Kahn won't trade Al Jefferson, unless....
..."someone calls up with a deal that’s so preposterously one-sided, we'd have to do it." - David Kahn
about 1 month ago
nja700
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Really? “Fairly lopsided” wouldn’t cut it?
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Jan 27, 2010 12:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
notice how he didn't list specific types of players
Lopsided is a subjective term. If someone threw out a deal that would make our team at least as talented and more balanced…then I think he would. Not quite sure what would qualify, but I think the odds are pretty low that anything would happen until this offseason.
by TheEvilProfessor on Jan 27, 2010 8:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know
Yet again, it’s difficult to know when the guy is posturing and when he’s nuts. He shares a lot but also seems to take a really hard stance on a lot of things. I give him the benefit of the doubt so far, since he’s got a long-term plan in place and it’ll take a while before it all comes to fruition. Until he starts making major changes and shifts into another gear, I’m withholding my judgment. That’ll be the point when we know his true colors.
by nja700 on Jan 27, 2010 8:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta love lawyers.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Jan 27, 2010 9:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He thinks Love is currently the center piece of his team. Unless you get back a player who is a better center piece you don't do the trade.
I’m guess that’s Khan’s thinking.
So deals that move the team laterally and down… like the Noah deals etc wouldn’t cut it.
Plus remember good big men are the hardest thing to find in the NBA. So you don’t give one up unless you get one back who is better or you get great great talent….
my thoughts..
by Kevin Love Jefferson on Jan 27, 2010 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs













