Sessions' year-by-year MIN breakdown:
$3,670,667 in '09-10
$3,964,320 in '10-11
$4,257,973 in '11-12
$4,551,626 (player option) in '12-13
over 2 years ago
wyn
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Looks like they gave Sessions everything they had
That is, from the MLE after Hollins got some of it.
www.canishoopus.com
I wonder if Milwaukee
will be tempted to match that. Cost them $2m in lux tax but they have had such a dreadful offseason that this would be a line in the sand. An expensive line, but a line none the less.
Or they could try for a S&T.
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
The Bucks have said many times
that they’re not going to be above the luxury tax this coming year.
However, that doesn’t mean they won’t match. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Milwaukee is about $1.6 million below the luxury tax level of $69.92 million and is not expected to match the Timberwolves’ offer, although Hammond wasn’t tipping his hand on Friday.
“We have seven days in which to make our decision,” Hammond said. “We’ll explore all our options within that time period.”
Hammond has repeatedly said the Bucks will not exceed the tax level for the 2009-’10 season, and he expects to have considerably greater financial flexibility next summer due to a number of expiring contracts.
Hammond’s plan during the current offseason was to acquire players on expiring or low-cost deals, and he did that with veteran Kurt Thomas, 27-year-old power forward Hakim Warrick and 27-year-old small forward Carlos Delfino.
If the Bucks are intent on keeping Sessions, however, they could trade an existing player or make a deal that would net them about $2 million in savings. That could allow them to match Sessions’ first-year salary, which is estimated to be around $3.5 million.
So...
Who would be a good sign and trade?
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Sep 5, 2009 9:04 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
I can't think of one
that wouldn’t result in us giving up our FA run next off season.
If you were Milwaukee’s GM, wouldn’t you be trying to unload Gadzuric or Bell’s contract onto us?
Like Sessions and Bell for Cardinal.
If it got to that you may well have to say “keep him and pay the tax”.
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
You can't do a sign-and-trade to a team where a player signs an offer sheet
When Sessions signed the OS with the Wolves, it prevented him from being traded to the team for one calendar year if Milwaukee matches.
OK, thanks for the info.
Panic stations turned into happy land after we beat an inferior opposition like God wants us to.
You gotta love it when 10 minutes into the match you turn to the Hawk supporter next to you and say: "What the hell were we worried about all week?"
GOLDEN GOD BIRDS --- >>>> PREMIERSHIP HEROES ---- >>>>> BROWN AND GOLD ARMY OF TOUGH WARRIOR MEN ----- >>>>> 4 LIFE
by Auswolf on Sep 5, 2009 10:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
















