Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Draft Wrap-Up

A23f90807afee8ebca2fd6dbb290c27b-getty-86343355jp006_draftportraits_medium

Well folks, I'm going to turn in for the night but before I go I just wanted to put up a few quick thoughts about the draft.


First of all, let's take a quick run-down of who is on the team:

Point guards:

  1. Ricky Rubio
  2. Jonny Flynn
  3. Sebastian Telfair
  4. Nick Calathes
  5. Bobby Brown

Shooting guards:

  1. Wayne Ellington
  2. Corey Brewer

Forwards/centers:

  1. Al Jefferson
  2. Ryan Gomes
  3. Kevin Love
  4. Mark Madsen
  5. Craig Smith
  6. Darius Songaila
  7. Etan Thomas
  8. Oleksiy Pecherov
  9. Henk Norel
  10. Brian Cardinal

Obviously, some of these guys aren't going to play even if they're with the team.  Madsen, Norel, Pecherov, and Bobby Brown are all 12th-15th men at best.  If the status quo remains (and it won't), the Wolves could probably get by with buying out someone like Brown or Madsen. 

Getting around to the elephant in the room, the Wolves selected 4 guards, 3 of them points.  The bottom line here, for me, is that a 24-win team with a starting back court of Bobby Brown and Sebastian Telfair (yes, that's what they were looking at before the draft) took the 2 top players on their draft board (who were guards) and they didn't have to move anything to do so.  That's it.  If they had traded 5 and 6 for Rubio we'd all be sitting here excited about the young Spaniard.  They got the kid at 5 and their BPA at 6.  Even if the Wolves were a loaded team (and they're not), how can you possibly argue against a draft where a team with two top 10 picks gets their top 2 guys?  You'd take that every year if you could. 

Since most of us are Minnesotans, we are imbued with a deep lack of self worth and we must consciously resist the knee-jerk reaction of looking too much into Rubio's body language after the pick, his dad's comments about staying in Europe, or tall tales of the big city Knicks doing everything they can to get what the Wolves have in hand: the most exciting player in the draft.  Right now, enjoy the moment.  Instead of worrying about it, think of all of those times you dialed up Rubio on YouTube hoping he'd land at the Target Center.  Think of waking up early to watch the Spain/USA Gold Medal game.  If Rubio is going to play in Minny, the only way he was going to do so was to land in the Wolves' laps with the 5th pick.  It happened.  Enjoy it.  Let's worry about the buyout, trades, and staying in Europe later.  The main thing I'm worried about right now is when I can get my hands on a pair of Rubio shirts for my girls.

Getting around to what we will see on the court, who here thinks that Rubio can run the point better than Randy Foye?  OK, good.  Now, who here thinks that Jonny Flynn is an upgrade over Sebastian Telfair or Bobby Brown?  OK, good.  Keep in mind that David Kahn just traded Mike Miller and Randy Foye--two players who would have been gone after the season--for Ricky Rubio.  Keep in mind that had the Thunder went with Rubio we would be talking about Harden and Flynn.  Could the Wolves have made out better with Curry?  I think so but it's hardly a lopsided set of circumstances. 

Moving down the draft, the Wolves picked up a serviceable shooting guard at 28 (Ellington) and they will hopefully hang on to Nick Calathes with their top 2nd round pick.  Again, going back to the bottom line: a team that was looking at a starting back court of Bobby Brown and Sebastian Telfair at the start of the day walked away with 4 solid guards.  They did so in a draft nearly completely void of shooting guards.  Could they have reached for DeRozan at 6? Sure, but let's not forget that this draft was beyond thin at that position.  It was thin at center.  What it did have is a bunch of decent power forwards and a bunch of decent point guards.  Here's what I think we're looking at in terms of a rotation:

  1. Rubio/Bassy
  2. Flynn/Ellington
  3. Gomes/Brewer
  4. Love/Songaila
  5. Jefferson/Thomas

I 100% believe that is not what we'll see, but even if it is, it's not a bad thing.  This team still has a huge amount of assets to move around in the off-season and before the trading deadline.  They have Calathes and Pekovic with European contracts; they have millions of dollars in expiring contracts; they have 2 of the highest rated point guards in the draft; they have serviceable players like Gomes and Smith that can be moved.  If there is one thing I would like people to take away from this draft it is this: You cannot grade this draft until next season's draft.  The Wolves are a 24-win team and they can't upgrade everything at once.  What they can do--and what they did--is gather as many BPAs as possible in the draft, amass future assets (future 1st for Lawson), and maintain roster flexibility.  Remove any names from the picks and ask yourself this: If I were to tell you that the Wolves picked up 2 stashed Euro contracts, the 2 best players on their draft board, and a possible 2010 1st rounder, would you have signed on to that outcome?

OK, that about does it for now.  There are some legitimate concerns about this draft and we will deal with them in the next week or so.  Right now, enjoy it.  The guy you watched in the Olympics and on YouTube has been drafted by your favorite club.

UPDATE: Calathes was traded as I wrote this.

0 recs  |  Comment 201 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Canis Hoopus

Bench buddies

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 90 comments

Lessons from Mark

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 276 comments

Hoopus lessons from the past

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 73 comments

Recapping Al

Mar 2010 by Stop-n-Pop - 20 comments

Comments

Display:

Amen

At least someone is happy, reading the board you’d think the wolves just traded all their #1’s for Vin Baker. I agree SNP with your analysis, before tonight if wolves fans would have known we’d get Rubio, Flynn, Ellington, 2010 first rounder higher than 18, Calathes, without trading any of the other wolves assets, everyone would have been stoked! By the way, having Rubio makes Calathes redundant in my view, so no big problems with trading the him to dallas for a future 2nd and cash…

Who knows, maybe New York sends David Lee to Memphis, we send Flynn to NY, and Memphis sends us Thabeet… what a coup that would be. Rubio and Thabeet at #5&6….

by DR_JPK on Jun 26, 2009 12:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not stoked

If I would have known that we were going to draft 2 pg’s at 5&6, which may I remind you in no way solves the problem of our backcourt which every analyst said we were going to. Getting 2 pg’s who always need the ball in their hands is stupid. Passing on Curry like Dicky V said will come back to haunt us. Why? Because he can play off the ball. If you look at Jonny Flynn and Rubio’s highlights they always have the ball in their hands. When you watch Curry’s you see him coming off screens without the ball and spot up shooting. So I don’t see how wolves fans should be stoked. I do think that the wolves did good in getting Rubio, and getting Ellington was a fantastic pick. But drafting Flynn is stupid plain and simple. And in my honest opinion I don’t think SNP thinks we did as good as he writes. As I read this article I felt like he was grasping at straws to find positives. Which there are, but all I know is we had 6 draft picks 3 will be on our team this season and 2 play the same position, so out of our 6 picks we maybe got 2 starters, and one would probably be Ellington our 24th pick not the 6th or the 18th. So in regards to your comment that "everyone would have been stoked." No they are not. Not drafting Curry was a HUGE mistake.
Unless a trade happens to get us a better 2 or 3 I think wolves fans everywhere got "Kahned" by thinking our first 2 picks would address our backcourt instead of waiting till our 4th pick to sure up our backcourt.

by mr.right on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Solid points

I do think the Curry thing is a big mistake and I will have a post on that later today. I give them a pass in terms of a 24-win team selecting the bpa at every pick regardless of position and then figuring out what to do with the value later. I think the problem isn’t the process, rather the idea that they had Flynn rated above Curry.

I also don’t think the ball-in-hand argument works in favor of Curry over Flynn. Curry was far more ball dominant than Flynn. As much as I like the guy, I’ve always pitched him in terms of him being a massively ball-dominant guard who could run the pick and roll. Curry led the NCAA in usage with 38% of his team’s possessions. Flynn was way down at 310 with 25.2%. He played with two other guards who factored in a lot on possessions, Devendorf and Harris. I don’t think this is the problem with Flynn vis-a-vis Curry. The problem is that Curry was simply a better scorer and has a much better chance of running in an offense as the guy who comes off screens a’la Rip Hamilton or who can hit the catch-and-shoot. His off-the-ball scoring potential is just so much more high-end than Flynn. That being said, perhaps they have something specific in mind when it comes to running these guys together. I just don’t see how they could have rated Flynn anywhere near Curry as the BPA.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

It isn’t that Flynn is terrible, he’s just not #6 pick material in this draft, unless you ignore stats and trust your “gut” and what your eyes tell you.

Flynn over Curry is a very anti-stats, old-school pick. That scares the crap out of me.

I do think Kahn gets how to work the complexity of contracts and the cap to some extent, which is a big step forward for the franchise. I had hoped he would use that intellectualism to also embrace and use statistical analysis, but the Flynn pick says “No.”

by Django Z on Jun 26, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats...

…what stats are you looking at? I’m not sure how you factor in the difference between the Southern Conference and the Big East. I’m not saying that makes Flynn better than Curry, but using stats in this case shouldn’t be the basis. I think Flynn does a lot of things better than Curry. Curry is obviously the better shooter, but really, I feel he is rather one dimensional.

by rencito on Jun 26, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are a number of places...

…you can look for statistical analysis of the two players:

http://www.hoopsanalyst.com/0809ew7.htm
http://www.hoopsanalyst.com/0809ew8.htm
http://www.basketballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=272
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft2009/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=DraftRater-090618&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnba%2fdraft2009%2finsider%2fcolumns%2fstory%3fcolumnist%3dhollinger_john%26page%3dDraftRater-090618
http://www.wagesofwins.com/PGDraft09.html
http://sonicscentral.com/apbrmetrics/viewtopic.php?t=2248&highlight=jonny+flynn

Across the board Curry is viewed as someone with solid shooting skills, the ability to hang on the ball, and who excels in several scoring situations that are prominent in the NBA. He’s not as good as a point as Flynn but he is a better scorer with capable point skills. Flynn is an interesting player but Curry is not that one dimensional. There are some very good positives with Flynn and we will run them down in a future post.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a thought

This is just a thought it doesn’t hold any merit but is there any way that the wolves thought curry would fall to the Knicks and drafted Rubio to trade to the Knicks for curry and David lee or somebody like that???

This is just a thought after listening to espn and them talking about the knicks wanting rubio. And maybe I just really want to think that the wolves wanted curry, but golden state messed up their plans, but idk. Any thoughts??

by mr.right on Jun 26, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so...

…I think the board was Rubio, Evans, Flynn, Curry.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

RUBIO! i was so shocked and happy that he fell into our laps

If Flynn can play the 2 next year then i will be ok with that pick, but if not then i hate it. and DR JPK i hope that trade happens

Vikings have signed Brett Favre!!
T-Wolves lets trade up to get Rubio

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well put...

Incomplete is the appropriate grade. I’m somewhat worried about Rubio and would’ve rather they kept Calathes, but the guys they moved were for assets in a deeper draft and to teams who are at the moment questionable to make the playoffs next year. Picking Flynn instead of Curry is mildly disappointing, but if they do play him and Rubio together (I’m not completely convinced), it’s at least an interesting concept in theory.

Ellington? Not sure if he’s a better pick than Taylor or Budinger (Dork Elvis snatching them up quickly gives me pause), but he can score and make shots. Norel’s worst-case scenario, according to DraftExpress, is Oberto; if he stays for a couple of years and comes over, maybe it’s an underrated asset. It looks like 2-3 of these guys will be in camp, which is a good number for roster space. Plus, they’ll have a high second-rounder again next year, barring an unexpected playoff run.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hell Yes

Who cares, we got Rubio!!!!! He is going to be great for the organisation, not just on the court, but getting more and more people to cames and hopefully some airtime (living in Australia means I don’t see many Wolves games but this should change).

Look, I’m still not certain about the whole Flynn thing but what I will say is this: Flynn, by all accounts, is damn talented. If there are two rookie PGs that can play together, it will be Flynn and Rubio.

For me, the next move has to be for a starting 3 and another SG. AK47 and Kyle Korver would be ideal, Gerald Wallace and Raja Bell would be another awesome combo. Its that combination of a SG that can actually shoot and a SF that can contribute everywhere, but mainly on perimeter defense, that I feel will ultimately dictate if/how well Flynn and Rubio fit together.

And thank you everyone for all the comments throughout today, loving watching the draft at 10am.

Go Wolves!!!

by easeus on Jun 26, 2009 12:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Never realized he had Fans in Australia

how do people down there feel about Patty Mills getting drafted?

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another Aussie here

Mills is a solid PG and did as well at the Olympics as one could expect (put 20pt on the Dream Team). Is Portland a good fit? Rodriguez leaving is a bonus (what does Evans do at Sacto now?) but Mills is still behind Blake and Bayless at the very least. My feeling is he struggles for a contract at Portland to be honest. He should have stayed at St. Mary’s one more year.

He is only the second Aboriginal to get drafted to the NBA (the other is Toronto’s Nathan Jawai) and both are from Thursday Island, which is a quirk in itself.

It’s a shame Joe Ingles didn’t get picked up. I suggest the Wolves get him over for Summer League. he can play the NBA three, he has length and can shoot.

by Auswolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope Mills makes it somewhere

He can really play, no one really got the chance to watch him that much this year but he is a pretty good talent

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes. I need to cheer up

They got the guy I absolutely thought they needed to get out of this draft, the guy who at least has a chance to be a franchise changing talent. And they did it without having to move up. That’s great.

I think Flynn was a wasted pick, not just on a fit level, but because I don’t think he can play, but they got Rubio, and that’s what matters.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 26, 2009 12:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Flynn

Why don’t you think this guy can play? He has an impressive resume of games last year with Syracuse and a 40 inch vertical… I know Sacramento was close to taking him. Bilas had him high up, Hollinger had him pretty high. We’ll see if my AI comparison is overdone, he just kinda reminds me of AI with his size, quickness, and toughness…

by DR_JPK on Jun 26, 2009 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the Iverson comparison

Because it means Flynn has game. I think his stongest asset is leadership — which is not Iverson, so I’m happy about that.

I’m not happy thinking that the vision is Flynn and Rubio playing together. It’s kinda like my feelings about starting Love and Jefferson as your 4 & 5. There’s a fine line between vision and hallucination sometimes.

by levi_mn on Jun 26, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like the fact that the biggest arguments for him are intangibles.

Players like that always make me horribly nervous. He’s got other assets to him… I wish those would get as much play as “He’s a tough, nice guy with tons of leadership ability.”

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 26, 2009 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other reasons not to like Flynn

— Some of his stats are inflated from Syracuse’s up-tempo pace and the astounding number of minutes that he averaged.

— His stock increased significantly not from his play in actual games but from off-season workouts and interviews.

by Sulla on Jun 26, 2009 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, me neither.

I feel like we just drafted Nate Robinson, with the caveat that he’s a nice guy instead of a jackass.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 1:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Iverson comparison has a downside

Flynn absolutely projects as a ball-dominant guard. Rubio also needs the ball.

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

40 inch vertical

Is alot more impressive on a 6’ 4" player.

When you’re 6 foot it doesn’t mean so much.

by Django Z on Jun 26, 2009 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rubio and Flynn

Man these guys can really start making Brewer look good in the open court, especially Rubio. If Brewer comes back healthy, he’ll have dunk after dunk in transition and be a lockdown defender on the perimeter to help the undersized back-court.

by DR_JPK on Jun 26, 2009 12:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A PG makes anyone look good

I think the grade would be incomplete and that Flynn’s an asset to be moved, but there is just no question that good PG play will be like leavening to this team’s prospects. The last two years we spent significant time starting a multi-headed collection of sorta PGs — Telfair, Foye, Jaric, etc. — just to get Al Jefferson position in the post. Jefferson suddenly has some actual points to deliver the ball. Kevin Love’s court vision is going to look a lot better with people hitting him in flow.

This team has literally been without a point guard of any quality for seasons at a time. Telfair, who’d played himself out of the rotation for two other franchises, had become the de facto starter due to lack of competition.

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, we got Rubio.

It’s definitely a net gain. Maybe I’m underestimating Flynn, at least his scouting report indicates he finishes well and is good at drawing fouls.

The Lawson trade was a good move.

The Calathes trade makes me sad.

Wayne Ellington was a good pickup.

I wish we had Steph Curry, but hell, we have RICKY RUBIO! People might actually care about the Wolves next year. My girlfriend might actually watch.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Haha she might watch just to watch Ricky

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Who's that? He's so cute!"

Her exact words tonight. She won’t be the only one.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My daughter too

Rubio is going to have that “it” factor. No doubt at all.

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Explain to me how the Lawson trade is a good move

I completely understand how Lawson doesn’t fit after Bassy, Rubio and Flynn. But how is using the 18th pick to get the 15th (guessing, obviously) next year a good deal when Lawson at 18 is a steal? If we get a better player than Lawson with that pick I will be shocked, fit be damned. Value is value and we just pissed away Lawson and Calathes for a box of rocks. Right? Convince me other wise. Please, convince me otherwise.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 2:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think of it this way

We had that pick as a catalytic one, meant to facilitate trades like a move up for Rubio. This year Rubio fell to us. We could have used that choice and locked down another rookie contract, but instead — because the draft was deeper than touted and we got decent value at #18 — we kicked the can ahead and possibly improved it somewhat in what promises to be a somewhat more topheavy, if not necessarily deeper, draft class.

Next year we may well be able to bump a pick up in pursuit of Greg Monroe, or someone like that, because of that move.

(My guess is that a Flynn-and-#18-for-Evans trade was intended, but didn’t come through because the right guy didn’t last to #18….. Perhaps now the Wolves are resisting tossing in the Charlotte pick in the same trade instead, because it’s better than the expected return? We don’t know.)

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you go look...

…at DX’s 2010 mock, something like 16 out of the 1st 20 projected picks are shooting guards, small forwards, or 4/5s. 6 of these guys are wings. This year’s draft had so many point guards in the 1st round, they took the bpa at 18 and turned it into a similar-range pick in a draft of a different color.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the critical point.

Were there more than one shooting guard in this draft with a reasonable worst-case floor, the play would have been very different. If we landed Nice Nate Robinson, who cares? Someone has to score on our second unit, for crying out loud. Who would it have been? If Rubio and Flynn play ten minutes per across the court from each other and 15-20 mins without the other, we’ll barely notice. Picking up a potentially transcendent point and a guy with serious sixth man potential is a hell of a draft, no matter what we do with it from here.

by TheH on Jun 26, 2009 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

“Nice Nate Robinson”

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you really post this at 5am? Damn, you must have been excited.

Also, the protections on the Charlotte trade (top 12 next year) make it likely that we wind up with a higher pick than what we had this year in what is being called a much better draft. 18 this year, or 14 next year? No brainer, in my opinion. I love smart moves that defer value and flexibility to another year, especially one where our pick may potentially be in jeopardy.

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

We need to stay as excited as we were when Rubio’s name was called.

I think Kahn did a fantastic job with 4 of the 6 picks (Rubio, trading 18 for a likely higher pick in a deeper draft next year, Ellington and Calathes, who I wish we’d kept).

Flynn is a stud, but a Flynn/Rubio backcourt is troublesome and the uncertainty of it all is killing me. Hopefully, we can move one of them for a talented wing. I posted this yesterday and wish we would have followed up on it today. In retrospect, I wish we had drafted Curry at #6 and taken Knicks offer of #8 and Wilson Chandler and then drafted DeRozan. I realize DeRozan could be a bust, but he has huge upside and Chandler would be a solid starting SF for us. That would have left us with:

PG: Rubio/Bassy
SG: DeRozan/Brewer/Ellington
SF: Chandler/Gomes/Brewer
PF: Love, Rhino and too many to name
C: Big Al, Etan Thomas

But I’ve liked moves Kahn has made so far so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and see how Rubio/Flynn situation works out.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 26, 2009 12:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Who knows if that Knicks offer of Chandler and #8 ever really existed thought?

It was just a rumor. But if that were some sort of standing offer, then obviously we would have done well to take it.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

true...

may have been bs…but it seemed like Knicks really wanted Curry and I think if we’d drafted him, Golden State would have taken Hill.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 26, 2009 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm, deeper draft?

Not to be confrontational, but look at who is drafted 13-18 most years. Isn’t Lawson likely to be better than almost all of them? I fully realize you can pull out guys like Granger and Reggie Miller, but it seems to me Lawson was a steal and we traded him for a pick likely to be a lesser player. And, if we are just going to give away Calathes, why not use 18 and 45 to get something better than a teens pick next year and a little Cuban $$$$ or a 2nd rounder who will never make the team?
 In my mind we had huge value at 6, 18, and 45 and pissed it away. I hope I am wrong, but come on, the 6, Lawson and Calathes turns into what? Flynn, a bust at 15 next year, and ‘future considrations’ from Cuban? I find it hard to believe that those 3 slots shouldn’t have been much better.
 Rubio and Ellington are as good as I could have hoped for. Henk is a total waste, and the other 3 picks have been largely pissed away.
 Prove me wrong. Please.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't - Yet.

I don’t see how you can possibly think that the person we are going to pick at 15 next year is going to be a total bust. Lawson COULD be very good in the NBA and was the third wheel in our PG heavy draft. Who’s to say that #15 in 2010 becomes part of a trade to get us #5 or #2 next year? So then we’ve traded Lawson for Cole Aldrich. . . Any complaints about that?

I understand taking BPA and a number of us have said that position be d*^%!, we are a 24 win team and we need to take the BPA and according to the Wolves board, Flynn was better than Curry. I personally don’t see it, but Kahn has made some decent moves so far and I will give him the benefit of the doubt. At least it wasn’t McHale drafting where this negativity would be justified.

Sometimes the obvious is hidden.

by frankenhoops on Jun 26, 2009 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Henk helps Rubio adjust, it's far from a waste.

We want this kid to be happy enough to stay in the NBA and in the US.

by TheH on Jun 26, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Resign Carney?

We need somebody who can go up and fetch those alley oops all our PGs will be throwing up. Right now Brewer is the only one who even slightly falls into that category.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i really hope we keep Carney

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

And if we get Rubio over this season, do we keep Brown on or buy him out?

I also wonder about Pecherov – makes about 1.5m this season and continues the tradition of a 7’ stiff on the end of the bench

Doleac – Collins – Pecherov.

by Auswolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The draft was, if anything, very entertaining.

The OKC and Sacto picks had me nervous beyond belief. Even though I constantly have gone out of my way to try and dismiss Rubio landing here… some part of me still wanted him to drop. Nearly lost my shit when Sacto picked Evans. My brother (not a big NBA wonk) called right after the Evans pick and had been watching the draft. I was honestly talking a mile a minute at that point. When they announced Rubio, I let out a yell the entire block could hear.

Flynn got a little different reaction. Even so, it was damn exciting and a wild ride throughout the remainder of the draft… and it was the same for someone who had only a passing interest in the Wolves and the NBA. Rubio can definitely bring in new fans. I’m cautiously optimistic about him finally suiting up for the Wolves. Lets see what the rest of the summer holds.

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 26, 2009 12:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

My thoughts exactly

only, as usual, expressed much more eloquently than I could.

Stern isn’t going to let his boy Kahn botch the Rubio situation. Worst case scenario, he becomes a big chip in a major trade, with the 2nd or 3rd best PG in a PG-rich draft still here.

Obviously the Wolves weren’t as high on DeRozan or Curry as some of us were.

Obviously the rest of the world wasn’t that high on Calathes.

This was a craptacular draft, but we got the most exciting player in it.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 12:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

On another note...

Guess which team could have 6 picks (their own 1st and 2nd, Charlotte’s and Utah’s 1st, Dallas’ and Houston’s 2nd) in next year’s draft?

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 12:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Who?

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing of note:

Minnesota sports have just added Brett Favre and Ricky Rubio. I think we’ll get a little more national media attention, no?

Also: Brett Favre. Ricky Rubio. 5 letter first and last names. O_O

by Kevin Loves McHale's Navy on Jun 26, 2009 12:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And they'll likely be..

….both in Mankato this summer. Mankato, MN: Center of the Sports Universe ;)

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Vikings and Timberwolves both added the most talented players in their drafts

Percy Harvin and Ricky Rubio, i love these 2 kis

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

*kids

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Add to that

the Twins got a pitcher with #1 starter quality stuff fall to them at 22! now lets see if the Wild can get a truley dynamic player in the draft tonight and the quadrecta will be complete!

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Jun 26, 2009 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa!

"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"

by VikesFaninNM on Jun 26, 2009 12:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Woops

Hit the wrong button!

But anyways…..

Rubio?

F’in SWEET! It seems that a guy who I had doubts about as a GM suddenly seems aggresive enough to go after players he thinks will get us back into the playoffs in a few years. I would be suprised by a day/night change tho would be happy, but this rebuiliding of a lackluster (McHales sinking Navy)rebuilding has me thinking the ship might be corrected and maybe….just maybe, Taylor has his head unstuck from being firmly planted in his arse. Will Rubio be the answer? Who knows, but can’t be any worse then what has transpired in the last 2/3 years. I say let’s see what happens and hope for the best. In the least, I am being optimistic that things might soon chage for the good again!

"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"

by VikesFaninNM on Jun 26, 2009 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I went to high school with Flynn

Hes a great guy from a great family. If the T-wolves decide to keep him, they will have a great player im sure. Hes smart and really wants to try hard and do good.

"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"

by firstPick on Jun 26, 2009 12:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So can he play the 2 then?

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not in the NBA.

Flynn is a touch over 5’11". That’s short for PG. Forget about SG.

by levi_mn on Jun 26, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We know

He’s a good guy and good leader. That’s not the problem.

He isn’t a great shooter, he passes okay and doesn’t play great defense and he’s only 6 foot. And we just spent the #6 pick in the draft on him. That we drafted him that high isn’t his fault, but our concern is very understandable.

by Django Z on Jun 26, 2009 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve heard he’s an excellent perimeter defender. Can’t speak from personal experience, but apaprently he’s really hard-nosed, has a good wingspan, great strength and really puts effort into stopping his guy on the perimeter. He’s probably guarding 1’s, but I seem to recall reports saying he handled Evans as well as anyone in the workout. We’ll definitely see if that’s true next year, but from the sound of things he’ll be a huge upgrade over Bassy defensively.

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at the numbers I posted below
Flynn got to the rim 8.8 times per game, which accounted for a lot of his scoring, but his 1.24 PPP in unguarded catch and shoot situations and .94 PPP on pull up jumpers are both very respectable.

Curry was 1.33 PPP in unguarded catch and shoot situations. Flynn is an above average shooter.

by Ebomb on Jun 26, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Randy Foye has now been traded for both Brandon Roy and Ricky Rubio, hopefully we can get the favor returned from the Blazers and the Wiz can pay it forward.

by Ebomb on Jun 26, 2009 12:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s funny, E. Poor, ego-whipped Randy. And he has to play for Wittman again.

by levi_mn on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we really can't hate the Flynn pick until we see what we do in FA

adding SG Ben Gordon will make me very happy

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 12:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Umm, what?

Even in a crappy draft you want the 6 to be a starter on a playoff team. Adding Ben at nearly 8 figures means we just pissed away the 6 on a 20 minute a night guy and devalued Bassy to a future 2nd rounder at best. Several teams wanted Curry, so how do we lose by drafting him to trade to them for theor pick and anything else? Bottom line – unless Flynn is clearly a much better player than everybody picked in the top 20 we choked.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmmm

I’m not a fan of Rubio and Flynn together. And Rubio isn’t either it seems. Personally, I think he was more upset about the second PG pick than coming to MN. He said he wanted to go to a place where he gets a lot of playing time and where he can have some young teammates to grow with. MN was exactly that until we drafted Flynn. And while I think he is a tremendous talent, what were we thinking?! I agree with trading down and getting Henderson, DeRozan, etc and picking up another asset along with them. But I absolutely do not see 2 ball dominant PGs working out together at the same time.
My hope: Rubio’s dad was talking more about the contract as a reason Rubio will not be here next season than the team. He comes over in 2010 and we have Flynn as a solid backup or trade him at max value (which hopefully is not now…)
Kahn… you better pull something amazing off here or you just got posted as worse than McHale. You got us 5 though…but you might have thrown Foye and Miller away for a forced Rubio giveaway. Bidding war anyone?

by Mplax on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nope

His buyout will be the same next summer unless he reach an agreement with DKV. It would take 2 years to land Rubio. Of course this is THE problem with Rubio. He would have played even for Memphis. But a #5 and a small market is a bad combination regarding Rubio’s financial situation.

by Bend3r on Jun 26, 2009 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just saw an interview he did right after the draft where he says

that he didn’t mind where he played so long as he new that he’d get minutes. He also said he was really confused with the wolves taking two pgs and hopes that they are planning a move. He also talked about playing this year, so I think he’ll try to go to the NBA.

by fanfaraway on Jun 26, 2009 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He even said he'd play for free

Probably a bit of hyperbole on his part but let’s hope he follows through on his desire to play in a place that gives him minutes.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone else confused about 18?

BJ Mullens woulda been a nice backup for center? Blair woulda been nice cuz his knee problems seem blown out of proportion (but we will see… I obviously have not seen the x-rays the pros have). NOT drafting 2 pgs and keeping Lawson would have been astounding!

by Mplax on Jun 26, 2009 1:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The pick we traded Lawson for next year will be higher, probably.

And in what is generally perceived as a better draft. Furthermore, there’s a limit to how many rookies you realistically want on your team in one year.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kinda

Yeah we don’t necessarily want 4 rookies, but what are the odds are the player we select next year is better than Lawson? Slim I think.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I realize you're down on losing Lawson

and I’m not sure the player picked next year is “better,” but I’m pretty sure it won’t be a point guard. This was a really crappy draft. Even in good ones, the player at 18 isn’t an impact player, and often gets bounced out of the league eventually. So I think the Wolves looked at the board when the pick came up, realized that they didn’t want another point guard, didn’t like what else was available at that slot, got a call from Denver, and decided to take a chance that they’ll get a bigger, better player (wing or a center) with the pick in next year’s draft.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 6:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a cap-smart move, as well.

It’s not just the X’s and O’s of playing that many rookies, it’s how it completely creates a logjam that makes you do things you otherwise would hate to do. Having the potential to own two drafts in a row is pretty effin exciting.

by TheH on Jun 26, 2009 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a team run by Michael Jordan...

When we get it, it will definitely be better than #18. We just might not get it for a few years…

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 26, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Kahn's plan is to avoid free agents

Drafts – done for this year. Wolves picked up better than average players, some picks for later years, even a little cash (likely totalling several million).

Trades – Wolves have expiring contracts that are valuable to teams looking for cap space, especially for next year’s “free agent bonanza”. Finding players that can contribute to the Wolves and that are worth their salary is key. Etan Thomas is likely one — if healthy. Songaila may be as well.

by levi_mn on Jun 26, 2009 1:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So..

… please identify the free agents we might sign. Seriously. How much money can we clear and who is even remotley likely to sign here. Run it through. Or don’t. End result – Kobe, Lebron, Wade, Melo, Bosh are not ever going to be Wolves. So, if we are going to maximize our resources we can’t worry about getting any of those guys but need to concentrate on getting value in the draft. Which, it seems we’ve haven’t.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 2:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're not going to go the free agent route...

…it will be via trade. They’re not going to clear cap space by letting guys go. They’re going to find something along the lines of Richard Jefferson or Vince Carter. That’s how it will have to happen. They can’t max someone out. There’s just no good way to make that happen. Expiring contracts are the way to go and they have put themselves in a fantastic position to do that, either over the summer or during the year.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They should be able to find an athletic wing to fill the lane using that cap flexibility. Gerald Wallace anyone?

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

.. I know we have a lot of expirings and I know the roster is changing dramatically by Septmember. I just don’t think we got the proper value yesterday. Who would have traded UP for Flynn? Nobody. Is Flynn really the best we could have done? And is a future teens pick the best we get for Lawson? And is damn near nothing the best we get for Calathes? To me Lawson at 18 and Calathes at 45 are steals and what we got for them is less value. I cannot believe that 6, Lawson and Calathes got us a likely back-up wing next year, a hug from Cuban, and a 5’11" PG who can jump real high and smile real big. I want Flynn to be awesome, but I don’t see it. What I can see is the Knicks drooling over Curry. It is hard to think we aren’t a better team extracting something from the Knicks and still ending up with Flynn or something else as good.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great Draft

There are a few ways I see this playing out, and none of them are all that bad:

1. Rubio comes around, decides to play here. We play him and Flynn in the backcourt together. And the fact that they are both talented, dynamic, unselfish guards with different skill sets (one’s a great passer, the other a great penetrator), trumps the fact that neither is listed as a “shooting guard.” If this backcourt experiment works, the Wolves are one of the funnest teams in the league to watch, and improve leaps and bounds.

2. Rubio comes around, decides to play here. We find that him and Flynn DON’T fit together in the same backcourt. We start Rubio at the point and either Ellington or another pick up at shooting guard, and Flynn becomes one of the league’s best backups.

3. Rubio DOESN’T come around, refuses to play here. We trade him for a good starting 2 guard and a future first round pick. (Maybe more, who knows what we get out of him?) Flynn becomes the team’s long-term starting point guard, and we go on rebuilding.

by LoveTo on Jun 26, 2009 1:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Drafting Flynn,

while confusing at the time, has put is in great position to come out of this draft with two good guards (either him and Rubio, or him and whomever we trade Rubio for).

by LoveTo on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but using the number 6 pick on a backup point guard on a 20 something win team..

.. can only be considered an epic failure. So scenario 2 is an unmitigated disaster, especially when Curry could have been had for smething equivalent to this version of Flynn plus something else.
And, of course, scenario 3 requires Flynn to be better than his biggest supporters think he can be. I mean seriously, how many PGs are suddenly better in the NBA than they were in college?
 Look I am thrilled with Rubio and even Ellington at that spot, but giving away Lawson and Calathes and drafting Flynn is terrible. We had 6 picks and we complelety fucked up 3 of them – the third being Henk.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree on Henk

He will never play a minute in the NBA… his numbers are Madsen like in Europe. His highlights when they drafted him, I dont know if anyone else noticed, were him being spoonfed 3 dunks. How great! We should have without a doubt taken Curry. Then worst case scenario we trade both of them to NY for 5-10 years worth of first rounders and a player or two now… Sad thing is NY would have paid up for those two. We coulda at least had Flynn and Chandler for Curry…AT LEAST! Kahn man was Kahned by himself. He thought he was so smooth by drafting two PGs because Flynn was the BPA…more like he undercut the first PG picked! TRADE DOWN! We coulda had Rubio and DeRozan or Henderson or one of the Louisville guys…our team coulda come out of this so much better than we did.

by Mplax on Jun 26, 2009 2:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

On a side note

Maybe we were doing the whole"placate Rubio" thing by taking a teammate of his who supposedly excels in the pick and roll (….twice per game).

by Mplax on Jun 26, 2009 2:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Flynn probably has the skills of a starting point

It’s just that Rubio will be at the position. Considering his offensive possibilities (and that he seems to have a bit of a black hole tendency), I don’t think testing Flynn at shooting guard is a terrible idea. Offensively, at least.

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to his Draftexpress scouting reports

Flynn is a very willing passer who usually makes very good decisions. It doesn’t sound like he’s a black hole at all. Although he’s still short.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Henk is one goofy-looking dude.

He, unlike Rubio, definitely did not pass the girlfriend test. Her exact words: “Jesus, that guy’s hideous.” His game looked fairly hideous too, but at least he’s big.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good riddance to Lawson

Trading him for a #1 next year was genius. The LAST thing this team needed was three (3) rookie PG’s. Get over it!

by Dave T on Jun 26, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, it isn't so much that we traded a rookie PG...

..it is that I don’t think we got proper value from 6, 18 and 45. The post above was in reference to scenario 2 in which Flynn becomes a great back-up. I mean the best we could do with the 6, Lawson and Calathes is a teens pick next year (maybe we get lucky and get a starter), Flynn, and a reach-around form Cuban? We couldn’t have left Calathes in Greece and gotten more? We couldn’t trade Rhino, or Big Oily, or whomever with the 6 and 18 to to get a future 1, a useful player, and the 13? I mean the Knicks are turning down the 6, 18 and Rhino or Carney for the 8 and Chandler? Aren’t we better off? Or whatever. I cannot be satisfied with what we got at 6 and what we did with 18 and 45, especially after Rubio.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, you are seriously determined to be unhappy about this. Your team just drafted Ricky Rubio and only had to give up Mike Miller and Foye. Did you forget what it was like for the how many years under McHale?

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember..

..Miller and Foye for Rubio is a slam dunk. Grinning ear to ear. But what does that have to do with Flynn, Lawson and Calathes? Do you think we got maximum value from those three assets? Kahn said they were trading 18 and Denver told him to pick Lawson, so if that was the best offer, well okay. But unless Flynn is much better than I think and Calathes much worse it doesn’t feel like we got proper value. That is all I am saying. Just because we lucked into Rubio doesn’t mean we should expect less from our other assets.

by CaliWolf on Jun 26, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They had 8 offers for #18...

And went with the best one. I get the idea that Lawson might be a steal, but 17 other teams had enough questions about him to pass him up in a weak draft. Meanwhile, the Wolves got a pick that could be in the lottery in a draft considered to be much deeper from a franchise that has never made the playoffs and has Michael Jordan running things. There’s a possibility that they could get someone with that pick that they would’ve taken at 6 this year. The question, then, becomes when would you have taken Lawson in this year’s draft and, considering who could be available next year, when you would’ve taken him then.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hm. The thing to remember is that it’s not all about the short-term. How can you adequately judge value without having any idea what this team will look like down the line and how the assets we received yesterday will be used to reshape this team? I think that we as fans tend to think everything should go 100% our way, and if something different happens we feel slighted. Remember, during the Mchale days we’d be lucky if we even got 1 pick that was in our top 5. This year we landed a guy who was #1 overall for many of us, as well as a guy with a very high ceiling AND we positioned ourselves well in next year’s draft.

Re: Calathes, on that one I’m not sure. Would have been a nice 2nd rounder for sure, but I’m not really that torn up about it.
Given the other moves, this one doesn’t bother me too much.. not enough to linger, at least. YMMV, but all in all I think things are looking pretty good assuming they get can convince Ricky to be happy and get him over here.

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do think...

….they got good value for Lawson. That is top 12 protected on a questionable Charlotte team. I don’t like the Calathes deal at all.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

im hopeing that the Calthes trade doesnt go through and he stays here

i think he is more of a SG than a PG

Ricky Rubio has become my new man crush

by RaysOfHope on Jun 26, 2009 1:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Might as well start...

Premature trade ideas. Some ideas for Flynn since I’m hoping we kept Rubio.

Teams potentially looking for a PG.

Portland: definitely need a PG (may be looking at Hinrich). What about Flynn for either Rudy Fernandez and/or one of their SFs (Batum, Webster, Outlaw). I love the idea of Fernandez and Rubio for the next decade.

Sac: they were very high on Flynn. Can we offer Flynn and Brewer (they could use wing defender) for Evans? Not that Evans is an ideal shooter for a SG, but I think he and Rubio could work in backcourt together.

Miami: Flynn and Gomes or Brewer for Beasley? Probably a reach, but I always thought Beasley had enough range to play SF.

Indiana: wow…I didn’t realize how bad Indiana is. Besides Danny Granger, there isn’t anyone, including recently drafted Hansbrough, that I’d want.

Toronto: talked about a better looking for better penetrator than Calderon, but again not much there realistically. Bosh and Bargnani not to be had.

Knicks: They’ll probably lose Nate Robinson and Flynn fits that mold although better attitude. Would you trade Flynn (sixth pick in weak draft) for Gallinari (8th pick in stronger draft)? I’m not sure I would.

Looking through list of potential suitors makes our situation a lot scarier. Not a lot of teams looking for PGs after a dozen of them just got drafted.

If I’m Kahn, I think I’m on the phone in the morning with Pritchard figuring out way to get Rudy Fernandez for Flynn.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 26, 2009 2:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And Marc from Mem?

Maybe Pau from the Lakers and Navarro from Memphis as well? We could sure use a Spanish SG…

by Mplax on Jun 26, 2009 2:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A 3 way trade...

…between Memphis, New York, and Minny makes a lot of sense. Blazers aren’t going to trade for Flynn. They got Mills last night and they still could move on Hinrich.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something with....

….Lee to Memphis, Flynn to New York, and Gasol to Minny.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

!!!

This is brilliant. For all parties, seemingly.

by callmeishmael on Jun 26, 2009 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Blazers seem to lack a basic insight

Under Pritchard they surely do love young talent. They seem not to know when to consolidate it, however.

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still think that something could be cooking...

with Phoenix. Nash isn’t going to stay there – they need a point guard. Gentry will keep the 7sol offence intact, so they will need a PG who will push the ball and force the action. If they complete the trade with Golden State, my hope is that we can aquire Wright + one (some) of their expiring contracts for Flynn + one (some) of our expiring contracts. The Suns get an up-tempo PG and we get a young SF with potential. Just have to wait til July 1.

by SoDakHmr on Jun 26, 2009 3:16 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

hadn't thought of that...

I just watched Kahn press conference and I don’t think they’ll be trading Rubio unless some amazing offer comes along. Kahn just seems enamored with him. It also sounds like Rubio may go back to Spain for a year and Flynn/Telfair will be our PGs for this year. I can live with that scenario.

Also, the biggest beneficiary of tonight’s draft in MN is Corey Brewer. Hopefully, he’s been able to work on his jumper and handle b/c right now he may be our start SG…although I have a good feeling about Ellington.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 26, 2009 3:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kahn loves Rubio

and for good reason. Don’t trade Rubio! He can be the Wolves Adrian Peterson, man, get people excited again.

I think Rubio and Love should form some of Color Me Badd-esque R+B vocal group.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cruel Joke...

projected #1 pick in 2010 Draft? Another PG, John Wall…google his youtube video…sick.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 26, 2009 3:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

John Wall!

That guy looks like an absolute beast.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rubio needs....

to be playing for us next year. He is a sport marketer’s dream— boyish, great accent (not Eastern European guttural), floppy hair, remarkable vison and passing (standing O type stff)—will sell boat loads of tickets for Taylor.

They did seemingly make a mistake by not taking Curry and totally electrifying the fan base.

Don’t buy Kahn’s thinking about playing RR and JF together. Rubio needs the ball in his hands to be effective. Flynn needs the ball to take advantage of his greatest attribute, innate court leadership.

I would have wanted to be a mouse in the corner at Telfair’s crib when Lawson was announced at 18. . ST probably was still sitting on the crapper with indigestion from the 6th pick. Hurled when Lawson chosen. He still has to be scratching his…..head.

by Elastico on Jun 26, 2009 6:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How about MEM as a trading partner for Flynn? They can’t really be sold on Mike Conley. Rudy Gay?

We’ve got to play uptempo now with Rubio…Al Jefferson is officially on the block. Maybe they wait a while to let him show he’s healthy, but he’s now the sore thumb on a roster that is otherwise built to run. We could fill some major holes if we find the right trading partner.

by DougW on Jun 26, 2009 6:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rudy Gay would really benefit from Rubio.

We need more athletes. Guys who can FINISH off the opportunities our multitude of PGs (but especially Rick) will be serving up.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We're officially starting over

The “Wolves 89” basketball in Rubio’s hands proves it. Turn back the clock, people!

by feral on Jun 26, 2009 6:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What did the 89 mean?

Maybe I’m an idiot, but that meant nothing to me. Shouldn’t it have been a ‘6’ for Rubio? Or ‘1’ for 1st round pick?

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't 1989 the first year of the Wolves franchise?

They are doing a fair amount of “20th anniversary” marketing this year, I’ve noticed.

by Jackdaw on Jun 26, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every ball has the franchise’s year of inception on it.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, forgot to add that every team had that type of ball.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Starting over is great. Better than pretending you are on the cusp with a low talent roster like we’ve been doing the last two years.

by DougW on Jun 26, 2009 7:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Too true.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 7:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uneasy...

The Flynn pick isn’t really sitting well, after a night’s sleep. I’m afraid that it means we’ll trade Rubio. Are there any notable off-guards who have base year compensation status until July 1? Monta Ellis is the only that comes to mind, but they drafted Curry, so I doubt we took Flynn or Rubio for them. I wonder if Kahn has a handshake on a deal for a two guard with a BYC status until July.

by Andy G on Jun 26, 2009 7:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really don't think..

…they’re getting rid of Rubio. If anyone goes, I think it’s Flynn. Also, they need a small forward and a backup big to go along with shooting guard. They also don’t need to go with just a BYC trade. I agree that it doesn’t make a lot of sense to take the guy in the face of Curry (and DeRozan) but it’s not necessarily a bad thing. If there is a big problem (and we’ll talk about this in the 2nd problem post after the Curry one) it is that Flynn screwed them with bargaining with Rubio. Any deal that a team tries with the Wolves for Flynn will have to deal with the Rubio question. That’s going to drive Flynn’s value downward. This is one area where Kahn was too clever by half. Curry or DeRozan were the right picks for that particular situation, and not just because of fit, but because they were both better players than Flynn.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't even mind if we keep Flynn...

I think a dual-point guard attack would open things up in the transition game, and probably lead to some entertaining basketball. I’m not saying I prefer it, or support the draft choice, but my bigger fear, by far, is that we’ll end up trading Rubio, who could be a once-in-a-generation type of talent. If that really just fell in our laps, I think it was probably not wise to jeopardize the fit and the comfort level of Rubio by taking another point guard. If we weren’t enamored with anyone at 6, we should’ve shopped it as aggressively as possible and just traded down for a cheaper draft pick or player.

In the coming days and weeks, we should find out what is actually going on. First off, we’ll hear whether or not Rubio can/will buy out of his Euro deal. I REALLY think that he is going to. He might not be thrilled about being drafted fifth by Minnesota, but he should be smart enough to realize that the alternatives ahead of us weren’t exactly New York or LA (unless you think the Clips might have actually taken him). He entered the draft, pissed off his Euro team, and there’s no going back. The second thing, is whether he’ll be willing to play for us, given our lack of major market, and new sidekick point guard. That’s where drafting Flynn was risky and probably stupid. I hope it doesn’t come back to bite us. We shall see.

by Andy G on Jun 26, 2009 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope so too..

…I just heard Kahn’s interview on Mike and Mike this morning and it really sounds like he’s intent on playing them together. We’ll see indeed.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it could work on offense

Flynn’s a hell of a slasher and Rubio’s great at setting up his teammates. And the thought of Rubio and Love pick and pop actually makes me drool a little.

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simmons...

I don’t always agree with Bill Simmons on basketball opinions, but I have to admit that his constant raving about Rubio gets me a little excited—if this guy is the passing wizard that he’s made out to be, we’re going to be a fun team to watch.

Jefferson might have to refine his game a little bit, and sacrifice a few iso sets for the sake of getting some easy baskets (for the first time in his career.)

by Andy G on Jun 26, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

…check this out:

http://www.hoopsanalyst.com/0809ew7.htm

and this:

http://www.basketballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=270

I’ve used Jason Kidd as a subjective comparison, as well as Rajon Rondo, but young GP actually works pretty well. Three of McMillan’s seasons actually show up in the top 10. Here’s the thing: Payton was 22 at the time, McMillan anywhere from 22 through 25. Rubio’s translated numbers are similar before the age of 18. If you believe in the importance of age in a prospect’s development–and I firmly do–the argument that Rubio has more upside than anyone in this draft is a reasonable one. He figures to become an elite passer, one of the league’s great ballhawks (his translated steal rate would rank him third in the league behind Chris Paul and Knight) and a terrific rebounder for a point guard. If he develops any semblance of a scoring threat, Rubio will be a perennial All-Star. If I had the No. 1 pick, I would seriously consider Rubio, and I would take him over anyone in the draft besides Griffin.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What are your thoughts

on swapping Love back to Memphis for the Water Buffalo?

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No...

That’s not equal value. In any way, shape, or form. If they’re going to get a Spanish player, it’d be better to find someone who won’t cost them their 2nd-best player. Not to mention that Gasol’s value has decreased because they drafted Thabeet. A team can play Love and Jefferson together but not Gasol and Thabeet.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they can figure out a way...

….to get the Water Buffalo and Gay with Love and Flynn going out…well, I’d have to think about it but Love for the Water Buffalo straight up would be problematic. Rubio, Ellington, Gay, Jefferson, and Gasol wouldn’t be a bad thing. That being said, Love and Bassy are my two favorite players on the squad and I don’t know if I could overcome my geek and homer attachments to Love’s game.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder what the coach will think about this?

Or is that the key to the interview now: “How do you feel about Rubio and Flynn together? You love it? You’re hired!”

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Especially when

they could have taken Curry/DeRozan at 6, and then Lawson/Maynor/Holiday down the draft.

If you’re still not concerned, remember the last time this happened with a foreign player not happy with a drafting him was The Chairman—Yi Jianlan. Milwaukee picked him, he complained about being in Milwaukee, the Bucks kept him for a year, and eventually shipped him with Bobby Simmons for Richard Jefferson, almost one year ago to the date. Now Jefferson has been shipped to San Antonio for . . . nothing.

Yi’s agent? Dan Fegan—the same man who represents Rubio.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's an awful comparison

Yi was a 23 year old who was pretending to be 19, and had no one knew anything about him except he looked good off the bench in two or three international games and could really post-up a chair. That’s as much the reason the Bucks dumped Yi as anything.

And I think Fegan counts in the Wolves favor. Apparently he and Khan are friends.

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're calling it "an awful comparison"

by stating that Yi isn’t as well-known as Rubio, or that the Bucks dumped him because he wasn’t as good as advertised, without noting any reason that Yi’s dissatisfaction with Milwaukee would be different from Rubio’s dissatisfaction with Minnesota.

And Fegan’s alleged friendship with Kahn gives the Wolves leverage in negotiations with Rubio, then Fegan should be barred from being a professional agent. I don’t care if Fegan and Kahn are secret lovers in Argentina—Fegan’s duty is to represent his client’s interests to hell and back.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Extra points..

….for the Sanford reference ;) Maybe Fegan and Kahn simply like to hike the Appalachian Trail.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As of yet I haven't heard Rubio complain about the situation

And it’s important, very important to remember that the Bucks not liking Yi had at least as much to do with the trade as Yi stomping his feet and demanding a trade.

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True on the dissatisfaction on the part of the Bucks

but Yi didn’t have the “oh, well, I guess I’ll stay in Europe for another year or two” option. Rubio was picked about 12 hours ago, so the fallout of this still to come. But this seems to be an auspicious beginning to the relationship:

But the 18-year-old Spaniard was not playing that game. “Are you excited to go to Minnesota?” he was asked.

It was a fair question. It’s a team with quality big men, and a mandate for change. What more could a young point guard want? “I’m excited,” he responded, “to come to the NBA.”

He said his mother hated cold weather.

He was asked about whether being picked by the T-Wolves might inspire him to stay in Europe. He said: “I don’t know yet. I have to think about that … I’m going to talk to my agent about that and we’re going to see.”

He also said he was very surprised that the team had drafted another point guard in Jonny Flynn. He evaded a question about whether or not he’d even come to the NBA — until the very end of the meeting with reporters when he threw in a line saying “I want to play basketball, and if they give me minutes, I’m going to come.”

Just minutes later, his father was quoted in the Spanish newspaper Marca saying it was probable Rubio would not come to the NBA this year. Translated, he said: “He might go now or he might remain [in Europe] one more year … or even two. It’s all open, although the most likely scenario is that he stays in Europe more time. We have to talk with the folks in Minnesota… and see what happens, because, at this point, we can go to Minnesota or otherwise.”

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think there may be..

…something lost in translation here. I think it’s a money-based decision. This kid has a ledger on coming over and I think they need to meet a bottom line. Hopefully a shoe company can help out on this front. We need a certain Portland-based company to come through big-time in a bad economy.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW:

Between Love, Rubio, and Flynn, the Wolves have 3 fantastically marketable players. I don’t typically delve into this thing on the site but all 3 are fantastic public faces for the franchise. Far more so than Big Al.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not exactly..

…the most charismatic guy. Plus, I think his voice scares small children. Flynn is exciting and you can tell he loves the situation he is in and he’s going to be very good at telling people about it. Love is a goof ball and Rubio is a Jonas Brother.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the key.

Rubio needs a Nike deal. They should give it to him, too. Look at him! That’s a face (and game) that’ll sell shoes.

by princelyfrank on Jun 26, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Lawson thing..

…is the kicker. The second they took Rubio I was thinking Curry/DeRozan and Daye/Casspi. With the way things went, I would have loved a Rubio, DeRozan, Casspi draft. That would have been nuts. That being said, they did draft the bpa on their list at every step of the way and hopefully we will see value on or off the court.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

A draft like that requires perfect knowledge of what people behind you are doing to do. I think if Khan knew how things were going to shake out, we would have kept Lawson and drafted DeRozan or Curry at the 6.

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's fair

24 win teams take their top guy and that’s ultimately the argument they can fall back on with little complaint from me other than that I think Curry and DeRozan were clearly better.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worst case scenario

Is that the two guys play in the backcourt together, and one of them gets shipped off in a year or two for something at a different position down the road. I can live with that. Best case is that they complement each other really well and the Wolves turn into Phoenix North (or Golden State East).

by McCleak on Jun 26, 2009 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This shows the weakness of the bpa strategy

I mean, really, who knows who the bpa is? At some point you have to do what’s right for the team, especially considering your earlier picks.

Would we pick three centers if they were all the bpa? The bpa depends so much on intangibles, that there is no way to know who is the bpa. One intangible is motor and motivation. If your pick hurts the motivation… well, you know what I mean.

I have to say I am disappointed with pick 6. My guess is that Kahn thought he could flip Flynn to someone else, maybe he had a handshake. And then the other party backed out for some reason. Welcome to the league…

by timmuggs on Jun 26, 2009 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty subjective

I’ll give you that. But I think it’s far less risky than picking for need. That’s where you see teams make huge reaches. With Rob “Rafael Araujo” Babcock still in the front office and with the Wolves’ past draft history, I’m glad they changed the process to go with bpa over positional fit….even though I disagree with the player. For all of us clamoring for Curry, he’s still likely a point in the NBA if he’s going to be really effective and that still is a bit repetitive with Rubio. DeRozan is the only clear break in position and even I don’t think he was the BPA with Curry on the board.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only good players in this draft were PF’s and PG’s. The BPA strategy gets you one or the other. Next year’s draft has a lot more diversity, which is why the Wolves traded out.

by Dave T on Jun 26, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ricky

I’m a spaniard and this is my take on the draft and ricky rubio. All the interviews that both him and his family have given to spanish media seem to indicate that he will be back for one or maybe even the two remaining years of his contract. The topic about the city being too cold is just a smokescreen, what they don’t like is the fact that minnesota is not a big market so he won’t make as much money for a sponsor(s) in order to solve his buyout problems (and being selected fifth in the rookie salary scale doesn’t help at all).
i also think that getting flynn makes the decission easier, i mean all he said before the draft was that he wanted playing time and that he would even play for free if he felt he was needed in the team (playing for free means that he would use his whole rookie contract to pay his buyout if it was not reduced by a spanish court of law).
Kahn’s thinking has to go in the direction of being afraid about rubio not coming next year, the problem is that now we will never know if rubio stays because he doesn’t like minnesota period or just because they drafted flynn.
If there is a trade i’m pretty certain it will be rubio and not flynn the one going for several reasons:
- rubio can say tomorrow or in a week that he is staying which would put kahn in a tough situation
-rubio’s value is way higher and still can fetch an interesting sign and trade when the free agents market is open.
-rubio will be the starting pg for spain in the european championship with the absence of calderon, if spain wins it would probably mean that rubio has played great and that would be embarrasing for many teams that let him go (specially if their prospects suck at summer league)

by Ricky Rubio on Jun 26, 2009 7:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Is MN not a bigger media market than Sacramento? I don’t get this. Can someone find the numbers?

by Xand1 on Jun 26, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing but positives here...really...

I agree, Rubio is probably the more likely trade candidate, but we are going to get tremendous value for him if that happens. Flynn was likely the next best true PG in the draft, and he too could generate some good offers.

There are several teams that would love either of these guys. Great offers will come. We will get a very good player for one of these guys, and the other will likely be a very good starting pg for us for a long time.

We have flexibility and we have two great assets. Sit back, relax and remember…we were not going to be a contender this season regardless. Would you rather suck with lower quality pieces that “fit” together or suck with high value assets that can be leveraged down the road?

by DougW on Jun 26, 2009 7:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the point...

Is that most of us feel Flynn is the “lower quality piece” at #6 compared to Curry, and is also a far worse fit than Curry would have been.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 26, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Realize that...

but, curry is going to have to disprove all the knocks on him…defensive and athletic ability, not a true PG to justify his current value. Flynn seems more likely to hold his value, given the fact that he is a true point with unquestioned athleticism.

Either way, we’d be looking at a short backcourt. My guess is the Wolves thought that a Flynn/Rubio backcourt was preferable to Rubio/Curry AND that Flynn is a more valuable trading chip. And, I think that may be the correct call.

by DougW on Jun 26, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree with Flynn being the right call.

With Curry, we would have had a PG or a SG.

Curry would be the plan B if Rubio did not come over. Or he would be a strong shooter to pair with Rubio. And Curry would not be the threat to Rubio’s coming over that Flynn represents.

I think Kahn outsmarted himself.

by timmuggs on Jun 26, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is Curry any better at defending the opposing 2 guard? If not, I don’t think it’s cut and dry that he is the better fit next to Rubio.

by Ebomb on Jun 26, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How exactly would Curry not be a threat to Rubio coming over?

Curry is a ball-dominant guard. He’s a media darling so would definitely via with Ricky for endorsements and media attention in the market. Curry can’t guard the 2. Rubio and Curry mix better on offense but probably worse on defense. Curry would have been the value pick primarily if the wolves had wanted to move him the the Knicks for something and the 8 and taking DeRozan.

I’m not sure that the wolves keep Flynn, but he has a lot of potential. Ricky’s vision, passing, and defense, with an athletic, driving guard could be a very exciting combo.

by Krotz the Wall on Jun 26, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think....

…one thing in Flynn’s favor is that one of the reasons why Curry is expected to be effective at the next level is the assumption that he can play point. He’ll be good off the ball, but the big hope was that he could be a ball-dominant on-the-ball guard. Will he be as effective in a Rip Hamilton style role? I don’t think he will. I think he will still be very good (and better than Flynn) but I have been hoping for the guy because he could be on the ball for a large amount of time because that’s what his college game was based on and that’s how he was very effective. Flynn had a much lower usage rate and he played with 2 other guards who got a lot of burn. There might be something to say about that. Curry’s high worth, at least in my estimation, was based on the idea that you’d play him on the ball…a lot. I think that Kahn outsmarted himself in that even if you want to move one of these guys, Rubio likely drives Flynn’s value down until they both hit the court and we see how they play…which could be very good or very bad. Don’t forget that we know nothing about how Rubio’s game will translate. They definitely swung for the fences.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last night, I was sure they would trade Rubio

And I was extremely frustrated. But I’ve decided they probably won’t, and here’s why:

For whatever his strengths and weaknesses, it’s at least clear that Kahn understands the need to market the team and increase the fan base. All of his public comments have indicated that. He must know that Rubio is the best thing that could have happened to him on that front. No way does he blow that by trading him.

I think he’ll come, but it sure doesn’t help recruit him that they took Flynn, which remains entirely inexplicable no matter how you try.

I hope ferverntly that they deal Flynn soon, but it doesn’t seem likely. The Knicks need a guy who can get up and down the floor, but it’s not clear they have any interest in Flynn. If I could trade Flynn+ for Galinari I’d do it without thinking twice. I’m sure the Knicks wouldn’t, though.

Sadly, I only caught the very end of Kahn on the radio this morning, so I didn’t hear him justify himself. I did hear the end of an answer where he seemed to be saying that Curry was a great shooter but that he thought there would be more defensive problems with Rubio/Curry than Rubio/Flynn.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 26, 2009 8:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Fully agree...

… with the marketing savvy on Kahn’s part. He knows better than to blow this and shift the entire energized fan base into full-blown “Ohhhhh my god, I knewwwww it was too good to be true!!!” mode. I really like the idea of picking up Wright in the event of a PHO blowup. I was also wondering about Barbosa…

by TheH on Jun 26, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m a Knicks fan, but I’ll tell you, I prefer Jonny over Rubio. I’m not a huge fan of Rubio. Both will probably be very good, but I’ve seen Flynn play at Syracuse, and he’s a special player.

That said, the rumored deal I heard was Nate Robinson and Jordan Hill(plus maybe cash considerations) for one of the two PG…..they said Rubio was more likely, but Flynn could conceivably be moved.

The Knicks seemed to like Flynn when he worked out for them, but no word yet on if any deal will happen.

by ljshorty89 on Jun 26, 2009 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't see that trade happening...

Jordan Hill is the absolute last player the Wolves need.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 26, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

More to the point

what on earth is the use of Nate Robinson when they have Jonny Flynn? Talk about redundant. How many midgets does one NBA team need? Those guys would be fantastic in the under 6 foot league at the local rec center, though.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 26, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What would you be looking for to trade Flynn then? David Lee? I mean, I have no idea what the Wolves want, I’m just telling you what SLAM Magazine is saying.

“Lang Whitaker of SLAM Magazine is reporting a rumor that would send Jordan Hill and Nate Robinson to Minnesota in exchange for Rubio.”
-From Theknicksblog.com

by ljshorty89 on Jun 26, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No lee..

….they already have enough power forwards. Also, I can guarantee that deal won’t happen. Jonny Flynn and Robinson don’t make sense together. Hill is also a 4. It will never happen. Unless a 3rd team is involved or NY give up 2-3 unprotected 1st rounders, there isn’t anything on the Knicks the Wolves really need in exchange for Rubio.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but Rubio going to Spain and never playing a minute for the Wolves is better for the team?

by ljshorty89 on Jun 26, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

HIs Buyout

is $0 in 2011. I suppose it’s possible he could turn down a 4 year guaranteed contract to play in the league that he’s always dreamed about, but I guess you think he’s willing to stay in Spain forever, never earn the money of an NBA max contract, and never test abilities against the best in basketball, all because the media has created this notion that he wants to be a Knick. Ridiculous.

by Ebomb on Jun 26, 2009 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Lang Whitaker of SLAM Magazine"

Sounds like a made-up soap opera character. And if he’s not made up, that rumor sure is…

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Jun 26, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right. Lang Whitaker, the executive editor of SLAM Magazine, and a guy who wrote a weekly column for SI clearly knows nothing about sports.

by ljshorty89 on Jun 26, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes....

…and that’s still a ridiculous rumor.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

anyone esle TERRIFIED @

Flynn over Curry being Roy – Foye 2.0?!?! i am very, veyr, very concerned mayn!

MAYN HOL UP!

by MAYNHOLUP on Jun 26, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don’t be. Flynn is a much better defender than the 2-3 Zone showed him to be last year. He’s an energizing, smart, exciting player, and he is the kind of guy that will be an EXCELLENT team leader. That’s why I’m hoping you guys trade him to my Knicks….even though it’ll never happen.

by ljshorty89 on Jun 26, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would be...

…if he landed in a place other than GSW and was allowed to play the point. Curry needs the ball a lot to be effective. With Ellis and probably Stoudemire, I just don’t know if he’ll be able to put up the numbers that would make him a Foye/Roy threat. As much as I like Curry, if you are going to play him off the ball, you’re not getting the full product. He’ll still be very good but he’ll be more Rip Hamilton than Chauncey Billups…if that makes sense.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few thoughts this morning

Everybody seems to be bummed we didn’t take Curry, I’m starting to warm up to the fact we didn’t. I know combine numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, but here is Flynn vs. Curry.

Standing Reach:
Flynn – 7’11.5"
Curry – 8’1"

No Step Vert Reach
Flynn – 10’8.5""
Curry – 10’6.5"

Max Vertical Reach
Flynn – 11’3.5""
Curry – 11’0.5"

Flynn also dominated Curry on the speed and agility drills. If you can get over the board’s love for Curry, it’s possible that Flynn can player taller than Curry. The reports of him standing flat footed under the hoop and dunking point to his athleticism. If we look at what skills they bring, Curry is an amazing shooter, but Flynn does excel at some things

From DX

Flynn was a standout in two areas: his ability to get to the rim, and his one-on-one skills. Thankfully for him, those are two skills that the NBA values dearly. Clearly, his productivity is grounded in his first step. Flynn got to the rim 8.8 times per game, which accounted for a lot of his scoring, but his 1.24 PPP in unguarded catch and shoot situations and .94 PPP on pull up jumpers are both very respectable. His 4.3 possessions per game on isolations are amongst the best amongst big-conference players, and his 41% shooting on those plays isn’t awful. Couple those tools with his capacity to drive in both directions and his ability to draw fouls (16.1% SF), and it becomes hard not to think that Flynn could be, at the very least, a high quality backup if he improves his efficiency, especially once he masters the pick and roll (.84 PPP).

Flynn is great in isolations, getting to the basket, one-on-one situations. He is strong at Curry’s perceived weakness, getting to the rack. This team could definitely use a player like this, especially if Rubio is more focused on running the fast break, getting out on the open floor, and doing the pick and roll. In actuality, although they are both point guards, they both have different skills.

If we ignore Telfair for a second, and realize we have 48 minutes for the point, if Rubio and Flynn share those minutes that’s 24 for each all ready. Clearly going up against the Lakers or Blazers starting lineups, having Rubio guard Kobe or BRoy is not a favorable matchup. But Rubio-Flynn can guard some backcourts together, Kidd-Terry, Lowry-Brooks, and others. This allows the Wolves to play matchups, with just Rubio and his limited athleticism, we have major problems with the small quick PG’s that have become en vogue. Flynn by all accounts is small and quick and maybe the most ahtletic small and quick guy in the league. This gives us flexibility.

Flynn and Rubio don’t need to start the game together and play 25 minutes together, but depending on matchups, if both can get 10 minutes of burn together a night, and defending them would a nightmare, their should be 30 minutes a piece for each, and it could be very effective for the Wolves.

by Ebomb on Jun 26, 2009 9:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Great points.

And it just dawned on me yesterday, but as much as I love Curry, you could look at his stats during his last college season, and see some similarities to Randy Foye’s last year at Villanova. The numbers were a lower for Foye, but obviously against much better competition all season long.

Now, I think Curry will be a better pro than Randy Foye—and I like Randy Foye as a third banana. But for a team that basically just dumped a 2-guard-in-a-point-guard’s-body to the Wizards, it’s not surprising that they didn’t value Curry as high as others might have.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Jun 26, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good catch Ebomb

Here’s hoping he can maintain his catch and shoot numbers as well as his ability to get to the rim and draw fouls.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Help

Can the merchants of the Twin Cities please get together and offer Rubio several million dollars to endorse their whatever? Also, can the Vikings hire Rubio as a consultant and give him a cool $2 million? C’mon Glen, get creative, you’ve done it before, just don’t get caught this time. Can Rubio “work” on the weekends making wedding invitations for a cool $1 million?

It’s too bad we’re in a recession. Get Nike on the phone. There has to be a way to get this kid some money to bring him over here. Sure MN is a small market but c’mon!

by littleboxes on Jun 26, 2009 9:20 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here, here

Market the hell out of this kid.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto

+1, Minnesota as a whole has more to offer Rubio toward his buyout than just $500,000. Also, there are more spanish/hispanic fans in MN than most realize

by alwaystherealdeal2002 on Jun 26, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have Mr. Stern pull some strings too

It’s obviously in the interest not just of the Timberwolves, but the entire league, to have an exciting, marketable player like Rubio in the NBA. Do you think the league office has some under-the-table slush fund that David Stern can dip into and give Ricky a shoebox full of cash?

by Jackdaw on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

flynn

Don’t get me wrong, flynn is my second favourite player in this draft (griffin is the best player, i just don’t get hyped by him as an nba player), he can shoot, pass, is quick and athletic enough to finish in traffic. What i criticise is the poor psynergy level between him and ricky, neither is great without the ball on offense, neither is a catch and shoot type of guy, neither can come off screens the way a sg like stephon curry can…
and defensively i can’t see it either. Ricky is a great defender, he won defensive player of the year while missing half the season with a wrist injury, he lead the league in steals two years in a row and he got like 3 against cp3 and company in the olympics final, but the problem is that those things only work against a pg against whom he has the lengh and size advantage, and the factflynn can’t never guard a shooting guard in the nba is something everyone can agree upon, even david kahn, or at least i hope so.
They can play 20 minutes each and share like 5-6 together, but still not the best situation for two developing young players that have to learn a system and be consisten in it.
I can’t see to date a team giving enough for flynn, and i can’t see then risking losing flynn in a trade and ricky staying in spain because he reached a verbal agreement with joventut before that trade happens.

by Ricky Rubio on Jun 26, 2009 9:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

confidence

Let’s talk about Kahn’s “intangibles” then.

I think what’s freaking me out most isn’t the picks themselves per se (although they are glaringly suspicious in some cases) as much as a desire for a culture of stability and confidence; a sense that Kahn knows what he’s doing. Instead the whole night felt like he was making it up as he was going along. I’m not a huge Simmons fan, but he posted one email that summed it up perfectly—that it felt like Kahn had a fantasy draft computer program that was accidentally left on to take BPA no matter what.

I’ve listened to back to back interviews with Kahn on Dan Patrick now, and it’s clear to me he thinks he’s way smarter than he is; that is to say, he doesn’t recognize his blind spots. The results ultimately might be different, who knows, but the perception of draft day was McHale II: Wrath of Kahn.

by Rasho Revolution on Jun 26, 2009 10:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think a 24 win team..

…with 6 picks has to take the BPA no matter what. I would have taken Griffin with the #1 pick even with Al and Love. This was a PG heavy draft and they just happened to have 3 picks where the BPA was at that spot…4 if you throw in Calathes.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well....

Sure, I’d have taken Griffin too. That’s a totally strained analogy, though, which you know. Griffin is the uber-stud in this draft, neither Flynn nor Curry was ever going to be that.

SnP, I appreciate you bearing up, but…wasn’t it just two days ago that you posted the statement that “Curry will be the 2nd best player in this draft?” What happened to you?

by Eric in Madison on Jun 26, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not straying from that

I think they should have taken Curry. I also thought they’d take him and someone like Harden or Derozan and he would be allowed to be on the ball for a ton of time. You draft Curry because you want a ball-dominant guard with a high usage rate. Here’s the paragraph where I said he was 2nd best:

Stephen Curry is the 2nd best player in this draft. This one got some steam when Blake Griffin told the world that he believes Curry is Numero Dos next to his Top Dog, but we have rated Curry as the 2nd best player for a long time. Curry is going to be an amazing ball-dominant scoring point guard in the NBA. He will not be faced with the double and triple teams he saw at Davidson and the NBA’s perimeter defensive rules will allow his hesitation-based pick and roll game to become an influential player—-operating as a sort of inverted Tony Parker by making a living off of mid-range pick and roll jumpers and threes (as opposed to Parkers mid-range pick and roll jumpers and layups). If Curry is on the board at #6, you take him and don’t let go.

Tony Parker wouldn’t be Tony Parker next to Ricky Rubio. Rubio changed everything if you are going to build around the kid. that’s why I wrote this in my final draft board:

DeRozan was able to score at USC without even the threat of three point proficiency. He made up for his lack of outside shooting by racking up a 56% mark from 2 with 49% in isolation, 43% in catch-and-shoot, and 41% on pull up jumpers. Throw in an above average OReb% for his position as well as a modest ability to get to the line and you have a player with upper-level athleticism and a….boring middle range workman-like game. Think Ryan Gomes with hops and a higher upside rather than Gerald Green or Vince Carter. DeRozan is the type of player who will need a good point guard at the next level. Until he can develop his dribble-drive game, he will need to be set up in the 1/2 court. While we all wait for that to happen, he has the tools to be a good defender, excellent rebounder for his position, and a solid mid-range player. If the Wolves make a trade up to the two spot for Rubio, DeRozan is exactly the type of player you want to put with him at the off guard spot. Just remember that he’s more lunch bucket than someone with that type of athleticism would suggest.

All of that being said, I still think you take Curry for the shooting while hoping he can be a mini Rip Hamilton, but with Rubio, you get a watered-down Curry…which is what will happen in Golden State next to Ellis. I still think a watered down Curry is better than Flynn but Curry was the 2nd best player as a point, not a guy who runs off screens and hits catch and shoot jumpers.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

more thoughts

I think I’m thinking more about tone and psychology here…the franchise and fanbase is fragile; you need to create a narrative that things are on the right track. You need to give the fans a sense that the pieces are fitting together and that you’re not trying to jam square pegs into a round hole.

In that sense, Flynn is just…emotionally jarring and bewildering, even if you had identified him on your board as a BPA. You saw it at the response at the draft party. Kahn essentially needs to re-sell the franchise to the community and it was one step forward and 1.5 steps back.

But even more than the pick itself, actually, was the spin after it—start talking about the “reinvention of the backcourt” and the Wolves’ fans b.s. meters go through the roof.

 If you don’t like Curry, take him anyway and trade down (the Knicks, or whoever) and procure maximum value for the 6. Heck, you might have been able to get Flynn anyway at 8, while picking up another piece.

by Rasho Revolution on Jun 26, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very good point..

…about the fan base. It was definitely jarring.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Telfair

What is going through his head at the moment? He can’t be the guy who hopes Rubio doesn’t come over, but he’d also be affected by it significantly. If they can’t play together, he’s the one who loses out. Yet he’s the veteran in all of this who’s going to be partially responsible for helping show them the way while he’s fighting for his own career. Talk about a potentially awkward situation.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 10:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I appreciate Bassy and think he played as well as could be expected last year

but he isn’t the guy you want mentoring 2 young point guards. He’s still young himself, and playing for his place in the league and his next contract. You can’t go to camp with all three of them. At the very least, it’s unfair to Telfair to do that.

What you need is a somewhat better version of Kevin Ollie.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 26, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I’m not going to rule anything out, but that’s probably the next step.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 26, 2009 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

seems like people are settling down...

…which is a relief. cause i think i’m in disagreement with most.

i thought the wolves had a pretty good draft, considering. we got ridiculously lucky and had Rubio fall in our laps, and were still able to pick the guy the FO clearly was most impressed with after our huge PG workout. (i guess it could have been Evans, but his unavailability was key to Ricky being there at 5) Khan picked the guy he liked, a guy who has clear skills, clear weaknesses that can be changed (will he be competing with Brewer to see who’s first to 30,000 jump shots each summer?), and, like Ebomb adroitly pointed out, gave us 48 awesome minutes at the point each night with another 10-15 when they’re on the court together. no Anthony Carter replacing Billups-with the corresponding dearth of offense-in MN.

next year, we’ve got multiple picksto address the 2/3, maybe even the 5, as far as the future, and then we’ve still got a boatload of expirings to make a move for a legit vet/all star to complete the transformation from rebuilding to contending. i don’t think i could bear a repeat of trying to patch gaping holes with MLE signings like the old days. if Khan says it will take 16 months to build a foundation, i’m gonna be patient for at least 12 of ’em.

plus, i’d rather we got that top 10 pick next season, then gave it to the Clips on ‘11 when we make ’em pick in the late 20’s.

hope that made sense.

by johndough on Jun 26, 2009 11:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not sure if anyone has mentioned this, but it is entirely possible that Kahn took Rubio knowing full well that he wouldn’t play here, but his trade value was well beyond anything we could have picked up in the draft.

by DougW on Jun 26, 2009 11:55 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Will the Wolves become a run-and-gun team?

All of the highlights I’ve seen of Rubio are on the fast break. Rubio, Flynn, Carney/Brewer will run all day. The Wolves should hire Paul Westhead for their coaching staff.

by Dave T on Jun 26, 2009 12:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep...

…for links, click on the word you want to link and hit the little button to the left of the tree. Paste in the link and hit ok.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 26, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hope all is well

Now that I’m sufficiently calmed down (I was very pissed last night), I’m pretty happy about the Kings chances.

All that said, I think the Wolves have an interesting draft and I remain very intrigrued by the Rubio/Flynn pairing long term. (OR what arises from this.)

I think Kahn may have a much larger impact than any of us thought. Then again, I’m an idiot too.

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 26, 2009 4:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Glad someone is staying calm

We don’t know what we have here yet. I think your last paragraph says it all.

by Cobra312004 on Jun 27, 2009 1:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Casper's 2010 Big Board and Mock Draft 3-08-2010
No-seagulls_small
Fake Wolves Team Recap from the Future
Small
Defensive player of the year
Twolves_small
A conversation between Kahn and Rambis

Recent FanPosts

Small
a rare optimistic take on the Wolves, courtesy of TrueHoop
Small
The votes are in!
Rickyrubio_small
Two Lists of Players, Free Agents, and Prospects we should look at in filling our two biggest needs, an Athletic, Shot Blocking Big Man, and an Athletic, Scoring, Wing.
Small
The Charlotte Pick (dun dun dun)
Wolveslogo_small
Prowling the NBA: March 7 - How did you get so many Q's?
Small
Darko warming to the Wolves?
Small
Game Recap: Houston please don't laugh at our problem.
Flyingpig_small
2010 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
N1533160639_3437_small
Well, this is really embarrasing but it's the right thing to do

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko

    Misc:

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop