Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Canis Hoopus

Wanting more than cute

Jan 2012 by Stop-n-Pop - 450 comments

Dignity!

Jan 2012 by Stop-n-Pop - 414 comments

Unicorns exist!

Dec 2011 by Stop-n-Pop - 743 comments

Around SB Nation

Eguren's Future Up In the Air

Jan 2010 from Villarreal USA - 6 comments

News Items

Mar 2010 from Villarreal USA - 21 comments

Villarreal's Anniversary

Mar 2010 from Villarreal USA - 11 comments

Villarreal's Finances

Mar 2010 from Villarreal USA - 16 comments

A Green Touch of News

Mar 2010 from Villarreal USA - 30 comments

Comments

Display:

I am sure that we don’t think as much of Randolph as Golden State fans.

by mnlawyer on Jun 3, 2010 11:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, you have posters over there saying their hesitant to give up Randolph straight up for #4. Talk about delusional. Or maybe I’m delusional. Either way, I’m glad Kahn doesn’t have to negotiate with those fans.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t be shocked to eventually see Paul George as a legitimate prospect at #6.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

George/Randolph/Whiteside or Henry or Anderson?

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe Whiteside and Anderson if either falls to 23.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I heard Kahn was a GS fan...

Uh oh…

Check out my NBA Draft blog:
http://casperkid23.blogspot.com/

by Casperkid23 on Jun 4, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's McHale all over again!

The Timberwolves could be a farm system to whoever our GM’s favorite team is!

The Timberwolves: Where Stephen Curry doesn't happen :(

by BetterLaettnerThanRider on Jun 4, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eh, this move doesn't excite me

for #16 for sure though

"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin

by thewild_viking_twins on Jun 4, 2010 12:59 AM CDT reply actions  

If the Warriors trade Anthony Randolph for solely the 16th pick

I won’t say I’d stab myself, but I’d sure feel like it.

by madafromSF on Jun 4, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I would feel the same way if it was #4 straight up for Randolph which many people over at GSOM said they would be hesitant to do. Maybe the true value for AR is somewhere in between those extremes.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stab Nellie.

It’ll console all of us.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be satisfied

with just a little liposuction after someone posted the Nellie Belly pics last spring. Ewwww.

"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."
Mark Twain

by uncle rico on Jun 4, 2010 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Aren't Kahn and co. in Europe?

I question how serious the talks are if our whole front office is across the globe watching Pekovic and Rubio.

That said I’d love to get Randolph if he were reasonably priced.

by John Doe on Jun 4, 2010 2:02 AM CDT reply actions  

From the article itself

The discussions between the two clubs took place last week when several teams, including the Warriors, sent representatives to Minnesota to watch 42 potential draft picks work out at the Timberwolves’ practice facility.

Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009

by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 4, 2010 5:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

hehe thx; you started my day with a laugh :)

Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009

by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 5, 2010 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just having a quick read at GSoM

Sounds like the Dubs FO like Wes Johnson.

In which case:

1. They could likely stay put and still get him (if the Monroe to Sacto business is to be believed).

2. We draft him and then could still take one of Cousins or Aminu at 6. Aminu would make sense at 6 with Randolph on the books.

3. Does lead to quite a logjam in the big man department.

"I was trying to focus on breathing," Milicic said. "I was just focusing on breathing so I didn’t die."

by Auswolf on Jun 4, 2010 3:57 AM CDT reply actions  

it could

but couldn’t Randolph play the 3? what he lacks in quickness he may make up for in length. he’s a rail! he’s got some handles too… just a thought. in my mind, if we get randolph, we don’t need aminu. we should get a legit 2. george or henry would make me happy right now.

by nodnarb on Jun 4, 2010 6:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Supposedly he's gained 20 pounds of muscle.

Supposedly the Wolves are following his workouts, and know that.

Supposedly.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Randolph can’t play the wing. It’s been tried. It’s failed. Miserably.

He’s a legit 7 footer who is adding muscle every year. He’s a 4/5, not a 3/4.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

You could say the same thing about the minutes CJ Watson played at the 3. An absolute failure in a small sample size doesn’t make the obvious lack of necessary skills any less obvious.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 5, 2010 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't suprise me one bit

if Kahn’s real goal was to have a frontcourt of Cousins/Randolph/Love. There is size, shotblocking and rebounding ability. But I still have no idea who they could convert Al (if they are even planing too) into on the wing?

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Perfect

That is the front court I’d want if we’re looking at Randolph. He’s rangy, athletic and a great shot-blocker so he’d be a great fit out there with Cousins and Love. If we’re keeping love in that scenario, then I’d imagine we would have to move Al in order to constrct it, so what we do with him is probably moot.

We’d be weak on the wings for the immediate future, but that’s a front court you can move forward with. Also, if they do have any interest in Al, the deal would have to include someone to make salaries match so we’d presumably get a wing there. Then I’d try to keep 16 and 23 to go after some of those mid round prospects like James Anderson/George etc. Or try to nab a 1 on 1 creator/scorer like Jordan Crawford in the 2nd.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 4, 2010 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

when someone said that GS was high on

Wes and SAC likes Monroe, it just kind of popped into my head. A rotation of Love, Cousins and Randolph is pretty solid. The wolves would resign Darko for a short contract and let Cousins work to try to get the starting spot over next year. You give Darko somekind of Euro opt out if he is dissatisfied with his PT (continues the wolves practice of making sure they treat vets well) and lets Cousins and Randolph focus on playing soundly with no mind games. Let Love and Darko start for the year together.

Having this frontcourt should open a little more room in the paint for Jonny/Sessions. Ellington will get more burn at 2 this year which should improve Jonny’s drive and kicks with Randolph being athletic enough (with good enough hands) to throw down on interior big man passes better than Love and Al could.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like that frontcourt too

But we’d REALLY need a great shooting SG to make that work. Also, who/what are we hypothetically giving up for Randolph? The #4 is waaaaay too steep, and would preclude us getting Cousins.

by aarendsvark on Jun 4, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Darko/Randolph/Love works too

Add a premier SG and we are good to go. I’m looking forward to becoming a Steamer fan too.

by timmuggs on Jun 4, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

this is true

Admittedly, this does tremendously strengthen the wolves frontcourt and I can understand how Kahn might be willing to make this trade if he feels they can develop Randolph better than GS (which shouldn’t be hard given Nelly).

Would George be a target? I wouldn’t think it would be Aminu if we are getting Randolph.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

If that's gonna be his nickname

it’s a good thing Stiemsma doesn’t play for Cleveland

I looked ahead to the open road, thought about the people and what they know, and wrote a book called "People Don't Know Nothin!"

by Bahlgren1 on Jun 4, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

On the other hand,

there’s also a post over there to the effect that the deal wouldn’t go down until draft night, and would be triggered if the Wolves get (whoever) at #4 and the Warriors have Wes Johnson to take at #6. Minnesota would trade down for Johnson, picking up Randolph for so doing…. or sumpin’ like that.

Simultaneously multiple posters are saying the Warriors have Johnson third on their board. So.

(I’m just relieved to have the Wolves making some noise at their usual every-two-weeks-in-summertime pace. You have to water that field of wheat for it to grow, man. Regular like.)

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sacto's fans

are giddy at the prospect of drafting Wes at 5. They think he’s the perfect guy to put next to ‘Reke. I hate this draft – we get shafted out of getting Turner, and we can’t move down a couple spots and pick up Wes either. Unless we can figure out how to get #2 or 3 without giving up #4 there’s no way we’ll end up with Turner/Wes, Turner/Favors, Favors/Wes, etc.

"Styx might be the mullet of bands."

by biggity2bit on Jun 4, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

If nothing else...

it sounds like Kahn is exploring a lot of options, which is good to read and not at all surprising.

by Andy G on Jun 4, 2010 6:31 AM CDT reply actions  

Only real message we can take away.

He’s active, as usual.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

it’s funny how the fanbase has a pretty narrow list of possible scenarios — most of which involve trading up to Philly — and Kahn is probably on the phone with every GM not-named Kupchak or Ainge, these days. The guy knows how to make an exciting June, even if November through April leave a lot to be desired.

by Andy G on Jun 4, 2010 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

you know your a wolves fan when...

your offseason is more exciting than your regular season.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

No doubt

Or when Summer League games draw more Wolves fans than regular season games. The SL is like the apex of the Wolves’ fan year since we get to see all of the shiny new objects we just drafted. From then on out it’s a slow slide into depression that exists until the season ends. Then we perk up again for the lottery!

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

This year's Vegas roster is going to be amazing.

We know Flynn and Ellington will both be there, Hoiberg and Bickerstaff told us that. How many rookies do we add to that list?

Could be the summer juggernaut we’ve all been waiting on.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hopefully...

I’m making my maiden voyage to SL…should be fun to check-out.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Kahn has decided he's willing to take on Brand's contract...

Then maybe he can move down to #6, acquire Randolph, and then Trade #6 to Philly for #2 and Brand.

I might not be opposed to that.

Talking myself into DeMarcus Cousins since 5/18/10

by Blakeley on Jun 4, 2010 7:27 AM CDT reply actions  

What's the term for that?

Is it some sort of “boomerang” deal if you trade down and then back up?

Eh. Probably would happen as a three-way deal, so we wouldn’t see it that way. That would be the intermediate step in the reaction.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

POBO of the Year

before the season even starts if he can get that done.

by PoorDick on Jun 4, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Plus move Al Jeff to the Pistons for #7 and Tayshaun and draft the best wing available, or package 16 and 23 to move up to grab Xavier Henry.

by BVP on Jun 4, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Updated Depth Chart under said scenario

PG: (Rubio)/Flynn/Sessions
SG: Turner/Brewer
SF: Prince/AF Aminu/Brewer
PF/C Rotation: Love/Randolph/Pekovic/Brand

Talk about length! We could at one point trot out a lineup of Randolph/AF Aminu/Prince/Brewer/PG

Yowza!

Talking myself into DeMarcus Cousins since 5/18/10

by Blakeley on Jun 4, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Very

interested. He’s exactyl the type of 4 we actually need on this team – long, skilled, great on the break and capable of blocking shots.

It depends on what GSW wants, though. I wouldn’t move or swap out of #4, but would possibly entertain something around Love or Al.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 4, 2010 7:46 AM CDT reply actions  

Scenario

Love for Randolph
4 + 16 for Turner
Jefferson for Prince + 7
Prince + 7 for 5 + filler

Starting Lineup
Flynn (Rubio)
Turner
W. Johnson
Randolph
Darko

Bench
Sessions
Ellington
Brewer
Pekovic

I’d even throw the #23 in if necessary, otherwise draft and stash Seraphin for next year
I wouldn’t mind paying to watch that team play.

by fan44 on Jun 4, 2010 9:24 AM CDT reply actions  

That's

a bad rebounding team. I think you need to figure out how to keep Love for that reason.

"Styx might be the mullet of bands."

by biggity2bit on Jun 4, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

which makes me think

that even giving away our two current best players, there is no way we can build a roster without any holes. I believe that this offseason should be focused on building the most ideal/perfect team with one glaring hole. Then fix that hole next offseason.

by fan44 on Jun 4, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure that it's a bad rebounding team

Turner and Johnson will probably rebound better than average at the 2 and 3, and Randolph had the same rebounding rate as Al.

by PoorDick on Jun 4, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's terrible

Turner/Wes should be solid, if not above average at their positions and Randolph is pretty good. We wouldn’t have a beastly rebounder like Love, but we should be able to be solidly middle of the pack if not better. We’d be about 10000000x better defensively, which should easily offset it.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 4, 2010 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seraphin is pulling his name out of the Draft.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was because of that injury he sustained in the last couple of weeks.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

unless he felt that was going to cause him to go undrafted

what’s the problem? He was still going to go in the second round at least. he could play out his foreign contract while he got healthy and then sign for whatever he wanted to come over. Oh well.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was because he couldn’t do workouts. I think he may have wanted to come over this year.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

most of his interest though

was for teams that were willing to stash. That way they wouldn’t have to pay him next year and then there is a lockout. Asset at no cost for when the lockout ends.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ll find the link and post it, may have been on Hoops World.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you 100 percent sure on this?

I know Motiejaunas dropped out, but DX’s twitter reports that his agent says he’s wide open and that he’ll stay in if he finds a good team in the 1st that likes him. DX is pretty connected on foreign players, so I trust them quite a bit.

by nja700 on Jun 4, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think teams want to work him out before they draft him.

by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I just wanted to point out that even though it’s become more likely that he will drop out due to injury, it’s not a sure thing. It’d suck if the top 3 international prospects dropped out of this draft.

by nja700 on Jun 5, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too much

So we’re trading Jefferson, Love, #4, and #16 for Turner, Johnson, and Randolph?

It might be interesting, but it’s too much.

I have no problem with trading the 4 and 16 for Turner, but would you really trade Jefferson and Love, two very solid bigs, for Johnson and Randolph?

Would you trade Love straight up for Randolph? I probably wouldn’t.
Would you trade Jefferson straight up for Wes Johnson? I definitely wouldn’t

If you wouldn’t do these individually, then as a package it doesn’t make sense.

by Rosy02001 on Jun 4, 2010 9:54 AM CDT reply actions  

Yes

Even though Jefferson may have slightly more value than Johnson individually, Johnson is a perfect fit for our proposed running team AND Pekovic replaces 80% of what Jefferson can do.

Even though Love can throw some pretty mean outlet passes and rebound like a mofo, Randolph would be a better fit for the proposed style AND has a higher ceiling. He also has a lower floor than Love but at some point we are going to have to take on risk.

by fan44 on Jun 4, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

But

Love for Randolph is still a no go. You have to get better value than that.

by John Doe on Jun 4, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bleh

Randolph is all promise and not much production. That is, when he is not hurt.

Randolph is a PF, and Jefferson and Love are both better players IMO. Jefferson is a 20 & 10 guy who commands a double. Love is a better 2 point shooter, 3 point shooter, rebounder, passer, etc.

GS would have to offer more value. Trading Love and #4 for #6? No effing way.

I could see trading Jefferson for their pick and a contract. I think I read somewhere that Ellis and Jefferson are tight, and GS has publicly stated they want to add a good big man.

"It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." -- Yogi Berra

by Wile E Coyote on Jun 4, 2010 10:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Randolph has been pretty productive when healthy. He rebounds the ball well, is improving as passer and a scorer, though still needs to cut out some bad shots (18.5 per 36 at a .521 TS%), he makes his free throws (over 80%) and has been getting to the line more as his career progresses. If he could crash the boards as well as he did in year one, he’d already be a better than average player (dropped from 11.6 per 36 to 10.3)

Yeah, he’s promise heavy, production light, but the improvements he showed in nearly every area of the game at least give some hope that he might actually keep some of those promises.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

If I could turn Jefferson, the 4th pick, and smaller assets

Into Randolph, Turner, and Brand, I think I would do that. A frontline of Darko, Love, Randolph, and Brand could still use an upgrade at center, but is pretty interesting. The team still needs an athletic small forward that can shoot the ball, but it’s a start.

The problem is, it’s difficult to see how that would work with GS and Philly.

Jefferson and 4 to GS
Radmanovic (expiring) and Ellington and 6 to Philly
2, Randolph, Azubuike and Brand to MN

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 10:47 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe something like

Jefferson + Sessions to Detroit for Prince + # 7

  1. + #23 to GS for AR + #6

Prince + Gomes + # 7 + # 16 to Philly for #2 + Brand

I agree with you a Randolph, Love, Darko, Brand frontcourt is intersting. We’d still have #6 after these three trades to grab the athletic small forward, someone like Johnson, George, or Aminu.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

The 1 should be #4, but the reason I think you need to do the Detroit deal is because we need a large expiring (Prince) to give Philly for Brand. You could also give Philly #6 instead of #7.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

That works too

In my version, Radmanovic is the expiring.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

So you couldn’t complete your deal until after the moratorium in July as we need to trade our cap space I would imagine. Not sure how much VladRad makes, but probably not enough to approach Brand’s salary.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's right

He’s around 7 million. But the reason it would have to wait isn’t radmanovic, it’s that Brand+AR+Azubuike is enough more than Jefferson that we would have to wait for the cap space. Still, it leaves room to sign Darko.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Would giving Gomes and Hollins to Philly solve it?

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is really close

I think you might need to send Gomes and/or Sessions to Philly instead of Ellington to make it work.
So, it would be…
Jefferson and 4 to GS
Radmonovic, Gomes, Sessions and 6 to Philly
2, Randolph, Azubuike and Brand to MN

I would absolutely do that, and I think the other teams would, too.
It’s almost too much on our end, but if we’re coming out of it with Turner, Randolph and Azubuike, and still have our 16, 23 and Pek to move around in the draft, that’s pretty appealing.

Check out Humdinger TV on YouTube.
http://twitter.com/HumdingerTV

by HumdingerTV on Jun 4, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure, if they would prefer those guys, I'd do it

Not sure they would, though. Gomes is just a cut, Sessions…sure, if they want him.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yikes, those of us at GSoM are sorry we asked.

Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!

by StinkyFingers on Jun 4, 2010 11:00 AM CDT reply actions  

A bit surprised most are so negative on Randolph and his potential

At this time of year, all the talk is about how much upside the draftees have and ,in general, people seem pretty willing to project their favorite of the bunch as a star a few years down the road. But Randolph, despite being almost a year younger than Turner doesn’t seem to be getting the same optimistic treatment. I know he’s a bit raw in some aspects and his maturity is still in question but Randolph has as much upside and likelihood or reaching his potential as anyone available at #4.

Also, I’m not sure why people are saying Randolph has not been productive. Randolph posted a PER of 16.94 in 2008-2009 (as the youngest rookie in that class I believe) and PER fo 18.71 in 2009-2010. I’m also not sure why people have questioned his rebounding, he may not be on Love’s level, but he’s posted the same rebound rate as Al Jeff in each of his 2 seasons and he’s only likely to get bigger and stronger as he progresses. I know there is a tendency to discount any stats coming out of Golden State’s system but don’t forget that Randolph has also had to deal with the most dysfunctional front office and coaching staff in the league and Don Nelson’s mind games and pathological mistrust of big men.

People have compared him to Odom, but I think Randolph can be a much better player; he’s more explosive, a better shot-blocker, a better free-throw shooter and potentially a better finisher and outside shooter than Odom. I know its pretty useless to cherry pick boxscores, especially with Warriors players, but take a glance at his line against Orlando last year where he played C and was matched up with Howard: 28 points, 13 rebs, 5 asts, O TOs, 1 stl, 1 blk. I know Turner and Cousins had some great games last year, but were any of them more impressive than that one? http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=291205009

I’m not sure its worth giving up Love or even Al Jeff for A Rand, but depending on who’s available at 6, this could be a steal.

Also, I think I read somewhere that the W’s would be unlikely to take on a contract like Jefferson’s while the team is for sale. Besides, Jefferson would be a terrible fit for the W’s, he’s a ball-stopper on a team already full of ball-stoppers and is a half-court player and the W’s are a running team. Love would be a great fit on the W’s with his outside shooting, rebounding and outlet passing, but as I said above I would not give him up in this deal.

 

by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 11:44 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

the problem with that

is that there are no data points for current production for prospects, while there is for Randolph. yes the potential is there, but as of yet he hasn’t made serious progress towards achieving it. The other’s haven’t had the chance and get the benefit of the doubt in their favor. Potential only overshadows production when there isn’t information to cast legit doubt on a players ability to get there. For Randolph there is a little (plus the injury concerns).

That and fans always dream that their team will be fixed via the draft since hope springs eternal.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

I get the injury concerns...

They might be overblown, or they might be the tip of the iceberg, a thorough physical might address those, if not, only time will tell.

But I still don’t get the production issues…he has produced and has shown progress towards reaching his potential. When he was drafted the book on him was that he was really raw and was years away from producing, instead he came in and put up pretty impressive per minute numbers in a several areas (notably rebounding and shot blocking) as evidenced by his rookie PER of 16.9. He missed a lot of time last year, but his PER improved to 18.7. It seems to me all the data points show that Randolph’s development is ahead of schedule and on an upward trajectory.

by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think a fair portion of his problems

are due to getting jacked around by the FO/Nelly. Young players need PT and consistent clear instructions, which Nelly has provided neither. I guess my perception is that GS wants to get rid of him and that sends pretty strong signals that they don’t think they can develop him (for whatever reason). Maybe a change of scenery is needed, maybe just a new coaching staff. But that perceptions knocks a lot of the value off that potential. Teams don’t move sure things or likely to get there guys.

So GS the team can’t sell the but he has so much potential card.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

The concerns I have with Randolph are between the ears. A lack of self awareness prevents him from playing to his strengths and to receive consistent playing time. His lack of maturity in failing to transform his body into a professional basketball player’s body i believe is directly related to his poor injury history. Finally, his lack of court awareness makes me hesitant to project a linear improvement in his skills on the court. He will always have a huge advantage physically and athletically over his opponents, but without self-awareness and court-awareness, it will be tough to harness that and turn it into a winning basketball player. This is probably why his teams from high school, to college, to the NBA have never been winning teams. Yes you can’t put the blame solely on Randolph, but it’s part of his package at this point.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those are my concerns as well...

And I have no idea how well founded they are…he could mature one day like Josh Smith, or he could be more like Tyrus Thomas. I do think it is waaaay too early to knock him for still being skinny. He’s still growing and by all accounts is putting on muscle this off-season.

by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Simplest take

The Warriors have had the best chance to evaluate and work with Randolph. They are shopping him after a season and a half. That’s an indicator that it’s time to be cautious.

Also, Wolves fans have experience with another player who was a summer-league phenom and disappointed (Foye).

by Punisher#8 on Jun 4, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Equally simple take...

The Warriors are dysfunctional and Don Nelson has severe issues with consistent playing time and big men in particular.

Also, Randolph has played well in NBA games, not just summer league.

by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough.

I wouldn’t mind having him at all, but the pieces would have to line up in a certain way. I think Randolph and Cousins would complement each other nicely for the Wolves, though I think Love and Cousins would work well and we don’t have to bet on Randolph’s upside (which admittedly could be higher than Love). The problem is, that is dependent on the Wolves getting Cousins, who I doubt makes it to 6. Randolph + Jefferson or Darko isn’t overly appealing.

by Punisher#8 on Jun 4, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, Cousins is a better match for both Love and A Rand than they are for each other and I doubt Cousins will be there at 6 as well, if he was teams would be targetting the 6th pick instead of the 4th. But, from a value prospective A Rand is very appealing if they don’t have to give up Love.

by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Correct. Statistically at least, Randolph compares very well to guys like KG and Bosh at the same age. If they think he’s a baby Bosh…

by jianfu on Jun 4, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about

Al for Randolph and Biedrins?

by PoorDick on Jun 4, 2010 1:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Are you asking that just to hurt my heart?

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm asking

in SPITE of my deep respect and appreciation for you dropping by not often enough.

It’s kind of funny that these two high-lotto teams think they can pull the wool over each other’s eyes, when if recent history is any indication, any trade between the two will likely make both teams worse.

by PoorDick on Jun 4, 2010 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

not true

I like this trade
Love+ either hollins, sessions or gomes for Randolph, Azubuike +6 is a fair deal

by KahningPups on Jun 5, 2010 4:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

oh plus we give them 16th pick in the deal

but long term wise either Al or Kevin have to go and kevin is easier to trade.

by KahningPups on Jun 5, 2010 4:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

One benefit of this trade rumor is that it provides us with greater leverage in trying to move up because it shows our potential trading partner that we have an alternative.

by mnlawyer on Jun 4, 2010 1:42 PM CDT reply actions  

I’m absolutely not interested in dealing 4 for Randolph, but I would not be opposed to trading something else for him. Lots of talent and length, and looking at the Lakers the last few weeks, it’s clear that length needs to be added to the Wolves

by Madsen's 3-Point Barrage on Jun 4, 2010 2:13 PM CDT reply actions  

This is what concerns me

From their own blog, they describe him like this…

Randolph has an immense amount of physical talent and god given ability, but more often than not he plays basketball like a chicken with his head cut off. You know it’s bad when a low hoops IQ player like Monta Ellis is yelling at you because you’re not executing properly.

I have to have someone convince me we aren’t getting a Hollins level BBIQ. I get AR has been much more productive, but after a string of Carney, Green, and Hollins (et. al.) I’m not all that interested in adding him for anything near the #4. Something cheaper, probably, but I’d rather risk Cousins (who produced phenominally in college) than AR who is producing some, but has both been injured and has some question to his BBIQ.

Not to offend anyone, I’m sure he has better BBIQ than Hollins (which isn’t saying much), I was just using hyperbole to make a point. I haven’t personally watched him play.

by Cedarpenguin on Jun 4, 2010 3:02 PM CDT reply actions  

the ghost of green visited me as well when I read that bit

Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009

by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 4, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Carney wasn't out of control here, so much.

He played within his limitations, more or less.

If you’re making a “chicken with his head cut off” list of Minnesota players, Corey Brewer has to be on that list somewhere.

"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR

by feral on Jun 4, 2010 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Even if

he’s all over the place and needs to settle down, he’s putting up 16-18 PER’s while doing it at like age 19 and 20. That’s pretty impressive. If a guy with those physical tools and that production settles down, which is likely as he matures, he could be something very special.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 7, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would do this trade if we could not get ET for #4 and #23

In Randolph we could have a poor mans KG which I think is better then what K-love can give us. Plus if we are going to be a running team we need guys like Randolph on the team.

by chuckd@79 on Jun 4, 2010 3:50 PM CDT reply actions  

Rubio

just said he won’t be here til 2011. Gotta love the spin on the ESPN article, making it sound AGAIN like he doesn’t want to be here. All he said was that he’s “open to everything”, and they twist his words. Read the article, its ridiculous.

Not only that, it isn’t like he has a choice…

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5252905

by bbeeck on Jun 4, 2010 4:06 PM CDT reply actions  

It seems like the media really wants him to go to a NY-type market.

by mnlawyer on Jun 4, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

It is such a conventional storyline: The young star wants to go the bright lights of a big city like NY or LA. I think it reflects a lazy media more than anything else. Sad and disappointing. Another reason why I prefer to get my analysis from a site like this.

by mnlawyer on Jun 4, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

So true

The headline is incredibly misleading. I clicked on it thinking that he was trashing MN or something….and nope. Didn’t even say a word about it.

by bbeeck on Jun 4, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do you think the storyline changes if/when Lebron and Wade both pass on NYC?

by Punisher#8 on Jun 4, 2010 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know;

I responded to you on the other thread, but I think it takes a pretty willful refusal to accept the evidence to suggest that he’s excited about the Timberwolves. I think it’s pretty clear that he is not, and would rather go somewhere else. Hopefully, that isn’t enough for him to refuse to come, and I don’t think it will be.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still think his desire to play in the NBA ultimately trumps

His non-desire to play for MN. And once he gets here, then everthing changes. Sure, maybe he hates it in MN, but I bet if you asked a lot of pros, they’d say they wouldn’t live in the place where they were drafted if it weren’t for work. Then the place grows on them. This is especially magnified when you’re dealing with a foreign player. And frankly, Ricky needs to grow a sac, play for the team that drafted him, become a free agent and then move if he still hates it. And if he wants to cry about it, then he can stay in Spain and cry. It sucks for Wolves, but clearly Kahn’s not going to trade him.

by BDavige on Jun 4, 2010 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think he’ll come, and then it either works out or it doesn’t. I certainly would not trade him in almost any circumstances.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

If there's no lockout in 2011, he'll play for the Wolves

and I’ll laugh when Sports Guy has to go to the home opener.

by BDavige on Jun 4, 2010 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Would it be too Minnesota-Twinslike to acquire Rudy Fernandez? Bah, who cares? Let’s get him!

by jianfu on Jun 4, 2010 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Givony from DraftExpress tweets about a Love for Randolph swap
Anthony Randolph for Kevin Love? Heard some chatter about that from a pretty good source. Makes sense for both teams. Need to dig a bit more

by Norsktroll on Jun 4, 2010 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

Yikes

I would not support that deal

by TimAllen on Jun 4, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nor I

I like Randolph, but not at that cost. Too many injuries.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

At some point we need to balance our frontcourt physical profiles and skill-sets. With Pekovic, Jefferson, and Love as assets we hold; Darko waiting on the wings; and Cousins being the most likely guy to fall to #4, something has to give. I’d rather it not be Love as well, but I can see the merit in doing this deal.

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I understand the reasoning, I just think it’s bad value.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just think at some point

Kahn is going to have to take a risk with a guy that has tremendous upside. It might be sticking with Cousins at #4. It might be trading Love for Randolph. It might be something else….I wonder what people would have said about this trade right after Summer League last year?

by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like this deal

Better than Love + #4 for Randolph + #6. If we take Cousins at #4, he projects to be the same beast on the boards that KLove is with size to defend his position. I must admit that this deal is something I may be able to support.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow...

if you’re open to that trade perhaps I need to change my mind.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel the same way

Randolph’s ceiling is immense AND he’s a potentially excellent fit next to DMC.

Is it a gamble? Yes. Do you win in the NBA with top end talent? Also a yes. If it pays off and we wind up one of the best front courts in the league, one that could contend easily with the Lakers/Blazers of the world, then Kahn would look like a genius.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 7, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's a bit of a fallacy

We’ll end up with one of the best frontcourts in the NBA regardless.

by John Doe on Jun 8, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Me neither. I’m not a huge Love fan, but he’s a known quantity…too much risk with AR IMO.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

That’s tough. On the one hand, if they’re going to deal Love for a more contemporary/conventional player, Randolph’s not the worst option. On the other, at the very least those two players are a push right now. Randolph’s got the higher ceiling and is much more athletic, but if he doesn’t reach it or ends up just getting hurt too much, bad deal. Fatalistic Wolves fan I am, I just imagine Love and Curry developing into a devastating high screen-and-roll tandem and feeling the way I do when I watch Brandon Roy.

And if we’re still including the pick swap, that’s worse. Minny gives up the better (IMO), more durable player and the better draft pick. That’s as of Summer 2010, of course, and things could change. But that just seems like way too much to sacrifice for what would essentially be a stylistic facelift (e.g., Love and Cousins for Randolph and Johnson).

I don’t know. I was intrigued when I thought it was #4 for Randolph and #6. I don’t like that Love’s now in the picture.

by jianfu on Jun 4, 2010 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, now that you mention it...

I might just jump to the Warriors if Love gets shipped there for Randolph. Curry and Love pick-and-roll tandem at last!

by LoveTo on Jun 4, 2010 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

New news on Rumor

Looks like Randolph value is greater than Loves. Way more perceived upside. Warriors may want Love and the #4 for Randolph. Apparently TWolves want Randolph BADLY!!!! More than Canis Hoopis realizes!

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami/2010/06/04/should-the-warriors-consider-trading-randolph-yes-but-carefully/#more-8192

Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!

by StinkyFingers on Jun 4, 2010 6:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Why don't you read the article first you trolling homer
If I’m Riley, I’m asking for Kevin Love in any Randolph deal. Ideally, I’d want Love AND Randolph–that’d be a very nice 4-5 combo in stretches–but that’s not happening.

So it’s Love for Randolph, with the Warriors having to throw in C.J. Watson (if he agrees to a sign-and-trade as a restricted free agent) to balance the salaries.

If I’m the Warriors, I probably ask for a flop of the 4 and 6 picks, but I doubt Minnesota does that.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice piece...

of columnist speculation. The same columnist you discredited yesterday…

by BDavige on Jun 4, 2010 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kawakami is a rumor monger. The same guy that told us Monta Ellis would demand a trade if the Warriors drafted a guard is behind that column. As is the usual case with local columnists, nothing to see here. Of course, since it’s Kawakami, less than nothing to see here.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is Givony a rumor monger?

I rarely see him post trade rumors on his twitter so the fact he did leaves me to believe this more than just a local GSW beat reporter driving this.

by Ebomb on Jun 4, 2010 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

No no no, not the trade rumor itself, that I do believe is being discussed, just all the added bits that he seems to enjoy tossing in and hoping someone takes them as fact. Things like “So it’s Love for Randolph with the Warriors throwing in CJ Watson after a sign and trade” and “Randolph is worth Love and a pick switch.” It sounds like Randolph is being shopped to the Wolves, and beyond that, it doesn’t sound like anyone really knows much in the way of details. Odds are, nothing’s happening, and any of the TK suggestions are even less likely. Wait and see is all we can do at this point.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

its clear in reading the articles that

the TWolves are the ones starting this dialogue. They have a real hardon for AR and have since last year. Time for them to pony up, and pay full value. AR & 6 for Love & 4 is the fair equitable deal and works for both teams.

Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!

by StinkyFingers on Jun 4, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

It really isn’t a fair and equitable deal. It’s highway robbery for the Warriors. This is a four player draft and the Warriors just swapped out a somewhat effective, but potential filled Anthony Randolph and (probably) a 23 year old solid player in Wes Johnson for an ultra productive Kevin Love and an ultra productive Demarcus Cousins. That is a huge victory for Golden State.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 4, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

did he just quote the article

that was written by a hack as adding clarity?

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

How is it clear that it's the Timberwolves? Seems like mutual interest to me.

You need to stop presenting opinions as fact. Also, being so insistent and almost pushy about how fair the possible trade you’re presenting is – and exaggerating Randolph’s abilites while discrediting Love’s – makes it seem pretty obvious that you think the trade is better for your team. Playing off what is generally seen as a pretty unfair trade for the T-Wolves (even by other GSOM posters’ standards) as fair or “good enough” seems pretty disingenuous to me.

by nja700 on Jun 5, 2010 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Funny

That fans get so worked up about another fan’s ignorance. It’s not like he makes the trades or his opinion really matters. Kahn isn’t going to be convinced by some guy named StickyFingers that he sould make a stupid deal..

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 7, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Literally every post he had on the thread over at GSOM was saying that it was all a Kawakami rumor and that he’s not to be trusted. Whether that’s true or not, you lose sway when you change positions so quickly.

by nja700 on Jun 5, 2010 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

It seems like the columnist is speculating Love-for-Randolph straight up. He also seems to have sentiment most here do: Randolph has better upside, but Love so far’s the better producer.

Also, Tim Kawakama alert! Keep in mind last time this dude was connecting the dots between the Dubs and the Wolves, he had KG going to Golden State for Brandon Wright, Andres Biedrins, and filler. It all hinged on that weird draft day trade where the Dubs gave up Jason Richardson for the #8 pick, and a malfunctioning telephone or two that caused Mullen to guess incorrectly on which player the Wolves wanted drafted in GState’s spot. Maybe there was something to it (and parts of the circuslike story do seem, well, McHaleian), but obviously in the end it was a moot point.

by jianfu on Jun 4, 2010 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

What's crazy

Is that that same sort of trade that he presented for KG could be bandied about for Al nowadays (or when Al was healthy). While that Al hypothetical is probably a bad trade for the Warriors, it still says something about how bad of an idea the KG-Warriors trade was at the time that it could plausibly be discussed for Al at any point.

by nja700 on Jun 5, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had been opposed to trading Love, but come to think of it, Jefferson/Randolph might just be a better pairing than Love/Randolph.

If we’re talking for a trade based around Love for Randolph, maybe we could get #34? Anything else?

by callmeishmael on Jun 4, 2010 6:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Obviously it depends on what the final deal looks like, if there is one

but these rumors help to confirm my biggest fear: that Kahn and Rambis have utterly failed to properly evaluate Kevin Love’s worth on the basketball court. It seemed that this was a problem during the season, as Rambis cut Love’s minutes despite the fact that he was, you know, the team’s best player.

Nobody on the roster is or should be untouchable, but a deal like this-straight up for AR, is just not acceptable value in my opinion.

We Are the Washington Generals

by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 6:48 PM CDT reply actions  

it’s certainly a fair fear.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have to admit though

that of every single Love trade suggestion that I have heard, this one takes the cake as being the most feasable as a core trade.

A Darko Fan since 2010!

by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly, I like Love a lot, but this solves

the Love/Al death match and gets us a decent return and more importantly someone with a higher ceiling, which is what a 15 win team needs. And we’re still in the top 4.

by BDavige on Jun 4, 2010 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think if Love goes

it signals that there is nothing of remote value being offered for Jefferson, and Kahn figures he might as well get something for somebody, and hopefully Al will either improve enough to help the team or bump up his tradeworthiness. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long three years under the weight of that contract.

by PoorDick on Jun 4, 2010 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not really

You’re way overestimating the negative impact of Al’s deal. He might be slightly overpaid for 3 years, but he’s not going to be an immovable object. He’ll be a 25-28 year old 20/10 big guy. If he clearly loses a step due to his injury, then maybe you’ll be right, but I think he’ll be back to being fairly productive.

When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.

by Xand1 on Jun 7, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree with EiM

How this 15 win team could actually take a step backward I have no idea. But they’re trying.

In three years we may be as good as Memphis

by Son of Gerald Green on Jun 4, 2010 7:00 PM CDT reply actions  

Trade rumors are also fascinating trial balloons. Let’s suppose this rumor has some merit. If Love has more value in the marketplace than AR, Kahn’s phone should be ringing off the hook with offers from other GMs saying “Are you crazy? I’ll give you player X, who is clearly better than AR, for Love.”

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 7:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Just a Fan

We need him to determine the merit and parameters of this discussion.

We need a Just A Fan alert like the Bat signal.

by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 7:09 PM CDT reply actions  

this pretty much says it all

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/402584-golden-state-warriors-update-june-72010-anthony-randolph-trade-rumors?utm_source=newsletter

Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!

by StinkyFingers on Jun 7, 2010 5:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Bleacher Report?

 Not to say the website doesn’t have its merits, but it’s hardly a place to go for reputable sources and investigative journalism, or even very good op/eds. It’s essentially the same sort of thing you’d find on some fan’s personal blog or a random fanpost. That article is 100 percent some Warrior fan’s opinion, and I don’t see how that really adds to this discussion if he’s not participating in it over here.

On a side note, the guy fits in a lot of questionable points in a sentence where he say that Aminu is Igu"a"dala “without the shot.” Iguodala isn’t a great shooter in the first place, and he’s a swingman. Aminu is a larger combo forward that doesn’t have the passing skills that Iggy does. That’s also before he accuses Stern of telling the refs to “fix” the series so that it goes to 6 or 7 games, and after he says that Randolph is Golden State’s most talented player since Rick Barry. Not the best guy to cite, in my eyes.

by nja700 on Jun 7, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Randolph isn’t even the most talented current Warrior. That article was awful—an embarassment.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 7, 2010 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

why all the bitter negativity? Randolph is a young stud. Are you really a Warrior fan?

by skeptic con urqeul on Jun 7, 2010 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can be a Warriors fan without being a homer. I’d take Steph Curry 11 times out of 10 over Randolph. Randolph is productive, but he’s nowhere near the most talented Warrior since Rick Barry and there are certainly players besides LeBron James that I’d be comfortable trading Randolph for. That article was ridiculous.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jun 7, 2010 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

skeptic? Is Cap’n giving you a hard time too? He’s oh so negative!

Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!

by StinkyFingers on Jun 7, 2010 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Singing the Memphis Blues: Wolves Report Card 2/8/12
Img_2198_small
Not another Spaniard... hold up... wot?
George_mikan_small
I was there the Night Anthony Morrow scored 42 points
Small
Not 'yet another spaniard'...
Small
Another Spaniard fan! thanks for this forum :)

Recent FanPosts

Small
An Idiot Abroad
Small
D12? Welcome to the Island of Misfit Toys (With Poll!!!)
Small
2/10 Dallas -2 at Wolves
Small
My thoughts on the game last night
148822_1678175523391_1507601904_1661509_8222729_n_small
Austin Rivers?
Me_small
I'm Going to Friday's Game Against the Mavs!
Beard_small
2012 NBA Rumor/Happenings Thread
Small
Trade Love - It Just Makes Sense.
Small
All around the globe

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    HOOPUS FAQ

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • Despairy Home Companion
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko
    • Weird, unhealthy Darko mania
    • les goûts et les couleurs ne se discutent pas
    • Basketball success makes character issues forgivable
    • Building the Boogie Bandwagon
    • Building the Dream....One Power Forward At A Time
    • Kids, Puppy Dogs, And Long Walks In The Park
    • SWITCH THE FLIP!!!
    • Team Red Pill.
    • December is Bunny Month. Survive it with insincerity and Merle Haggard.
    • Like having a really good seat at a beheading.
    • We've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we're not savages. We're Wolves fans, and Wolves fans are best at everything.
    • Getting Real Mythological
    • Trapped in Punxsawawney
    • BIIYYYOOOMMMBOOOOOOO!!!
    • Estoy llevando mi talento a Minnesota
    • Where sharks do battle with giant eagles
    • You don’t put a saddle and reins on a magical unicorn, you bareback it and put faith in nature
    • Toeing the line between nerd and loser

    Hoopus Recipe Book

    Let's Settle This:


    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Journey_small Stop-n-Pop

    Rviy7fbgmhz5ht2dpgo6q0jfu_small TimAllen

    Editors

    Wolveslogo_small Oceanary

    Authors

    Small SG

    Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler