Report Card: Wolves @ Rockets
Well, our Wolves are a pretty capable team aren't they? Here's the box score for your convenience.
|
MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES (10-11) |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIELD GOALSREBOUNDS | |||||||||||||||||
| POS | MIN | FGM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | +/- | OFF | DEF | TOT | AST | PF | ST | TO | BS | BA | PTS | ||
| W. Johnson | G-F | 20:20 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | +8 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| K. Love | F-C | 35:43 | 10-15 | 2-4 | 7-8 | +20 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29 | |
| N. Pekovic | C | 18:49 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| L. Ridnour | G | 34:58 | 5-11 | 0-3 | 1-1 | -5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| R. Rubio | G | 37:47 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 4-4 | +22 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
| A. Randolph | 14:09 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | -7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||
| M. Beasley | 32:28 | 10-14 | 2-3 | 12-12 | +4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 34 | ||
| W. Ellington | 09:35 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-3 | -6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
| D. Williams | 06:46 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| M. Webster | 22:13 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 1-1 | +12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | ||
| B. Miller | 01:41 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| A. Tolliver | 05:31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| D. Milicic | NWT - ILLNESS | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 240 | 43-74 | 6-17 | 28-31 | 7 | 33 | 40 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 120 | |||
| 58.1% | 35.3% | 90.3% | TEAM REBS: 5 | TOTAL TO: 18 | |||||||||||||
Now on ward to the grades. I admit that I wasn't able to catch the whole game tonight but ... here we go.
Well folks, this is classic Wesley Johnson version crap. 2-7 FGs, one of them a dunk, the other make, a long two. Combine that with missing treys, and passing up treys and a whopping six turn overs. The box score speaks for itself this was not a great game for Wes. I could've sworn he blocked a shot but they didn't give him credit. Anyway, this guys not playing like a starting SF or SG. A surprising drive and dunk though, so that rolls it up.
Grade: D (Not an F because he managed to land a +/- of +8, proves he didn't get completely burned)
So what, he didn't get a Double Double. So what Ricky out rebounded him. He scored 29 points on 10-15 shooting. Kevin Love really wasn't joking that he was going to get on a hot streak eventually. It wasn't a lights out complete Kevin Love box score stuffer, but it was a good sold well played game.
Grade: A (Hitting shots this effectively is worth an A-
Well, he's a beast, and he continues to prove it. Pek can score on the block and rebound, and he did that tonight. He does exactly what he's supposed to do: set picks and get boards. He's looking much more consistent than good ol' (non-super) Darko.
Grade: A-
Finally he hit some shots. He's been shooting cold lately, but to day it was better. Still not great, but adequate. He got to the rim nicely once I remember splitting the D for a lay in. He's also seems to be doing well with that little floater (a la shot over Diondre Jordan).
Grade: B+ (His grade rises if he hits more of his threes)
This was a great game for Ricky. He took it to the rim, hit his shots, hit threes. Ricky rolled tonight (oh my Rick Roll? weird). 18-11-8 is really filling the stat sheet up & a +/- of +22. Just a great game.
Grade: A+
Ho hum. It wasn't bad. It wasn't good. I want to see Anthony block some more shots.
Grade: B-
Boom! Beasley sighting! I think I posted something about Beasley lighting it up. Yep, a couple of videos of him doing just that last year. This highlight reel would look quite similar. I think he's finally starting to understand the whole take it to the rim and draw fouls ideal, and it appears that the refs are starting to notice that he's actually capable of that. I for see a move into the starting line up coming soon (agree? COMMENT).
Grade: A (not a A+ because he didn't do much else than score)
He'd getting back into the action and he looks like he's moving pretty good. It seems like he's accepting his current role. Really liked the way that he sprinted to the rim on that lob.
Grade: B
Others: Not enough minutes or impact to deserve a grade.
Anyway, good win for the wolves.
Until next time,
peace yall
134 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I didn't get to see the game,
so take this with a grain (block) of salt, but I’d give Beasley an A+ just because he scored exactly how he scores best. It’s all we’ve ever wanted from him on the offensive end. We have plenty of guys who can score, and a few guys who can rebound, but rarely does any of our guys score like that.
Also, Ricky’s performance was incredible. Check out this highlight video.
Great report card! A great game, so it’s hard to grade anyone too low.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 30, 2012 11:53 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
You rat bastard . . . hehe.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 30, 2012 11:59 PM CST up reply actions
youtube loads too slow these days
to give that joke the zing it used to have
In a post that included a Rickroll joke, no less.
(It’s the only reason I did it, honest.)
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 1:54 AM CST up reply actions
True.
But he could have had the courtesy-among-smartasses to let it ride.
(I have no way of knowing if GWST11 is a smartass—I just assume everyone is as juvenile as I am.)
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 12:58 AM CST up reply actions
That which does not kill us
makes us stronger.
I often RickRoll myself in the morning to prepare for my forum reading for the day.
The ringtone on my sister's phone
when I call her is the RickRoll song. So every time I call her, she gets RickRolled.
www.unleashkevinlove.com
by erikanthony on Jan 31, 2012 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
Also,
“rarely does”? I need to be put down.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 12:59 AM CST up reply actions
maybe you need to hire an editor
lots of folks looking for extra work
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
by littleboxes on Jan 31, 2012 10:17 AM CST up reply actions
Well played sir
I actually watched the video for about 20seconds to see if there was something good hidden in it. Thought you might have had some kind of inverse Rick Roll going. Serves me right for not reading the other comments first.
dude
DUDE
Not cool
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Jan 31, 2012 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
Really, CJ?
I would have thought this would have burned your soul.
T'Wolves 2012: Soundtrack Provided By The Regular Grooves
I don't have a soul.
That should be obvious here.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
Your former sig line from Epictetus would beg to differ.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
I am nothing
carrying a corpse. Ha! Good catch.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Feb 1, 2012 3:51 PM CST up reply actions
just an awesome game with a lot of high grades being warranted..
nicely done Michael..
I love the length and athleticism
that this team has. Our depth is going to be tested against on wednesday against Indy. It would be huge to beat them and go .500…
Will your time with the Pacer Front office
Divide your loyalty for this game, David?
I also love the smiles we've got on this roster.
No team can compete with our sheer physical talent.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Jan 31, 2012 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
I like Beasley off the bench
There I said it. He scores, but he doesn’t make the offense hum, which we need when the game opens. I’d rather us (rubio) get the O into rhythm at the beginning of the game than see Beasley hold onto the ball.
That’s not to say that he should always come off the bench. Once he learns how to play within the offense and do his business, then I think we should start him.
Yeah, the offense has come out of the gate flying recently with Beasley out.
by Ray Williams? on Jan 31, 2012 8:15 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Personally, I think the Offense has been real sluggish prior tonight coming into a game
Not Saying Beasley will help…a good #2 would help.
by Timberwolf i.e. Albatross on Jan 31, 2012 8:38 AM CST up reply actions
With competent SG (not in the roster) and SF (healthy Webster) this team would be a solid playoff team.
Coach has to keep Beasly away from becoming the crazy version of Gay or Melo, score minded players who hurt their teams and never will make them contenders. NBA teams need a guy who they can send to attack in iso mode on ocassion. Coach has to avoid Beasly from becoming the crazy version of Gay or Melo, score minded players who hurt their teams and never will make them tittle contenders. NBA teams need a guy who they can send to attack in iso mode on ocassion, more or less depending of games, and that´s what only Beasly can do in this team. But Adelman has to keep Beasly coming off the bench, keep him humble ("you´re not the leader, you are the scorer when your number is called, the leader is the guy who knows the playbook, and Rick has to teach him to play defense too, especially to not get lost in zone defense.
Getting your point across requires 2 tries ;)
But you’re right… and how I wish I’d staid up for this one instead of Sunday’s! I was falling asleep at work yesterday.
Good job!
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
Eh
I think we would be fine having webster at the 2 and barea and ellington coming off the bench. I love having webster’s length, Barea’s aggression, and Ellington’s footwork on D.
Can't really disagree, but i would give Beasley an A+
We need to positively reinforce that as much as possible.
T'Wolves 2012: Where Players We Hate Suck All The Time
Nice Report Card.
A decisive win on the road against a good team is always cause for generosity.
I am all for keeping Beasley as a sixth man/ scorer option. I think that suits his skills set perfectly if he can wrap his head around it.
I have been noticing both Beasley and Randolph start to make the wrong play and then reverse course and make the right basketball play. It was nice last night to see Ridnour reward Randolph with a close in shot for this.
Hopefully the coach is getting through to them and once they train their instincts towards the right basketball play they will make it quicker and be more effective.
Good write up
Note on the game: Beasley did great and all but the offensive sets seemed to be either A) go to Beasley or B) go with PnR etc. Once Beasley had the ball, like on every other night, opponents know he’s gonna try to score/shoot. The difference last night was Beasley made shots and drove a lot more often. But he still needs to be a part of the whole offense instead of being a separate piece because we all know he’s not gonna have Budinger on him every game. I am shocked it took McHale so long to double Michael.
by Jordan Seiffert on Jan 31, 2012 9:03 AM CST reply actions
There were one or two plays
Where Beasley quickly measured up the situation and gave up to attempt an attempt. It was good to see. I was perfectly okay with him today and if he can incorporate giving up these kinds of plays more in a good rhythm, he will be a super player.
I’d also like to see some traditional sets run for him by Adelman. I want to see him succeed as a team player. Come the playoffs, it will be important to really mix thing up. If I know correctly, he is a good passer too. We really need to create plays where the play can both turn out to be some kind of isolation or Beasley has the option of starting the play in a nice rhythm. That would be awesome, and Adelman is the man to find these kinds of plays.
What I didn't like
Was during those non-attempts, it did take him some seconds to really make himself give up the play. Maybe he is not used to giving up, maybe he was conflicted about what to do, but it did cost us some seconds. Plus, when he gave up the ball, we were really back to where we began. I’d actually like to see some plays in which a given-up isolation can quickly turn into a normal play.
I hope Beas gives Mr. Love and Mr. Rubio some credit...
Beas gets 12 pts on FTs — 12 of 12 attempts is very cool. But Beas never got the calls before. Why is he getting calls now? Here’s my take:
- Love’s performance last year got the attention of the refs and moved the Wolves from earthworm level to a team that at least gets some sunlight on what they are doing.
- Rubio’s performance this year got not only the ref’s attention, but made the Wolves a fan favorite — the ref’s cannot diss us without the world knowing.
- Love’s frequent, ummm - reminders to the refs that fouls are being committed are having an affect that shines the light on players like Beas as well.
I think that without Love & Rubio, Beas would never have had such a great night. I don’t wanna take away from Beas’s accomplishment, he was awesome. But the fact that he was getting calls that he never would have gotten last year is due to team effort. I guess I shoulda included Adelman as a factor as well.
Regardless, if Beas can keep this up, we are in the playoffs. A delightful victory and hopefully an omen as well.
Maybe you'r right but
Beas went to the rim stronger (and more) than he used to. I would like to see him post up more (and don’t post up than shoot turnaround jumper but to go to the rim strongly.)
Didn't watch, but when someone's matched up on a defender "like a foot shorter than me,"
free throws are one possible result.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
Let's be honest
suddenly we’re getting the calls more often than not, and it’s not hard to believe that the excrescent sleaze that is David Stern’s NBA would tell the refs to cut Ricky and his teammates some slack.
Every year the NBA LOVES to see a formerly bad team pick up their game and make the playoffs. I think we’re this year’s anointed surprise team, and even Pek will start getting calls as the season progresses.
Yo ho ho and a FirstRow stream!
by TMiss on Jan 31, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Balance this, though
with David Stern’s interest in the Hornets future worth. Wolves in the playoffs means no lottery luck for that pick. But, I hope you’re right.
Actually, I hope it’s a genuine product without such corruption…
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
I don't buy into any conspiracy on this
I do believe that better teams get the calls, but I think it’s a lot simpler than a conspiracy.
It’s like this: When a bad player gets hit, the refs see a bad player making a bad play. When a good player makes a bad/awkward play, they see a foul. If it’s unclear, they’re going to give better players on better teams the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think it’s intentional, I think it’s as simple as what they know biasing what they see.
Now that we don’t suck, we get the benefit of the doubt more often.
by Dumbhead62 on Jan 31, 2012 1:08 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I would say
We’re more relevant and thus are getting more calls. I don’t think its any more dubious than that.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Jan 31, 2012 5:45 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Dude, it's Adelman
He’s a seasoned pro when it comes to ref politics. He couldn’t believe that traveling call on Beasley. He just stood right up and started yelling at the refs “call that all game at both ends”.
I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
by NBA Observer on Jan 31, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Furthermore
A lot of Beasley’s FT attempts in the fourth were very untimely calls for refs to just make. The Wolves were +12 or +14 with 6-8 minutes remaining. The refs called the fouls. It slowed down the fourth quarter, but they had to call it when Courtney Lee is trying to trace Beasley’s tatoos.
I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
by NBA Observer on Jan 31, 2012 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Beasley caution
Driving to the hoop when it’s there for him is almost never bad. I do think he got bailed out once or twice by the refs. Much of his driving comes from being able to hit his jump shots. When he’s not missing his jump shots, he’s going to have a good game. But when he misses, I think it’s going to look a lot uglier.
He still stopped the ball a lot, and he made some goofy, irresponsible passes that probably come from having to think hard about getting others involved when that should naturally flow. Not unlike when Wellington got hot, I really want to see more. What happens when his shot isn’t falling? Is he still helpful, or does that mean we’re going to lose the game unless we sit him?
You can't...dust...for vomit.
Of course, almost everything went in for Beas
but he gave as hint that he might be changing. He tried to pass (ok, made bad ones but it s something completely new to him). He must learn not to force shots when it is not his night. He really have to use size advantage which he often has.
We will see how he responds on nights when shot isn’t falling….
He has a bad habit
You know his “spot”? Usually left wing, 18-20 ft from hoop? Yes, he is good shooting and driving from there but when he did pass (or at least two of his passes from there) were ACROSS the paint to the right elbow. Not a bounce pass but chest pass – easily picked off once and tipped (I believe) the other time. That pass won’t create much unless the receiver is cutting or coming off a screen.
by Jordan Seiffert on Jan 31, 2012 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
Beas was getting hacked
Initial broadcast wasn’t showing it. I thought he was getting calls too. But upon replay it was Courtney Lee most of time just raking him across the arm.
I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
by NBA Observer on Jan 31, 2012 12:20 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
I don’t remember any calls that were really bail outs. The refs called the fouls even though they may have been untimely because the fouls were so obvious. If you watched closely you could see Lee going for the ball, missing it completely, and grabbing Beasley’s arm and pulling it off the ball.
You're probably right
I just want to see what it does to the Wolves when he’s not shooting well. Can he stay on the floor and not kill us? If so, he’s probably turned a corner.
You can't...dust...for vomit.
Rubio keeps teasing us with a near triple-double.
And hinting at the possibility of a quadruple-double. It’s just a matter of time…
I don’t know if he’ll get it this year with the pace he’s on. He’s appeared gassed a few times in recent games.
It'll depend on Barea's health
When Barea gets back into the rotation, we’ll likely see Rubio’s minutes drop down to a more reasonable number. Hopefully that increases the quality of his minutes (not that I could complain with what he’s giving us already). :)
If he's pooped out
I don’t even notice. He’s just soooooooooooooo good.
You can't...dust...for vomit.
Keep Beas on the bench
If he somehow keeps playing like this (even a little worse than this), I still think he fits better on a second unit. He doesn’t really seem to gain that much from Rubio, and seems to be just what we need when our bench comes in: someone who can score without needing to be set up. Whether or not he stays efficient is another story entirely.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
I agree
I think this is why, earlier in the year, Adelman had Beasley starting and Rubio came off of the bench. The two do not mesh well offensively, so they need to be on separate units. It just happens now that the roles are reversed. One unit will thrive off of the passes of Rubio, while the other will run off of Rinour (no D) and Beasley. Two units with separate strengths.
by Smilin' Carl on Jan 31, 2012 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
Incmikowawawskiski with a great interview of Beasley
“What kind of groove did you get into?”
“My Regular Groove.”
I propose “The Regular Grooves” as the Canis Hoopus house band.
T'Wolves 2012: Where Players We Hate Suck All The Time
Rick Roll?
How brilliant would it be if a host of fake videos were made that suddenly broke into Ricky Rubio “Rick’n’Roll” highlights á la the Rickroll jokes? Picture a cat playing the piano and suddenly the video cuts to Ricky making an absurd pass for yet another slam dunk!
Yo ho ho and a FirstRow stream!
Anyone notice something about the Wolves offensive rebounding?
Last night I noticed that Pek and Love are the only players that once a shot is put up migrate towards the basket to, you know, rebound a potential miss. Beasley, Tolliver, Webster, Johnson, and Randolph literally take steps away from the basket after a shot attempt.
I can predict the future using Norm Van Lier's crystal balls.
"Sam has a tendency to denigrate reports coming from any reporter who didn’t also cover the day Naismith first put up the peach baskets." - snley
What I've noticed different
about the Wolves this year is astounding. In years past, we’d go into the 4th down by a few, up by a few, didn’t matter. You had the overwhelming feeling that the game was already decided and The Wolves would lose somehow. I don’t have that feeling anymore. Instead, I have a feeling that we will pull it out for the W. We used to lose this game and I’d feel nothing, because that was the Wolves’ MO. Now? I am genuinely disappointed that we couldn’t pull out a win. Our Puppies are changing before our eyes, folks.
www.unleashkevinlove.com
by erikanthony on Jan 31, 2012 1:12 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Kind of but
Assuming it’s not a last shot a the end of the game type situation we don’t want all 5 guys going for offensive rebounds. Generally its easier for the defense to grab the rebound so having no one getting back on D would lead to a lot of wide open fast break points. Love and Pek are the players who do it the most because Pek is always directly under the basket and Love is always looking for rebounds. The other players rebound in similar ways, they either go for it if it’s a long rebound in their direction or they crash the boards if there’s a lane leading to the rim, otherwise they are (or should be) transitioning back on defense.
Division of labor --
It’s a 19th century concept, Naismith invented it, Henry Ford refined it.
I think we need an assembly line process. We have rebounders, passers, shooters. Break it down and keep focused on the job at hand.
The owner is named Taylor
this could work efficiently, I believe.
"Humor is reason gone mad." Marx (Groucho, for the reason-gone-mad impaired)
Giving Wes a D is charitable
He played a terrible, terrible game.
"I don't want to have to read you the riot act, but I am going to have to read you some extracts from the riot act."
Beasley Plus Minus
I didnt see the game either, but compared to the starters his plus minus wasnt very good.What is that all about? Was he poor on defense? was it due to martin? Either way its great to see him shoot the ball so wel.
As you know +/- isn't that revealing in a one game setting,
but I will tell you the reduced +/- for Beasley is because he was on the floor with the second unit for some time.
Basically, it's due to
The run was with the starters in the 3rd Q.
You can't...dust...for vomit.
Beasley + Ridnour
on the court together is just begging for a high scoring game. Their defense is almost always atrocious. Beasley was much better last night and I think some of the reason for his +/- not being great was just that he was playing with Ridnour for awhile and Ridnour was guarding Kevin Martin. Ridnour vs. Kevin Martin is a horrible matchup—Luke cannot stay in front of him, nor can he affect his jumper. Beasley and Ridnour typically play all-star game basketball(but not all-star level). Lots of looking for their own shot and no defense. This game, Beasley came off the bench playing within the system fairly well, but got hot and started taking high-efficiency shots. He played a pretty good all-around game other than 1 bad pass. Very nice step in his progression, but I would keep him coming off the bench. He is useful to have when Love isn’t on the floor and efficient/consistent bench production(assuming Beasley can provide that) can make this team a winner.
by Imyourhuckleberry on Jan 31, 2012 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
He was on the floor in the second quarter
during a stretch when some of his teammates were breaking down defensively.
www.punchdrunkwolves.com
@PDWolves
Brad Miller
played less than 2mins, didn’t post a single stat in the box score, and was still a +6. What?
www.unleashkevinlove.com
Read it this way....
He didn’t disrupt the offense, or he helped teammates score by positioning himself well, or he denied his guy the ball, or he kept his guy from scoring, or he helped keep other opponents from scoring, or he blocked out his man on rebounds, or…. Hmm, so many other things that don’t go into the stats.
Generally single game +/- doesn't tell you squat,
but there is a reason that Luke was our only starter with a (-) last night.
Looking at popcorn machine’s gameflow, we made our 2nd quarter comeback when Luke sat down and in the 3rd we played well with Luke, but really turned it on when he hit the bench.
And 23 of KMart’s 29 points came with Luke in the game.
This is another example of using stats to reinforce a bias
Beasley sets a team record for points off the bench, but didn’t get enough of those points in a preferred way. Or we just know it won’t last. Or we know he will backslide or hog the ball. Ridnour guards World Peace in the Laker game. World Peace contributes few points, but it couldn’t be the undersized Ridnour’s plucky defense. The meme is, instead, that MWP has long since stopped scoring on anyone, so a broom could guard him. Miller contributes not one mentionable stat, but is +6, more than Beasley. It implies that we would have won the game even more easily if Miller had played more minutes than Beasley. Stats we don’t like, we marginalize or ignore. Stats that back us up, we lionize and praise. It just never ends.
How many games have started out with poor shooting/turnovers dropping us into a huge hole at the beginning of the game? Games where the only player with some semblance of shooting acumen at that point has been Ridnour? Maybe the real reason we were able to blow this game open is that for the first time in many games we were hotter than the other team at the start of the game. Simple as that.
by ogishkemuncie on Jan 31, 2012 6:08 PM CST up reply actions
Ridnour needs to learn from Rubio on how to control the tempo of the game.
Be smarter, dribble with purpose.
this does not describe a problem with stats
it describes a problem that all people have with bias in judgement. One argument for stats and is that it’s easier to see and argue about bias with stats than it is for the eye test.
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
One argument for stats and is that it’s easier to see and argue about bias with stats than it is for the eye test
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT!!!!
Everyone has bias and everyone relies on simplifications to understand the world. Statistical arguments are superior, not because they are free of bias and assumptions, but because these flaws are laid bare for anyone to see.
by vjl110 on Feb 1, 2012 10:08 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The mind was made to...
…process stories and it is much easier to convey a story with numbers than it is with words, which have a nasty habit of meaning slightly different things to slightly different people. 2+2 will always equal 4 while “he really can’t create his own shot” rings all sorts of different bells. If the math is right, you can make objective (in the sense of each side of the equation has to equal the other) claims about how Activity X correlates with Claim Y. That doesn’t mean the right question is being asked or the right story being told, but it does mean that there is an objective truth to the formula in hand. Unless the math is bad, the problem is never with the “stats”; it’s with the question they are used to answer.
Beasley 12-12 from the line?
I cannot remember the last time I saw Beasley make all of his free throws in a game, especially 12. Beasley looked like a much more mature person last night as he put his head down, shut up, and just played. His going 12-12 from the line is a testament to his keeping his head in the game and playing like an adult. He admitted after the game that he stopped worrying about his shot, stopped thinking altogether and just played. Maybe this 6-man role is bringing the best out of Super Cool Beas…
by Timberpups Blog on Jan 31, 2012 2:09 PM CST reply actions
Beasley's high free throw attempts gives us a pretty narrow range of games to choose from.
He’s shot as many as 12 free throws twice here. Let’s set the bar at 10 FTAs, though. There’ve only been 28 ten-FTA games by Wolves players in the last two years, since B-Easy’s been around.
Kevin Love has 23 of those 28 games. Bring your hard hat to work, Mr. Love.
Mike has had games where he was 7-10, 8-12, and 12-12 from the line. I wish the opposition would defend Mike with a Courtney Lee, and not force him to go right, every dang night. Alas, it doesn’t happen so often.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
In the game I saw, Beasley was much better than half a grade over Ridnour
But we are so full of joy that I’m not gonna bitch more our must-only-be-backup PG
Did you happen to see him on the other half of the court?
Old Beasley was in full force on the defensive end and by full force I mean, totally lost and confused. He had a great game for sure, but I still think there was lots of room for improvement.
by Child soldier Frank Jaeger on Jan 31, 2012 9:16 PM CST up reply actions
Where would your team be without Ridnour?
Who are you going to play in his place? Ellington? Barrea is a phantom right now. Malcolm Lee has not played in the regular season, I believe. Ridnour has been a starting guard for years. He may not be your ideal #2, but the Wolves don’t have a #2.
Couldn't you say this about any position with an injury?
I’m expecting Ridnours minutes to drop to around 20 when JJ is back and fully healthy.
by Child soldier Frank Jaeger on Jan 31, 2012 9:17 PM CST up reply actions
Where would our team be without a starting two guard?
We’d be starting our backup point guard at the two, that’s where we’d be. ;-)
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
At least Ellington brings some hustle, don't want to run the offense and can D a bit
Even has had his rush of shooting.
They play in the same league, as I see it. If I must take one, I’ll take Ridnour, maybe.
Great coaching goes a long way
Timberwolves have faced 3 teams twice already in this shortened season and they have won the 2nd game in all of those matchups. They have beaten Dallas and the Spurs two times each and they avenged their worse loss of the season vs. Houston by winning a fun game last night. I previously didn’t expect the Wolves would win 33 games this season(I felt that was the upper limit of possibility), which would be amazing given the 17 wins in a full 82-game season last year. Now I am holding out hope that they can finish above .500, make the playoffs and destroy the value of the Chris Paul trade. You know that the Mavericks scheduled their ring ceremony against the Wolves thinking it was an easy win. That didn’t work out so well! Did it, Cuban?
by Imyourhuckleberry on Jan 31, 2012 6:41 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Wes had almost 3 minutes of very promising
ball in the 1st quarter, and seemed to be getting more confident. Then the wheels came off once again and he donned the cloak of “something far worse than invisibility”. I keep holding out hope that RA will get through to him at some point soon, but once JJ is back, it’s going to be tough for Wes to get minutes.
I loved having McHale run out of ideas and options after he so obviously enjoyed himself in the Rockets win at the Target Center. Payback is a MoFo, Kevin!!!!
Ricky is lobbing at an Ooptimal level!
*Now* we're talking sample size.
He nearly developed for 3 minutes there, but then his confidence waned? What Wes needs is “an epic dose of basketball viagra.”
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
" . . . the cloak of 'something far worse than invisibility'."
Nice. We should call him TCOSFWTI! I’m not sure how we should pronounce it, though . . .
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
Reply fail.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Jan 31, 2012 8:59 PM CST up reply actions
It was an awesome line, though, reply or no.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
A Spanish Tebow?
ESPN Blog Post:
jdubincident
So he’s the Spanish Tebow?
14 Hours Ago
· Like · Reply · Flag
Japeda91
Except this one can actually pass.
47 fans like this.
14 Hours Ago
· Like · Reply · Flag
bullschidt
Oh snap!
14 Hours Ago
· Like · Reply · Flag
Iamtheunderdog23
That was good
No way the T-word gets applied to our unicorn.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Feb 1, 2012 12:01 AM CST up reply actions
Ricky is, despite all the hooplah, seemingly humble.
Tebow is the opposite of humble.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
How so? The dude is about the most humble and down to earth person I've ever seen in interviews.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Feb 1, 2012 10:14 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah..
…the guy who manages to make himself the focal point of massive amounts of coverage to deliver a personal message is super humble. ;)
He’s selling something. If it were soap I think we’d all have a lot less compunction about labeling him as the opposite of humble.
Compare and contrast:
Tebow. Superbowl commercials. Kneeling. Etc.
Luke Ridnour. One of his newborn twins has a problem, he obviously turns to his faith as a big part of how he copes with it, but he eschews publicity of any kind, and has the team on radio silence to respect his privacy. Eventually he mentions it, once, at media day almost a year later.
Which one of these people is a self-aggrandizing kid? It’s an easy call.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
Maybe one of them is more outward with their faith?
Again, I see no problem here. If you have a problem just tune him out. Its at least better than most of the attention whore dumbasses that inhabit professional sports.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Feb 1, 2012 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
Tebow?
Kidding he bugs me even when I try to tune him out
by WolvesBigTicket on Feb 1, 2012 5:44 PM CST up reply actions
I don't follow football, and I don't watch ESPN.
I don’t watch TV news, and I don’t listen to sports radio, and I’m freaking tired of hearing about Tim Tebow. It’s like on CSI when a person dies and nobody notices and the body decays and the resulting fluids drip into the apartment below.
Those fluids are Tim Tebow.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Feb 1, 2012 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I guess I just don't care
He’s using his platform to push his faith. We’re seeing other athletes do the same now (Have you been watching Tolliver’s Twitter?).
I am not religious, but I have no problem with people broadcasting their views. Again, I see no reason to dislike Tebow. He gets a ton of coverage on ESPN, yeah, and that’s dumb, but its not his fault.
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Feb 1, 2012 3:59 PM CST up reply actions
When you think that you *speak for God*, that's not humility.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
I have no problem with people who talk to God
I have a big problem who say that God talks to them.
How do they know it’s not the other guy?
Probably
is a guy living within his head.
I know a lot about that.
I didn't mean it, i was forced by the little people within my head.
That could be said about any athlete that ever mentions god
I just want to thank god for this oppurtunity! I also want to thank him for ruining the other team’s day!
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Feb 1, 2012 4:01 PM CST up reply actions
Check my sig line.
For silly reasons I attended a Wooddale service a few weeks back. They have a little part of their services where people give ‘faith testimonials.’ That week one of the talks was by a High School kid. His basic story arc was that he’d been arrogant before, but now that he had rediscovered his faith he wasn’t arrogant any more – and because he’d become so humble, the football team made him captain, and they won the state tournament! Go him!
No undo pride there! No sirree. God rewarded him with a trophy!
That’s Tim Tebow. I can’t imagine what makes people accept superficial silly kids as supposedly religious figures, but in my version of Matthew there’s a verse at 6:5 about not making a self-promoting spectacle of your prayer. It’s called the Sermon on the Mount, and you’d think a devoutly religious person would have noticed it.
It’s like the people who survive a plane crash and say they think God has a plan for them. God must not have had a plan for all the people who died horribly in the flames. That’s a self-involved, asinine, awful sort of thing to say. It’s pure self-centeredness. I hate it.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
by feral on Feb 1, 2012 4:14 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
It's actually one of my pet peeves
I can’t like a sports figure that keeps crediting god for their accomplishments, or praying in the middle of sports events for a win… I jsut find it incredibly narcissistic (and self-involved and asinine, etc.).
I guess
I just chalk it up to people not thinking things through and not being logical
If I'm pissing you off its probably sarcasm
by CoffeeJanitor on Feb 1, 2012 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
Do most people proclaim the things we haven't thought through
to be Great Truths which the rest of the world is lucky enough to learn from our lips?
Arrogance. Huge, thoughtless, preening arrogance.
"First, I'd like to blame the Lord for causing us to lose today."
Huge difference
Rubio can pass the ball.
"Humor is reason gone mad." Marx (Groucho, for the reason-gone-mad impaired)
by uncle rico on Feb 1, 2012 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
And he delivers legitimate bounce passes.
"Oh my, oh my, oh my. Is that great basketball or what?" --Hubie Brown, Jan. 20, 2012
by Cynical Jason on Feb 1, 2012 3:54 PM CST up reply actions

by 















