Random thought wrap-up
Do you know what's really amazing? It's been 12 years now since the Bulls crazed-out intro has meant anything. At some time they have to retire that, right? In the name of karma it almost has to be done. If this site ever gets down to running Simmons-esque calls for me to be hired as an NBA GM, I want the Bulls job. I think I might even do away with the intro before VDN.
Moving on to the game, this is one of those tilts where you really had to feel good about the Wolves' chances, especially when the Big Piranha opened up the scoring with a left-handed hook from the right block, with the glove no less. The Bulls immediately tried to push the tempo on the Wolves, who were on the trailing end of a back-to-back, but they quickly found out that Our Beloved Puppies had their legs underneath them and that Big Al and Kevin Love can run the floor better than it would first seem.
Speaking of Mr. Love, his first time out of the game showed just how valuable he is to the offense. This has been a trend all season long. Love currently boasts a team high +8.14 points/100 possessions compared to when he is off the court. His closest teammate is Al Jefferson at +4.49. Tonight clearly wasn't his best game but it is yet another example of the fact that he is the straw that stirs the drink for the Wolves.
Wayne Ellington can really run a nice pick and roll. He had two nice plays in the Indy game and he came right out tonight with a fantastic play with Ryan Gomes in the first quarter. His ability to run plays, rebound, and defend have really made him a nice option over the past 10 games. The only big problem I see with him right now is that he doesn't appear to know exactly when he should shoot the ball. He needs to become this team's fisherman: a master of the catch and release. When he comes off the pick, he will often take one or two many dribbles which takes him too far into traffic instead of curling around the pick and immediately pulling the trigger. What is really interesting about this point is that Corey Brewer seems to be a master of the quick jumper off of a pick...he just can't seem to make them. If only there were a way to combine the two players in some sort of crazy science experiment.
One of the biggest items I picked at over and over and over again last season after Big Al's injury was the idea that the big problem the Wolves had were not the loss of Big Al's minutes to Kevin Love, but the loss of Kevin Love's minutes to Mark Madsen, Brian Cardinal, Craig Smith, and Shelden Williams (and yes, that was the Wolves' front court last season). This year, the Wolves' single biggest rotational issue (and one that I have harped on before) is the time when Kevin Love and Al Jefferson are both on the bench. In the past two games this nasty little scenario has led to two significant runs. Tonight, both players left the court in the 2nd quarter and were replaced by Ryan Gomes and Nate Jawai. The Big Aussie ended his short 1st half no-Love/Jefferson stint with a +3 while surprising the Bulls with his nimbleness and soft hands. He posted a similar +4 number in the 34d quarter. That +7 number was a magical gift for the Wolves and it went to waste with a bad 2nd half.
I have seen it written in a few places where Kurt Rambis has encouraged Kevin Love to stay away from shooting a ton of threes. I have no idea why this is the case. The guy can make that shot. In the 2nd quarter Love had a wide open look from straight away with time running out on the clock and he passed it to Wayne Ellington who was forced to take the worst shot in all of basketball: a contested jumper from just inside the three point line. Take. That. Shot.
Let's take another stab at the Jonny Flynn issue. Flynn was arguably the best player on the court in the first half: disrupting passing lanes on d, getting into the lane, scoring at will, etc. However, in the 2 half he reverted to Bad Jonny and he proved, once again, that once the scoring goes away, Flynn doesn't really bring anything else to the court.
This raises an uncomfortable question: If you really believe that Ricky Rubio is the business, then how on earth can you run him in this offense? If the position will be judged by passing off quickly and drifting to the corner, Ricky Rubio is not your man. If the position will be weighed by how well it scores on any given night, Ricky Rubio is not your man. How do you think this sort of play goes over with Rubio's agent? Hey Ricky, come be a part of an offense that will do its very best to negate your greatest strengths!!! This question is almost as uncomfortable as the central Al Jefferson/Kevin Love dilemma: How much will the team give Love if he is better than Big Al?
Getting back to Flynn, I'll say what I have said over and over and over and over: 6 foot star guards are a very rare breed and if you are going to have one on your team, unless he is an otherworldly talent (see Iverson, Allen) he has to be able to create for others (see Thomas, Isiah and Paul, Chris). This is simply not happening right now. Flynn drives to get his own, he dribbles and dribbles and dribbles in one spot without doing anything, he drifts to the corner where no one expects him to cut again or get a kick out...you get the picture.
When his shot is going, things are fine and his scoring punch somewhat makes up for the Wolves' general lack of proficient perimeter play. When the shot isn't going, the team is a train wreck. The best example of the night came when Flynn disrupted a beautiful kick around the perimeter that should have ended up in the hands of Oleksiy Pecherov for an open three. Instead of making the one additional pass, Flynn dribbled into traffic, killing the spacing and causing the Wolves to walk away from a possession with a shot that had less chance of going in than an uncontested three and zero points. Flynn has to start showing an ability to do something other than score when he is on the court. He has a very high ceiling as a scorer (amazing speed and handle to go along with serviceable shot and decent outside shooting) but he has showed next to nothing in terms of being able to facilitate an offense. That's problematic. This team has sunk a boat load of assets into the point guard position. They have to walk away from it all with an above average play maker, not an above average 6 foot scoring guard. Take a moment or two to think about what David Kahn said about Flynn vis-a-vis Stephen Curry. Now think about how well Curry would play in the role of drifting to the corner or being the point guard in a system that was previously headed up by guys like Derek Fisher and BJ Armstrong. This isn't so much crying about spilled milk as it is my first question about the new front office's ability to properly select personnel that fit its system. I think it's becoming fairly likely that Curry is more of a triangle point guard than Flynn and that Flynn is more of an NBA scorer than Curry. The problem isn't that one player is better than the other, it's that the front office had their roles criss-crossed. If only they had taken the Stop-n-Pop Drafting Golden Rule seriously: When in doubt, go with the taller guy who can shoot. (BTW: I think both will be good pros. Sometimes it's just a question of fit.)
Over the last 4 weeks the Wolves have been getting to the line like a bunch of demons. They rank 2nd to only Denver in FTAs over that period with 29.21/game. Thank you Kevin Love. Again, thank you Kevin Love. Last night the Wolves only managed 24 FTAs. At several points during the contest their offense simply stopped attacking the lane and settled for long range jumpers. The Wolves are not the type of team that can afford to stop the ball movement and attacking the paint. Part of this problem was having to go with a lineup that relied heavily on Pecherov (nearly 10 minutes) and Pavlovic (nearly 24 minutes) but it was occurring with the starters in there as well.
Love and Big Al were thoroughly outplayed tonight.
Aaron Gray missed two ridiculous bunnies in the last 2 minutes of the game.
On a night where the Wolves fell to the Bulls, the Wild showed the ballers what they are going up against for the Minny winter audience by coming back from 4 goals down against Chicago at the best arena in all of professional sports. In a state where high school hockey games are broadcast on TV and where you see more pick up hockey games than pick up basketball ones...well, the Wolves will have to be pretty damn good to compete with the product on the other end of town.
Well, that about does it for tonight. We'll see you later.
0 recs |
51 comments
|
Comments
before we hate on Flynn tooo much
I think we should remember that the great Mr. Love wasn’t all that great until about January last year (wasn’t he actually benched and didn’t really play at all for like a month?) and Flynn is at a harder position to learn than Love, especially in this offense. So I say we back off the hating a little bit until next year
by uofmike on Jan 9, 2010 10:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It's not how well he's playing...
….but how. That’s the problem. I’m all for giving guys time to develop into the type of player they are but I think the problem with Flynn is that he’s not really the type of player they were a) pitching him as and b) that would fit in the system their coach is trying to run.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 6:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If my memory is correct
Flynn was selected before the coach. I also believe Kahn was criticized for not having a coach in place before the draft.
If my memory is correct, perhaps Curry would have been the choice had Rambis already been on board.
by Rumblebee on Jan 10, 2010 4:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a total homer
and wanted Flynn on the team, so I have faith in his progress as time goes on, you just wait
by uofmike on Jan 10, 2010 9:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a large flaw in questioning Khan's ability to select people for the team's system
Namely, the Wolves had no coach and thus no system during the 2009 draft, so it was impossible for him to judge Curry and Flynn based on how well they would work the triangle.
by McCleak on Jan 9, 2010 11:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That was the problem with hiring a gm so late in the game
We can only assume it won’t be repeated in the next draft. And hopefully Flynn can pick up his passing game with time.
On another note, although Jawai’s hands might indeed be soft, I would never refer to them with a positive connotation. Any time a pass goes in his direction, I fully expect it to bounce directly off those hands. At this point, it’s a pleasant surprise when a pass to him doesn’t end up as a turnover.
Thanks for the recap and thoughts, though. This site is a boon for Wolves fans.
by Cody2k2 on Jan 9, 2010 11:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This was one angle...
….I was COMPLETELY wrong about. It really came back to bite the team in the ass and I don’t think there is a chance in hell Flynn is the guy if Rambis is there first.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 6:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In a way, though...
Curry might be a triangle-type player but not a Phil Jackson-esque player. Jackson’s philosophy has always been towards athleticism: biggest, fastest, quickest, longest, strongest. Then, the triangle is used to fit the personnel that gives them the best chance of winning defensively. Offensive players who can’t play D are rare with Jackson teams (Kukoc, Glen Rice). Maybe Flynn doesn’t fit that, but Curry definitely doesn’t.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jan 10, 2010 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Knowing little about the Triangle
I am wondering if it HAS to be the PG that goes to the corner??
by Rumblebee on Jan 10, 2010 4:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This isn’t so much crying about spilled milk as it is my first question about the new front office’s ability to properly select personnel that fit its system.
Perhaps the issue is they picked the players before the coach.
"I tell one of my media colleagues to watch Hollins, who regards cutters entering his vicinity with the sort of startled amazement newborn infants have when their own appendages enter their vision for the first times."
-Britt Robson
by Auswolf on Jan 9, 2010 11:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
agreed...
….as I mentioned above, I got that angle completely wrong at the time.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 6:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
More like
….Taylor spent six months watching McHale coach with no GM while he conducted what he himself described as a vanilla corporate head hunt for a new CEO, eventually winding up with Kahn conducting the draft when he hadn’t unpacked his second shorts-and-sandals outfit at Target Center.
The players-before-coach thing wouldn’t have happened without Taylor being asleep at the wheel from the moment he fired GM(cHale) until the regular season ended.
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 7:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
“In this picture Nathan Jawai blows sacred breath at joakim noah, whose head instantly shrinks/reverse-ages before our eyes in this extremely painful magical procedure.”
"Oooohhh, cat in the wall, eh? Now you're talkin' my language."
by TheMoon on Jan 9, 2010 11:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad you pointed that out. I didn't really notice the picture at first.
It does kind of look like Jawai is thinking “This dude is way faster than me, but he’s also very skinny. Maybe I can blow him off course.”
by John Doe on Jan 10, 2010 12:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A few things
Flynn’s passing ability in running situations leads me to think he can develop more precision in the half court set. Tonight wasn’t the first time he showed precision and timing when feeding a teammate on the break. Compare that to Sessions leading one of his teammates into a blocked shot on the break.
The bigger issue was the hit-or-miss Bulls getting a lot of uncontested looks. I don’t have a problem with giving Noah that two-handed push from the foul line, but they gotta get a hand in the face of Hinrich and Deng when they put it up.
I don’t want to become too staunch of a Flynn defender, but I’m more of the opinion that these evaluations are better off made when a player has played at least 2 1/2 seasons in the league, especially when the player in question is 20.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jan 9, 2010 11:56 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
As far as your last point...
…my response is that having watched Lawson and Jennings on League Pass, there are times in almost every one of their games where they show flashes of being an upper-level distributor. Having watched Flynn more than any other point in the league, there are times in almost every one of his games where he shows flashes of being an above average scorer. I think he’ll work out on the scoring front but I’m not so sure he’s ever really been a point guard; rather, just the guy who had the ball in his hands the most because he could score so much.
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 6:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't watch the game.
Can someone tell me why the starters (Love in particular) didn’t get big minutes? Were they being punished?
by John Doe on Jan 10, 2010 12:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
punishment/fatigue
Both Love and Al looked tired after the first quarter. Love and Al weren’t putting up much a fight out there, were it not for the poor quality of our bench, the move to sit those two may have actually improved the team’s chances of winning.
Love got his shot blocked three times. This alway seems to frustrate him. Dude needs to grow up, it happens, and get back on defense.
by littleboxes on Jan 10, 2010 1:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Bulls are not a good matchup for Love...
….and Jefferson’s defense was even worse than it usually is.
But ya, Love got really pushed around tonight by Gibson and Thomas. He looked tired, and got frustrated when his shots started getting blocked. And neither he or Jefferson played anything that could even be remotely called defense. Jefferson got lit up by freakin Noah, and Love had a game reminiscent of the preseason contest when Ty Thomas nearly fouled him out in 10 minutes flat and he let their length and athleticism get to him.
by Oceanary on Jan 10, 2010 2:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not by Gibson
IIRC Gibson produced primarily when Love was on the bench. I am pretty sure when Taj ‘made’ his first shot when Love was in it was that absurd off the top of the backboard thing. Gibson was better than our bench, but Love killed him.
'Because there are no fours.' Toine
by CaliWolf on Jan 10, 2010 2:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True...pushed around may not be the best word for Love/Gibson
I just remember the first 4 minutes or so when they started against each other, and it seemed like Love was just not doing anything. Gibson looked twice as interested and 10 times more active.
But ya….Love had way more problems with Ty Thomas than Gibson.
by Oceanary on Jan 10, 2010 2:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tyrus Thomas killed Love in preseason
In the game where Love broke his hand, Thomas went off for something like 22 and 13 in 25 minutes.
I just remember the first 4 minutes or so when they started against each other, and it seemed like Love was just not doing anything. Gibson looked twice as interested and 10 times more active.
I didn’t see the game, so am forced to check the gameflow about this. Wow, are your perceptions at odds with the numbers.
In the first 4:31 of last night, the Bulls were -8. Gibson was 0-3 with a foul and a single (offensive) board before being pulled.
Love was 2-3 from the floor, adding 2 made fouls shots and 4 boards, two of which were offensive.
What does it look like when Taj isn’t interested??
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 7:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A flailing fish
Also looks twice as interested and 10 times more active than one in the water.
by nja700 on Jan 10, 2010 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
New lineup?
Rambis postgame quotes suggest that he may shuffle the starting lineup in order to get a more effective second unit. Says that some players will need to sacrifice their starting positions.
Guesses? An interesting move would be to bring in Love and Flynn off the bench, as it would signal the end of the Love/Jefferson starting front court and would offer a preview of Jonny Sparkplug off the bench.
I’m skeptical there’s enough talent on this team to even contemplate two effective units.
by littleboxes on Jan 10, 2010 1:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I kind of want to see a lineup of Flynn/Ellington/Brewer/Love/Hollins. Let Big Al just destroy the second stringers with Ramon and Gomes. The main reason I want to see this is I want to know if Love can be one of the main facilitators on offense.
by Jaughn on Jan 10, 2010 2:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It'd be an interesting experiment...
….but I don’t think Rambis will send our best scorer and a player making $12 million to the bench. It’d hurt team morale now and Jefferson’s trade value for later.
by Oceanary on Jan 10, 2010 2:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That is true. I do wonder if a SF could effective as a shot blocker in the NBA. I have been watching Wes Johnson a lot and he is an outstanding weak side shot blocker. Would it be possible to get a really good man to man defender to defend the opposing team’s best wing and allow Wes Johnson to play sort of a free safety role?
by Jaughn on Jan 10, 2010 3:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It can be done.
I do wonder if a SF could effective as a shot blocker in the NBA.
Refer to: Garnett, Kevin, for a long long time at the start of his career.
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was too young to have a valid opinion about him then. I just remember him being so dominant. I barely remember him playing SF. I have heard some small comparisons of Ed Davis to KG, but I haven’t watched him play too much. I could only only hope that is true.
by Jaughn on Jan 10, 2010 11:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It worked...
But offensively it mostly worked when Googs was there and both of them were 3/4s offensively. When Joe Smith replaced Googs, it was less effective. They could’ve kept him there if they’d had more complementary personnel.
by pagingstanleyroberts on Jan 10, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Al may get just as many minutes
but the goal may be reducing the time Love and AL are on the court together. You may also see AL play more with Flynn and a few defenders. In that scenario most of the scoring will be driven by AL and Flynn while the defenders stand around and watch.
As to Al’s trade value, sadly I don’t think it will ever be much higher than it is now (as a Wolf anyway), or as high as it was a year ago. The current team and system overexpose Al’s weaknesses and they will probably have to package him with another player or picks to really get anything meaningful in return.
by Rumblebee on Jan 10, 2010 5:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is...
…the first move will be going back to having Gomes start at the 4 and bringing Love off the bench, simply because we’ve seen that work before.
I don’t think Flynn will go to the bench, mainly because he’s playing better than Ramon right now.
Another possibility might be Gomes at the 3, and either Wilkins or Ellington at the 2, but from what Rambis said and Zgoda blogged after the game, it sounds like the frontcourt is the part of the team that’s under fire right now.
by Oceanary on Jan 10, 2010 2:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gomes will not start at the 4
As I just said below, Love would be demoralized about that, and I don’t blame him.
Secondly, Gomes is an atrocious defensive 4. Look at his splits between SF and PF. Opposing PER:
SF: 11.3
PF: 18.1
C: 28.1
(Jr. High girl’s note to Rambis: Do you think Ryan Gomes as a big is cute? Please check one: NO.)
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 7:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just going by what happened last night...
….and what Rambis said after the game. The frontcourt was the problem last night, so it’d follow suit that the frontcourt would be what’s getting changed.
by Oceanary on Jan 10, 2010 4:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Make no mistake
If Love is removed from the starting lineup at this time, he will be a former Wolf soon. He has played too well to be benched, if he is it is a blatant sign that management does not see him as a future important piece of the puzzle.
by Rumblebee on Jan 10, 2010 5:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Love cannot come from the bench
That there would be a bad, bad morale move for young Kevin. It might make sense given the balance of talent on the roster, but I think you’d lose him.
Flynn as a dynamic scoring reserve PG makes lots of sense. Really if it wasn’t for Rambis being unbelievably patient and steady at the tiller, we’d already be there on almost any other team. Either way it’s still true that the tandem of the two points gives us nice ways to change gears in the course of a given game. I can understand that either way.
If Ellington wasn’t a rookie he’d very possibly be starting over Brewer already. Corey is a guy you toss into games to shake them up, and if he’s going to be useful it would be nice to have choices about when to do that.
Wilkins for Gomes would be a lot less meaningful than the two guard spots, and given the (questionable) option on Brewer the team now almost has to deal Gomes or waive him next offseason. If it was for the long haul on this roster, though, I’d start Ryan given that he’s actually (by the numbers) not been a terrible defensive three. (Now, at the PF? Bad defender.)
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 7:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd go...
Sessions/Ellington/Wilkins/Love/Jefferson
and
Flynn/Brewer/Gomes/Cardinal/Jawai
…maybe switch Gomes and Wilkins based on their 2 man numbers with Flynn (i.e. i haven’t looked at them yet).
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 8:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly so
How Flynn would respond to being benched and another rookie being elevated to start, I don’t know, but that lineup would run smoother for the starters. (Corey Brewer is a tall, rangy engine knock in our analogy, here.) The guards complement each other, Ellington represents some range for the inside boys to play off of, and like that.
Gomes and Wilkins are much of a muchness when Ryan is playing shooting forward, especially given that Gomes’s contract almost has to come off the books coming up here. Ryan’s defense at the three is respectable, so if it was me, he’d probably get the nod…. Though Wilkins too is willing to do work there. On the other hand that second unit can probably use a coach on the floor sort, so maybe Gomes there. (Shrug.)
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
by feral on Jan 10, 2010 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just posted above you before reading your post
I definitely agree Love’s morale would be destroyed if he is taken out of the starting lineup after what he has done this season.
by Rumblebee on Jan 10, 2010 5:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excel Center is nice...
but new Cowboy Stadium is the nicest arena in professional sports.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Jan 10, 2010 1:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
they do have stripper poles
Forever splitting the Cheechakos from the Sourdoughs
www.canishoopus.com
by Stop-n-Pop on Jan 10, 2010 6:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
tucker?
when will we see tucker play sasha’s minutes?
by abcnerdd on Jan 10, 2010 2:00 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Only Problem with Yesterday's Wolves
was their Best Player played in Barcelona.
by Jose Cordoba on Jan 10, 2010 1:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Think we should start fining him
for missing practices?
by Mplax on Jan 10, 2010 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's on!
The genie is out of the bottle, and how about this nugget (from the above article):
Minnesota also has chemistry issues between Jefferson and forward Kevin Love(notes). "There’s some jealous stuff that’s playing out," one league source said.
To state the obvious: The odds of Jefferson getting moved before the deadline just moved up significantly.
Not at all surprised the Pacers turned that deal down either. Should provide a reality check for all those thinking Jefferson is, or will yield, a superstar type talent.
by DougW on Jan 10, 2010 5:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Really? Surprising.
I was under the impression that Jefferson and Love were buddies. And in the games vs. GS and Indiana, I sat right behind the Wolves bench, and they seemed to get along fine, joking around at times and at other times talking strategy (or something).
And I’d think Jefferson would have to be packaged with another asset or two to get a superstar talent.
by LoveTo on Jan 10, 2010 7:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Al refers to Love as his son.
I don’t buy what “one league source” is saying. What would a non-Timberwolves source know about anything?
I also kind of have my doubts about this whole report. It seems silly to report such a thing. It’s an obvious offer to make on our part, and an easy no from Indiana. It just doesn’t seem newsworthy.
by John Doe on Jan 11, 2010 3:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Next Year
I know T-wovles fans get tired of waiting, but don’t the Wolves have a slug of high draft picks coming up? I think the team and fans need to be realistic. You can change this team’s lineup all you want, but with this current roster there is no way the team is going to do anything. The focus needs to stay on the future. Use this year to figure who is staying and who is going. It seems to me that as long as Jefferson and Love are considered/used as starting lineup players one of them has to go. The wolves need to bring in a legitimate center, someone who can defend the big guys and clog up the middle. I still can’t figure out why they got Love in that first round trade rather than drafting Brook Lopez right off the bat.
by vulcangw on Jan 16, 2010 6:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















