Chris Sheridan- Ricky not coming till 2012
If Rubio plays three seasons for FC Barcelona, by the summer of 2012 he no longer would be bound by the terms of the NBA rookie scale, which apply to first-round picks only for the first three years after which they are drafted.
Rubio then could exercise his buyout (which remains the same in 2012 as it is in 2011: 1 million euros), come to America at age 21 and not be bound by the rookie scale. (Yes, there is a specific rule covering these situations. We've checked the details with the highest authorities and discovered a few caveats: Rubio's contract would have to be for a minimum of three years and a maximum of five, and the money that would be made available to him could be only from a team with salary-cap space or the midlevel exception, disabled exception or biannual exception.)
So let's say the Wolves are $8 million under the cap in the summer of 2012, they still hold Rubio's rights and Rubio has blossomed into an All-Star-caliber player.
Minnesota then could offer Rubio a five-year deal starting at $8 million with 8 percent annual raises (assuming CBA rules don't change), which would total out at $46.4 million and make him an unrestricted free agent at age 26. (Moreover, if Rubio had an opt out, he could become unrestricted at 25.)
In short, if Rubio comes in 2011, the rules say he can earn a maximum of $16.3 million in his first four seasons. If he comes in 2012, he won't be boxed into that rookie-scale deal.
This makes quite a bit of sense as he gets off the Rookie salary scale. Although it's hard to predict what exactly is going to happen with the CBA. I stand by my assertion that Ricky probably never puts on a T-Wolves Uniform. I tend to think Kahn thinks similar to as evidenced by the change of the tone from draft night to yesterday. The Evidence being with Danny B. Refering to "raising his trade value' and also the switch in "Ricky being the unquestioned 1 from the moment- he walks in the doors" where as now 'Ricky comes in behind Jonny in 2 years'
1 recs |
76 comments
Comments
I just read this too
Makes a lot of sense. Too much sense, especially given the ‘follow the money’ precedent Ricky just established for himself. If I’m Ricky and Fegan, I’m saying to myself (ourselves?), “Hey, we just saved ourselves $5 million by not paying a buyout, while someone’s willing to pay us at least $2.5 million to do so (over two years)! And on top of that, instead of netting only $10 million over the first four years of my rookie contract, if I sign for the $8 million Sheridan threw out there, I’ll make almost $12 million over the next four years by playing three in Barcelona and one in Mpls. Yay!”
The truth to this will be evidenced in inexplicable salary cap space for the 2012-13 season.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Sep 2, 2009 3:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
...or he just doesn't want to be in Minnesota at all
Ailene Voisin of the Sacramento Bee:
http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/sports/kings/archives/2009/09/the-wolves-bite.html
Conspiracy theorists can have at it, but I continue to hear that, until the last minute, Rubio was urging the Wolves to trade his rights to another NBA club, preferably the Kings or the New York Knicks because he had no interest in joining a team that drafted another point guard (Jonny Flynn). The discussion will be ongoing …
by wayno on Sep 3, 2009 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yet...
The Kings drafted Evans…who they will likely have play point….makes no sense. For the record, if the only sources that are spreading the rumor…happen to have Rubio going to their hometown team…just disregard.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Evans will eventually play SG. Martin moves to SF or is traded.
by wayno on Sep 3, 2009 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He may play spot SG
ironically, much like Kahn indicated for Flynn (LOL). Why would Rubio want to be in Sactown? The Twin Cities is a larger metro area. Plus, if it comes down to whether…the Lakers or Heat would be his primary choices…not NY or Sac.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant
weather…not whether…whoops.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
martin at the 3? that’d be an absolute disaster. he doesn’t rebound well for his current position and gets pushed around when he’s guarding fellow 2 guards. moving him to the small forward screams “we don’t ever want to get a defensive stop, ever.”
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 3, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They also have Nocioni and Garcia locked into long term contracts. That’s why I think he could get traded.
by wayno on Sep 4, 2009 2:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i’ve been impressed by evans’ play this summer, but i think it’s a bit early to say that a player who was mediocre in college is going to force a really good nba player onto the trading block before he’s played in a single nba game.
that said, evans is making my pre-draft thoughts on him seem silly already, so who knows?
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 4, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could have just drafted him for Heaven's sake.
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
by Auswolf on Sep 3, 2009 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Petrie doesn’t believe Rubio is a franchise player
by wayno on Sep 3, 2009 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then they wouldn't give up enough
to the wolves to get him…no point in even discussing the rumor. I admit your post said nothing about an actual trade occuring…just that he requested it…but I just don’t know why he would.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the problem is by doing so Ricky takes what little credibility he has left, which is almost none, and it starts to become like TO in football a liability. No one wants to give big money to man who is a known liar and fraud, who isn’t concerned about being a team guy. It is selfish, furthering what I felt, if he did not come over this year he never would. I for one would never trust a selfish person to run any team. Look at history for this. This is my opinion I know, but at least to this blockhead your word still means something
by remiel6 on Sep 2, 2009 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When you're great at what you do
people put up with endless amounts of your bullsh*t. I’ve seen it again and again. I would prefer that Ricky be an honest and square dealer, but we shall see and I don’t think him trying to make more money by waiting yet another year will seriously damage his reputation. Bummer, really. I still hope he comes in 2011.
by littleboxes on Sep 2, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he comes for the rookie scale
he can be traded anywhere or sign with us (ho ho) because signing a draftee to the scale is permitted when your over the cap
but
if he wanted to abandon the scale he needs a team with cap room. Could he then be S&T’d to get around this?
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
by Auswolf on Sep 2, 2009 3:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's good news - for the Blazers and Spurs :)
I knew that section, but until now it wasn’t really clear if teams can use exceptions to do that. Article VIII Section 2 of the CBA only talks about “room in excess of the rookie scale”. If experts confirm that would be the case, it gives more options to bring over established European players like Tiago Splitter (Spurs) next year and Joel Freeland and Victor Claver (Blazers) in a few.
There's Gotta Be More To Life
by Norsktroll on Sep 2, 2009 3:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess it makes it easier
when you draft them at 18 of course….
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
by Auswolf on Sep 2, 2009 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What’s the deal with Freeland btw? Is he supposed to be coming over anytime soon, and are you guys expecting much from him?
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.
by Xand1 on Sep 3, 2009 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
my understanding was that he barely knew how to play basketball when he was drafted and was so raw that it was going to take at least a few years to get him nba ready, anyway. i haven’t heard how he’s progressed since draft day or any other news about him for that matter. that can’t be a good sign.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 3, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's doing well
Played his way into a new contract over in Spain. Apparently KP went to Spain to discuss bringing him over and he wanted to stay there for a few more years (sound familiar?). Was a ridiculously efficient offensive player last year (25 PER) but in limited minutes (17 per game). Should be a useful low post player for the Blazers in a couple of years when he comes over. I believe the contract is for 5 years but has low buyouts so he can come over whenever.
by MadBlaze on Sep 4, 2009 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s good news for you guys. thanks for the update.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 4, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel obligated to point out
that should a lockout occur in 2011 and the salary cap be negotiated lower as well as lowering the Max deal level per player, it will only hurt him. The way the rules are written is that after 3 years we have the option of giving him a larger contract provided that it still fits under the signing year’s cap number. That deal must be for 3-5 years and can include the standard raises and bonuses allowed by the CBA for other contracts. Regardless, we still hold his rights and he can’t get more than we can offer him.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 2, 2009 4:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Two things
I just read through the relevant portions of the CBA, and I have no idea where this is coming from. If that were the case, we would see first rounder foreigners coming over and only having to play on the scale for a year or two (if they delayed their arrival) and then looking for new contracts. Additionally, why haven’t we heard about this vis a vis Fran Vazquez before? Also, why hasn’t any other player on a foreign team tried this trick? I think it’s dubious to assume that Fegan and Rubio just stumbled onto a procedural trick that will get them a new contract, which is the implication of Sheridan’s article.
Second, it is 100% pointless to speculate about Rubio’s future past this CBA. Remember, prior to the economic meltdown, the NBA’s #1 concern was how to stay the unquestioned leader in world basketball and how to prevent players (Josh Childress, for example) from gaming the system. I maintain that the rules regarding foreign players and non-NBA teams is going to be substantially expanded and altered.
by McCleak on Sep 2, 2009 5:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps age is a factor in this clause being untried
how many Euros in their early 20’s are going to delay entering the NBA until they are 24-25+ to exercise this clause? Rubio using this option at 21 is unique.
And many are second round picks in any event, so the clause is irrelevant.
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
by Auswolf on Sep 2, 2009 8:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are on to something...
.. otherwise Pekovic would have never fallen to the second round.
by Rumblebee on Sep 2, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
... but not...
… the pre-existing relationships between international players and the NBA teams that drafted them, right? Does anyone think that Stern might be so heavy handed as to sanction new rules that would retroactively give a player in Rubio’s situation an escape clause?
by nextmove on Sep 2, 2009 6:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No
I don’t think there will be any retroactive provisions.
Timberwolves - NBA champs 2013!
(used with permission - Wolf in MO)
by frankenhoops on Sep 3, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is an interesting point
Never knew this. If I were Rubio, I’d probably wait until 2012. That might have been the case anyway with the lockout.
And I was dead set on not making Rubio “will he or won’t he?” arguments, but I feel like the two pieces you sighted as evidence of Kahn jumping on the “we’ll never get him” boat are a bit weak. I’m going on memory here, but the talk about his trade value was in response to Barreiro bringing it up, and his saying Rubio might not be the #1 PG in two years, I mean, isn’t that just stating the obvious? What else would he say? And I’m as pro-Rubio as anyone on here, as optimistic about him playing here as anyone, but if Flynn is special, I’d trade Blonde Ricky in a heartbeat. Therefore his trade value is a legit thing to think about no matter where you stand on the issue. I don’t know, I’ve yet to be swayed by any points thrown out by the people who don’t think he’s coming. You can construct the events into a narrative to fit that angle, but you can do it just as easily to say that he will come (assuming Flynn isn’t Chris Paul), so I’m going on what’s been said in public and an instinct. He’ll be here when he’s ready in 2 or 3 years, if there’s a spot for him. And with that I will say no more until 2011.
by museum on Sep 2, 2009 7:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Rubio
Can somebody please explain to me why Rubio didn’t go to the Wolves this year?
Can somebody please explain to me why the fans of Minny still want this kid after he spit in the organizations face?
Thank you in advance.
by DaJoka on Sep 2, 2009 7:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
1. Depends who you ask
2. Depends who you ask
You’re welcome. I can’t believe you’re still here. Are you going through a “I’m not going outside because of a rough breakup and I’m depressed” phase? I hope there’s a reason.
by museum on Sep 2, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LMAO
Believe it buddy….I’ll be here all year because believe it or not…this is actually a great blog and the fans of Minny are smart and knowledgeable. I love having good basketball conversations.
by DaJoka on Sep 2, 2009 7:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A very nice sentiment. Unfortunately for your love of good conversation, people around here don’t have much love for people from NY who think/thought that trading him to the Knicks was somehow a good idea or a necessity for us. That opinion won’t get you as far as you otherwise might go on this blog.
by museum on Sep 2, 2009 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh gee....
And everyone ripped on me for trying to tell you guys that Rubio staying in Spain might not be the “Best Available Option.”
Gee.
by College Wolf on Sep 2, 2009 8:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Take heart, brother
Even though things played out in an unforeseen way that wasn’t being discussed, I still think you were wrong.
by museum on Sep 2, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even though I didn't mention it...
at least I didn’t just “assume” that everything would be all “rosey-posey” two years from now and that Rubio would magically join us. That’s all I was saying.
by College Wolf on Sep 2, 2009 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's one to ponder and potentially drive all of us nuts -
Don’t forget, contracts are made to be broken! Joventut just renegotiated the buyout. Who’s to say a year from now Barcelona won’t renegotiate a higher buyout and let Rubio leave after a year. Here’s why it may happen – Rubio has a great year, his perceived value and confidence increases, so he believes he will succeed in the NBA (increasing his belief the contract options will be picked up). The buyout could be raised to an amount that is a break even for Rubio within the first two seasons. Becomes even more likely if Flynn struggles and Rubio believes he will be instant starter.
by Rumblebee on Sep 2, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you’re saying that none of us can see the future and thus we have zero idea how this will play out??? Shenanigans!
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.
by Xand1 on Sep 3, 2009 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you'd have trouble proving
That even most people on this site ripped on you.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 2, 2009 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How so?
Almost every response to me was hostile. Maybe not overly hostile, but my comment wasn’t very well received…
by College Wolf on Sep 2, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your making a common mistake...
.. noticing the negative comments toward you. For every negative comment there were probably a hundred readers who did not comment, probably agreed with you or did not want to join the battle. I have read many of your comments and believe I have only responded to a couple, think I even agreed with one (must have been late on a Friday or Saturday night)!
by Rumblebee on Sep 2, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was Ricky spitting in our face
It very well could go down as worse than Starbury. After yesterday- I have very little confidence going off of Kahn’s tone that Rubio ever plays for us.
by Jose Cordoba on Sep 2, 2009 10:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really believe Rubio's fate is now
going to be determined by Jonny Flynn. Kahn even mentioned to Rubio there would be no guarantees in a couple of years and that Rubio would be two years behind Flynn.
It’s simple, Flynn plays well, Rubio gets traded. If Flynn shows he has the stuff to be a top-10 PG, I’ll gladly accept Rubio being traded in a package for a #1 SG or SF.
Flynn struggles, Rubio plays for the Wolves if he wants to be in the NBA (barring Wall getting drafted, ugh).
I still believe the Wolves get the best of both worlds (old and new in this case I guess).
by Rumblebee on Sep 2, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Always admire your takes Jose...
But I disagree here. I see an 18 year old kid that just removed significant financial stress and risk from his life. He makes a few mil $$$ the next two years, which means he can easily afford his buyout in 2011 (or 2012).
If he came this year and suffered a career ending injury (or just bombed as Will Avery 2.0), he and his parents are millions in debt with no recourse to pay it back. Throw in that he’s a momma’s boy, and I understand his decision.
It does make me wonder, however, if Ricky himself doesn’t think he’s the player we all think he is. If he end’s up being a superstar, this move costs him tens of millions of dollars over the course of his career.
"I'm gonna make you cry...I'm gonna make you cry and dip my cookie in your tears!!!"
by mutleyil on Sep 3, 2009 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with Jose
Assuming Kahn did successfully negotiate the buyout, the fact that Ricky asked to be traded to Barca is a kick in the balls to the Wolves. I understand the money issue, but wasn’t he saying that he would play for free? And as if he wasn’t going to get so many more sponsorship offers once he actually plays a game in the NBA.
After this, I’m really starting to doubt if he plays a game in a Wolves uniform which sucks because all I’ve done since he got drafted was drool over the prospect of him being here this year.
by easeus on Sep 3, 2009 2:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At some point the kool-aid drinkers....
Or should I say Kahn-aid drinkers. Now it’s going to be three years. Rubio & Fegan played Kahn for a fool. 90% of the basketball nation knows it, but somehow the abused T-Wolves fans tell everyone that they “don’t know Kahn like we do” and that “he’s actually a very competent GM when you get to know him”
Bottom line: they shouldn’t have drafted Rubio. Or, they should have planned that Rubio may fall in the draft (because of oh, I don’t know, perhaps an extremely complicated buyout) and ensure that Ricky would want to join the team if drafted. The NBA doesn’t have farm teams, Regal Barcelona is not triple A, anything could happen in 3 years. The move was Curry or DeRozan and bypass this whole mess we call summer of 2009
by Son of Gerald Green on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My God, your forceful language has opened a new chapter in my heart
I can only conclude that you know what you’re talking about, your use of Jonestown imagery is simply too poignant. Please tell me where I should go for breakfast this weekend.
by museum on Sep 3, 2009 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I were him
I would’ve done approximately the same thing. I’d like to think I would’ve been more straight up in my dealings with the team, but at 18, I doubt I would’ve been. He doesn’t owe us anything he can’t pay us back later, either by playing for us or as a trade asset.
by museum on Sep 3, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is some mediocre hindsight...
DeRozan is a project and Curry is yet another guard without a position. How do either of these picks make sense in comparison the valuable asset that we own in Rubio? Rubio, at worst, will bring a pretty penny in a trade (like a proven wing AND a good #1 pick). NY doesn’t have it to offer this year, but somebody WILL in the next year or two.
by nextmove on Sep 3, 2009 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus, now you can see how flynn looks before jumping on a trade like that. if flynn looks good, dealing rubio for a proven wing and a good first rounder doesn’t have the same sting that it would have without flynn around.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 3, 2009 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Issue
isn’t taking Rubio. This was the right pick (I’ll say this till the day I die). Rubio had the most upside of anyone left on the board. He was my favorite player heading into the draft. The problem was Rubio’s Primadonna attitude. He thought he had the right to jerk Kahn and the team around-with no consquences.
Curry wouldn’t have worked well with Flynn. Derozan doesn’t do a ton for me. The fundamental problem is that their weren’t that many really attractive options at this point.
by Jose Cordoba on Sep 2, 2009 11:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
Very few critics of the Wolves picking Rubio (and lo and behold, they’re coming out of the woodwork in the past few days—where was your prescience weeks ago, when David Kahn could have used it?) have offered up a tangible, realistic “here’s what they should have done instead”—even with the benefit of hindsight. Curry? Sure—just not special enough of a PG to pick with Flynn. Jordan? Child, please. The third-best big man in a bad draft full of point guards. DeRozan? I’d listen to that, but only if they were able to trade down to get him.
Kahn gambled and grabbed air, for now. Were there no uncertainty around Rubio’s contract status, it wouldn’t have even been an option for the Wolves. Better to have loved and lost . . . etc. And if the Wolves had been able to land Rubio and he became successful, several GMs would be wearing the Hawks and Chris Paul egg on their faces for passing on Blond Ricky.
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
by PoorDick on Sep 3, 2009 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed on most of that, but i really have a hard time seeing ricky as a primadonna. maybe i have more sympathy toward a 19 year old kid taking the money and not playing in the nba for next to nothing (in comparison to the barca deal). that buyout was a real issue. to call a kid out for not wanting to pay that kind of scratch to come to the nba seems like a bit of an overreaction.
he’ll come over when he doesn’t have to pay to do it. the 3 year rule makes it a savvy financial move to come out this year because now, after his buyout issues are resolved, he’s got the negotiation leverage when he heads to the nba. what rookie can say that? it’s hard for me to fault him for taking the money in spain.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 3, 2009 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Few More Points on Ricky
1. The issue isn’t the wait till 2011. The issue is the way the situation was handled. Rubio should have been clear of the financial issues- up front. These things should have been figured out earlier than Monday. The ulitmate issue is the way- Kahn was jerked around- not Ricky coming over right away.
2. He’s not going to be hurting financially- either way. He probably gets the biggest shoe deal in the rookie class because of marketing possibilities. He maybe even gets his own brand of Nike Rubio’s. This says nothing of other marketing possibilities for a kid with his image. I still tend to think he makes more in the NBA because of added endorsement revenue than in ACB league.
by Jose Cordoba on Sep 3, 2009 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
let's be honest about this
From all reports, there was a family lawyer involved and some other spanish league players who have played in the NBA who kept on pumping him information and “other options” as soon as Kahn and Fegan weren’t with Ricky. He is an 18 yr old kid. With that type of persuasion, plus the difference in short term financial positions…who wouldn’t do the same thing. He wasn’t upfront about it…likely because he didnt’ know himself. Now if in 2-3 years when he is getting ready to come over, if he starts playing games and demanding things, I will feel differently.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 4, 2009 6:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed?
Kahn played the situation as well as he could have been played? Kahn got played….so how did he play it well?
Once again I have to stress….how and why do you pick a player that does not want to play for you? On top of that…he has a very, very large buyout. No communication between the Wolves and Rubios camp and don’t sit here and tell me Kahn didn’t know Rubio wouldn’t report to Minny because it’s their job to know.
The fact is this…..Kahn gambled and loss. I think it’s so funny how before Rubio signed his new deal…..almost every Wolves fan just knew he was going to be in a Wolves uniform this year. They just knew that Rubio wanted to be part of their franchise. Now that he pretty much told Kahn to go screw himself….Wolves fans actually think they’ll see him in a uniform in 2 years!!
Rubio is not your average rookie who gets drafted. He wants to play in the NBA but he doesn’t need to. That’s the key…..he’s going to make millions regardless of where he plays. He’s young enough to stay in Spain for 10 years if he wanted to. Can Kahn make it that long? I feel G. Taylor should get involved. He doesn’t need his arena with less seats filled. With the backlash their organization is getting AROUND THE COUNTRY it will have a negative impact on his bottom line.
by DaJoka on Sep 3, 2009 12:43 AM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Actually
they knew he probably wouldn’t come this year. It doesn’t have anywhere near as much to do with the team as a lot of people think. Hard as that may be to believe. And you’ve been around here for a couple days now, you probably have a pretty good idea what a lot of us think about the backlash from AROUND THE COUNTRY.
by museum on Sep 3, 2009 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who cares about
the rest of the country? Do you do things just because random people on the street suggest it? Didn’t your dad ever tell you not to jump off a bridge because everyone else was doing it? The only people Taylor needs to give a crap about our MN fans and his bottom line. I for one, buy into the basic long term strategy to accumulating assets to increase the overall talent level…I think Rubio does that…even if he doesn’t play for us (ever). There is a reason you are not a GM.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can tell it’s the depths of the offseason by the fact that people are still arguing with this guy.
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.
by Xand1 on Sep 3, 2009 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I look forward to you stopping back
to commiserate when LeBron, DWade, Chris Bosh, and every other decent free agent laugh at the idea of playing for the Knicks.
Rooting for a Rubio Revolucion since roughly 10:20 a.m. on June 24th, 2009
by PoorDick on Sep 3, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been thinking about the point Sheridan makes
and I’m not entirely sure it matters in the real world. My understanding of the rule he cites is that a team CAN pay such a player over rookie scale, but can also sign him to a rookie scale deal.
Now, it’s not entirely clear to me where the leverage will be in 3 years. Right now, it stings. The Wovles needed Rubio to create excitement and sell some tickets in the short term, and I still believe that it would have been vastly better to have him now for development purposes.
But in 3 years, I think the public pressure will be different on the front office. We will have moved on, the roster will be entirely different, there will be new young players, and it’s not obvious that Rubio will be seen as central to the project as he is now. If Kahn sticks to his plan, adds some real pieces between now and the start of 2010-2011, we might not be pining for Rubio as much as we are now.
Of course, if the team is still stumbling along at 25 wins a year in 3 years, then there are serious problems, but if they get better, Rubio might not have the leverage Sheridan is assuming here. If he wants to play in the NBA, it might have to be for the scale, even in 2012. Now, he has some leverage too—stay with Barca; but it might not seem like such a disaster then as it does now. Yes, the Magic lost out on Fran Vazquez, but, well, weren’t they in the Finals a few months ago?
I still think it was more than just a math problem—I think he didn’t really want to play for the Wolves. Whether that remains true in coming years is still to be seen. But I’m adamant about not trading his rights. I’m not a huge fan of drafts, but we have rules, and the Wolves cannot let themselves get pushed around. They do have leverage in this situation,and they can’t let themselves get forced into a deal that doesn’t help them. If he winds up playing 6 years in Spain, well, that’s the way it goes.
by Eric in Madison on Sep 3, 2009 8:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree 100% that they shouldn’t trade his rights, at least not unless a home run offer is made (something I don’t see happening). And it’s also a great point that we have no idea how the future will unfold. For all we know, we actually get lucky next year and wind up with the #1 pick and John Wall, a Rose-level athletic freak of a PG who would most likely make us forget all about Mr. Rubio. All of the sudden we have all the leverage and are loaded to the gills with assets. Point is, it’s not worth getting too worked up right now. Gotta let things play out.
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.
by Xand1 on Sep 3, 2009 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s also difficult to see a scenario where a NBA team (given the current rules and cap environment) is willing to commit five years and $46 million to a 21-year-old who has never played a NBA game — he’d be making a couple of million more per year than the #1 pick and you’d be committed to him for a longer period of time. Rubio is going to have to develop one heck of an offensive game over the next three years to make that a viable scenario. To sign him to that sort of deal, you’re going to have to be convinced that Rubio is an All-Star caliber player from the day he signs his name on the line.
by SeanTO on Sep 3, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the most he can hope for is
a 3 year 5-6 mil per in order to prove himself in the NBA. Not sure how you would structure this to make sure you retain his RA rights. But that way he gets more than rookie salary, but less than the above deal. It makes it much more comparable to his Barca deal and more likely to come over so he can play 3 years and then try for a max deal.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he did stay over a third year to gain this advantage
it’s hard to see him settling for rookie scale cash.
by museum on Sep 3, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see a problem with Kahn committing to Flynn
That’s exactly what he should do at this point. If both were coming in at the same time, you would give Rubio the edge — he was drafted first and has a better resume. Now that Rubio isn’t going to be here for at least two years, it’s perfectly fine for Kahn to say that Flynn is the presumptive #1 until proven otherwise.
by SeanTO on Sep 3, 2009 10:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Enough already
Rubio is an 18-year-old kid who decided to play for a good European team for a couple more years. This makes his family happy, and makes his life a lot easier financially. There is no mystery here. Kahn said it all in his press conference after Rubio made his decision.
We are just going to have to wait a couple years. In the meantime, having Flynn as the Wolves starting PG will hasten his development, while having Rubio as Barcelona’s starting PG will continue his development as well. We are in no hurry. The guy who got hurt in this whole deal is not Kahn, it’s Taylor. Wolves tickets will continue to be very cheap in the next couple of years.
by Dave T on Sep 3, 2009 11:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just thought everyone should know
That the Pioneer Press just came out with a good story about the Rubio buyout.
href=“http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_13256102?source=rss” >
It adds some facts (hopefully) to what actually happened in Spain.
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 3, 2009 11:42 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Good work! "rec" and "rec"
Excellent article. I agree with DaJoka in one respect. This is an excellent blog. I thought BlogaBull was good but the level of basketball knowledge here is really high. I have also been all over the place with Rubio but have come to the conclusion that Kahn took a reasonable risk. So far it failed. It is similar to when we traded Elton Brand for Tyson Chandler. It was a risk shooting for the moon and failed. I still think it was worth the try. It is a pleasure reading the posts here!
by chgobr on Sep 3, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sympathetic treatment.
Thanks for the link.
by TheH on Sep 3, 2009 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I thought the article was excellent. Once I read it, it furthered my thought that Rubio is being influenced by a lot of people. If Kahn plays the loyalty card here well, like he has. I think Rubio will feel obligated to a)come over in 2 years b) do it at the guaranteed money amount. I think in a year, hell in six months he might regret his decision to not come and resent those who advised him to not follow his dream. I don’t know though only time can tell this. Does anyone know when the Spanish league season ends? Wondering what the chances are he finishes in spain and signs with the wolves at the end of next year then finishes the season with the wolves.
by remiel6 on Sep 3, 2009 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The one historical precedent to latch onto here...
Peja Stojakovic. The Kings (a team coming off a playoff berth at the time) drafted him #14 in ‘96, passing on Steve Nash and Jermaine O’Neal. They spent the next two seasons in no-man’s land and lost their second-best player (Brian Grant) for nothing to Portland. Stojakovic came over at 21 and started 12 games in his first two seasons because he was on a good team and couldn’t beat out Corliss Williamson. He didn’t become a full-time starter until 4 years after he was drafted and had some very good years in his prime for the Kings. Here’s my point: the Kings didn’t need him to become a playoff team and he was able to come in to an up-and-coming team and take them to the next level.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Sep 7, 2009 11:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













