The real reason McHale's future uncertain?
I don't know if many, or any, Hoopus readers ever visit Minnpost.com, but they have a great collection of reporters and columnists over there, including many of the too-expensive castoffs from the Strib and PiPress. One of those is the venerable Steve Aschburner who covered the Wolves for the Strib for a long time before leaving for SI (might be ESPN, can't remember) before returning to MN. Anyways, I've always thought that Steve wrote great stuff and didn't always pander to the team, so I am inclined to believe (moreso than less) what he wrote today regarding McHale's future with the team and the decision to hire Kahn:
"[T]here is another dynamic at work, insiders say, involving the team's power structure."
Insiders will tell you that the decision to stay away has been McHale's choice as much as Kahn's or anyone else's in Wolves management. Kahn acknowledged to me Wednesday afternoon that he and McHale have been "circling" each other — he didn't even quibble with the word — in meeting twice so far, without conclusion, to decide if McHale will be back. After all, what worked for McHale and Taylor when the big guy was VP of basketball ops — a handshake deal, annual ponderings whether he should continue — won't work as an NBA head coach.
Those 30 positions require contracts, at far heftier salaries ($3 million annually and up), with time horizons that make it clear to the players in the locker room that the coach is going to be around beyond this season or this week. Or, at least, management has a financial incentive to keep the coach around beyond this season or this week. That McHale doesn't have that protection from the Wolves — along with the assurance that money coming free under the salary cap will be spent on roster improvements rather than backfilling for the owners' losses — makes it understandable that he wouldn't be committing to the Wolves before they similarly commit to him.
But there is another dynamic at work, insiders say, involving the team's power structure. Rob Moor, one of Taylor's sons-in-law, is the Wolves' heretofore low-profile, low-impact "CEO." He has been taking a more prominent role lately, however, to the point of spearheading the ostensible GM search that led to Kahn's hiring to a loftier title. Moor's power — or at least hands-on activities — has been expanding. And this is in contrast to most previous years, when the basketball side was run by McHale, Saunders and others almost as an independent fiefdom, with a direct line up to Taylor. Moor rarely had any traction internally with that crowd.
There's more reasoning (and prefacing), but that is the gist of Steve's article. I have to admit to not knowing much about Moor at all--or his role with the team. If what Aschburner is suggesting is true, then it might help explain why a '2 week process' turned into a 5+ week one, and why many of the candidates might have turned them down despite Glen Taylor swearing that they would have complete control over the FO and McHale's return. If Moor wanted more power, and Lindsey et al realized that they would either be working for--or have to work through--Moor, then even their supposed full authority over basketball operations would have strings attached.
Aschburner ends by suggesting that McHale get an opportunity to return as HC as well as making an ominous observation:
If McHale doesn't get [the opportunity to return as HC], some fans will delight in the outcome, thanks to past failings in a different role. But it will be a decision made for the wrong reasons, a knack this franchise already has shown way too often.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
I read anticle at Twolves Blog
From a NY paper basically saying the same thing, that Moor is the real one in power, that he only wanted to hire somebody more in touch with the business side of the team, because he aspires to have more of a say in basketball decisions. It is disconcerting, especially because we don’t know much about him, and since he his apparently working from the shadows as a middleman between GT and the FO, he has no accountability. This article does seem to jive with the other I read, and that I guess we shouldn’t be shocked to hear that Moor has a larger say in personnell moves.
by Ebomb on Jun 5, 2009 4:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Could you post a link to the article?
I’d love to read it.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 5, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming you can still find it.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 5, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here you go
Mitch Lawrence NY Daily News Article
It’s not surprising that the Timberwolves hired David Kahn as GM and didn’t bother to call Larry Harris, Bernie Bickerstaff or Billy King, all of whom have run NBA teams and had expressed interest in their GM vacancy.
In filling the league’s last GM opening, the T-Wolves went with Kahn, a non-basketball exec, who will work with Rob Moor, the team’s CEO who also happens to be owner Glen Taylor’s son-in-law.
In what could be a risky move, the T-Wolves are allowing Moor to have a major voice in basketball decisions. That will start with the draft, where the Timberwolves have the No. 6 pick.
Moor wants to have a big influence on the direction of the team, so Harris (who ran Milwaukee), Bickerstaff (Charlotte) and King (Philadelphia) really didn’t have a chance to get a call back. Ex-Miami GM Randy Pfund interviewed for the post, but later took his name out of consideration.
Kahn was involved in the business side of team operations and the building of the Pacers’ Conseco Fieldhouse when he worked under Donnie Walsh in Indiana. So he’s exactly the kind of GM that Moor wants in place.
by Ebomb on Jun 5, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting comment I read on the STrib blog before any of this came out in regards to Moor that I think makes more sense now
You guys don’t get it. Rob Moor, Glen’s son in law ran the search for this new guy. Rob Moor is a total loser who has screwed up this franchise since day 1. David Kahn was only selected because Moor was afraid of losing another candidate. The others left, not because of stipulations, but because they met Moor and didn’t want to work under him. He wouldn’t even call these guys back. Hoiberg, Stack and McHale have worked under these conditions for years and are good guys. Anyone who thinks that firing these guys will HELP the franchise, are nuts.
by Ebomb on Jun 5, 2009 4:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm...
This doesn’t exactly look promising.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 5, 2009 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's the upside...
MN Timberwolves jerseys and memorabilia will become collectibles when the team moves to Seattle or elsewhere.
by timmuggs on Jun 5, 2009 7:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
RUMINT...
…has it that this is what made Dennis Lindsey run away screaming.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 5, 2009 9:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh Oh.
He’s overbearing, underwhelming……
And he’s family.
McHale will stay.
This is going to end in tears. Ours.
by Auswolf on Jun 6, 2009 7:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ladies and Gentlemen...
your Kansas City/Seattle/Cincinnati?/Ft. Wayne?/Syracuse? Timberwolves! (complete with a mix of sadness, sarcasm and contempt – free of charge!)
by SoDakHmr on Jun 7, 2009 3:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think this makes them closer to leaving because, if nothing else, there’s a chance someone else from the team would want to buy the team if Taylor wanted to sell, and the only way I see the team moving is if it’s sold. It’s potentially disconcerting because this is similar to the Harv and Marv Wolves, who had Marv’s son-in-law in charge. It would seriously disturb me if Taylor were willing to let someone with no hoops background make personnel decisions. Other than that, if the main thing that’s keeping him in this job is the fact he’s married to Taylor’s daughter, here’s hoping a divorce comes some day (that sounds worse than it’s meant to be). Steinbrenner’s son-in-law was in line to run the Yankees, but then his wife filed for divorce.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jun 7, 2009 11:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Prior experience
I did check up on Moor’s bio a little bit, and he was with the LA Kings (NHL) from ‘87-’94? as a front office executive. I don’t know if that was more business than personnel, but he wasn’t a back-office schmuck. Incidentally, (and perhaps coincidentally), his arrival there happened at basically the same time they traded for Gretzky and initiated a long run of success for the franchise. I only bring this up to raise two more observations—Moor has worked for a successful FO before, and he’s either been an ancillary part of or was at least there when said successful FO traded for a big name player to jumpstart their success (think Reggie White joining the Packers, even tho that was a FA signing).
So does this mean that Moor thinks he can capture his own lighting/Gretzky in a bottle for the Wolves? Is that why he wants to be the shadow puppet master? I don’t know. There’s always a chance that it works out, and maybe Kahn will be a good for him in that he’ll keep on him about cap implications and not wanting to do anything stupid. On the other hand, maybe we’re in for the Al Davis experience.
The real (Ok, hypothetical at this point) question is, if Moor was to target a big name guy, who would it be? What gettable guy out there has the chance to change this franchise like Gretzky changed the Kings? CP3? Others?
Discuss.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 8, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he can swing a trade and get Gretsky into a Wolves jersey?
If Rob Moor manages to obtain the greatest basketball player off all time onto the team, then he’ll have my loyalty. Unfortunately, I think Jordan’s retired for good this time. Maybe Magic will want to give it one more go? He looked pretty svelte in his skintight jumpsuit in the “Old School” Barkley and D-Wade ad.
by princelyfrank on Jun 8, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe Nash
He’s from Canada, eh?
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jun 8, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












