
PF Kevin Love- Darius Songaila
C- Al Jefferson- Pecherov…

What do you all think of this line up?

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 6:55 PM CDT reply actions  

I wouldn't say

all the moves are made yet . . .

June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."

by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jun 23, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

It says "Definitely Not David Kahn"

but if I WERE him, I would remember you when I decide who stays, and who . . . goes.

June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."

by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jun 23, 2009 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL haha..didn't catch that!

But he could not be done…But if the reports are true that would still be a hell of a lineup

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

#5 & #6 are too much for #2

especially with rumors that Rubio may fall. #5 or #6 plus #18 for #2 is fine.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 7:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Hmmm . . .

It depends on how far Rubio falls, and who else jumps up over 5/6 (Hill, Holiday, Evans, etc.), but I think they will come out of this with one of Rubio Thabeet Harden, and another of Evans Curry Jennings. I’m excited as hell about getting Rubio even if it means the 5th and the 6th for him. But I’d be hard-pressed to argue for Rubio alone, versus 2 of the 5 of Thabeet Harden Evans Curry Jennings

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

let me be the first to congratulate you guys on either the stephen curry or the ricky rubio era. and maybe both?

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 23, 2009 7:12 PM CDT reply actions  

if nothing else

Well, if nothing else, this will squash that vapid national speculation that he Wolves were looking to draft someone “to play off Foye.”

I love this, but I hope Kahn doesn’t try to get too clever for his own good.

by Rasho Revolution on Jun 23, 2009 7:13 PM CDT reply actions  

With you on both counts

The number of mock drafts that described the Wolves passing on all those points because they had some faith in Foye was ridiculous. Certainly made me doubt all mock drafts everywhere, anyway.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those people forgot

that McHale is not the GM any more. I think he is the only one in Minn who thought Foye was a PG.

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Jun 23, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

agreed...

….did they not see the massive pg workout that just took place here?

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brilliant

Absolutely brilliant. I’ve already forgotten who our old GM was. What was his name again? This puts the Wolves and Mr Kahn in the drivers seat come thursday. 5,6 and 18. We could either stay put and rebuild the back court a la Harden/Curry, or move up for Rubio and keep one of 5/6 and take either Curry or Harden, whoever’s left. I have an official mancrush on David Kahn.

by erikanthony on Jun 23, 2009 7:14 PM CDT reply actions  

"Mr. Kahn"

Yes, until he takes a step backward, I think he should be referred to as “Mr. Kahn.” A title of respect, if you will.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

As they should

it’s not really a good pick for them.

No offense to Foye (& Miller), but they’re not worth the #5 pick. Even in this draft.

True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Jun 23, 2009 7:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right?

I hope they do well for the Wiz, especially Foye. Playing next to Agent Zero or whatever he’s calling himself now should free up some space for Foye.

As for Miller, this passage from Chad Ford’s story will get a chuckle from Wolves’ fans:

The Wizards look at Miller as filling a 3-point shooting void

Uh, yeah, that’s what we were looking for, too.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is funny

But let’s face it, Washington may be more accepting of Millers self-imposed “unselfish” play since he’ll be playing with far superior offensive talent than what we had.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can live with his kamikaze drive/kickouts to the PG when it’s Arenas spotting up in the corner instead of Bassy..

by Xand1 on Jun 23, 2009 7:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great trade...

…to move to #5 without giving up anyone who factored into our long term plans. That’s two deals today that had everything to do with money. Essentially, we take on the money of Songalia for an extra year to pick number five on Thursday. Great use of our cap space because it’s a real effective way for us to get good players. Love it, now let’s make the right picks at 5 and 6.

by twolvesgm on Jun 23, 2009 7:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Jerry Zgoda...

…is saying he believes Kahn wants to trade 5 and 6 to Memphis for 2 to draft either Rubio or Thabeet. I don’t know if I’m interested in doing that, I’d rather draft Harden and Curry and roll with that backcourt for the next number of years.

http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/wolves/?elr=KArksi8cyaiUo8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr

by twolvesgm on Jun 23, 2009 7:23 PM CDT reply actions  

oh god no Kahn

That would be very McHale esque..i think #6 and #18 gets it done

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Moving those two picks for Thabeet would be impossible

unless he ALSO has eyes on another starting perimeter player from another team.

Thabeet/AlJeff/Thomas
Love/Pech/Smith/Cardinal/MadDog/Shelden Williams?
Gomes/Brewer/Song/
28th pick?
Bassy/18th pick?

That’s a lot of lumber in the 4-5, and not a whole lot of depth at the guard position.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

For whatever reason Zgoda’s been fixated on Thabeet against all odds.

In a draft full of guards, with a backcourt that’s now down to Sebastian Telfair and Bobby Brown, he’s got us cashing in our chips on the upside-risk center. Seems to lack perspective.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can't

they’re so short on Wings right now. Seriously your returning wing is Corey Brewer. Carney’s a FA, and Gomes is better as a 4.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

So what is next?

First, I am hoping for Rubio. Big time. Other than that, a good initial rebuilding move.

However, our 4-5 group is now Al, Love, Pechorov, Songalia, Thomas, Maddog, Smith, Cardinal. Eight guys, 96 minutes. I don’t know anything about Pech, but we are sitting on 4 guys who will never see the court (and our Euor Pec). And our 1-3 is 5 guys for can’t get anywhere near 144 minutes on a decent team. Something else is coming, we can’t depend on 2 rookie guards right away.

Who else is on the way out? What scares me is it might be Love. On the other hand, we aren’t drafting Thabeet (thankfully) even if we do draft up (and if we do it better not be 5 and 6).

by CaliWolf on Jun 23, 2009 7:25 PM CDT reply actions  

My hope is...That we take the #6 and Craig Smith trade to OKC for #3...

and then we take #5, #18 and probably Mad Dog to memphis for #2,, and then Thomas gets bought out…Cardinal gets bought out as well..although his contract is ridiculous..

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let's just get nuts here for a minute

Love, 5, and 6 for Blake Griffin?

Today’s news has opened my eyes to all sorts of possibilities.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 7:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Just can not see that happening unless McHAle comes back, and then he probably takes Thabeet instead. . .

Sometimes the obvious is hidden.

by frankenhoops on Jun 24, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pechorov projects as Madsen's replacement as a Victory Cigar.

If we trade Love for Thabeet- all positive vibes for Kahn are gone.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

That popping noise

was me uncorking a bottle of champagne.

Love, Jefferson, #5, #6, #18, #28, Pekovic. My god that is a stable of nice assets that can be leveraged or just kept in tact.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 7:26 PM CDT reply actions  

What he said

So far we know he’s willing to make decisions about the value of current assets. That’s not the same set of abilities involved in projecting someone like Tyreke Evans out two or three years.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

The difference in salary between the #5 and #6 over 4 yrs is almost $2M.

My condolences to the #6 pick.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Jun 23, 2009 7:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Good news so far...

But I’m worried that they’ll do 5 and 6 for 2, which isn’t fair value no matter who’s there at 5 and 6. They might hold onto both until they see who slips and then look to make a move.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 7:33 PM CDT reply actions  

I’m hearing lots about how we’re not done. One source says that we’re working for the #2, but that if we don’t get it we’re looking at Evans/Flynn at #5/#6. Take it for what it’s worth.

What I’d like to see them do is try to move the 5 or 6 plus the #18 and Cardinal to Memphis for the #2 and Marko. Then we can take Rubio and get a complementary player at 5/6 – say a finisher like Earl Clark or DeRozan. Not a fan of the idea of moving both the 5 and 6 for the #2, though. I’d rather just keep them both.

by Xand1 on Jun 23, 2009 7:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Don't like Evans/Flynn combo

We need a floor spacer now more than ever with both Miller and Foye gone. That means Stephen Curry and/or James Harden is a must have…..

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Curry/Evans is my favorite, unless Harden falls in which case I love Curry/Harden. Not a big fan of that one, but maybe it’s just pressure like Django says. I think there’s a very high chance we walk with with the #2, which hopefully becomes Rubio.

by Xand1 on Jun 23, 2009 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Curry/Evans please...

…although, if they can package something like 6, 18, and Pekovic for 2, they can draft Rubio (if they think that highly of him) and then take Evans or Harden or Thabeet at 5.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm giddy enough

that I think they can cough up 5 and 6 for Rubio, and use your packages to get back into the late lottery to get an SG like DeRozan.

If they use 5 and 6 to get Rubio, they’ll have two PGs and only Brewer at the SG. So they’ll have to get somebody else to start, anyway. It might as well be Rubio and somebody else, rather than Curry/DeRozan.

June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."

by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jun 23, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Something like this would be awesome.

We obviously don’t want to hang on to all of our picks. We have FOUR first rounders now, right?Plus two second rounders. You can’t seriously field a team with six rookies. Right? If we can leverage some of those additional picks to grab Rubio and still keep another top 6 pick, I’m down.

by princelyfrank on Jun 23, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wait till after the draft

I bet this comes down to draft night. Memphis takes Rubio at #2 (he needs to go that high for his buyout) and then if the right player falls to #5 we trade #5 and #18 to Memphis for Rubio.

And Kahn, not so stupid, is playing it all “yeah, we’re keeping #5 and #6” to put the pressure on Memphis – because we won’t give up both for #2 and because #5 and #6 will be good players so it’s fine to stick with ’em.

It ain’t a bluff.

by Django Z on Jun 23, 2009 7:40 PM CDT reply actions  

If I was Kahn

Send Love to Memphis for #2 and draft Rubio.
Send #6 &#18 to OKC for #3 drfaft Thabeet
We take Harden at #5 (Sac won’t take Harden at #4 b/c they have Kevin Martin)
Throw in #28, if necessary, for one of the above or draft a EuroStash.

So we’re sitting at:

PG: Rubio/Bassy
SG: Harden/Brewer
SF: Gomes/Brewer
PF: Big Al/Rhino
C: Thabeet/Etan Thomas

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 7:43 PM CDT reply actions  

I think OKC

drafts Thabeet and sticks with him if he’s available at #3.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

They were ready to Pay chandler $10+ million for multiple years to do essentially the same thing that Thabeet’s skill set is.

by Ebomb on Jun 23, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

chandler is a decent offensive player. that is not in thabeet’s skill set at all.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 23, 2009 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

What? Thabeet can’t dunk? j/k.

by homer simpson on Jun 23, 2009 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really dislike Al and Thabeet as a fit

1. Thabeet has no game away from the basket (Not that’s he got much of an offensive game near the basket)

2. Both are poor passers.

3. This is not going to get Al good looks since the blocks are going to be clogged up.

4. Any value you might get with blocks on defense is mostly off-set by trading away an elite rebounder in Love and his contributions to the Wolves being 5th in DRR.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

This draft just got so much more exciting...

What happens to 18 and 28? We need to add multiple guards, but we also have about 13 too many power forwards. We’re nowhere near done dealing.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 7:52 PM CDT reply actions  

staying at 5&6

The only thing that worries me about staying at #5-6 is if:

Clippers take Griffin
Grizzlies take Thabeet
OKC takes Harden
Sac takes Rubio

What do we do now? Evans and Curry? While Curry can shoot lights out, I worry a bit about Evans ability to play SG (assuming Curry is the PG).

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 7:54 PM CDT reply actions  

i know...

but not sure he’s an NBA caliber shooter for a SG.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely Not

He’s a very poor shooter.

Curry and Evans is an odd/intriguing/scary backcourt.

A physical 2 who can’t shoot, but drives and finishes as good as anyone in the draft and is a decent passer, but no PG.

A PG who shoots extremely well and distributes okay, but is small framed.

I like Curry as one of the selections but I’m starting to grow wary of Evans. He could be a huge star or never develop a good enough shot and be a semi-bust. I can’t tell with him.

Count me among those who hope someone falls to us.

Rubio/Evans is fine. Curry/Harden would be fantastic. Thabeet/Curry. All good, but Evans/Curry is the one pairing I can’t see working out. Still, how great to have these problems. :)

by Django Z on Jun 23, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess...

my point is that if we stay at #5 and #6, I’m hoping Rubio, Thabeet or Harden slipped to us at #5.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Still, that's two really young dudes for your starting backcourt

Telfair is still going to get significant burn and may even hang on as our starting PG to begin the season, no matter who it is we end up with as a PG prospect (Rubio, Tyreke, Curry, etc.).

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kahn you do it again

The pre-draft talk was that Wolves would not keep their 3 picks. Now they have 4 first rounders. To trade Love and a pick like 5 or 6 for the 2nd pick still leaves three picks. Thus, back to where they started. This definitely has to be a stay tuned.

by Elastico on Jun 23, 2009 7:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Sam Amick of the Sacramento Bee just Twittered that

“we shouldn’t be shocked if #5 and #6 are traded for Rubio”

Kahn should have enough Brain Cells in his head to realize that The #5 and #6 is too Much and that #6 and #18 is Plenty Enough.

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 7:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Sacramento still in control for #2

They take Harden at #4, who is a great fit with Memphis, and then trade him and Thompson up to the Wiz for Rubio….Are we willing to top that deal?

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Then you take...

…the leftovers: Curry and Evans. The Wolves just defused about every big leverage item Sacramento and Memphis had going for them. At the very worst, the Wolves keep 5 and 6 and draft their back court of the future.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Let’s not get overzealous here. We just landed the friggin’ 5th and 6th pick while not touching our two best players in Love and Jefferson. It’s perfectly OK to stand pat. I’m just saying that Sacto can put together a package that would force us to do something potentially stupid to get Rubio.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Memphis needs a PF (Hill)...

not another SG…they already have Conley and Mayo. Harden is not a great fit unless he’s a sixth man or Mayo take over PG duties.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's where Jason Thompson comes in

They get Thompson + Harden, thus allowing Mayo to play on the ball along with Conley and Harden is the full-time 2. That’s a solid 3-guard rotation.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have to think that Mayo won't be Memphis' pg...

… he really struggled last year when he was on the ball. I love Mayo and am in the minority here who still wishes we would’ve kept him, but his handle is not quite as good as was advertised before the draft last year, and I think he’d be even worse as a point guard for them than Foye was for us. It looks to me like they’ll go with Conley, Mayo, and Gay unless they would do something like trade Conley to Portland and then select Rubio (which may be impossible because of Memphis’ poor history with Spanish players). So I don’t think Harden is a good fit in Memphis. I’ve been a Harden fan all along and I really hope he falls to us at number five.

by Shogun on Jun 23, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly -- Mayo is the SG in Memphis

They seriously did not seem to be headed toward Mayo’s transition to point under Hollins late last year. If anything, the Grizzlies were giving Conley lots more burn. Their conspicuous position of need would be PF.

If we should see the #2 as Rubio, and then Hill with five or six, we know where things are going. Might not get announced until the #18 pick’s made, however.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Some of those Wiz will have to go

Nobody is asking (yet) but unless traded as individuals (maybe draft choices can be packaged?) the Wolves must wait two months before packaging any of the incoming Wizard players in another trade.

by levi_mn on Jun 23, 2009 8:00 PM CDT reply actions  

No thanks . . .

I just took one.

TO THE CLEANERS, THAT IS!

June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."

by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jun 23, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh God..here's the Line of the Night

Somebody at the Startribune blog just asked if we draft Rubio and Thabeet..with Al, Love, Rubio and Thabeet…would that be enough to Entice Lebron in 2010! BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAH

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 8:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Oh Snaps...Rubio might not go to OKC @ 3...

Apparently Russell Westbrook told Management in OKC that he wan’t out if they draft Rubio…which would be pointless with Westbrook having a hell of a rookie season.

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 8:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Memphis takes Rubio and awaits the highest bidder

OKC takes Thabeet and stays pat
Sacto takes Harden and tries to move up for Rubio
David Kahn, you’re on the clock…….

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's no way Sam Presti gets held hostage by Westbrook

He’s the smartest guy in the league. He knows what he’s doing.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Perhaps

OKC can point out to Westbrook who does the drafting and who does the playing.

Seriously.

by Auswolf on Jun 23, 2009 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

no kidding

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

On the deal itself

That’s a good job by Kahn. Trading inessential pieces for a chance at an essential piece is well done.

I don’t think I’d do 5 and 6 for Rubio, but I might. He has a chance to be a special player. I don’t think 5+18 gets it done, though.

They might be setting up a Love or Jefferson for 2, since they got a glut of frontcourt guys from the Wiz, but they can’t possibly keep all those picks, can they?

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:13 PM CDT reply actions  

My problem with trading both picks for Rubio

is you need Wings!!!! Wings!!! Wings!!! Corey Brewer can not be your only true wing going forward.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, you are right

they need wings.

But what they really need is greatness. Rubio could be great.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why is everyone so happy?

The wolves now have multiple picks in one of the worst drafts in several years. Even the salaries don’t help. Foye and Miller are roughly 12 million per year for two more years. The package the Wizards sent are roughly 12 million per year for two more years with one more additional year of Songolia for a little over 4 million. The wizards unloaded three unwanted contracts and got two useful players for the measly price of the fifth pick in a poor draft. They might still be laughing.

by jstamp26 on Jun 23, 2009 8:14 PM CDT reply actions  

Excellent perspective...

I like this for the Wolves, I’m glad Kahn dared to do something like this. But the Wiz did just fine too, in fact it is a great move for them. Miller and Foye will do well there.

by timmuggs on Jun 23, 2009 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

A few things

1- The draft doesn’t have huge top end talent but it is relatively deep in point guards as well as having what some people believe to be a legit shot-blocking center…which are, by many accounts, two of the team’s biggest needs. I’m not so sure there are too many drafts where guys like Griffin, Rubio, Thabeet, Evans, Harden or Curry fall out of the top 10 or 15 picks. There is, admittedly, no Derrick Rose or Kevin Durants, but there are a lot of solid players to be had and the Wolves need upgrading across the board…even in the areas where Foye and Miller played. That point can’t be repeated enough: the Wolves were not all that functional at the 1, 2, or 3 last year and that was with Miller and Foye.

2- The Wolves gave away 2 players that were in all likelihood not going to be with the team in 2010 for a top 5 pick. They maintained Love and Jefferson as well as 18, 28 and Pekovic. There is probably some more moving to be done.

3- I think this deal works out well for both teams. The Wiz get to save about 7 mil this season while getting two guys that can help them immediately and the Wolves get to fill two big needs near the top of a draft. It’s not lopsided but everyone gets what they need. The Wolves will take a bit of a hit with the salary bit but they weren’t going to seriously compete for 2 years anyway by the way Kahn has made it sound. This way, they can sit still and draft their back court of the future or get a bit aggressive and go for the Rubio/Thabeet boom/bust home run cut.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Absolutely -- what I meant to say... and it works for the Wiz with Flip as coach

A really good deal is onw where both sides get to say — hey, good deal.

If the Wiz fans don’t like it, they are even dumber than me.

by timmuggs on Jun 23, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Worst draft in several years?

This gets said every draft for the past 10 years. Sometimes it has been “after Lebron” or “after Oden and Durant” this is the worst draft – but every year is supposed to be terrible. I don’t buy it.

Almost every draft has had a top stud or two and then a range of possible players after that who may or may not be stars. We never really know until 5 years later.

In this draft it seems like there are 6 possibly special players: Harden, Griffin, Rubio, Thabeet, Curry and Evans. And now we get 2 of them. I think that’s pretty sweet.

And Foye and Miller? They’ll help the Wiz, but hardly key building blocks for a 24 win team.

Go Khan!

by Django Z on Jun 23, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I completely agree...

with your assessment of the top six players in this draft being pretty good. The fact that we should get two of them should be exciting for everyone on this board. Every year they say it’s a weak draft, but that’s always just GMs trying to trade up to get the guy they want.

by twolvesgm on Jun 23, 2009 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Random thought:

Any chance the Wolves package a pick and stuff for Rajon Rondo?

by McCleak on Jun 23, 2009 8:15 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

If they keep the picks

It seems like the correct play is Curry and whoever is still there between Harden and Evans.

I will say, though, that if they do that, next year is going to be pretty ugly. 2 rookies in the backcourt is going to be tough. And not only next year—developing 2 guys like that isn’t going to be easy.

I like the deal, but it isn’t without pitfalls.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, it could be bad

they could only win, like, 24 games or something.

Wait a minute.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, I'm not complaining

They need to take risks to get better, and I approve of this trade. But you could be looking at 14 wins if they commit to playing an all rookie backcourt.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seeing as the record for losses in a season is 9,

And they won 24 last year with very few games of Love and AlJeff starting together, I’m willing to bet the team improves on 24 wins with the current line-up, plus random rookies at the guard positions.

Buy me a beer and a brat on the Terrace if I’m right.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

You got a deal

I hope you’re right.

,,,but I think you meant that the record for WINS is 9…

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Say the Wolves don't move up and get Rubio or Thabeet...

and we take Evans and Curry…do we make a Deal concerning the #18 and #28 to move up and take BJ Mullens..or would you think we are Set after getting 6’9 Songaila, 7’0 Pecherov and 6’10 Thomas?…

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 8:22 PM CDT reply actions  

One nice thing

is that we now don’t need to B.J. “Bust” Mullens. Let’s go get Daye!

by McCleak on Jun 23, 2009 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

On Thabeet

I really don’t think he’s on the radar. I’m convinced Kahn is not really high on him. After kicking Foye and Miller to the curb, I’d expect a guard heavy look in the next few days. We have Bassy, who Kahn clearly thinks is a very good backup PG, but after that our guard situation is now retroactively in shambles. I believe it’s a very strong possibility Mr Kahn is trying to rebuild the PG/SG situation. I’m crossing my fingers for Harden/Curry at 5 and 6. Just thinking about it gives me butterflies. Seriously, can we go into next season with Kevin Ollie as the starting PG and a bag-o-doughnuts at the 2? Here’s what I envision:
1. Curry
2. Harden
3. Gomes/trade
4. Love
5. Jeff

The bench would be some combination of Bassy, Brewer, Carney, Songaila and a draft pick. I haven’t been this interested in the franchise in years.

by erikanthony on Jun 23, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

This deal shores up all the 4/5 rotation questions, and leaves us with a need for guards. In a HUGELY Guard-heavy draft, this is an extremely smart move by Kahn.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 23, 2009 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

well put...

….they need to walk away with a starting back court. whether that is rubio/evans, rubio/holiday, curry/harden, or curry/evans, they can put a back court duo in place to grow alongside big al and love.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would you try and move up to take Mullens?

If we really wanted him (which I don’t think we do… I know I personally don’t), he’ll likely be available around 18. We’d probably take someone more for the backcourt at 18, if we keep it.

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 23, 2009 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lots of bigs...

I think somebody above mentioned it, but the Wolves’ frontcourt, upon completion of this trade now includes Jeff, Love Cardinal, Madsen, Smith, Songaila, Thomas, Pecherov and maybe Williams. That’s a lot of loot tied up in what could be useless contracts. Cardinal, Madsen and Smith are expirings. Don’t be suprised if one or a few of them are moved in another trade with a team looking to cut salary.

by erikanthony on Jun 23, 2009 8:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Thomas and Pecherov are also expiring so to be honest I wouldn’t be surprised if 3 of these guys get moved again by Thursday night. The only question is does Kahn use them in a Richard Jefferson-esque trade and accelerate the 17-month plan? They certainly have the pieces now with 6 draft picks. I want to keep all the pieces we have without picking up any more salary for 2010.

by jballer_13 on Jun 23, 2009 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tempered enthusiasm

Sorry if I am not as enthusiastic.

Thomas had heart valve surgery missing all of 2007-08 and played in only 29 games last year with very limited production. We will be paying him ~$14M (~7M/per) for 2 years of what is likely to be little play. Pecherov will challenge Madsen for the team lead in DNP-CD’s next year (but at least he is cheap). Songaila has a $4.5M contract with a very likely player exercised $5M contract for 2010-11. He is almost the exact same size as Love – better perimeter shooter maybe but not a rebounder. Not a defensive player either. Possibly a #8/9 player off the bench but certainly not the interior defender most everyone agrees we need.

So, at least on paper, we did not receive much in the form of NBA players. We got the #5 player in what is universally described as a “1 and done” draft for sure fire NBA stars. It is very unlikely that #2, 5, 6 or combination there of will be that #1 guy that Kahn says we lack.

We gave up Miller which I don’t see as much of an issue – except that his expiring contract just might have been more valuable at the trade deadline than it is right now. But who knows – OK with that.

So, it comes down to Foye vs the plethora of guards being projected in the 2-8. (I know there is some slight chance we get Thabeet). I am not as down on Foye as the rest of you guys. He certainly has ability and has proven he can play in the NBA. Not sure if he is a starter or reserve on a championship caliber team.

My guess is that Foye’s career will be at least as good as several of these guards and probably not quite as good as a few other. Anyone know which ones it will be? Me neither.

I said it when McHale was turned down as coach – it signaled that Kahn has chosen to take the higher risk – higher reward path. Here is the 1st move. Keep your fingers crossed.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 8:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Good points

as usual. But Miller wasn’t part of this team’s long-term plans anyway. And we know what Foye is—a decent, undersized two guard. He and we need him to get a fresh start somewhere else. You’re right—he’ll probably have a better NBA career than half of the guards picked in the lottery this year, and we don’t know which ones those will be.

But a 24 win team with only two NBA starters can’t afford the “safe” route. By the time we find out if that was the way to go, the team will be playing in Kansas City.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think at least one thing above is wrong

Thomas is owed 7 million for next season, then his contract expires.

The only money they are obligated for 2010-11 is Songalia’s 5 million player option.

I agree that Foye will be better than some players picked in the top 10, but to me, that isn’t really the issue. It was clear that Foye was not going to be a central part of a winning team here. The Wolves are bad. They need to take risks to get star level players. It may not work out, but giving yourself a roll of the dice at the expense of Foye seems like a good gamble for a team in the Wolves situation.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

You are correct

I missed read the column. Thomas is only owed $7M this year. Thanks for the correction.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

The sure mediocre player or the possibility of a star?

I don’t see how this is a hard choice for a 24 win team. Roll the dice on the possible star.

I like Foye too, but we know what he is and what he will never be. Plus the GM has to have some faith in his scouts – they get paid to make these picks and for it to be more than a roll of the dice. If they’ve done their homework then I think the #5 pick will be better than Foye.

by Django Z on Jun 23, 2009 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not so great

Below-average shooter, above-average passer, below-average defender. 1 for 3. Though one could argue his catch-and-shoot skills will improve going away from Minnesota, where he was the only guard capable of creating his own shot.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

You’ve got it mixed up a bit: Foye is a below average passer, probably a slightly below average defender and an above-average shooter. Telfair was also more than capable of creating shots for himself, he just couldn’t knock them down. Foye’s problem was that he really wasn’t shooting 3’s as much as he should be for a guy who A) is a pretty good shooter from distance and B) isn’t great at finishing in the lane or getting to the line. Hopefully he’ll improve on that area on the Wiz with Flip coaching.

by Xand1 on Jun 23, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd actually agree with Mike

Foye’s a more than capable passer. He’s just not very good at running an offense. I would say he’s a streaky but medicore shooter. His Defense was the most disappointing aspect of his game with the T-Wolves.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Consider me confused, I guess. Are you judging his ability to throw passes or his ability to actually make those passes meaningfull? I mean… he can do all the basics: wrist pass, chest pass, bounce pass, he just doesn’t do much with them due to lack of bball IQ. He’s not bad by any means; I would say he’s an average playmaker by the standards of NBA two-guards, but anything more than that is just overrating his abilities. I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree, but to me his shooting from deep is what will ultimately make him a useful player.

by Xand1 on Jun 23, 2009 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Foye's weakness

I think we’re talking about slightly different things.

1. I agree with you Foye’s decision-making isn’t the best to be a NBA 1. It seems to stem for overdribbling or indecisiveness more than anything. My main point is that he’s not a selfish player or incapable of dishing off to a given player. So my issue lies more in Basketball IQ than general passing capability. You’re right I probably overstated his passing ability in my previous post. I’m just pointing out his failure as a PG had nothing to do with his passing skills rather his decision-making.

2. As far as value from shooting- He shot 36% from deep for the year (This is a very average PCT) Although his 41% shooting last year (is above average). Going off just shooting metrics from this year- he was average from deep. Although if you include last year’s numbers and take away his awful- NOV/DEC you’re statement’s probably accurate.

I think our debate has to do with semantics. I respect your takes- so I don’t we’re that far off in agreement.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 24, 2009 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm talking purely numerically

Foye’s assist percentage was way above the average for shooting guards last year and his eFG% on jumpers was pretty decently below the average. I’m realizing more and more that context matters greatly here, though.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 24, 2009 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sure, I thought you were talking about as a PG next to Gil. I guess it’s an interchangeable role, though. He’s an OK passer for sure, but he had the ball in his hands A LOT, so that might skew those assist #’s up because he did play plenty of PG.

You’ll like him, though. I think he’s got room for improvement despite his age. He’s definitely still finding his niche in the NBA, and he seems to improve on something every year. If he learns to shoot more 3’s, stop shooting bad layups in the lane and commit himself to D he’d be a very nice player. Even if he doesn’t do those things he’s still a solid scorer with a knack for some really clutch plays.

by Xand1 on Jun 25, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about that?!

;)

He will be a solid fit in Flip’s system. You guys got 2 players who will log big time minutes and do well with Flip. Miller will surprise you if you can get past the fact that he wants to be Magic Johnson at times and will go down with a faux soccer injury about 2 times per game. Sometimes, it looks as if though he has been shot by a sniper when he gets a boo-boo. Watching him milk minor dings and bruises was one of the highlights of the year for a bad squad.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm confident Foye is better than he showed in Minnesota

My problem is trying to figure out how he’ll get minutes. Unless GIl is hurt, of course.

I’ve always liked Miller as a fit next to Gil on offense. He passes well and, assuming he gets over his Magic Johnson thing, shoots well too. There aren’t too many guards with average-to-low usage rates that can do that in this league.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Foye is a fine offensive two guard...

his biggest issues are on defense, where he often struggled to stay in front of anybody. Problem is, Miller has the same problem.

But Arenas-Foye is a really bigtime backcourt for perimeter shooting. If Jamison and Butler can keep the floor spread, that’s a great offensive team.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

They look nothing alike...

but they share some of the same qualities.

Miller developed some weird, misplaced tendency to penetrate and kick, last year. It never worked, since there was usually a poor shooter like Telfair standing in the corner.

Foye is a streaky offensive player, who REALLY needs confidence to succeed. When he is hot, he gets unbelievably hot. In a mid-season game vs OKC, last year, Foye had over 30 at half and his 3’s weren’t touching the net.

If Foye would’ve played the entire season at 2-guard, his stats would have been better and who knows, maybe we don’t make this trade. I like him more than Miller, and I think Saunders will too.

I like this trade for the Wolves, because the #5/6/18/28 give us flexibility that we didn’t have, before and our team is young enough to feel good about rookies. I actually like it for Washington, too, since they have veteran stars and Foye is going to be better than any rookie guard, next year. We’re still haunted by letting Billups walk, and Foye was a better Wolf than Billups.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed on Foye...

….being a Flip guy. He’s a perfect fit. As is Miller.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, what Andy G said, and S&P

Flip got some guys that can help his game. And dumped some guys on us that we cannot use. But we got what we needed. A good trade for the Wiz, and the Wolves, and the league.

by timmuggs on Jun 23, 2009 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

For comparison's sake

The most accurate way to judge this trade is whether or not we got the most we could for Miller and Foye. Because at the end of the day neither was part of the long term strategy here. Miller’s contract was expiring and I agree with Kahn that it probably would have cost too much to re-sign Foye, who is, at best, a 6th man on a playoff team.

A good comparison: Boston traded #5 pick (Jeff Green) plus Wally and Delonte West for Ray Allen and #35 (great pick by Boston in Big Baby).

Are these trades comparable?

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 8:49 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

excellent point

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow! Apparently today’s the day where the deals start happening!

When it comes to the NBA draft, I’m always, always, always a quality over quantity guy. So that’s to say, if they’ve done their homework on Rubio and they really like him enough and they’ve exhausted all the other avenues, then I’m not flat out opposed to just trading the 5 and 6 to get him. But if the plan B is now 2 of Harden/Curry/Evans…that’s out of sight, too. (Just no Jonny Flynn, please!).

Obviously by including both Foye and Miller, 2-guard is now the bigger need than PG, as Bassy’s still around… Obviously now the best case scenario is they can get to 2 by holding on to one of the 5/6, then take Rubio + Harden/Curry/Evans. But as I said, I just love how at the very least they’re going to likely end up with 2 of the Harden/Curry/Evans group (or at least a shot to do that, provided there’s no Flynning around).

by jianfu on Jun 23, 2009 8:53 PM CDT reply actions  

A steal for the

Pecherov has a nice skillset but was underutilised at the Wizards. His jumpshot is better than Al’s and Kevin’s. If there is ball movement between the frontcourt during doubles (on Al) he could be lethal. The problem is that he is a bad defender and rebounder

by WhaHuh on Jun 23, 2009 9:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Songalia is the interesting piece to me.

He supposedly plays ‘defense’. This concept intrigues me to no end.

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 23, 2009 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Judging by the Wizards fans, you're right

One of the consistent early reactions from them is that Darius S. didn’t fit in, because he played that side of the ball.

by feral on Jun 23, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind keeping these picks...

because I’m sure we can get two players that can really help the team there. If we decide to package the 5 and 6 to Memphis, then we definately should go after Harden. I’m still nervous about Rubio’s youth, injury history and shooting skills – maybe #6 and #18 would be better. And what’s with the Thabeet lovefest around here? I still think that he represents the highest risk for a bust in this draft – weak offensively and, other than in a straight zone where he’s just a goalie, his D will be pedestrian at best.

Anyway, I think we better fasten the seatbeats cuz this may just be the beginning!

by SoDakHmr on Jun 23, 2009 9:02 PM CDT reply actions  

If Rubio is still a target...

how much has this deal changed the dynamics of trading up? We may have just lowered the price for pick 2 by holding all the assets.

Short of Sacramento putting 4 & 23 on the table, who can do a better deal than 5 &18 for 2?

by Auswolf on Jun 23, 2009 9:05 PM CDT reply actions  

The best scenario for Memphis would be Jason Thompson + #4 for #2 + filler but I just don’t think that SacTown is that willing to get Rubio instead of Evans. I don’t see any other team with any sort of assets like we currently have.

by jballer_13 on Jun 23, 2009 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sac is the team to watch...

… they’ve got assets and seemed to want Rubio very badly. Then Rubio showed up and was “sick” and wouldn’t/couldn’t workout for them, so they still know as little about him as we do, at least in terms of a workout performance (I think they at least got to talk to him when he visited, whereas I don’t think we’ve even talked to him). I wouldn’t mind standing pat if, and only if, Harden slips to five. A Harden/Jennings or Harden/Holiday backcourt would give us the kind of scoring punch and athleticism or size (depending on if we would take Jennings or Holiday) we haven’t had in a long time.

by Shogun on Jun 23, 2009 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Even if they want Rubio, Thompson is a pretty big piece to give up if there is still a chance that they could get him at #4. I really believe they want him too but I don’t know if they’re willing to give up a solid player like Thompson when Evans also seems like a good prospect.

by jballer_13 on Jun 23, 2009 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great point...

and since Sacramento has apparently cooled on Rubio, have a center in Hawes, and a SG in Kevin Martin, it’s unlikely they’re willing to make that move.

I think #6 and #18 can get it done. Apparently, Grizzlies wanted #4 and Jason Thompson from Sac for #2…the offer of #6 and #18 is comparable.

I think Grizzlies would like Jordan Hill…an athletic PF to put next to Gasol. Hill will be avail at #6.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right. At this point, I actually feel bad for all the bad things I said about David Kahn (it’s tenuous, though, he actually has to make picks come Thursday ;) ).

The beauty of this is also that he did the deal without killing the cap. Songaila has 2 more years but at a modest contract, and Thomas and Pecherov are expirings. And Songaila probably has the most value to the Wolves, to boot, as a 3rd big. Obviously Miller and Foye are okay players who can help Washington win, but for a rebuilding team trying to raise its ceiling, they’re exactly the type of players that should be moved. Kevin McHale would have never, ever done this deal.

by jianfu on Jun 23, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Another point

This draft has a lot of depth, yet for sure star power after the 1st pick. ESPN’s Chad Ford’s draft poll of GM’s last week had something like 47 players under consideration for the 1st round – an unprecedented large number. Why? Because after Griffin, all the others have some superior skills coupled with at least one major question mark.

And we have 4 picks that ALL get guaranteed 3 year rookie scale contracts. We can’t add 4 guaranteed contracts – and the rest of the NBA knows that too. We are going to have to trade at least 1 (or a 2 for 1). But do you see that player out there that deserves to have us use that many assets? Do you think that other GM’s will be low balling us for those later picks if we do actually select 5 and 6? I certainly do.

So we have to make a deal. I am eager to see what we get.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 9:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Even then

Prior to the trade we had 11 under contract (which, by the way, does not include Carney). We did a 2 for 3 moving us to a net 12. Drafting 4 is 16 guaranteed – plus we can’t even use the 2nd rounders (who in a deeper draft may just be more valuable than 1st rounders)

Need to move/consolidate picks.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we draft Euros

then they don’t count towards cap/players total until they come over.

by McCleak on Jun 23, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Surely....

…Chris Wallace has to be coming to his senses about now to realize that he can’t take Rubio because it may blow up in his face; Thabeet doesn’t want to play there and they already have a center; Sacramento can sit tight and get Evans or Rubio….6 +18 should be enough. That’s Hill.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not necessarily...

If they take Calathes at 18, Jerebko or Casspi at 28, Kravtsov/Gladyr/Beaubois/De Colo/Llull at 45 and 47. I’m not saying this is what they should do, but there is more than one option here. The Wolves could draft and stash 4 Euros if necessary or pick a college kid in the second round and bring him to camp.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are always options

but now you’re not just focused on Best Player Available (what a team like the Twolves should be doing) but instead are trying to protect asset value.

We have traded expiring contract assets for a draft asset in a draft where we already had significant large number of draft assets.

Not sure that is wise which is why I still think we need to move some picks.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

…at 18. If a guy like Lawson, Hansbrough, Blair, or maybe even Clark or Daye are available, you grab them and figure it out later. 28 and beyond go to the Euros. I also agree that we’ll see more movement.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 23, 2009 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Songalia

Just doing a little research…Consistently knocks down over 40% of his 2-pt jumpers, which is more than can be said for Love or Jefferson. Also he tends to hold opposing PFs to pretty low PER numbers….just don’t play him at Center.

And Etan Thomas prior to the heart issues was a very solid banger off the bench and certainly more productive than Jason Collins or Michael Doleac. Perhaps he comes to camp fully recovered this season (?).

Not saying these guys excite me, I’m just saying with Love and Jefferson in the fold, these guys aren’t horrible backups.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 23, 2009 9:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Songaila's a pretty good backup

I wish we could have kept him. Doesn’t rebound much though.

You’ll immediately fall in love with how he plays. Fights hard, gets the most out of whatever he’s got.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually

not a bad comparison, though he is more athletic that Cardinal.

by Just A Fan on Jun 23, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

They're probably pretty similar, actually

Songaila might be a bit better on defense, but otherwise, pretty much the same.

You know you'll get devoured by Cheaney, Wallace, and Juwan Howard.

by Mike Prada on Jun 23, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Scouting report from DraftExpress on Songaila...

Overview: Songaila has established himself as a solid and versatile role player in the league, mainly thanks to his toughness and basketball IQ. He can operate as a face-up power forward and can be dangerous at times with his jump shot. Can also be tricky in the post, using shot-fakes and footwork to free himself for good looks at the basket. Gets used situationally against every frontcourt position.

Strengths: Songaila is most dangerous from the elbow to the baseline, 17 feet and in. He’s developed a fairly reliable mid-range jumper and does not lose effectiveness when guarded, which speaks to his rhythm shooting tendencies. Songaila has solid footwork in the post and likes to face-up against opponents. He’ll use spin moves and up-and-under tricks to get off difficult hook shots or bank shots off the glass, and is very crafty moving off the ball. Very good body control and good hands allows him to finish a lot of one-handed shots around the paint area. He’s an excellent passer, which helps make up for his other shortcomings.

Defensively, Songaila makes a strong effort defending the 4. He’s fairly strong at keeping his space and moving his feet to stay in front of drivers and uses his body to good effect when in the post. He’s willing to throw his body around to draw charges or commit hard fouls.

Weaknesses: Songaila is a below average player offensively, not bringing much in the ways of versatility or efficiency on this end. A streaky set shooter at times, really relies on putting the ball on the floor to get a feel for the basket. Doesn’t possess outstanding range either so his creativity on offense is limited primarily to within 17 feet of the basket, though he does hit a decent amount of catch-and-shoot opportunities around the FT line extended when moving into the shot. His lack of size and explosiveness gets exposed at times finishing at the rim, as he’s susceptible to having his shot blocked. He rarely gets to the free throw line.

Defensively, Songaila is prone to excessive fouling. He’s undersized, and doesn’t have the athleticism to necessarily compensate for that. His limited perimeter foot speed forces him to rely on physical defense with his body and he is whistled frequently for contact fouls on drives. While he uses spacing well to protect on drives, he is a liability when defending a face-up opponent who forces him to play tight on the jumper. Songaila has to pick his battles on the defensive side of the ball, sticking to his strengths. He’s not a great rebounder for his position.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 9:29 PM CDT reply actions  

DraftExpress on Thomas...

Overview: Thomas is a very efficient two-way player with the versatility to play both power forward and center. Though undersized, he is extremely aggressive and uses his powerful frame to back his man down, throw his elbows and shoulders around, and create space to get his shot off. Defensively, Thomas uses the same type of physical, frenetic, style to intimidate his opposition. He’s an excellent rebounder on both ends of the floor. Was forced to sit out the 07-08 season with a heart problem, but is scheduled to return in 08-09.

Offense: Thomas is effective in the post, using simple hook shots to score around the basket most often. He doesn’t have incredible footwork and is almost completely lacking any use of a jump-shot, but he is extremely effective at using his body to create space and has good finishing ability once he’s free for the score. Thomas is a strong player in the team offense as well. He uses basket cuts, pick-and-rolls, and offensive rebounds to get his points. Very intelligent on the court, usually makes the right read and understands his role, even if he’s a bit turnover prone. He gets to the free throw line at a decent rate, but shoots a very poor percentage once there.

Defense: Thomas is a harassing style of defender, a long, strong and athletic big man who aggressively bodies up on his man in the post or presses up on him when facing up. He’s not afraid to give the hard foul and he keeps active with his help defense. Thomas is a pretty solid weak-side shot-blocker and is solid on the defensive glass. Isn’t as comfortable when pulled out onto the perimeter, but gets away with a lot of body contact on drives, so he’s good at keeping face-up forwards shooting instead of driving. He’s slightly undersized for an NBA center.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 9:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Wizards fan here

You will love Songalia. However, despite any positive press your read on Etan or Pech, they are both no good. Etan routinely plays out of position and is a terrible help defender. Pech is a 7 footer who in the words of one Wizard scout “decided to stop rebounding in practice.”

I think this was pretty much a wash. If Sac is stupid enough to let Rubio fall, then you fleeced us. Otherwise, Harden or Curry wouldn’t have gotten us past the first round. Maybe Miller and Foye will help with that goal against the Crabdribblers.

Its always Roger Mason (Jr.) time!

by Sean Fagan on Jun 23, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Am I the only one who thinks this trade is absolutely HORRIBLE

for the Wolves. I mean, they give up their best shooters- and they don’t have many with Mike Miller and Randy Foye who are also the 2nd and 3rd best players on the team in my opinion.

In return they basically get three not-so-good PF/C’s and ONE pick.
Even if they’re able to get Rubio or Thabeet and Curry, I really wouldn’t trade that for Mike Miller and Randy Foye. Now they need help at the SG/SF position, so if they get Rubio or Thabeet, they could only get one of those, the best being probably DeMar DeRozan at both positions. I really wanted Curry so he could start at PG with Randy/Mike at SG, but now that doesn’t really work out. If he plays SG, then Bassy, who’s okay, would start instead.

I guess it makes (a lot of) sense for the Wizards, dump their worst players, and Wittman gets to coach Foye and Miller again. They also get a veteran 3-point ace and a great, young rising Randy Foye with a great shot.

Overall, I think this was a horrible trade for the Wolves and a great trade for the Wizards and now, I’m not very excited with Kahn as GM instead.

by KGMN on Jun 23, 2009 9:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Here's the thing

Foye and Miller were not going to be central parts of a good Wolves team. I myself don;t think much of Foye, but even if he’s better than I think he is…the Wolves are bad. They need great players. The draft is the way to get them. It’s possible they won’t get great players, or even players as good as Foye, but you have to try to roll the dice when you are in the Wolves position. If they were a playoff team, your point would work better.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jeezus I forgot about Foye and Wittman Together Again

It’s Randy vs. Randy in the sequel to Think Faster, Dammit!. This one should be subtitled “Stop Yelling at Me!”

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Headlines from the future...

“Wizards Guard, Assistant Involved in Scuffle”

Wizards reserve guard Randy Foye got into a shouting match with assistant coach Randy Wittman during practice Thursday and had to be held back by teammates.

“Randy and coach Wittman didn’t get along too well in Minnesota,” said Wizards swingman Mike Miller, who played with Foye and for Wittman last year as a Timberwolf. “I guess all of this frustration just built up inside of him and came out. He’s usually a laid-back guy.”

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we've got a new

Outside the Lines segment already on the way.

by PoorDick on Jun 23, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

What?

“Mike Miller and Randy Foye who are also the 2nd and 3rd best players on the team in my opinion.”

Lose any credibility to judge the trade with that comment.

Visit my D2 Baseball Blog - Northern Sun Baseball

by FishingMN on Jun 23, 2009 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

What, do you think Kevin Love is?

I don’t exactly know why you’re surprised with that.

by KGMN on Jun 23, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m no Kevin Love fan, but he’s the 2nd best player on the T-Wolves (at least for two more days).

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

You are in the minority

I think Foye is a good 6th man, worth something, but hardly important for a team like us. And Miller only has serious value if he shoots and he just wouldn’t shoot. I really wonder what the heck happened this past year but I don’t trust him to go back to his old ways.

I am THRILLED with this deal.

The goal isn’t to become a 35 win team and keeping Miller and Foye helps us get there if that.

by Django Z on Jun 23, 2009 10:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

At the end of the season, he actually did

start shooting more and he was scoring the shots too.

by KGMN on Jun 24, 2009 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'll agree to this extent

for next year- it has the possibility to be bad. It also makes the Number 5 pick a huge deal since they gave away their best 2 and 3 to get it. You’re also right in that if they don’t draft Stephen Curry I’m going to be dumbfounded and seriously questioning Kahn’s judgement. They are in desperate need of shooters and wings.

by Jose Cordoba on Jun 23, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, but if they draft Curry, he has to play SG, because...

the Wolves don’t have any! Carney and Brewer are the closest things, but they’re both SF’s.
However, they have 7 F/C’s which is about half of the roster. Why did they get all F/C’s from Washington?

by KGMN on Jun 24, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting Chad Ford/Bill Simmons chat

http://sports.espn.go.com/stations/player?id=4281524

Both these guys very down on Tyreke Evans (and the draft in general). Don’t think he’s a very good athlete, doesn’t finish above the rim.

Both big fans of Curry and Rubio.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 9:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I've hardly seen Rubio play...

so hype machines like that chat have a big influence on me. If he’s as good as they think, it’s a no-brainer to trade up.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Technical question: Etan Thomas has an early termination option and thus can't be traded before July 1st

Are the Wizards just picking who the Wolves want, then later the league approves the deal? How many different hats does the poor guy have to wear?

by Norsktroll on Jun 23, 2009 10:09 PM CDT reply actions  

That's what's holding up the trade...

Thomas has to sign something saying he won’t opt out. Then it will be finalized.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 23, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

Thomas is going to sign something agreeing to the trade tomorrow. Then it will be consumated. This is according to the ESPN article on the trade. He gets his trade bonus.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here it is...

need to find a way to get Rubio and Thabeet, without giving up Love or Jefferson. I’d take those 4, and 8 homeless men, and feel unbelievable about our future. The biggest contingency in making it happen is probably OKC and whether they would take Harden over Thabeet at #3. I assume we’d have to trade up to 2 (maybe for 6/18/Pekovic), draft Rubio, have OKC take Harden, and then have Sacramento take Evans, Curry, Holiday or Flynn.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed...

Move-up to #2 and draft Rubio. I’d like to see us get Thabeet as well, but then who is our SG? If OKC takes Thabeet, we should be happy with Harden. We’ll figure out a way to get a defensive minded center at some point. In the meantime, Big Al and K-Love will start.

This is a team with a future, unlike recent mess.

PG: Rubio/Telfair
SG: Harden/Brewer
SF: Gomes/Brewer
PF: Love/Rhino/Songaila
C: Big Al/Etan Thomas

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good point...

I hadn’t thought of that—Harden or Thabeet would likely fall to us at 5, if we’re able to trade 6 & change for 2, and Harden would be a great addition as well.

We’ve gotta get Rubio, now that we’re this close.

by Andy G on Jun 23, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

I don’t care: I hope its Rubio or bust at this point. 6 + 18 + a little more seasoning, if needed.

by jianfu on Jun 23, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

6+18+28????

Is that Too Much to give up?..I mean we would have two guarenteed first rounders then we can just draft 2 euro guys in the 2nd and store them like Mavrofedekalis or however you say it and Pekovic

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Argh

wrong buttoned myself.

I’d do that, but I don’t know that Memphis does. The 18 and 28 are of dubious value

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

WHY???

Why do we need Thabeet? He doesn’t fit this team, especially now that we have no (one) wing player and two back up PG’s. IF we trade up, it had better be for Rubio, otherwise take Curry and Harden at 5&6 and see what you can get for the rest of the picks, or draft & stash. If we trade up and draft thabeet, then we have (theoretically) our three best players at two positions. We need PERIMETER help, not more inside.

Sometimes the obvious is hidden.

by frankenhoops on Jun 24, 2009 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

If they trade Love and 18 for 2

that would be very interesting. I would then take Rubio and Harden. Then I would try to trade 6 to the Knicks (Curry) for Wil chandler (a desperately needed SF) and the 8, and hope Jordan Hill was there.

Rubio/Harden/Chandler/Hill/Jefferson.

You’d desperately need a couple of veteran perimeter guys to help out, but that would be a very interesting result.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 10:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Eric, I totally respect your basketball mind...

But Jordan Hill is an NBA disaster waiting to happen. Soft, poor finisher, and will get dominated at the NBA level.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 23, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Could be

I don’t claim an expertise in his game. He rebounded pretty well at Arizona, blocked some shots.

Frankly, having 3 picks in the top 10 is a massive risk. I suggested the manouver above, though I’m not sure I’d do it. I like the idea of a Rubio/Harden backcourt very much, though, and wouldn’t mind adding a guy like Chandler.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel like any move involving K-Love...

… would mean we’d be hoping Thabeet would drop to 5 and Al would move back to Pf.

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 23, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Thabeet won't fall to 5

at least, I can’t see it happening. I’ve been wrong before

by Eric in Madison on Jun 23, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you put a gun to my head...

… and asked me who the Thunder would pick if Rubio was off the board, I’d say Harden. That was my preconception going into the draft, and neither him nor Thabeet have done much since then to make me think otherwise.

That’s just my reasoning. It’ll be interesting to see who OKC grabs. It’s close between him and Harden.

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 23, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Totally agree with your vision...

of a Rubio / Harden backcourt. We can do it without giving up Love, however. As far as a 3, I would look back to the AZ desert for Chase Budinger @ 28. That guy is going to be the steal of the draft for someone. He has every physical tool known to man, and will flourish without the “Messiah” pressure he had in college. He was a total choker at U of A, but I think he will be an excellent pro.

I would bet $$$ right now that Budinger will be a better short and long-term pro than a guy like DeRozan.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 23, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice start

If the trade announced today was Foye+Miller+#6 to Memphis for #2 would many people be complaining? If not, then #5 and #6 to Memphis as the same deal. Make Memphis take on one of the contracts from the Wiz, or Cardinal, since 5&6 is a little much for 2 this year.

Then trade #18 and #28 to move up high enough to get Hansbrough, see what he can do for a year, and if he shows promise then next year Wolves can use Love in a deal to draft Cole Aldrich.

End Thursday with Rubio and Hansbrough and a couple more 2nd round Euros and it is a great start.

by Rumblebee on Jun 23, 2009 10:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Hansbrough?

Are you kidding me? Also, #5 and #6 for #2 is too much.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 23, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Trade up to Draft Rubio #2 then Curry @ either 5 or 6...

A Lineup like this would be a perfect Lineup to build a franchise team on.

PG – Rubio, Telfair
SG – Curry, Carney
SF – Gomes, Brewer
PF – Love, Songaila/Rhino
C – Jefferson, Thomas/Pecherov.

by Tony_O on Jun 23, 2009 11:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Is #5 & #6 too much for #2?

I agree it probably is, that is why I make Memphis take back a bad contract. That being said if the Wolves trade #5 and #6 to get #2 we won’t know for a couple years if it was a good trade. It ultimately comes down to who the Wolves pick. Assuming they take Rubio and he is as good as some say, it is a great move——if he is as bad as some others say it will be a bad move even if we don’t trade up and he falls to #5. Like Kahn says, this team needs a #1 and they may not be in position again to get one (win 40 games next year and Clippers get the Wolves #1).

I am assuming the Wolves will overpay a little to control their destiny (remember what happened the last time Foye was traded to see the value in controlling your destiny). Since they have 12 players now under contract with 6 picks on Thursday they can overpay a little…..they don’t need to stash three more Euros either.

by Rumblebee on Jun 23, 2009 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Let's examine what we now know about the draft...

1. LA Clippers are taking Blake Griffin
2. Memphis is in the shit. Wallace can’t take Rubio. Thabeet works for him, but has stated he doesn’t want to play there. They need a 4 or 5. Wallace loves the local kid Evans (for reasons past understanding…one basketball for him and Mayo?), but needs to get value for pick # 2. We give him # 6 and # 18. With # 6, he takes Jordan Hill and we get Rubio. With # 18, maybe a Mullens or Earl Clark type. Wallace can sell this.
BOTTOM LINE: We take Rubio.
3. OKC takes Thabeet. This is a stone cold lock. The infatuation with a hugely overpaid Tyson Chandler tells you all you need to know about OKC draft priorities. They want a huge, mobile basket protector and Thabeet is available at a fraction of Chandler’s price.
4. SAC – With Rubio gone, they go for need with a PG and totally overreach. My guess is Flynn or Holiday. Maybe Evans…
5. WOLVES – James Harden to fill out our backcourt of the future.
6. WOLVES – We draft Jordan Hill for Memphis

This scenario leaves us with:

1 – Rubio / Bassy
2 – Harden / Brewer / Budinger
3 – Gomes / Brewer / Budinger
4 – Love / Songaila / Rhino
5 – Al / Thomas / Pecherov

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 23, 2009 11:39 PM CDT reply actions  

If that scenario happens...

…which I think it could and we get Rubio and Harden by only giving up 18, I will buy season tickets on Friday. That would be a fun young team to watch. Thursday is going to be very interesting.

by twolvesgm on Jun 24, 2009 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

If we walk away from this draft...

with Rubio AND Harden, Kahn will deserve executive of the year!

by mnjayhawk on Jun 24, 2009 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_2198_small
Not another Spaniard... hold up... wot?
George_mikan_small
I was there the Night Anthony Morrow scored 42 points
Small
Not 'yet another spaniard'...
Small
Another Spaniard fan! thanks for this forum :)
Small
Rubio talking trash with Kobe

Recent FanPosts

Small
2/8 Wolves +7.5 at Memphis
Small
A Message to Any NBA Players, Relatives, Friends, Etc...
Small
Counting Down to Rubio's First Quadruple-Double: Kings Game Report Card
Me_small
Unofficial Game Thread
Small
CH hang night
Small
It's prediction time
Small
Video Collection Section Suggestion?
Ibanez_ps10-ltd_new_small
Good lord this site is slow...
Small
2/7 Kings +7 at Wolves

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    HOOPUS FAQ

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • Despairy Home Companion
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko
    • Weird, unhealthy Darko mania
    • les goûts et les couleurs ne se discutent pas
    • Basketball success makes character issues forgivable
    • Building the Boogie Bandwagon
    • Building the Dream....One Power Forward At A Time
    • Kids, Puppy Dogs, And Long Walks In The Park
    • SWITCH THE FLIP!!!
    • Team Red Pill.
    • December is Bunny Month. Survive it with insincerity and Merle Haggard.
    • Like having a really good seat at a beheading.
    • We've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we're not savages. We're Wolves fans, and Wolves fans are best at everything.
    • Getting Real Mythological
    • Trapped in Punxsawawney
    • BIIYYYOOOMMMBOOOOOOO!!!
    • Estoy llevando mi talento a Minnesota
    • Where sharks do battle with giant eagles
    • You don’t put a saddle and reins on a magical unicorn, you bareback it and put faith in nature
    • Toeing the line between nerd and loser

    Hoopus Recipe Book

    Let's Settle This:


    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Journey_small Stop-n-Pop

    Rviy7fbgmhz5ht2dpgo6q0jfu_small TimAllen

    Editors

    Wolveslogo_small Oceanary

    Authors

    Small SG

    Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler