Canis Hoopus: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

"On Saturday night, an agreement was reached between Dan Fegan, the agent for Ricky Rubio, Jordi Villacampa, the president of Joventut Badalona, and myself on behalf of the Minnesota Timberwolves to buy out the last two years of Ricky´s contract with Joventut so that he could play in the NBA next season.

While the term sheet was being finalized Monday night, Ricky informed me that, despite considering us his first option the previous weekend – and, admittedly, after some back and forth throughout the summer -- he preferred to stay at home to play for FC Barcelona, which earlier this summer had made a buyout offer to Joventut. He also reaffirmed that it was his intention to join us in Minnesota two years from now when he will be 20.

This morning I met with Ricky and his parents and told them that I understood Ricky´s decision. It was clear to me yesterday and in this morning´s meeting that the pressure surrounding Ricky and his family to remain in Spain for at least two more years had only intensified as the summer wore on and was weighing heavily on them.

The NBA is the best basketball league in the world, by far. As an 18-year-old man, Ricky would have been challenged on a nightly basis to a degree he has never experienced. In order for Ricky to meet this challenge fully, I believe it is important that his family and other people important to him were comfortable with the move to the NBA and fully supportive.

I also agreed with Ricky´s position that two more years of competition in Spain and the Euroleague will only aid his development and that he will be much more ready for the NBA when he joins us.

On the night of the draft, I explained that the decision to draft Ricky was not difficult – that he was 18, the youngest player in the draft, and we were a building team that could wait for him. Nothing has changed. When we received signals from Ricky this summer that he was considering accelerating his path to the NBA and joining us sooner, we threw ourselves into this process willingly and energetically, including meeting with Joventut on four separate occasions.

I explained to Ricky this morning that, starting today, I would now focus all my attention on the coming season for the Timberwolves and our current roster. We have begun the process to build a championship-contending team and this coming season will be an exciting one. I wished Ricky well and told him that, while I could not predict the future, I expected to see him in Minnesota soon.

I want to thank everybody who worked so hard on this process this summer, including Jonathan Blue and Dan Fegan of BEST and everybody associated with the Timberwolves family."

David Kahn's statement on the Rubio situation at the Wolves' official site.

6 months ago Img_2487_tiny Stop-n-Pop 234 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

From YahooSports Twitter Account...

…in regards to the above statement:

“Amateur hour in Minnesota: David Kahn throws Ricky Rubio under the bus”

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 11:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How did he throw him under the bus?

I think I missed that part.

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Sep 1, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah..

….i don’t get that either.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All that needed to be said

was that the Twolves negotiated as diligently as possible but it did not work out. Kahn gets props for his serious efforts (4 trips) and we move on.

Kahn did not need to say “an agreement was reached” and the family choose otherwise. That makes Rubio look indecisive, a mommies boy, whatever. The kid is 18. Give him some slack. Kahn did not need to label him as someone who does not stand up to his word. (About coming to MN)

by Just A Fan on Sep 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He effectively closed off interpretations...

Of what actually happened while respecting the player mentioned. Honestly, it wouldn’t have surprised me if he’d run this letter by Fegan before sending it out to ensure there was no ill will, considering how closely they worked in getting the buyout accepted.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

….I suspect everything is being done in tandem at this point…for better or worse.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But

Is there really any reason to give that much detail? I mean, with the exception of a few crazy NY’er, Kahn come out of this perfectly fine in my book.

He drafted Rubio as the BPA in a stroke of good fortune

He negotiated like crazy to get him under some very significant financial constraints

While it did not work out but we still have his rights (as an asset) with few financial constraints in 2011.

So why the need to go into the details of "having an agreement’? The only person that benefits is Kahn. No one else – especially the 18 year old player. To me, it’s an ego thing for Kahn to say “I did it” and make the kid look bad. No need for that. Kahn looked good already!

by Just A Fan on Sep 1, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kahn did NOT look good already

I happen to agree with everything he’s done so far. But the national media have chopped him up before this, and it will likely get worse in the wake of RubioGate. So a little defensiveness from the first-time POBO is understandable. Excusable? No. Understandable? Yes.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If anything..

…I think it displays a level of ignorance from Kahn about how this would be received nationally. He’s going to get torn up for this and we’ll all have to sit through national story after national story about how this is more of the same from the Wolves. It definitely could have been worded differently. However, in his defense, it is worded in a way that is completely consistent with what he has told fans from day one: patience + working with whatever the Rubios want is what they will do.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kahn promised Wolves fans access.

Not making us sit through “unnamed sources” versions of what happened is something I appreciate.

If Rubio backed out of the deal, that says more about him than Kahn.

by Punisher#8 on Sep 1, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a good point. It seems like he probably threw that bit in there for our (the fans) sakes.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rubio backed out

He has the chance to play now and get more money later and he declined it, would prefer to wait out Minnesota

I think that says 2 things
He will never play in Minnesota
Drafting Flynn means we can forget about Rubio

I really think Kahn really look back out of this

by gangusk on Sep 1, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kahn has done some rather questionable things in my mind

but drafting Rubio as the BPA. then negotiating like crazy to bring him over is, not one of them.

SNP is right. Kahn is going to get skewered for this letter in the national press. It did not need to go out that way. Rubio is going to get his fair share of blame too. Not a heart warming thing for an 18 yr to endure either.

With this past, I hope Kahn starts focusing on this year. Our roster is still badly out of balance and we have little to offer to fix it this year. We need to do somethings to get more competitive.

I renewed my seats – I have to say that I am not really looking forward to the games at this moment in time.

by Just A Fan on Sep 1, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha

You should read the FanShot I just posted for a possible silver lining. I don’t totally agree with it, but it’s not totally off base.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rubio in Spain, Kahn in US

The difference is that Rubio won’t hear a thing and will get paid in Spain

Kahn wil get ripped in the US
a. Could he have gotten more for Miller at the deadline
b. Was drafting Flynn the reason Rubio is not coming
c. Is the clock on for Kahn to trade him within 2 year. or he will stay in spain for 6
d. Should Kahn not be pig headed and traded Rubio or just drafted Curry, who looks good so far

Rubio has the choice to choose Minnesota and Spain and told Minnesota, it was not the right place for him, what he really said was, he would prefer to forgo FA money and money earlier, rather than go to Minnesota

by gangusk on Sep 1, 2009 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Joseph Heller would be so proud

If Kahn explains he gets grilled, and if he didn’t he’d get the same treatment.

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed...

…if he passed on rubio with 5 and 6, he’d get ripped for passing on the bpa with a crappy team. if he picks rubio and trades him to the knicks, he gets ripped for nepotism with his old boss. if he picks rubio and trades him for the houston deal, he gets ripped for getting took by morey and a team with very little assets to give back to a young team. if he makes an under-the-table deal with joventut, he gets ripped for joe smith part ii. now, it’s kahn’s fault for doing exactly what he said he’d do with rubio. these press jackals need to explain what they think he should be doing differently.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This exactly

How is it that Kahn can’t win? What happened is exactly what he said would happen. He tried his best.

by BDavige on Sep 1, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SNP

Kahn should have taken Rubio just as he did. He should have announced publicly that everyone on the roster, including all his draft picks, were available for the right offer. He is collecting and trading assets to build a winner – nobody is sacred right now.

Rather, he tried to justify his curious selection of 4 point guards. He tried to convince the media that Rubio and Flynn were compatible together.

Frankly, he needs to shut up. His openness is playing great to the fans and bloggers, but I think it is hurting his ability to do his job “quietly” behind the scenes.

by Just A Fan on Sep 1, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Curious selection of 4 point guards"

Really? I seem to recall that they drafted Lawson for Denver for a pick in next year’s draft and Calathes was traded.

I think arguing that Flynn is the reason Rubio didn’t come would need to be supported. Flynn looks like the correct pick.

by Punisher#8 on Sep 2, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all seriousness

this is why GMs get paid the big bucks.

You have to weather the storm until you prove you can consistently field a winner. If kahn can do that in 2-3 years then he can make moves like this and get the benefit of the doubt.

In the meantime the jackals will feed…

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, but...

Sam Presti gets treated like his turds are made of gold.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And isn't this the same as Hedo changing his mind

and chosing Toronto over Portland? Did YahooSports make the same claim of Kpritch?

by Sterno on Sep 1, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the thing.

Kahn would have been skewered nationally (and even panned lightly here) for not bringing enough donuts to the table. By saying “we got there, but it just didn’t work out,” he signals to fans, current players, prospective free agents, and the national press that he could, in fact, get the job done, and did. If Rubio feels like he has taken heat in this letter, it’s no more information than DKV had already reported, and, to be frank, he probably deserved the heat on this.

by TheH on Sep 1, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noice.

Rubio is fickle and Kahn threw him under the bus. Did Yahoo! even read Ricky’s statement about the matter?

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No regrets here, as I would gladly take Rubio’s rights over Miller & Foye or any of the available picks beyond Rubio….but…

Was Rubio entering the draft, just a ploy for him to get out of his DKV contract? Did he ever have any intention of playing in the NBA this season?

by DougW on Sep 1, 2009 11:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He wanted to play in the NBA

Rookie scale and Joventut asking for too much and forcing the negotiations had him picking the less risky way, which is getting some money, grow and come for free in 2 years.

If you find yourself in such a situation that’s what most people would do.

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Sep 1, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear David Kahn does a killer rendition of Dead or Alive’s You Spin Me Round" at the karaoke bar…

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 11:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Any word on the...

…Henk Norel buyout? I kid, I kid.

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 11:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, I'm shocked and pretty upset.

All along, I expected that Rubio wouldn’t play here this year. But never in a million years did I think THIS would be the reason.

After I spend countless hours reading, thinking, and discussing how Kahn could potentially get Rubio out of his buyout, and determining that it was pretty much impossible, he actually manages to do it… but then Rubio says no thanks.

WHAT?! I thought it was assumed all along that Rubio wanted badly to be in the NBA, but couldn’t get there because of the buyout. This is a much, much worse scenario then not being able to solve the buyout. It was solved. He could have been here. He didn’t want to. Ouch.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 11:57 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup. We’ll see how he feels in two years after growing up a little bit..

I think his rookie contract is grandfathered in even if the CBA changes. That is good.

I heard inklings of an “NBA only” buyout in 2011. That certainly helps soften the blow a little bit.

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two years time… Living near the seaside in Barcelona or spend future winters in Minnesota? I think he’d be even more reluctant to play for the T-Wolves by then.

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, he's lived there his whole life and still wanted to play here.

If anything, the 18 previous years would sway him more than the next 2.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed LoveTo

The simple fact that he is staying in Spain for two years is not the issue as far as I’m concerned—he gets to play and grow for two years in a still-challenging but less-demanding environment while his body matures, as well as delaying the moment his free-agency arrives. The issue is how it came about.

I (and almost everyone else here) believed that Ricky’s only issue was the buyout. All we have heard from him all summer is that he wanted nothing more than to play in the NBA, even that he would play for free(!). Now it turns out that that was clearly not true.

So if we no longer can accept his statement about wanting to play in the NBA as true, we also cannot accept as necessarily true any of his other previous statements, such as his saying he had no issues playing in Minnesota as opposed to some other NBA team. He said that, but his word is no longer reliable. Maybe the national media and mouth-breathing Knicks trolls were right after all, and he really isn’t that excited about playing for the Wolves.

I think the chances he will ever play for the Wolves have decreased significantly. It’s very disappointing.

If it wasn't for disappointments, I wouldn't have any appointments

by Jackdaw on Sep 1, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm

I share some of these same concerns. Apparently, under these circumstances, he did not want to come to the NBA. There are somewhat innocent explanations involving $$ and supporting his family, but I didn’t think it would end with Rubio choosing not to play in the NBA.

by littleboxes on Sep 1, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So does Fegan come out of this...

…empty handed? Supposedly he would only collect a commission on Rubio’s playing and endorsement contracts in the United States. Or does the beginning of Kahn’s statement indicate that Barca threw Fegan a bone as well?

by I.M. Fletcher on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

The last time he had a client (Yi) who didn’t want to go the team he was drafted by he lost face, ie Yi ended up signing with the Bucks.

I think he gets more leverage to try to get Rubio traded elsewhere now.

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The buyout was “solved”, but we still don’t know how much of that solution came out of Rubio’s pocket. My guess is that it was still a substantial amount of money, money he doesn’t have to part with under the Barcelona deal.

by SeanTO on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Exactly. Duh, folks.

The issue with the buyout terms was always that Rubio could get loans for whatever amount, but he’d essentially be playing for extremely little relative to other contracts he might get and he’d be accepting all the risk himself. That hasn’t changed, and of course it figures in the decision.

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is not good

I’ve held my tongue until now, waiting for the official word. There is nothing good about this situation.

First of all, Kahn did kind of throw Rubio under the bus by announcing that they reached an agreement, but that it was nixed by Rubio. Of course, Peyna had already said the same thing.

Second, for reasons I’ve noted before, it would be vastly better to have Rubio here getting better and growing with this team.

Third, all summer SnP and others insisted this was a math problem. The issue was the buyout, buyout, buyout. If they could get that solved, Rubio would be here. Well…no. They solved the math problem, and Rubio isn’t coming here.

There is at least some chance he never will. I know, I know, the Wolves hold his rights. He’s never said no to Minnesota. He wants the NBA. Still, he had the chance, and he isn’t here. Further, as someone who has negotiated agreements, when you get something you want, you finalize it. Now, it’s at least 2 years. A lot of things could happen; notably, Rubio could change his mind (something he seems to do with some regularity).

Do I think that’s likely? No. I’m not a complete pessimist. But things happen. Further, the reality is he could have been here, but chose not to be. The situation will be the same in 2 years—he’ll have the choice again. Who knows whether he’ll come to a different decision then?

Of course he said he looks forward to playing here…after he decided not to. It’s the only PR thing he could say.

It’s a bad situation. He had the chance, and he passed. That doesn’t make me feel good.

by Eric in Madison on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well said.

At least we can move on now. I’m still excited for the Jonny Flynn Era to begin and we can push this Rubio stuff out of here for a couple of years.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

I believed it was a math problem. I was wrong. I would have felt MUCH better about this if he hadn’t been here because he couldn’t get out of his contract with only our 500k.

My confidence of ever seeing him in a Wolves uniform just dropped like a rock.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. There is little silver lining here at all.

The only thing that helps our case is If the buyout is truly NBA only, and only $500,000 as reports seem to indicate. If that is the case, then Ricky earns 100% salary, which is a major difference from now and 2011.

My biggest concern here was whether another Euro team could make a bid as well, which would be a battle we would lose out on in a matter of 30 seconds.

But no, and I am not going to begin to get into this convo again, this is not Best Case Scenario, as some people are putting it.

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Well said. It was easy to forget about that part because they were figuring out a deal that would work for Joventut first, but that deal didn’t necessarily work for Rubio.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd combine this..

…with a sentiment from below: Who in the hell does Rubio think he is? I’ve never been a big fan of his talent and I think his boom/bust potential is off the charts. He’s still an 18 year old Euro point guard who can’t shoot well and turns it over a lot. He entered a draft that most American-born players would give their left arm to be taken in and now he’s hedging as if he couldn’t add up the numbers before he put his name in the hat.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jeez, he's 18 years old

Just think if one of us were in his position with his family and country pulling him one way and the NBA pulling him another. I can certainly understand why he’d stay put and be near his family and friends right now. We all were 18 once, did we care about our careers and money at that time? When he is 20, he’ll probably be more ready to leave the nest. I don’t think this is really surprising and if the wolves are patient it will benefit the franchise immensly down the road…

by DR_JPK on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think its bogus

to say that 18 years olds are incapable of making rational decisions that are in their best interests. We expect him to run a basketball team but don’t expect him to be able to choose between Spain and the NBA? C’mon…

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Were you ever 18?

And had the decision to go to a country where you didn’t speak the language, had no friends or family? Hmmm, get a clue TimAllen

by DR_JPK on Sep 1, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boo freakin' hoo...

He’s taking his family with him, he speaks at least a little English and I’m sure an 18 year old, rich NBA player would have a lot of trouble making new friends. Excuse me if I don’t feel sorry for the “tough choice” Ricky had to make.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is

that he can’t afford to bring his family and he wouldn’t be rich. His salary and his endorsements would go to pay his buyout.

by ckb on Sep 1, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Counter argument:

He’s not making these decisions in a vacuum as an uninformed single 18 year old person. He supposedly has fantastic representation with ample time to work out a pre-draft strategy. It failed. It failed in epic fashion and Camp Rubio deserves some blame here.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey a constructive argument

SNP, true, I agree that Rubio’s agent failed and that the draft strategy obviously failed when he slipped to 5th overall. Certainly camp Rubio deserves blame for this. This is probably one of the reasons why his parents felt it wasn’t worth it for him to go to the NBA right now.

And TimAllen, it is a tough choice. Money isn’t everything. How would you like to move to a place where you couldn’t communicate with anyone??? Also, do you want friends that you buy? I don’t feel sorry for Ricky, but it isn’t so clear cut. Give the teenager a break…

by DR_JPK on Sep 1, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree on the fantastic representation

Fegan’s biggest client so far was a Yi, who he tried to get moved to a major market. He absolutely failed in that. It’s only considered a “success” because, after a year of horrible play and finding out he was 4 years older than he said, the Bucks dumped him on a large market team

by McCleak on Sep 1, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was saying that..

….kind of tongue in cheek. I think he has clownish representation.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really. Fegan specifically is the primary agent for Drew Gooden, Nene, Jason Terry, Shawn Marion, Anderson Varejao, …

Lots of players from the US and abroad who got big contracts in the NBA.

There's Gotta Be More To Life

by Norsktroll on Sep 1, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it still doesn't excuse his clownishness..

…in the case of yi and rubio.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most teenage indecision...

Doesn’t play out with such high stakes, so publicly.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

Plus, don’t discount the nationalism that all players (but especially icons) experience.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, but the one thing we don’t know is the makeup of the Wolves offer. If, as Sean mentions above, our offer was constituted in part by a contribution from Ricky himself, then I think that negates the worry that he just chose Barca straight up. In that case, he saves himself significant money and I can understand his decision 100%.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Solved the math problem" is not a binary statement

What they did was, they got to a point at which Rubio could decide between accepting significantly less money and more risk in order to come to the NBA, and playing things safer for two years by staying home at 18. The buyout always had that problem. Rubio could have decided to pay the entire original buyout amount through loans, too, accepting more risk. Would you do that, in his shoes?

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If He Comes in 2011

All is well. If he doesn’t, well, we’ll have to decide where this fits in the all-time great debacles in franchise history.

Pining for a Troy Hudson/Marko Jaric backcourt.

by SBG on Sep 1, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It would be a clear-cut numero uno.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

Joe Smith penalties are still more severe. And for this to be a debacle, he would have to have no trade value whatsoever due to poor performance, injury, or not wanting to leave Europe.

by Ebomb on Sep 1, 2009 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

That effectively wasted KG’s prime years.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow - major over-reactions here

Its a #5 pick – you need to hit those, but how is missing out on this pick worse than Foye turning out to be a 6th man type player?

Eh. I’m just not that devastated. And Rubio is 18 and spindly. He is a player who could use a few more years getting stronger.

We’ll see in 2 years – in the meantime, a little patience.

Too bad we don’t get to see him play live though.

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of wasted draft picks...

Luc Longley, Felton Spencer, William Avery and the unforgettable Ndudi Ebi!!

by SoDakHmr on Sep 1, 2009 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every franchise has a list like that

Far fewer get a future HOFer at #5 like we did.

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No.

It wouldn’t. Having to trade Kevin Garnett currently ranks as #1 on that list.

by saudagg on Sep 1, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose having to trade Garnett was bad...

But in itself wasn’t a debacle. It was actually the right move at the time, and not a terrible trade even. A series of much smaller debacles led to the trade.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My vote for #1 is Smith Deal

Lost a pile of picks because they tried to hand Joe Smith a boatload of money? Joe Smith?

I think the number 2 is the Cassell and #1 for Jaric and his big sign and trade contract. I don’t think the Rubio deal should it go bad is cracking even that one.

Pining for a Troy Hudson/Marko Jaric backcourt.

by SBG on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup. The thing about Rubiogate is that at least Rubio had the chance of coming over and being a stud. Marko was never going to be more than he was when we traded for him at what, age 26? So to throw in a pick on top of it all was just ludicrous. Rubio was a gamble that may or may not pay off, the Marko deal was flushing a pick down the toilet.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gambling on a draft pick is inherent in the nature of the draft.

Did you want Kahn to pass on him twice and let him fall to #7? We’d never, ever hear the end of it. Ever. There was absolutely no choice. We had to draft Rubio. Gambling on Joe Smith, on the other hand….

by TheH on Sep 1, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh please

Joe Smith. Stephon Marbury. The departure of Googs in free agency, leading to Smith.

This isn’t even a debacle. Good grief. Get a grip, people.

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a debacle.

But if Rubio doesn’t come to Minnesota ever, you would have to put it up there.

That depends on what we get for him in a potential trade, I guess. If the Knicks trade happens, then it is a megadebacle.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

#1. Joe Smith’s under the table deal
#2. Roy for Foye
#3. Allen for Marbury
#4. Cassell for Jaric
#5. Rubio never plays for MN

by ckb on Sep 1, 2009 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

of course

that last one is hypothetical

by ckb on Sep 1, 2009 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still don't think it ranks ahead of:

Drawing #3 in the Shaq/Zo/Laettner draft with the worst record
Marbury trade
Brandon injury
Joe Smith contract
Sealy killed
Cassell injured for WCF

by Punisher#8 on Sep 1, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you should count four of those...

Unless we’re counting unintentional debacles.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about...

KG turning down 6 yrs/$103 mil then signing for $125 mil, effectively triggering the lockout and preventing the Wolves from keeping Marbury?

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Smith contract probably doesn't fit.

I was thinking more in terms of things that happened to the Wolves v. poor draft decisions i.e. Ebi>Howard, Foye>Roy.

Rubio declared for the draft knowing his buyout situation and what country the NBA is in. Between draft night and today, he either changed his mind or wasn’t entirely forthcoming re: his commitment to play. So I really don’t see this as a bad pick or mismanagement, the Wolves are being held at bay by the player as with Marbury.

by Punisher#8 on Sep 1, 2009 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I for one am just happy this saga is over for at least two years. Yeah we can have the occasional Rubio trade rumor pop up, but really, once the ink is on his contract with Barcelona, I don’t see why another franchise would trade something to acquire him before the summer of 2011.

I think Kahn may have thrown him under the bus, but that to me is appropriate retalliation. Kahn makes 3 separate trips to Spain, negotiates with the team for a buyout, finally gets the team to agree and Rubio decides against it. Rubio’s indecisiveness or shrewd negotiating cost the Timberwolves a lot of money on making those negotiating trips for no benefit other than Rubio himself. Rubio deserves to be taken to task here.

What happens in the future depends on the type of player Rubio develops into. It will be fun monitoring his progress on a better team, even if he doesn’t play for the Wolves, cheering for him to improve and increase his value will be the goal.

by Ebomb on Sep 1, 2009 12:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

About Kahn "throwing Ricky under the bus.."

After this, Ricky deserves to be thrown under a semi-truck (figuratively, of course. I’m not a psycho). This was a bold, blatant, stiff-arm.

Why does Minnesota get stuck with the prima-donna athletes that can’t make up their minds?

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I dont really think its negative, or throwing him under the bus at all. It was just stating the truth…that Ricky maybe didn’t feel “NBA Ready.”

I, for one, am definately open to the idea of discussing trade proposals (just not to NY)…at least until the facts are ironed out of course.

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup.

Kahn’s been a straight shooter with us fans since he’s been hired. Makes no sense to start clamming up now. The truth was coming out anyway. Might as well clarify and set the record straight.

by saudagg on Sep 1, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is an angle...

…I’m finding myself increasingly in agreement with. Who in the hell does he think he is?

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahaha

Actually laughed at that one. Funny.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SnP floats it over the plate...

…and TimAllen crushes it out of the park.

by John Doe on Sep 1, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you like, two different people?

I couldn’t find one single thing you said that made sense yesterday, but today you’re a beacon of rationale.

(drugs/alcohol/caffiene are acceptable excuses).

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not one single thing, eh?

I guess that means it easier to see someone as rational when you agree with them…

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I for one thought you were just really tired and cranky yesterday.

Which is how I feel today. And felt even before this BS.

by TheH on Sep 1, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Too true.

Again!

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

...and why doesn't he play for free if he allegedly loves this sport so much!

Instead he wants money and live in a beautiful city. I mean, really, who would have expected that?

There's Gotta Be More To Life

by Norsktroll on Sep 1, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As far as athletes that can't make up their mind...

We can go talk to Green Bay when we’ve had four years of this.

by John Doe on Sep 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fuck Rubio

So you say all along that you dream is to play in the NBA then when a deal is in place for you to live out your dream you turn it down??if you come in 2011 you better impress me because right now I hope you turn out to be Darko Millicic 2.0

by TonyO on Sep 1, 2009 12:10 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Do you know the deal?

How much of his buyout would he have to pay out of his rookie salary?

It’s not like he’s the only pick who has signed with a foreign team, see Nick Calathes.

Would you take a loan to buy yourself out of your current working contract and go work for pennies?
Even if the company next door (even if it’s a smaller one) offers to buy you out of your contract and pay you much better?

For God’s sake, just imagine yourself in his place. He can just wait for two years while making some money.

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Sep 1, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I appreciate the kindness and warmth some people here are showing Rubio...

True, he’s only 18 and it would be hard for him to come to a new culture and a lot of pressure, etc. etc. That’s fine. He still… a) declared for the draft KNOWING ALL OF THAT, b) led the Timberwolves on all summer, saying he wanted to come here if we could fix his buyout, and then c) changed his mind once we freed him up.

We’re allowed to be mad at him for this. It is a ridiculous, ridiculous display of mind-changing. Did he just all of a sudden realize that, “hey, the NBA is in America, and I’m not fluent in English, and I’m only 18!” ? No. Nobody made him declare for the draft. But he did, and the Wolves wasted a lot of time and resources trying to get him here, and I wasted a lot of time reading and thinking about him.

I’m mad at Ricky Rubio, even though he’s only 18.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Major point you're leaving out

He thought he would be picked #2 or #3 – when he didn’t it made the buyout much tougher.

On the “led us on all summer” part – that was just simple negotiation. If DKV comes down in their demands the deal can still work, very reasonable for him to play this out.

When all was said and done he had options there that had some advantages over his options here in the States. He couldn’t know that before he declared for the draft because the negotiations hadn’t taken place, the draft hadn’t happened and the offers from other clubs hadn’t been made yet.

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although

admittedly disappointed, I am just going to move straight past angry and go to acceptance and take a long term view. I get to watch a lot of J-Fly next season, Love improve, Big Al get back to being his usual self and hope that Ricky turns out to be what we all hope he will and be enough (when/if) he comes over to put us over the top. I am much happier with the wolves having J-Fly at the point than either Foye, Telfair, etc. The only other players that I would have rather grabbed than Rubio and Fly were Evans and Harden…since they were gone…no harm no foul.

If Ricky were to have never entered the draft and merely entered in 2011, where do you think he would go? If the wolves would have traded Foye/Miller for a 2011 draft pick, would we have cared?

by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 1, 2009 12:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Again with the J-Fly? Get out of here Stu Scott!

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As for trading him

…no. What was true is July is still true today: he has a lot more value to the Wolves than he does for any team that might trade for him, and thus there is no way to come to an agreement. I want more than any team would reasonably give, and so I wouldn’t trade him.

Frankly, as we talked about in the early days after the draft…I would rather keep his rights for 10 years and wish him luck in his European career than trade him for what I consider to be less than he’s worth to the Wolves.

by Eric in Madison on Sep 1, 2009 12:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's just stubborn

If you’d rather keep his rights for 10 years than trade him for something.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I realize that's not in the best interest of the Timberwolves...

I think I would too. It’s time someone sticks it to these athletes who think they’re above the 99.99% of players who play for the team that drafts them.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a great start to his Twolves career (Khan or Rubio)
While the term sheet was being finalized Monday night, Ricky informed me that, despite considering us his first option the previous weekend – and, admittedly, after some back and forth throughout the summer — he preferred to stay at home to play for FC Barcelona,

The important bit

What was the Tagline the Twolves were selling Flynn/Rubio with again after draft night?

fast and exciting or something? I cant remember

by WhaHuh on Sep 1, 2009 12:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

well...

it’s certainly been exciting.

by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 1, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exciting like a kick to the gut

I bet Rubio dropping to five was Kahn’s worst nightmare. If Sac-town takes Rubio, we take Evans or Curry and avoid all of this mess. Kahn would be talking about our new and improved backcourt, Geoff Petrie would be getting roasted on ESPN and the people at Canis Hoopus would be saying, “boy, I’m glad we didn’t draft Rubio!”

Instead, he’s the laughing stock of the NBA this morning and was just spurned by an 18 year old punk.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

kings would have made the right decision and traded him to a big market team

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Instant gratification is not always the “right decision”

by Ebomb on Sep 1, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not so much instant gratification but to avoid another fran vasquez.

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t agree more Ebomb. I think it’s how bad we have felt as fans of this franchise that makes us extra sensitive to something like this.

If this were a successful franchise we’d be sitting back chilling, delighted at our smart FO who will maximize this pick now or in a few years.

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with that completely.

Kahn had no choice but to take Rubio – the fans at T Center that night would’ve rioted if he hadn’t – but I would bet anyone that Kahn was envisioning this whole nightmare playing out as he made the selection.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought the same thing.

I think we had our hearts pretty set on a Flynn-Harden or Flynn-Evans backcourt, and got more and more nervous with each pick. I thought this a week after draft night, when it became apparent how difficult this Rubio situation was going to be.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no his contract is grandfathered in under the current CBA he could lose everything by doing this

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It's disappointing because I wanted to see him here

And especially disappointing because Kahn actually did it when it seemed extremely difficult — the main obstacle always seemed to be reaching agreement with Joventut. But if anyone really expects an 18-year-old to make all choices with conviction and certainty, I’d like them to think back to their own days at that age. It’s not definite that he’ll be here, but I still think it’s probable. Too much work has happened since the draft for he and Fegan to not be serious about playing in the NBA, and if he wants to do that, he has to sign with the Wolves.

I don’t think Kahn threw him under the bus; he reported accurately and without bias, and though some might take that information and hold a grudge against Rubio, Kahn wrote in a way that was respectful to him and his choice.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

The “amateur hour” pre-fab storyline necessitates this reading; the text itself does not. The haters strike again.

by TheH on Sep 1, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well put

get the page view and then provide nothing else.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Scare headlines!

My favorite from Bowling for Columbine, it was a news show teaser (film at 11 type):

“You ride them every day,
but in an instant,
                  
an escalator can mangle you
or a loved one.
                   
We reveal why you may be
riding on a stairway to danger!”

Pretty sad, they definitely do work, but they just amp our fear and adrenaline and leave us stressed. Same with this Kahn/Rubio coverage.

by Django Z on Sep 1, 2009 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

in other words he decided winters were too cold in minnesota as he had originally complained….

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's a kid.

I, for one, give him a break.

If he were my 18 year old, I’d want him in Barcelona for two years, making more money than if he came to the USA.

My guess, his parents had a big influence on this decision. Look at it from a parent’s point of view:

- He makes more money staying at home.

- He has an easier schedule and good coaches.

- He avoids the distractions of NBA road games and NBA lifestyle for now, when he is 18 & 19 years old.

- He gets to go to the NBA when he is 20, and make tons of money.

- He will be better prepared physically, emotionally, and with better knowledge of the game.

- He stays at home with his family, visits his gramma, helps his sister play pro ball in Europe and gets ready to break the knot.

Clearly, from a parents point of view, it is better for him to stay in Barcelona — I say that as a parent of grown kids who did crazy stuff when they were 18 to 20 years old.

It’s not just Ricky that has to grow up. We do too. This is not all about us, it is also about a young man and his family.

I try to keep my perspective. We are all acting like the worst stereotype of parents pushing their kid to be a star.

As for Kahn tossing RR under the bus: I don’t see it that way. He is being factual, and the situation deserves it. Ricky deserves to see those words, and Kahn deserves to get the story out.

I’m sure he sees what we all see — RR may never come over, but that is a very low probability event, IMHO. The real worry is that by 2011, Fegan will have created a situation where RR may want to go elsewhere.

Big deal, we will get compensated, and the development of our team will be well down the road.

I’m relaxed. I hope we all are in a day or two.

by timmuggs on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

What I’m upset about is not his decision to stay home. I’m 18, and I wouldn’t want to go play pro basketball in another country in a cold city either.

But wait to enter the draft then. Why enter the draft, insist that you would play in the NBA “for free,” bring a media circus around you, make a team work their butts off to free you from you contract, and THEN change your mind?

That is fully rippable, in my opinion. No matter your age.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because

  1. Fegan is a douche and
  2. no one thought he’d slip to 5

would be my guesses.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fegan does probably have a lot to do with it. So when I direct my venom at Ricky Rubio, I’m hoping it also lands on his representation.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right now to me Rubio is like a girl who agrees to go to prom with you then after you arrive at the house with the limo to pick her up she tells you that she’s going with her exboyfriend instead. The ex then promptly shoes up and plants a kiss on her lips in front of you. You make yourself feel better by her telling you “I promise we will go next year.” Babe your words are like the weather in Minnesota with the same reliability.
Sorry I have been an adamant Rubio supporter but right now he can F off for all i care.

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He doesn’t make more money staying at home

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Over the next 2 years he will make more money.

Enough to make his parents comfortable.

Long term, he would make more money coming to the USA, but that assumes he does not get injured, he is a star, and other unknowables.

by timmuggs on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

cannot be ignored:

Over the next 2 years he will make more money.

 If I were advising him, I would tell him to do just what he did. It sucks for Wolves fans for now. All other things being equal and static, he’s just delaying his big NBA payday. Yes, CBA, 2011, buyout, 6-year contract, blah, blah, blah. But what we know to be true is:

1. The Wolves own the NBA rights to Rubio.
2. Ricky still intends to play for Minnesota when he comes to the NBA.

FWIW, despite being a wonderful country full of good and decent people, Spain’s economy is in even more precarious shape than the U.S. of A’s. How that may or may not affect Barcelona’s ability to pay Rubio in the coming years, I do not know. Perhaps some of our Spaniard friends can weigh in?

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

We KNOW #1 is true. I don’t think we can have the same certainty about #2.

by saudagg on Sep 1, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As someone who...

… had to help support his family as a teenager, I sympathize with the desire to make sure one’s family is as comfortable and secure as they can be right now. I gotta believe that there’s a crap-ton of pressure on this kid to support a family network, and cutting back on your parents’ and family’s allowances can’t feel good if your only argument is to move ASAP to a foreign country at 18 to play basketball.

by TheH on Sep 1, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Rubio is actually a player...

He just cost himself $30 million from his 3rd NBA contract. He and his family are either admirable for not caring about money, or extremely incompetent.

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Sep 1, 2009 12:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s assuming he’s worth a Max Contract. Prudent planners don’t always look at the best case scenario, Rubio isn’t guaranteed to be good enough and stay healthy enough to earn two max contracts. If he busts, clearly staying in Europe is better for his financial future.

You may limit your maximum lifetime earnings, but you also increase your minimum lifetime earnings. It’s all a risk, and it’s up to Rubio to decide how he wants to play it. The wording of the article, his comments, and likely the track record of players like Sergio Rodriguez and JC Navarro may swayed him that a max NBA contract is not a certainty.

by Ebomb on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's why I titled my post..

“If Rubio is actually a player… "

This decision does make me wonder if he has doubts himself?

"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"

by mutleyil on Sep 1, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you loveto, I agree totally

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

rubio wolves money this year 3.3 million minus 700k to buyout =2.5 million

rubio barcelona 1.4 million

umm simple math

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Barcelona’s money is tax Free. So take 3.3 Million, after taxes is $1.98 Million, then put $700K of your after taxes earnings to the buyout, then you get his take home pay, $1.28 Million.

Rubio Barcelona = $1.4 Million.

Then if you look at expenses of maintaining two residences, it’s not as simple.

But I agree he threw his hat into the ring to be drafted, he knew the ramifications. Shouldn’t be enough of a difference to make this decision.

by Ebomb on Sep 1, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are forgetting about taxes

Barcelona’s deal is after taxes, is my understanding.

The Wolves money will be heavily taxed — he will owe roughly half of the $3.3m to taxes or Fegan. Then he has to pay the 700k buyout out of the remainder. Plus buy a house and so forth.

by timmuggs on Sep 1, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

fagan does not get 50% of rubio’s money.
the agent in spain still gets his cut.

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

on your point I think with the tax contributions the money from both teams is about =. the tax rate in spain is 45% if the poster was accurate. I believe the tax cap here is 39% for the wealthy. The buyout contribution should be tax decuctable. so he would get taxed at I think 2.7 million or something like that. about 2 million would go to fagan.

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry 200k would go to fagan 10 percent

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

Fegan would get nil on Rubio’s rookie scale contract. At least, that is how these things usually work.

Fegan is a loser in this whole scenario.

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so right now fagan is punching rubio in the face lol

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ebomb is right though no matter how you cut it the differences are not big enough to make a difference.

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do we know Rubio didn’t have to chip in to the “offer” that the Wolves presented? We haven’t seen a breakdown of the offer..

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, as often pessemistic I am about the Wolves, I have a tough time Rubio stymied us. It was well known we couldn’t completely cover the cash.

The buyout details will be most telling as to how the situation will ultimately play out. (NBA Only, price, etc). I guess we will have to (surprise) wait

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s really the only thing we have to hold on to as far as proof that Rubio didn’t outright choose to screw us over. Fortunately, it seems pretty likely that he would have had to cover a portion of it. I recall hearing that Barca’s offer was after-taxes, so 5.3 million or so post-tax is a huge amount for the Wolves to try and meet. Given what we’d heard about the numbers (a few mill here and there for endorsements, the Wolves 500k contribution etc.), I can’t imagine that RR didn’t have to chip in..

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

as far as I could read from the spanish boards, don’t know how reliable they were.
wolves 500k
Rubio 700k
games with DKV 700k
holding company(assuming they were a company created to hold the money from rubio’s endorsements) 1.4 million
don’t know how valid they are but those were the numbers on thier forums

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That doesn’t seem to get anywhere near the amount that FCB offered, but even if we take it as true, that’s 700k that he doesn’t have to pay if he stays in Spain.

I’m OK with this if his intentions of coming here are true… if not, then it sucks but the pick was still the right one.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget about MN state taxes

39% is for the Feds. MN has among the highest state taxes in the USA, which would put it at close to 10%. Those who live in MN can provide a better number.

Then there is Social Security deductions, and there may well be deductions from the NBA for pension plans, health care and so on.

by timmuggs on Sep 1, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This math was all over the DKV boards. It was why thier fans all thought he was coming here. he makes after all is said and done almost a half million more in the us than in spain. This isn’t about money

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

so really doesn’t want to be in minnesota?

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This sort of claim...

…would be better received if it came with a link.

by John Doe on Sep 1, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is a link to the DKV boards in another forum, you will have to translate them though

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry..

….his Euro team can cover taxes while the Wolves cannot. The buyout is not tax deductible and his federal income tax rate would be 35% with state taxes still to be filed in Minnesota and whatever state he would play in. It’s still simple math but a far different answer than what you are implying.

Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 1, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the covering taxes I think balances out the offers a lot

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you really wanna make the glass half full instead of half empty … it does provide us free development for him … but i’d still rather integrate him now..

We got Rubio!

by Wim (Belgium) on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"Free" development

Isn’t so free when you take into account all of the expenses related to the buyout, and more important, the lost ticket/merchandise/advertising sales from Rubio not being in a Wolves’ uniform. I think his development is costing the Wolves quite a bit, actually.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

point taken

We got Rubio!

by Wim (Belgium) on Sep 1, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know we discuss the basketball benefits of 2 more years in Spain, but ignorance is not bliss. This factor is EQUALLY, if not MORE important to a franchise in the dumps right now.

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

Statisticians have show that what drives revenue (including advertising, merchandise, and most especially tickets) is wins. Unless you think Rubio was going to be worth 10+ wins this year than his impact on the bottom line was going to be a few more season tickets, a few single game “curiosity” tickets, and a few Rubio jerseys. It was a few thousand or (maybe) ten thousand dollars, which will be made up by not paying him this year.

by McCleak on Sep 1, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where are these stats?

I think name recognition is a big deal.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here

http://dberri.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/the-memphis-mirage/

You’ll have to check out his book for full details. It’s not that good all the way through, I would recommend perusing it. His section on ticket sales is (IMO) the most developed in the book. Anyway, long story short: wins, market size, and the opposing team’s stars (and not your own), in that order.

by McCleak on Sep 1, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

...And now Kings play a part

Sam Amick, King’s beat writer
http://twitter.com/sam_amick/status/3692067015
Kings derailed Rubio’s plan. His people swore all along he would’ve played in NBA this season if Sac took him.

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And...

…the NBA was always his first choice. Do you even have a point here?

The kid changed his mind and then stated that he would come over in 2 years.

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So they say

but that was then. A couple of days ago the Wolves had an agreement in place, that was nulled by Rubio et al. So what was said and done (and then undone) don’t mean a whole lot right now.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there’s a point if you read the twitter…

by wayno on Sep 1, 2009 12:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I did read it.

And that info was from the draft. Time has moved on, right? I forget, did he workout for the Kings?

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes the kings were the only team he worked out for

by remiel6 on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ah. Cool.

I couldn’t remember. Well, the Kings decided to draft Tyreke instead. Good luck with that. (Actually, I really like Tyreke, but not more than Rubio.)

by Grover M on Sep 1, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless of all of this, lets remember that we have long wanted a risk taker in the front office who dreamed a little bit. Rubio always was, and still is, a must pick at 5, and none of us should questionthe selection. Tyreke Evans? Whoopie dink. Curry? Meh.

 We should have no qualms with the selection, just crabiness of the outcome. It is what it is, for now. At worst, we pawn him off and get some value for the kid and move on. The fact that there is this much buzz in early September about our team is evidence enough we are over the McHale hangover. Brighter and bold days still lie ahead…

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup. If nothing else, Kahn showed us that he’s willing to do what it takes as a GM. He’ll go out on a limb and make a ballsy move if necessary, and he’ll put in the work to help the franchise succeed. It totally sucks that this wasn’t resolved to our satisfaction, but at least know the POBO is looking out for the fans.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some thoughts

First: I don’t think Rubio was thrown under the bus. And not in the “it’s factual and the fans deserve the truth” way. If you read Rubio’s statement you can see that he says the same thing as Khan. As someone else who has worked around the dark arts of media, this definitely was a coordinated statement, meaning that Rubio’s camp was fine with this being the stated reason. Note: I am not saying it is not the reason, but this isn’t Khan just shooting Rubio from the hip. Additionally, if the stated reason is true (that Rubio didn’t think he was ready for the NBA) than kudos to him for owning up to that and getting more seasoning. I don’t think it’s any more special than a college player delaying a year or two before entering the draft, but if the reason is true, than I think it’s actually speaks well of him.

Second: The response to this by the national media proves how absurd they are. First they beat up on Khan for drafting two point guards. Now they’re going around beating up on him because he won’t have two in camp. It’s ridiculous. Personally, I think it’s part of a belief that we are entitled to see Ricky Rubio play major minutes in the NBA this season. for an excellent example of this, check out Bill Simmons twitter statements. It’s pretty dumb, though “Question for David Kahn’s press conference: ‘Do you think the next Minnesota GM will be able to sign Rubio in 2011?’” makes me laugh. Anyway, no one is entitled to see Rubio this in any league this year.

Third: Khan probably realized that there was going to be trouble getting Rubio over here, hence going with Flynn with the very next pick. So people may want to hold off on referring to him as a disaster, just yet.

Fourth: When referring to Khan as either a disaster or a genius, remember that the Wolves have yet to play a single game under his direction. They are currently 0-0. Whether you think this year’s team is his first team, or next year’s, or even the one after that, the fact is we don’t know how this is going to shake out yet.

Fifth: Ricky Rubio is going to be good. Remember, at 18 he won defensive player of the year. That’s no joke.

Sixth: While I am not sure if this was the best outcome for the Wolves, I think it is the safest. Check out Britt Robson’s stellar article for an excellent breakdown of how this benefits the Wolves.

Seventh: Because of this the Wolves have an additional $3 million to play with this year. If they’re smart and only tender a 1 year to a wing, they will have an additional $3 million to play with in 2010. That’s going to be useful.

Eighth: Rubio’s road to the NBA still goes through Minnesota.

by McCleak on Sep 1, 2009 1:51 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Isn’t there a cap hold for Rubio? I’m not sure on specifics, but I recall hearing that thrown around. Can anyone confirm/deny if he counts toward our cap or if he’s cap-neutral until he comes over? That’d be great to have another 3 million to play with next year…

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cap holds count during the offseason, yes

If memory serves, cap amounts on unsigned draft picks do not apply during the season, but do during the offseason. A salary cap FAQ:

The scale amount is excluded from the team salary on the date he signs a non-NBA contract or the first day of the regular season, whichever is later. The scale amount goes back onto the team salary on the following July 1 or when his non-NBA contract ends, whichever is earlier. In other words, these cap holds are removed for players playing elsewhere during the regular season only.

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Safest for both parties, maybe not best for either
Sixth: While I am not sure if this was the best outcome for the Wolves, I think it is the safest.

Rubio ameliorates his financial risk and works on his game, the Wolves see the kid develop for a couple more years, put off the next contract for him, and so on. It’s not a best-case scenario, but it’s certainly no disaster except in the eyes of those with no attention spans.

by feral on Sep 1, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

About the offer

None of us knows anything about it.

For all we know it could be Wolves’ maximum 500k and Ricky paying the other $5M + half of his earnings during his whole carreer.

So please guys stop attacking him for not agreeing. Coming to the NBA is his dream, if he didn’t take the deal I’m pretty sure his reason wasn’t just to piss the fans.

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Sep 1, 2009 2:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point!

Reading this thread, it seems like an awful ot of folks think that the whole thing was a plot to pissoff the fans.

It’s all about us! Waaaah!

by timmuggs on Sep 1, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, but we can infer...

…that it was complicated for Ricky. My Catalan friend is saying Ricky thought it was all too complicated. So my guess is that a lot if not all of his actual NBA pay was going to the buyout, maybe for the first two years. And he would also send some intitial endorsement money (this appears to be the only way the offer got close to $3.5M Euros). And he would be dependent on endorsements and other income streams for the money he actually would live on. Obviously, I am guessing, but pretty much every Spanish article I read had some comment about the Wolves offer being ‘ghostlike’ or ‘if it is real’ and so on. And Ricky is saying it was too complicated. So, given the financial hit, the money uncertainty, and the low probability he would instantly be an above average player, he probably made the most rational decision a 18 could – stay close to home, get an exact, known amount of money, play on a great Euro team.
  I want the kid in a Wolves jersey, so I am not happy, but I am not going to roast the kid. Fegan no doubt had him going 3 – almost everybody did – and that is about $750K more per year I think.

(678): Words of Wisdom: ordering a pitcher of whiskey cokes, putting a straw in it, and calling it your drink is not socially acceptable

by CaliWolf on Sep 1, 2009 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just curious

What’s that T Rex record? And I hope you enjoyed that Sporting Gijon match, wasn’t a bad start.

by museum on Sep 1, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's the original Get It On single

About the Sporting game, I couldn’t watch the game, just the highlights, but it’s good to see Ibrahimovic scoring his first goal with Barça

Nobody expects a Spanish Acquisition!

by DaniBCN on Sep 1, 2009 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

09 offseason

So when the dust clears – the 09 offseason to date yields the hope of Rubio 2011, Songaila, Pecherov, Wilkins, Hollins, and likely buyouts of Atkins and Blount at the expense of Foye, Miller, Telfair, Smith Madsen and a 2nd round pick. Hard to believe we get criticized nationally.

by Heggiebaby on Sep 1, 2009 2:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like we gave up junk for Rubio + Junk.

I see where you’re trying to go with this, but it’s not working very well.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. I think I’m just grouchy about the whole process. I actually can’t say I would have played it any differently. Although I wonder if they still trade Telfair knowing Rubio’s not coming.

by Heggiebaby on Sep 1, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well we certainly all have the right to be grouchy :(

Not sure on Telfair, but if they’re really angling to be bigtime players next year I bet Kahn would have done it anyway. Flynn + Atkins or Flynn + Telfair really isn’t a big difference for a rebuilding team.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the eventual end point of this Rubio circus leads me to feel great apprehension regarding “being big time players” next year. I envision similar circumstance were the 1st and 2nd level free agents are offered the lucrative deals but decide its in their best interests to play elsewhere.

by Heggiebaby on Sep 1, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah yes, the old “woe is us, who would want to come to Minnesota” meme.

Might be the case, but who knows. Players follow the $$ more than anything. Cap space also allows the team to be a bigtime player in the trading market, so our fate isn’t solely dependent on free agency. By being under the cap we could take back a big contract without matching salaries, so it gives the team bigtime flexibility. If they want to, they’ll be able to make a splash one way or another.

Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.

by Xand1 on Sep 1, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I said I’m grouchy, but I’ve followed the club from the begining and they’ve provided plenty of ammunition for skepticism. I also feel like I’m waiting for some payoff on the use of their assets. I was looking for something lageer out of the QRich expiring then another buy out and maybe that will still occur. I agree with George Karl that losing becomes a powerful coach and I fear that our young nucleus (with potential admittedly) is developing in a challenging environment. I write this with the thinking that Rubio here meant a modest increase in wins (10). As I read this back I realize I’m rambling

by Heggiebaby on Sep 1, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s disappointing, but hardly the end of the world, or even a bad thing for our rebuilding process.

For one thing, 18-year old Rubio wasn’t going to step in and be a star. He’s not physically strong enough, the way star youngsters like LeBron and Derrick Rose have been. It might be better to have him bulk up a little bit and improve his conditioning in the next two years.

For another, the point guard battle with Flynn was going to be there this year, or in 2011. Either way, we’ve got two point guards and that issue will remain until one is traded or one proves to be clearly better than the other.

Finally, if the Wolves sit tight this year with Flynn-Ellington as the backcourt, we’re going to lose a lot of games, regardless of how well Love and Jefferson play. I think a best-case scenario is 30 wins, which would probably be bottom 5 in the league. So, we’ll be in the running for one of the bigtime prospects in next year’s draft, and we might have the makings of a really strong young team, by the time we add Ricky in 2011.

It would be nice to have the other pieces in place, like a true center and/or scoring guard, by the time Rubio comes in as the finishing piece. Since I liken this “stockpiling talent” idea of Kahn’s to the Kings of the early 2000s, a transition from Flynn to Rubio could be analogous to their transition of White Chocolate to Mike Bibby—a move that took them from good to great. In our case, maybe it’ll take us from mediocre to good—or something like that.

by Andy G on Sep 1, 2009 3:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

and 16 games behind 9th Place Phoenix

30 games is a bad season and would give us a lottery pick. And I think that’s our best-case for wins, if we don’t trade for a guard.

by Andy G on Sep 1, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great TrueHoop Article on the situation

Finally a perspective that is more than, “David Kahn is an idiot”:

Here’s the link.

by TimAllen on Sep 1, 2009 3:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good Article

Thanks for posting. Captures some of our argument as well. Hope you don’t blame Rubio solely, this article points out the mistakes teenagers inevitably make. Long term the Wolves are still in a good position here…even if they end up trading Rubio’s rights….

by DR_JPK on Sep 1, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I liked that

If he’s right about Flynn taking away his chance at being a starting PG for our team, that’s great. Everything I’ve said has been based on the theory that we would want him to come over and be our starting PG. If in two years, we’re all saying “Rubio might be the best prospect in Europe, maybe one of the best Euro prospects ever, but we have Jonny Flynn, so screw him,” that would clearly be pretty great. We’d be in a pretty good spot, and if Ricky keeps improving, his value would be higher, and we’d get something for him. Even if people thought we had to trade him, he’d still bring good value because of teams competing in their offers. And even as a huge Rubio fan, that would be fine, because if Flynn has made him unnecessary, that’s pretty damn great for us. This is one of the big reasons I like the idea of him staying there.

Also, I would LOVE someone with a ton of international finance expertise (probably not someone on here) to do a deep analysis of the two deals and the money on both sides. Even in his press conference today in Barcelona he mentioned the Wolves not being able to step up to the plate financially. You can find a brief report in English on that on FC Barcelona’s site.

by museum on Sep 1, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zgoda just updated his blog with this nugget

“Rubio was introduced by his new team in Barcelona today and said going to Minnesota would have "complicated" his life significantly and called it a "risky" move. He also said he didn’t see the Timberwolves as a team where he could grow as a player and win championships.”

http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/wolves/

by Eric in Madison on Sep 1, 2009 4:49 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I read elsewhere that was (not surprisingly) an incorrect translation.

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The complicated part seems real...

..according to my Catalan friend, and as I alluded to above.

(678): Words of Wisdom: ordering a pitcher of whiskey cokes, putting a straw in it, and calling it your drink is not socially acceptable

by CaliWolf on Sep 1, 2009 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and Kahn acknowledged that in the conference call...

But the potentially juicier nugget might’ve been a fabrication.

by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 1, 2009 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well it certainly would have made things complicated for him. That isnt news or anything to fret about. Some of this stuff is worthy of PerezHilton.com!

by WallyW0rld on Sep 1, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He said something

at the press conference about wanting to win championships with Barca, that’s probably where the mistake came from. And he talked about it being complicated. I don’t have a full transcription, just a read a couple Spanish articles. That Zgoda blog also mentions that Kahn’s offer was still smaller than Barca’s, and that it included a bunch of future endorsement money. That’s still money coming out of Ricky’s pocket, things like that make me understand his decision a little.

by museum on Sep 1, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll say my piece on this

I think this is the best thing for Rubio, the Wolves, and maybe David Kahn (less so for him).

Maybe fans would have bought tickets because of Rubio this season, but if he had flopped, they wouldn’t have. Yes, Kahn struck out in getting him over, but really, what Barcelona offers vs what the Wolves offer is not in comparison. Barcelona is the best team in the 2nd toughest professional league in the world. (I don’t consider any college league good enough to beat European teams.) Rubio’s value stands to go up as he is only 18 today (and turns 19 next month), but more importantly, will get a chance to improve on everything the Wolves need him to improve on. More importantly, this will be done for free.

I think Kahn is playing the fool somewhat, because even though he’s getting hit nationally, he’s also in a no-win position as far as some are concerned.

I know one thing, and only one thing here: Only time will tell who is right here.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Sep 1, 2009 5:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rubio not ready for NBA today

From watching his recent game against Poland (who of note plays for Poland?) Rubio was secondary and did nothing outstanding in what was a closely contested game. Giving him time to mature in his home country will be a good thing for him and his game, and therefore for the Twolves as well. This is a better outcome than him coming over too soon, riding the pine, losing playing time, and not progressing as he could have otherwise. Am I disappointed that he’s not playing here now, somewhat. I still look forward to him playing well for the Twolves in a year or two.

by Zev on Sep 1, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do have to say,

this entire Rubio saga has made me think really highly of David Kahn.

First, trading Foye and Miller for pick 5 was a gutsy, proactive move. Second, drafting Rubio (although that was a no-brainer). Then, starting the day after draft day, having a clear plan, communicating it to the fans (he went on SO many radio/TV shows the day after to explain himself), and executing it.

He went to Spain three times, negotiated, by all accounts, relentlessly. He somehow came up with a buyout agreement. All this in the face of almost inexplicable national ridicule. He has remained steadfast in his refusal to part with the Rubio asset, and has generally come across as a calming, authoritative voice who explores all options and won’t be pushed around.

The difference between him and McHale is alarming. There is no comparison. That may be the most significant thing to come out of this stupid situation. Kahn, so far, despite a disappointing result, has been a fantastic ambassador and boss of the Timberwolves franchise.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 5:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Bad teams should always take the BPA. If the Wolves have the #1 pick in the 2010 draft and John Wall is by far the BPA, we take him. Kahn made the right call picking Rubio. If we trade Rubio, I don’t see it until the 2010 or 2011 draft.

by PoohRubio on Sep 1, 2009 7:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rubio

Hey guys, did you miss me?
So RR said playing for the Wolves would’ve been risky huh? Now why would he say that?
Better yet…why would he have Kahn fly over there, take care of the buyout and then say he doesn’t want to play for ya’ll?
I’ll tell you why…..like I said before….he doesn’t want to play for the Wolves.
Sad day for Minn!!!!!

by DaJoka on Sep 1, 2009 7:04 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

And yet the Knicks

still suck.

Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009

by PoorDick on Sep 1, 2009 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And...

They still don’t have Ricky Rubio.

by LoveTo on Sep 1, 2009 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nor will they if they don't give Kahn the value he wants back

That’s the reality Donnie Walsh will face trying to get Rubio in NYC.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Sep 1, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Several Thoughts

1. This is bad news- however you slice it. He’s not better off further playing against ACB, and Euro League competition that he’s been playing against for 4 years. The Wolves need him to be closer for development sake- so they have more say in developing skills and attributes for their system. If he lacks the mental toughness- he can’t take playing minutes- next year- it’s fair to question long-term value. This also hurts the team ticket wise. I know I’ll probably be less likely to make the drive to see Jonny Flynn and Chucky Atkins than Jonny Flynn and Ricky.

2. We can’t ignore Da Joka’s points. I question if Kahn really believes Ricky is coming ever. This seems to be indicated in the change of language from draft night. Where as on Draft Night (Ricky was the starting PG the second- he walked in) to he’s going to be behind Jonny in 2 years. I doubt Flynn’s summer league performance indicated such a change in tone.

3. Do we look to trade him? This depends on the offers presented. The reality is if we think he could be a Jason-Kidd type player- we’re not going to come close to getting anything resembling value. Wilson Chandler’s (Medicore), David Lee’s (A pretty nice player), Nate Robinson (A 5’8 Rhino). It’s possible Lee could be worth the 5th pick in the draft. WOW had him as the 9th best player in the NBA last year- factor in D he’s probably a Top 30 player in the league. Granted- The Wolves have no real use for David Lee.

4. This could very well be the worse day to be a T-Wolves fan since they lost in the WCF. We have a player that fans had been clamoring for a long-time (Choose to play further overseas after Kahn’s extensive efforts).

5. I’m mad at Ricky for jerking us around this way. SNP said it best “Who the hell does he think he is?”

6. I have a hard time disagreeing with Britt who sees this in a totally different way. I’m skeptical at best that Ricky is ever going to be in a Timberwolves uniform. Granted a lot of this is reading between the line of Kahn’s statements from Draft Night to today. I don’t tend to be overly negative as any regular poster from here can attest.

The only hope that this becomes a good thing is if Ricky becomes a more dominant scorer in the next 2 years (I just don’t see this happening in his game). So I tend to doubt he’ll really raise his trade value before ever stepping foot on a NBA Court from this off-season.

by Jose Cordoba on Sep 1, 2009 8:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Jose

He has not played against the high level of competition in the EuroLeague as Joventut has been eliminated early in those competitions. Last season was an excellent example as he only played in 5 EuroLeague games due to the wrist injury he had.

There is no way to slice it, other than saying simply that playing at Barcelona means he’s going to be playing against a higher level of competition than he did at Joventut just playing in the ACB.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Sep 1, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here is a look at Rubio's stats vs the EuroLeague and ACB

I suggest you look at them, and then tell me he can’t improve at Barcelona (a team that made the Final 4 last season).

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Sep 1, 2009 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ricky

has played at the Highest levels of International Competition. I tend to think the jump between the NBA and the ACB league is greater than the difference between different teams at ACB. His learning is better served here rather than another 2 years in Spain. He’s also better served adjusting to the more demanding NBA schedule and NBA game (Floor-Spacing).

by Jose Cordoba on Sep 1, 2009 9:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Again

I’m not trying to say Rubio will be a Knick. The only reason I even said that is because EVERYBODY KNOWS (including the bloggers here) Rubio and his ENTIRE TEAM (yes that includes Rubio) wanted to play and live in NY. Guess what….the Knicks didn’t get him. Oh well….to bad!!! That’s not our headache and we’re glad because the NY Media would’ve chewed Walsh a new one if he went through this and made the same (sorry) idiotic move that Kahn made. It’s always good to look at it in a positive light but Jose is 100% right. No matter how you spin this….this was a bad move by Kahn. Rubio showed absolutely NO INTEREST in going to Minny. Like I said before…..every other prospect in the lottery worked out for all the teams except Rubio. Kahn and his team had NO CONTACT with Rubio and his team. Why….again I ask…..WHY would you draft this kid? You’ve essentially wasted a draft pick, you lost 2 STARTERS and you added 18 million in payroll. You can’t be serious right now. Kahn goes to Spain not once….not twice….but three times (maybe 4) to try to negotiate a buyout for this kid. Once Kahn is able to work out the buyout by doing God knows what……what does Rubio do? LOL…OMG……this is the funniest part…..he says to Kahn….“hey thanks for all your hard work and showing me what you would do to bring me to Minny but I think I’m going to pass on your offer (after the agreed buyout) and stay in Spain to play ball…but I still want to come to the NBA.” How can you guys let that pass? Rubio said he wants to play ball in the NBA and it’s his “dream”. Kahn worked out the deal to allow Rubio to live his “dream” and Rubio says….“no thanks”
What does that tell you?
It means….Rubio doesn’t want to play on the Timberwolves.
That was my whole point from the very beginning.
Rubio can wait as long as he wants to before he comes over.
You won’t have his rights forever because Kahn will eventually be fired in my opinion.
All I’m doing is reading between the lines.
I’m didn’t come on here and try to disrespect anybody. All I was doing was looking for basketball conversation.
This is actually light though….you should check out what we say on the Knicks blog. You guys are like angels compared to us lol.
Anybody want to chat I’m here all night.

by DaJoka on Sep 1, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ok I'll bite I guess...

I just would really like to know what you would’ve done with the #5 pick if you were David Kahn? If you would honestly pass on a top 3 talent TWICE I would seriously question you’re basketball IQ and if you even mention a garbage trade involving Wilson Chandler I will immediately stop reading. Did some of Kahn’s statements about Rubio-Flynn make him look like a fool now? Possibly, but he would be getting ripped 10 times harder had he passed on Rubio.

How did we add $18 Mil in salary? We got all expirings for Miller and added $4.8 Mil in Songalia but had we used our option on Foye it would’ve been a similar amount so go and crunch the numbers again and explain to me how we add $18 Mil. And the “lose two starters” argument is so old and has been played out thousands of times. Neither guy was in our long term plans and blah blah blah…. I’ll spare the details and just say that no one in MN is losing sleep over Miller or Foye.

I will agree that it is questionable whether Ricky plays here or not and that Ricky essentially bitch slapped Kahn but to say that Kahn is idiotic for drafting him is just sad. If Kahn is forced to trade Rubio for nothing or Ricky decides to stay in Spain long term, I will give you all the credit in the world but the chances of that happening are about the same as the Knicks getting 2 max players next summer.

by jballer_13 on Sep 1, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Wolves

had to draft him. I’m unsure who they’d take with Flynn. What happens if Rubio becomes a Superstar if he slips to 7.

Listening to Kahn on with Danny B. I stand by my take that I’m skeptical that he plays for us ever.

Kahn spoke openly about Ricky’s trade value increasing in the next 2 years. This goes along with my earlier theory about Kahn changing his tune regarding Ricky being the starting point- the moment he walks in the door.

I rated Ricky number 1 in the draft. Once Sacramento passed on Ricky was the most exciting 5 minutes of my Wolves Fandom since 2004.

 For Ricky to do this to us-makes me mad as a fan. I get the sense- Kahn’s also furious at him for this. The pause when Danny B. asked him this question says it all.

by Jose Cordoba on Sep 1, 2009 10:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's the interview

http://www.kfan.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=KFAN_Barreiro.xml

You’ll see it third from the top, then it starts probably not quite halfway through in that link.

by museum on Sep 2, 2009 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I.....

would love to listen to that interview. You didn’t have to draft him Jose….you don’t just draft a player that also has a 6.6 million dollar buy out. You just don’t and can’t do that. Not to mention him losing 2 starters whose contracts expired after this year and adding all those millions in payroll. Kahn could’ve got a nice package for Foye and Miller…..a real nice package.
Now he’s stuck with nothing. Sure he has some cap room next year but are you really willing to bet a big time free agent comes to the Bucks? Especially with all those other teams that will have cap space next summer.
For the fans sake…I hope he’s right man.
His first move as GM could be the one that gets him fired in the end.

by DaJoka on Sep 1, 2009 10:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Shouldn't Rubio have to pay Timberwolves back???

I don’t understand how the Timberwolves or even the NBA let Rubio get away with this. If he had only a certain teams in mind to play for, then he shouldn’t have wasted their time or their #1 draft pick.

Good article here: http://www.spongereport.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=294:ricky-rubio-officially-a-bust&catid=51:nba&Itemid=78

Somehow, I wish there is a way to make Rubio pay the Timberwolves back for what he cost them.

Favorite Blogs:

www.spongereport.com
www.yardbarker.com
www.milehighreport.com
www.bleacherreport.com

by brohamm1978 on Sep 2, 2009 1:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't even know where to start with

this article. It is obvious that the author does not understand the CBA. As long as Rubio is under contract to play somewhere outside of the NBA, the wolves retain his rights. Once he isn’t under contract, the wolves just have to tender a qualified offer to retain his rights. he can’t go to another NBA team…unless the wolves make it happen. Having this type of control over a top flight talent has value.

by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 2, 2009 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.
Start posting about the Timberwolves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
All that has Kahn Before
Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Casper's 2010 Big Board and Mock Draft 3-08-2010

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cashing in the Chips?
Small
First overall pick scenario, what would you do?
Small
Unforgivable
The_dogs_small
It keeps getting stranger . . .
Small
Wolves fans NCAA Bracket
Small
"Assets"
Wile_e_coyote_small
Ellington developing nicely
Smiley_twitter_small
Hollinger's NCAA PER
Christinagivingthefinger2_small
Bracket reaction (prospect matchups):

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    EuroWatch

    Stats

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko

    Misc:

    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings

    SPONSORS

    SBNation.com Recent Stories

    Orlando Magic forward Rashard Lewis (9) shoots a three-point basket as Miami Heat forward Michael Beasley, left, defends in overtime during an NBA basketball game in Miami, Thursday, March 18, 2010. The Magic won 108-102. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

    Magic Lose Lead Late, But Win In OT On Lewis Three-Pointer

    University of Kentucky basketball coach John Calipari watches the NCAA tournament selection show with the team at his home Sunday, March 14, 2010 in Lexington, Ky. Kentucky was named the top seed in the East region of the NCAA tournament and will face E. Tennessee State Thursday in New Orleans. (AP Photo/Brian Bohannon) link

    The NCAA Tournament, Through An NBA Fan's Eyes

    Orlando Magic guard J.J. Redick (7) tries to get control of the ball as he is guarded by San Antonio Spurs guard Malik Hairston, left, guard Roger Mason, and center Ian Mahinmi (28), of France, during the second half of an NBA basketball game in Orlando, Fla., Wednesday, March 17, 2010. Orlando won 110-84. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

    Magic Rout Spurs 110-84

    More from SBNation.com >


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Img_2487_small Stop-n-Pop