Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Please Kahn, For Once Take the Best Player..

First off Corey Brewer has 2 NCAA titles and 1 NBA Championship to his credentials, now that I have your attention I would like to share my opinion on the Wolves and their upcoming 2nd pick of this year's draft.  keep in mind this is only one man's opinion, and I am just trying to more or less see what other Wolf fan's opinions are slash try to change the some minds. 

Why are we so ready to give up the 2nd pick in a two player draft?  I'm really confused by this!  To say that we need to draft according to needs just about boggles my mind.  We were 17-65 last year with in my opinion pretty good talent, something didn't mesh.  I am big on the whole Rambis is a terrible coach thing as well, and do not think they should have been running a triangle offense, but you cannot teach defense and the Wolves had zero D.  In my opinion every spot on the floor is up for grabs except for PG because of Rubio.  I am not saying that Rubio is going to come in and instantly change things, but you know he is going to get a ton of exceptions because he is part of Kahn's master plan.  I think that if Kahn ended his career today (a boy can dream) his legacy would consist of many mistakes and then stealing Beasley for a second round pick.  From watching last years season there is no doubt that this boy can play and he is really fun to watch.  I would never want to give up on him because there were flashes of pure dominance in his game and he is still really young.  I also saw some brilliance from Anthony Randolph last year, which would be another Kahn move that I actually didn't SMH to mainly because I have been a huge Corey Brewer hater since about 2009.  So obviously we have some talent in the area of the 3 and 4 position, and the potential is to the extreme, but are these the players that are gonna turn around the franchise? from the looks of last year, no!

Maybe the final straw for me was the Sport Science episode recently played with Derrick Williams on, in which they compared his jump shot to Kevin Durant.  Or maybe I am just a firm believer that every team should draft the BPA in any sport, does not matter what the situation is.  But I think passing up on D-Will will be a huge mistake for this franchise.  I get that trading the pick for a "franchise player" would be more than ideal, but who is out there?  Iggy? Granger? These are good basketball players, do not get me wrong, but what have they done so far for their organizations, a couple playoff appearances here and there?  They are basketball players, sure, but they are not winners.  And who is to say that any of these players would ever come play for (according to ESPN the Magazine) the 5th worst franchise in all of the 4 major sports organizations.  I hate when people say that Derrick Williams is a PF because he is 6'9", I also hate when people call Beasley a PF they are both way to athletic for that position.  They are both above average ball handlers and are both great at slashing to the basket.  Anthony Randolph is PF, Kevin Love is PF but that's only because he is tiny and has zero leaping ability and would get dominated by every decent center in the league.  One thing that I cannot stand about Beasley is the game has to move around him, he is nothing without the basketball.  If you have ever seen Kevin Durant (6'11" SF) play basketball, he is constantly moving without the basketball.  I think that Williams can be this type of player, super fast for his size, crazy leaping ability, and a very quick and accurate jump shot, not to mention his range.  I also think that Beasley and Williams can play together especially with Rubio.  Rubio is going to be a player that slashes to the basket and then dishes the ball to either a perimeter shooter or a big guy underneath the basket.   All I know is that having 2 big targets that can play both on the perimeter and underneath the basket seem pretty intriguing to me.

All I am saying is that it is extremely worth seeing what kind of player D-Will can be, and if he can live up to his potential.  So please David, draft this kid!   I had to cut this short because I am in a hurry.  What are your opinions on this?

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Selecting the BPA is easy...

Identifying the BPA is much more difficult.

There are a lot of reasons why people don’t see Derrick Williams as a clear BPA kind of player.

by vjl110 on Jun 16, 2011 12:52 PM CDT reply actions   2 recs

That is exactly what I was going to say.

I am not at all convinced that Derrick Williams is or should be considered BPA at 2. The primary problem is that he could well be… or he could be 4th or 5th.

by Krotz the Wall on Jun 16, 2011 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Come on...did you really not know what he was trying to say?

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Jun 16, 2011 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

you are not alone!

I haven't written an insightful post in years.

by littleboxes on Jun 16, 2011 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

No I'm sure you're not alone,

you’re just the minority. Most people call this a clear 1-2 draft, that’s all.

But at least we all agree that BPA should be chosen. And if somebody believes Biyombo is BPA at #2, bless their heart.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Jun 16, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

No doubt it is a minority opinion...

but given the quality of most basketball analysis, I am cool with that.

When BPA means draft who you think will be the best NBA player I am all for it. When it means, draft who ESPN thinks will be the best player, I have no respect for it.

BTW, there is absolutely a legitimate argument for D-Will as the #2… I just think it is inferior to the argument for Biyombo and Val.

by vjl110 on Jun 16, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't realize you wanted Biyombo at 2.

Or I wouldn’t have said “bless their heart” so condescendingly. My bad lol.

I’d be happy with you guys picking Biyombo @ 2.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Jun 16, 2011 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

I’m pretty sure Canis Hoopus is the only place where anyone sees Biyombo as the 2nd best prospect, but it is certainly a popular theme around here. His ACB numbers are awesome, his NHS performance was awesome, his physical profile is without peer, he has a great attitude about basketball, coaches seem to fall in love with him…

We will see how things play out three years from now.

by vjl110 on Jun 16, 2011 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

According to our crowdsourced board...

…Williams was #2 and Biyombo was #4… right?

by Boss10 on Jun 16, 2011 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think so..

but my sense is that the more vocal members of the community would be split between Biyombo and Williams at the 2.

by vjl110 on Jun 16, 2011 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is their a post threshold that gets one more votes in said polls. I need a target. Maybe this is VoodooMagic’s strategy…

Derrick Williams is going to Bust...as a Small Forward.

by Ebomb on Jun 16, 2011 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've been back and forth on Jonas.

His contract is my major concern. We CANNOT suffer/wait another 1-3 years with Clippergeddon coming.

It’s also part of the reason Biyombo scares me. He’s young and won’t contribute to a lot of wins, starting next year. Williams and Kanter seem better in this regard. 3 years from now? Who knows.

by Boss10 on Jun 17, 2011 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am fan of whatever team drafts him

I haven't written an insightful post in years.

by littleboxes on Jun 16, 2011 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we're really thinking about Kanter

then we might as well just move Love to Center and draft Williams to be our PF. Kanter is not a defender and Williams is a better prospect.

For the loser now
Will be later to win

by John Wall on Jun 16, 2011 12:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Problem is

Williams isn’t much of a defender, either.

...so long as they get a real guard

by jianfu on Jun 16, 2011 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

How do you know

that he is not a defender? He could be a bad defender. He could be a so-so defender. He could be a good defender. He is only 19 or 20 years old. I am not saying he will, but could he not improve his defensive abilities. He is big and by all accounts, has very good offensive skills. I am not as opposed to Kanter as some. As I said he is a big and we need a big. As the team now stands, I think Kanter would not be a bad choice.

by Foul line on Jun 16, 2011 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

People that actually have scouted him in the past

all say he is not a defender. Even saying he is “disinterested” in that part of the game. Kanter = Big Al Jeff part deux. He has a crap wingspan and average athleticism. It will be a small miracle if Kanter is even a solid defender.

For the loser now
Will be later to win

by John Wall on Jun 16, 2011 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

Sad to see that the only position that is not up for grabs (in your opinion) is PG and Rubio. Are you kidding, LOVE was an ALL-STAR last year and by far the BEST player that we have.
But I agree! DW is by far the BPA if he is their at 2. watch for yourself

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjXBQDsTTug

Don’t pull a PORTLAND and take Sam Bowie because it was a need and you had Drexler who played the same position. HELLO you passed on JORDAN, worst Draft debockle of all time. Not saying that DW will be Jordan by any strech of the imagination, but you get my point. Don’t tell me you can’t rotate, Love, Beasley, and DW just think about the athletes on the floor and the depth on the Bench.

by D-Bush on Jun 16, 2011 1:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Williams is Michael Jordan?

I haven't written an insightful post in years.

by littleboxes on Jun 16, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

smh

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Jun 16, 2011 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Bowie premise....

That was a big blunder and thye went for need……but what about when teams basically regarded Darko or Olawakandi as the BPA? Derrick Williams as the pick on a team with a bunch of forwards only makes sense if you can turn around and get need for trading one of those forwards. If the Wolves think they can do that, great. But if you put in Williams for Beasley you basically have the same product you had last year plus Rubio.

If Williams is the pick, they have to have a plan for how to handle his minutes and get some kind of value for Johnson,Beasley, Randolph or whomever they have that somebody might be interested.

Rubio is not a sure thing (although I hope he is a solid upgrade) so if we are going to pick another forward this team will not get significantly better until they can also upgrade center or shooting guard. And next year we have no pick.

by Darth Tugits on Jun 16, 2011 2:30 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Ok, It seems to

Kanter measured in height at 6’9.75" without shoes and 6’11.25" with shoes. He weighed in at 259.2 pounds and measured a wing span of 7’1.5". What team wouldn’t want a player like that?

The player who was stuck on the sidelines at Kentucky last season because he was ruled ineligible, measured out quite well, standing 6-foot-11 ¼ in shoes and weighing in at 259 pounds while proving to be incredibly well-conditioned. His body fat was just 5.9 percent, or a little more than half of expected No. 1 pick and former Duke point guard Kyrie Irving (10.2).

He lasted approximately 21 minutes on a brutal treadmill test that includes steep inclines, declines and sprints, putting himself atop the big man class when it comes to being dedicated about his body.

He went 21-plus minutes on the treadmill test, and only five guys — plus Enes — [did that] and four of them were guards," Ergul told SI.com. "[NBA officials] said that was the first time in the draft in modern history that had happened, that no 6-11-plus guys ever finished 21-minutes-plus on the treadmill test

ESPN: Scouts believe Kanter is NBA-ready. His body is pretty mature. He’s strong and isn’t afraid to play physical basketball. And he’s highly skilled for a big man. Scouts said they thought he was more NBA-ready than Greg Monroe, Ed Davis or Cole Aldrich … all of whom went in the lottery in a stronger draft.

 2011 NBA Draft Scouting Report: Enes Kanter Summary: Despite being ruled ineligible at Kentucky this past season, Enes Kanter remains the best big man prospect in the 2011 NBA Draft class. He possesses the size and post game of someone well beyond his years and should be a top-five pick come June.

 Player Comparison: Tim Duncan. Before I get lit up for this comparison, I am in no way implying that Kanter is going to be the next Tim Duncan, but rather the two have fairly similar games. Like the Big Fundamental, Kanter shows great maturity at a young age, ability to rebound, mid-range game and intelligence.

Duncan has never been by any stretch of the imagination one of the most athletic big men around, and neither will Kanter, but still maximizes the abilities that have made him one of the top post players in the league for more than a decade. Kanter will likely never be in that category, but should be a quality big man for years to come.

by Foul line on Jun 16, 2011 3:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Sorry, I messed up on my previous post.

I intended to say at the beginning of that post that yes, there are legitimate concerns about kanter as there are about all of them. However, many seem to focus on these concerns and on the negative and fail to at least look at the positives and the potential of such a young player as Kanter.

So, in the post I copied and pasted some positive observations. I know full well that there are negatives out there and they should be considered. I just think the positves need to be looked at as well.

Again, sorry I messed up.

by Foul line on Jun 16, 2011 3:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Here are the #2 overall picks since the turn of the century:

‘10 Evan Turner
’’09 Hasheem Thabeet
’08 Michael Beasley
’07 Kevin Durant
’06 LMA
’05 Marvin Williams
’04 Emeka Okafur
’03 Darko Milicic
’02 Jay Williams
’01 Tyson Chandler
’00 Stromile Swift

I’m fairly certain in June of those respective years, all these guys were considered the BPA. And yes, sometimes those were simply dumb teams making dumb decisions, but last I checked over at 600 First Avenue…

...so long as they get a real guard

by jianfu on Jun 16, 2011 4:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Yep, as vjl said, picking the BPA is easy, identifying him is hard

Of those #2 picks, the only one that is a top 1 or 2 talent is Durant.

Which says to me, that it might not be stupid to at least consider need when drafting. The only thing we know for sure is that we really don’t know who the BPA is at #2, luck plays a big part. Of course, better analysis, like SnP does, helps. That is where we need to focus some effort.

It would be interesting to see the top 5 players drafted in each of those years, and see which slot yielded the best payer

by timmuggs on Jun 16, 2011 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jay Williams was going to be a stud.

Unfortunately for Chicago he made a poor decision off of the court and it ruined a promising career. If he hadn’t injured himself in a motorcycle accident he had the acumen to be on the level of Derrick Rose, Deron Williams, or John Wall.

Toddler Riley Scientist

by ynotsema2 on Jun 16, 2011 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

BPA's not so much

Thabeet – no way he was BPA, Thabeet was drafted on size alone
Marvin Williams – Drafted on pure potential, wasn’t even the BPA from his school
Darko – no one had darko ahead of Carmelo on their board they were purely drafting on needs, somehow paid off that year I think they would take melo or wade if they could do it over though
Jay Williams – was the BPA
Tyson Chandler – There were tons of mistakes in this draft
Swift – drafted ahead of Darius Miles (the BPA) no comment!

by BenjGold12 on Jun 16, 2011 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hindsight is a stinky cologne

or something like that…

Derrick Williams is going to Bust...as a Small Forward.

by Ebomb on Jun 16, 2011 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow, you are a marketing genius!

A cologne name Hindsight would be awesome, especially if it were stinky.

In some circles, anyway…

You should trademark that.

by timmuggs on Jun 16, 2011 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Looks like it's available

However “In Hindsight – It’s your duty to check your booty” is already trademarked

Derrick Williams is going to Bust...as a Small Forward.

by Ebomb on Jun 16, 2011 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tyson Chandler is Dirks MVP

13 points 12 rebounds per 36 and .654 shooting percentage. Of course he’s nobody to ESPN because he doesn’t score enough Just plays really good D and has had a solid career and high wins produced.

by mr.sorbet on Jun 16, 2011 7:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Canis Hoopus is straight T-Wolves straight from Minnesota.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rubio_wolfrider_small
2011/2012 Rookie Review
Abby_s_030_small
Top Ten Reasons David Kahn is a Better Basketball Mind than Sam Presti
Rubio_wolfrider_small
Ricky Rubio: Probably not as good as you think...
Small
Around the League: Atlanta Hawks

Recent FanPosts

Rubio_wolfrider_small
PA100 Atlantic Division
Small
End of Dan Harmon - Community
New_look_primary_logo_1989-96_100_small
Jae Crowder participated in NJ combine...
Small
Possible that Perry Jones = Paul George?
Small
Evan Fournier
557415_10101880206283470_13960869_76835255_1401292386_n_small
Poll: Do the NBA playoffs live up to their potential?
Rubio_wolfrider_small
PA100 Northwest Division

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Canis Hoopus Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Hoopus Features

    HOOPUS FAQ

    Salary Cap Info

    Draft Info

    Player Movement Flow Charts

    Draft Boards

    Former Tag Lines:

    • In desperate need of an epic dose of basketball Viagra
    • Your source of radical left wing politics cleverly disguised as basketball fandom
    • Palin-Free since before statehood
    • Despairy Home Companion
    • The world's leading exporter of small area quickness
    • Sorry…I have no idea who is Joe Mauer
    • Home of the Peja deep douche
    • Vote McGrady!
    • Bork, bork, bork, bork, bork
    • Wir Sind Darko
    • Weird, unhealthy Darko mania
    • les goûts et les couleurs ne se discutent pas
    • Basketball success makes character issues forgivable
    • Building the Boogie Bandwagon
    • Building the Dream....One Power Forward At A Time
    • Kids, Puppy Dogs, And Long Walks In The Park
    • SWITCH THE FLIP!!!
    • Team Red Pill.
    • December is Bunny Month. Survive it with insincerity and Merle Haggard.
    • Like having a really good seat at a beheading.
    • We've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we're not savages. We're Wolves fans, and Wolves fans are best at everything.
    • Getting Real Mythological
    • Trapped in Punxsawawney
    • BIIYYYOOOMMMBOOOOOOO!!!
    • Estoy llevando mi talento a Minnesota
    • Where sharks do battle with giant eagles
    • You don’t put a saddle and reins on a magical unicorn, you bareback it and put faith in nature
    • Toeing the line between nerd and loser
    • If Theo Ratliff’s Expiring Contract could see us now...

    Hoopus Recipe Book

    Let's Settle This:


    Self-Promotion

    BallHype Sports Blog Rankings


    Managers

    Dr wyn

    Journey_small Stop-n-Pop

    Rviy7fbgmhz5ht2dpgo6q0jfu_small TimAllen

    Editors

    Wolveslogo_small Oceanary

    Authors

    Small SG

    Hrbek_small Jon Marthaler