An interesting article goes through 5 picks from 2009, and with a little hindsight declares what should have been. Out of 5, 2 of the critiqued picks are by our beloves Wolves. Guess which ones... (Spoiler after the jump).
The whole article is here.
To summarize, he says we should have picked Curry after Rubio and have kept Lawson. Maybe take Flynn lower down. Really, is this what you would have wanted the team to do?
What should the Wolves really have done at the 2009 Draft?
Pick Flynn at #6, trade Lawson (11 votes)
Pick Curry at #6, trade Lawson (37 votes)
Pick Curry at #6, keep Flynn or Lawson (52 votes)
Something totally different (14 votes)
114 total votes