How to love Love
In 1998/99 a 22 year old power forward taken with the 5th pick in the 1995 draft led a 25-win team to their 3rd 1-and-done.
In 2010/11 a 22 year old power forward taken with the 5th pick in the 2008 draft led a 17-win team to a comfy spot in the lottery.
The 98/99 team posted a -1 mark on its expected w/l record (26-24) in a strike shortened season with a SRS or -0.17 and an Ortg/Drtg differential of +0.4.
The 10/11 team posted a -7 mark on its expected w/l record (24-58) in a full season with a SRS of -5.97 and an Ortg/Drtg differential of -6.9.
The 90-s era 22 year old power foward posted a WS/48 of .146, a PER of 22.4, oreb% of 9.7, tov% of 12, usg% of 27.8, and 4.2 fta/36 minutes.
The 00-s era 22 year old power forward posted a WS/48 of .210, a PER of 24.3, oreb% of 13.7, tov% of 11.1, usg of 22.9, and 6.9 fta/36 minutes.
The 90s-era 22 year old power forward would be league MVP in the WCF within 5 years. The 00s-era 22 year old power forward is on the road to...
(Thoughts on how to build around the 00s-era 22 year old power forward below the fold.)
The first thing we need to do with comparing the 22 year old versions of Kevin Garnett and Kevin Love is to look at who they played with.
The 25-win 98/99 strike-shortened Wolves had some decent players. They had a grand total of 7 players above or within 5% of a .100 ws/48 and 500+ minutes played: Terrell Brandon, KG, Dean Garrett, Joe Smith, Dennis Scott, Smitch, and Stephon Marbury. Granted, the team had to deal with a shortened season and the whole Starbury mess, but this was a team filled with capable players. Lower down the totem pole, Malik Sealy and Bobby Jackson played a combined total of 1672 minutes.
All in all, Kevin Garnett was surrounded by 5721 minutes of average to above average production spread out over 50 games. That's 2.38 players worth of solid production per game, on average.
The 2010/11 Wolves were a masterpiece of ineptitude. Not only were they an underperforming bunch, but they were an underperforming collection of misfits that produced at historically low (comical?) levels.
Last year's Wolves had a grand total of 2 players above or within 5% of a .100 ws/48 and 500+ mpg: Kevin Love and Anthony Tolliver.
All in all, Kevin Love was surrounded by 1362 minutes of average to above average production spread out over 82 games. That's .346 players worth of solid production per game, on average.
Just for kicks and giggles, let's throw in Luke Ridnour. He posted a .089 ws/48 and a 15 PER. With Luke in the mix, Kevin Love was surrounded by 3521 minutes of average to above average production spread out over 82 games. That's .894 players worth of solid production per game, on average.
Last year, Kevin Love was an isthmus on a peninsula on an island in an island continent on a planet far, far away. He was a one-man army. He had no one approaching the quality of the original Stop-n-Pop, Joe Smith, Starbury, Smitch or Dean Garrett. He was coached by a buffoon. Yet, he went absolutely nuts and showed himself to be a player well worth building a team around.
How did the KG-era Wolves become a 58 win contender? Is this story instructive for our current crop of puppies? While all the rage around the league has been about the "OKC model", hasn't the real model for success been staring us in the face since 03/04? Is there such a thing as a "model" in the first place?
Let's first look at how the 22 win 98 Wolves morphed into the 58 win WCF squad that was within a Sam Cassell injury of winning it all. Let's break things down between the trade/free agent road and the draft road:
TRADES/FREE AGENCY
98 off season:
- Released Cherokee Parks, Terry Porter, and Tom Gugliotta
- Released DeJuan Wheat
- Traded Zeljko Rebraca, Michael Williams, and 2000 1st round pick (Morris Peterson) to the Raptors; the Denver Nuggets traded Dean Garret and Bobby Jackson to the Wolves; the Nuggets traded a 99 1st round pick to the Raptors; and the Raptors traded Chauncey Billups and Tyson Wheeler to the Denver Nuggets.
- Signed Mikki Moore as a free agent
- Signed Troy Hudson as a FA
- Signed Malik Sealy as a FA
- Signed Joe Smith as a FA
- Waived Mikki Moore
- Waived T-Hud
- Wolves traded Chris Carr, Bill Curley and Starbury to the Nets; Wolves traded Paul Grant to the Bucks; Bucks traded SnP to Wolves; Bucks traded Eliot Perry to the Nets; Nets traded Sam Cassell and Chris Gatling to the Bucks; Nets traded Brian Evans and 99 1st rounder (Wally) to the Wolves.
- Signed Dennis Scott to a 10-day contract
- Signed Bill Curley for the remainder of the season
- Waived Brian Evans
- Signed James Robinson to 2 10-day contracts
- Signed Dennis Scott for the remainder of the season.
- Released Dennis Scott, Reggie Jordan, and Bill Curley
- Signed Todd Day as a FA
- Signed Chauncey Billups as a FA
- Signed Reggie Slater as a FA
- Signed LaPhonso Ellis as a FA
- Signed Sam Jacobson as a FA
- Signed John Coker as a FA (waived 4 days later)
- Waived Todd Day
- Signed Felipe Lopez as a FA
- Signed Mo Evans as a FA
- Signed Joe Smith as a FA
- Signed Gary Trent as a FA
- Waived Bill Curley
- Traded Dean Garrett and a 07 2nd rounder to the Warriors for Marc Jackson
- Signed Robert Pack to a 10 day contract, and then for the rest of the season
- SMitch retired
- T-Hud signed as a FA
- Kendall Gill signed as a FA
- Randy Livingston signed as a FA
- Reggie Slater signed as a FA
- Waived Mo Evans
- Signed Rod Strickland as a FA
- Waived Randy Livingston
- Waived Reggie Slater
- Signed Mike Wilks
- Waived Igor Rakocevic
- Traded Anthony Peeler and Joe Smith to the Bucks for Sam Cassell and Ervin Johnson
- Signed michael Olowokandi as a free agent
- Wolves traded Marc Jackson to the Sixers; Wolves traded Terrell Brandon tot he Hawks; Hawks traded Glenn Robinson and a 06 2nd round pick (Boobie Gibson) to the Sixers; Knicks traded Latrell Sprewell to the Wolves; Sixers traded Randy Holcomb and a 07 1st round draft pick to the Hawks; Sixers traded Keith Van Horn to the Knicks
- Signed Fred Hoiberg as a FA
- Signed Mark Madsen as a FA
- Signed Quincy Lewis as a FA
- Signed Keith McLeod as a FA
- Waived Keith McLeod
- Signed Keith McLeod as a FA
- Signed Trenton Hassell as a FA
- Signed Oliver Miller as a FA
- Waived Quincy Lewis
- Signed Anthony Goldwire to a 10-day contract
- Waived Keith McLeod
- Released Anthony Goldwire
- Signed Darrick Martin to 2 10-day contracts, and then the rest of the season
- Drafted Wally Szcerbiak with the 6th pick
- Drafted William Avery with the 14th pick
- Drafted Luis Bullock with the 42nd pick
- Sold Bullock to the Magic for cash
June, 00
- Drafted Igor Rakocevic with the 51st pick
- Drafted Loren Woods with the 46th pick
- Drafted Marcus Taylor with the 52nd pick
- Drafted Ndudi Ebi with the 26th pick
- Drafted Rick Rickert with the 55th pick
- Drafted Blake Stepp with the 58th pick
- Sam Cassell, trade
- Spree, trade
- The Mayor, FA
- Trenton Hassell, FA
- Gary Trent, FA
- Wally, draft
- Kandi, FA
- Madsen, FA
- T-Hud, FA
- Ervin Johnson, trade
- Oliver Miller, FA
- McLeod, FA
- Martin, FA
- Lewis, FA
- Goldwire, FA
- Ndudi Ebi, draft
In 1998/99 a 22 year old power forward taken with the 5th pick in the 1995 draft led a 22-win team to a comfy spot in the lottery.
In 1998/99 a 22 year old power forward taken with the 5th pick in the 1995 draft led a 25-win team to their 3rd 1-and-done.
Expected w/l numbers for 98/99 have been updated to -1 instead of -4.
476 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hope the impending class action suit
against the Wolves on behalf of season ticket holders allows for several days of David Kahn sitting on the witness stand, and as each personnel move is listed, he is given a sworn chance to respond with his rationale for making the move, what he told the media and fans at the time, and how effective he believes the eventual move was.
PD Girl gets to be the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, and Eric in Madison is brought in to yell “WHY ALL THE ROOKIES??!!”
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Waste of a good actor.
Bradley Whitford as Kahn, I say!
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
Mostly I was enjoying the idea of Cranston inevitably playing some scenes in his tighty whiteys.
You know he’d go there on draft night. No great actor goes so readily to “underpants vulnerability” as a device. Kahn in the HBO version would hold post-draft press conferences behind the little covered table…. And from the rear, we see his socks pulled up unevenly. So telling.
"Opinion ...a confession."
by feral on Dec 30, 2011 11:00 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Dwill for Martin, money be damned?
I’m by no means a trade-proposer (I generally hate the posts, due to their motivations but whatever), but I just .. can’t watch Wes anymore.
Good writeup, by the way. K-Love is some sort of hyper-productive low-usage mutant, the likes of which I don’t know the league has ever seen and struggles to evaluate.
I don't know what it would take to get Martin
but it seems like he might be get-able, and I’d be disappointed if we didn’t try.
Very, very good questions
SNP, nice write-up. Two contrasting philosophies come to mind:
Youth with potential vs. Established productive veterans
Talented players who are redundant vs. Roster balancing
What is the best way toward a championship?
OKC started with the talented young players: Durant, Westbrook, Green…
Then did roster balancing / brought in veterans: Green for Perkins
Of course they haven’t won anything yet…
MN starts with: Love, Rubio, Williams
Will they roster balance?
Will the wolves wait a season under Adelman before roster balancing / bringing in more veterans? Should they?
Sorry if this is redundant…
I think the big thing..
…(and one I should have spent more time on in the piece) is that there is no such thing as a philosophy or system, only people who can or cannot do their jobs.
I’ll go back to the well with this FDR quote:
But while they prate of economic laws, men and women are starving. We must lay hold of the fact that economic laws are not made by nature. They are made by human beings.
There’s no such thing as the OKC model. Sam Presti is just good at what he does and he got lucky to land a superstar performer. There is no 1 philosophy that works. There is no “right” way forward other than focusing on the things that make the whole experience as enjoyable as possible for the fans. Winning now by whatever means possible will always be better than winning later according to some sort of philosophy or ideology.
Reduce suffering, live in the here and now, surround yourself with smart and talented people. That’s the “plan”. I’m hoping Team Adelman takes care of a large chunk of this equation.
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 29, 2011 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I have some hope for Team Adelman as well.
They have some tough choices to make. As you said, Rubio and Williams still probably have a lot of trade value. But very good to great players on rookie contracts are a wonderful thing to have. So how low are you willing to go when you shop for a veteran in return for one or both of them? That’s the kind of decision front offices need to earn their money on.
My opinion is that we should keep Rubio, who looks like some version of a star to me, and look to move Williams, who doesn’t seem like a bust, but at the very least has some fit issues on this team. I would hope that between Williams and everything else that isn’t Love or Rubio, we could get a third amigo. Then we fill in with Chuck Hayes-style FA additions to add some competence around the edges.
Anyway, I haven’t said anything terribly new. Here’s hoping for some good trades during the year, some luck with Williams and Lee, and a good relationship between Adelman and Love.
Nice post.
You might be happy to know...
….that this book has been the straw that made me become a win now kind of guy. Hooray economics!
I’m with you on the hoping to keep Rubio bit. I think he’s a demonstrated pro and that he has an elite talent: distribution/ball skills. I really wonder if they could figure out a way to send a Williams/Johnson led package to NOLA that could get Kaman and Gordon in return. I don’t know how the salaries would work out (and Kaman has to be in a separate trade) but I’d even throw in a future 1st to get that done. As long as the league is still being crazy by thinking they can keep the team in NOLA with a local owner, I think getting them multiple young players with money off the cap is a workable approach.
Especially if
Gordon’s agent makes it known that he’s not staying in NOLA at any price.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
the wolves could even throw another one of his clients a bone
trade for oj and give him a 2nd contract. i’d do it to make that nola trade happen.
I'd really like to see them go after Mayo regardless.
He seems highly available (almost dealt twice for Josh McRoberts) and he’d be a huge upgrade over Wes.
Doesn't Memphis desperately need depth up ront?
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 12:39 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Sigh
Hit return while in the subject line.
Anyway, I think they were thin even before Artbir went down. I wonder if AT could net us Mayo..
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 12:40 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Artbir = Arthur
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 12:41 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Ah, yes . .
“Agent to the Shooting Guards”
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I suppose
it’s a good area in which to specialize, considering how apparent few capable ones exist in the world.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Of "Fab Five" fame
for my second Mitch Albom reference of the day.
Must have ready that book a half-dozen times in junior high.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
He's still
got a few million to spare.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
You no doubt
caught the ESPN documentary, too?
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Yes, enjoyed that...
but it was really too bad Webber didn’t participate. He was obviously the central character.
Watching Rose lose to his buddy Voshon at The Barn was a favorite hoops-watching memory as a kid. Of course, it was the Blue #5 that I asked for, for Christmas.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
Jalen is an amazing guy
to listen to. Super introspective, good perspective—I know it was his movie, but he made up for a lot of what was lost with Webber’s petulant refusal to participate.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Yes, agree.
He’s got an interesting life story, to say the least.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
As a Spartan season ticket holder during the Fab 5 years,
I’d like to tell them all to go f*** themselves. Jalen can do it twice.
I'm on board with that but
Would they do that deal knowing that it will likely greatly devalue one of their best assets (our pick)?
by MoreJuice on Dec 29, 2011 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I'll have to check out that book.
I need to get a Kindle. I got one for my wife for Christmas, and she loves it. Then I’d need to find time to read, though.
I got a Nook for Christmas, and it's great.
The only problem I have now is deciding whether to read on the device or to try to pare down my physical book backlog (standing at about 90 books).
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
Our immediate and slightly extended family...
…has an ipad, Kindle, Kindle Fire, and a Nook Tablet. In terms of parring down the gadgets, the ipad is the cream of the crop for everything. It is the best e-reader, tablet, music player, video player, whatever. The kindle is the best e-ink reader, and the Nook Tablet is the best value tablet. The Kindle Fire is kind of disappointing. The video isn’t that good and it doesn’t have a freaking volume button.
I need a laptop and an iPod Touch (or a smart phone) for work,
which makes the iPad a little too much of a luxury for me, but they are very cool. The Kindles have gotten to be so cheap that it seems like kind of a no-brainer to get one and throw it in the work bag.
Have you checked out the NBA app for the iPad? I’ve been watching games through it on my iPod, and even that’s pretty cool. $40 for League Pass with no restrictions on the number of teams. It’s a tiny screen, but the resolution is so good that it actually works pretty well.
I have the iPad app and it's pretty good
It’s really nice because you can take it to the gym, prop it up in the basement while doing housework after the kids go to bed, and it works on Apple TV, as well.
The Apple TV part would be especially nice.
The benefit of the iPod for me is that if my kids are playing nicely, I can watch a game anywhere in the house without having the TV on or dragging around my laptop. It’s very sneaky that way.
Exactly
Also, I can volunteer for Honey Do List duties while taking League Pass with me. It’s a win-win for everybody.
You can also have
an iPod nano implanted right on your optic nerve, so that you can appear to be maintaining eye contact with your wife while you catch the Plays of the Day.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
It seems it's
almost here . . .

Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
am I correct
in that LP has some sort of built-in protection against you using A/V connections to send your iPad signal to your TV?
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 12:02 PM CST up reply actions
I am not quite techy enough to know this
But how could they stop you from using your TV as a monitor if you have an hdmi/dvi out on your graphics card?
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 1:01 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I sort of think a LP FAQ is kind of in order...look for it shortly in Fan Posts
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
iPad is gonna be a real stretch on the budget
I can’t forsee an Apple TV anytime soon, unfortunately
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
I got the Nook Simple Touch
My brother and sister-in-law have Kindle Touches. In head-to-head operation, they’re pretty similar, though the Nook moves faster from page to page. I thought about the tablet, but I don’t need all of that. I have other devices that can do all of the things I need to do, and I don’t need more distractions.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 4:34 PM CST up reply actions
I was disappointed in the "lend book" feature.
Apparently the authors squashed any value that might have. Very few books can be lent to other NOOK owners.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
A lot of writers
are getting very fed up with the Authors Guild’s idiot anti-ebook lobbying.
But on the other hand, it’s really hard to see why ebooks should be lent, assuming that they’re priced reasonably which none of them are thanks to the buggy whip making publishing houses.
Correr como un lobo.
Decided to buy the book
Based off the Amazon reviews and your recommendation. Thanks for that.
I would target Okafor/Gordon for Johnson/Williams/Beasley/AR/WhoeverTheyWantButRubio.
Michael Beasley is a Small Forward. Derrick Williams is a Power Forward.
I like this trade
a heck of a lot more than the “everything but love” for Westbrook.
Rubio could make Eric Gordon unbelievable.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I don't think
the league likes the Wolves enough to push that trade through.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I probably would have agreed with you pre-lockout
Post lockout it seems feasible Taylor could get something out of Stern for still supporting the team, owners-wise.
I keep forgetting Okafor is down there
I still can’t believe the Laker trade was turned down. Martin/Odom/Scola/Dragic/Okafor is a pretty damn talented starting 5….for basketball reasons, no less.
Don't u think NOLA got a better deal?
I’m Mr. Potential, true but I’d take what they got.
Gordon/Aminu/Kaman plus 2 picks is a pretty good haul for a franchise that wasn’t making the playoffs either way.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Wasn't making the playoffs either way?
I think you misread the amount of talent they had coming their way in that first deal. Instead of competing for the playoffs this season with 4 really good starting level players (far more than our favorite team, btw), they get to suffer through young player potential and cap space (other things Wolves fans are familiar with).
I've debated between the deals plenty
And I don’t want to start that debate again, I’m tired of it. I liked the deal they got better than the LAL deal, but I think we can all reasonably agree that the LAL deal would have put them in the playoff race for the next couple of years.
Had they got Gasol, I'd feel differently
I don’t know what to think about a trade where you trade the best player in the deal and don’t even wind up with the 2nd best player in the deal
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Borderline? Yes.
I would have a tough time seeing them being better than either Denver or Portland for the 7th and 8th seeds…and hell, I kind of like what G.S. is doing too….
They’d have been in the mix to lose to OKC in the first round that is forsure. but with all older players they can really only sustain that level for so long until either they start to decline, or some younger team inevitably passes them
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I just don't see it
Are they better than Portland? I’d say no.
Denver? Again I’d probably say no.
What do I know? But I see the 8th or 9th best team in the west with that club. No young talent coming up, no draft picks really (unless, did they get the Minn pick in that deal?).
I know a lot of people here are burnt out of rebuilding projects….but I mean what other choice does a small market team have?
Charlotte is a team that tried to do their best to field a competitive team after years of poor drafting, so they spent money to get guys like Jackson in there to salvage what they could of their situation. But there 4 year stretch of drafting in the teens without really anything significant playoff wise is crippling for them now as they look at a fairly untalented roster of role guys.
The Lakers trade may have delayed the inevitable….but at some point there was going to be a nasty stretch of years for that N.O. team….at least in the Clippers deal they have a young star to build around
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
What other choice does a small market team have?
Aside from assembling 4 good starters, competing for the playoffs in cruddy basketball town, and possibly making the playoffs while fielding as good of a product as possible for its current paying customers?
Screw rebuilding projects. Get what you can while you can get it. I’d never recommend this shit to another fanbase ever. Never blow it up and never bank on the draft. Get as many good people as possible and make sure you have the best draft operation possible, but never bank on future picks over currently good players.
At some point it's going to happen though
You can delay the inevitable all you want. But Scola and Odom are in there 30s…Kevin Martin is a jump shooting shooting guard, Okafor is older and just pretty average.
You might be sniffing the playoffs for a few years but then you are right back to being bad and you don’t have an Eric Gordon to build around.
I guess it is what it is. I’ve heard enough Gm’s on the radio or NBA today or whatever say “you don’t want to be .500” to believe that.
But you do what you do the best you can do it, Snp. And I’ll do the same, maybe the Wolves can learn from us
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I don't believe in the small market argument at all
This is a false causal relationship. Admittedly some players want to play where the bling is, but others want to play where home is. Wallace was distraught to be traded from Charlotte to Portland. KD wants to stay in OKC. Indiana is suddenly loaded. San Antonio isn’t actually a ‘big market’. Utah was a contender because of personnel and winning tradition. Small market doesn’t mean anything at all. And if it did, between St Paul and Mpls, we would be one of the larger than average markets for the NBA, even with our other sports franchises.
Every team should have the same plan — win now, win even more later. Ball don’t lie; everything else does. Draft picks are overvalued; all-stars are not.
by monkeywolf on Dec 29, 2011 5:24 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
48 minutes
all 15 players
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
How is a team supposed to acquire an all-star without a draft pick?
The Kevin Garnett era, amongst other things, is noted for it’s lack of draft picks in general…and proper use of them.
It’s surprising what a draft pick can do.
SnP said himself “i’d focus on having the best draft operation as possible.”
This really should be franchise emphasis no.1 no matter where you draft. It has been the problem of the Wolves for over a decade
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Note:
Want to be clear I’m not taking SnP out of context. He made that quote within the framework of a point about always trying to put the best players out there
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
well, everyone drafts
and you gotta have draft picks, but draft picks are much more useful when you package them to get Chris Paul than they are when you attempt to draft Chris Paul.
Speaking of which, now that clippergedon has morphed into…Hornet Hell? I don’t know — what do we call that draft pick now?
The best franchises
are ultimately the ones that draft the best.
That’s why I put a big emphasis on the draft in what I want to see, that’s why I get stoaked for DWill that’s why i’m already petitioning the Wolves to look into getting a pick in the 8-15 range so they can get Austin Rivers.
I realize you gotta have the right people in place or else the draft is meaningless….but the most consistent franchises are the ones that draft the best.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
don't confuse draft position with drafting well
The wolves have had excellent draft position but have not drafted well. The Lakers get one lottery pick in ten years (?) and select Bynum.
San Antonio picks up Tony and Manu in the late first and second rounds. Indiana selects Paul George, etc, etc.
Get good players, invest a ton of money in scouting and advanced stats and you’ll have a winning program.
F*ck tanking.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
I agree. Have I been in favor of tanking?
I don’t believe this is the case
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
In the same way
that being good at drafting is not equal with having draft positioning
I don’t think being in favor of potential/young talent is equal with tanking. I’m all for getting the best young talent possible and had we done that we wouldn’t be in the need to tank.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
even the spurs
got lucky.
they traded their 1st rounder for the rights for the immortal Gordan Giricek (who wasn’t a bad pick for a 2nd rounder) before they drafted Manu.
At the time of the draft, they valued Giricek more than Manu, they just got lucky that manu was as good as he was.
(they did pick up Parker with their 1st pick, so that looks like pretty accurate scouting on their part)
bottom line: they drafted Manu
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
disagree
but it’s a pointless argument. Best franchises recognize talent the best through draft and trade. Boston’s big three — two came by trade (Rondo was drafted by the suns). Lakers didn’t daft Kobe, Gasol, Artest, or Odom. Mavericks didn’t draft Dirk, Tyson Chandler, Terry, etc.
I think if you trade for a player during the draft
that counts as having a draft pick. Cause you have identified a rookie prospect that you like and have manufactured a way to select him
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
While the Lakers didn't draft Kobe
Kobe sure as Sh*t chose the Lakers. Kobe ending up with the Lakers was a lot of work by him and his agent to make it happen leading up to the draft. much the same way that Manning ended up in New York even though they didn’t darft him.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Dec 29, 2011 10:36 PM CST up reply actions
Kobe Elwayed his way to the Lakers.
The Hornets didn’t call his bluff.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 11:05 PM CST up reply actions
Apologies if someone mentioned this below
But Stern will not endorse anything that devalues the MN pick. If a deal like this were to materialize it would have to be after the season. Then NOH can see if Williams is worth it, suppress the value of the ppick and see if there is likely to be a replacement for EG available where they pick.
Btw having two picks in this draft is going to be great for them. The abundance of good SG prospects could make this a possibility imo. Williams + Beal + Kidd-Gilchrist etc. Is a great young core.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 12:32 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I watched Beal
last night. He was not . . . outstanding in this particular game.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Good to know
Keep watching and we’ll see how we feel by season’s end.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 1:07 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I'm probably
missing something, and it was just one game (albeit against a cruddy Rutgers team). Plus I had a hard time telling most of the Florida players apart, even on a big screen in HD (#notrayciss).
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Happy New Year to you.
i recorded that game for later viewing while on the treadmill. But watching really good NBA teams and players can be somewhat depressing to a Wolves fan.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Thanks, you too. (spoiler alert below in case you have yet to see game and ignored internet (ha!) and ESPN for past 18 hours)
Something (okay, everything) didn’t feel right about Vinsanity hitting that game winner. Durant fixed it.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
I stopped watching at 0:46 to go
when Westbrook hit the shot to go up 5 and Dallas called timeout. I never came back, and was surprised to read about a Durant game winner later on. D’oh!
Crazy how the NBA timeout rule...
allows those kinds of finishes with some frequency.
For every Bryce Drew or Christian Laettener in college, there must be a dozen buzzer-beaters in the NBA. Roy vs. the Rockets must’ve been the best I’ve ever seen. Also a TNT Thursday game.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
I don't like that part
of the NBA. The anticipation builds soooo much better when they have to get back to the other end of the court and make a play within a few seconds.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Did anybody watch the MSU-Indiana game the other night?
It might not have the same effect if you’re not a fan of either team, but it was the biggest roller coaster game I’ve seen. MSU looked like they’d win by 40 for the first stretch, then got killed for the whole middle of the game to find themselves down 9, then went on a 20-0 run to take back the lead and win. And the crowd was just awesome.
I know there are a lot of college hoops haters around here, but that game was more fun than any Wolves game I’ve seen in a long, long time. It’s nice to root for at least one competent team.
It's good for the Big Ten
and college basketball for Indiana to be good, especially if Bobby Knight is not involved in any form.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I was just talking about that with a guy at work,
it’s better for teams you dislike to be good so that it means something when you beat them. But I agree with (what I guess is) your less hostile version of that as well.
I'm well known
for my pacifism and tolerance.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
And his catchy theme song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNTBb1u6UGg
Follow me on Twitter @timallenonline
This type of comment
is often made by one whose team has been really successful in recent seasons. I’ve read/heard Badger fans make it about Gopher football (and now Indiana hoops) recently. Bill Simmons the Celtic fan has made it about the Knicks.
Less often do you read a Wolves fan describe how it’s good for the NBA for the Blazers/Thunder/Jazz/Nuggets to be good.
But yeah, it’s true about Hoosier Hoops. Catching a game at Assembly Hall a few years back (weird timing with the recent Sampson firing and half-mutiny of sorts with the interim coach) was something of a “bucket list” activity. Amazing history and aura about that place.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
I couldn't agree more with this
The best hope for the Wolves is Rubio becoming a Rondo/J-Kidd type of player that makes everyone on the team better. Assuming this team one day finds a legit defensive center, how would Love and Williams ever play meaningful minutes together? I would do this: 1. Offer Love the max (or slightly less if he will take it for the better of the team, doubtful, but maybe) assuming he accepts, deal Williams and some filler for the best 2 or 5 you can get that makes sense, then have Adelman mold it all together and let’s play. If he declines, he’s clearly leaving and you deal him right away and build around Williams, Rubio, and whatever you get in return for Love.
Yes
Williams has potential, is on an inexpensive rookie contract, and is a duplicative talent on the Wolves roster.
That he has potential and is on a rookie deal makes him the best trade asset (i.e., he will bring the most in return). That he is duplicative to the Wolves makes him more valuable to other teams than to Minnesota.
He needs to be traded this season before any shine wears off. If they keep him, then they cross their fingers and hope he becomes a top 10 stretch-PF and that Love can hold down the center position. Risky.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
by littleboxes on Dec 29, 2011 4:28 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
+1000
I like Williams and everything, but let’s balance the roster and capitalize on his value as a recent high draft pick.
"I’m hoping Team Adelman takes care of a large chunk of this equation."
I am too. And I totally agree with your write-up. But just because Team Adelman has the potential to be better than David Kahn at valuing assets and making the right moves, we still have to have the right assets to do anything. Your piece seems to point to the notion that we either sit on our hands and pray or trade Rubio and/or Williams (as Wes’ value seems to have tanked). I guess trading Barea down the line might be an option, too, as part of a deal for a real 2-guard. What other options exist? I agree the draft is a dead issue—not just philosophically, but because in any event we don’t have a pick til 2013 (Utah ain’t making the playoffs).
by HowManyFoulsOnShaq? on Dec 29, 2011 7:38 PM CST up reply actions
What does this mean?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:47 PM CST up reply actions
How long is the pick protected for?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:47 PM CST up reply actions
So basically Utah has to be better than bottom 9 in 2014
or we get a 2nd round pick?
That kinda sucks…
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
On the bightside
we probably should get that Memphis pick
that should have a little trade value?
Memphis/Utah picks for a 2011 first rounder could happen
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Nice article, depressing though
No way Rubio is dealt, and I’m fine with that. I want to see what he can do.
If they can get someone to bite on a Williams/Johnson/Ridnour package I’m cool with that. If Rubio hits, and I think he might, he will transform this franchise.
There is a theory
that the season the Wolves made it to the WCF was due to the foul rule changes. Which is also why Detroit won despite being vastly inferior to LA.
@JayKlinkhammer
jayklinkhammer.tumblr.com
"foul rule changes"
As in, “From now on, fouls have to be called fairly, even if one of the teams is from New York, Chicago, Boston, or Los Angeles, and the other team is not”?
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I don't see why
Detroit was “vastly inferior to L.A.”
by HowManyFoulsOnShaq? on Dec 29, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't see it that year before the Finals, either,
when the TV people held a lengthy Lakers celebration party before Game 1.
"Opinion ...a confession."
one of the more satisfying finals of my life
The lakers got just crushed.
by aarendsvark on Dec 30, 2011 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
and it was beautiful
Pek apologist
by running with Twolves (and scissors) on Dec 30, 2011 2:58 PM CST up reply actions
Well articulated.
KG + Spree + Cassell was the core that made it work, and by the time the latter two arrived, what-they-were was even better established that what-KG-was. If we’re going to compete soon, we need to move some of these could-bes for some already-ares. (Yes, even Pek.) The main hurdle, to me, is that our two positions of need are the positions of greatest need league-wide.
Being a homer makes it harder for me, because I get attached to all of our players, even the scrubs. It’s irrational, but that’s my flavor of fandom (and it’s why I usually don’t have much to say in trade-scenario discussions).
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
"Being a homer makes it harder for me"
Hang in there . . . apparently, It Gets Better.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I'm so tired of being picked on!
I shouldn’t joke—that’s a great cause. Oh, who am I kidding? Who do I think I am?
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
They tried throwing rookies and cheap veterans
against the wall to see what stuck, and they’ve basically ended up with Rubio and maybe Williams as potentially average-to-above-average NBA starters.
Between Adelman’s age, Kevin Love’s patience, and the lack of a lottery pick next year, that philosophy is done/over/out. Now they have to go after proven NBA starters, overpaying for them in both salary and trade pieces.
The problem with this chapter, though, is that when Rambis was the coach, other teams could look at underperforming Wolves and say, “Well, no sh*t. Look who his coach is.” With Adelman at the helm, he carries enough respect that I think teams will say, “If Adleman can’t improve the player and doesn’t want him, why should we?”
This is why the Wolves need to pretend that David Kahn is still in charge of personnel moves.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Good Thoughts
It may also be why the Wolves need to trade Williams because they justify it with the “He’s a PF” excuse versus guys like Wes and Beasley being non-justifiable.
Michael Beasley is a Small Forward. Derrick Williams is a Power Forward.
I know you'll hate this
but let’s have a little patience on trading Williams.
It’s the ultimate do we sell now for a 7 or hope we can sell later for a 9? Let’s just play this thing out. Even though he is a 4 his game is offensively rather complimentary to Love’s….let’s play this thing out. It’s tough. No reason to be patient…But I think it’s the right thing to do
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
How dare you ask for patience!
Williams has played two official games for us. The die is cast. He is what he will always be. It is written in the team’s by-laws that we MUST abandon our highest draft pick ever before he has even played one week for us in a strike-shortened season. It is forward thinking at its absolute max.
by ogishkemuncie on Dec 29, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions
I would have made the same argument before he ever played a game.
It’s not how he’s played, it’s that he’s a valuable asset in a trade and he’s less necessary (in my view) than Love or Rubio.
Exactly
This isn’t a brand new concept. When he wasn’t traded during the draft, it was, let’s wait and see after the lockout for how they address the roster imbalance. They’ve done nothing, the problem persists, and the draft can’t address the problem until 2013. Free Agency can help next off-season, but today, Williams is likely in a redundant position and while if he plays good he maintains value, it’s important we get some value for him before, gasp, poor play sinks his value, to address the roster imbalance.
I don’t know why “highest draft pick ever” should factor into things, I hope we aren’t making moves to improve the team based on directives from the marketing department. Winning basketball is going to drive fans/sponsorships more than the annual draft pick hype.
Michael Beasley is a Small Forward. Derrick Williams is a Power Forward.
What is more valuable though?
Derrick Williams the draft pick or Derrick Williams the proven prospect?
I’d argue if he proves this year he can be a legit 4 scorer his value goes way up, cause he has the best of both worlds=proven production+young talent
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:49 PM CST up reply actions
Or Derrick Williams the bust?
Anything can happen. It makes some sense to see what he can get them now. It’s Adelman & Co.‘s job to decide whether it’s a good deal.
by Madison Dan on Dec 29, 2011 11:04 PM CST up reply actions
Yes he could.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 11:11 PM CST up reply actions
A top 3 article since I've been coming here for hoops stuff
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Yes, very good, even for you
but it seems this video would have been an appropriate accompaniment.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
The last time Jack Black
and David Cross were good in anything.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Also,
Jack Black has never been more funny than he is annoying.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 6:37 PM CST up reply actions
I have all the AD
seasons on DVD still in the cellophane, waiting for me to become bedridden by some horrible ailment,. Since I’ve never watched the show, I’m almost looking forward to it!
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
If you can spare time from visiting CH...
..that show is more than worthwhile to watch. One of the best comedies ever.
Sorry. Can't.
My work here is too important.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
The meth here is good cookin
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
There's a big difference between...
…99.6% pure and 99.9% pure.
by Django Z on Dec 29, 2011 11:27 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
In which case
This site is definitely the blue crystal of Wolves sites.
Gary, you didn't kill your brother. Those gorillas did.
All this tells me that DWill needs to be traded ASAP
for a 2/3 of above average level. I have a fair bit of confidence that Rubio will perform pretty well this season and make playing fun for Kevin to convince him to stay IF the wolves can get a servicable wing player to make this team more complete and competitive as a starting unit.
IF you can show that getting the role players SHOULD be easier and having a coach like Adelman should help in identifying those players for once.
"My love for Jerry Kill knows no bounds." - Jeffrick
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 29, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions
Here are some thoughts
SnP, I actually agree pretty heavily on your idea to add 1 good player to Rubio and Love and I was thinking about how we briefly talked about the Kidd Marbury trade and how that catipulted the lottery bound Nets to being an East power for about 5 years.
Think about that team: Kidd, Carter (towards the end of the run)/Kittles, Jefferson, Martin (?), Jason Collins
Carter was okay (when he wanted to be), Jefferson was very good for a few years there….but really nothing too special. Just some good players playing with one of the best pass first point guards in the last 20 years.
Love is way better than either Carter or Jefferson were during those runs, so I def agree that if you can add another good piece to this then we’re really starting to get somewhere.
McHale/Kahn
Look I don’t love Kahn, maybe he is maybe he isn’t worse than McHale….but McHale had one of the best players of the last 15 years on his team and couldn’t do anything with it. He did squander draft picks and signed some horrible deals (like the one we are about to be paying for this summer).
I guess you do have to give him the fact that he drafted two franchise players….but at least with the first one he couldn’t have done a worse job with it. I can think of three specific drafts that could have changed everything.
1.) 1999: We took Will Avery while Maggette was either the pick before or after (Ron Artest was in that range too). I think a team of Brandon, Maggette, Wally, Kg would have been way good if they would have stayed healthy
2.) Rashad Mccants: taken 3 picks before Danny Granger
3.) Foye/Roy (which still looks bad even with Roys injury)
also he may have inadvertently screwed the KLove regime up considering he took Brewer instead of Noah (Noah, Love and Rubio would be reallllllllly nice) and just completely f’d up the KG.
Think about the KG trade for a second, if we’d have gotten Tony Allen, Rondo and Jefferson +the picks package we got (which we got our own pick back) instead of all that garbage AND drafted Noah…..we may have been looking at not the worst situation ever (still a little thick in the post)
Idk….maybe I’m more bitter to McHale since he ruined my youth and Kahn’s damages aren’t fully coming to fruition yet….but I still think I lean McHale….for now.
I want to caution on trading Williams. Not that we can’t do it, but let’s look at the Clippers situation for a moment.
Would the Clippers have been able to get Chris Paul for the Eric Gordon package with Eric Gordon as a rooke? I’m going to guess not….if someone wants to challenge that I will hear them out, but for the sake of argument I’m going no.
But they let their guy develop and they were able to net an All-Star for him.
There are trades I believe you should and shouldn’t make for Williams….Anything Kevin Martin or worse I would really really caution….if it’s a James Harden (which there will probably be some that say Harden isn’t better than Martin…I will disagree, I think his overall game is much more solid and his scoring upside I think can be just as good as Martin) or Eric Gordon….yes that’s a trade I’m willing to do….even Andre Iggy I’d look into.
Maybe I have something against Martin….idk…I think he’s a nice player but don’t think he’s worth the no.2 pick in the draft even in a weak draft even when he plays the position of your best player.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
That's the rub
I would trade Williams today for D. Wade, E. Gordon or J. Harden. However, I would really have a tough time trading him for K. Martin or any two guards that are worse. Thus, the idea is great in theory, but would those teams give away these guys for Williams? Doubt it. Thus, the idea is not legit in my mind.
One thing worth noting
Is that there has yet to be a max player who turned down the first extension from his team? It’s only after the second tour did Bosh/Wade/LeBron/Carmelo/Paul/Howard jump ship. Joe Johnson might be the one exception, but I can’t remember what he made when he moved to Atlanta.
So if we can assume that Love is going to stay around after next season, it follows that it might behoove the team not to panic and throw trade Rubio/Williams/Barea/Lee to OKC for Westbrook (though they’d be absolutely foolish not to look at a trade for him).But the
So I’m going to break internet law and propose a middle ground. Trade everyone but Love, Williams, and Rubio for something competent. Call up Chicago and ask about Ronnie Brewer or Kyle Korver. Play golf with Otis Smith and come away withJ.J. Reddick for Michael Beasley. See if Sacramento is really, really happy with Chuck Hayes’ heart. See if Josh Smith is still available. Ask about Iguodala and when your laughed offer is laughed at, turn around and ask for Jodie Smith. Phoenix is probably looking to unload Gortat at the moment, same with New Orleans and Okafor.
The point is, consider how absolutely garbage most of the team has played in the last three seasons, even modest players could boost this team significantly.
I don't know how the new CBA will work with max deal guys
He won’t be a Rose level guy and the league is seemingly militantly opposed to uppity players forcing their way out of bad situations after they retain their Bird rights. Chris Paul wasn’t able to sign and trade. I think that was the first shot fired on this front and I think it continues. That being said, you are right that players don’t typically turn down this amount of money. I just don’t think there are enough hometown discounts available in the new CBA and that league owners will make a lot more max players play out their deals without resigning instead of trading them. I think the Mark Cuban argument wins the minds of a bunch of owners (especially guys like Glen).
Why would Pheonix trade Gortat?
He’s almost all they have
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
He's turning 28
in six weeks, and by the time Phoenix finishes demolishing and rebuilding, he’ll be retired.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Do you know the details of this?
He mentoned he knew Marcin and his wife a few years ago and it has puzzled me ever since.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 1:54 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
They met
at a Swingers Convention. Hanny even put pictures up during the broadcast—of course, no one was watching, so it didn’t get much attention.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Heh
That game ranks just below Love’s 31/31 in my list of “Favorite Timberwolves Games In the Last Five Years.”
The list is two games long.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
You're forgetting the game where Spree
pantsed Cassell and we found out Sam was wearing three-piece suits under his uniform.
Correr como un lobo.
If that's true than we should try and get him
Cause Gortat is good stuff
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Gortat!
If we could somehow get him w/o dumping Williams, and then trade Williams into a SG, we’d have a real team going.
Not a bad plan
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I think Williamses's
Arizonaishness would make him the biggest attraction to the Suns. We could even get Jared Dudley out of it.
OR FINALLY JOSH CHILDRESSS!!!!
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
The thing to realize about Phoenix
Is that they are very, very dumb.
apparently neither team gets better lol
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I do
Nash does nothing for this team (and it looks like caught up with him during the offseason) and I find it hard to belive that we couldn’t get Gortat without giving up Williams.
why not do this?
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7apqput
I'm avid basketball fan and Manager of a little known team (tallandthicks) on little known internet based basketball manager site charazay. trust me I love this game
by tallandthicks on Dec 30, 2011 2:51 AM CST up reply actions
I doubt there will be any deal until
Adelman forms a complete opinion on the current roster. How long will/should that take? Dunno.
Looking for tickets to Wolves' 2011 NBA Preseason Champion ring ceremony, banner unfurling. Please contact
by Black Jack Davy on Dec 29, 2011 4:39 PM CST reply actions
The Wolves-Bucks game should speed the process.
Reduce turnovers, reduce personal fouls, shoot better, win.
by PoohRubio on Dec 29, 2011 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He wasn't coaching it though.
I don’t know if you guys read “Howlintwolf” or even like him, but he made a pretty good point about how Porter did the team no favors.
Especially with Beasley (I know it sounds like I just jump at any chance to defend the guy) where it was obvious Beasley was getting out of control and not trusting his teammates and he didn’t have Adleman to pull the reigns in and calm him down.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
People glancing at that game
broadcast on a TV in a bar could tell that Beasley was losing it—I don’t know why Porter had such a hard time recognizing the situation.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I was listening to the first quarter on radio
and I could tell.
Porter didn’t make a sub for like 7 minutes, it was nuts
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
We have 3 years of Beasley to go on
Rubio has been a pro for several years. Williams is the only real unknown on this roster. Malcolm Lee, too. Other than that, I think they already have a good idea of who/what is on the current roster.
How about this question
At what point in an NBA career do you lose it?
Ex. I realize Wes looks awful, but is it just how it goes that you write a guy off 1.5 years in his career?
I don’t actually have the answer… I would be inclined to say no, but I’m the optimist of the group.
Beasley being in the league for 3 years seems like enough time….but I dunno… 22 is awfully young to just abandon a guy that talented. I really want to give him some time with Adleman, this is by far the best situation/coaching combo he’s ever had in his whole career unless he’s part of a deal to get Gordon I’d like to see what happens at least.
Gerald Henderson is a guy who was pretty boring for rookie season and started to pick up late last year and now looks like he might be a real player (not like an all-star or anything) but what is the time frame? Do we have short fuses cause we’re the Wolves or do all teams/fan bases get bored with a guy if he doesn’t produce as a rookie?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Write Johnson off
He doesn’t pass the stats test or the eye test at this point. And he’s not that young.
I’m less inclined to write Beasley off.
by Dumbhead62 on Dec 29, 2011 4:57 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't disagree
it just seems weird to me that we know for a fact that 84 pro games in, Wes will never be a significant NBA player
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
It doesn't seem weird to me at all.
Great players show SOMETHING by this point. What does Wes have to his name? A few solid defensive performances against an aging Kobe Bryant during the regular season? Does anyone here believe that Bryant wouldn’t (even at this point) systematically dismantle Wes game by game in the playoffs? Probably not.
Wes Johnson is insanely lucky. He got hot very early in a college basketball season where most of his peers were doomed to suck. Because his peers sucked, folks looked for someone to hype. Because his peers continued to suck and because our organization lacked creativity, he got drafted where he did. He’s not a talented shooter, and he lacks other identifiable skills around which he might build a career. The sooner we cut bait for someone in the first round (only because, EiM, I don’t think we’ll be able to package him for a meaningful rotation player), the better. Nice guy, collegiate baller.
Yes, but I don't think Wes can be great.
Good though? Maybe. He has tools to be a good ball player.
It’s rare that a great player doesn’t show anything in his rookie year…but good players? Danny Granger didn’t do a whole lot in his rookie season (and he was an older guy too).
Wes looks so bad on so many levels and if we were to get a draft pick or whatever for him I wouldn’t really shed a tear. I have very little attachment too the guy. I either wanted Paul George or to trade up for Turner….so he wasn’t really my choice.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:53 PM CST up reply actions
App.
Going into coaching the wolves Do you think a guy like Adleman looks at a guy like Beasley and thinks “I think I can get too him” or do you think he just smacks himself on the head because he has to work with him?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
There is nothing more damaging to a team...
..than holding on for too long. The chances of finding that single piece of gold in a mountain of dung are sooooo slim that you are much better off applying basic statistics: when it is not known that things that appear the same are really different, the best we can do is to assume that they are the same.
Short fuses are very important. We’re hard wired for loss aversion so this can be tough, but the whole point of accumulating assets is to get as much value out of them as possible. Nothing kills franchises more often than not cutting bait on overvalued assets before everybody else realizes they’re overvalued. The Vikes will probably spend the next 2-3 years figuring this out with Ponder and Webb.
I guess I can't really disagree with that
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Soooo, you're saying don't extend Lazar and Ellington?
But they might turn it around!
So you're saying there's a chance!
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:54 PM CST up reply actions
Jamal Crawford
No clue why they didn’t push harder for him. He’s a vet and can score. Two things we could use. Not sure if he turned us down outright, but christ, Portland pretty much got him for free… 2yrs/$10MM. If he was on this roster I see no reason we don’t beat OKC and potentially the Bucks in the first two games.
I think to get him we would have had to amnesty darko, luke, or beas?
We didn’t have any cap space after we got barera.
After Tuesday, I'd resolved to stay away from CH for a couple days...
and then, “How to love Love” came through on my facebook feed, linked to by the man himself.
Ruh-roh.
Great article as usual, SnP, and entertaining/interesting comments from everyone :). Hopefully someone with influence agreed/is listening ;).
by PDGirl on Dec 29, 2011 5:14 PM CST via Android app reply actions
do not trade Williams
The idea of trading Williams is working off a number of assumptions that may prove incorrect, primarily 1) he can’t play alongside Love and 2) he won’t develop into a great talent. I don’t believe in trading rookies until you know what you got. Trading Williams will probably go down as one of the biggest mistakes Kahn (attributed, but not actually) could make, unless he gets a bonafide all-star in return. ‘Trade him while his value is high’ makes the horrible assumption that his trade value will fall. Here’s a guy with a good head on his shoulders, who’s worked hard on every level and who has defied expectations on every level. And we expect him to get worse?? Makes no sense.
We keep our best talent (Love, Rubio) and our developing talent (Williams, Lee). Pray Adelman and staff will want to preserve his career winning record (I’m pretty sure Adelman has some sort of plan, otherwise he wouldn’t take the job. Why destroy his legacy?). Pray Rubio attracts FA talent. And put everyone else on the trade block, Beasley in particular, regardless of his perceived trade value. I’d make the argument that after last season, Beasley doesn’t fit on this team and with the addition of Williams, he fits even less. His WP48 is the worst on the team. We gotta stop worrying about how the rest of the league ‘perceives’ our players and just dump our worst talent while keeping our best talent, unless we get all-stars in return.
First move ought to be putting Wes, Darko, Beas, and Luke on the trading block for whatever average SG we can get. Amnesty Webster or buy him out cuz he’s never getting better. Move after depends on who we get from the first move. And most importantly, pray, you silly atheists. We need Tebow-like faith for this team to around, so pray, pray, pary.
I don’t believe in trading rookies until you know what you got.
It sounds simple, but Yogi Berra might counter thusly:
The problem with the point at which you know what you got is that it can also be the point at which you know what you don’t got.
yeah, like Wes
But you don’t draft a guy #2 then dump him a month into the season. I don’t think there’s real trade value there in the first place — you start shopping him and everyone will start to think something’s wrong with him. You have no choice but to invest in him. Plus it’s only two games. I think Williams could be a monster in this league and I think he could be complementary with Love (he’s a slasher and outside shooter, not an occupy the left block 24/7 type-of-player).
If it turns out he’s another Wes, then he’s another Wes. We made that mistake by drafting him.
The trouble is,
Williams’ slashing and outside shooting have been two of his biggest faults in the first two games. Sure, it’s just two games, but so far he’s playing like a crosseyed cannonball.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 6:39 PM CST up reply actions
As far as failure modes go...
…watching him crush people is actually on the better side of things. I don’t like the turnovers, but it beats the hell out of Flynn dribbling it off his foot out of bounds.
I seem to recall a movie
featuring Dom Deluise and a jogging/racing suit that might have referenced this feat…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVl2CWK-6cA
Timberwolves 2011:
Kahnceptual Performance Art
So should we be calling him "Captain Chaos"?
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 29, 2011 11:04 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't get to see game #2
but in game #1 (and game #1 of pre-season), it looked to me like there might be the beginnings of a very real and productive on-court connection between he & Rubio. A guy who can flat out attack the rim and a guy who throws amazing, spontaneous passes to cutters. Isn’t that worth cultivating?
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
we will learn more about his shot as the sample grows
But i think you are looking at his slashing game backwards. His main issue is that he has apparently never encountered someone taking a charge before. He has also had no problem grtting past his defender. This tell me 1) he needs to start his attack closer to the rim and 2) he needs to adjust to team defenders and be reaey to stop his charge, pass the bll or use a counter move. None of these are like hoping Wes learns to dribble.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 2:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
It seemed to me
that he had a great deal of trouble getting past his defender, except in situations where they were rushing at him to close out the 3. When he got it close to the rim and tried to take a few monster steps past his man to get a shot close to the rim he seemed to get stuffed every time.
No, it doesn't have to be that way.
You target a player on another team’s roster who you like. You give them a low-ball offer (not including Williams). They might counter-offer by saying “if you give us Williams instead of Pek/Darko/whomever, you got a deal.” The chances of this happening might not be great, but if you pick the right team (i.e. one with a need at power forward and/or an illogical fascination with Derrick Williams) to talk to, you might have something.
by Are we cursed? on Dec 29, 2011 10:11 PM CST up reply actions
I think the chances that Williams develops into an All-Star are slim-to-none
like, less than 5%. I’d rather take the bird in hand. He is not the type of #2 pick that is obviously destined for stardom. Why not get something certain for him in return that will also help the team keep Love?
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
there are many players that have demonstrated themselves to be average to above-average NBA players
and some of these players also do not play the PF position or PG position. The Wolves need to trade for one of these players.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
Is there a way to find and replace every 'SG' with 'SG or SF' for each FanPost/comment?
Reduce turnovers, reduce personal fouls, shoot better, win.
No matter how little you think of Beasley
You’ve got to agree we’re worse off at SG with Wes, right?
Very nice article.
Bucks traded SnP to Wolves
You’re once a Bucks’ fan?
stop-n-pop == Terrell Brandon
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
If SnP is TB I will bow down to the alter of CH
TB was a stone cold pimp. Loved that ball player, wished he’d have stayed healthy
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 10:55 PM CST up reply actions
I'll never forget (at least the paraphrase of) Dan Barreiro's comments following TB's retirement
“I have never seen a player so happy, so thoroughly and completely overjoyed, to be announcing his own career-ending injury”
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe we could wait longer than 2 games into the season
…but maybe that’s just me
All About Wes
Obviously the Wolves can use an upgrade at every position but PF and PG. But in my view the only thing that is holding this team back from contending for a playoff spot is the absolute Godawful production we get from the 2 Spot. This is borne out by the early returns from this season and the numbers from last season: http://www.82games.com/1011/1011MIN5.HTM. You can’t win when your shooting guards collectively put up a PER of 10 and give up a PER of 18.
I can’t stand Beasley’s game, but he is a starting caliber SF. Darko gets a lot of deserved criticism, but given that Adelman won’t be running the offense through him and will limit his minutes to about 20 night, he is useful to keep around for his defense. Simply put, you get an average NBA shooting guard and this roster looks a hell of a lot more intriguing.
I don't get it
I understand that the stats indicated he was nowhere near worthy of being a top 5 pick but for him to look like he shouldn’t even be in the NBA? That is stunning. Can’t he just be Doug Christie? Please?
It's not that stunning
He’s playing like he did before moving to ’Cuse.
Why was he good as an orangeman?
Not sarcasm, but really, why was he good and then now so bad? He was a consensus top 5-6 pick, but he really does look like a lost, scared, and confused puppy now.
Good question
He shot 40% from 3 with Cuse, 50% overall. Also averaged almost 2 steals and 2 blocks per game, 8 boards per game. He’s clearly athletic, long arms, etc.
They say he got most of those #‘s against non conference, easy opponents. I still find it surprising that he doesn’t even look like an NBA player right now.
he was best at syracuse in their non-conference schedule and before he injured his wrist
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
I actually kinda like Darko
I think there is something there. Love seeing him shoulder Perkins. if we could get him to shoulder the starting 5 every night he might be a pretty solid player
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
If we could just get it through to him...
That guards are allowed to come smack the ball out of his hands as he is posting up looking the other way. He and Ralph Sampson III have 3 turnovers from that per game it seems like.
And that contrary
to what the rules might be in his home country, in the NBA it’s perfectly acceptable and legal to dunk the basketball.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Here's a fair question:
Why is it assumed players will never learn anything?
I’m 25 and have learned new things and changes to diet for example to make me better at what I do on a day-to-day basis. It’s something that I think if you would have looked at the way I ate when I was 22 you might think it would be something I would never even bother to consider.
Why can’t someone learn even if they have been stuck in a rut for 5-7 years?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 11:03 PM CST up reply actions
Why is it assumed players will never learn anything?
Unlike the stock market, past performance is a better-than-average indication of future results. If we’re talking about assumptions, the question is: why would we expect Player X to discontinue his habits, tendencies, patterns of productivity, etc.?
by nextmove on Dec 29, 2011 11:35 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
More often than not
Denny Green’s words ring true: “They are who we thought they were”
by nextmove on Dec 29, 2011 11:36 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
And for coaches like Denny Green, Kurt Rambis, etc.
that’s true.
There are reasons why Adelman gets the big bucks, and turning players around is one of them.
Correr como un lobo.
Kudos on cleaning up your diet, by the way
I was closer to 30 before I eliminated some of the crud I used to eat and drink on a weekly basis
Ahem
Some of us just learned those tricks when we were crowding 60.
It’s amazing how much more you listen to doctors when you get old.
sigh
I miss drinking during every game, but at least I’ve still got my MAYNHOLUP to keep me easily entertained.
Correr como un lobo.
this will sound harsh but please remember all of us here are in the same boat
you are doing something normal. pro ball players are not. that is the big difference.
I think more so what I'm getting at
Isn’t there just a “growing up” process to all of this though?
My point was, if I was a pro ball player….I would not have been a very mature 22 year old (as I was not), but now I’m 25 and gotten bunch of stuff squared away…but I wouldn’t have wanted to count on me to save a franchise at 22 even if I had the talent.
Does growing up in the NBA just never happen? That’s kinda what I’m getting at
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
getting more mature at life doesn't always mean you get better at your job
what these guys are getting paid to do is so outlandishly abnormal that it’s hard to apply real world rules to what is happening. i’m sure lots of these guys “grow up”. i’m sure this happens all the time and with all sorts of different levels of players. growing up doesn’t have to have anything to do with playing awesome professional basketball.
See Wells, Bonzi
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
Fun question, though...
can we name any players who really came into their own a few years after languishing? Chauncy Billups is the one that comes immediately to mind…
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
ahhhh… Kwame Brown?! Michael Olowokandi!? Gerald Green?! hello, the list goes on and on
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
Even in his Minnesota years,
Billups put up WS/48 of 0.098 and 0.156. That level of productivity would have made him the 2nd best T-wolf last year.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
It's always Chauncey Billups
and nobody else.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I'm gonna enjoy
watching the post-extension career of Z-Bo, and see how long it takes him to get arrested/injured/bought out.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Forgive my ignorance....
Zach Randolph?
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 1:13 PM CST up reply actions
Danny Granger?
Pek apologist
by running with Twolves (and scissors) on Dec 30, 2011 3:01 PM CST up reply actions
Marc Gasol, Kendrick Perkins, Danny Granger, how about a throw back Darrell Armstrong
It feels like it happens about once a season…meaning there are maybe 10 active players….which again is silly to believe that we’d successfully do it to 3 players….but it does happen
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Marc Gasol had a WS/48 of 0.121 his first year in the league and quickly built from there.
Similar story with Danny Granger
Darrell Armstrong seems like more of a Sessions kind of example. Didn’t get a shot until he had played ball outside the NBA for a few years, but was a pretty solid NBA player from the get-go.
Perkins seems like a pretty good example though.
Perkins and Rondo
should have an asterisk next to their career stats. I’m not sure they would have become nearly as successful if they hadn’t had their asses kicked on a daily basis by KG, Allen, and Pierce.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I am guessing there is a little more going on upstairs
For the average CHer. Intelligent people learn and adjust. Natural talents without this self awareness will have a much harder time.
There is also the issue of the sheer amount of routine and muscle memory that is involved in high level athletics. It is frankly hard to learn to dribble well if you haven’t yet picked it up. Even if you improve your handle, your brain probably doesn’t slashing opportunities because you aren’t accustomed to look for them. In pressure situations when you don’t have time to think, you fall back on what you know, like Wes passing the ball or going to bis one step J.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 2:14 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
With Beasley though
I’m just curious to see what his game will look like if he finds the right coach (like Adleman) who puts in the time and believes in him
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I have to take exception to that
(probably could have worded that better)
Top athletes are not stupid. They may not be educated, but the truly thick cannot make good use of a great body on the basketball court. It’s more than just running and jumping. If it wasn’t, we’d be talking about ARandolph’s max contract negotiations.
Correr como un lobo.
While potentially agree with the exception you take
you may have possibly argued against your own point. Xand1 would probably suggest that those who have learned to turn raw physical gifts into Max Contract Negotiations are the ones who do possesses this self-awareness. There are more Anthony Randolphs than Zach Randolphs.
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 4:04 PM CST up reply actions
there are more Ryan Hollinses
than Lionel Hollinses
by dontbesomean youngfella on Dec 30, 2011 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
From my own personal experience...
…I think this is very much true. The farther back from the players the fans are, I think it is for the better. Especially the guys who went through the AAU pipeline.
I can't remember who it was,
but several years ago a recently-drafted European NBA player was asked at the draft what his favorite food was, and he replied, “soup.”
That still cracks me up.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 30, 2011 4:37 PM CST up reply actions
I saw my first Darko robbed from behind incident last game.
Same old same old. But at least his touches down and he isn’t expected to facilitate the offense so I don’t imagine it will be a regular occurance.
Off topic but
If you haven’t been out to Sheridan Hoops, you ought to give it a try.
Where there is a D-Williams, there is a way
Oh, that Kahn....(per Jerry Zgoda)
One strange sight down there at the Wolves’ basement practice court:
I saw this guy, his hair wildly disheveled, churning furiously on an exercise machine as "Heat players lingered on the court a couple feet away and couldn’t figure who with the Heat this might be.
Then I realized it was David Kahn.
My intial thought seeing him out of place like that with Heat players and coaches everywhere:
Maybe he had been traded…"
http://www.startribune.com/sports/136398383.html
Where there is a D-Williams, there is a way
I love Kahn
What a goof.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Great Post, SnP.
You have definitely fleshed out your case for a major move in the near future.
I’m more optimistic than some I suppose, I feel as if Malcolm Lee will turn out to be a Vinny Johnson type bench player. I also think that DWill can develop into a nice scoring big and possibly be an average defender. I am in love with Rubio’s game whether he develops into a double digit scorer or not. His court vision is scary good and his stutter step moves will get him openings in the lane.
As for the rest of the roster, meh…
Wes is worth exactly a late second round pick as is Pek. Ridnour, Berea, and Beas are acceptable trade bait along with gobs of cash to get a SG/SF. Darko is an adequate defensive center. Webster and Wayne are at best filler on a roster.
Which leaves me thinking that a trade even including Williams is likely the best move to be made; if a pile of DWill, Beas, Pek and Ridnour gets us Gordon sign me up Please!
Timberwolves 2011:
Kahnceptual Performance Art
I left out Tolliver.
I like his game, but he is best suited to a bench role and likely doesn’t have much trade value. He is also a glue guy on a cheap contract, it’s hard to have too many of those…
Timberwolves 2011:
Kahnceptual Performance Art
Here is something to think about
If everything I’ve been told is true….we pretty much just went through another regime change this offseason. Team Adleman is now in charge.
For as much as I hate to say it….let’s give these guys a little bit to do what they want to do. Does anyone doubt if Adleman had wanted to trade Williams that it would have gotten done?
Patience can suck as a Wolves fan I understand….We got a guy in charge now with a fairly proven track record of success….let’s just see what happens. Maybe trades come by the dozen…maybe they don’t. Maybe Rick hates Beasley and is playing him because has too….or maybe he’s like “ya know, there is something about the kid.” Maybe there is no chance Williams can start for this team….maybe he Love and Beasley will be brilliant together.
Let’s give it some time and see what happens. I think the Milwaukee game freaked the hell out of everyone (don’t blame you), but let’s just ride this thing out. Rick Adleman has coached 1 game as a Wolves coach.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I do have MUCH more faith in RA as a better than adequate
coach and evaluator of talent. And the Milwaukee game did bring back some of the horror that has been the last two seasons of our discontent.
But, baring incredible development from Malcolm Lee, we are (admittedly like many other teams) in dire need of a scoring guard/forward. That is the kind of missing piece that keeps teams from ever hoping to get above .500 much less advancing in the playoffs. One way or another, that HAS to be addressed to give us a chance to be relevant.
Timberwolves 2011:
Kahnceptual Performance Art
Malcolm
I think we WILL see incredible development out of Malcolm Lee. He’s not Michael Jordan, he’s not Dwyane Wade, but I think that he will be the starter next year.
The kid is crafty, and I think if he can stay healthy, his game will grow. He’s the type of player who knows how to ADD different aspects to his game. I don’t feel like Wes gets that…
I am not a good basketball player, never have been, but I am much better than I was in 8th grade. I can dribble with my right hand now, hit turn-arounds/fade-aways, hit floaters, bank shots, when all I used to be able to do was randomly hit a set shot. my friend, who was much better than I was in 8th grade, is equal to me now… because he still plays the exact same as he did in 8th grade. He still does the exact same moves. I feel like Wes is that guy. Hopefully Malcolm is me lol
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
Malcolm Lee will come save us?
I have been seeing a lot of irrational exuberance about Mr. Lee. I don’t get it. What has he done that would suggest he’ll be better than Wayne Ellington? I realize that on the wolves, the bar for competent 2 guard play has been taken out back, shot, and buried, but the only thing recommending Lee is I haven’t seen him be below replacement level in the NBA yet.
by aarendsvark on Dec 30, 2011 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
who said he’ll come save us? that’s exactly what i was trying to avoid by saying he’s not MJ or Wade…
I watched Lee play quite a bit at UCLA… and I’ve also seen what Howland guards grow into… and I know that just because howland coached a guy doesn’t mean he’ll be good, but I watched all those other guys too, and I think Malcolm fits the mold of a guy with limbs, and a good work ethic, who gets how to add different facets to his game.
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
i also think that mentioning incredible development lends to the fact that he is NOT that great right now. (he doesn’t even get to play on the wolves right now lol)
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
I think most come from the thinking of "can he really be that much worse than we already have"? I don't think there are too many saying he'll "save us".
Lee, regardless of his struggles in college, does do some things well, he’s a good ball-handler, a good defender, and he’s good in transition, which are skills this team needs. At this point the unknown is probably what is making Lee so popular because we know what Wes and Wayne can do at this level we don’t know what Lee is capable of the NBA level yet.
In no way am I saying he is a starter in this league or below replacement level in this league, which is what Wes and Wayne are, but he should at least be given the oppurtunity to play when he gets healthy because we already know that the other options are abysmal and I think it’s hard to fathom that he is that much worse than our current options.
by Magoo12218 on Dec 30, 2011 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He's wicked fast and has long arms..
..that’s a good start
I’d like to see more of him.
unless his knee is messed up
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
I'm not sure what this article really concludes
If the Wolves could trade Wes Johnson for a Kevin Martin-type, or an Andrew Bogut to fill an existing hole with a borderline all star vet, I think 90 percent of this site would agree. We pretty much know what we will have with Wes. But to trade still unknown but high potential commodities like Rubio and/or Williams, no way. We won’t know what we have with either of those players for at least this year and maybe even longer. I think you could argue what side of the ledger Beasley is on, but he has no value right now anyway, so no reason to trade him.
98/99 was not a bad season, and I think it counters your ultimate conclusion. We were a .500 team that and made the playoffs. Up until the Marbury trade the Wolves looked like the up and coming team with two potential superstars. Then we conducted a trade that resulted in exactly what you are proposing here. We acquired Brandon as a veteran border line all star point guard and made a very safe draft pick with Wally to fill another need. Unfortunately then we had no choice, but we do now. After the trade, we went to long-term mediocrity until 2005, when we found a way to leverage Brandon and Joe Smith’s contracts into high-risk, high-reward vets. Sprewell and Cassell paid off in year one and destroyed our franchise the second year.
The KG era came up short because we failed to pair him with another superstar. Note that we blew a second opportunity when we failed to resign Chauncey Billups. think about that before signing off on a trade to send away Derrick Williams or Michael Beasley.
To me, your strategy is simply to replay the Garnett era, which overall left fans disappointed when we failed to play for a banner in even one year.
I’m all about going for broke here, and to me that means rolling the dice with Rubio, Williams and Beasley. If you trade one of those, don’t do it to guarantee a perpetual 8th seed, but do it if you think you can get something to put us into the top.
I think it is knee jerk to see these kind of posts two games into a season where we are playing with a number of new players and a new coach.
by Mike B. on Dec 29, 2011 8:20 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
The disagreement here has one source
Differences in beliefs about the probability that Williams becomes an above-average NBA PF
If you believe that the probability that he becomes an above average PF is 70% then you support the Wolves keeping him.
If you believe that the probability that he becomes an above average PF is 30% then you support trading him.
If you believe he is redundant with Love then you support trading him regardless of your belief as long as your trading partner values him more than you.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
Thanks for the comments
I’m not arguing that 98/99 was a bad season. KG had some help. He was not yet at the peak of his powers. The Marbury business sucked but it didn’t completely take the wind out of the franchise.
I’m all about replaying the Garnett era. If they can find a way to surround Love with another version of Spree and Sam, so be it. Hopefully, this time around, the Sam version won’t get hurt and the Spree version won’t get stupid.
I think it is impossible to chose to go for broke in the NBA. It is a league based on luck. You can be smart and talented and operate at 45-55 wins but it takes true luck to win a title. Perpetual 8th seeds are what most teams can only hope for. They give their paying customers entertaining basketball and their owners paycheck-free added profit. There is no 1 sure formula to put the Wolves into the top. It is, has been, and always will be luck.
I don’t think it’s knee jerk at all. I’m arguing that Williams is the only player on the squad that has a sure undervalued stock. Everybody else (except Malcolm Lee) is a known quantity.
Love needs other competent players. Be that D-Will (the Utah original), Crawford, Martin, Gordon, Okafor…I dont’ care. Just get 2-2.5 player minutes worth of good production and let the tickets actually be worth something.
Thanks for this article
It feels like a distilation of the things we have been discussing for a while, and it’s very passionatly and well done. I have been away from the computer all day the day you post an article on exactly the issue I have been harping on, but it’s such a well writen piece that I was entirely unneeded.
Well done my friend.
The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.
by Eric in Madison on Dec 29, 2011 10:01 PM CST up reply actions
Danke
My hope is that the Wolves can become the pro ball version of Punisher: War Zone. Yes, it’s corny as hell. Yes, it’s weird and may kind of suck. But do not say you were not entertained!
Spree and Sam and another angle
My view on these acquisitions is that they resulted more from circumstance as opposed to any long-term strategic vision. The teams that traded us these players did so for salary circumstances, and we really gave up nothing in exchange. They are more on par with the Beasley trade, than if we say traded Derrick Williams for Kevin Martin. I have no doubt that whateveer direction the Wolves take, that deals like Sam and Spree will come up once or twice a decade. You can’t force those trades though, like McHale tried to do afterwards when he started reaching on deals, ala Ricky Davis.
I would be more interested in your strategic direction if Kevin Love’s conditions for re-signing a contract included that this team post a competitive record this year. I have not heard anything to suggest that such a condition exists, but it certainly is plausible. Then the decision is do we make moves that could very well limit our ceiling in favor of immediate improvement so as to guarantee Love’s long term tenure?
You are betting that Love’s outstanding advanced statistics will eventually translate into wins. Note that Love has not led a team to the playoffs. Garnett did within one year. I would argue he brought an immediate presence to this franchise that Love has not replicated. An interesting research project would look at Garnett’s teammates during the late 90s and see how their performance compared to years they did not play with Garnett. Great players elevate those around them. There is an anomaly with Kevin Love’s superior advanced statistics and the team’s overall record during his tenure.
Love’s “outstanding advanced statistics” will never translate into wins. The whole point of this article is to point out that even superstar level production needs help.
Sam Cassell was a well above average player when he came to the Wolves. Spre had seen better days. The Mayor was pretty damn good. I think the interesting question here would be to measure how players with solid play on their track record step up their game in the presence of superstar production compared to players that suck.
I just don’t agree with the statement that there is an anomaly with Kevin Love’s superior production and the team’s overall record during his tenure. The anomaly has to do with the people he is surrounded with. They’re really, really, really bad at professional basketball.
completely unfair comparison
But the idea of trading Williams while he is “the only player on the squad that has a sure undervalued stock” reminds when Love got a touch of playing time and people were clamoring to trade him for Anthony Randolph. Then Love got a touch more playing time and people were clamoring to trade him for Josh Smith.
You don’t trade your promising players because they’re promising.
Williams won’t be anywhere close to Love; I’m not arguing that. But I am arguing that it is absolutely knee jerk to want to trade the #2 pick after 2 games because he might be undervalued and everyone else on the team, other than Love and Rubio, is a known suck.
The only argument I can see for trading him based on position is if we can get an all-star caliber starter (SG/SF/C) for him, since in our current rotation, he’s more or less a back-up PF. If he blossoms, we have another starter with even higher trade value. If he doesn’t blossom, we have a competent back-up PF. If we trade him for an ‘average’ player to balance our roster, we’re spinning our wheels and not capitalizing on talent/assets. And finally, the argument that he is redundant has yet to be proven on the court in Adelman’s system ( trading williams doesn’t balance the roster — adding a SG does).
And if Love needs other competent players, why don’t we trade our crap players (instead of our competent ones) moneyball fashion for less crappy players? Say Beasley for a SF with a WP48 lower than a -.156? http://www.thenbageek.com/players/compare?utf8=%E2%9C%93&player_ids%5B%5D=180 If you’re curious, that would be almost any other SF in the league.
It's not so much
about Williams as a player, it’s about his position. If things go really well this year Kevin Love will get 38 minutes a game, most of that at the PF. That leaves 10-15 minutes for Williams, to say nothing of the several dozen other PFs the team has cleverly stockpiled.
I think they took the consensus 2nd best player in the draft and waited for the phone to ring. No attractive offers were forthcoming, and so far it seems that Williams has some talent, but isn’t ready yet for major minutes at the PF. No All Star caliber player is coming to the Wolves for that type of guy even up, and the Wolves don’t have a whole lot else to offer (as you adroitly point out).
So, they’re forced to see if the glow from Adelman/Rubio/Love can rub off on the rest of the detrius on this team, and maybe Tolliver and Barea can plug a few holes until they “get” it. Unless they turn things around quickly, they won’t be in a position for a playoff push that would require major additions, anyway.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
I think the phone not ringing like they thought it would
Is pretty close to the truth.
Also, to get around to monkeywolf’s point, nobody is saying trade your promising players because they’re promising. What is being said is that the Wolves either have a roster that has Love’s long term running partners or they have the assets that can be used to trade for those long term running partners. The draft option is out the window. Wes Johnson’s shine is gone. Williams, Rubio, and Love are the only players on this team that can be overvalued to the extent to bring back something really good outside of a complete insane salary dump…which, to be honest, I should have listed next to the stuff about calling the contract bluff.
The reason why the Wolves dont’ trade their crap players is because they’re crap players. Kahn overvalued the talent/potential of guys like Beasley and Randolph. This is the whole “player development” nonsense. Will Rick Adelman make guys more professional and cut down on some of the stupid mistakes while running good rotations with the best players? Absolutely, but he’s not a miracle worker. The chances of him turning a guy like Beasley into an average SF are low. The chances of a 3rd team wanting to take their shot at Beasley (or a 4th team with Randolph…or a 6th team with Darko) to make him better are just as low. These guys play actual basketball games that everyone in the league can see. They’re not very good.
Good rationale for shooting for an 8th seed
I hate hate hate it…..
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut, you might have me coming around to your opinion a tad bit
Problem with your list of players….big difference IMO between DWill and the rest (and I’d even argue there is a second tier where Gordon sits alone)
Again, Crawford…Martin….eh not overly interested for Derrick Williams….Derron Will? Gordon? Something like that….I would be very interested in.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 29, 2011 11:00 PM CST up reply actions
they shot for the 30 th seed last year
i think you seem to often forget how much more that sucks than shooting for 7 extra games.
Well, where you make a lot of sense is
“I think it is impossible to chose to go for broke in the NBA. It is a league based on luck. You can be smart and talented and operate at 45-55 wins but it takes true luck to win a title. Perpetual 8th seeds are what most teams can only hope for. They give their paying customers entertaining basketball and their owners paycheck-free added profit. There is no 1 sure formula to put the Wolves into the top. It is, has been, and always will be luck.”
I’ve never been in favor of tanking, but I am in favor of focusing on young talent. I think Kahn has had the right idea…just executed poorly.
Had he gone Rubio/Henderson/Holiday/Blair/Jerbako in 2009 or Rubio/Curry etc
and then in 2010 either take Cousins (try and trade him, imo), or trade up for Turner or down for George
that isn’t trying to suck, but it still is focusing on young talent (which if nothing else is always tradeable) and we possibly could be the 8th seed this year with an optimistic view of the future.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I just posted....
…this over at the Hornets site:
The league won’t tell you this, but for the vast majority of fans, the NBA really isn’t about winning it all. That requires luck, and luck is above and beyond the control of even the best GMs. Sam Presti isn’t Sam Presti without Portland getting itself Pritch Slapped (is Sam Presti the new Kevin Pritchard or is Kevin Pritchard the first Sam Presti?). The Bulls drafted 2 top picks before having to wait another 7 years for Derrick Rose. They may have even had a Rose-esque player in Jay Williams before he got stupid on a motorcycle. The point here is that finding a player who can take you to the 1 place in the world that every other pro team wants to get to is 100% dependent on things that are out of your (and your team’s) control.
Instead, this league is, for most of us, about simple entertainment. It is about getting your money’s worth on the same night as the date on that $30 ticket you just handed to the guy/gal at the gate. It isn’t about cap space, trade exceptions and caches of 1st round picks that hopefully/maybe/someday will give you a shot at the title. That’s just the nonsense that the league will sell you while they keep costs as low as possible for the still-imaginary rich person that will eventually ask you for more tax dollars for a new arena.
As bad as things might seem right now, and as much as you are being asked to suffer while waiting for magic to happen at income levels well beyond the bills in your wallet and with numbers beyond what you can dial, you sill have things to legitimately be hopeful for. You have a good GM in Dell Demps (when the league actually allows him to do his job), you still have average-to-above-average professional players (Eric Gordon, Emeka Okafor, Carl Landry, and hopefully Chris Kaman and Trevor Ariza), and you appear to have a really good coach.
As a fan of a team that went through 7 straight 1-and-done post seasons before coming within a Sam Cassel injury of winning it all, and who has spent the last 7 years rooting for some of the worst basketball that you can possibly imagine watching, I can honestly tell you that there is nothing wrong with being just good enough to have the chance to watch an extra 7 games a year. Those extra 7 games are a much more likely possibility for entertainment than is landing the transcendent player who can take you the distance. You had that guy. He’s gone. Things can still be good. Things can still be entertaining.
One of the things we joke about over at Canis Hoopus is that someday, all of the losing will be worth it—someday, all the suffering and money and dashed draft hopes will pay off in an amazing title run (they’re going to be the league’s first 80-win team). Someday, the payoff for all of this crap is going to be worth…well, the truth is that a team built around Kevin Love, Al Jefferson, and, had they drafted well, Steph Curry or Ty Lawson, has the same “upside” as a team built around Kevin Love, Derrick Williams, and Ricky Rubio. Future assets are rarely worth what you have to deal with in the meantime. The seas are always stormy. Make the most of what you have in the here and now instead of filling the books with “assets” that will turn into gold after (insert magic here). Denver seems to be the only team in recent memory that realizes currently good players > “assets”.
Don’t buy into potential picks, cap space, trade exceptions or any of the other nonsense your ticket reps, the league, and (eventually) your front office will approach you with. Demand a good product on the date of your ticket. You don’t deserve and should not accept anything less. The NBA middle class (even the upper-lower-middle-class) is nothing to turn up your nose at, and the chances of these austere measures being for the benefit of anybody but a super rich owner are slim.
I hope you find an owner and I hope that owner realizes that those top picks can best be spent on landing more above average players to put around Eric Gordon, Emeka Okafor, and Carl Landry so that you can win 50 games and get to the playoffs a hell of a lot quicker than you can when Anthony Davis and whoever Eric Gordon is flipped for wins 50 games. Oh, you’ll have to cross your fingers a whole lot with that 2nd option.
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 30, 2011 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
It's good stuff
I still like the Clippers deal more than the Lakers deal ;)
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 10:20 AM CST up reply actions
You're convinced they won't keep Gordon though?
That changes things if true.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
Look at any roster in the league from 5 years ago
People move. If it’s not Gordon it will be another one (or more) of their current good players.
I still think we haven't heard the last of that deal
There is no way on god’s green earth that that Laker trade didn’t come across Stern’s desk before they pulled the trigger.
Hoops philosophy question
What exactly do you mean by shoot for the 8th seed?
Would you agree there are limitations to getting average starters to fill around Love?
Like I said previously, in 2009 there was a legitimate option for us to come out of this draft with (this is without Kahn taking Curry…cause Rubio and Curry "wouldn’t work defensively):
Rubio (pg of the future)/ Henderson (compotent, athletic, defensive 2)/ Holiday (pg of the present, trade asset for the future)/Dujuan Blair/Jonas Jerbako
All those picks where very probably considering where we had draft picks and where all those guys fell……is that not better than just acquiring a bunch of average to above average veteran’s to fill around Love?
Those are all average to above-average players under 24 who all have room to grow still, are cheaper, and have trade value.
Would you still rather do what you have been suggesting had we had a 2009 draft like that?
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 10:35 AM CST up reply actions
You shoot to be good and competent
More often than not, that means average. Happiness is possible with average things. It’s harder to come upon when you’re being shat on.
Here's what I'm getting at
I feel like if you give me a year, I can get you to where you want to go (which is contending for a playoff spot) AND set you up better for the future than just getting a bunch of veteran’s who are average to above average, with my philosophy.
I can understand the frustration with the draft process….But the Wolves have made it a lot tougher than it actually is IMO. there is luck to it, but if you just draft the best players available you will rarely come out with as much blah as we have
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
No you can't
Neither can I. Chances are neither will Team Adelman.
This isn’t a frustration with the draft process (although the Wolves have been awful on that front). It’s frustration with the concept that future assets are worth more than what could have been had by simply being competent at any point in the last 3-5 years. Al Jefferson + Love + Curry or Lawson has the exact same “upside” as Love + D-Thrill + Rubio.
Looks like
your image is broken in the post.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 30, 2011 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
A very nice post.
I am sure I could never put together such a complete and convincing article, even though some of the same raw notions have been turning over in my brain lately. In some ways this offseason has been a huge disappointment for me. I look back on the previous off season and I wanted one outcome, which I thought would never materialize: 4 new starters. That was my goal, and anything less would have pissed me off. Low and behold, come the start of the season, Flynn was out as a starter (likely only because of injury), Corey was no longer the starting 2, Beasley was in at 3, and Love was now a starter (or soon was, I don’t remember). Of course, we swapped replacement level talent for more of the same, but at least there was reason for blind idiotic optimism, the kind that Rambis ate up and shat out daily.
This off season, forgetting about the joy of Adelman and the clusterf— of the lock out, I thought only of roster balance. In my ideal this would come from an upheaval of the roster in ways I’ve probably lobbied way too hard for on this board, but I would have been happy with a basic move that solved the problem that the team did not have one legitimate SG on the squad. All I wanted was one move that addressed this issue and balanced out a PF-heavy squad. With the other changes I could stomach our weakness at the 5, but I really needed to see a new SG on this squad so that we’d have more potential for improvement than could be provided by an actual head coach and Rubio. I hoped for something dynamic around the draft when the #2 pick was both valuable and unquestionably going to harpoon another PF. I waited as our later picks were sold backward into the territory where you’d have to trust the Kahn scouting group over the talent evaluators of every other NBA team. Then I waited as the post lockout FA frenzy brought in only another PG. I can’t believe that now, as the season gains steam, the coach we put so much faith in has no real choice other than rolling out the Johnson-Beasley wing combo that brought us nothing good last season.
It is very hard for me to enjoy that early season unfounded optimism that should be my birthright as a fan, given that we are not only rolling out the same starting squad that won 17 games last year, but have no other real options for replacing the two biggest positions of suckitude from last season.
by dropstep on Dec 29, 2011 11:39 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Great post
There is still only hope. Hope that RJ Adelman is not an idiot and is in control. Hope that trades will be made. Good trades.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
We will see
if Team Adelman can make any sort of shrewd moves that help us win. I have the feeling this is going to be a long and frustrating season simply because all we will want to see is for the team to execute, and that is most easily done with competent veteran players. Sigh.
by Dr. Wolfenstein on Dec 30, 2011 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
Nice write up SnP
So now we just need a list of realistic players to target? Not really sure how to do it (Did I do it right? Hmm, still have to sort by WS/48?)
Looks to have around 100 players at that 0.1+ mark. Then break out SG and/or C, and value to their current team…?
James Anderson? Didn’t they covet Pek (sorry CJ)…
Just looking for some more ideas and possibilities.
Based on that list
I think we call up SAC and HOU and offer them anything and everything for Donte Green and Hasheem Thabeet.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
No problem--
your new list has the tantalizing Orien Greene ahead of LeBron.
I MUST HAVE HIM!!!
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
You may get your shot
along with several past (and future!) Timberwolves:
ESPNSteinLine Marc Stein
BTW: Gerald Green, Mardy Collins, Manny Harris and Orien Greene also in D-League BUT bit too soon to talk about them in comeback-trail terms
50 minutes agoESPNSteinLine Marc Stein
Still in top shape at 36, Mike James to join Antoine Walker, Ricky Davis and Greg Ostertag (after FIVE years out) on D-League comeback trail
2 hours ago
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
We have a lot of expiring and non-guaranteed (in 2012-3) deals,
some for players with actual skills that might be useful to a team: Beasley ($6.26m), Webster ($5.26m), Randolph ($2.9m), Tolliver ($2.05m), and Miller ($4.75m).
So which useful players might be available as part of a salary dump? Here’s my list of top candidates. Don’t get too excited — they’re better than we have, but still not great: Ben Gordon ($11.6m), Salmons ($8.5m), Childress ($6m). What do you think, do we take on some bad deals to get players who are mediocre instead of bad?
I stripped the 12-13 free agent part of this post...
…because the “gettable” list was too depressing. Salmons is probably the guy.
Yeah, Salmons seems plausible
if not entirely desirable. I also wonder whether Orlando immediately regrets its decision to re-sign Richardson. Maybe some cap relief plus a tiny bit of talent (or hope for talent, such as Wes) could get him once they give up on keeping Howard.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 10:27 AM CST up reply actions
2 things I left out for length (stupid, right?) but wish I hadn't
Free agent list and fire sale candidates. Some teams will decide that they need to blow it up and that is a likely place to look for average-to-above-average starting level players. Devin Harris, Deron Williams, (swallows hard) JJ Redick, one of the guards on SacTown, Monta Ellis when the Marc Jackson experiment starts to go south, Kevin Martin if Houston gets their plug pulled, etc.
I definitely should have included the fire sale bit in the article. That’s a stupid oversight. Stupid not-having-an-editor.
There was already a lot to chew on in the post,
but a separate post on fire sale candidates would be interesting. After looking at our contract situation, I’m a little more optimistic about this method of getting better.
I was just trying to put together a trade that gets Biyombo and Maggette from Charlotte. A man can dream (not the Maggette part).
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 10:45 AM CST up reply actions
Kahn would get skewered if he traded
Williams for Biyombo straight up. Except for me. I’d be jumping up and down and popping the champagne.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 10:50 AM CST up reply actions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J86kvfV5aOI
He’s suuuppppperrrr raw but look at the turn and block on Bosh. Finding humans that big who can move like that is an exceedingly rare thing. Throw in his EL production…bring us the Manther!
The Bosh play was literally the first thing I saw
when I switched to that game. Oh, what a freaky, awesome team we would have been with Biyombo, Rubio, and Love. I totally agree with the “raw” part and Eric’s inevitable criticism that he wouldn’t have won games for us this year, but rational arguments cannot sway me on this.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
I can't be swayed with rational arguments about Biyombo either
The Manther needed to play with the Spanish Unicorn…if just for 5-8 minutes a game.
I feel like there would be a few lobs
Between those two.
Bismack is going to be a game-changing defensive player with his combo of quick feet, quick ups, long arms and instincts. I’m way more certain than I should be.
Bobcats have a very active team
They should be fun to watch
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, from what I saw Kemba
was living up to SnP’s prediction of being who Kahn thought Flynn would be.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:17 AM CST up reply actions
Kemba looks fine
I really like the Augustin/Henderson backcourt. they kind of play all over the court
All in all the Bobcats are very Kahn team….their frontcout feels like everyone is 7 feet tall and hustles their brains off
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
how much does it cost to have 5 LP teams?
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
$109, versus $169 for all teams on broadband (there is no 5-team option for TV)
Or you can get all teams for $40 on an iPad or smartphone/iPod touch.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
i might just buy an ipad so that i can watch games while i’m at work! that sounds like a phenomenal deal
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:24 AM CST up reply actions
I actually tried the same math
as an excuse to get an iPad. I don’t think I can bring myself to do it, but it is a good idea.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:33 AM CST up reply actions
A guy who can bite that hard on a fake
And STILL catch up to a player as quick and big as Bosh to stuff him is absolutely incredible.
Interviewer: Can you understand why teams value potential ahead of experience and accomplishment in the draft? Wes Johnson: "Yeah. I understand. It’s the youngness of everything – older guys like young women, so it’s the same way."
by Xand1 on Dec 30, 2011 3:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I've gotta think we're going to get a SG before the deadline
I’d go after Ben Gordon if he’s available for Wes + salary. He’s overpaid, but he’s not bad, and Detroit needs to clear space for their young guards to play.
Gordon had some good years in Chicago...
…but he has suuuuuuuucccckkkkkkkked in a really big way in Detroit. I wonder how much it has to do with…well, he scares me at this point. It used to be there, but last year he had a .037 ws/48. That’s horrifying territory.
His trend line is not good
WS/48 since 2008-09: 0.110, 0.059, 0.037, -0.028 (this year, small sample). But then again, Wes put up a 0.03 and at least Gordon has been good and is probably gettable.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
He's no sure thing
But he’s almost certainly gettable for very little. Looking at most of his stats, it’s hard to see why he’s getting worse… the only things that really jump out at me are that his usage % has declined significantly since he left the bulls, and last year his assist % dove while his TO % rose.
He’s not old, and he doesn’t really appear to my eyes to be much of a different player than he was with the Bulls. I’d gamble that he was just a terrible fit for Detroit. At worst he’s a bad contract that we can dump in a couple years.
I'd probably take my chances on him versus status quo,
but I’d shop around before I settled dealing for him.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
Sure, I'd definitely shop for something better
Just trying to throw something out there that’s realistically attainable with what we have. I can’t see us getting Kevin Martin or Eric Gordon for scraps.
What do you think a best case type player for us is? I’m assuming we don’t trade Love, Rubio or Williams (although I’m fine w/ trading Williams).
I'm just guessing,
but without giving up Williams, I’d say that Ben Gordon or Salmons are the kinds of players we’re looking at. Best case? Maybe Jason Richardson if the Magic give up on being good and start unloading every contract they can.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:36 AM CST up reply actions
I'd take J-Rich
Think I’d prefer taking a shot on Gordon to Salmons, but there’s not a lot of difference there.
The only reason I’m leaving Williams out is that I think we’d be better served trading him for a legit starting center (Gortat?) and trying to fill the SG position with our scraps.
would J Rich actually be better than Thabo? or is Thabo just not in consideration because we don’t think the Thunder would trade him?
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
thabo can do those as well, AND defend like a beast.
he just doesnt shoot because he plays with Durant and Westbrook
I don't hate Thabo
I just don’t think he’s in the same ballpark as Richardson. Thabo is quite limited, and he’s more valuable to a team that doesn’t need him to produce much offensively.
Coaching and fit
there are players like Love that are just too good and it doesn’t matter….but for everyone else it’s coaching and fit
Since he’s been in Detroit both have been bad for Gordon
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions
Lou Williams, Jodie Meeks, Evan Turner – Philly is stacked at guard with Holliday and Iguodala as well. All of these players are productive and they could use a big guy.
A Gortat+Childress package to help jumpstart a Phoenix rebuild if Nash and Hill start to show their age.
Michael Beasley is a Small Forward. Derrick Williams is a Power Forward.
Yes
They are loaded with 1/2s. I’d be calling about..Meeks, perhaps, as he is probably the most attainable. I’d be pretty ecstatic to get him for anything outside of Love/Rubio/Williams.
by WolvesFan03 on Dec 30, 2011 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
Haven’t really watched Meeks play, but I always though he was just Wayne Ellington from a different tradition-laden program
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:56 AM CST up reply actions
Superficially, they look similar if you look at per game stats in the pros
But Meeks is much more efficient and productive on a per-play basis. Meeks takes a much higher percentage of three-point shots, and he gets to the line at about twice the rate (although that isn’t so hard to do because wayne’s FTA rate is miniscule).
ORTG and WS/48 bear out the difference:
Meeks 2010-2011 (ORTG, WS/48): 112, .104
Wayne 2010-2011 (ORTG, WS/48): 100, .013
DRTG and WS also seem to think Meeks is a better defender, although I haven’t seen enough of Meeks to comment on that.
by WolvesFan03 on Dec 30, 2011 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
I think Meeks is actually what a lot of people wanted Wayne to be
A good shooter who takes a high percentage of his shots from 3, defends reasonably well, and doesn’t turn the ball over.
by WolvesFan03 on Dec 30, 2011 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
Yea, wayne’s affection for the long 2 is strange…. the only time i’m ok with the long 2 is if the defender is just completely sagging because he doesn’t think that you’re going to take the shot cause you’re just inside the 3 pt line… but everyone knows wayne likes that shot, so it’s never open
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
You can make up all the stats you want but Kevin Love’s presence on the defense and of the court is nothing compared to what KG was and that’s why this team is not going to be a winner unless someone better than Love arrives. In this era where one player can make a huge difference Love has only proven capable of amassing stats stats for himself that while impressive, don’t add up in the win column.
K-Love is no KG
you want to talk about overvalued assets and K-Love is the epitome of overvalued. A guy who doens’t win games but could be in-line for a max contract. Trade him, get better at multiple positions and I’m willing to bet we’ll win some games.
World-class trolling here.
Setting up an ID today, with the handle specifically tailored toward this post, to start a fight. Clap. Clap. Clap.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
+10
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions
the ID is the clincher
Nomorelove is brilliant
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions
I've multiple times thought about getting "MalcomLeeFever" as an ID
then I thought I should wait till he plays a NBA minute
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
by VoodooMagic on Dec 30, 2011 11:10 AM CST up reply actions
I stopped posting under
ImGonnaLuvJonny pretty quickly.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
Thanks
My Id refers to DeMarcus Love who I don’t want to play guard for the Vikings, thank you!!
that's a lot of negativity for one day.
Wolves…NO LOVE
Vikes…NO LOVE
Tell me, why would someone create their handle based off of DeMarcus Love?
"My love for Jerry Kill knows no bounds." - Jeffrick
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 30, 2011 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
I assumed it was an ID related to Hideo Nomo's return to the Dodgers in 2002. "Nomo relove."
We love you all over again, Hideo!
"Opinion ...a confession."
by feral on Dec 30, 2011 11:17 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Don't cry because you don't like the opinion
This team has 17 wins and K-Love has not proven himself capable of elevating the play of this team. If he was really that good his team would be better. Trying to throw it off to other players is a cop out.
Because you have no real argument
the loses are just staring you in the face. I know you want to go into a long dissertation on how amazing his rebounding is and how efficient a scorer he is. But at the end of the day his defense is terrible and win-loss wise his team isn’t much better off than before he arrived.
It’s OK though, K-Love will continue to have big games and in your heart you can feel good about that. Who knows maybe one day a real franchsie player will come here actually lead the team to victories and K-Love will put up big numbers. Then you can create an I told you so comment and I’ll feel terrible. for not buying into Love.
You have to admit, MD,
that the loses are just staring you in the face.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Like I said no real argument
But you can always link back to the blog and have a feel good moment.
I'll give you an A for effort.
Feel better?
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
wait, do you guys really think Kevin Love is as good as Kevin Garnett was? is that what the argument is about?
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
What argument?
No sane person would make that argument
Kevin Love is 1,000 times better than Kevin Garnett ever was
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
by littleboxes on Dec 30, 2011 2:40 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
why do you think KG left town?
he knew who was coming…
There is no argument.
There is only a troll.
by Madison Dan on Dec 30, 2011 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
"I'll give you an A for effort. Feel better?"
This is what my wife says to stop my sobbing after our lovemaking.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Hah!
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 30, 2011 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
Welcome back
chuckd!
The capitalization and improved grammar almost threw me off.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
SNP
what was your position on trading Al way back in the day, and do you still agree with what you thought then?
I felt like trading Al wasn’t a big enough part of the this post… I thought that we definitely didn’t get enough out of that trade personally. Maybe I was just completely overvaluing what we could get for Al, but I didn’t think that we got enough (basically we got a lot of cap space and some draft picks – maybe)
Lot of water under that bridge.
As of the trade, Stop-n-Pop’s take was:
If they are able to use the cap space…
…for someone like Iggy or Josh Smith (just as an example) + Ridnour, this essentially becomes Al and 2 2nd rounders for Beasley, Iggy/Smith, Ridnour, and 2 1sts. Granted, they’d need a bit on the free agent deal to make the salaries match, but this is essentially part of a non-simultaneous trade for the Wolves. He needs to make the back half happen, but this is far and away the most value they can get from Jefferson’s bloated contract. It has always been the best route.
And then we got to waiting for the “back half,” in the form of that “singular move,” I believe….
"Opinion ...a confession."
hmm
yea… in hindsight, the cap space has never turned into s***
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
by the way
i owe you a thank you, i’ve spoken english my entire life, and just looked up and found what water under the bridge means. thanks yahoo answers.
i will not bring up the subject again
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
Everybody knows that
“water under the bridge” refers to an act of feminine hygiene.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Is that
for cleaning up a bad case of Garfunkel?
by Dr. Wolfenstein on Dec 30, 2011 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I thought it was a sex act
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
River metaphors have a rich history here in Wolves fandom.
I used to watch Corey Brewer play and regularly trot out “This river is never the same twice” aphorisms.
"Opinion ...a confession."
Heraclitus is our friend.
You cannot put a bad draft pick in the same team twice.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 31, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions
What would Heraclitus have told us about Joe Smith? Huh? Tell me that, Mr. Philosopher who hurts feelings!
Wouldn’t he have said Joe Smith wasn’t the same player the second time anyway?
From the first quotes page I find, other Heraclitus words touching the Smith saga:
Big results require big ambitions. (“Yeah it’s wrong, but we want a championship.”)
Eyes and ears are poor witnesses to people if they have uncultured souls. (So, you write down the “contracts.” This is an agent, after all.)
Hide our ignorance as we will, an evening of wine soon reveals it. (They’re gonna find those deals you signed in your ignorance, Glen.)
It is hard to contend against one’s heart’s desire; for whatever it wishes to have it buys at the cost of soul.
Justice will overtake fabricators of lies and false witnesses.
If only we educated people in the classics!
(I found myself saying “Damn straight, Heraclitus!” to several of his little aphorisms. "We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the child at play." Yeah. Point to the Greek fellah.)
"Opinion ...a confession."
Feral brings up the back-half that never happened
But I was completely wrong about being ok with trading Al. Back halves, trade exceptions, cap space. It never gets utilized like you think it will when you sell yourself on the idea that getting rid of a good player is a good idea.
Love is their centerpiece, they need to surround him with average-to-above-average player. A healthy Jefferson was an above average player. The most common argument I see from Wolves fans who fondly remember KG and don’t like the idea that Love can put up similar production is that Love somehow doesn’t improve the game of those around him or that his rebounding doesn’t produce victories. A rookie Love + a healthy Jefferson + solid production from a guard (Foye, in this case) and a wing (Carney, in this case) led to the last winning month in team history. Small sample size, yeah, but it’s not like his time at UCLA or next to decent amounts of average-to-above-average production haven’t produced wins. Does he look like KG? No. Does he defend like KG? Of course not. He scores ugly points with ugly rebounds and, oh by the way, he seems to have a hankering for improving his game each offseason.
I can listen to the argument that Jefferson’s knee was never going to allow him to be good again, but I don’t think that’s why he was let go for basically nothing.
agreed with that first part completely. I think David Kahn legit thought that the back half would come too.
I definitely think Love is good, and we should not trade him unless it’s for someone like Dwight Howard. I just think KG was one of the best of all time, which I don’t think Love will be.
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:02 PM CST up reply actions
Labels are labels are labels
KG was/is great. He is the best player in franchise history and there were times when it seemed like he could put the entire world on his back while carrying his team to victory.
That being said, I think people have fuzzy memories when it comes to the quality of his supporting cast and how that compares to what Love has had to play with.
KG’s first playoff run had Googs and Dean Garrett. Both were really good players. He even had a rookie Steph. He then got to play with Terry Porter and Smitch. Then Terrell Brandon and Joe Smith. These are good players. Really good in some cases. All the while he was brought along slowly, with vets to look out over him while he improved his game.
In that last year, a 22 year old KG posted a line that wasn’t as good as what we saw last year with a 22 year old Love. The team was better because it had better players. KG was allowed to grow into the WCF/MVP monster because of stuff like this (and because he is insanely talented).
Next year, Wally came on board and Sealy was really good before he was killed. (This was also Brandon’s peak.) Chauncey came along the next year.
It goes on and on and on and on. He had good players around him. He was still only good enough to get beat down by the Spurs, Blazers, etc in the 1st round.
It took them getting another player playing at a superstar level (Cassell was abso-f’ing-lutely nuts that year), above average wing play from Spree and The Mayor, and competent center play (Ervin had a good year) to make it beyond the 1st round. It took all of this plus the best year in the franchise’s best player’s career to get beyond the 1st round (It should have been obvious by this point that no competent GM should ever hire Flip Saunders as a head coach, FWIW). KG was great, but to think that he did it on his own or that he could do it without other superstar-level production next to him is just revisionist history.
Love had Anthony Tolliver last year. That’s it. He was “coached” by a guy who has a legit claim to worst coach in NBA history. It’s not like other people have a problem seeing how good he has always been. Top recruit, UCLA Final Four, Team USA. He is a stunningly good player and, I know it is weird to think of it this way, he is producing at a level above and beyond a young KG. He just has nothing—absolutely nothing—around him. Hopefully that changes with Rubio and Williams or whatever they can flip them for.
I don’t think there is any question K Love has a WAY worse supporting cast than KG. I also know that with KG, who I think is one of the best players in the world EVER, he had that supporting cast, and he didn’t win.
I think one of the toughest parts of trying to spell out some sort of PLAN that works for everything is that what it took to beat the Lakers in those days, is much different than what it will take to beat the Heat or the Thunder these days. (and also what it takes to beat the Thunder is much different than what it takes to beat the Heat)
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:31 PM CST up reply actions
You don't hear much about it now that he's moved on for a few years..
…but there used to be a lot of talk around town about how KG wasn’t cut out for winning because he “couldn’t take over in the 4th”, “didn’t have #1 option talent” and so on and so forth. His game was every bit as weird as Love’s. It had holes and, at the end of the day, it only got the team 1 real crack…well, they won 2 games in the WCF. He needed to be surrounded by 2 awesome perimeter players and, apparently, a freakish point guard.
He definitely was one of the best players in the world, ever. He still had flaws and needed some pretty specific help. I don’t get why people can’t see this same sort of action with Love.
Also, there is no such thing as a plan. Just get good, smart, talented, and competent people and let them work. That’s the plan.
I always though KG was a #1. My dad was one of the people who talked about the 4th quarter.
KG was the best team defender i’ve ever watched with my eyes, he was a great passer, and he was a good scorer for the first 46 mins of the game. To me a #1 is complete…. Dwight Howard is also not a reliable 4th quarter scoring option, but he puts up points, and he plays great defense.
I don’t see the same completeness to Love’s game. I know advanced statisics say otherwise, but I don’t give adv stats as much weight in basketball as I do in a game like baseball. I’ve watched him play since he was at UCLA, and I just don’t see him as a legit #1.
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
Just replace...
…“legit #1” with “banana sandwich”. They share the same importance. It doesn’t matter what you call these guys. Just as long as they’re really, really good, you try to accumulate as many as possible.
so are you willing to trade love and pieces for a banana sandwich/legit #1, assuming the legit #1 would stay?
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:51 PM CST up reply actions
assuming the pieces aren’t DWill or Rubio…
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
The point here is that "legit #1" is a made up term
Insert “flibbyfus” instead. Get good players. When you have an awesome one, don’t let go.
by Stop-n-Pop on Dec 30, 2011 12:56 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
play the game, would you trade Love Beasley Malcolm Lee and Darko for Dwight, assuming he’d stay. I would.
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
(for the record, I didn’t look into the salaries, I’m just saying philosophically)
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
Did you do any research about the potential salaries of banana sandwiches?
"Opinion ...a confession."
I'm loving
the “banana sandwich” bit.
"Of what use is a philosopher who does not hurt anybody's feelings?" -Diogenes of Sinope
by Cynical Jason on Dec 31, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions
They have their Dwight
Dwight is really, really good and better than Love at this stage in his career, but they produce at similar net levels. The trick is getting someone else to surround that really great player. This is where the Wolves constantly screw up.
Dirk is not exactly a stout defender either, and he's still a banana sandwich
I do think KG’s defensive play is a notable difference between him, dirk, and Love, but the production for all players is still elite The trick with Love, as was the trick with Dirk and KG, is to put the right players around him.
Gary, you didn't kill your brother. Those gorillas did.
I think you're missing the point of the banana sandwich bit
The point is that you may as well call “legit #1” a “banana sandwich” because both are meaningless terms when describing certain types of really good basketball players.
we get the banana sandwich bit, but we still wanna talk about #1s :) but now instead call them banana sandwiches
i like that plan… I think Beasley, Love, DWill, Lee, and Rubio, Tolliver (to some extent) fit that. everyone else… meh
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
No this team needs a legit number 1
That’s your mistake, you think Love is a player that you build around when in fact he’s the type of guy you bring in to play off of an elite player. He can still be very good and be a piece of the puzzle rather than the centerpiece.
Just because he’s the best you have doesn’t mean he’s the guy you build around no more than when Al Jefferson was the best you had.
Do you really think that this team can be a contender if Love is the best player on the team?
I've seen one
lick his his balls before. When I asked him why he did that, he said, “Because I can.”
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Best explanation of trolling ever.
by BenLayne23 on Dec 30, 2011 12:22 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Jesus.
I feel like I woke up next to that a time or two in college. Beer is a bitch sometimes.
And when you joked "I sure wish I could do that"
he said, “Go ahead. Here, let me roll over first”.
LOL, can't handle others that don't agree with you
It’s cool, I know it’s easier to converse with yes men.
Yes,
it is.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
Rec'd.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
by PoorDick on Dec 30, 2011 1:01 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Easy with those
I’m trying to stay in a lower tax bracket this year.
Tune in this week to "At the Movies With MAYNHOLUP and Jonny Flynn":
Jonny: OMG Salt was so good Angeline Jolie kicked some serious butt in that movie
MAYNHOLUP: mayn fuck u Jonny Flynn
before the dallas mavericks won last year, i would’ve said no
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
In the same way that the Wolves were a contender a grand total of once throughout the KG years...
1 on 5 doesn’t work at this level.
600 N First Ave "like a Pirate's cove".
the argument is not for 1 on 5, if i understand correctly, it’s that no legit #1 does not work at this level either
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
which i would tend to agree with, before I saw the Mavs win last year
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
Sheed and Dirk are pretty good top options
(although Chauncey was a 1B option if there ever was one)
I think Sheed had legit #1 talent, but was not a legit number 1, especially when he was on the Pistons… and I don’t think Dirk is a legit #1. (i think what a legit #1 is a completely different discussion)
If we’re arguing about whether Dirk can score with the best of em, that’s for darn sure. Did I ever think a team could win a championship with Dirk as the best player? no. I thought if it was going to happen, it would’ve happened when Dwyane murdered them 4 games in a row 5 years ago (or whenever that was).
I don’t think there are 30 #1s in the league, and I also used to think it took a #1 to win the ship, but I don’t think that anymore.
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
2005/6 should have been...
…your first clue that Dirk could, at the very least, get within 1 game of winning it all. Last year he simply didn’t have to play against 80 Wade FTA every quarter to bring it on home. ;)
You are 100% right that there are not 30 #1s in the league. There aren’t 30 on the planet. That being said, I’m pretty confident that Kevin Love is one of the planet’s 30 best basketball players. Whatever it is we want to call him, he’s the best player that the folks at 600 First Avenue are going to get their hands on and it would behoove them to make the most of the opportunity while not trying to create things they don’t have access to out of thin air.
agreed, we should not trade K Love, unless it gets us a legit #1, which I would then be ok with.
For the record, on paper, I thought Dirk’s 05/06 team was better, but I also reallllly liked Josh Howard
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:34 PM CST up reply actions
You are not going to get a number 1 in a trade (it’s just highly unlikely) but you can continue to improve you overall talent level and potentially add the pick that could turn into a number one by trading the one player that has any real market value. On a 17 win team there really should be no sacred cows and you have to keep churning the talent pool until you start to see some progress in the win loss column.
that’s fine theoretically, but this is real life, not fantasy
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
The fantasy is that you can build around a guy that could only get you one of the NBA’s worst records over the past two years. The fantasy is thinking you can get valuable assets in exchange for junk.
spell out the second sentence, i dont get what that refers to.
first sentence, agreed you can’t build AROUND love, but you can certainly build with him
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:50 PM CST up reply actions
You could if you had other assets but realistically what do you have? No first round pick this year. Rubio and Williams ability to bring back legit players is questionable but might net you picks. Rubio plays a spot you desperately need filled and he can fill the seats at Target center so he’s not a likley trade candidate. Everyhting else on your roster is about as low value as it gets. Unless we are talking about a salary dump player we are not getting anything of immediate value outside of trading K-Love.
agreed we can’t get good value for any of our players… i don’t think trading Love is the answer though.
It may or may not be but realistically the downside to trading him is not that large and if you can get assets that may fit better with what you have it may be the better long term move. Bottom line it’s something the organization should be open to as opposed to devoting a large chunk of the cap to a player who has not proven himself capable of helping you win more games
i think there’s huge downside to trading Love for several people of lesser talent (vs packaging him to get somebody AWESOME)
If the wolves traded Love for a decent SG and a decent C and it didn’t produce something phenomenal, i would not renew my season tix.
i think people lose jobs for trading players like kevin love (without much success)
also… can we just throw out the idea that you can’t legitimately get a #1 in a trade? I think that’s been proven false
by nharabadger on Dec 30, 2011 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
It happens but it’s rare and for small market teams it’s even more rare. Your basicaly hoping that a guy plays way above what he was with his former team.
But what about a legit number 1????
What about it? We need to have a number 1 before we have a number 2! And if we accidentally get 3 ahead of two we’re likely to cross the beams and blow up the universe.
Imaginary titles for make-believe things are just that.
You’d be just as well off debating the meaning of the word hornswaggle.
AJeff
probably is available
Do you think TWolves should bite
by WinTheLottery on Dec 30, 2011 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
Nomorelove is no more
If you’re going to troll here, at least be a little more clever about it
Follow me on Twitter @timallenonline

by 














