RUMOR: Golden State Warriors and Minnesota Timberwolves talking Anthony Randolph and #4 pick in 2010 NBA Draft [GSoM]
What's the interest level in Randolph around these parts?
over 1 year ago
Atma Brother ONE
158 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Yeah, you have posters over there saying their hesitant to give up Randolph straight up for #4. Talk about delusional. Or maybe I’m delusional. Either way, I’m glad Kahn doesn’t have to negotiate with those fans.
I wouldn’t be shocked to eventually see Paul George as a legitimate prospect at #6.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions
George/Randolph/Whiteside or Henry or Anderson?
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe Whiteside and Anderson if either falls to 23.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions
It's McHale all over again!
The Timberwolves could be a farm system to whoever our GM’s favorite team is!
The Timberwolves: Where Stephen Curry doesn't happen :(
by BetterLaettnerThanRider on Jun 4, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Eh, this move doesn't excite me
for #16 for sure though
"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Jun 4, 2010 12:59 AM CDT reply actions
If the Warriors trade Anthony Randolph for solely the 16th pick
I won’t say I’d stab myself, but I’d sure feel like it.
Stab Nellie.
It’ll console all of us.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
I'd be satisfied
with just a little liposuction after someone posted the Nellie Belly pics last spring. Ewwww.
"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."
Mark Twain
Aren't Kahn and co. in Europe?
I question how serious the talks are if our whole front office is across the globe watching Pekovic and Rubio.
That said I’d love to get Randolph if he were reasonably priced.
From the article itself
The discussions between the two clubs took place last week when several teams, including the Warriors, sent representatives to Minnesota to watch 42 potential draft picks work out at the Timberwolves’ practice facility.
Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009
by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 4, 2010 5:48 AM CDT up reply actions
hehe thx; you started my day with a laugh :)
Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009
by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 5, 2010 1:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Just having a quick read at GSoM
Sounds like the Dubs FO like Wes Johnson.
In which case:
1. They could likely stay put and still get him (if the Monroe to Sacto business is to be believed).
2. We draft him and then could still take one of Cousins or Aminu at 6. Aminu would make sense at 6 with Randolph on the books.
3. Does lead to quite a logjam in the big man department.
"I was trying to focus on breathing," Milicic said. "I was just focusing on breathing so I didn’t die."
it could
but couldn’t Randolph play the 3? what he lacks in quickness he may make up for in length. he’s a rail! he’s got some handles too… just a thought. in my mind, if we get randolph, we don’t need aminu. we should get a legit 2. george or henry would make me happy right now.
Supposedly he's gained 20 pounds of muscle.
Supposedly the Wolves are following his workouts, and know that.
Supposedly.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Randolph can’t play the wing. It’s been tried. It’s failed. Miserably.
He’s a legit 7 footer who is adding muscle every year. He’s a 4/5, not a 3/4.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
sample size is way to small to come to that conclusion.
by skeptic con sleepy freud on Jun 5, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions
It wouldn't suprise me one bit
if Kahn’s real goal was to have a frontcourt of Cousins/Randolph/Love. There is size, shotblocking and rebounding ability. But I still have no idea who they could convert Al (if they are even planing too) into on the wing?
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions
Perfect
That is the front court I’d want if we’re looking at Randolph. He’s rangy, athletic and a great shot-blocker so he’d be a great fit out there with Cousins and Love. If we’re keeping love in that scenario, then I’d imagine we would have to move Al in order to constrct it, so what we do with him is probably moot.
We’d be weak on the wings for the immediate future, but that’s a front court you can move forward with. Also, if they do have any interest in Al, the deal would have to include someone to make salaries match so we’d presumably get a wing there. Then I’d try to keep 16 and 23 to go after some of those mid round prospects like James Anderson/George etc. Or try to nab a 1 on 1 creator/scorer like Jordan Crawford in the 2nd.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
when someone said that GS was high on
Wes and SAC likes Monroe, it just kind of popped into my head. A rotation of Love, Cousins and Randolph is pretty solid. The wolves would resign Darko for a short contract and let Cousins work to try to get the starting spot over next year. You give Darko somekind of Euro opt out if he is dissatisfied with his PT (continues the wolves practice of making sure they treat vets well) and lets Cousins and Randolph focus on playing soundly with no mind games. Let Love and Darko start for the year together.
Having this frontcourt should open a little more room in the paint for Jonny/Sessions. Ellington will get more burn at 2 this year which should improve Jonny’s drive and kicks with Randolph being athletic enough (with good enough hands) to throw down on interior big man passes better than Love and Al could.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions
I like that frontcourt too
But we’d REALLY need a great shooting SG to make that work. Also, who/what are we hypothetically giving up for Randolph? The #4 is waaaaay too steep, and would preclude us getting Cousins.
Darko/Randolph/Love works too
Add a premier SG and we are good to go. I’m looking forward to becoming a Steamer fan too.
this is true
Admittedly, this does tremendously strengthen the wolves frontcourt and I can understand how Kahn might be willing to make this trade if he feels they can develop Randolph better than GS (which shouldn’t be hard given Nelly).
Would George be a target? I wouldn’t think it would be Aminu if we are getting Randolph.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions
If that's gonna be his nickname
it’s a good thing Stiemsma doesn’t play for Cleveland
I looked ahead to the open road, thought about the people and what they know, and wrote a book called "People Don't Know Nothin!"
Uhh, that is not a great line-up, unless LeBron is our SG
Or was this in jest? I need that internet tone detector.
On the other hand,
there’s also a post over there to the effect that the deal wouldn’t go down until draft night, and would be triggered if the Wolves get (whoever) at #4 and the Warriors have Wes Johnson to take at #6. Minnesota would trade down for Johnson, picking up Randolph for so doing…. or sumpin’ like that.
Simultaneously multiple posters are saying the Warriors have Johnson third on their board. So.
(I’m just relieved to have the Wolves making some noise at their usual every-two-weeks-in-summertime pace. You have to water that field of wheat for it to grow, man. Regular like.)
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Sacto's fans
are giddy at the prospect of drafting Wes at 5. They think he’s the perfect guy to put next to ‘Reke. I hate this draft – we get shafted out of getting Turner, and we can’t move down a couple spots and pick up Wes either. Unless we can figure out how to get #2 or 3 without giving up #4 there’s no way we’ll end up with Turner/Wes, Turner/Favors, Favors/Wes, etc.
"Styx might be the mullet of bands."
If nothing else...
it sounds like Kahn is exploring a lot of options, which is good to read and not at all surprising.
Only real message we can take away.
He’s active, as usual.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Yeah...
it’s funny how the fanbase has a pretty narrow list of possible scenarios — most of which involve trading up to Philly — and Kahn is probably on the phone with every GM not-named Kupchak or Ainge, these days. The guy knows how to make an exciting June, even if November through April leave a lot to be desired.
you know your a wolves fan when...
your offseason is more exciting than your regular season.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
No doubt
Or when Summer League games draw more Wolves fans than regular season games. The SL is like the apex of the Wolves’ fan year since we get to see all of the shiny new objects we just drafted. From then on out it’s a slow slide into depression that exists until the season ends. Then we perk up again for the lottery!
by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions
This year's Vegas roster is going to be amazing.
We know Flynn and Ellington will both be there, Hoiberg and Bickerstaff told us that. How many rookies do we add to that list?
Could be the summer juggernaut we’ve all been waiting on.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Hopefully...
I’m making my maiden voyage to SL…should be fun to check-out.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions
If Kahn has decided he's willing to take on Brand's contract...
Then maybe he can move down to #6, acquire Randolph, and then Trade #6 to Philly for #2 and Brand.
I might not be opposed to that.
Talking myself into DeMarcus Cousins since 5/18/10
What's the term for that?
Is it some sort of “boomerang” deal if you trade down and then back up?
Eh. Probably would happen as a three-way deal, so we wouldn’t see it that way. That would be the intermediate step in the reaction.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Plus move Al Jeff to the Pistons for #7 and Tayshaun and draft the best wing available, or package 16 and 23 to move up to grab Xavier Henry.
Updated Depth Chart under said scenario
PG: (Rubio)/Flynn/Sessions
SG: Turner/Brewer
SF: Prince/AF Aminu/Brewer
PF/C Rotation: Love/Randolph/Pekovic/Brand
Talk about length! We could at one point trot out a lineup of Randolph/AF Aminu/Prince/Brewer/PG
Yowza!
Talking myself into DeMarcus Cousins since 5/18/10
Very
interested. He’s exactyl the type of 4 we actually need on this team – long, skilled, great on the break and capable of blocking shots.
It depends on what GSW wants, though. I wouldn’t move or swap out of #4, but would possibly entertain something around Love or Al.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
Scenario
Love for Randolph
4 + 16 for Turner
Jefferson for Prince + 7
Prince + 7 for 5 + filler
Starting Lineup
Flynn (Rubio)
Turner
W. Johnson
Randolph
Darko
Bench
Sessions
Ellington
Brewer
Pekovic
I’d even throw the #23 in if necessary, otherwise draft and stash Seraphin for next year
I wouldn’t mind paying to watch that team play.
That's
a bad rebounding team. I think you need to figure out how to keep Love for that reason.
"Styx might be the mullet of bands."
which makes me think
that even giving away our two current best players, there is no way we can build a roster without any holes. I believe that this offseason should be focused on building the most ideal/perfect team with one glaring hole. Then fix that hole next offseason.
I'm not sure that it's a bad rebounding team
Turner and Johnson will probably rebound better than average at the 2 and 3, and Randolph had the same rebounding rate as Al.
I don't think it's terrible
Turner/Wes should be solid, if not above average at their positions and Randolph is pretty good. We wouldn’t have a beastly rebounder like Love, but we should be able to be solidly middle of the pack if not better. We’d be about 10000000x better defensively, which should easily offset it.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
Seraphin is pulling his name out of the Draft.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
damnit anyways
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
It was because of that injury he sustained in the last couple of weeks.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions
unless he felt that was going to cause him to go undrafted
what’s the problem? He was still going to go in the second round at least. he could play out his foreign contract while he got healthy and then sign for whatever he wanted to come over. Oh well.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions
It was because he couldn’t do workouts. I think he may have wanted to come over this year.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions
most of his interest though
was for teams that were willing to stash. That way they wouldn’t have to pay him next year and then there is a lockout. Asset at no cost for when the lockout ends.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I’ll find the link and post it, may have been on Hoops World.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Are you 100 percent sure on this?
I know Motiejaunas dropped out, but DX’s twitter reports that his agent says he’s wide open and that he’ll stay in if he finds a good team in the 1st that likes him. DX is pretty connected on foreign players, so I trust them quite a bit.
Seraphin possibly dropping out because of injuries
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I think teams want to work him out before they draft him.
by AnotherDraftPickBitesTheDust on Jun 4, 2010 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Too much
So we’re trading Jefferson, Love, #4, and #16 for Turner, Johnson, and Randolph?
It might be interesting, but it’s too much.
I have no problem with trading the 4 and 16 for Turner, but would you really trade Jefferson and Love, two very solid bigs, for Johnson and Randolph?
Would you trade Love straight up for Randolph? I probably wouldn’t.
Would you trade Jefferson straight up for Wes Johnson? I definitely wouldn’t
If you wouldn’t do these individually, then as a package it doesn’t make sense.
Yes
Even though Jefferson may have slightly more value than Johnson individually, Johnson is a perfect fit for our proposed running team AND Pekovic replaces 80% of what Jefferson can do.
Even though Love can throw some pretty mean outlet passes and rebound like a mofo, Randolph would be a better fit for the proposed style AND has a higher ceiling. He also has a lower floor than Love but at some point we are going to have to take on risk.
Bleh
Randolph is all promise and not much production. That is, when he is not hurt.
Randolph is a PF, and Jefferson and Love are both better players IMO. Jefferson is a 20 & 10 guy who commands a double. Love is a better 2 point shooter, 3 point shooter, rebounder, passer, etc.
GS would have to offer more value. Trading Love and #4 for #6? No effing way.
I could see trading Jefferson for their pick and a contract. I think I read somewhere that Ellis and Jefferson are tight, and GS has publicly stated they want to add a good big man.
"It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." -- Yogi Berra
Randolph has been pretty productive when healthy. He rebounds the ball well, is improving as passer and a scorer, though still needs to cut out some bad shots (18.5 per 36 at a .521 TS%), he makes his free throws (over 80%) and has been getting to the line more as his career progresses. If he could crash the boards as well as he did in year one, he’d already be a better than average player (dropped from 11.6 per 36 to 10.3)
Yeah, he’s promise heavy, production light, but the improvements he showed in nearly every area of the game at least give some hope that he might actually keep some of those promises.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
If I could turn Jefferson, the 4th pick, and smaller assets
Into Randolph, Turner, and Brand, I think I would do that. A frontline of Darko, Love, Randolph, and Brand could still use an upgrade at center, but is pretty interesting. The team still needs an athletic small forward that can shoot the ball, but it’s a start.
The problem is, it’s difficult to see how that would work with GS and Philly.
Jefferson and 4 to GS
Radmanovic (expiring) and Ellington and 6 to Philly
2, Randolph, Azubuike and Brand to MN
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 10:47 AM CDT reply actions
Maybe something like
Jefferson + Sessions to Detroit for Prince + # 7
- + #23 to GS for AR + #6
Prince + Gomes + # 7 + # 16 to Philly for #2 + Brand
I agree with you a Randolph, Love, Darko, Brand frontcourt is intersting. We’d still have #6 after these three trades to grab the athletic small forward, someone like Johnson, George, or Aminu.
The 1 should be #4, but the reason I think you need to do the Detroit deal is because we need a large expiring (Prince) to give Philly for Brand. You could also give Philly #6 instead of #7.
That works too
In my version, Radmanovic is the expiring.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions
So you couldn’t complete your deal until after the moratorium in July as we need to trade our cap space I would imagine. Not sure how much VladRad makes, but probably not enough to approach Brand’s salary.
That's right
He’s around 7 million. But the reason it would have to wait isn’t radmanovic, it’s that Brand+AR+Azubuike is enough more than Jefferson that we would have to wait for the cap space. Still, it leaves room to sign Darko.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
This is really close
I think you might need to send Gomes and/or Sessions to Philly instead of Ellington to make it work.
So, it would be…
Jefferson and 4 to GS
Radmonovic, Gomes, Sessions and 6 to Philly
2, Randolph, Azubuike and Brand to MN
I would absolutely do that, and I think the other teams would, too.
It’s almost too much on our end, but if we’re coming out of it with Turner, Randolph and Azubuike, and still have our 16, 23 and Pek to move around in the draft, that’s pretty appealing.
Check out Humdinger TV on YouTube.
http://twitter.com/HumdingerTV
Sure, if they would prefer those guys, I'd do it
Not sure they would, though. Gomes is just a cut, Sessions…sure, if they want him.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Yikes, those of us at GSoM are sorry we asked.
Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!
A bit surprised most are so negative on Randolph and his potential
At this time of year, all the talk is about how much upside the draftees have and ,in general, people seem pretty willing to project their favorite of the bunch as a star a few years down the road. But Randolph, despite being almost a year younger than Turner doesn’t seem to be getting the same optimistic treatment. I know he’s a bit raw in some aspects and his maturity is still in question but Randolph has as much upside and likelihood or reaching his potential as anyone available at #4.
Also, I’m not sure why people are saying Randolph has not been productive. Randolph posted a PER of 16.94 in 2008-2009 (as the youngest rookie in that class I believe) and PER fo 18.71 in 2009-2010. I’m also not sure why people have questioned his rebounding, he may not be on Love’s level, but he’s posted the same rebound rate as Al Jeff in each of his 2 seasons and he’s only likely to get bigger and stronger as he progresses. I know there is a tendency to discount any stats coming out of Golden State’s system but don’t forget that Randolph has also had to deal with the most dysfunctional front office and coaching staff in the league and Don Nelson’s mind games and pathological mistrust of big men.
People have compared him to Odom, but I think Randolph can be a much better player; he’s more explosive, a better shot-blocker, a better free-throw shooter and potentially a better finisher and outside shooter than Odom. I know its pretty useless to cherry pick boxscores, especially with Warriors players, but take a glance at his line against Orlando last year where he played C and was matched up with Howard: 28 points, 13 rebs, 5 asts, O TOs, 1 stl, 1 blk. I know Turner and Cousins had some great games last year, but were any of them more impressive than that one? http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=291205009
I’m not sure its worth giving up Love or even Al Jeff for A Rand, but depending on who’s available at 6, this could be a steal.
Also, I think I read somewhere that the W’s would be unlikely to take on a contract like Jefferson’s while the team is for sale. Besides, Jefferson would be a terrible fit for the W’s, he’s a ball-stopper on a team already full of ball-stoppers and is a half-court player and the W’s are a running team. Love would be a great fit on the W’s with his outside shooting, rebounding and outlet passing, but as I said above I would not give him up in this deal.
by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 11:44 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
the problem with that
is that there are no data points for current production for prospects, while there is for Randolph. yes the potential is there, but as of yet he hasn’t made serious progress towards achieving it. The other’s haven’t had the chance and get the benefit of the doubt in their favor. Potential only overshadows production when there isn’t information to cast legit doubt on a players ability to get there. For Randolph there is a little (plus the injury concerns).
That and fans always dream that their team will be fixed via the draft since hope springs eternal.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I get the injury concerns...
They might be overblown, or they might be the tip of the iceberg, a thorough physical might address those, if not, only time will tell.
But I still don’t get the production issues…he has produced and has shown progress towards reaching his potential. When he was drafted the book on him was that he was really raw and was years away from producing, instead he came in and put up pretty impressive per minute numbers in a several areas (notably rebounding and shot blocking) as evidenced by his rookie PER of 16.9. He missed a lot of time last year, but his PER improved to 18.7. It seems to me all the data points show that Randolph’s development is ahead of schedule and on an upward trajectory.
by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I think a fair portion of his problems
are due to getting jacked around by the FO/Nelly. Young players need PT and consistent clear instructions, which Nelly has provided neither. I guess my perception is that GS wants to get rid of him and that sends pretty strong signals that they don’t think they can develop him (for whatever reason). Maybe a change of scenery is needed, maybe just a new coaching staff. But that perceptions knocks a lot of the value off that potential. Teams don’t move sure things or likely to get there guys.
So GS the team can’t sell the but he has so much potential card.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
The concerns I have with Randolph are between the ears. A lack of self awareness prevents him from playing to his strengths and to receive consistent playing time. His lack of maturity in failing to transform his body into a professional basketball player’s body i believe is directly related to his poor injury history. Finally, his lack of court awareness makes me hesitant to project a linear improvement in his skills on the court. He will always have a huge advantage physically and athletically over his opponents, but without self-awareness and court-awareness, it will be tough to harness that and turn it into a winning basketball player. This is probably why his teams from high school, to college, to the NBA have never been winning teams. Yes you can’t put the blame solely on Randolph, but it’s part of his package at this point.
Those are my concerns as well...
And I have no idea how well founded they are…he could mature one day like Josh Smith, or he could be more like Tyrus Thomas. I do think it is waaaay too early to knock him for still being skinny. He’s still growing and by all accounts is putting on muscle this off-season.
by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Simplest take
The Warriors have had the best chance to evaluate and work with Randolph. They are shopping him after a season and a half. That’s an indicator that it’s time to be cautious.
Also, Wolves fans have experience with another player who was a summer-league phenom and disappointed (Foye).
Equally simple take...
The Warriors are dysfunctional and Don Nelson has severe issues with consistent playing time and big men in particular.
Also, Randolph has played well in NBA games, not just summer league.
by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Fair enough.
I wouldn’t mind having him at all, but the pieces would have to line up in a certain way. I think Randolph and Cousins would complement each other nicely for the Wolves, though I think Love and Cousins would work well and we don’t have to bet on Randolph’s upside (which admittedly could be higher than Love). The problem is, that is dependent on the Wolves getting Cousins, who I doubt makes it to 6. Randolph + Jefferson or Darko isn’t overly appealing.
I agree, Cousins is a better match for both Love and A Rand than they are for each other and I doubt Cousins will be there at 6 as well, if he was teams would be targetting the 6th pick instead of the 4th. But, from a value prospective A Rand is very appealing if they don’t have to give up Love.
by GregSandpaper on Jun 4, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm asking
in SPITE of my deep respect and appreciation for you dropping by not often enough.
It’s kind of funny that these two high-lotto teams think they can pull the wool over each other’s eyes, when if recent history is any indication, any trade between the two will likely make both teams worse.
not true
I like this trade
Love+ either hollins, sessions or gomes for Randolph, Azubuike +6 is a fair deal
oh plus we give them 16th pick in the deal
but long term wise either Al or Kevin have to go and kevin is easier to trade.
I’m absolutely not interested in dealing 4 for Randolph, but I would not be opposed to trading something else for him. Lots of talent and length, and looking at the Lakers the last few weeks, it’s clear that length needs to be added to the Wolves
by Madsen's 3-Point Barrage on Jun 4, 2010 2:13 PM CDT reply actions
This is what concerns me
From their own blog, they describe him like this…
Randolph has an immense amount of physical talent and god given ability, but more often than not he plays basketball like a chicken with his head cut off. You know it’s bad when a low hoops IQ player like Monta Ellis is yelling at you because you’re not executing properly.
I have to have someone convince me we aren’t getting a Hollins level BBIQ. I get AR has been much more productive, but after a string of Carney, Green, and Hollins (et. al.) I’m not all that interested in adding him for anything near the #4. Something cheaper, probably, but I’d rather risk Cousins (who produced phenominally in college) than AR who is producing some, but has both been injured and has some question to his BBIQ.
Not to offend anyone, I’m sure he has better BBIQ than Hollins (which isn’t saying much), I was just using hyperbole to make a point. I haven’t personally watched him play.
the ghost of green visited me as well when I read that bit
Official Kahn/Rambis band-wagon rider since 2009
by Wim (Belgium) on Jun 4, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Carney wasn't out of control here, so much.
He played within his limitations, more or less.
If you’re making a “chicken with his head cut off” list of Minnesota players, Corey Brewer has to be on that list somewhere.
"No experience has been too unimportant, and the smallest event unfolds like a fate..." RMR
Even if
he’s all over the place and needs to settle down, he’s putting up 16-18 PER’s while doing it at like age 19 and 20. That’s pretty impressive. If a guy with those physical tools and that production settles down, which is likely as he matures, he could be something very special.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
I would do this trade if we could not get ET for #4 and #23
In Randolph we could have a poor mans KG which I think is better then what K-love can give us. Plus if we are going to be a running team we need guys like Randolph on the team.
Rubio
just said he won’t be here til 2011. Gotta love the spin on the ESPN article, making it sound AGAIN like he doesn’t want to be here. All he said was that he’s “open to everything”, and they twist his words. Read the article, its ridiculous.
Not only that, it isn’t like he has a choice…
It is such a conventional storyline: The young star wants to go the bright lights of a big city like NY or LA. I think it reflects a lazy media more than anything else. Sad and disappointing. Another reason why I prefer to get my analysis from a site like this.
I don't know;
I responded to you on the other thread, but I think it takes a pretty willful refusal to accept the evidence to suggest that he’s excited about the Timberwolves. I think it’s pretty clear that he is not, and would rather go somewhere else. Hopefully, that isn’t enough for him to refuse to come, and I don’t think it will be.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions
I still think his desire to play in the NBA ultimately trumps
His non-desire to play for MN. And once he gets here, then everthing changes. Sure, maybe he hates it in MN, but I bet if you asked a lot of pros, they’d say they wouldn’t live in the place where they were drafted if it weren’t for work. Then the place grows on them. This is especially magnified when you’re dealing with a foreign player. And frankly, Ricky needs to grow a sac, play for the team that drafted him, become a free agent and then move if he still hates it. And if he wants to cry about it, then he can stay in Spain and cry. It sucks for Wolves, but clearly Kahn’s not going to trade him.
I agree
I think he’ll come, and then it either works out or it doesn’t. I certainly would not trade him in almost any circumstances.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions
If there's no lockout in 2011, he'll play for the Wolves
and I’ll laugh when Sports Guy has to go to the home opener.
Givony from DraftExpress tweets about a Love for Randolph swap
Anthony Randolph for Kevin Love? Heard some chatter about that from a pretty good source. Makes sense for both teams. Need to dig a bit more
Nor I
I like Randolph, but not at that cost. Too many injuries.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Well
At some point we need to balance our frontcourt physical profiles and skill-sets. With Pekovic, Jefferson, and Love as assets we hold; Darko waiting on the wings; and Cousins being the most likely guy to fall to #4, something has to give. I’d rather it not be Love as well, but I can see the merit in doing this deal.
by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
I understand the reasoning, I just think it’s bad value.
We Are the Washington Generals
by Eric in Madison on Jun 4, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I just think at some point
Kahn is going to have to take a risk with a guy that has tremendous upside. It might be sticking with Cousins at #4. It might be trading Love for Randolph. It might be something else….I wonder what people would have said about this trade right after Summer League last year?
by Rascal Flatts on Jun 4, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I like this deal
Better than Love + #4 for Randolph + #6. If we take Cousins at #4, he projects to be the same beast on the boards that KLove is with size to defend his position. I must admit that this deal is something I may be able to support.
wow...
if you’re open to that trade perhaps I need to change my mind.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions
I feel the same way
Randolph’s ceiling is immense AND he’s a potentially excellent fit next to DMC.
Is it a gamble? Yes. Do you win in the NBA with top end talent? Also a yes. If it pays off and we wind up one of the best front courts in the league, one that could contend easily with the Lakers/Blazers of the world, then Kahn would look like a genius.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
Me neither. I’m not a huge Love fan, but he’s a known quantity…too much risk with AR IMO.
by TWolvesFanInLA on Jun 4, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions
That’s tough. On the one hand, if they’re going to deal Love for a more contemporary/conventional player, Randolph’s not the worst option. On the other, at the very least those two players are a push right now. Randolph’s got the higher ceiling and is much more athletic, but if he doesn’t reach it or ends up just getting hurt too much, bad deal. Fatalistic Wolves fan I am, I just imagine Love and Curry developing into a devastating high screen-and-roll tandem and feeling the way I do when I watch Brandon Roy.
And if we’re still including the pick swap, that’s worse. Minny gives up the better (IMO), more durable player and the better draft pick. That’s as of Summer 2010, of course, and things could change. But that just seems like way too much to sacrifice for what would essentially be a stylistic facelift (e.g., Love and Cousins for Randolph and Johnson).
I don’t know. I was intrigued when I thought it was #4 for Randolph and #6. I don’t like that Love’s now in the picture.
Actually, now that you mention it...
I might just jump to the Warriors if Love gets shipped there for Randolph. Curry and Love pick-and-roll tandem at last!
New news on Rumor
Looks like Randolph value is greater than Loves. Way more perceived upside. Warriors may want Love and the #4 for Randolph. Apparently TWolves want Randolph BADLY!!!! More than Canis Hoopis realizes!
Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!
Why don't you read the article first you trolling homer
If I’m Riley, I’m asking for Kevin Love in any Randolph deal. Ideally, I’d want Love AND Randolph–that’d be a very nice 4-5 combo in stretches–but that’s not happening.
So it’s Love for Randolph, with the Warriors having to throw in C.J. Watson (if he agrees to a sign-and-trade as a restricted free agent) to balance the salaries.
If I’m the Warriors, I probably ask for a flop of the 4 and 6 picks, but I doubt Minnesota does that.
Kawakami is a rumor monger. The same guy that told us Monta Ellis would demand a trade if the Warriors drafted a guard is behind that column. As is the usual case with local columnists, nothing to see here. Of course, since it’s Kawakami, less than nothing to see here.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
Is Givony a rumor monger?
I rarely see him post trade rumors on his twitter so the fact he did leaves me to believe this more than just a local GSW beat reporter driving this.
No no no, not the trade rumor itself, that I do believe is being discussed, just all the added bits that he seems to enjoy tossing in and hoping someone takes them as fact. Things like “So it’s Love for Randolph with the Warriors throwing in CJ Watson after a sign and trade” and “Randolph is worth Love and a pick switch.” It sounds like Randolph is being shopped to the Wolves, and beyond that, it doesn’t sound like anyone really knows much in the way of details. Odds are, nothing’s happening, and any of the TK suggestions are even less likely. Wait and see is all we can do at this point.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
its clear in reading the articles that
the TWolves are the ones starting this dialogue. They have a real hardon for AR and have since last year. Time for them to pony up, and pay full value. AR & 6 for Love & 4 is the fair equitable deal and works for both teams.
Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!
by StinkyFingers on Jun 4, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
It really isn’t a fair and equitable deal. It’s highway robbery for the Warriors. This is a four player draft and the Warriors just swapped out a somewhat effective, but potential filled Anthony Randolph and (probably) a 23 year old solid player in Wes Johnson for an ultra productive Kevin Love and an ultra productive Demarcus Cousins. That is a huge victory for Golden State.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
did he just quote the article
that was written by a hack as adding clarity?
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions
How is it clear that it's the Timberwolves? Seems like mutual interest to me.
You need to stop presenting opinions as fact. Also, being so insistent and almost pushy about how fair the possible trade you’re presenting is – and exaggerating Randolph’s abilites while discrediting Love’s – makes it seem pretty obvious that you think the trade is better for your team. Playing off what is generally seen as a pretty unfair trade for the T-Wolves (even by other GSOM posters’ standards) as fair or “good enough” seems pretty disingenuous to me.
Funny
That fans get so worked up about another fan’s ignorance. It’s not like he makes the trades or his opinion really matters. Kahn isn’t going to be convinced by some guy named StickyFingers that he sould make a stupid deal..
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
It seems like the columnist is speculating Love-for-Randolph straight up. He also seems to have sentiment most here do: Randolph has better upside, but Love so far’s the better producer.
Also, Tim Kawakama alert! Keep in mind last time this dude was connecting the dots between the Dubs and the Wolves, he had KG going to Golden State for Brandon Wright, Andres Biedrins, and filler. It all hinged on that weird draft day trade where the Dubs gave up Jason Richardson for the #8 pick, and a malfunctioning telephone or two that caused Mullen to guess incorrectly on which player the Wolves wanted drafted in GState’s spot. Maybe there was something to it (and parts of the circuslike story do seem, well, McHaleian), but obviously in the end it was a moot point.
What's crazy
Is that that same sort of trade that he presented for KG could be bandied about for Al nowadays (or when Al was healthy). While that Al hypothetical is probably a bad trade for the Warriors, it still says something about how bad of an idea the KG-Warriors trade was at the time that it could plausibly be discussed for Al at any point.
Obviously it depends on what the final deal looks like, if there is one
but these rumors help to confirm my biggest fear: that Kahn and Rambis have utterly failed to properly evaluate Kevin Love’s worth on the basketball court. It seemed that this was a problem during the season, as Rambis cut Love’s minutes despite the fact that he was, you know, the team’s best player.
Nobody on the roster is or should be untouchable, but a deal like this-straight up for AR, is just not acceptable value in my opinion.
We Are the Washington Generals
I have to admit though
that of every single Love trade suggestion that I have heard, this one takes the cake as being the most feasable as a core trade.
A Darko Fan since 2010!
by TheEvilProfessor on Jun 4, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly, I like Love a lot, but this solves
the Love/Al death match and gets us a decent return and more importantly someone with a higher ceiling, which is what a 15 win team needs. And we’re still in the top 4.
I think if Love goes
it signals that there is nothing of remote value being offered for Jefferson, and Kahn figures he might as well get something for somebody, and hopefully Al will either improve enough to help the team or bump up his tradeworthiness. Otherwise, it’s going to be a long three years under the weight of that contract.
Not really
You’re way overestimating the negative impact of Al’s deal. He might be slightly overpaid for 3 years, but he’s not going to be an immovable object. He’ll be a 25-28 year old 20/10 big guy. If he clearly loses a step due to his injury, then maybe you’ll be right, but I think he’ll be back to being fairly productive.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story.
Agree with EiM
How this 15 win team could actually take a step backward I have no idea. But they’re trying.
In three years we may be as good as Memphis
by Son of Gerald Green on Jun 4, 2010 7:00 PM CDT reply actions
Trade rumors are also fascinating trial balloons. Let’s suppose this rumor has some merit. If Love has more value in the marketplace than AR, Kahn’s phone should be ringing off the hook with offers from other GMs saying “Are you crazy? I’ll give you player X, who is clearly better than AR, for Love.”
Just a Fan
We need him to determine the merit and parameters of this discussion.
We need a Just A Fan alert like the Bat signal.
this pretty much says it all
Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!
Bleacher Report?
Not to say the website doesn’t have its merits, but it’s hardly a place to go for reputable sources and investigative journalism, or even very good op/eds. It’s essentially the same sort of thing you’d find on some fan’s personal blog or a random fanpost. That article is 100 percent some Warrior fan’s opinion, and I don’t see how that really adds to this discussion if he’s not participating in it over here.
On a side note, the guy fits in a lot of questionable points in a sentence where he say that Aminu is Igu"a"dala “without the shot.” Iguodala isn’t a great shooter in the first place, and he’s a swingman. Aminu is a larger combo forward that doesn’t have the passing skills that Iggy does. That’s also before he accuses Stern of telling the refs to “fix” the series so that it goes to 6 or 7 games, and after he says that Randolph is Golden State’s most talented player since Rick Barry. Not the best guy to cite, in my eyes.
Randolph isn’t even the most talented current Warrior. That article was awful—an embarassment.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
why all the bitter negativity? Randolph is a young stud. Are you really a Warrior fan?
by skeptic con urqeul on Jun 7, 2010 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions
You can be a Warriors fan without being a homer. I’d take Steph Curry 11 times out of 10 over Randolph. Randolph is productive, but he’s nowhere near the most talented Warrior since Rick Barry and there are certainly players besides LeBron James that I’d be comfortable trading Randolph for. That article was ridiculous.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
skeptic? Is Cap’n giving you a hard time too? He’s oh so negative!
Set a record by getting banned for the 8th time!
After rehab I saw the light and promise to be kinder and gentler!
Probation is a very slippery slope!
by StinkyFingers on Jun 7, 2010 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions


















