Trade With OKC Thunder- Timberwolves acquire Wilkins and Atkins.
[Ed. Front-paged since it had the most comments among all three trade threads]
From Timberwolves.com:
The Minnesota Timberwolves announced the team has traded center Etan Thomas and two future second-round draft picks to the Oklahoma City Thunder in exchange for 6-6 guard Damien Wilkins and 5-11 guard Chucky Atkins.
"We're committed towards rebuilding our roster with an eye towards flexibility and long-term success, and this move better positions us for the summer," said David Kahn, Timberwolves President of Basketball Operations. "I want to thank Etan for his professionalism and understanding, and wish him all the best moving forward."
Wilkins joins the Wolves after spending each of his five previous NBA seasons with the Thunder franchise, where he signed as a free agent after going undrafted in the 2004 NBA Draft. In 310 career games, Wilkins has averaged 7.6 points, 2.6 rebounds and 1.5 assists per game.
A 10-year NBA veteran, Atkins went undrafted out of the University of South Florida before signing with Orlando in 1999. In 655 career games with Orlando, Detroit, Boston, L.A. Lakers, Washington, Memphis, Denver and Oklahoma City, Atkins has averaged 10.2 points and 3.5 assists per game. Atkins was named to the NBA All-Rookie Second Team in 1999 and also played on the gold-medal-winning U.S. National Team at the 1995 World University Games.
Thomas, acquired by the Wolves on June 24, has appeared in 373 games over his seven-year career. The 6-9 center owns career averages if 6.0 points and 4.9 rebounds per game. Thomas was originally selected by the Dallas Mavericks with the 12th overall pick in the 2000 NBA Draft.
**************************************************************************************************************************
5-11 Chucky Atkins will probably be our veteran PG somewhat like Kevin Ollie was last year. Atkins has been a very good player in some years, with his best season being for the Lakers in 04-05. He's a good playmaker and he has a decent shot.
Damien Wilkins has time to improve his skills at age 29 although he hasn't shown much improvement over his career. He gives us a third SF, along with Ryan Gomes and Corey Brewer. Damien isn't a great shooter of any kind. Not a good 3pt shooter, 2pt shooter, FT shooter...
Etan Thomas wouldn't do that much for our team, probably somewhat like Jason Collins, so I'm completely fine with this trade. We could have done something with our 2nd round picks, but I think it's fine to give those up.
119 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You beat me to it
Can someone delete my fanpost above?
As for this deal…eh. Not a big deal either way, but I would have rather kept Thomas if any of these guys are going to be on the roster this year.
As you note, maybe Atkins plays the veteran PG role. Wilkins is turning 30 this season; he isn’t getting any better.
I dunno, as I said above, this seems like roster shuffling for the sake of roster shuffling. I understood the Q trade; this one seems…almost aimless. Activity as an illusion of progress. But we’ll see what comes of it.
by Eric in Madison on Jul 27, 2009 2:00 PM CDT reply actions
No worries
I just don’t want mine cluttering up the site. Keep the conversation in one place.
by Eric in Madison on Jul 27, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions
I just went on timberwolves.com hoping to see some Ricky Rubio news, and...
I found out that they made that trade.
I can see why we did this
We just got rid of one of out Big Men, so that helps a little bit, and we got a mentor for all of the PGs we have on this team. As for Wilkins, I don’t see him staying long.
Ah, apparently only $760K
of Atkins’ contract is guaranteed this year, so it actually saves them around $3 million this season. We’ll see if they use that. I assume now that they will waive Atkins.
by Eric in Madison on Jul 27, 2009 2:04 PM CDT reply actions
Or trade him to a team that needs salary relief right now
by Eric in Madison on Jul 27, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Also, Wilkins had a trade kicker of 10%
So I believe that puts his salary at $3,630,000
Contract page updated.
www.canishoopus.com
I agree
either another trade (perhaps involving QRich as Kahn foreshadowed last week), or Atkins will be waived. Either way the end result will be a lower payroll which has been the secret plan all along (while adding cap space and assets for a year from now). This is fine with me since I would also cut payroll as much as possible knowing this is a 20-25 win team this season.
We finally got him...
Damien Wilkins, our big attempted free-agent signing of a few years ago. Proving once again that Kahn excels while McHail fails!
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 27, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions
I didn't even know about that, but:
http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/news/wolves_sign_wilkins_offersheet_050818.html
We signed him to an offer sheet in 05, which the Sonics matched.
It was partly a Casey thing
Our erstwhile coach had played some role in Wilkins’ development, back in the day, hadn’t he?
I would rather have Calathes
If one of those second rounders came from trading him.
by oblivionspocket on Jul 27, 2009 2:28 PM CDT reply actions
Why not trade an Injury Prone 5 for an Lousy Back-Court Production
The only logical explaination is this trade saves money this year since Atkins has very little guaranteed.
I'm glad
that it looks like Atkins contract will be bought out. It would bode poorly for Ricky coming over if Kahn were to travel to Spain, then come back and immediatly aquire a point guard.
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 27, 2009 2:38 PM CDT reply actions
Who is worse/older than Bassy . . .
and just rocketed into a tie for 8th place in the Most Franchises Played For standings (You’re almost at the top, Kevin Ollie—quick,sign a new contract with some other team!)
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
Underwhelming
It’s like being hungry and finding all you have to eat is dry crackers. You eat, your less hungry, but ……….
Even the analogies suck.
Should we be concerned about coughing up 2 second rounders? Not sure that is a great use of resources.
Only cowards pray for rain.
by Auswolf on Jul 27, 2009 2:39 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
We have, or had
four second rounders next year, not to mention as many as 3 first rounders. The trading frenzy of the 2nd round each year teaches us that these picks aren’t really hard to attain if we want them. Also, our history, for better or worse, is to not really value these picks.
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 27, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions
The second rounders are
the reality of salary savings this year. I also agree the Wolves have plenty of draft choices in the near future. You can only stash so many guys in Europe.
Stashing players in Europe
Does count against the Cap. This is why their was so much talk about the Trailblazers renouncing Freedland and Koponnen.
by Jose Cordoba on Jul 27, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, actually, no
You can stash as much as you’d want, and why wouldn’t you. It only increases the chance that one day you get a Luis Scola, Tony Parker or Ginoboli out of it in 4-5 years. Picking for potential is like buying a lottery ticket .. if you can get ’m for free it never hurts your chances.
Especially since nobody can see how our roster will look like in a few years. A position of need could be a position of logjam in that timeframe (cfr PG)
We got Rubio!
by Wim (Belgium) on Jul 28, 2009 2:34 AM CDT up reply actions
One step forward, two back? Or two forward...
I loved the Q trade – packaging 3 contracts for one big expiring contract for the very low cost of a backup PG. But now the Wolves are going in the other direction – one big expiring for two smaller contracts…
I suppose the Chucky low gurantee thing is nice – if it will be used as part of another deal to a team that needs to save money NOW – and not at the trade deadline. If this was attractive because it would save the Wolves money… yuck.
If anything, I’ll give Kahn some credit here and wait for the next move – as he seems to be in the zone for making deals. But if this is it… yuck…
Agree
I don’t get this one. It seems to undo the consolidation of contracts we did with the Q trade. And if ever there was an opening for Garrett Siler, this is it! My goodness we need a big body in the worst way now.
by Rascal Flatts on Jul 27, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Isn't he goinmg to the Hawks camp?
Sometimes the obvious is hidden.
by frankenhoops on Jul 28, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions
yes. AND to the Wolves' camp, maybe Charlotte too
Scott Shroeder posted that news a few days ago as a FanShot:
The source is from a post-Summer League interview:
http://www.wrdw.com/blogs/sports/51605942.html
I got invited to the Hawks veterans camp, so that’ll be either late August or early September. And I also got invited to Minnesota’s veterans camp. That’s basically the camp right before you make the roster so that’s like the last camp. And Charlotte wants to invite me to their mini-term camp so I just have to figure out where I want to be and then from there, it’s just kind of of working out in between then.
Outstanding
Thank you for the information!
Sometimes the obvious is hidden.
by frankenhoops on Jul 29, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
And I imagine Atkins is the Rubio hedge
Or Brown can be waived if Blond Rickys buyout can be sorted.
Only cowards pray for rain.
by Auswolf on Jul 27, 2009 2:42 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
It's hard to look at this one..
…as anything other than a salary dump. They took on an extra contract but they slashed the amount of guaranteed money owed to the players occupying those slots.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I disagree
I think this a cunning plan by Khan to make the young perimeter guys look good. I can guarantee, any time Ellington, Rubio, Brewer, or Flynn are subbed out fo Atkins, Wilkins, or Richardson, every Wolves fan will be screaming in horror.
they definitely...
…should be able to earn a ton of minutes.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
The second rounders
Are the only thing that is somewhat sour for me with this deal. Although, the number of second rounders that have done anything for the Wolves over the life of the franchise you can count on one hand, so there is that—and that’s even including Euro-stashing.
I think Wilkins stays, as he has some value as a perimeter defender. DX’s take on him defensively is that he’s kind of pesky—not a stopper per se but someone who is tough to score on.
If Atkins stays, he’s the de facto PG mentor. That partial guaranteed contract looks devious, though. Perhaps he’ll be bought out so that we can sign a FA? Any FA out there worth signing?
I was a bit hopeful for Thomas, but we had too many bigs and now OKC has their Chandler fill in. (yes, that was a dig).
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
It's funny that...
There are two people who say they will never watch a Wolves game again because of this trade.
Perhaps they were the same two people
who said they’d start watching the Twolves after the Foye/Miller trade.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Geez
Certainly doesn’t take Sid long to become close personal friends with someone, does it? What’s the over/under on Sid’s close personal friendship with Favre? Or more to the point on this website, LMA?
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
I still can't believe...
..the Strib allowed Sid to run the Bill Duffy article where he’s listed as a talent evaluator. Do we really need to run through the list of clients McHale’s old roomie stuck the Wolves with?
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
That positive aspect
of McHale’s departure has not been discussed enough. For sure, if McHale were still here, Jennings would be the Wolves PG at the 5th pick, even if Blond Ricky were still available.
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
Yeah, Sid’s column this weekend was so Gawd Awful I had to read it twice to make sure I wasn’t missing his drift or something. After that effort, either his fastball has just lost a couple more ticks, or he’s just gone “I’m Sid Hartman, I don’t like David Kahn, and there ain’t no editors here that are going to stop me” on us.
The absurdity of the piece was like an onion, where you can peel away to reveal more layers. Bill Duffy getting caught engaging in typical unscrupulous agent behavior with Mayo apparently isn’t enough to get his U of M credentials brushed under the rug. Or, my favorite, Duffy rambling on about how Rubio’s overrated because he’s young and flashy, and then goes on to pimp his guy Jennings (you know, Mr. Substance-Over-Style in the flesh).
Yep..
….this is Marko Jaric’s agent we’re talking about. The Kandi-Man too. Oh, don’t forget Mike James.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Terrell Brandon…Rasho Nesterovic…
http://www.bdasports.com/ssp/athletes
Like Steve Nash sez….“With Bill, he only has to tell you something once or twice before you believe it, too.”
Bill Duffy clarifiies his Sid remarks:
Agent Bill Duffy emailed the Star Tribune to clarify comments he made in Sid Hartman’s Sunday column. Here’s what he said:
"I want to elaborate a little more extensively on comments related to me in a recent Sunday article in the Star Tribune. I meant no disparagement toward Ricky Rubio. He is inarguably an immensely talented young man with a very bright future. I do know that both his agent and the Timberwolves organization are working feverishly for a solution. Having been in similar situations before, I wish them nothing but success in their pursuits.
"Additionally, I have no real insight into the coaching selection process being conducted by the Timberwolves organization. I feel badly if any of my commentary takes away from work being conducted by all of the parties and if I have offended anyone involved."
So yeah, Sid doesn’t have an editor ;)
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
If this had been a Nick Coleman
left wing political column, he would have been destroyed on talk radio for a column so blatantly self serving and pathetic.
yep...
…but even some of the “real” news has gone to the dogs since the political editor is a former think tank guy and coleman’s column buddy is a former writer for the think tank.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Perhaps this illustrates
Just how many close personal friends Sid still has at the Strib. Or the fact that everybody in MN knows the guy is a fossil and a living legend and reads him for the same reason we all eat hotdish—it’s just what you do in ‘Sota. I do think it’s also worth noting that I can’t think of anyone around here ever citing Sid as a source or as support for an argument. So, you know, at least we have that going.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
I was one of those people...
But only because I thought the idea of never watching the Wolves again after this trade was hilarious.
I think that the other 2 had the same thought.
I like how you have Calvin Booth as your picture. But I shouldn’t say anything because mine is a bear in a car.
Benefit to two smaller contracts?
In addition to further balancing the roster positionally, couldn’t you make the case that two smaller contracts give the Wolves more salary-matching flexibility as the trade deadline approaches and teams look to clear cap space?
And what is the salary-matching rule for trading players for draft picks? For instance, could a $3-4M/year player be traded to a team (like Phoenix in the last couple years) looking to shed payroll AND get rid of a late first-rounder? (Not that this particular scenario is common, but still …)
by Cheap Seats Erick on Jul 27, 2009 2:58 PM CDT reply actions
As far as I know
Draft picks don’t carry a salary cap figure, so they are $0.
I think you might have point with the two contract thing—it certainly would allow you to more precisely match salaries.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Draft PICKS don't carry a cap hold, but DRAFTEES do
Not shouting, just for clarification and confirmation
Once a player is drafted with a first round draft pick, the team immediately gets a cap hold.
www.canishoopus.com
2 Solutions
1. Kahn made the deal for Atkins to create 2009 Cap Space. So their’s a possibility something could be on the Horizon (AK-47, Marvin Williams, Josh Smith???). For a team looking to cut Cap Space this season- Atkins deal has a few million dollars worth of value.
2. Taylor did this to save money. From a Basketball Standpoint this is pointless (Which is fine considering the situation)
by Jose Cordoba on Jul 27, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly
We shall see which of these two was the motivation for the trade. Of course, if we observe option #2 it could be that option #1 was the intent of the trade but that a potential deal did not come to fruition. Thus, we may never know.
Bottom line: The roster moves are dizzying and we’d better not consider this roster even remotely complete until training camp. And even after camp mad trading may still ensue.
Don’t really have any beef with this trade though I think that Euro-stashing could have been more valuable than just a little salary cutting .. Other than that, not something that actually concerns anything else than Taylor’s pockets. Rather have it this way than giving up someone semi-servicable.
We got Rubio!
As long...
…as he keeps the bottom line at the end of the year in terms of cutting salary, I’m good with moves like this. They’re still looking at over $20 mil in expiring deals.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
There was an option missing from the vote
“I have no clue where this is going”
same here
The guy who might have an actual chance to play, Atkins, is the one we’re talking as salary dump and/or trade bait. Then, Damien Wilkens doesn’t seem to be able to contribute much, is unlikely to have an upside, certainly doesn’t fit the “young” profile.
Adding two players for one means that the “Garret SIler” chair has been refilled.
Bobby Brown would be better
than Chucky Atkins. Considering the price although D-Leaguers would be better than either.
by Jose Cordoba on Jul 27, 2009 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Quentin Richardson, don't unpack your bags.
If he was planning on it anyway. Kahn’s flexiblity probably includes dealing or buying out Q.
Someone other than Gomes has to play some minutes at the 3 (and Gomes will be at the 4 sometimes). Enter Wilkins. Pretty sure that’s all that is going on here plus the couple hundred $ probably didn’t hurt. I suppose they could have resigned Carney to play the 3, but this gets that done within the existing amount of payroll $ committed.
There is a 27% chance that Chucky will get nervous
because he is playing his old team….
Only cowards pray for rain.
I gotta think...
… the idea here is that this is a move to entice a pre-season trade out of someone who needs payroll cut in the worst way now. But for the life of me, precisely who they might be hunting down with this partially guaranteed contract isn’t something that we’ve discussed here (Chandler? No? Wishful thinking?). Kahn certainly doesn’t need more evidence that he is busy doing things, and he doesn’t strike me as that weak a thinker.
Chandler could be a possibility...
The Hornets almost traded him to the Suns for Ben Wallace with the intent to buy him out and save $ that way. They’d need to include Q or Cardinal, but one of those guys could also be bought out. They might also consider it if Pekovic was included in the deal.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions
A deal like that, though, couldn’t be done for 60 days since Atkins can’t be packaged with other players.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I saw that
It doesn’t make a lot of sense from a financial standpoint, which was the main reason Chandler was dealt for Wilcox and Smith last year. It also doesn’t make sense from a basketball standpoint because Chandler was a perfect complement for Paul. It’s got to be based on Chandler being injury-prone.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, yeah...
Chandler was injured about half of the year last year with about 9 ppg. Okafor played much better.
Wait and see...
It depends on what happens with Atkins. They gave up a second-rounder that’s likely to be high (their own) and one that would be in the middle (Dallas’ or Houston’s). ESPN said the Wolves have four second-rounders next summer, but I can’t for the life of me remember who the fourth one is coming from or if that was an erroneous report.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 5:15 PM CDT reply actions
I'm pretty sure we have (or had) three
Our own
Dallas from the Calathes trade
Houston from the Green trade
Only cowards pray for rain.
by Auswolf on Jul 27, 2009 5:20 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
sounds right...and agrees with this site
http://www.prosportstransactions.com/basketball/DraftTrades/2010.htm
except that the Wolves’ pick was sold to the Sixers, though it is conditional.
Looks like the Wolves are most likely out of the second round action.
How is Atkins' deal structured?
Does his team need to cut him before a certain point in order to not pay the unguaranteed parts of his deal?
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 6:08 PM CDT reply actions
Potential subplot of this deal
If Wilkins starts the season for the team, do they allow him to wear #21, which he wore last year?
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jul 27, 2009 6:31 PM CDT reply actions
The Wolves are saving that number
to give to KG after talking him out of retirement for the championship run of 2013.
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
A couple things
stick out to me after looking at this deal:
1. By trading for Atkins, the Wolves have done one of three things. They have either found a small contract to buy out or include in a trade, found a veteran to mentor their duo of young points, or admitted that Rubio isn’t coming over this season. Which one of these options is, as of yet, undetermined.
2. By trading away Etan Thomas, they have left themselves with no center behind Al Jeff. Who plays the pivot when Jeff needs a rest? K-Love, all 6’9" of him? No dice. Songaila? Negative. This team now has no natural center. Bad juju.
3. There has to be something else in the works. Kahn has taken the roster he inherited, put it through the shredder and tossed the remains in the fire. Nobody, save Jeff, K-Love and Flynn/Ellington are safe. Somebody else WILL be moved before the season.
4. This has nothing to do with the trade, this is just a gut feeling, I’ll probably post about it later…..but, I have a feeling Rubio will be trade bait. I don’t know why, but I’m personally convinced Flynn is the PG of the future in Kahn’s mind(and was going into the draft), and he drafted Rubio because he felt he had to, and intends on using his draft rights to make a move for a SF a la Gerald Wallace, Wilson Chandler(though NY will NEVER let him go), or one of the Blazers collection of Batum, Outlaw or Webster. (Note: I have zero evidence to support this theory, it’s simply a guy feeling)
What in the bloody hell does "thowed" mean?
Wilson Chandler
Isn’t any good. If the Knicks wouldn’t trade him for Rubio- then they have no grasp of Basketball value. According to WOW- Wilson Chandler had negative wins produced on the season. NEGATIVE. He’s not an efficient scorer nor a very good rebounder nor a good passer. He also has a below average Per and Wins Produced over at BBR. Quentin Richardson actually had better per minute production and he’s been traded 3 times already this off-season.
by Jose Cordoba on Jul 27, 2009 10:29 PM CDT up reply actions
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NOT EVERYTHING IS A RUBIO TRADE BAIT
in the two weeks or so since the draft rubio has been traded to every team in every basketball league in the civilized world. I’m sure there is an article that has him traded to that wonderful off world basketball market on Mars if I look hard enough. How many times does the man have to say I AM NOT TRADING RUBIO before people get it thru their skulls that umm……. hes not trading rubio unless that trade has the name kobe, or lebron in it.
Just to Clarify
I would trade Rubio for D12, Lebron, Kobe, CP3 or LMA.
by Jose Cordoba on Jul 27, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions
:)
It definitely was a short run.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Very good.
June 4th, 2009: "I wouldn't say in a month, but I'd be stunned if it doesn't look a lot different in the next 17 months."
by Definitely Not David Kahn on Jul 27, 2009 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Zgoda: more to come in the next couple of days
Kahn referred to the deal and Atkins’ contract as “savings we hope to realize in another way shortly, the next couple of days.”
Kahn also said,
“I’d like to get something big done before Stop-n-Pop leaves on his 2009 Liberal Education Family Values Tour.
“And stop calling me ‘Pork Chop.’”
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
I appreciate...
…the head’s up from POBO. ;) My liberal radar says he’s one of us.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
And...
“Has anyone heard from MAYNHOLUP since the weekend?” Texts messages to his agent were not immediately returned.
mayn wuss good mayn
forgive mah absence yall mayn ya boi steddy on de grind workin on a movie set mayn in MPLS mayn an we be grindin on dem 16 hour dayz mayn an when i git home mayn i see deze trades an i go like mayn hol up dat dont even change much mayn so i juss chief on de kill an bump sum Z-RO an Young Dro mayn u alreddy kno
az fo de trade mayn well less see mayn i liked de boi Etan mayn an Damien Wilkins mayn he not even a bench playa fo mah NBA2k teams so no i ont like dis trade unless iss openin up sumin thowed down de line nah mean mayn?
MAYN HOL UP!
hopefully...
…there will be some more info on the movie in the near future.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
On a side note:
God, I love how many people still care about a nothing, injury-prone Big, with a shitty locker-room attitude, being traded for an overpaid (MCHAIL!!!!!!) swingman of “dynamic” (thanks for the word Jim Peterson, I’ll overuse it too) purportions and a dude my age who has been mediocre forever.
They can say we’re losing money hand over fist, or that we’re 2nd lowest in the league in fannies in the seats, but this speaks volumns.
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 28, 2009 2:00 AM CDT reply actions
Volumes? Do you have a Cliff Notes version?
I simply don’t understand Kahn’s latest move
Strib writer Michael Rand calls it a paperclip trade.
That paperclip dude
Is pretty awesome. 14 trades to go from a red paparclip to a house? Eddie or not, that’s awesome.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Yeah, I should have said "Red Paperclip"
By the way, it seems that if you want that house (503 Main Street in Kipling Saskatchewan Canada) the red paperclip dude is now apparently willing to trade it for a burgundy 1990 Dodge Caravan.
http://oneredpaperclip.blogspot.com/
I just sorted through my office supplies and am prepared to offer him a red paperclip instead. I just have to convince him that mine is the original one he started with, so I’ve got a call in to Bill Duffy to be my agent.
Bill Duffy
has seen your red paper clip and thinks it’s ability to keep your papers together is overhyped. He just so happens to represent a blue paperclip that has the goods to keep papers from getting out of order.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Sorry
Grammatically should be “its ability” in the first sentence.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Just for fun… does anyone recall this kind of a trade EVER happening with McHale?
That is, did there ever some kind of trade happen where it was only part of a plan to do other stuff? Where there were no apparant talent changes?
I haven’t been following that look that closely so I can’t really think of any.
We got Rubio!
Of course not, McHale did not have the ability to think two moves ahead.
It was all he could do to pull off a single poor trade.
Th gap between McHale and Kahn has become comical. Time will tell how good Kahn is as a talent evaluator, but it is already clear that he is a skilled tactician. Everyone of his moves so far sets up at least two potentially good moves in the future. With McHale in was always blow your load and cross your fingers.
Heh
I wonder if Glen Taylor watches Kahn and thinks, “You know, if I hadn’t been so damned stupid and stuck with McHale forever, I might have KG, a championship or two, a full house every night, and millions in profits.”
Probably not.
Pining for a Troy Hudson/Marko Jaric backcourt.
Comparing Kahn and McHales Trades
Kahn: 5 trades in 67 days.
McHale: 5 trades in 2 years, 2 months.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Guilt and Shame...
over McHale’s way overlong tenure is the least Glen Taylor owes the team’s few remaining fans. I hope he regularly wakes up in a cold sweat and sobs himself back to sleep. If not for the fans, then at least for the money he’s lost.
I hope
he’s cutting. Like the girl on Real World 89. That’s the level of distraught he’s earned after all he put us through.
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 28, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
Remember when...
KG would subtly mention that he needs help to get a championship. You think he would have liked a guy like Kahn making the front office moves?
some blame may be ascribed to Taylor, though
Some years back, Britt Robson had a nice interview for City Pages with Glen Taylor — though not the one archived here:
http://www.citypages.com/2006-11-01/news/timberwolves-confidential-glen-taylor-tells-all/
A passage or two gave me the impression that McHale would continually burst into Glen’s office with his latest idea (or was it Bill Duffy’s?) for acquiring some imagined phenom or another. Taylor would always have to remind him of “The Plan”.
This vignette does point out, though, how much more freedom Kahn has apparently been given.
Definitely believe more moves in store...
and that’s OK with me. When we finally hire a coach, there will be more shakeups in order to fit his style of play. And, I don’t really expect to see Richardson and Atkins last past training camp (unless they’re moved w/out other players). A move I would like to see is to go after Von Wafer – a young SG with shooting range and playoff experience (heck, we could even move him near the trade deadline for more picks!).
If nothing else, The Wrath is doing his best to change the atmosphere around the Target Center. I’m hoping for 25-30 wins if everyone stays healthy and both J-Flynn and the Duke have solid rookie years.
Those 2nd round picks are valuable.
The only way they depreciate in value is if the Wolves become a high-seeded playoff team.
Atkins’ partially guaranteed contract is valuable, in that it can either save Minny some money, or as a chip in a deal with some team looking to dump salary. I don’t think the wolves are winners in this deal unless the latter happens.
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
What
do you think Kahn’s early reputation is among other GM’s? My guess is that they see him as someone to talk to, someone who has assests making it worthwhile to talk to and someone, based upon trades completed, who strikes a fair deal. Beside Kahn hinting that there is more to come, I’m guessing his developing image among GM’s make it likely more deals are likely.
My vision is a step closer to fulfillment...
I posted this a couple of weeks ago:
They will trade Ricky to Miami Heat, for Beasley, with filler on both sides. Pecherov & Cardinal may go, and other stuff comes back.
Miami is a Hispanic city, English is the 2nd language. Miami is a European vacation destination in the hoops season.
Stern would love it if Ricky ended up there. Do I think that the NBA front office is in Spain cuz Stern wants Ricky in MN? errrrmmm , maybe not. Would they make that trip if there was the potential for RR to end up in Miami? For sure.
Riley wanted Rose, not Beasley. Riley is not that excited about Beasley’s 1st year play. Riley could use a 7 foot 3pt shooter like Pech, and he’d appreciate Cardinal’s smarts. Wilkins becomes a salary dump chip for Riley, helping to make it happen. Ricky becomes plan B after Wade fades, spends a couple of years learning, and ultimately extends Wade’s career.
Will it happen? I dunno. Does it make the most sense from the perspective of the NBA’s European growth plans (and ultimate plot for WORLD DOMINATION!!) Yep, I think so.
And besides, Ricky’s mom would love Miami waaaaay better than NYC, Chicago and any other USA city.
It is the answer!!! Would Beasley work well with K-Lo and Big Al? I think so, but others are smarter on that topic.
I love it.
Let’s make it happen. One thing standing in your way….Mario Chalmers. Do the Heat like Rubio that much more than Chalmers to trade Beasley for him? I don’t know. Beasley certainly isn’t Blake Griffin, but he’ll be very good down the road. He was drafted based on ceiling and potential, Griffin on readiness. Beasley will never be as good as Griffin, but could wind up a very solid SF sometime down the road, a few years from now. A frontcourt of Beasley, Love and Jeff looks pretty decent, with Flynn and (player to be named) in the backcourt. But would Miami even do it? Things like this make my head hurt.
What in the bloody hell does "thowed" mean?
I don't know why Wolves would make this deal
although it could be part of a three team deal. I also think Miami would love to upgrade at PG.
While I don't agree with others who've quite overstated Rubio's value (S&P)
I’m certain the value for him should be far more than Beasley. The guy didn’t dominate, er, play all that well, his rookie year, and he’s kind of between positions. In this economic climate there’s one thing to remember: no one is close to buying a ticket just to see Beasley, for Rubio that isn’t the case.
Besides, Wade is about as ball dominant as an otherwise selfless player can be. Rubio would be useless without the ball in his hands. This is the reason that I don’t think Flynn is close to the right backcourt-mate with Ricky (I gave up on perimeter D a long time ago), and with Wade the problem would be even more so.
We should be talking about Flynn for the Beasley’s of the world, because that’s value for value, both economically and ball-wise. I’m loathe to the idea of trading lightning in a bottle for a duller version of maybe.
by TheFlingerofPoo on Jul 29, 2009 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions
Just to clarify..
…I think Rubio has more risk than any other pick in the draft and at the end of the day he’s still an 18 year old Euro League point who can’t shoot well and turns it over a ton. The kid is a huge risk and I’m not sure anyone has a clear idea as to how his game will translate to the NBA.
As for Beasley, I think the key with that guy is his head. He came on late last year and he still possesses the type of game that could hopefully translate into a hybrid 3/4 that could do a lot of damage in the league. The question with Beasley is this: Can he play the 3. If he can, then he’s worth it. Defensively, the team would be challenged but Beasley is no slouch and his 1st year wasn’t as bad (it wasn’t really that bad) as it is often made out to be. The guy is still freakishly talented.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by 














