I don't want to say anything in defiance of the League's wishes that we stay quiet on collective bargaining. But I'll echo what the commissioner said at All-Star, there should be a more robust revenue-sharing program out of this agreement. I will say though, that having worked at Indiana for nine years, and now here, there's no question that he difference in broadcast markets has an impact on your revenues. I mean, that's just obvious. New York, L.A., Chicago, the Bay Area, they're in the top ten, and especially those first three, have the opportunity to drive revenues that simply don't exist for the rest of us. TV, radio, cable and even new media now ... ticket prices have always been a way for other markets to keep pace, but that's difficult to have that persist over a long period of time, whether there's an economic downturn or not. [In small markets] you ultimately have fewer consumers and have to keep raising prices to keep up.
David Kahn talks to Henry Abbott of TrueHoop about the Wolves' ticket strategy.
almost 2 years ago
wyn
1 comment
0 recs |
Comments
The players should drive a wedge right into these statements.
And once again we have a seeming Players-vs.-Owners sports negotiation that actually masks another, quite serious, fault line between owners in different markets. Revenue sharing is a point of dispute between small- and large-market owners.
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."

















